School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

---- ---- Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning 2800 Nicolaus Rd., Ste. 100 Lincoln, CA 95648-1757 (916) 408-5200 Grades K-12 Cynthia Wood, EdD, Superintendent/CEO cwood@hcs.k12.ca.us http://horizoncharterschools.org 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card Published During the 2015-16 School Year School Description Welcome to the School Accountability Report Card (SARC) for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning (Partners)! ---- ---- Western Placer Unified School District 600 Sixth St #400 Lincoln (916) 645-6350 http://www.wpusd.k12.ca.us School Governing Board Michelle Johnson, President Sara Infante, Parent Representative Andrea Rynberk, Parent Representative Karen Vicari, Parent Representative Kimberly Dahlstrom, Parent Representative Bob Collins, Community Representative School Administration Cynthia Wood, EdD Superintendent/CEO Kelly Collins, Interim, Assistant Superintendent, Educational Services/CAO The contents of this accountability document fulfills state and federal disclosure requirements. Parents and community members will find valuable information about Partner s academic achievement; student performance and progress standardized testing, professional staff; qualification and development, parental involvement, school climate and pupil engagement. This charter was approved as a K-12 public school in 2010. Partnerships for Student Centered Learning is chartered through Western Placer Unified School District, and is the second charter within Horizon Charter Schools. Partners is a non-classroom based charter school that operates under independent study regulations. Mission Statement The mission and focus of Quality Education through Personalized Learning is the cornerstone of all education service delivery, at Partnerships for Student Centered Learning, allowing students the opportunity to pursue a wide variety of learning choices and modalities. Parent driven education is guided by professional teaching and administrative staff. Partner s students are well-prepared for the challenges of the 21st century. School Profile Partnerships for Student Centered Learning (Partners) was established in 2010 and is chartered through the sponsoring district, Western Placer Unified School District. Partners serves over 1000 students in grades Kindergarten through twelfth grade (12th) grades, providing Quality Education through Personalized Learning. Our students reside within six counties: Placer, Nevada, Sutter, Yuba, Sacramento, and El Dorado. Partners provides support to students and parents through cooperative classes, online support and distance learning, special education, and a credentialed teaching staff. Terri McGill, Assistant Superintendent, Administrative Services/COO Daniel Schuler, Assistant Superintendent, Business Services/CBO 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 1 of 14

About the SARC By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school at (916) 408-5200 or the district office. 2014-15 Student Enrollment by Grade Level Grade Level Number of Students Kindergarten 59 Grade 1 46 Grade 2 59 Grade 3 65 Grade 4 70 Grade 5 53 Grade 6 60 Grade 7 71 Grade 8 98 Grade 9 72 Grade 10 126 Grade 11 154 Grade 12 192 Total Enrollment 1,125 2014-15 Student Enrollment by Group Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American 3.5 American Indian or Alaska Native 2 Asian 2.3 Filipino 1 Hispanic or Latino 25.5 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.1 White 63 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 56.6 English Learners 8.4 Students with Disabilities 17 Foster Youth 0.3 A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair. Teacher Credentials Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning 13-14 14-15 15-16 With Full Credential 189 159 119 Without Full Credential 0 0 0 Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 0 0 0 Western Placer Unified School District 13-14 14-15 15-16 With Full Credential Without Full Credential Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions at this School Partnerships for Student- 13-14 14-15 15-16 Teachers of English Learners 3 Total Teacher Misassignments 3 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 * Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers 2014-15 Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Location of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 22.5 77.5 Districtwide All Schools 32.3 67.7 High-Poverty Schools 25.8 74.2 Low-Poverty Schools 97.9 2.1 * High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 2 of 14

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2015-16) Core Curriculum Area Textbooks and Instructional Materials Year and month in which data were collected: August 2015 Reading/Language Arts K-5 California Reading, Houghton Mifflin / 2003 & 2010 6-12 Pearson Literature for California / 2010 Textbooks and Instructional Materials/Year of Adoption Mathematics K-8 California Go Math!, Houghton Mifflin / 2015 9-12 Big Ideas, Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2 / 2014 HS PreCalculus, FLVS / 2014 Science K-5 California Science, Macmillan McGraw-Hill / 2008 6 California Earth Science, Holt / 2007 7 California Life Science, Holt / 2007 8 California Physical Science, Holt / 2007 HS Earth Science, Pearson Prentice Hall CA / 2006 HS Biology, Pearson Prentice Hall CA / 2007 HS Physical Science: Concepts in Action, Pearson Prentice Hall / 2009 HS Chemistry, Holt California / 2007 History-Social Science K-5 California Vistas, Macmillan McGraw-Hill / 2007 6 Discovering Our Past, Ancient Civilizations, Glencoe / 2006 7 Discovering Our Past, Medeival and Early Modern Times, Glencoe / 2006 8 Discovering Our Past, The American Journey, Glencoe / 2006 HS World History: Modern Times, Glencoe CA / 2006 HS U.S. History, The American Vision: Modern Times, Glencoe CA / 2006 HS American Government, Prentice Hall Magruder s / 2006 HS Economics: Principles and Practices, Glencoe / 2005 Foreign Language HS Spanish: Realidades 1, Pearson Prentice Hall / 2005 HS Spanish: Realidades 2, Pearson Prentice Hall / 2005 Health Visual and Performing Arts Science Laboratory Equipment HS course uses current research article and videos available on line. HS Art Introduction: Students will research topics, artists, and art examples using Internet and local library services. All labs are fully equipped each year. Lab equipment is regularly maintained. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 3 of 14

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year) Horizon Charter Schools (HCS) is an independent-study based educational program and therefore does not maintain traditional school district site facilities. HCS does maintain Learning Centers in Auburn, Placerville, Lincoln, Roseville, Sacramento and Elk Grove. All of the Learning Center sites are lease only facilities and the underlying rental agreements require the lessors to maintain the facilities in proper condition for the programs maintained at those facilities. System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: Repair Status Good Fair Poor Overall Rating Exemplary Good Fair Poor ---------- Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP], Science California s Tests); and The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study Subject 2014-15 CAASPP Results for All Students Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State s (grades 3-8 and 11) School District State ELA 41 50 44 Math 18 40 33 * Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Subject CAASPP Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State 12-13 13-14 14-15 12-13 13-14 14-15 12-13 13-14 14-15 Science 47 58 40 67 68 67 59 60 56 * Results are for grades 5, 8, and 10. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Grade Level 2014-15 Percent of Students Meeting Fitness s 4 of 6 5 of 6 6 of 6 ---5--- 20.80 33.30 41.70 ---7--- 22.90 37.10 28.60 ---9--- 22.70 36.40 31.80 * Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 4 of 14

2014-15 CAASPP Results by Student Group Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) All Students in the LEA 67 All Student at the School 40 Male 43 Female 38 Black or African American -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- Asian -- Filipino -- 2014-15 CAASPP Results by Student Group Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) Hispanic or Latino 43 White 38 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 17 English Learners -- Students with Disabilities 36 Foster Youth -- * Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. School Year 2014-15 CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA) Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven All Students Student Group Grade Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Not Percent of Students Nearly Exceeded 3 65 51 78.5 39 25 20 12 4 66 57 86.4 49 21 16 11 5 52 39 75.0 41 21 23 10 6 68 59 86.8 46 19 25 3 7 82 67 81.7 34 28 33 3 8 111 92 82.9 32 17 37 8 11 173 145 83.8 14 21 33 23 Male 3 30 46.2 43 27 20 7 4 30 45.5 57 17 20 3 5 18 34.6 50 28 11 6 6 30 44.1 50 27 10 3 7 33 40.2 36 21 36 3 8 39 35.1 31 21 33 8 11 68 39.3 21 22 35 16 Female 3 21 32.3 33 24 19 19 4 27 40.9 41 26 11 19 5 21 40.4 33 14 33 14 6 29 42.6 41 10 41 3 7 34 41.5 32 35 29 3 8 53 47.7 32 15 40 8 11 77 44.5 9 19 31 30 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 5 of 14

School Year 2014-15 CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA) Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven Student Group Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Grade Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Not Percent of Students Nearly Exceeded 3 1 1.5 -- -- -- -- 4 1 1.5 -- -- -- -- 5 1 1.9 -- -- -- -- 6 3 4.4 -- -- -- -- 7 2 2.4 -- -- -- -- 8 4 3.6 -- -- -- -- 11 3 1.7 -- -- -- -- 3 2 3.1 -- -- -- -- 4 2 3.0 -- -- -- -- 6 1 1.5 -- -- -- -- 7 2 2.4 -- -- -- -- 8 2 1.8 -- -- -- -- 11 3 1.7 -- -- -- -- 3 2 3.1 -- -- -- -- 4 1 1.5 -- -- -- -- 5 1 1.9 -- -- -- -- 7 2 2.4 -- -- -- -- 8 4 3.6 -- -- -- -- 11 4 2.3 -- -- -- -- 3 1 1.5 -- -- -- -- 5 1 1.9 -- -- -- -- 7 1 1.2 -- -- -- -- 8 1 0.9 -- -- -- -- 11 2 1.2 -- -- -- -- 3 14 21.5 29 43 21 7 4 18 27.3 61 17 17 6 5 8 15.4 -- -- -- -- 6 16 23.5 69 13 13 6 7 23 28.0 43 39 13 0 8 24 21.6 46 17 29 4 11 40 23.1 20 13 33 25 7 1 1.2 -- -- -- -- 11 2 1.2 -- -- -- -- 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 6 of 14

White Two or More Races Student Group Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities Foster Youth School Year 2014-15 CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA) Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven Grade Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Not Percent of Students Nearly Exceeded 3 29 44.6 45 24 14 14 4 33 50.0 48 21 15 9 5 28 53.8 46 21 18 11 6 38 55.9 39 24 29 3 7 35 42.7 26 26 43 6 8 56 50.5 30 16 36 9 11 87 50.3 14 25 32 22 11 0 0.0 -- -- -- -- 3 29 44.6 45 24 24 7 4 34 51.5 47 21 21 9 5 26 50.0 42 15 31 8 6 36 52.9 44 17 28 6 7 46 56.1 30 30 37 0 8 57 51.4 33 19 40 2 11 80 46.2 15 20 35 23 3 4 6.2 -- -- -- -- 4 5 7.6 -- -- -- -- 5 6 11.5 -- -- -- -- 6 5 7.4 -- -- -- -- 7 9 11.0 -- -- -- -- 8 5 4.5 -- -- -- -- 11 12 6.9 42 17 25 8 3 5 7.7 -- -- -- -- 4 14 21.2 64 14 14 0 5 7 13.5 -- -- -- -- 6 12 17.6 75 8 0 0 7 15 18.3 53 20 20 0 8 13 11.7 31 8 31 8 11 15 8.7 53 27 7 7 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- 6 -- -- -- -- -- -- 7 -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 11 -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 7 of 14

School Year 2014-15 CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven Student Group All Students Male Female Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Grade Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Not Percent of Students Nearly 3 65 52 80.0 42 29 21 6 4 66 56 84.8 52 30 11 5 5 52 38 73.1 42 42 8 5 6 68 59 86.8 53 36 0 5 7 82 67 81.7 39 33 19 6 Exceeded 8 111 94 84.7 54 19 6 14 11 173 137 79.2 53 24 12 4 3 31 47.7 32 32 26 6 4 29 43.9 59 24 14 3 5 18 34.6 28 50 11 6 6 30 44.1 60 20 0 7 7 32 39.0 41 28 19 9 8 40 36.0 50 20 5 18 11 66 38.2 64 18 11 8 3 21 32.3 57 24 14 5 4 27 40.9 44 37 7 7 5 20 38.5 55 35 5 5 6 29 42.6 45 52 0 3 7 35 42.7 37 37 20 3 8 54 48.6 57 19 7 11 11 71 41.0 42 30 14 1 3 1 1.5 -- -- -- -- 4 1 1.5 -- -- -- -- 5 0 0.0 -- -- -- -- 6 3 4.4 -- -- -- -- 7 2 2.4 -- -- -- -- 8 5 4.5 -- -- -- -- 11 3 1.7 -- -- -- -- 3 2 3.1 -- -- -- -- 4 2 3.0 -- -- -- -- 6 1 1.5 -- -- -- -- 7 2 2.4 -- -- -- -- 8 2 1.8 -- -- -- -- 11 3 1.7 -- -- -- -- 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 8 of 14

School Year 2014-15 CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven Student Group Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Grade Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Not Percent of Students Nearly Exceeded 3 2 3.1 -- -- -- -- 4 1 1.5 -- -- -- -- 5 1 1.9 -- -- -- -- 7 2 2.4 -- -- -- -- 8 4 3.6 -- -- -- -- 11 4 2.3 -- -- -- -- 3 1 1.5 -- -- -- -- 5 1 1.9 -- -- -- -- 7 1 1.2 -- -- -- -- 8 1 0.9 -- -- -- -- 11 2 1.2 -- -- -- -- 3 14 21.5 29 43 21 7 4 18 27.3 61 22 17 0 5 8 15.4 -- -- -- -- 6 16 23.5 56 38 0 6 7 23 28.0 43 43 9 0 8 24 21.6 63 29 4 4 11 37 21.4 59 24 11 0 7 1 1.2 -- -- -- -- 11 2 1.2 -- -- -- -- 3 30 46.2 50 20 20 7 4 32 48.5 53 25 9 9 5 28 53.8 46 32 11 7 6 38 55.9 55 34 0 5 7 35 42.7 34 31 20 11 8 57 51.4 54 14 7 18 11 82 47.4 54 26 11 5 11 0 0.0 -- -- -- -- 3 29 44.6 52 28 17 3 4 33 50.0 45 33 18 3 5 25 48.1 36 48 12 4 6 36 52.9 50 39 0 8 7 47 57.3 34 38 17 6 8 58 52.3 53 21 7 12 11 76 43.9 53 29 11 3 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 9 of 14

English Learners Student Group Students with Disabilities Foster Youth School Year 2014-15 CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven Grade Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Not Percent of Students Nearly Exceeded 3 4 6.2 -- -- -- -- 4 5 7.6 -- -- -- -- 5 6 11.5 -- -- -- -- 6 5 7.4 -- -- -- -- 7 9 11.0 -- -- -- -- 8 5 4.5 -- -- -- -- 11 12 6.9 92 8 0 0 3 6 9.2 -- -- -- -- 4 13 19.7 69 8 23 0 5 6 11.5 -- -- -- -- 6 12 17.6 67 8 0 0 7 15 18.3 53 20 13 7 8 14 12.6 64 7 0 7 11 15 8.7 87 0 7 0 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- 6 -- -- -- -- -- -- 7 -- -- -- -- -- -- 8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 11 -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement With parents serving as the primary facilitator of their child s education, parents work very closely with their Supervising Teacher and other school staff in the development and implementation of their child s personalized learning plan. Parents oversee the daily engagement of their child s learning and are an integral part of the student s success. Parents have many opportunities for involvement in our school. These activities include: participation in parent guided field trips, regional events, LCAP, Parent Education Nights, professional development opportunities, ELA adoption committee, College and Career Fairs, College Readiness Workshops, high school planning/orientation night for 8th graders, school newsletter, student recognition events, monthly meetings with their Supervising Teacher, parent representatives on the School Board. Parents interested in additional opportunities for involvement are encouraged to call the school at (916) 408-5200. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 10 of 14

State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates, pupil expulsion rates; and other local measures on the sense of safety. School Safety Plan Horizon Charter Schools (HCS) School Safety Plan is reviewed and discussed by HCS's Safety Committee annually. The Safety Committee is comprised of Administration and Education staff. The Safety Committee provides direction through the HCS Organizational Chart to appropriate administrative staff for them to communicate to the entire HCS staff any and all applicable changes to the School Safety Plan. Suspensions and Expulsions School 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Suspensions Rate 0.65 0.51 0.65 Expulsions Rate 0.00 0.00 0.00 District 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Suspensions Rate 3.45 3.65 3.19 Expulsions Rate 0.13 0.08 0.00 State 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Suspensions Rate 5.07 4.36 3.80 Expulsions Rate 0.13 0.10 0.09 D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. 2014-15 Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria AYP Criteria School District State English Language Arts Participation Rate No Yes Yes Percent Proficient N/A N/A N/A Mathematics Participation Rate No Yes Yes Percent Proficient N/A N/A N/A Made AYP Overall No Yes Yes Attendance Rate Yes Yes Yes Graduation Rate Yes Yes Yes Average Class Size Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) 2015-16 Federal Intervention Program Indicator School District Program Improvement Status No In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2011-2012 Year in Program Improvement Year 3 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 4 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 66.7 Number of Classrooms* 1-20 21-32 33+ Grade 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Average Class Size Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) Number of Classrooms* 1-22 23-32 33+ Subject 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 English 3 192 2 Math--- 4 173 2 Science 4 123 2 SS----- 3 172 2 * Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 11 of 14

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff at this School Number of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Academic Counselor------- 3 Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) 0 Library Media Teacher (Librarian) 0 Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) 3 Psychologist------- 3 Social Worker------- 0 Nurse------- 1 Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 1 Resource Specialist------- 9 Other------- 0 Average Number of Students per Staff Member Academic Counselor------- 350 * One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Professional Development provided for Teachers The current Horizon Charter Schools professional development plan is aligned to LCAP goals, Charter authorizations, WASC Action Plans, and other guiding documents. The plan was created by referring to these documents and analyzing i-ready and CAASPP data to determine the focus areas for professional development for 2015-2016 as well as by looking back at past professional development to ensure that initiatives were continued and supported. For example, math professional development is a continued initiative. For historical professional development information, please see attachment. The plan will focus on: FY 2013-14 Teacher and Administrative Salaries Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $34,581 $42,315 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $64,797 $66,451 Highest Teacher Salary $85,208 $85,603 Average Principal Salary (ES) $94,098 $105,079 Average Principal Salary (MS) $97,343 $111,005 Average Principal Salary (HS) $108,366 $121,310 Superintendent Salary $156,004 $189,899 Percent of District Budget Teacher Salaries 42% 39% Administrative Salaries 5% 6% * For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. 1. continuing professional development and coaching for the new California Common Core State s for Mathematics Math Coach 30% FTE trains and supports teachers in implementing math standards: large and small group training, individual and team coaching October 2015 Teacher Inservice : 1 hour math Learning Progression Training 4 Demonstration / Training Days contracted with Sacramento State Math Project for 2015-2016 school year 3 Day Math Training: Building Abilities for Sense-Making and Making Arguments in Mathematics, May 2016 on-going curriculum training for teachers and parents 2. beginning focused professional development with the California Common Core State s for English Language Arts s & Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects October 23, 2015 Teacher Inservice: 3 hours Writing training November, December, January Certificated Staff Meetings: 45 minutes Academic Vocabulary training at each meeting January and February: Parent Training 1 hour each month 3. beginning professional development with the new California English Language Development s October 2015 Certificated Staff Meetings: 1.5 hour overview training November, December, January Certificated Staff Meetings: 45 minutes Academic Vocabulary training at each meeting Supporting all 3 PD focus Areas: i-ready Online Diagnostic and Instruction Program Teacher Training: Getting Started Webinar 1.5 hours, Understanding Data 3 hours at October Inservice, additional followup training schedule as needed In addition new teachers are trained and supported through the PCOE BTSA or Teacher Induction program. FY 2013-14 Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries Level Expenditures Per Pupil Total Restricted Unrestricted Average Teacher Salary School Site- $7,838 $870 $6,968 $63,212 District------ $68,795 State------- $5,348 $69,257 Percent Difference: School Site/District -8.1 Percent Difference: School Site/ State 30.3-8.7 * Cells with do not require data. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 12 of 14

Group 2014-15 California High School Exit Examination Grade Ten Results by Student Group English-Language Arts Mathematics Not Proficient Proficient Advanced Not Proficient Proficient Advanced All Students in the LEA 39 29 32 49 36 15 All Students at the School 51 28 21 68 24 8 Male 56 25 19 60 26 13 Female 47 31 2222 74 21 4 Hispanic or Latino 64 27 9 82 15 3 White 46 28 26 62 25 13 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 50 29 21 69 22 10 Students with Disabilities 85 12 4 83 13 4 * Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. CAHSEE Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced Partnerships for Student-Centered 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 English-Language Arts 58 66 49 Mathematics 49 55 32 Western Placer Unified School District 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 English-Language Arts 58 34 61 Mathematics 57 33 51 California 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 English-Language Arts 57 56 58 Mathematics 60 62 59 * Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Partnerships for Student-Centered 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Dropout Rate 12.80 13.80 13.70 Graduation Rate 75.19 77.63 68.00 Western Placer Unified School District 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Dropout Rate 6.20 7.50 7.70 Graduation Rate 90.05 87.67 87.27 California 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Dropout Rate 13.10 11.40 11.50 Graduation Rate 78.87 80.44 80.95 Career Technical Education Participation Measure CTE Program Participation Number of pupils participating in CTE 0 % of pupils completing a CTE program and earning a high school diploma % of CTE courses sequenced or articulated between the school and institutions of postsecondary education 0 0 Completion of High School Graduation Requirements Group Graduating Class of 2014 School District State All Students 80.72 81.37 84.6 Black or African American 46.15 62.5 76 American Indian or Alaska Native 100 92.86 78.07 Asian 100 92.62 Filipino 100 85.71 96.49 Hispanic or Latino 76.32 75.25 81.28 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 100 83.58 White 85.44 84.17 89.93 Two or More Races 90.91 82.8 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 76.47 64.89 61.28 English Learners 88.89 67.44 50.76 Students with Disabilities 211.63 97.67 81.36 Foster Youth -- -- -- Courses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) Admission UC/CSU Course Measure 2014-15 Students Enrolled in Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 2013-14 Graduates Who Completed All Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission Percent 34.46 2.99 DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 13 of 14

Subject Computer Science 2014-15 Advanced Placement Courses Number of AP Courses Offered* Percent of Students In AP Courses English------- 2 Fine and Performing Arts Foreign Language 1 Mathematics 1 Science------- Social Science Subject 2014-15 Advanced Placement Courses Number of AP Courses Offered* Percent of Students In AP Courses All courses 4.2 * Where there are student course enrollments. Career Technical Education Programs Students are afforded access to valid CTE courses through regional county CTE programs Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. 2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning Page 14 of 14