Alliance Youth and Community Engagement Policy

Similar documents
California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Community Based Participatory Action Research Partnership Protocol

Working with Local Authorities to Support the Localism Agenda

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Priorities for CBHS Draft 8/22/17

Community engagement toolkit for planning

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Social Justice Practicum (SJP) Description

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

ABI11111 ABIOSH Level 5 International Diploma in Environmental Sustainability Management

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

University of Toronto

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

University of Plymouth. Community Engagement Strategy

FRESNO COUNTY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN UPDATE

Public School Choice DRAFT

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Authentically embedding Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander peoples, cultures and histories in learning programs.

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

State Budget Update February 2016

LEAD 612 Advanced Qualitative Research Fall 2015 Dr. Lea Hubbard Camino Hall 101A

1.1 Examining beliefs and assumptions Begin a conversation to clarify beliefs and assumptions about professional learning and change.

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

Section 1: Program Design and Curriculum Planning

Medium-Term Strategy (MTS) Designed by Mahmoud Hamed

School Leadership Rubrics

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

Questions to Consider for Small Parent Groups/Parent Cafés

Every student absence jeopardizes the ability of students to succeed at school and schools to

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLE WEB CONFERENCE OR ON-CAMPUS INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

La Grange Park Public Library District Strategic Plan of Service FY 2014/ /16. Our Vision: Enriching Lives

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Ministry of Education General Administration for Private Education ELT Supervision

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

EPA RESOURCE KIT: EPA RESEARCH Report Series No. 131 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN SCIENCE AND POLICY

VISUALIZING SUCCESS PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE PUBLIC FORUM DECEMBER 17, 2013

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

The Mission of Teacher Education in a Center of Pedagogy Geared to the Mission of Schooling in a Democratic Society.

The 21st Century Principal

ASSET MAPPING WITH YOUTH

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

WORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

ONTARIO FOOD COLLABORATIVE

ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year

February 16. Save $30 on Registration: Designed for Managers and Staff of After School Programs. Early Bird Deadline: January 26, 2017

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

Course INTRODUCTION TO DEGREE PROGRAM EXPECTATIONS: WHAT FACULTY NEED TO KNOW NOW

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Request for Proposal UNDERGRADUATE ARABIC FLAGSHIP PROGRAM

Certified Six Sigma - Black Belt VS-1104

Harvesting the Wisdom of Coalitions

Wide Open Access: Information Literacy within Resource Sharing

City of Roseville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Scope of Services

GRANT WOOD ELEMENTARY School Improvement Plan

1. Professional learning communities Prelude. 4.2 Introduction

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

IMPORTANT STEPS WHEN BUILDING A NEW TEAM

Ministry of Education, Republic of Palau Executive Summary

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Conceptual Framework: Presentation

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

Power of Ten Leadership Academy Class Curriculum

Building Mutual Trust and Rapport. Navigating the Intersection of Administrators and Faculty in Short-Term Program Planning

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

State Parental Involvement Plan

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

SHARED LEADERSHIP. Building Student Success within a Strong School Community

SCHOOL EXEC CONNECT WEST ST. PAUL-MENDOTA HEIGHTS-EAGAN AREA SCHOOLS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH FOCUS GROUP FEEDBACK January 12, 2017

Programme Specification

November 17, 2017 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY. ADDENDUM 3 RFP Digital Integrated Enrollment Support for Students

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

PHOTOVOICE. Social Change Through Photography. Community Needs Assessment John Humphrey Centre for Peace and Human Rights

Transcription:

Alliance Youth and Community Engagement Policy DATE: November 16, 2016 TO: Alliance Board of Directors FROM: Rebecca Gilgen, Executive Director Policy Name: Alliance Youth and Community Engagement Policy Policy Intent and Summary The intent of this policy is to outline a structure and set of procedures that allow for intentional engagement of youth and community at multiple levels of the work of the Alliance. We seek to engage youth and community to help us achieve our mission of coordinating a system of high-quality, accessible and fully resourced opportunities that lead to an increase in high school graduation, pathways to college or career and reductions in young people s experience of violence. We are stronger when we include and engage a variety of experience, perspeictves and skills and when we utilize practices that foster creativity and equity. This document captures the Brooklyn Bridge Alliance for Youth s organizational approach for engaging the community and youth. Over the last 2 years we have seen the need for: An approach for ongoing engagement of Alliance members, community and youth, That this approach is rooted in our organizational values, and that Staff have a protocol to ensure authentic youth and community participation. This policy outlines considerations for determining which level and in what way engagement needs to occur in a given project, and provides a set of protocols to ensure that the engagement is thoughtful, well-planned and effective. This policy will inform all Alliance organizational practices and projects. Summary of action requested Staff consultation (April 22, 2015) Input from cultural communities conversations (Summer 2015) Alliance work group consultation (April, May, June) Strategy, BYC team approved 5/2015 ELT consent agenda 6/2015 AOC review 8/12/15 Review with Board Chair and Co-Chair (Nov 1, 2016) Request for Board approval (November 16, 2016) Approved November 16 th, 2016 1

Objectives We need authentic participation of community and youth in the development of programs, projects and initiatives to ensure that: 1. The services provided by the Alliance and Alliance members are responsive and effective, 2. That those most impacted are included in decision making processes, 3. The needs, problems, solutions and actions are identified through inclusive participation allowing for the emergence of unique and creative solutions, and 4. Partnerships are explicit and will be prioritized based on our mutual interests. Engagement Shaped by our Core Values The Alliance s core values guide and shape how all work is done. When we engage community and youth in our work, we are committed to acting in accordance with those core values. Our core values are: Courageous leadership and action Positive development for all youth in all places Authentic, timely and respectful communication Youth engagement, voice and leadership Individual and Collective Learning, Growing, Assessing and Celebrating Inclusive processes to maximize our resources Engagement Protocol In addition to acting in accordance with our core values, we will ensure that the following protocols are taken into consideration when planning for and implementing community or youth engagement strategies: Scaled We will be mindful of the level of impact that the given project, decision or initiative will have, when determining the level of community and/or youth engagement: The greater the impact - the greater our level of engagement will be. We will also take into consideration our own organizational capacity to engage in a high quality way and utilize strategies that match need and capacity. Intentional We will only seek feedback and input from community and youth when we intend to allow that feedback to shape the actions that we take and the decisions that are made. 2

Strategic We will involve diverse stakeholders, specifically those that are involved in or impacted by the initiative, project or decision. The engagement strategies will have a defined objective that will be measured and results from engagement efforts will be used as data for decision-making. Transparent We will ensure that we are transparent with those we engage about the level of engagement we are seeking (degree of participation), and will circle back to those we have engaged as the project progresses where appropriate and promised. We will share information and look for intersections. We will communicate our capacity so that stakeholders are aware of our limitations. We will say no if needed and support one another in managing the political issues that may arise from not meeting the immediate needs of a stakeholder. We understand that when we have conversations with community members, we are making a promise to them that their time is valuable and will be utilized in our work. Designed and Facilitated We will plan intentional meetings that include diverse perspectives and utilized participatory facilitation methods so that we can understand the problem in new ways and develop innovative solutions together. Accessible We will take into consideration barriers to participation when developing the plan to involve community and youth. Where possible, we will reduce barriers to those we want to be included in the conversation (e.g. transportation, language, ability, time of meeting). Builds New and Utilizes Existing Networks We will build new networks and utilize the existing networks of the Alliance and Alliance partner organizations when seeking to engage community and youth. We recognize the importance of building on already existing networks in the community in order to: Be connected to a broad set of communities, including specific cultural communities Build on, and be an asset to our partners Save time and effort Not duplicate efforts Engagement Procedures The Alliance is committed to developing thoughtful and intentional opportunities to engage young people and community. The engagement strategies chosen are determined by the project scope and impact. And may involve a single engagement opportunity or may involve many throughout the project s life cycle. Each project that the Alliance undertakes will use the following steps in order to determine and craft engagement strategies: 3

1. Draft Project Plan: Develop a project plan for the given project or idea to outline the intent of the project, and identify all action areas and steps that need to be done in order for the project to be successful in the short and long term. (See Alliance project plan template) 2. Outline Project Needs, Benefits and Risks: Identify opportunities to engage community and youth throughout the project that would enrich, inform and increase the success of the end product or initiative. Articulate the potential of engagement strategy, including all the possible positive and negative outcomes that could result from engaging. a. What is the scope of the problem? b. Whom does the problem impact? What are the needs? c. What are the risks and benefits of the engagement process? d. Is the impact of the project such that relationships with community and youth would be jeopardized if they are not involved in the development of the project? 3. Determine Level of Shared Decision-making: This is determined by weighing the needs and the amount of impact that the project will have on the community. The deeper the level of impact on the community and youth, the more deeply community and youth need to be in the development of the project. (See appendix 1 for shared decision-making matrix) 4. Plan Engagement Strategies: Develop a detailed plan for engagement that takes into consideration all of the contingencies and possible outcomes of engagement. These should be integral with the project plan, not an addendum. Utilize the engagement strategy that matches the determined level of shared decision. Ensure that the plan takes into consideration possible access barriers, time constraints for the project and budget constraints for the group and adheres to the protocols outlined in this policy. 5. Implement Project: Implement the project and use the results, where decided, to make strategic and financial decisions regarding our collective impact work. 4

Appendix 1: Levels of Shared Decision-making Based on the above protocols, each Alliance project will determine the level of shared decision-making that is needed in order for the project to be successful. Level Purpose Promise Inform A one-way communication intended to provide information about: Decisions that have already been made Addressing concerns in the community To follow up on previous outreach efforts To celebrate success We will provide you with the information you need to know. We will utilize multiple methods to communicate messages important to community and youth. Consult Collaborate Empower To seek feedback from community and youth regarding specific projects, topics or strategies of the Alliance: If we already have parameters around what we can/can t do for the project If the project or initiative has a smaller impact on the community To co-create projects and initiatives with community and youth who have a stake in or will be impacted by the outcome. Engagement happens throughout the development, planning and implementation processes. Engagement will direct and guide the project s process and end result This is a two-way dialogue Community and youth will be given opportunities and space to create their own projects when the Alliance has a need for solutions that they don t have the capacity or expertise to develop. We will take your input into consideration when making our final decision or building the design. We may choose not to act on some specific recommendations. We will circle back with you to let you know the final results of the project or initiative. We will allow the feedback and recommendations from community and youth to change our plans and the shape of the projects. We will work alongside community and youth, share power and develop projects collaboratively and equitably. The Alliance will only use this strategy if it is our intent to work alongside these groups to ensure that what s developed can be implemented. 5