Chapter Three: Instruction and Instructional Programs AR 3120 Program and Curriculum Development and Planning

Similar documents
PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

State Budget Update February 2016

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Application for Fellowship Leave

Department of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

Santiago Canyon College 8045 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA AGENDA CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION COUNCIL Monday, October 30, :30pm B-104

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

New Graduate Program Proposal Review Process. Development of the Preliminary Proposal

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

OP-P 602 A-E Page 1 of 8. Operating Protocol-Procedure #: 602 (A-E) Category: Instruction Office of Primary Responsibility: Office of Academic Affairs

Program Change Proposal:

CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

El Camino College Planning Model

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED PRIOR TO JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Pennsylvania Association of Councils of Trustees THE ROLE OF TRUSTEE IN PENNSYLVANIA S STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

Anthropology Graduate Student Handbook (revised 5/15)

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

Faculty Voice Task Force 5: Fixed Term Faculty. November 1, 2006

Approved Academic Titles

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Introduction: SOCIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY

Circulation information for Community Patrons and TexShare borrowers

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

Santa Rosa Junior College

Proposing New CSU Degree Programs Bachelor s and Master s Levels. Offered through Self-Support and State-Support Modes

SCNS changed to MUM 2634

Kahului Elementary School

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Chapter 4 Grading and Academic Standards

8. Prerequisites, corequisites (If applicable) Prerequisites: ACCTG 1 (Financial Accounting) ACCTG 168 (Tax Accounting)

P A S A D E N A C I T Y C O L L E G E SHARED GOVERNANCE

ARTICLE XVII WORKLOAD

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Student Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment

General Education Review Committee Agenda

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Greek Life Code of Conduct For NPHC Organizations (This document is an addendum to the Student Code of Conduct)

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

College of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions

Hiring Procedures for Faculty. Table of Contents

BSW Student Performance Review Process

The application is available on the AAEA website at org. Click on "Constituent Groups", then AAFC and then AAFC Scholarship.

Librarian/Library Faculty Meeting

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

CERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

2362 Palmer Set up an appointment:

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

Subject: Regulation FPU Textbook Adoption and Affordability

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

RATIFIED BY: 1.00 POSITION TITLE: BRESCIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HEAD SOPH

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

BY-LAWS of the Air Academy High School NATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Undergraduate Degree Requirements Regulations

Adult Education ACCE Presentation. Neil Kelly February 2, 2017

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias

ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

Common Performance Task Data

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School

SPECIAL REPORT INTERNATIONAL STUDIES COUNCIL

Shall appoint and supervise the Staff Positions of the UP Shall write position descriptions for the members of the Staff of the UP

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Academic Freedom Intellectual Property Academic Integrity

State Parental Involvement Plan

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

Transcription:

AR 3120 I. Curriculum Committee The Curriculum Committee, a standing committee of the Faculty Senate, coordinates curriculum development and review. Voting members include: One faculty representative from each division (chair of a Division Committee on curriculum or their designee) One Articulation Officer One faculty Librarian One faculty Counselor One student The non voting member is the Vice President, Instruction. The Curriculum Chair is appointed by the Faculty Senate President. Curriculum Committee meetings: six times a year or as needed Agenda: The Curriculum Chair in consultation with the Vice President, Instruction and the Instructional Procedures Analyst will prepare the agendas. Minutes: The executive assistant for the Vice President, Instruction will take minutes. II. New Course Proposals and Changes to Existing Courses A. Proposals may be submitted to the Curriculum Committee in the fall or spring semesters for implementation in the following semester. B. Proposals are initiated by faculty members and require the endorsement of their Division Curriculum Committee. C. Before new course proposals and modifications are forwarded to the Curriculum Committee, they will first be reviewed by Administrative Review, which includes the Articulation Officer, the Director (or representative) of the Library and Learning Resources, the Instructional Deans, Student Learning Outcomes Coordinator, Distance Education Director, and the Chair of the Content Review Committee. Following the Administrative Review, the curriculum will be reviewed by the Chairperson of the Curriculum Committee, the Division Dean, and the Vice President, Instruction. The reviewers will consider: 1. Completeness and accuracy in filling out the form(s) 2. Accurate numbering and credit status 3. Accurate transferability information 4. Hour (lecture/laboratory) and unit consistency AR 3120 Page 1 of 5

5. Potential interdepartmental curricular conflicts 6. Prerequisite appropriateness 7. Hour (lecture/laboratory) and classroom activity consistency 8. Compliance with Title 5 requirements 9. Receiving of required reading material and text III. The originator will be asked to revise the proposal if information is incomplete, inappropriate, or inaccurate. D. Once all reviewers have reviewed the proposal, it will be placed on the Curriculum committee agenda for information and action. At the Curriculum Committee meeting, committee members may raise questions concerning course proposals. In the event that additional information is required, the originator or his/her representative may answer questions at a subsequent scheduled meeting. E. After originators have been given an opportunity to answer questions about proposals, the Curriculum Committee acts upon the proposal. F. Course proposals approved by the Curriculum Committee are forwarded to the Faculty Senate for review and approval. G. The Faculty Senate forwards its recommendation to the Vice President, Instruction. H. The Vice President, Instruction recommends to the Governing Board and directs changes in the College Catalog and Schedule of Classes. Curriculum records are maintained in the Instruction Office. New Programs of Instruction A. In an effort to insure an orderly and coordinated development of instructional programs that will service the needs of students and the community, attention will be given to the following considerations: 1. Clear demonstration of need 2. Consistency with overall college goals and objectives 3. Complete cost and income analysis 4. Appropriate location of program within division 5. Staffing implications 6. Adequacy of college support 7. Need for new facilities 8. Anticipated enrollment 9. Regional articulation B. After tentative endorsement by the division, the department and the Office of Instruction will jointly develop and conduct a thorough needs assessment to determine whether a clear demonstration of need exists. C. If the results of the needs assessment demonstrate a need for the program, a written proposal will be developed by the department and will provide necessary information listed in A above and all information required for State approval. AR 3120 Page 2 of 5

D. The new program proposal shall be approved by the division in which the program will be located and by the Division Dean. E. Proposals shall be submitted to the Curriculum Committee in the spring semester for implementation in the following year. They should be submitted on the appropriate form and by the deadline developed by the Curriculum Committee Chairperson and the Office of Instruction. F. Before new program proposals are forwarded to the Curriculum Committee, they will first be reviewed by Administrative Review, which includes the Articulation Officer and the Instructional Deans. Following the Administrative Review, the curriculum will be reviewed by the Chairperson of the Curriculum Committee, the Division Dean, and the Vice President, Instruction. The originator will be asked to revise the proposal if information is incomplete, inappropriate or inaccurate. Once all reviewers have reviewed the proposal, it will be placed on the Curriculum Committee agenda for introduction and action. At the first Curriculum Committee meeting, in a consecutive series of meetings, committee members may raise questions concerning the proposal. In the event that additional information is required, the originator or his/her representative may answer questions at a subsequent scheduled meeting. G. After originators have been given an opportunity to answer questions about proposals, they will be acted upon by a vote of the Curriculum Committee at a subsequent meeting. H. After approval by the Curriculum Committee, if the proposal is for a Career Technical Education program, it shall be presented for regional college review and endorsement. I. New program proposals approved by the Curriculum Committee are forwarded to the Faculty Senate for review and approval. J. The Faculty Senate forwards its recommendation to the Vice President, Instruction. K. After review by the Faculty Senate, the Vice President, Instruction recommends to the Superintendent/President who will recommend to the Governing Board. L. Following Governing Board approval and review of CTE programs by the Regional Consortium, the Office of Instruction will submit to the Chancellor s Office a request for approval of the program. IV. Instructional Planning A. Instructional Planning Process College programs will participate in the instructional planning process at least once every six years and more frequently when conditions warrant it. Discipline areas will be provided with information to assist them in planning. Data will include: weekly student contact hours, number of majors, retention rates, numbers of graduates, follow-up reports on graduates, employer information, and major AR 3120 Page 3 of 5

internal and external trends, for example: employment and population trends, part-time/full-time trends, and other demographics. The information will be supplemented by information gathered by the faculty through surveys of faculty and students, through curriculum review, and through study of the employment area and/or university curriculum. Based on this analysis, the discipline area will review and, if necessary, revise course outlines and requisites, and will develop an instructional plan that will be submitted to the Vice President, Instruction and the Council for Instructional Planning. This information will then become a part of budget and staffing proposals and the College Master Plan. B. Career Technical Program Needs Assessment 1. A needs assessment will be conducted for each Career Technical Education program at least every two years or when conditions warrant it. This review shall demonstrate that the program continues to meet a documented labor market demand, does not represent unnecessary duplication of other workforce development programs in the college s service area, and is of demonstrated effectiveness as measured by the employment and completion success of its students. The Career Education and Economic Development Office, in cooperation with the divisions, will establish the schedule for the assessments. 2. The Planning and Research Office will conduct the needs assessment in consultation with the Career Education and Economic Development Office. Assessment of the labor market demand may be conducted by a review of published and online labor market information available from a variety of sources or a direct survey of local and regional employers may be carried out by the institutional researchers with the assistance of the appropriate department(s) or division(s). 3. The results of the needs assessment will be shared with the department, the Program Chair, the Division Dean and the Dean for Career Education and Economic Development. 4. When the findings of the needs assessment indicate the need for follow-up action, the Division Dean, the Dean of Career Education and Economic Development, the Program Chair, and and members of the department will meet to discuss results and possible follow-up actions 5. When follow-up action is appropriate the Program Chair, Division Dean, and Dean of Career Education and Economic Development will meet to recommend actions to be taken, or further research to be done, as a result of the needs assessment. 6. The Program Chair will submit a written summary of the assessment, findings, and any recommended follow-up actions to the appropriate deans and Vice President, Instruction for review and approval. The Vice President, Instruction will forward these reports to the Governing Board for review and approval. C. Program Discontinuance AR 3120 Page 4 of 5

For this procedure see AR 3121 Council for Instructional Planning Purpose: The purpose of Instructional Planning is to recognize quality and assist in the continuous strengthening and improvement of the college academic program as well as the support services in the instruction component. The process is designed to provide a rigorous examination of programs and their outcomes, to develop new insights into program effectiveness, to suggest ways in which programs can become more responsive to student and community needs, and to provide information for resource allocation within departments and within the college. All programs and services will be reviewed every six years and programs will provide one-page annual updates to the Office of Instruction in the intervening years. The order in which programs will be reviewed is determined by the Council for Instructional Planning. CIP Membership: 1. Vice President, Instruction 2. (5) Division Deans 3. Dean of Instructional Development 4. Dean of Career Education and Economic Development 5. Dean of Education Centers 6. Director of Library (Administrator) 7. Dean of Student Services 8. President, Faculty Senate 9. Faculty Senate Representative 10. SLO Coordinator 11. Planning and Research Office Representative CIP Meetings: Monthly, or as needed. Agenda: The agenda is prepared by the Vice President, Instruction. Agenda items may be submitted in advance by committee members. Minutes: The executive assistant for the Vice President, Instruction will take minutes. Revised: May 3, 1999 Revised: June 13, 2011 AR 3120 Page 5 of 5