Deborah Hargis Instructor profile () No. of responses = 42

Similar documents
Survey Evaluation Results

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Shelters Elementary School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Effective practices of peer mentors in an undergraduate writing intensive course

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Joe Public ABC Company

Educational Attainment

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Raw Data Files Instructions

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Abu Dhabi Indian. Parent Survey Results

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Developing a College-level Speed and Accuracy Test

12-month Enrollment

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Cooper Upper Elementary School

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

University of Arizona

Please complete these two forms, sign them, and return them to us in the enclosed pre paid envelope.

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)


The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

46 Children s Defense Fund

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Aalya School. Parent Survey Results

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Abu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

USE OF ONLINE PUBLIC ACCESS CATALOGUE IN GURU NANAK DEV UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, AMRITSAR: A STUDY

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Question bank for course evaluation

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Data Diskette & CD ROM

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

BARUCH RANKINGS: *Named Standout Institution by the

Group Assignment: Software Evaluation Model. Team BinJack Adam Binet Aaron Jackson

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

OUCH! That Stereotype Hurts Cultural Competence & Linguistic Training Summary of Evaluation Results June 30, 2014

Austin Community College SYLLABUS

Long Beach Unified School District

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY

AMERICA READS*COUNTS PROGRAM EVALUATION. School Year

Best Colleges Main Survey

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

Transportation Equity Analysis

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Arden Middle Secondary Main Report

The Impact of Physical Classroom Environment on Student Satisfaction and Student Evaluation of Teaching in the University Environment

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Emergency Medical Technician Course Application

The Impact of Formative Assessment and Remedial Teaching on EFL Learners Listening Comprehension N A H I D Z A R E I N A S TA R A N YA S A M I

ACBSP Related Standards: #3 Student and Stakeholder Focus #4 Measurement and Analysis of Student Learning and Performance

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Principal vacancies and appointments

MINUTE TO WIN IT: NAMING THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES

What We Are Learning about Successful Programs In College Calculus

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

OPAC and User Perception in Law University Libraries in the Karnataka: A Study

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Transcription:

Deborah Hargis Instructor profile () No. of responses = Overall indicators. About the Instructor: + - av.=.7 dev.=0.6 Survey Results Legend Relative Frequencies of answers Std. Dev. Mean Question text Left pole % 0% 0% 0% % Right pole n=no. of responses av.=mean dev.=std. Dev. ab.=abstention Scale Histogram. About Me:.) My class standing is: Freshman (0-0 hours) 70.7% n= Sophomore (-60 hours).% More than 60 hours without any degree or certificate.% Earned certificate or associate degree 0% Earned bachelor degree or higher.%.) This semester I am enrolled in: - semester hours 9.% n= 6-9 semester hours 9% 0- semester hours.7% - semester hours.% More than semester hours.%.) I am predominantly: A day student 9.% n=9 An evening student 7.7%.) I have a job at which I work: - hours per week 0% n=0-0 hours per week.% -6 hours per week 0% More than 6 hours per week % Not employed.% 07/0/0 Class Climate evaluation Page

.) I am a: Male.% n=7 Female 6.8%.6) I am: White Non-Hispanic 0% n=0 Black Non-Hispanic 0% Hispanic 0% Asian or Pacific Islander 0% American Indian 0%.7) I am enrolled in this course because it is: Required for my major 6% n=0 Required for general education 7.% Required for my job 0% An elective course 7.% For personal improvement 0%.8) This class was taught: Online 0% n=0 In a classroom 00%. About the Instructor:.) The instructor communicated the subject matter clearly. 78% 9.8% 9.8%.% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n= av.=.6 dev.=0.77.) The instructor's lectures and classroom activities helped me to learn the material. 7.8%.%.9% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n= av.=.6 dev.=0.7.) The instructor provided me with a course syllabus. 9.9% 7.% 0% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n= av.=.9 dev.=0.6.) The instructor spoke clearly and understandably. 78.6% 6.7%.%.% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n= av.=.7 dev.=0.6.) The instructor was genuinely interested in teaching. 90% 0% 0% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=0 av.=.9 dev.=0. 07/0/0 Class Climate evaluation Page

.6) The instructor showed enthusiasm for encouraging student learning. Deborah Hargis, Instructor profile 8.6%.8%.6% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=9 av.=.8 dev.=0..7) The instructor was accessible for consultation (e. g. question, calls, emails, etc.) 70% 7.%.% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=0 av.=.68 dev.=0..8) The instructor was impartial in evaluating my performance. 70.7% 9.8% 9.8%.9%.9% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n= av.=.7 dev.=.6.9) The instructor treated me fairly. 8.% 9.8%.9% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n= av.=.8 dev.=0..0) The instructor created an atmosphere in which I felt comfortable asking questions. 80% % 0% % 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=0 av.=.6 dev.=0.87.) The instructor considered opposing viewpoints. 7.% 7.9% 7.7% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=9 av.=.67 dev.=0.6. About the Course:.) Overall, the course was a valuable learning experience. 7.% 7.9%.% 0%.6% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=9 av.=.6 dev.=0.8.) The course covered what the course description said it would. 8.6%.8%.6% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=8 av.=.79 dev.=0.7.) Expectations were clearly stated either verbally or in the syllabus. 8.% 8.9% 0% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=7 av.=.8 dev.=0..) The criteria used to assess student work were clear. 67.% 0%.% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=0 av.=.6 dev.=0..) The workload was comparable to other courses at this level. 6.%.7% 7.9%.% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=8 av.=. dev.=0.86. About the Campus: 07/0/0 Class Climate evaluation Page

.) The size and layout of the classroom/laboratory are appropriate. Deborah Hargis, Instructor profile 77.% 0%.% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=0 av.=.7 dev.=0.9.) The student furniture (desks/tables/chairs) of the classroom is appropriate. 79.%.%.6% 0%.6% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=9 av.=.69 dev.=0.77.) Technology/resources are appropriate to support learning. 7.8% 0.%.6%.% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=9 av.=.9 dev.=0.79.) The Odessa College campus is clean and neat. 68.%.7% 7.9% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=8 av.=.6 dev.=0.6. Feedback/Comments Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey! 07/0/0 Class Climate evaluation Page

Profile Compilation: Instructor profile.) The instructor communicated the subject matter clearly. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n= av.=.6.) The instructor's lectures and classroom activities helped me to learn the material. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n= av.=.6.) The instructor provided me with a course syllabus. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.) The instructor spoke clearly and understandably. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.) The instructor was genuinely interested in teaching. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.6) The instructor showed enthusiasm for encouraging student learning. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n= av.=.9 n= av.=.7 n=0 av.=.9 n=9 av.=.8.7) The instructor was accessible for consultation (e.g. question, calls, emails, etc.) Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=0 av.=.68.8) The instructor was impartial in evaluating my performance. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.9) The instructor treated me fairly. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n= av.=.7 n= av.=.8.0) The instructor created an atmosphere in which I felt comfortable asking questions. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=0 av.=.6.) The instructor considered opposing viewpoints. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.) Overall, the course was a valuable learning experience. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.) The course covered what the course description said it would. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.) Expectations were clearly stated either verbally or in the syllabus. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.) The criteria used to assess student work were clear. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.) The workload was comparable to other courses at this level. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.) The size and layout of the classroom/laboratory are appropriate. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.) The student furniture (desks/tables/chairs) of the classroom is appropriate. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.) Technology/resources are appropriate to support learning. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree.) The Odessa College campus is clean and neat. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree n=9 av.=.67 n=9 av.=.6 n=8 av.=.79 n=7 av.=.8 n=0 av.=.6 n=8 av.=. n=0 av.=.7 n=9 av.=.69 n=9 av.=.9 n=8 av.=.6 07/0/0 Class Climate evaluation Page

Profile Compilation: Instructor profile. About the Instructor: + - av.=.7 07/0/0 Class Climate evaluation Page 6