Education System Stewardship Forum (ESSF) Work Programme achievement.

Similar documents
VISION: We are a Community of Learning in which our ākonga encounter Christ and excel in their learning.

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

Services for Children and Young People

Aurora College Annual Report

Summary and policy recommendations

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

YOUTH GUARANTEE STRATEGY FEES FREE PLACES REFLECTIONS CPIT

Sancta Maria Catholic Primary School

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

Report of External Evaluation and Review

Presentation of the English Montreal School Board To Mme Michelle Courchesne, Ministre de l Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport on

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

CAVTL Commission on Adult Vocational Teaching and Learning

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

Te Whanau Tahi-The way we do Family at Naenae College. Cultural Responsiveness and Restorative Practice

École Jeannine Manuel Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DN

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

Archdiocese of Birmingham

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

A European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

3 of Policy. Linking your Erasmus+ Schools project to national and European Policy

No educational system is better than its teachers

AAC/BOT Page 1 of 9

The Consistent Positive Direction Pinnacle Certification Course

Your Strategic Update

Section 1: Basic Principles and Framework of Behaviour

Bachelor of Software Engineering: Emerging sustainable partnership with industry in ODL

Drs Rachel Patrick, Emily Gray, Nikki Moodie School of Education, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, College of Design and Social Context

Essex Apprenticeships in Engineering and Manufacturing

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Strategic Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Measures

MOESAC MEDIUM TERM PLAN

An APEL Framework for the East of England

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

St Philip Howard Catholic School

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

SOCRATES PROGRAMME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS

to Club Development Guide.

Xenia Community Schools Board of Education Goals. Approved May 12, 2014

LAW ON HIGH SCHOOL. C o n t e n t s

STRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA COMMUNITY: SALMO, BRITISH COLUMBIA

The Bologna Process: actions taken and lessons learnt

Engineering Faculties in Developing and Assessing Professional Competencies for Engineers in Australia

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

5.7 Country case study: Vietnam

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Foundation Certificate in Higher Education

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Procedure - Higher Education

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

University of the Arts London (UAL) Diploma in Professional Studies Art and Design Date of production/revision May 2015

Business. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification

Newlands Girls School

Alternative education: Filling the gap in emergency and post-conflict situations

Woodhouse Primary School Sports Spending

This Access Agreement covers all relevant University provision delivered on-campus or in our UK partner institutions.

Evaluation of Learning Management System software. Part II of LMS Evaluation

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

CAUL Principles and Guidelines for Library Services to Onshore Students at Remote Campuses to Support Teaching and Learning

First Line Manager Development. Facilitated Blended Accredited

State Budget Update February 2016

Eastbury Primary School

Overview. Contrasts in Current Approaches to Quality Assurance of Universities in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

AIS KUWAIT. School Improvement Plan (SIP)

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

Kaipaki School. We expect the roll to climb to almost 100 in line with the demographic report from MoE through 2016.

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

NTU Student Dashboard

State Parental Involvement Plan

CARDIFF UNIVERSITY OF WALES UNITED KINGDOM. Christine Daniels 1. CONTEXT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALES AND OTHER SYSTEMS

OECD THEMATIC REVIEW OF TERTIARY EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

Alcohol and Other Drug Education Programmes GUIDE FOR SCHOOLS

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

Transcription:

Priority Area One: Māori and Pasifika learning and success Education System Stewardship Forum (ESSF) Work Programme 2016 1 Provide youth at risk of achieving only low or no qualifications, pathways to educational achievement and attainment, and use the insights gathered through this action to strengthen educational pathways and performance throughout the system. 2 Develop a robust evidence base across the education system to sharpen investments in Māori and Pasifika achievement. 3 Develop and deliver a new shared implementation approach to drive the lift in achievement we are all seeking for Māori and Pasifika. This could include a process led by an outside agency that has clients and stakeholders co-creating solutions with education agency staff. 4 Build education agencies capability and capacity to respond effectively to Māori and Pasifika learning and success. 5 Develop a co-ordinated system response to support all parts of the education sector respond effectively to Māori and Pasifika learning and success. 1.1 Expand NCEA and the whānau, NCEA and ma le Pasifika to provide families and communities with more information about education pathways. 1.2 Establish a one-stop education pathway information shop for learners, families and communities that connects to business and employers. 1.3 Re-engage learners who are outside of the education system (e.g. provision of make a space ). 1.4 Unlock education provision for learners who are outside of the education system. 1.5 Expand and connect student journey stories to tertiary pathways and/or into employment. 1.6 Promote STEM pathways to Māori and Pasifika. 1.7 Develop quality Māori medium pathway that increases participation and lifts student achievement. 2.1 Develop a framework for the review of current investment so we can: a. Stop ineffective investment b. Redirect the funding to accelerate Māori and Pasifika achievement. 2.2 Develop stronger system measures for Māori and Pasifika success. 2.3 Strengthen the collection of data on Māori medium provision across the system a. Collect data on Māori medium provision in tertiary. 2.4 Develop stronger processes for sharing Māori and Pasifika data across agencies. This is linked to Building Block B establish an innovative, integrated implementation model. 4.1 Develop and implement a system strategy to improve leadership in this area through the Education Career Board. 5.1 Collect consistent data on Māori and Pasifika learning and success across the system to identify providers needing additional assistance. 5.2 Agencies take immediate and coordinated action when providers are identified. 1

Priority Area Two: Powering up learners, parents, communities and employers to influence the quality and relevance of teaching and learning and lift achievement 1. Establish an education system learner and parent hub to provide pragmatic information, advice and issues resolution across the agencies. This could include an education helpline, a common complaints process and agreeing on one learner and parent portal for education. 2. Provide learners with their progressive record of learning from ECE to tertiary. 3. Build our insight capability and capacity to engage with learners, parents, communities and employers and back the sector to embed and expand good practice. 4. Establish an information channel for employers and the business community. 1.1 Involve learners, parents, communities and employers in the service design of the hub and services. 1.2 Establish the agreed channels. 1.3 Establish a common complaints process for learners and families. 1.4 Collect the information to improve operational practice. 1.5 Use plain language in all communications. This is linked to and dependent upon the achievement of Priority Area Four - Information management and technology. 3.1 Strengthen learner parent engagement about learning as part of ERO s 4/5 year returns. 3.2 Provide the sector with exemplars of good practice in PLD and resources. 3.3 Share each agency s resources for learners, parents and communities, avoid duplication, and use consistent messages when working in the sector. 3.4 Improve our operational practice through a rapid learning approach (such as Improving Cycles) to power up learners, parents, communities and employers. a. Segment customer groups to identify those who would benefit most from an engagement model b. Support innovation through changes to the BAU of agencies. 3.5 Build a student voice in to everything we do across the system. 3.6 Introduce an ongoing parent survey for ECE services and schools (similar to the OFSTED parent survey). 4.1 Work with employer groups to identify what education information they want and how and where they would like to receive it. 2

Priority Area Three: Quality teaching, leadership and assessment- a workforce and curriculum fit for purpose in an international and digital era 1. Implement a national approach to ensure all beginning teachers meet agreed quality requirements (for example, literacy, numeracy and digital and 21st century skills) and are recruited in areas of shortage. 2. Develop and implement shared systems across agencies to provide information that can be used to improve the quality of teaching, assessment and leadership from ECE to tertiary. 3. Develop a shared leadership strategy for the education sector workforce. 4. Develop a shared approach to support and promote high quality teaching, curriculum and assessment from ECE to tertiary. 1.1 Review and improve selection criteria for ITE to create high and consistent entry criteria that better meets the current demands (i.e. STEM subject teachers, Māori and Pasifika teachers). 1.2 Review and improve the support provided to Beginning Teachers (mentoring, talent management, career pathway planning etc). 1.3 Publish stakeholder feedback on the quality of ITE by provider to achieve greater transparency. 1.4 Review employment practices of Beginning Teachers to support greater retention. 1.5 Review the levers for quality teaching and teachers/educators across the system (including tertiary). 1.6 Develop consistent and agreed measures of teaching quality to use at key points of certification, appraisal and review (e.g. NZQA reviews). 2.1 Create one shared data and evidence set on the education sector workforce, including ITE pathways and qualifications (both Māori medium and mainstream) of current workforce etc. 2.2 Use the data to engage with the sector (and public) about the strengths and weaknesses of the system. 2.3 Create one portal for educators. 3.1 Develop a talent management approach to leadership. 3.2 Develop career pathways for pedagogical leadership from ECE to tertiary. 3.3 Recognise and reward sector leadership from ECE to tertiary. 3.4 Review principal appointment processes to support high quality appointments. 1.1 Provide educators and teachers with accessible information and professional learning to support their teaching practice (links to educator portal). 1.2 Promote effective collaboration to raise the quality of teaching. 1.3 Provide support to teachers to implement the curricula (with an initial focus on years 4 to 8 and ECE). 1.4 Develop a system approach to supporting the digital readiness of the sector including learners and educators. 1.5 Review the current curricula. 1.6 Review current assessment practices (with an initial focus on reducing unnecessary assessment in primary and NCEA). 3

Priority Area Four: Information management and technology 1. Align or consolidate our data systems, tools and our support and analytical capability, to improve access and decisionmaking for all. This may extend to the education agencies consolidating some systems with social sector agencies. 2. Facilitate easy, timely and consistent access to comprehensive data, information and support for learners, their families, and communities and other stakeholders in the learner s journey to assist them to make better decisions about their current and future learning; and the social, economic and cultural opportunities that their learning pathway can open up for them. 3. Provide/facilitate open access management and learner focused data and information to enable greater third party use and application. 4. Facilitate easy, timely and consistent access to comprehensive management data and information for those who manage the education systems (teachers, principals, managers, administrators, funders and policy makers) to enable them to make better management decisions at class, provider and system levels. 1.1 Consolidate tools, technology, people and resources across agencies. 1.2 Establish agreed principles for how we manage data and information. 1.3 Solve identity management across the system. 1.4 Develop a national education data dictionary. 1.5 Establish a shared agreement on data management and governance. 1.6 Complete a stock-take of the current data education agencies hold. 1.7 Improve data standard and quality (to meet international standards). 1.8 Develop a strategy for the management of wholesale data across the agencies. 1.9 Build agency capability. 1.10 Adopt international standards and guidelines. 2.1 Ask customers what information and support they want. 2.2 Develop a strategy for the development of retail products. 2.3 Build in customer feedback loops to improve the tools. 2.4 Involve customers in the design of retail products. 2.5 Segment data for stakeholder groups. 2.6 Identify the tool kit and pull the tools together in a cohesive way for customers. 2.7 Support customers to use information. 3.1 Develop common wholesale data channels. 3.2 Prepare wholesale data for shared use. 4.1 Ask customers what information they want. 4.2 Develop a common view at the data and information level of the business of education. 4.3 Support customers to use information to make quality decisions and plans. 4

Building blocks Building block action A. Further strengthen our collective stewardship role to improve system performance. B. Establish an innovative, integrated implementation model to enable staff and resources from across the agencies to jointly deliver. C. Push our planning and performance systems to get the optimal setting for alignment and individual agency accountability. A.1 Develop and tell our shared education story that sets out our vision, explains our priorities, outlines how we will work together and explores how the system will work better for our learners in future. A.2 Quickly establish a high impact high visibility flag ship project to demonstrate our ability to work together across agencies and with learners, parents and the private sector. i. A potential deliverable could be providing learners with their record of their learning from ECE through to tertiary and ongoing in to the workplace. This deliverable would require significant involvement from learners and their families and partnering with the private sector. This deliverable is included as a supporting action in Priority Area Four - Information management and technology. B.1 Establish service design thinking and implementation projects for each of the four priority areas. These projects will include elements of the Ministry s GUAVA collective team protocol with service design thinking expert support, the ability to work with users, strong sponsorship and be resourced. B.2 Each of the four priority areas could apply different approaches, for example: A co-located interagency project approach An outside led process run by an agency like Creative HQ that has clients, stakeholders co-creating solutions with education agency staff A tri-agency approach where three agencies work together intensively, periodically engaging with the other education agencies as necessary. B.3 Expand and embed a joint education system work programme. B.4 Use the education system work programme to promote shared leadership and talent management across our agencies through the Education Career Board. C.1 Develop and agree a shared system strategic framework across all the agencies and in so doing we will also agree the key performance measures for the four priority areas (and for system outcomes). C.2 Develop our next Four Year Plans and strategies together and share information more efficiently and effectively to enable the system to deliver on challenging but realistic targets looking out to 2020 and beyond. This will include taking opportunities through the Budget process to move to a more flexible appropriation structure for system agencies.