Dr. Diane M. DeBacker Interim Commissioner of Education

Similar documents
Shelters Elementary School

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

How Might the Common Core Standards Impact Education in the Future?

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Financing Education In Minnesota

Cooper Upper Elementary School

In 2010, the Teach Plus-Indianapolis Teaching Policy Fellows, a cohort of early career educators teaching

World s Best Workforce Plan

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Cooper Upper Elementary School

TEAM Evaluation Model Overview

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

Evaluating Progress NGA Center for Best Practices STEM Summit

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Ensure Economic Success for Tomorrow: Graduate All Students Today. Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery Final Report

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

46 Children s Defense Fund

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Denver Public Schools

State Budget Update February 2016

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

No Child Left Behind Bill Signing Address. delivered 8 January 2002, Hamilton, Ohio

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School

Wisconsin Youth Apprenticeship. Historical Overview

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Hokulani Elementary School

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

A Profile of Top Performers on the Uniform CPA Exam

Ferry Lane Primary School

MINUTES. Kentucky Community and Technical College System Board of Regents. Workshop September 15, 2016

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

African American Male Achievement Update

Common Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success

Cuero Independent School District

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan

A Diverse Student Body

Race to the Top (RttT) Monthly Report for US Department of Education (USED) NC RttT February 2014

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Teacher Preparation at Fort Hays State University: Traditional and Innovative

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Kahului Elementary School

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

For Your Future. For Our Future. ULS Strategic Framework

Arkansas Private Option Medicaid expansion is putting state taxpayers on the hook for millions in cost overruns

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Average Daily Membership Proposed Change to Chapter 8 Rules and Regulations for the Wyoming School Foundation Program

KDE Comprehensive School. Improvement Plan. Harlan High School

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

ESTABLISHING A TRAINING ACADEMY. Betsy Redfern MWH Americas, Inc. 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 200 Broomfield, CO

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Indiana Last Updated: October 2011

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Trends & Issues Report


Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Lied Scottsbluff Public Library Strategic Plan

Foundations of Bilingual Education. By Carlos J. Ovando and Mary Carol Combs

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

Rural Education in Oregon

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Transcription:

Dr. Diane M. DeBacker Interim Commissioner of Education 1

Student achievement in Kansas State Assessments in math and reading continues to increase for the 9 th year in a row despite the targets also increasing Student achievement on national assessments continues to place Kansas among the top P20 Race To The Top NGA Policy Academy 2

Kansas Assessments in math, reading, science and writing NAEP results ACT and SAT 3

263,508 Reading (Grades 3-8, HS) 265,768 Math (Grades 3-8, HS) 90,731 Science (Grades 4, 7, HS) 105,838 Writing (Grades 5, 8, HS every other year*) 4

All students Males & females Ethnic groups Free & reduced lunch Students with disabilities English Language Learners 5

Performance levels for Kansas: Exemplary Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Below Standard Academic Warning 6

94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 50 40 30 28.1 31.3 31.3 31.6 Free & Reduced 32.5 32.3 32.2 33.3 34.2 36 37.5 38.6 38.9 39 39.8 20 10 0 7 SPED 8.4 9.1 9.6 10.1 10.7 11 11.9 12.1 12.8 13.3 13.6 13.8 13.2 13 7.2 7.9 4 5.2 5.5 5.6 ELL Free & Reduced SPED ELL 7

90 80 70 60 50 50.3 54.5 56.2 59.8 65.3 68.1 72.5 80.1 81.0 82.8 40 30 20 10 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 8

Performance Criteria: Mathematics AYP Starting Point: Mathematics 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 46.8 46.8 29.1 29.1 53.5 38.0 60.1 60.1 46.8 46.8 K-8 math 9-12 math 82.3 77.8 73.4 66.8 76.4 70.5 64.6 55.7 86.7 82.3 91.1 88.2 95.6 100.0 94.1 100.0 10 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1/19/2010 9

Participation Rates 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 99.9% 99.4% 99.7% 99.8% 99.8% 10

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 High School 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 87.8 86.2 86.1 86.6 86.586.7 81.8 82.8 77.9 79.8 77.2 78.2 74.0 75.0 2008 2009 11

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 71 73.6 65.4 68 66.8 68.4 60.2 63.1 68.7 71 2008 2009 12

40 24.5 35.5 19.4 23.4 26.6 26.8 20 0 11.6 13.5 8 9 2008 2009 13

90 80 70 60 59.2 60.2 62.1 66.8 70.2 73.1 78 82.5 84.1 85.7 50 40 30 20 10 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 14

Performance Criteria: Reading AYP Starting Point: Reading 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 51.2 51.2 44.0 44.0 57.3 51.0 63.4 63.4 58.0 58.0 K-8 reading 9-12 reading 83.7 79.7 75.6 69.5 72.0 76.7 81.3 65.0 87.8 86.0 91.9 90.7 95.9 100.0 95.3 100.0 20 10 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1/19/2010 15

Participation Rates 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 99.8% 99.4% 99.7% 99.8% 99.7% 16

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 High School 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 85.1 83.6 86.4 87.2 86.4 87.7 83.8 84.4 85.1 85.8 84.6 84.3 82.4 81.4 2008 2009 17

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 74.1 76.6 70.6 73.4 69.1 68.5 71.3 62.4 64.6 66.6 2008 2009 18

40.0 30.0 20.0 0.0 31.0 29.0 28.2 25.7 24.2 8.6 10.1 5.1 6.6 2008 2009 19

Participation Rates 2008 2009 99.9% 99.95% 20

94 92 90 88 86 84 82 80 78 90.9 91.7 83 83 83 83.4 Grade 4 Grade 7 High School 2008 2009 21

100 80 60 75 76.7 71.6 71.2 63.5 64.5 63 64.5 69.2 70 40 20 0 Free & Reduced SPED ELL African-Am Hispanics 2008 2009 22

Participation Rates 2009 98.3% 23

Percentage of student achievement in the top three performance levels 5 th 70.6 8 th 73.5 High School 71.7 24

To be highly qualified, a teacher must be fully licensed & must demonstrate subject matter competence Competence demonstrated by: Content major, or PRAXIS II content test, or Rubric (content hours, content workshops, experience & other PD related to content area) 25

Percentage of core classes taught by highly qualified teachers 2008 2009 Elementary Schools 96% 97.5% Secondary Schools (middle, junior high and high schools) 90% 92.7% 26

100 98 96 96 97.5 94 92 90 88 86 90 92.7 Elementary Secondary 2008 2009 27

Graduation Rate High school requirement 75% or improvement over last year Attendance Rate Elementary school requirement 90% or improvement over last year 28

95 90 85 80 75 70 65 89.289.5 80.6 82.3 83.3 83.7 81.1 79.4 79.6 80.9 75.3 76.9 2008 2009 29

95.5 95 94.5 94 93.5 93 92.5 94.7 95 93.9 94 93.6 93.7 95.1 94.6 93.9 93.7 94.4 93.9 2008 2009 30

300 250 200 150 100 269 261 50 0 27 34 Made AYP Didn't Make AYP 2008 2009 31

1400 1200 1000 800 600 1205 1217 400 200 0 144 172 Made AYP Didn't Make AYP 2008 2009 32

1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 1,309 1,323 200 0 79 66 Accredited Accredited on Improvement 2008 2009 33

Given every other year Subject areas of math, reading and writing 2009 reading results will be released in Spring 2010 Given to grades 4 and 8 only Given to a sample population of these grades Results measured in a scale score of 0-500 Achievement levels of basic, proficient and advanced 34

2005 2007 2009 Nation 237 239 239 Kansas 246 248 246 35

2005 2007 2009 Nation 278 280 282 Kansas 284 290 289 36

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Nation 20.9 21.1 21.2 21.1 21.1 Kansas 21.7 21.8 21.9 22.0 21.9 74% of seniors (23,147 out of over 31,000) take the ACT ranking Kansas in the top 20% for participation 37

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Nation 520 518 515 515 515 Kansas 588 590 590 589 589 38

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Nation 508 503 502 502 501 Kansas 585 582 583 580 581 39

40

This competition will not be based on politics, ideology, or the preferences of a particular interest group. Instead, it will be based on a simple principle whether a state is ready to do what works Not every state will win and not every district will be happy with the results. But America s children, America s economy, and America itself will be better for it. President Barack Obama, July 24 41

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) totaled $787 billion February 2009 $100 billion in education aid RTTT = $4.35 billion

Adopting standards & assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workforce and to compete in the global economy; Building data systems that measure student growth and success, and inform teachers and principals about how they can improve instruction; Recruiting, developing, rewarding and retaining effective teachers and principals, especially where they are needed most; and Turning around our lowest-achieving schools. 43

A. State Success Factors (125 points 25%) B. Standards & Assessments (70 points 14%) C. Data Systems to Support Instruction (47 points-9%) D. Great Teachers & Leaders (138 points 28%) E. Turning Around Lowest-Achieving Schools (50 points 10%) F. General (55 points 11%) G. Competitive Preference Priority (STEM) (15 points 3%) 44

Kansas grant application requested $155 million 50% of the grant award must be distributed to participating districts based upon the Title I funding allocations 50% of the grant award remains with KSDE for the programs and projects of the grant and discretionary grants to districts # of participating districts 275 (94%) 45

P20 Education Council 46

KS Accomplishments: Align K-12 and Higher Education

Convened 10 times since July 2008 Formed & convened state leadership team for a gap analysis of K-12 and postsecondary education Contracted with Achieve, Inc. to assist with the gap analysis Surveyed high education institutions regarding entry level math & language arts readiness standards Strengthened relationship between KSDE & KBOR through coordination of efforts 48

Three early childhood recommendations to Governor Parkinson: Improve teacher & provider quality through coordination & collaboration at the state & local levels Promote coordination at the state & local levels to build a continuum of services & education from birth through grade three Coordinate data collection & analysis and use results to change practices by promoting evidencebased practices 49

Gap exists between Proficiency as defined at the K-12 level, and... College readiness as defined by higher education 50

National Governor s Association Policy Academy on Creating New Models of Teacher Compensation that Enhance Teacher Effectiveness 52

If you build it, they will come Kansas one of six states accepted into the academy (Florida, Indiana, Louisiana, Rhode Island, Tennessee) 18 months $25,000 Consult with national experts Convene state stakeholders Design a teacher pay initiative and action plan for implementation

Recruit new talent to the profession Retain existing talent within the profession Provide incentives for teachers to work in shortage areas & hard-to-staff schools Pay teachers for their contributions to improved teaching & learning

$286 million cut to education in the past year 2,100 licensed positions have been eliminated 1,600 classified positions have been eliminated 55

Cuts include: Before school programs After school programs Summer school Fine arts offerings All-day kindergarten Professional development Instructional days Delay of textbook purchases Delay of school bus purchases Increased pupil-teacher ratios Closure of buildings 56

A study released in January 2006 by Legislative Post Audit found,... a 1.0% increase in district performance outcomes was associated with a 0.83% increase in spending almost a one-to-one relationship. This means that, all things being equal, districts that spend more had better student performance. 57

What sits in our classrooms today is the future of tomorrow. Dollars spent on education today translate into investments and returns on our investments for our future. 58