The Miner Way!!! Be Responsible, Be Respectful, and always Be Ready to Learn!

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Engage Educate Empower

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Val Verde Unified School District

Kahului Elementary School

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Shelters Elementary School

Val Verde Unified School District

Hokulani Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Cuero Independent School District

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

3/6/2009. Residence Halls & Strategic t Planning Overview. Residence Halls Overview. Residence Halls: Marapai Supai Kachina

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

STANISLAUS COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY CASE #08-04 LA GRANGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Clark Lane Middle School

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

World s Best Workforce Plan

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout

Educational Attainment

INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS SURVEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEVEL RLA/ELD WORKSHEET

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

CDS Code

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Financing Education In Minnesota

Hampton Falls School Board Meeting September 1, W. Skoglund and S. Smylie.

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

State Parental Involvement Plan

Instructional Materials Survey For Compliance With Education Code Sections 1240 (i) And Elementary School Level

Rural Education in Oregon

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Wright Middle School. School Supplement to the District Policy Guide

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

46 Children s Defense Fund

Transcription:

---- --- - Placer Elementary School 8650 Horseshoe Bar Rd Loomis, CA 95650 (916) 652-1830 Grades K-8 Rick Judd, Principal rjudd@loomis-usd.k12.ca.us http://placer.loomis-usd.k12.ca.us/ 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card Published During the 2016-17 School Year District Profile: The Loomis Union School District is located in the Town of Loomis a quaint, family-oriented community. Established in 1850 and incorporated in 1984, Loomis retains its rural character and charm with its large residential lots and custom homes, an old-fashioned downtown, and woodlands with natural streams and rolling hillsides. Loomis is located about 25 miles northeast of Sacramento and is only ten minutes from Folsom Lake and a little over an hour away from either Lake Tahoe or the San Francisco Bay. ---- ---- Loomis Union Elementary School District 3290 Humphrey Rd. Loomis, CA 95650 (916) 652-1800 www.loomis-usd.k12.ca.us District Governing Board Jim Foster, Area 1: Citrus Colony Kurt Turner, Area 2: Loomis Jacob Hardey, Area 3: Rock Springs Mike Edwards, Area 4: Placer Ann Baker, Area 5: Franklin District Administration Gordon Medd Superintendent Jay Stewart Associate Superintendent - Business Services Jean Crouse Assistant Superintendent - Educational Services Loomis Union School District is comprised of six elementary schools and a charter school, serving students in transitional kindergarten through eighth grade. The staff at Placer Elementary is a very caring and highly committed staff that works well as a collaborative team. Placer Elementary School Mission Statement: Placer School is committed to collaborate with our families, community, staff, and students to work towards clearly focused educational, personal, and social goals. Together we will meet academic standards, promote the love of learning and inspire students to be responsible and caring community decision makers. The Miner Way!!! Be Responsible, Be Respectful, and always Be Ready to Learn! Placer School Profile and Principal s Message: Placer Elementary School has a rich and unique history. The school opened in 1894 outside the town of Loomis and nestled in the beautiful country of woodlands and rolling streams. Many of our children's parents are former Placer Elementary School students. Placer Elementary School has an enrollment of 530 students in grades Transitional-Kindergarten through eighth.the staff includes 19 classroom teachers, credentialed support staff, and instructional assistants (para-educators). The school continues to offer a warm and welcoming atmosphere, dedicated teachers, and a rich tapestry of cultures representative of our community. Placer School Home of the Miners is a wonderful place to teach and to learn. Placer School is committed to academic excellence. Together with our families and the community, the staff and students of Placer work toward clearly focused educational, personal, and social goals. Placer boasts strong parental involvement. Parents are involved in many functions such as; volunteering in the classroom, chairing a fundraiser, chairing or serving on a committee, and either plan or attend many school functions such as: Miner Welcome Back Night, Back-to-School Night, Open House, School Fundraisers, parent/teacher conferences. serving on committees such as the PBIS (Positive Behavioral, Intervention School), LBEF (Loomis Basin Educational Foundation), Technology, Art, Garden, attending to PTC meetings or being on the board are all important ways that parents learn about what s going on at school and continue to model the "Miner Way". Staff members are supportive of each other and are committed to providing a positive academic learning environment, emphasizing both basic and creative skills while recognizing individual learning styles. Students' learning styles and needs are taken into account when lessons are planned and instruction delivered. It is important to all of the teaching staff that each and every child is successful at school. Placer Elementary School is committed to working with the community and its students to promote a love of learning through respect, responsibility, commitment, work ethic and meeting academic standards while becoming responsible and caring decision makers to come. At Placer Elementary, everyone knows what it takes to enhance success: The Miner Way!!! Be Responsible, Be Respectful, and always Be Ready to Learn! Sincerely, Rick Judd, Principal 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Placer Elementary School Page 1 of 8

About the SARC By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. 2015-16 Student Enrollment by Grade Level Grade Level Number of Students Kindergarten 70 Grade 1 42 Grade 2 52 Grade 3 55 Grade 4 57 Grade 5 50 Grade 6 50 Grade 7 63 Grade 8 49 Total Enrollment 488 2015-16 Student Enrollment by Group Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American 0 American Indian or Alaska Native 2.5 Asian 1.4 Filipino 0.4 Hispanic or Latino 5.7 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 White 89.3 Two or More Races 0.6 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 13.5 English Learners 2.7 Students with Disabilities 10.2 Foster Youth 0 DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners). A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair. Teacher Credentials Placer Elementary School 14-15 15-16 16-17 With Full Credential 23 24 24 Without Full Credential 0 0 0 Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 0 0 1 Loomis Union Elementary School District 14-15 15-16 16-17 With Full Credential Without Full Credential Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions at this School Placer Elementary School 14-15 15-16 16-17 Teachers of English Learners 0 0 0 Total Teacher Misassignments 0 0 0 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 0 * Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers 2015-16 Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Location of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 100.0 0.0 Districtwide All Schools 100.0 0.0 High-Poverty Schools 0.0 0.0 Low-Poverty Schools 100.0 0.0 * High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, firstserved basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Placer Elementary School Page 2 of 8

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2016-17) The school district held a public hearing on August 11, 2016 and determined that each school within the district had sufficient and good quality textbooks, instructional materials, or science lab equipment pursuant to the settlement of Williams vs. the State of California. All students, including English learners, are given their own individual standards-aligned textbooks or instructional materials, or both, in core subjects for use in the classroom and to take home. Textbooks and supplementary materials are adopted according to a cycle developed by the California Department of Education, making the textbooks used in the school the most current available. Materials approved for use by the state are reviewed by all teachers and a recommendation is made to the School Board by a selection committee composed of teachers and administrators. All recommended materials are available for parent examination at the district office prior to adoption. The table displays information collected in September, 2016 about the quality, currency, and availability of the standards-aligned textbooks and other instructional materials used at the school. Core Curriculum Area Reading/Language Arts Houghton Mifflin - Adopted 2002 McDougal Littell - Adopted 2002 Textbooks and Instructional Materials Year and month in which data were collected: September, 2016 Textbooks and Instructional Materials/Year of Adoption The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Yes Percent of students lacking their own assigned textbook: 0 Mathematics Everyday Math - Adopted 2015 College Preparatory Mathematics (CPM) - Adopted 2014 The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Yes Percent of students lacking their own assigned textbook: 0 Science Delta Education: Foss - Adopted 2007 Glencoe - Adopted 2007 The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Yes Percent of students lacking their own assigned textbook: 0 History-Social Science Holt - Adopted 2006 Scott Foresman - Adopted 2006 The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Yes Percent of students lacking their own assigned textbook: 0 School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year) Placer Elementary originally opened its doors to students in 1894. The current campus was constructed in the late 1950 s and early 1960 s and is comprised of 19 classrooms, six portable classrooms, a library/media center, a gym/multipurpose room, a staff/work room, a computer lab, and various outdoor fields, play areas, and play equipment. Recent renovations to the school include the installation of solar panels, HVAC and energy efficient lighting in all classroom, carpeting and interior painting. School facilities are all up-to-date, clean, safe, and provide adequate space for students and staff. The table displays the results of the most recent school facilities inspection provided by the district. While reviewing this report, please note that even minor discrepancies are reported in the inspection process. The items noted in the table have been corrected or are in the process of remediation. System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: 3/14/2016 Repair Status Good Fair Poor Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Placer Elementary School Page 3 of 8

Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains System Inspected Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: 3/14/2016 Repair Status Good Fair Poor Overall Rating Exemplary Good Fair Poor ---------- Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for students in the general education population and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] and mathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. The CAAs have replaced the California Alternate Performance Assessment [CAPA] for ELA and mathematics, which were eliminated in 2015. Only eligible students may participate in the administration of the CAAs. CAA items are aligned with alternate achievement standards, which are linked with the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students with significant cognitive disabilities); and The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study Subject 2015-16 CAASPP Results for All Students Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards (grades 3-8 and 11) School District State 14-15 15-16 14-15 15-16 14-15 15-16 ELA 65 67 64 65 44 48 Math 60 63 57 57 34 36 * Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Subject CAASPP Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State 13-14 14-15 15-16 13-14 14-15 15-16 13-14 14-15 15-16 Science 88 81 84 83 78 75 60 56 54 * Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) in grades five, eight, and ten. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Grade Level 2015-16 Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards 4 of 6 5 of 6 6 of 6 ---5--- 19.6 29.4 23.5 ---7--- 18.5 21.5 35.4 * Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Placer Elementary School Page 4 of 8

Group 2015-16 CAASPP Results by Student Group Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) Number of Students Percent of Students Enrolled with Valid Scores w/ Valid Scores Proficient or Advanced All Students 105 99 94.3 83.8 Male 53 52 98.1 76.9 Female 52 47 90.4 91.5 White 98 93 94.9 83.9 Students with Disabilities 11 10 90.9 50.0 * Science test results include CSTs, CMA, and CAPA in grades five, eight, and ten. The Proficient or Advanced is calculated by taking the total number of students who scored at Proficient or Advanced on the science assessment divided by the total number of students with valid scores. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. All Students Male Female White Student Group Students with Disabilities School Year 2015-16 CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA) Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven Grade Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Percent of Students Standard Met or Exceeded 3 56 56 100.0 50.0 4 61 60 98.4 60.3 5 52 50 96.2 80.0 6 53 53 100.0 60.4 7 66 66 100.0 70.8 8 53 53 100.0 83.0 3 26 26 100.0 42.3 4 36 35 97.2 48.6 5 26 25 96.2 76.0 6 29 29 100.0 51.7 7 27 27 100.0 77.8 8 27 27 100.0 74.1 3 30 30 100.0 56.7 4 25 25 100.0 78.3 5 26 25 96.2 84.0 6 24 24 100.0 70.8 7 39 39 100.0 65.8 8 26 26 100.0 92.3 3 51 51 100.0 54.9 4 54 53 98.2 64.7 5 47 45 95.7 80.0 6 42 42 100.0 64.3 7 59 59 100.0 74.1 8 51 51 100.0 82.3 7 13 13 100.0 41.7 ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. The number of students tested includes all students who participated 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Placer Elementary School Page 5 of 8

in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. All Students Male Female White Student Group Students with Disabilities School Year 2015-16 CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven Grade Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Percent of Students Standard Met or Exceeded 3 56 56 100.0 66.1 4 61 59 96.7 57.6 5 52 50 96.2 82.0 6 53 53 100.0 39.6 7 66 65 98.5 60.0 8 66 65 98.5 60.0 3 26 26 100.0 73.1 4 36 35 97.2 54.3 5 26 25 96.2 84.0 6 29 29 100.0 31.0 7 27 27 100.0 59.3 8 27 27 100.0 59.3 3 30 30 100.0 60.0 4 25 24 96.0 62.5 5 26 25 96.2 80.0 6 24 24 100.0 50.0 7 39 38 97.4 60.5 8 39 38 97.4 60.5 3 51 51 100.0 70.6 4 54 52 96.3 57.7 5 47 45 95.7 82.2 6 42 42 100.0 45.2 7 59 58 98.3 60.3 8 59 58 98.3 60.3 7 13 12 92.3 25.0 8 13 12 92.3 25.0 Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Placer Elementary School Page 6 of 8

Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2016-17) Placer boasts strong parental involvement. Parents are involved in many functions such as; volunteering in the classroom, chairing a fundraiser, chairing or serving on a committee, and either plan or attend many school functions such as: Miner Welcome Back Night, Back-to-School Night, Open House, School Fundraisers, parent/teacher conferences. Serving on committees such as the PBIS (Positive Behavioral, Intervention School), LBEF (Loomis Basin Educational Foundation), Technology, Art, Garden, attending to PTC meetings or being on the board are all important ways that parents learn about what s going on at school and continue to model the "Miner Way". For more information on the PTC, please contact the school at 916-652-1830 or their web site placerptc.org. State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety. School Safety Plan The safety of students and staff is a primary concern at Placer Elementary. The school is always in compliance with all laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to hazardous materials and state earthquake standards. The School Safety plan was last reviewed and updated in Fall 2016 by the School Leadership Team and Site Council and reviewed with staff at the start of the school year. The school s disaster preparedness plan includes steps for ensuring student and staff safety during a disaster. Fire, Shelter-in-place, and disaster drills are conducted on a regular basis throughout the school year. The school added security cameras for student safety and asset protection. Students are supervised before and after school and during recess by staff. Noon Duty Supervisors monitor students during lunch recess. All visitors must sign in at the school office and sign out upon leaving. The designated drop off and pick up area for students is at the front of the school. Suspensions and Expulsions School 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Suspensions Rate 2.2 5.2 1.5 Expulsions Rate 0.0 0.0 0.0 District 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Suspensions Rate 2.3 2.5 2.1 Expulsions Rate 0.0 0.0 0.0 State 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Suspensions Rate 4.4 3.8 3.7 Expulsions Rate 0.1 0.1 0.1 D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Program Improvement Status 2016-17 Federal Intervention Program First Year of Program Improvement Year in Program Improvement Indicator School District Not In PI Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 1 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 33.3 Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff at this School Academic Counselor------- Number of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development).14 Library Media Teacher (Librarian).0128 Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional).5625 Psychologist-------.6 Social Worker------- Nurse-------.3 Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist.5 Resource Specialist------- Other------- Average Number of Students per Staff Member Academic Counselor------- * One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Placer Elementary School Page 7 of 8

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) Number of Classrooms* Average Class Size Grade 1-20 21-32 33+ 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 K 23 18 18 1 3 3 2 1 22 26 26 1 1 2 2 2 23 21 21 1 1 2 1 1 3 20 28 28 2 2 2 4 23 20 20 5 10 10 5 1 5 23 27 27 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 6 17 25 25 5 10 10 10 Average Class Size Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) Number of Classrooms* 1-22 23-32 33+ Subject 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 English------- 21 20 20 2 2 2 3 3 3 ---------- Mathematics 21 20 20 2 2 2 3 3 3 ---------- Science------- 21 20 20 2 2 2 3 3 3 ---------- Social Science 21 20 20 2 2 2 3 3 3 *---------- Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level. Professional Development provided for Teachers As part of the professional growth process, opportunities for training and staff development are provided at both the district and individual school sites to administrators, teachers, certificated and classified staff. The district offered three staff development days annually during the last three years where staff members are offered professional growth opportunities to expand staff knowledge in curriculum, assessment and instructional strategies. FY 2014-15 Teacher and Administrative Salaries Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $40,620 $44,507 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $61,040 $68,910 Highest Teacher Salary $84,995 $88,330 Average Principal Salary (ES) $101,200 $111,481 Average Principal Salary (MS) $115,435 Average Principal Salary (HS) $113,414 Superintendent Salary $164,252 $169,821 Percent of District Budget Teacher Salaries 40% 39% Administrative Salaries 6% 6% * For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Types of Services Funded Special Education, Music, Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) enrichment activities FY 2014-15 Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries Level Expenditures Per Pupil Total Restricted Unrestricted Average Teacher Salary School Site- $5976 $988 $4988 $63071 District------ $5980 $65,347 - State------- $5,677 $71,610 Percent Difference: School Site/District -16.6-1.0 Percent Difference: School Site/ State -6.7-8.7 * Cells with do not require data. 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Placer Elementary School Page 8 of 8