Student Voting Rates for

Similar documents
12-month Enrollment

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Raw Data Files Instructions

University of Arizona

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey


File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Best Colleges Main Survey

Shelters Elementary School

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Transportation Equity Analysis

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Cooper Upper Elementary School

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

Educational Attainment

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Bellevue University Admission Application

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

A Guide to Supporting Safe and Inclusive Campus Climates

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Campus Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

James Madison University Civic Action Plan

Data Diskette & CD ROM

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

February 1, Dear Members of the Brown Community,

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

Organization Profile

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Please complete these two forms, sign them, and return them to us in the enclosed pre paid envelope.

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

2018 Great Ideas Conference SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM

The Unequal Distribution of Economic Education: A Report on the Race, Ethnicity, and Gender of Economics Majors at US Colleges and Universities

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

LIM College New York, NY

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

46 Children s Defense Fund

Millersville University Degree Works Training User Guide

John F. Kennedy Middle School

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Legislative Counsel Bureau and Nevada Legislature 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV Equal Opportunity Employer

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Peru State College Peru, NE

Fruitvale Station Shopping Center > Retail

User Manual. Understanding ASQ and ASQ PLUS /ASQ PLUS Express and Planning Your Study

ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE. INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE (Excellence and Accountability)

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Little Rock, AR


Swarthmore College Common Data Set

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Research Brief. Literacy across the High School Curriculum

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Harrassment: offensive, hostile, or intimidating conduct that interfered unreasonably with their ability to work or learn on campus.

Consumer Information Boot Camp

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

Graduate Diploma in Sustainability and Climate Policy

Rural Education in Oregon

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

New Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

Azusa Pacific University Azusa, CA

Hawai i Pacific University Sees Stellar Response Rates for Course Evaluations

Supplemental Focus Guide

Transcription:

WHAT'S INSIDE About This Report Your Students' Voting Rates CAMPUS REPORT Student Voting Rates for 002155.00 Rate Breakdown By Age Group By Education Level By Gender By Race/Ethnicity By Field of Study By Voting Method How Your Institution's Numbers Compare

About This Report Thank you for participating in the National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement (NSLVE), housed at the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service, Tufts University. Since NSLVE s launch in 2013, more than 750 colleges and universities have signed up to receive their voting rates for the and elections. Participating colleges and universities are located in 48 states and represent all Carnegie classifications as well as socially and economically diverse students. With others, your institution s participation in this study has allowed us to build a robust database of over 6.7 million college student records that is already serving as a foundation for innovative research on college student political learning and engagement in democracy. Looking Ahead In response to our survey, many of you requested resources as well as stories about what other campuses are doing. Over the coming months, NSLVE will be releasing tools and resources that you and others can use to enhance political learning and engagement in democracy on your campus. Here is a sneak peek into some of this work. q Campus Discussion Guide: A tool for conversations on your campus regarding how to use the NSLVE report to spark change. q National Data: We ll be sharing data about the national landscape for college student voting. q Comparison Data: We know campuses are interested in learning more about how their voting compares to other similar institutions. We ll be rolling out aggregate comparison data for groups of participating campuses. q Case Studies: We ve been on the road, visiting campuses with unpredicted, high voting rates. We will be sharing the findings from our studies of campus climates for student political learning and engagement in democracy. q Diversity & Democracy: In November, in partnership with the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU) we will publish a special issue on college student political learning If you or someone else on your campus would like to receive more information about our research and resources, please join our mailing list. About the Data The voter registration and voting rates in this report reflect the percentage of your institution's students who were eligible to vote and who actually voted in the and elections. These results are based on enrollment records your institution submitted to the National Student Clearinghouse ( Clearinghouse ) and publicly available voting records collected by Catalist. Using enrollment records submitted on a date closest to the election, we removed students under 18 on Election Day. We also deducted an estimated number of students identified by your institution as non-resident aliens. This is based on the percentage of non-resident aliens reported by your institution to the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), and is more reliable than the demographic data campuses provide to the Clearinghouse at this time. Please note that students who blocked the use of their information under FERPA were also removed from the enrollment lists by the Clearinghouse. When combining two datasets, matching errors can occur. That said, for each record, we receive a confidence score. The average confidence score for the student records in our database is 96.6%. Nonetheless, some errors are still possible: On page three, we indicate the number of students who blocked their records from being used for any purpose, including research. If those students voted at a much lower or higher rate than your other students, it might affect the voting rate. Students not found in the voting database are considered non-voters, but we have no way to remove individual noncitizens (resident aliens and non-resident aliens). We use an estimate based on IPEDS data to account for your international students. We cannot adjust for undocumented students. This may result in your actual voting rate being higher than we report. To recalculate that percentage, see our FAQ on campus reports. Reviewing the Data Please use the following key to interpret the charts below: * = number of students is less than 10 - = zero results in this field For some colleges and universities, this report will contain some categories for which data is unknown. These likely reflect the amount or quality of the data the institution provides, a problem that can be corrected by more comprehensive reporting to the Clearinghouse. ACTIVECITIZEN.TUFTS.EDU/NSLVE 2 10

Your Students Voting and Registration Rates Voting Rate Voting Rate 49% 24% 73.6% 65.9% 48.5% Registration Rate Rate of Registered Students who Voted Voting Rate 63.9% 37.0% 23.6% Registration Rate Rate of Registered Students who Voted Voting Rate Total student enrollment 25,896 Total student enrollment 26,806 Ineligible to vote because too young 272 Ineligible to vote because too young 261 IPEDS estimated non-resident aliens 5,294 IPEDS estimated non-resident aliens 5,610 FERPA records blocked 33 FERPA records blocked 55 Number of students who registered 14,940 Number of students who registered 13,338 Number of students who voted 9,843 Number of students who voted 4,936 ACTIVECITIZEN.TUFTS.EDU/NSLVE 3 10

Your Students Voting Rate Breakdown BY AGE GROUP Your students broken down by age at the time of the election. Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens. 42.7% 36.8% 31.6% 37.5% 53.4% 74.8% - 13.9% 14.4% 15.9% 22.9% 36.5% 57.6% - 18-21 22-24 25-29 30-39 40-49 50+ Unknown 18-21 22-24 25-29 30-39 40-49 50+ Unknown AGE GROUP ENROLLED VOTED AGE GROUP ENROLLED VOTED 18-21 6,211 2,649 18-21 6,395 889 22-24 4,703 1,729 22-24 4,689 674 25-29 8,309 2,622 25-29 8,606 1,365 30-39 4,426 1,660 30-39 4,682 1,070 40-49 1,263 675 40-49 1,339 489 50+ 679 508 50+ 779 449 Unknown - - Unknown - - ACTIVECITIZEN.TUFTS.EDU/NSLVE 4 10

Your Students Voting Rate Breakdown BY EDUCATION LEVEL Your students broken down by undergraduate and graduate students. Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens. 41.2% 29.9% 51.1% 14.3% 16.4% 29.5% Undergraduate Graduate Unknown Undergraduate Graduate Unknown EDUCATION LEVEL ENROLLED VOTED EDUCATION LEVEL ENROLLED VOTED Undergraduate 6,552 2,699 Undergraduate 7,279 1,043 Graduate 12,173 3,635 Graduate 13,484 2,206 Unknown 6,866 3,509 Unknown 5,727 1,687 ACTIVECITIZEN.TUFTS.EDU/NSLVE 5 10

Your Students Voting Rate Breakdown BY GENDER Your students broken down by gender. Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens. 36.2% 31.5% 51.1% 19.0% 18.3% - Women Men Unknown Women Men Unknown GENDER ENROLLED VOTED GENDER ENROLLED VOTED Women 9,540 3,325 Women 12,885 2,445 Men 9,540 3,009 Men 13,605 2,491 Unknown 6,862 3,509 Unknown - - ACTIVECITIZEN.TUFTS.EDU/NSLVE 6 10

NSLVE CAMPUS REPORT Your Students Voting Rate Breakdown BY RACE/ETHNICITY Your students broken down by race/ethnicity. Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens. 27.5% 50.0% 42.0% 34.7% - 45.5% - 35.3% 7.9% 13.3% 11.1% 11.4% - 22.6% - 19.8% Asian Hispanic Black American Indian / Native Alaskan White Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander 2 or More Races Unknown Asian Hispanic Black American Indian / Native Alaskan White Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander Unknown 2 or More Races RACE/ETHNICITY ENROLLED VOTED RACE/ETHNICITY ENROLLED VOTED Asian 2,894 796 Asian 2,844 225 American Indian/ Native Alaskan 28 14 American Indian/ Native Alaskan 30 * Black 1,042 438 Black 1,027 114 Hispanic 565 196 Hispanic 402 46 Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander - - Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander - - White 8,439 3,839 White 8,198 1,850 2 or More Races - - 2 or More Races - - Unknown 11,203 3,957 Unknown 12,220 2,414 ACTIVECITIZEN.TUFTS.EDU/NSLVE 7 10

Your Students' Voting Rate Breakdown BY FIELD OF STUDY Your students broken down by field of study. Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens. Agriculture, Agriculture Operations, and Related Sciences Enrolled Voted Turnout Enrolled Voted Turnout - - - - - - Biological and Biomedical Sciences - - - 2,075 308 14.8% Business, Management, Marketing, and Related Support Communication, Journalism, and Related Programs Computer and Information and Library Sciences - - - 2,294 228 9.9% - - - 33 12 36.4% - - - 646 127 19.7% Education - - - 884 197 22.3% Engineering - - - 579 71 12.3% Health Professions and Related Sciences, Knowledge, and Skills - - - 1,059 148 14.0% Humanities - - - 1,386 243 17.5% Liberal Arts and Sciences, General Studie,s and Humanities - - - 1,952 286 14.7% Mathematics and Statistics - - - 678 58 8.6% Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies - - - 602 114 18.9% Parks and Recreation - - - - - - Physical Sciences - - - 1,007 179 17.8% Professions - - - 4,407 749 17.0% Psychology, Personal Awareness, and Self-Improvement - - - 475 77 16.2% Social Sciences - - - 2,277 406 17.8% Technologies/Technicians - - - - - - Trades - - - 32 * 6.3% Visual and Performing Arts - - - 329 28 8.5% ACTIVECITIZEN.TUFTS.EDU/NSLVE 8 10

Your Students' Voting Rate Breakdown BY VOTING METHOD Your students broken down by voting method. Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens. If your campus has a high percentage of "unknown" voting methods, it means that this information is not reported by local officals. 23.2% 1.5% 3.9% 5.4% 66.0% 12.2% 2.1% 7.0% 10.2% 68.6% Absentee Early Vote Mail In-Person, Election Day Unknown Absentee Early Vote Mail In-Person, Election Day Unknown VOTING METHOD ENROLLED VOTED VOTING METHOD ENROLLED VOTED Absentee 25,896 2,282 Absentee 26,806 600 Early Vote 25,896 146 Early Vote 26,806 102 Mail 25,896 381 Mail 26,806 346 In-person, Election Day 25,896 533 In-person, Election Day 26,806 503 Unknown 25,896 6,501 Unknown 26,806 3,385 ACTIVECITIZEN.TUFTS.EDU/NSLVE 9 10

How Your Numbers Compare BY CARNEGIE CLASSIFICATION See how your campus voting rate compares to others in your Carnegie classification. This comparison data allows your campus to understand your individual voting rates in the context of similar institutions. Please note that we are not able to adjust these voting rates by removing non-resident aliens. 48.5% 46.9% 47.8% 48.2% 47.1% 23.6% 18.8% 18.9% 19.2% 18.4% Your Institution All Public Private Your Institution All Public Private ACTIVECITIZEN.TUFTS.EDU/NSLVE 10 10