Selected Results from the 2008 Survey of Doctorate Recipients

Similar documents
Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

12-month Enrollment

Best Colleges Main Survey

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Shelters Elementary School

University of Arizona

Report on Academic Recruitment, Hiring, and Attrition

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

2018 Great Ideas Conference SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Cooper Upper Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for


California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

New Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Biomedical Sciences. Career Awards for Medical Scientists. Collaborative Research Travel Grants

Please complete these two forms, sign them, and return them to us in the enclosed pre paid envelope.

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Doctoral Initiative on Minority Attrition and Completion

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Survey of Formal Education

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

Culture, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics: Research Papers

Educational Attainment

Raw Data Files Instructions

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Cooper Upper Elementary School

LIM College New York, NY

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

EARNING. THE ACCT 2016 INVITATIONAL SYMPOSIUM: GETTING IN THE FAST LANE Ensuring Economic Security and Meeting the Workforce Needs of the Nation

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Report survey post-doctoral researchers at NTNU

Why Graduate School? Deborah M. Figart, Ph.D., Dean, School of Graduate and Continuing Studies. The Degree You Need to Achieve TM

PUBLIC NOTICE Nº 004/2016 POSTDOCTORAL SCHOLARSHIP POSTGRADUATE PROGRAM IN HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCES

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

SCHOOL. Wake Forest '93. Count

Bellevue University Admission Application

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey Data Collection Webinar

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Legislative Counsel Bureau and Nevada Legislature 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV Equal Opportunity Employer

46 Children s Defense Fund

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE EAST-WEST CENTER DEGREE FELLOWSHIP APPLICATION FORM

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

INCOMING [PEGASUS]² MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE FELLOWSHIPS 1

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Table of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

Legacy of NAACP Salary equalization suits.

Kahului Elementary School

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Application for Admission

NATIVE VILLAGE OF BARROW WORKFORCE DEVLEOPMENT DEPARTMENT HIGHER EDUCATION AND ADULT VOCATIONAL TRAINING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

Academic Teaching Staff (ATS) Agreement Implementation Information Document May 25, 2017

Upward Bound Program

Transcription:

Selected Results from the 2008 Survey of Doctorate Recipients Lynn Milan Council of Graduate Schools Graduate Education Research and Policy Forum September 14, 2011 National Science Foundation National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES) www.nsf.gov/statistics

Presentation Outline NCSES background Human Resources Statistics (HRS) program overview Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR) background 2008 SDR results Access to SDR data International Survey of Doctorate Recipients (ISDR) 9/23/2011 1

NCSES: Formerly the Division of Science Resources Statistics NCSES is responsible for statistical data on the following: The science and engineering workforce Research and development (R&D) U.S. competitiveness in science, engineering, technology, and R&D The condition and progress of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education in the United States 2

HRS Postsecondary Education & Workforce Data Survey of Institutions: Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering (GSS) Surveys of Individuals Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED) Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR) National Survey of Recent College Graduates (NSRCG) National Survey of College Graduates (NSCG) Statistical Data System: Scientists and Engineers Statistical Data System (SESTAT) - combines SDR, NSCG, and NSRCG Project: Early Career Doctorates Project (ECD) 3

Biennial longitudinal survey of individuals who earned research doctorates in science, engineering, or health (SEH) fields from U.S. academic institutions Conducted since 1973 SDR Background Federal agency support from National Institutes of Health Current data collection modes Web (55%) Mail (33%) Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews (CATI) (12%) 4

Target population consisted of all individuals meeting the following criteria: earned a research doctorate in an SEH field from a U.S. academic institution less than 76 years of age not institutionalized SDR Target Population living in the U.S. during the survey reference week of October 1, 2008 5

SDR Sample SDR sample is drawn from the Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED) respondents Sample members may be followed throughout their careers until age 76 Random sample is cut each cycle to add newly awarded doctorates while holding constant the sample size 2008 SDR Sample Size: 40,093 including 3,449 newly awarded doctorates from the 2006 and 2007 SED Target population size = 751,960 6

2008 SDR Response Rate Weighted response rate = 80.5% 29,974 completed surveys from eligible respondents 7

Recurring SDR Survey Questions Demographics Recent training, education Employment during reference date Employer type; change since last survey Occupation; change since last survey Faculty rank, tenure status Postdoc status, reasons for holding postdoc Work activities, including primary/secondary Relation between job and degree Salary and earned income Overall job satisfaction 8

SDR Special Topic Module Work-Related Experiences (2008) Number of papers, articles, & books authored Number of patents, patent applications, and commercialized products/processes on which named as an inventor Second job 9

Doctoral scientists and engineers, by U.S. citizenship status: 2008 US Citizenship Status 2001 2003 2006 2008 Count Count Count Count Percent All doctorate recipients 656,500 685,300 711,800 752,000 100.0% US citizens 597,300 622,600 644,000 675,200 89.8% Permanent residents 42,100 42,400 43,000 49,800 6.6% Temporary residents 17,200 20,200 24,800 26,900 3.6% Notes: Numbers are rounded to nearest 100. Detail may not add to total because of rounding. SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. 10

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Race/ethnicity of doctoral scientists and engineers, by broad field of doctorate: 2008 Science Engineering Health Other race* White Hispanic/Latino Black/African American Asian American Indian/ Alaska Native *Includes Native Hawaiians/Other Pacific Islanders and non-hispanic respondents reporting 2 or more races. SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. 11

Percent 100 90 80 Single- and multiple-race identification within each racial group among U.S. citizens and permanent residents who have self-identified as not Hispanic/Latino: 2008 500 2,500 800 600 600 600 7,300 0 Single race 70 60 50 3,600 107,600 20,600 200 565,600 Single race in combination with white 40 30 20 10 1,500 700 Other combinations of 2 or more races 0 American Indian/Alaska Native Asian Black/African American Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander NOTE: Numbers are rounded to nearest 100. SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. White 12

Employment status of doctoral scientists and engineers: 2008 2% 1% 10% 10% Employed full time Employed part time Unemployed Retired 77% Not employed/not seeking work SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. 13

Employment status of doctoral scientists and engineers, by sex: 2008 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Males SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. Females Not employed/not seeking work Retired Unemployed Employed part time Employed full time 14

Employment sector of employed doctoral scientists and engineers: 2008 7% 7% 3% 33% 6% 0% 41% 4-year educational institution Other educational institution Private for-profit Private nonprofit Federal government State/local government Self-employed 3% Other SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. 15

Employed doctoral scientists and engineers in 4-year educational institutions, by sex and faculty rank: 2008 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Males Females *No ranks designated at this institution or no ranks designated for this position. SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. Rank not applicable* All other faculty Instructor/lecturer Assistant professor Associate professor Full professor 16

Doctoral scientists and engineers on postdoctoral appointments, by citizenship status: 2006 & 2008 U.S. Citizenship Status 2006 2008 Count Percent Count Percent Total on postdoc 29,890 100.0% 27,300 100.0% U.S. citizen 18,260 61.1% 16,700 61.2% Non-U.S. citizen 11,630 38.9% 10,500 38.5% NOTES: Numbers are rounded to nearest 10 in 2006 and nearest 100 in 2008. Detail may not add to total because of rounding. SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. 17

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Postdoc status of doctoral scientists and engineers, by years since doctorate and broad field of doctorate: 2008 All fields Science Engineering Health SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. Years since doctorate 5 years 6 10 years 11 15 years >15 years 18

Doctoral scientists and engineers employed in postdocs, by field of doctorate: 2008 Field Count Percent Total in postdoc 27,300 100.0% Science 23,600 86.4% Biological/agricultural/environmental life sciences 14,900 54.6% Computer/information sciences 300 1.1% Mathematics/statistics 600 2.2% Physical sciences 5,100 18.7% Psychology 2,200 8.1% Social sciences 500 1.8% Engineering 3,000 11.0% Health 700 2.6% NOTES: Numbers are rounded to nearest 100. Detail may not add to total because of rounding. SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. 19

Doctoral scientists and engineers on postdoctoral appointments, by employment sector: 2006 & 2008 Employment sector 2006 2008 Count Percent Count Percent All sectors 29,890 100.0% 27,300 100.0% Educational institutions 23,600 79.0% 18,200 66.7% Business/industry 3,780 12.6% 5,600 20.5% Government 2,500 8.4% 3,500 12.8% NOTES: Numbers are rounded to nearest 10 in 2006 and nearest 100 in 2008. Detail may not add to total because of rounding. SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. 20

Median annual salaries of full-time doctoral scientists and engineers (in dollars), by field of doctorate and sex: 2008 Field All full-time employed Males Females All fields 98,000 101,000 82,000 Science 92,000 100,000 80,000 Biological/agricultural/ environmental life sciences 91,000 98,000 80,000 Computer/information sciences 107,000 109,000 98,000 Mathematics/statistics 95,000 97,000 83,000 Physical sciences 100,000 103,000 87,000 Psychology 84,000 94,000 77,000 Social sciences 88,000 93,000 79,000 Engineering 110,000 114,000 97,000 Health 90,000 100,000 84,000 NOTE: Median annual salaries are for principal job and are rounded to nearest $1,000. SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. 21

Median annual salaries of full-time doctoral scientists and engineers (in dollars), by field of doctorate and years since doctorate: 2008 $160,000 $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 Biological/agricultural/ environmental life sciences Computer/information sciences Mathematics/statistics Physical sciences Psychology Social sciences Engineering Health $40,000 5 6 10 11 15 16 20 21 25 >25 Years 22 SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008.

Median annual salaries of full-time doctoral scientists and engineers (in dollars), by broad field of doctorate and employment sector: 2008 Field All full-time employed 4-year educational institution Private for-profit Private non-profit Federal gov t Selfemployed All fields 98,000 80,000 117,000 100,000 107,000 99,000 Science 92,000 80,000 115,000 95,000 105,000 93,000 Engineering 110,000 100,000 119,000 120,000 117,000 116,000 Health 90,000 82,000 119,000 101,000 104,000 95,000 NOTE: Median annual salaries are for principal job and are rounded to nearest $1,000. SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. 23

Employed doctoral scientists and engineers engaged in patent-related activities, by broad field of doctorate and employment sector: 2008 Field 4-year educational institution Other educational institution Private nonprofit Federal gov t State/ local gov t Private forprofit Selfemployed All fields 23.9% 0.5% 63.7% 4.0% 4.6% 0.7% 2.8% Science 26.2% 0.8% 59.0% 5.2% 5.4% 0.9% 2.3% Engineering 19.3% D 71.6% 1.8% 3.4% D 3.6% Health 37.5% D 62.5% D D D D D = suppressed for confidentiality. SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. 24

Employed doctoral scientists and engineers engaged in publicationrelated activities, by broad field of doctorate and employment sector: 2008 Field 4-year educ. institution Other educ. institution Private nonprofit Federal gov t State/ local gov t Private forprofit Selfemployed Other All fields 51.1% 2.1% 27.0% 6.6% 7.3% 2.2% 3.5% 0.2% Science 54.3% 2.5% 22.5% 7.1% 7.4% 2.3% 3.7% 0.3% Engineering 33.6% 0.5% 50.3% 3.5% 7.0% 1.7% 3.1% D Health 60.7% 2.1% 16.5% 9.5% 6.2% 2.9% 1.7% D D = suppressed for confidentiality. SOURCE: Survey of Doctorate Recipients, 2008. 25

Access to SDR Data InfoBriefs - highlight results from recent surveys or analyses Detailed Statistical Tables (DSTs) - standard tabulations (electronic only) Online database: SESTAT Data Tool table generator Downloadable public use data files Restricted use data files with a license 26

SDR Info on the Web Survey Overview http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvydoctoratework/ Questionnaires http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/question.cfm#5 Publications (including Detailed Statistical Tables) http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/doctoratework/ SESTAT Data Tool and Public Use Files http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/sestat/ Restricted-Use Data License http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/database.cfm#microdata 27

NCSES Secure Data Access Facility (SDAF) A virtual data access facility is being built to provide secure access to confidential microdata from NCSES surveys for statistical analysis Initially will include Doctorate Records File (1958-2009) and NSRCG, SDR, and SESTAT (1993-2008) Research work can be saved in the virtual data center; multiple members of a research team can share work; anything shared publicly must undergo disclosure review Similar licensing process as with restricted-use data Access provided with a secure, thin-client terminal Available by December 2011 28

Limitations of 20 th -Century SDR Undercoverage of non-u.s. citizens who reported definite plans to leave U.S. after doctorate award so were not sampled, but ended up staying in U.S., or reported definite plans to stay in U.S. but subsequently lived in foreign country for 2 consecutive survey cycles and were dropped from SDR sample Doctorate-holders in SDR sample who were residing in a foreign country on the survey reference date were not surveyed 29

National/International SDR (NSDR/ISDR) 2003 SDR tested the feasibility of obtaining surveys from sample members who were living abroad ISDR currently has two components Sampled non-u.s. citizens from 2001 or later cohorts who reported plans to emigrate Non-U.S. citizen NSDR panel members found outside U.S. for 2 consecutive cycles Combining the two ISDR components with the traditional NSDR yields an integrated data set with virtually complete coverage of U.S.-earned SEH doctorates awarded in 2001 or later 30

Current Status of ISDR Extensive statistical work to determine the best methods of integrating the NSDR and ISDR samples 2010 ISDR sample = 5,712 Analysis potential ISDR sample becoming large enough to enable analysis of aggregated categories of respondents (by field of study, employment sector, occupations, demographics) Can examine international mobility ISDR data are not yet available 31

For further information on the SDR, contact Lynn Milan, Ph.D. SDR Project Officer Email: lmilan@nsf.gov 32