Grade 1 Reading Student Learning Objective (SLO) Template This template should be completed while referring to the SLO Template Checklist.

Similar documents
Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Port Jervis City School District Academic Intervention Services (AIS) Plan

Guided Reading with A SPECIAL DAY written and illustrated by Anne Sibley O Brien

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

The Effect of Close Reading on Reading Comprehension. Scores of Fifth Grade Students with Specific Learning Disabilities.

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Upper Moreland School District. Title I Professional Development Opportunities

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

EQuIP Review Feedback

Plainfield Public School District Reading/3 rd Grade Curriculum Guide. Modifications/ Extensions (How will I differentiate?)

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

2nd Grade Media. Goal #1: Inquiry EO #1 - UBD

Bebop Books Page 1. Guided Reading with SPLASH! written by Dinah Johnson photographed by Maria Victoria Torrey

Clarkstown Central School District. Response to Intervention & Academic Intervention Services District Plan

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Workshop 5 Teaching Writing as a Process

QUESTIONS and Answers from Chad Rice?

RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT ONE BALANCED LITERACY PLATFORM

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

Reynolds School District Literacy Framework

LITERACY-6 ESSENTIAL UNIT 1 (E01)

Pyramid. of Interventions

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

Critical Decisions within Student Learning Objectives: Target Setting Model

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

Test Blueprint. Grade 3 Reading English Standards of Learning

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Special Education Services Program/Service Descriptions

2010 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

Transportation Equity Analysis

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

REQUIRED TEXTS Woods, M. & Moe, A.J. (2011). Analytical Reading Inventory with Readers Passages (9 th edition). Prentice Hall.

Implementation. Journal of Reading Recovery Spring 2005

UNIT PLANNING TEMPLATE

Literacy Instruction in Early Childhood Education: Ohio s Third Grade Reading Guarantee

WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN TO PAY ATTENTION?

Executive Summary. Abraxas Naperville Bridge. Eileen Roberts, Program Manager th St Woodridge, IL

K-12 Math & ELA Updates. Education Committee August 8, 2017

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report


Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

A Pilot Study on Pearson s Interactive Science 2011 Program

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

North Carolina Information and Technology Essential Standards

SY MEASURES OF STUDENT LEARNING (MOSL) SELECTIONS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (GRADES K-5) SUPPLEMENT

Plattsburgh City School District SIP Building Goals

Case Study of Struggling Readers

UASCS Summer Planning Committee

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

Sample from: 'State Studies' Product code: STP550 The entire product is available for purchase at STORYPATH.

Reading Comprehension Lesson Plan

ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Discipline

Comprehensive Progress Report

SY School Performance Plan

Leveled Literacy Intervention

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series

Printable Poetry Task Cards

Common Core Standards Alignment Chart Grade 5

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

How To: Structure Classroom Data Collection for Individual Students

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Parent Academy. Common Core & PARCC

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Hokulani Elementary School

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

Writing Functional Ot Goals In Snf

An Assessment of the Dual Language Acquisition Model. On Improving Student WASL Scores at. McClure Elementary School at Yakima, Washington.

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

GRANT WOOD ELEMENTARY School Improvement Plan

Sidney Sawyer Elementary School

Achievement Testing Program Guide. Spring Iowa Assessment, Form E Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT), Form 7

Writing Functional Dysphagia Goals

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

Luke O'Toole Elementary School

Language Arts Methods

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Robert Bennis Elementary School

Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School

Houghton Mifflin Online Assessment System Walkthrough Guide

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Ohio Valley University New Major Program Proposal Template

Cooper Upper Elementary School

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

School Leadership Rubrics

Publisher Citations. Program Description. Primary Supporting Y N Universal Access: Teacher s Editions Adjust on the Fly all grades:

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

A Critique of Running Records

Emergency Safety Interventions: Requirements

Transcription:

Student Learning Objective (SLO) Template This template should be completed while referring to the SLO Template Checklist. Teacher Name: Content Area /Course(s): Reading Grade Levels: 1 Academic Year: 2012 2013 Baseline and Trend Data What information is being used to inform the creation of the SLO and establish the amount of growth that should take place? Results indicate reading level rates as assessed through benchmarks established through Fountas and Pinnell Reading Levels. Students in our school are assessed quarterly in each of the primary grades (K 3) using reading benchmark books available through the OSU Literacy Collaborative program. Specific recommended on grade level reading level targets are given in the program. Our building teachers assess each student on this measure by using a running record and questioning. This performance indicates a reading comprehension level for each student. We create an information card that is placed in each student s cum folder. All of the child s teachers (presently or in the future) have access to this information. Results of running record assessments of kindergarteners (assessed in spring of kdg. year) entering my first grade class number of students at each level: Below Grade Level Pre reading behaviors: 2 Level A: 3 On Grade Level Level B: 9 Level C: 6 Above Grade Level Level D: 2 Level J: 3 Level K: 1 A careful analysis of the running record data show that Students reading at below grade level expectations are struggling with meaning, structure, and visual issues when reading fiction and nonfiction text. Students reading on grade level expectation are struggling with meaning and structure, but perform well with using visual cues when reading. Students reading above grade level expectations are using structural and visual cues when reading, and have rare occurrences with meaning issues. Student Population Which students will be included in this SLO? Include course, grade level, and number of students. My first grade class consists of 26 first graders.

Two students have IEPs and receive accommodations and modifications per their IEP (extended time and modification of assignments). One student identified as English Language Learners will receive support from the ELL specialist who will collaborate with the general educator to ensure that the student s needs are met. Interval of Instruction What is the duration of the course that the SLO will cover? Include beginning and end dates. September 1, 2012 April 25, 2013 Standards and Content What content will the SLO target? To what related standards is the SLO aligned? This SLO encompasses all areas of Ohio s newest Reading Standards for Literature, Informational Text, and Foundational Skills. For those students reading at the kdg. level, the kdg. standards will be emphasized and the student s progress monitored so that first grade reading standards are taught when the student is ready. Students reading at the grade one level will be taught on grade 1 standards. Those students reading above grade level will receive instruction on the grade two reading standards. All standards will be taught (thus they are not listed individually here) through whole class and small group instruction in order to differentiate instructional needs. Assessment(s) What assessment(s) will be used to measure student growth for this SLO? The F&P Text Level Gradient Based on their work in Reading Recovery and other comprehensive approaches that involved high impact interventions for struggling readers, Fountas and Pinnell match books to readers and to provide differentiated instruction through working with small groups in reading using a valuable tool the gradient of text from level A to Z+ (The F&P Text Level Gradient ) a tool created with teams of teachers in school districts almost thirty years ago. Fountas and Pinnell analyzed in great detail the text characteristics of fiction and nonfiction books at every level of the A to Z+ gradient to understand the demands of each level on the developing reader. Fountas and Pinnell's products and teachings are rooted in the work of Marie Clay whose meticulous study of the complexity of the reading process, through detailed coding of thousands of readings, showed that when a text is too difficult for the child the process breaks down and the child does not develop inner control of effective actions for processing texts. When the text poses enough challenge, but not too much, the child has opportunities with effective, explicit teaching to build his network of effective problem solving actions. Fountas and Pinnell's goal is to support the child's development of self initiating actions he will be able to apply to a range of texts of similar difficulty. With daily teaching, the teacher helps the child climb the ladder of text difficulty with success. The goal of guided reading is to bring the child to the level of complex texts appropriate for the grade, in doing so, teaching must begin with where the child is able to engage with some success, so that there is a point of contact, thereby engaging the child's development of a self extending system for processing texts. The Eight Components of Guided Reading (2010) align with the key tenets of the Common Core State Standards: 1. Complex, high level reading comprehension is the goal of guided reading instruction. 2. Guided reading centers on a sequence of high quality texts that support individual progress on a scale of spiraling text difficulty. 3. Guided reading lessons increase the volume of independent reading that students do; the goal always is confident, capable independent readers. 4. Guided reading provides explicit instruction in accurate, fluent reading. 5. Guiding reading lessons provide daily opportunities to expand academic vocabulary through reading, writing, conversation, and explicit instruction. 6. Guided reading lessons include teaching that expands students' ability to apply the concepts of print, phonological awareness, access to rich vocabulary, and accurate, fluent reading to the processing of print.

7. Guided reading lessons invite students to write about reading. 8. Guided reading lessons create engagement in and motivation for reading. In addition, an important key feature of the Common Core State Standards is to provide students with a grade by grade staircase of increasing text complexity and steady growth of comprehension. This text level gradient process is assessed through the use of an individually administered running record using specific, consistent benchmark texts of fiction and nonfiction. An accurate running record assessment includes questioning of student comprehension followed by an analysis of miscues and student performance. Growth Target(s) Considering all available data and content requirements, what growth target(s) can students be expected to reach? Using the text gradient chart provided below, each student will be expected to demonstrate one year of reading growth. For example, incoming first graders who are reading at a level C or D in the fall, would be expected to be reading at a level J by the end of the school year. Students reading below grade level will be expected to make one year of progress, and will students who are reading above grade level.

Percentage of students that met or exceededd growth target 90 100 80 89 70 79 60 69 59 or lesss 5 level rating Translated 3 level rating* Most Effective (5) Above Above Average (4) Average (3) Met Approaching Average (2) Least Effective (1) Below 2012 Irene C. Fountas and Gay Su S Pinnell The SLO will then be scored using the following rating scale, based on guidance from the Ohio Department off Education. Rationale for Growth Target(s) What is your rationale for setting the above target(s) for student growth within the interval of instruction? Using benchmark assessments and other systematic observation, the instructional reading level of each student is determined. The teacher forms a temporary group of students that are alike enough in their development of a reading processs that it makes sense to teach them together for a period of time. In selecting a text for the

group, the teacher uses the level designation; thinks about the strengths, needs, and background knowledge of the group; and analyzes the individual text for opportunities to support students' successful engagement with the meaning, language, and print of the text. The teacher uses the text to help the children expand what they know how to do as readers. This instructional approach is used in my classroom. The text level gradient assessment is chosen because it is reliable, rigorous, and research based. Reading on grade level is a necessity. Knowing research about a child s zone of proximal development, good, effective instruction is provided at the child s level. The instructional methods, assessments, and growth targets are chosen based upon research, baseline, and trend data. Administration and Scoring: How will evidence be collected and scored? Evidence of each child s reading performance will be noted on the individual running record. There is a specific training and protocol for using a running record (this requires specialized training). An individual reading card will record the child s progress. This card is stored in the cum folder. A class roster is maintained in my classroom of the children s reading levels. This will allow me to make instructional decisions.