National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

Similar documents
National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

Best Colleges Main Survey

learning collegiate assessment]

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Access Center Assessment Report

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Session 2B From understanding perspectives to informing public policy the potential and challenges for Q findings to inform survey design

6 Financial Aid Information

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

EVALUATION PLAN

A. General Information

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Apps4VA at JMU. Student Projects Featuring VLDS Data. Dr. Chris Mayfield. Department of Computer Science James Madison University

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Swarthmore College Common Data Set

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

Physician Assistant Program Goals, Indicators and Outcomes Report

National Academies STEM Workforce Summit

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEACHER DIFFERENCES IN MATHEMATICS ALTERNATIVE CERTIFICATION

African American Male Achievement Update

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2010

Shelters Elementary School

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Validation Requirements and Error Codes for Submitting Common Completion Metrics

Guidelines on how to use the Learning Agreement for Studies

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering


STUDY ABROAD INFORMATION MEETING

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

TIMSS ADVANCED 2015 USER GUIDE FOR THE INTERNATIONAL DATABASE. Pierre Foy

Evaluation of Teach For America:

The Diversity of STEM Majors and a Strategy for Improved STEM Retention

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

UNIVERSIDAD DEL ESTE Vicerrectoría Académica Vicerrectoría Asociada de Assessment Escuela de Ciencias y Tecnología

VOL. 3, NO. 5, May 2012 ISSN Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences CIS Journal. All rights reserved.

BUSINESS HONORS PROGRAM

National Survey of Student Engagement at UND Highlights for Students. Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Office of Institutional Research April 19, 2012

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

LIM College New York, NY

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

COLLEGE OF INTEGRATED CHINESE MEDICINE ADMISSIONS POLICY

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

KIS MYP Humanities Research Journal

A Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and

The Moodle and joule 2 Teacher Toolkit

value equivalent 6. Attendance Full-time Part-time Distance learning Mode of attendance 5 days pw n/a n/a

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

LEARNING AGREEMENT FOR STUDIES

Is Open Access Community College a Bad Idea?

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

TRAVEL TIME REPORT. Casualty Actuarial Society Education Policy Committee October 2001

FLORIDA. -Mindingall. Portilla Dr. Wilbert. endent of School. Superinte. Associate Curriculum. Assistant

Bellehaven Elementary

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

Understanding and Interpreting the NRC s Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (2010)

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

E-learning Strategies to Support Databases Courses: a Case Study

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

08-09 DATA REVIEW AND ACTION PLANS Candidate Reports

Creating an Online Test. **This document was revised for the use of Plano ISD teachers and staff.

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Introduction. Educational policymakers in most schools and districts face considerable pressure to

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

The Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance

McNeese State University University of Louisiana System. GRAD Act Annual Report FY

PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results

FTE General Instructions

Annual Report Accredited Member

SER CHANGES~ACCOMMODATIONS PAGES

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

Using GIFT to Support an Empirical Study on the Impact of the Self-Reference Effect on Learning

Transcription:

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence-to-Degree Rates Since 1983, ACT has collected a comprehensive database of first-to-second-year retention rates and persistence-to-degree rates. These rates provide national benchmarks for institution type and level of selectivity. Data are compiled by ACT from the ACT stitutional Data Questionnaire, an annual online survey of information collected from two-year and four-year postsecondary institutions. First-to-Second-Year Retention Rates Table 1. Summary Table: National First-to-Second-Year Retention Rates by stitutional Type Table 2. First-to-Second-Year Retention Rates: Two-Year stitutions by Admission Table 3. First-to-Second-Year Retention Rates: Four-Year Public stitutions by Level of and Degrees Offered Table. First-to-Second-Year Retention Rates: Four-Year Private stitutions by Level of and Degrees Offered Persistence-to-Degree Rates Table. Summary Table: National Persistence-to-Degree Rates by stitutional Type Table. National Persistence-to-Degree Rates: Two-Year stitutions by Level of Table 7. National Persistence-to-Degree Rates: Four-Year Public stitutions by Degrees Offered and Level of Table 8. National Persistence-to-Degree Rates: Four-Year Private stitutions by Degrees Offered and Level of To view this content, go to www.act.org/research and search on retention. 2017 by ACT, c. All rights reserved. MS2807

Important formation About These Tables Cohort description: First-time/full-time students who were first enrolled at a postsecondary institution in fall 201. Retention rate: Percent of first-time/full-time students who first enrolled in fall 201 and were also enrolled in fall 201 at the same institution. Persistence-to-degree rate: Percent of students completing a degree within a designated time frame at the same institution. The tables in this document are based on the year in which a particular cohort enrolled as first-time/full-time degree-seeking students, as illustrated below. Number of to Complete 2 3 Year of First Enrollment 201 2013 2012 2011 2010 These reports are based on data accumulated through June 1, 2017. Many of the tables are reported by institutional selectivity. The selectivity categories are based on the general descriptions below. Level ACT Test Middle 0% SAT Test Middle 0%* Definition Highly 2 30 1710 2000 Majority admitted from top 10% of high school class 21 2 170 1770 Majority admitted from top 2% of high school class Traditional 18 2 1290 10 Majority admitted from top 0% of high school class Liberal 17 22 1230 130 Majority admitted from bottom 0% of high school class Open 1 21 1170 180 Generally open to all with high school diploma or equivalent * SAT score ranges are a point-to-point concordance with ACT scores based on a joint study by ACT and the College Board. ranges may vary from one institution to another. 2

Table 1 Summary Table: National First-to-Second-Year Retention Rates by stitutional Type Degree Level/Control N (%) SD* Two-Year Public 713 7. 10. Two-Year Private. 21. BA/BS Public 93. 1.7 BA/BS Private 23 72. 18.3 MA/MS/MBA/1st Professional Public 172 9.9 12.1 MA/MS/MBA/1st Professional Private 11 73. 13.2 PhD Public 23 79.0 10.9 PhD Private 29 81.2 10.8 Total 2189 8.8 NA * Standard Deviation Source: ACT stitutional Data File, 2017 3

Table 2 First-to-Second-Year Retention Rates: Two-Year stitutions by Admission Two-Year Private stitutions Two-Year Public stitutions stitutions in Row N (%) SD Highly 2 93.0 1 2.0 3 82.7 17.9 8.0 2.0 2 3.0.7 7 7.9 2.1 Traditional 8 71. 18.0 12 7.1 12.2 20 2.9 1.1 Liberal 3 8.7 1.0 2.0 10.1 8. 12.0 Open 27.3 19.1 93 7. 10. 720 7. 10.9 stitutions in Column. 21. 713 7. 10. 78 7.9 11. Source: ACT stitutional Data File, 2017

Table 3 First-to-Second-Year Retention Rates: Four-Year Public stitutions by Level of and Degrees Offered Degrees Only and Master s Degrees Only, Master s, and Doctoral Degrees stitutions in Row N (%) SD Highly 3 9.3 2. 87. 10.2 28 93.8 2.7 3 93.1.8 82.8 9. 18 81.3.9 82. 13. 8 82.3 12.2 Traditional 31 71.2 9.7 117 70. 8.1 1 7.9 7.1 293 72.7 8.1 Liberal 73.0 10.7 7 8.7 10. 70. 0. 1 70. 8.9 Open 0.2 11.9 2.8 1. 2 72.0 2.8 77. 13. stitutions in Column 93. 1.7 172 9.9 12.1 23 79.0 10.9 08 73.2 13. Source: ACT stitutional Data File, 2017

Table First-to-Second-Year Retention Rates: Four-Year Private stitutions by Level of and Degrees Offered Degrees Only and Master s Degrees Only, Master s, and Doctoral Degrees stitutions in Row N (%) SD Highly 30 93.3 3.2 19 92.2. 9 9.0 3.1 98 93.9 3. 1 82. 9.1 108 81.8 8. 82 82. 7.7 21 82.3 8. Traditional 82 7.1 12.9 22 71.0 9.9 122 7. 8.3 28 71. 10. Liberal 20 2.9 12.9 2 9. 1.2 8 78. 1.8 3 3. 1. Open 0 0.9 2. 3 2.9 18. 8 7. 18. 93 2.8 22.1 stitutions in Column 23 72. 18.3 11 73. 13.2 29 81.2 10.8 923 7. 1. Source: ACT stitutional Data File, 2017

Table Summary Table: National Persistence-to-Degree* Rates by stitutional Type Degree Level/Control N (%) SD Two-Year Public 3 22.0 1.0 Two-Year Private 17.9 32.0 BA/BS Public 9 3.9 20. BA/BS Private 18 7.9 2.1 MA/1st Professional Public 11 0.0 18. MA/1st Professional Private 298.8 1. PhD Public 213 1.9 18. PhD Private 231 3.2 18.0 Total 11.9 NA * Completion in three years for associate s degree; five years for BA/BS Source: ACT stitutional Data File, 2017 7

Table National Persistence-to-Degree Rates: Two-Year stitutions by Level of Two-Year Private stitutions Two-Year Public stitutions stitutions in Row 2 3 2 3 2 3 Highly N = 1 1 1 1 1 1 (%) = 80.0 8.0 87.0 80.0 8.0 87.0 SD = N = 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 (%) = 71.0 80.0 3. 0.0 SD = 0.2. N = 7 3 3 11 9 Traditional (%) = 32. 39.8 0.7 2.8 38.8 39.3 30. 39.2 0.0 SD = 27. 22. 10.3 28.2 2.3 32. 2. 22.0 21. N = 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 Liberal (%) = 1.0 18.0 20.0.0 1.0 3.0 20.0 SD = 7.1 1. N = 7 10 8 28 3 29 292 3 277 Open (%) = 32...1 12. 21.7 2.2 12.9 22.3 2.8 SD = 33. 3. 3.7 11. 1. 1. 12. 1.0 1. stitutions in Column N = 17 17 13 290 3 273 307 371 28 (%) = 3..9.8 12. 22.0 2.3 13.9 23.1 2.2 SD = 30. 32.0 30. 11.8 1.0 1.8 1. 1.9 1.3 Source: ACT stitutional Data File, 2017 8

Table 7 National Persistence-to-Degree Rates: Four-Year Public stitutions by Degrees Offered and Level of Degrees Only and Master s Degrees Only, Master s, and Doctoral Degrees Highly N = 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 (%) = 80. 82.0 83. 0.0 77.7 80.7 3.3 80.2 82. SD = 2.1.2 3. 13.7 7. 7.8 1. 8.0 7.0 N = 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 3 (%) =.0 3.3 7.3. 0.9 3.7 2.8 0.3.2 SD = 32.2 2.1 21.2 1. 12.7 12. 18.3 13.9 12.1 N = 2 2 2 100 99 103 128 12 130 Traditional (%) = 2.7 38.8 2.8 2. 39.7.0 2.0 2.7 9.2 SD = 12.3 13.7 1.0 1. 1.8 1.0 11. 13.7 12.2 N = 7 3 2 2 Liberal (%) = 21.0 3. 38.2 28.7 0.8 1.1 0.7 33.0 37. SD =.7 9.8 10. 22.0 19.0 18.3.8 22. 20. N = 1 1 17 18 18 19 Open (%) = 12.9 23. 2. 9. 17.7 22.7 SD = 10.7 19.7 21.3. 11.7 13. stitutions in Column N = 0 9 3 12 11 17 221 213 221 (%) = 2. 3.9 39.7 2.8 0.0 3.8 3.0 1.9 7. SD = 19. 20. 21. 17. 18. 17.7 19.8 18. 1. Source: ACT stitutional Data File, 2017 9

Table 8 National Persistence-to-Degree Rates: Four-Year Private stitutions by Degrees Offered and Level of Degrees Only and Master s Degrees Only, Master s, and Doctoral Degrees Highly N = 27 27 27 19 19 19 7 (%) = 83.3 87.1 88.0 7. 81. 83.1 78.7 87.3 89. SD = 8.3 7.3.8 9.2 8. 8.0 13.9 8.2.3 N = 2 3 88 8 89 7 73 73 (%) =.1 9.3 70.2 7.. 7..2.7 7.2 SD = 1.0 1.1 1.8 13.8 10.7 10.0 12. 11.7 11. N = 3 3 170 18 177 102 102 10 Traditional (%) = 3.8.3.1 39.9 8.8 0.9 1.7 2..2 SD = 1.9 1.2 1. 1. 12.3 12.1 1.2 12.7 11.7 N = 7 7 10 1 1 1 7 Liberal (%) = 27.3 3.3 39. 30.3 39.2. 3.3 9. 1. SD = 11.2 10.0 11.1 1.0 13. 12.9 12. 13. 13.9 N = 2 19 17 10 11 13 7 7 7 Open (%) = 21. 2.7 2.1 2.8 3.9..1.0 0.1 SD = 18.3 17.7 1. 19. 21.8 21.0 32.2 30.9 30. stitutions in Column N = 1 18 13 301 298 312 233 231 239 (%) = 1. 7.9 9.1..8 7.1 3. 3.2. SD = 2.2 2.1 2. 18. 1. 1. 20.0 18.0 17. Source: ACT stitutional Data File, 2017 10