CogAT Score Distributions nd and 5 th Grade

Similar documents
Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Transportation Equity Analysis

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Cooper Upper Elementary School

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Educational Attainment

Shelters Elementary School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Essentials of Ability Testing. Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Best Colleges Main Survey

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Denver Public Schools

University of Arizona

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

State of New Jersey

Hokulani Elementary School


THIS KIT CONTAINS ALL THE INFORMATION YOU NEED

12-month Enrollment

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Raw Data Files Instructions

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Legislative Counsel Bureau and Nevada Legislature 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV Equal Opportunity Employer

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Kahului Elementary School

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Cogat Sample Questions Grade 2

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

National Survey of Student Engagement

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

Idaho Public Schools

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

A Pilot Study on Pearson s Interactive Science 2011 Program

Academic Advising and Career Exploration. PLTW State Conference 2015 Bayless School District

Native American Education Board Update

Clark Lane Middle School

Review of Student Assessment Data

Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring SOSCA. Feedback Information

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Rural Education in Oregon

AMERICA READS*COUNTS PROGRAM EVALUATION. School Year

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

February 1, Dear Members of the Brown Community,

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Gifted & Talented. Dyslexia. Special Education. Updates. March 2015!

46 Children s Defense Fund

The Unequal Distribution of Economic Education: A Report on the Race, Ethnicity, and Gender of Economics Majors at US Colleges and Universities

2018 Great Ideas Conference SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM

MINUTE TO WIN IT: NAMING THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

El Toro Elementary School

Legacy of NAACP Salary equalization suits.

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Transcription:

CogAT Score Distributions 2011-12 2 nd and 5 th Grade The graphs above show the distribution of CogAT scores by race and income from 2011-12. They can be read just like a table, but with graphs instead of numbers. By reading across from left to right, you can see how different groups scored on each test. By reading from top to bottom, you can see how the same group scored on the three different tests. We present a distribution of scores rather than an average score because distributions provide greater detail about the performance of all students, not just average students. Each bar represents the percentage of students scoring at each level. Graphs with higher bars to the right represent better scores overall while graphs with higher bars to the left represent worse scores overall. Overall, white and high-income students score much better on the CogAT than their peers. However, within each racial or socioeconomic group, students score about the same on each of the three tests. Students scores on the three sections of the CogAT are very highly correlated. Prepared by Bo McCready 1 Report 2013-2-1

The Demographics of CogAT High Performers 2011-12, 2 nd and 5 th grade Verbal Verbal 9 Quantitative Quantitative 9 Nonverbal Nonverbal 9 Asian 76 7 130 44 109 24 African American 21 0 22 1 21 3 Hispanic 43 2 61 4 54 4 Native American 4 1 3 1 3 0 Two or more races 54 8 51 10 46 9 Pacific Islander 2 1 2 0 1 0 White 672 146 627 105 578 124 Low-income 123 14 150 22 148 22 Not low-income 743 151 740 141 657 142 Total 872 165 896 165 812 164 Verbal Verbal 9 Quantitative Quantitative 9 Nonverbal Nonverbal 9 Asian 9% 4% 15% 27% 13% 15% African American 2% 0% 2% 1% 3% 2% Hispanic 5% 1% 7% 2% 7% 2% Native American 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% Two or more races 6% 5% 6% 6% 6% 5% Pacific Islander 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% White 77% 88% 70% 64% 71% 76% Low-income 14% 8% 17% 13% 18% 13% Not low-income 85% 92% 83% 85% 81% 87% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Prepared by Bo McCready 2 Report 2013-2-1

The Characteristics of Students Identified by the CogAT ONLY, 2011-12 (5 th Grade Only) Scored Above 77 th %ile CogAT Verbal, Scored Above 77 th %ile CogAT Quantitative, Scored above 96 th %ile CogAT Verbal, Scored above 96 th %ile CogAT Quantitative, Below 75th %ile WKCE or MAP Below 75th %ile WKCE or MAP Below 95th %ile WKCE or MAP Below 95th %ile WKCE or MAP Asian Number 2 5 1 5 Percent 6% 8% 5% 24% African American Number 2 4 0 0 Percent 6% 7% 0% 0% Hispanic Number 1 14 0 1 Percent 3% 23% 0% 5% Native American Number 2 0 0 0 Percent 6% 0% 0% 0% Multiracial Number 2 5 2 0 Percent 6% 8% 9% 0% White Number 25 32 19 15 Percent 74% 53% 86% 71% Already TAG-identified Number 11 13 15 9 Percent 32% 22% 68% 43% Low-income Number 12 23 0 3 Percent 35% 38% 0% 14% English Language Learner Number 1 7 0 2 Percent 3% 12% 0% 10% Special Education Number 2 3 0 3 Percent 6% 5% 0% 14% Total 34 60 22 21 Students who score well on the CogAT but not the WKCE or MAP are largely white and not from low-income families. For example, of 34 5 th grade students who scored in stanines on the CogAT Reading but not above the 75 th percentile on MAP or WKCE reading, 25 were white and 12 were low-income. Prepared by Bo McCready 3 Report 2013-2-1

Students Identified by the CogAT Nonverbal 5 th grade, 95 th percentile WKCE or MAP, stanine 9 CogAT Nonverbal CogAT and Reading Nonverbal CogAT and Math WKCE only: 82 MAP only: 20 CogAT only: 30 WKCE & MAP only: 54 WKCE & CogAT only: 14 MAP & CogAT only: 11 All three: 18 WKCE only: 58 MAP only: 31 CogAT only: 27 WKCE & MAP only: 39 WKCE & CogAT only: 9 MAP & CogAT only: 10 All three: 28 These graphs show the number of students identified for TAG services by scoring above the 95 th percentile on WKCE or MAP Reading or Math or stanine 9 on the CogAT nonverbal. The CogAT nonverbal identified 30 students who were not identified by WKCE or MAP Reading and 27 students who were not identified by WKCE or MAP Math. Prepared by Bo McCready 4 Report 2013-2-1

Second Grade CogAT and Third Grade MAP Scores, 95 th Percentile MAP, Stanine 9 CogAT Verbal CogAT and Reading Quantitative CogAT and Math MAP 135 CogAT 71 Both 29 CogAT ONLY 39 MAP ONLY 106 MAP 96 CogAT 85 Both 36 CogAT ONLY 39 MAP ONLY 60 Nonverbal CogAT and Reading Nonverbal CogAT and Math MAP 135 CogAT 88 Both 34 CogAT ONLY 48 MAP ONLY 101 MAP 96 CogAT 88 Both 29 CogAT ONLY 51 MAP ONLY 67 These graphs and tables show the overlap between second grade CogAT scores from 2011-12 and the same students third grade MAP scores from the fall of 2012-13. Overall, 2,064 second grade students took the CogAT. The CogAT verbal identified 71 students not identified by the MAP. The CogAT quantitative identified 85 students not identified by the MAP. The CogAT nonverbal identified 88 students not identified by MAP reading and 88 students not identified by MAP math. Prepared by Bo McCready 5 Report 2013-2-1

Students Identified for Talent Development by the CogAT Nonverbal, 2011-12 75th percentile WKCE & MAP, 77th percentile (Stanine ) CogAT All Tested 5th Graders 1877 students WKCE or MAP, Math or Reading 75th percentile? YES 834 students NO 1043 students CogAT Nonverbal Stanine? YES 48 students YES 7 students Already Receiving TAG Services? NO 41 students NO 995 students 41 students out of 1877 were newly identified for TAG talent development by the CogAT nonverbal. Prepared by Bo McCready and Elizabeth Vaade, MMSD Research & Program Evaluation Office.