SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

A Charter PUBLIC SCHOOL SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT 2015 2016 Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School 2665 Clarendon Ave., Huntington Park, CA 90255 1 (323) 800-2741 1 (323) 510-3690 fax prepatec.org

PTLAMS SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS Executive Director: Superintendent: Principal: School Address: Xavier Reyes Barry Baxter Raymond J. Schmidt 6005 Stafford Ave. (Grade 6) Huntington Park, CA 90255 1 (323) 800 2741 and / or 2665 Clarendon Ave. (Grades 7 8) Huntington Park, CA 90255 1 (323) 800 2741 and / or 2410 Broadway Ave. Walnut Park, CA 90255 1 (323) 923 0383 www.prepatec.org All school characteristics, including the Vision / Mission, student demographic information, description of the school community, teacher information, parental involvement opportunities, school facilities status, etc., are / will be contained in the School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The SARC is an appendix of the school plan. It can be accessed and viewed on- line at: http://www3.cde.ca.gov/sarcupdate/clink.aspx 1

Description and Demographic Narrative Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School is a charter school located in Huntington Park, California. The school completed its first year of operation in 2013 2014 and is fed by its relative IB PYP School, Academia Moderna Charter School. Entering the 2014 2015 school year, Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School had 5 full classes of Grade 6, 3 full classes of Grade 7, and 3 full classes of Grade 8 with a total of about 250 300 students. The 2015 2016 school year consists of 6 full classes of Grade 6, 5 full classes of Grade 7, and 4 full classes of Grade 8 with a total of about 400 420 students. The 2015 2016 school year will see the total of 6 full classes of Grades 6 8 with a total of about 480 500 students. The small school setting appeals to many families in our community. Parent participation in the classroom is always welcomed and encouraged. Parents have expressed a feeling of belonging at our school and feel that our school provides their children with a better education than traditional public schools. PTLAMS s vision is to create a center for higher learning in Southeast Los Angeles where students and families learn to exceed expectations, to be self-aware and aware of others, to be responsible, inquisitive, prepared, passionate, inspired, engaged, and independent. Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School applies the International Baccalaureate Middle Years Program tools and processes to be a school where partnerships for continuous improvement amongst students, teachers, parents, and the community are authentic and seek to prepare each student from Grade 6 8 for the challenges of the 21st century. PTLAMS is a model school of life-long learning through the International Baccalaureate Middle Years Program (IB MYP) in the United States. We create a dynamic environment where all staff cultivate, model, nurture, and promote our organizational values of real-world learning and application, servant leadership, inclusiveness, discovery, continuous improvement and accountability. Huntington Park is a city that is predominately Latino / Hispanic at 94% as compared to the California average of 37%, according to the 2013 Census. Other large ethnic or racial groups include Whites at 4.5% and Asians at approximately 1% with a smaller mix of other ethnic or racial groups. It is also a very young community with the largest demographic age group being 18 years old and under. This group comprises 32% of the total population as compared to the rest of California at 25%. Nearly half of our students' parents are classified as being in poverty and have very little educational attainment. The largest percentage of our parents at 36%, have a less than 9 th grade education, as compared to the California average of 11%. The school has a number of ties to the community including an evolving Parent Teacher Organization, a monthly Coffee With The Principal session, and regular community outreach events. The student body is reflective of the surrounding demographics, wherein over 98% of the population is Hispanic / Latino, with cultural ties with both Central and South America as well as Mexico. The majority of the student body is first generation immigrants with parents originally from Mexico and over 28% of our students are classified as English Language Learners. The staff is all United States Citizens with cultural ties to several areas that make up the Americas. The majority of staff members are bilingual in both American English and Spanish. 2

Statistical Demographic Information Reporting Ethnicity 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 # % # % # % African American 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% American Indian or Alaskan Native 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 1 1 / 252 =.39% Asian American 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% Filipino American 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 97 97 / 98 = 98.9% 249 249 / 252 = 98.8% Pacific Islander 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% White (Not Hispanic) 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 1 1 / 252 =.39% Other Ethnicity or Missing 1 1 / 98 = 1.02% 1 1 / 252 =.39% Other Demographics 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 # % # % # % English Learner (EL) 28 28 / 98 = 28.6% 45 45 / 252 = 17.9% Long Term English Learner (LTEL) 4 4 / 98 = 4.1% 1 1 / 252 =.39% RFEP 15 15 / 25 = 60% 20 20 / 46 = 44.4% Economically Disadvantaged 59 59 / 98 = 60.2% 231 231 / 252 = 91.7% Students with Disabilities (SWD) 8 8 / 98 = 8.2% 23 23 / 252 = 9.1% Migrant Education 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% Gifted and Talented Ed. (GATE) 0 0 / 0 = 0.0% 2 2 / 252 =.79% 3

PTLAMS School Vision and Mission Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School s mission is to provide a world-class education to every student through an inquiry and investigation school model that will prepare students to meet the challenges of a global 21 st century. We will fulfill our mission with: 1. High Academic Achievement 2. Standards-Based Instruction 3. Positive Student Character Development 4. Community Participation Our mission statement was written to align with the IB mission statement because our vision from the beginning was to become an International Baccalaureate school. The Middle Years Program plays a vital role in fulfilling the mission to bring a world-class education to our students. Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School is confident in its ability to apply the philosophies of the International Baccalaureate Organization into our standards based curriculum. In order to afford its students the opportunity to rise above their challenges and achieve the character and knowledge needed in order to fill the role of servant for their community. With the Learner Profiles and Attitudes of the IB MYP, Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School students go further than their peers toward meeting the needs of the world as a whole. It is with that knowledge that Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School fully embraces the ideals set forth in the IB MYP. 4

PTLAMS Academic Programs MYP STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School is a vibrant and diverse community whose purpose is to promote personal and intellectual growth. We provide challenging, engaging programs in a nurturing learning environment, devoting care and attention to every student. Embracing high standards of character, commitment, and achievement, Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School encourages students to think critically and creatively and to act ethically. GENERAL INFORMATION We believe that our curriculum should help students develop intellectual abilities and interests, social awareness, personal competencies, and a code of ethics. Hence, students explore courses in a variety of areas. The sequence of course requirements provides a balance between gaining a solid knowledge and learning foundation, exploring a wide range of inter-connected subjects, and obtaining needed skills for success in high school, college, and careers. The curriculum is designed to provide students with a wide range of opportunities and experiences, expanding their neurological capacity for life. In the Middle School, we emphasize deeper understanding and connections, as well as learning how to learn. As students begin to take more responsibility for their own learning, the faculty members remain supportive and nurture personal growth. Teachers work to build explicit links between subjects, with a theme-based approach, in order to deepen students understanding of the world in which they live and to enable students to ask higher-level thinking questions. Our hope is to engender students sense of wonder and possibility and develop a belief in every student that they are a powerful learner. Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School provides experiences that allow students to grow morally as well. We believe that we should prepare our students to be confident, independent, and responsible citizens. It is also our aim to help students learn to lead their day-to-day lives with compassion and kindness and to serve the needs of others. Finally, it is the fervent hope of Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School that students will have gained not only a personal vision, but also will take joy in the discovery and fulfillment of that vision. We work to endow them with the moral fiber to work through difficulty toward a true understanding of the way in which individual goals can harmonize with the greater good of the world. Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School's programs are committed to this development. 5

Section I STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY THIS SECTION CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING: DATA AND ANALYSIS OF THE DATA FOR 2013 2014, 2014 2015, and 2015-2016. Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School Testing Outcomes Dashboard Overall ELA & Math English Language Learners (ELL / EL) Special Education (SpEd / CMA) Low Socioeconomic (LSE / Title I) Comparisons ELA Comparisons Math Benchmark Outcomes Actual & Forecasted Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments & Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments California Standards Testing (CST / SBAC) Simulation: - English Language Arts - Mathematics - Science Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments & Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments Academic Performance Index (API / CAASPP) Simulation - English Language Arts - Mathematics - Science California English Language Development Test (CELDT) Other Local / Site Measures of Academic Achievement 6

PTLAMS Testing Outcomes Dashboard (2013 2014) Grade ELA Prof Levels Math Prof Levels 6 60.9% 45.7% 7 31% 17% Total 47% 32% Grade ELL ELA Prof Levels ELL Math Prof Levels 6 66.7% 77.8% 7 50% 56.3% Total 56% 64% Grade ELA Prof Levels SPED Math Prof Levels SPED 6 50% 0% 7 50% 0% Total 50% 0% Grade ELA Prof Levels Low SE Math Prof Levels Low SE 6 40% 50% 7 20% 20% Total 28% 32% 7

PTLAMS Testing Outcomes Dashboard (2013 2014) Grade ELA ALL ELL ELA ELA SPED ELA Low SE 6 60.9% 66.7% 50% 40% 7 31% 50% 50% 20% Total 47% 56% 50% 28% Grade Math ALL ELL Math Math SPED Math Low SE 6 45.7% 77.8% 0% 50% 7 17% 56.3% 0% 20% Total 32% 64% 0% 32% Benchmark ACTUAL FORECASTED Benchmark 1 Benchmark 2 Benchmark 3 Benchmark 4 Benchmark 5 652 0 655 0 714 674 710 782 749 731 8

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2013 2014) California Standards Testing (CST) Simulation (ELA) Table 1A: Academic Performance by Grade Level CST Simulation ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ELA Benchmark (Previous Year) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 2 18 15 5 4 6A 1 7 11 2 1 6B 1 11 4 3 3 7th Grade Total 1 9 10 8 10 7A 0 5 7 2 3 7B 1 4 3 6 7 ELA Benchmark (1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 2 11 20 7 4 6A 0 6 10 4 2 6B 2 5 10 3 2 7th Grade Total 0 4 24 8 2 7A 0 2 14 1 0 7B 0 2 10 7 2 ELA Benchmark (2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 0 7 25 10 5 6A 0 2 13 5 2 6B 0 5 12 5 3 7th Grade Total 0 4 25 12 3 7A 0 2 17 4 0 7B 0 2 8 8 3 ELA Benchmark (3 / 1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 4 (+2) 16 (+5) 16 (-4) 5 (-2) 2 (-2) 6A 0 6 10 2 (-2) 1 (-1) 6B 4 (+2) 10 (+5) 6 (-4) 3 1 (-1) 7th Grade Total 0 7 (+3) 27 (+3) 6 (-2) 0 (-2) 7A 0 2 13 (-1) 3 (+2) 0 7B 0 5 (+3) 14 (+4) 3 (-4) 0 (-2) ELA Benchmark (4 / 2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 0 8 (+1) 32 (+7) 4 (-6) 1 (-4) 6A 0 3 (+1) 16 (+3) 1 (-4) 1 (-1) 6B 0 5 16 (+4) 3 (-2) 0 (-3) 7th Grade Total 0 6 (+2) 27 (+2) 9 (-3) 0 (-3) 7A 0 3 (+1) 12 (-5) 4 0 7B 0 3 (+1) 15 (+7) 5 (-3) 0 (-3) ELA Benchmark (5 / 3) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 6 (+6) 20 (+12) 17 (-15) 2 (-2) 2 (+1) 6A 2 (+2) 9 (+6) 10 (-6) 1 1 6B 4 (+4) 11 (+6) 7 (-9) 1 (-2) 1 (+1) 7th Grade Total 0 12 (+6) 27 3 (-6) 1 (+1) 7A 0 5 (+2) 13 (+1) 1 (-3) 1 (+1) 7B 0 7 (+4) 14 (-1) 2 (-3) 0 9

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2013 2014) California Standards Testing (CST) Simulation (Math) Table 1B: Academic Performance by Grade Level CST Simulation MATHEMATICS Math Benchmark (Previous Year) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 4 19 12 8 1 6A 3 7 7 4 1 6B 1 12 5 4 0 7th Grade Total 1 4 16 17 0 7A 0 1 7 9 0 7B 1 3 9 8 0 Math Benchmark (1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 0 5 26 13 0 6A 0 1 12 9 0 6B 0 4 14 4 0 7th Grade Total 0 3 9 21 5 7A 0 1 7 5 4 7B 0 2 2 16 1 Math Benchmark (2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 0 6 28 13 0 6A 0 3 10 9 0 6B 0 3 18 4 0 7th Grade Total 0 2 18 19 5 7A 0 1 6 12 4 7B 0 1 12 7 1 Math Benchmark (3 / 1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 0 9 (+4) 23 (-3) 11 (-2) 0 6A 0 5 (+4) 8 (-4) 6 (-3) 0 6B 0 4 15 (+1) 5 (+1) 0 7th Grade Total 0 2 (-1) 16 (+7) 21 1 (-4) 7A 0 2 (+1) 6 (-1) 10 (+5) 0 (-4) 7B 0 0 (-2) 10 (+8) 11 (-5) 1 Math Benchmark (4 / 2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 0 11 (+5) 27 (-1) 7 (-6) 0 6A 0 4 (+1) 13 (+3) 4 (-5) 0 6B 0 7 (+4) 14 (-4) 3 (-1) 0 7th Grade Total 1 (+1) 2 18 19 2 (-3) 7A 1 (+1) 2 (+1) 8 (+2) 6 (-6) 2 (-2) 7B 0 0 (-1) 10 (-2) 13 (+6) 0 (-1) Math Benchmark (5 / 3) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 6th Grade Total 1 (+1) 20 (+9) 18 (-9) 8 (+1) 1 (+1) 6A 0 7 (+3) 10 (-3) 5 (+1) 1 (+1) 6B 1 (+1) 13 (+6) 8 (-6) 3 0 7th Grade Total 0 (-1) 7 (+5) 14 (-4) 18 (-1) 2 7A 0 (-1) 1 (-1) 7 (-1) 9 (+3) 1 (-1) 7B 0 6 (+6) 7 (-3) 9 (-4) 1 (+1) 10

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2013 2014) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Previous Year) Table 2A: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Previous Year ELA Math Total 6th Grade 745 784 728 6A 757 766 728 6B 734 801 720 7th Grade 615 676 625 7A 679 643 630 7B 563 702 619 2013 2014 API BENCHMARK PREVIOUS YEAR ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED 2 745 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 4 784 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 18 PROFICIENT 19 BASIC 15 BASIC 12 BELOW BASIC 5 BELOW BASIC 8 FAR BELOW BASIC 4 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 ELA 6 Special Ed Math 6 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 280 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 380 BASIC 1 Grade 7 API 554 BASIC 0 Grade 7 API 394 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 3 Total Sp Ed API 417 FAR BELOW BASIC 3 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 Total Sp Ed API 350 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED 1 615 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 1 767 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 9 PROFICIENT 4 BASIC 10 BASIC 16 BELOW BASIC 8 BELOW BASIC 17 FAR BELOW BASIC 10 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Special Ed Math 7 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 280 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 305 BASIC 2 Grade 7 API 554 BASIC 1 Grade 7 API 454 BELOW BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 3 Total Sp Ed API 417 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 350 74 Regular Ed 74 Regular Ed _9 Special Ed _9 Special Ed 83 Total Students 83 Total Students 658 Total Current API without CMA Bump and no correlation for 6th Grade Science Forecast with continued % growth = API by CST 11

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2013 2014) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 1) Table 2B: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Total / ELA Math Benchmark 1 Bridge 6th Grade 709 689 677 6A 694 655 655 6B 723 724 710 7th Grade 689 577 636 7A 748 573 655 7B 641 580 617 2013 2014 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 1 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED 2 709 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 689 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 11 PROFICIENT 5 BASIC 20 BASIC 26 BELOW BASIC 7 BELOW BASIC 13 FAR BELOW BASIC 4 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed Math 6 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 200 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 555 BASIC 1 BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 3 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED 0 683 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 567 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 4 PROFICIENT 3 BASIC 24 BASIC 9 BELOW BASIC 8 BELOW BASIC 21 FAR BELOW BASIC 2 FAR BELOW BASIC 5 ELA 7 Special Ed Math 7 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 634 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 494 BASIC 2 BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 2 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 79 Regular Ed 79 Regular Ed _9 Special Ed _9 Special Ed 88 Total Students 88 Total Students 652 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with continued % growth = API by CST 12

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2013 2014) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 2) Table 2C: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Total / ELA Math Benchmark 2 Bridge 6th Grade 674 707 669 6A 681 685 654 6B 669 725 682 7th Grade 662 607 634 7A 725 549 640 7B 662 657 628 2013 2014 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 2 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED 0 674 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 707 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 7 PROFICIENT 6 BASIC 25 BASIC 28 BELOW BASIC 8 BELOW BASIC 10 FAR BELOW BASIC 4 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed Math 6 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 355 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 455 BASIC 0 BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 3 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED 0 662 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 607 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 4 PROFICIENT 2 BASIC 21 BASIC 17 BELOW BASIC 11 BELOW BASIC 15 FAR BELOW BASIC 3 FAR BELOW BASIC 3 ELA 7 Special Ed Math 7 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 634 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 514 BASIC 4 BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 4 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 80 Regular Ed 80 Regular Ed _9 Special Ed _9 Special Ed 89 Total Students 89 Total Students 655 Total Current API without CMA Bump, With Only 6 Weeks Measured Instead of 8-10 Forecast with continued 1% growth = 674 API by CST 13

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2013 2014) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 3) Table 2D: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Total / ELA Math Benchmark 3 Bridge 6th Grade 775 714 738 6A 736 711 720 6B 805 716 753 7th Grade 740 630 689 7A 725 647 680 7B 752 616 697 2013 2014 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 3 / 1 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED 4 775 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 714 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 16 PROFICIENT 9 BASIC 16 BASIC 23 BELOW BASIC 5 BELOW BASIC 11 FAR BELOW BASIC 2 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed Math 6 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 489 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 655 BASIC 2 BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED 0 740 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 630 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 7 PROFICIENT 2 BASIC 27 BASIC 16 BELOW BASIC 6 BELOW BASIC 21 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 ELA 7 Special Ed Math 7 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 712 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 2 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 474 BASIC 1 BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 4 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 83 Regular Ed 83 Regular Ed _7 Special Ed _7 Special Ed 90 Total Students 90 Total Students 714 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with continued 9.5% growth = 782 API by CST 14

API Benchmark Benchmark 4 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2013 2014) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 4) Table 2E: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total ELA (No SpEd) Math (No SpEd) 6th Grade 731 740 6A 720 724 6B 740 754 7th Grade 721 640 7A 725 655 Total / Bridge 734 No SpEd 721 w/ SpEd 721 No SpEd 697 w/ SpEd 746 No SpEd 743 w/ SpEd 689 No SpEd 682 w/ SpEd 708 No SpEd 691 w/ SpEd 7B 718 626 681 2013 2014 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 4 / 2 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED 0 731 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 740 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 8 PROFICIENT 11 BASIC 32 BASIC 27 BELOW BASIC 4 BELOW BASIC 7 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed Math 6 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 574 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 555 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 1 Grade 6 API 718 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 725 BASIC 2 BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 2 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED 0 721 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 1 640 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 6 PROFICIENT 2 BASIC 27 BASIC 18 BELOW BASIC 7 BELOW BASIC 19 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 2 ELA 7 Special Ed Math 7 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 674 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 324 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 719 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 626 BASIC 2 BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 87 Regular Ed 87 Regular Ed _6 Special Ed _6 Special Ed 93 Total Students 93 Total Students 710 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with continued??.??% growth =??? API by CST 15

API Benchmark Benchmark 5 STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2013 2014) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 5) Table 2F: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total ELA (No SpEd) Math (No SpEd) 6th Grade 811 764 6A 793 716 6B 829 807 7th Grade 762 657 7A 748 623 7B 775 685 Total / Bridge 792 No SpEd 778 w/ SpEd 762 No SpEd 755 w/ SpEd 820 No SpEd 802 w/ SpEd 720 No SpEd 716 w/ SpEd 698 No SpEd 692 w/ SpEd 739 No SpEd 739 w/ SpEd 2013 2014 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 5 / 3 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED 6 811 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 1 764 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 20 PROFICIENT 20 BASIC 17 BASIC 18 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 8 FAR BELOW BASIC 2 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 ELA 6 Special Ed Math 6 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 618 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 605 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 2 Grade 6 API 796 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 6 API 752 BASIC 1 BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED 0 762 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 657 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 12 PROFICIENT 7 BASIC 27 BASIC 15 BELOW BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 19 FAR BELOW BASIC 1 FAR BELOW BASIC 2 ELA 7 Special Ed Math 7 Special Ed ADVANCED 0 733 API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 541 API Total Sp Ed PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 760 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 649 BASIC 2 BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 2 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 91 Regular Ed 91 Regular Ed _7 Special Ed _7 Special Ed 98 Total Students 98 Total Students 749 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with continued??.??% growth =??? API by CST 16

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA FINAL OUTCOME Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2013 2014) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation 17

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA OVERALL GROWTH Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2013 2014) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation All Class ELA Growth (Omer) ELA Prof Levels (Omer) Math Growth (Downey) Math Prof Levels (Downey) 6A 17/21 = 81% 13/21 = 62% 16/21 = 76.2% 7/21 = 33.3% 6B 18/25 = 72% 15/25 = 60% 21/25 = 84% 14/25 = 56% Grade 6 All Total 35/46 = 76.1% 28/46 = 60.9% 37/46 = 80.4% 21/46 = 45.7% All Class ELA Growth (Marquez) ELA Prof Levels (Marquez) Math Growth (Chen) Math Prof Levels (Chen) 7A 9/19 = 47.4% 6/19 = 32% 10/19 = 53% 1/19 = 5.3% 7B 12/23 = 52.2% 7/23 = 30.4% 15/23 = 65.2% 6/23 = 26.1% Grade 7 All Total 21/42 = 50% 13/42 = 31% 25/42 = 60% 7/42 = 17% PTLAMS All Total 56/88 = 64% 41/88 = 47% 62/88 = 70.5% 28/88 = 32% EL ELA Growth (Omer) ELA Prof Levels (Omer) Math Growth (Downey) Math Prof Levels (Downey) 6A 7/9 = 77.8% 6/9 = 66.7% 8/9 = 88.9% 7/9 = 77.8% 6B N/A N/A N/A N/A Grade 6 EL Total 7/9 = 77.8% 6/9 = 66.7% 8/9 = 88.9.8% 7/9 = 77.8% EL ELA Growth (Marquez) ELA Prof Levels (Marquez) Math Growth (Chen) Math Prof Levels (Chen) 7A 9/14 = 64.3% 7/14 = 50% 10/14 = 71.4% 8/14 = 57.1% 7B 1/2 = 50% 1/2 = 50% 2/2 = 100% 1/2 = 50% Grade 7 EL Total 10/16 = 62.5% 8/16 = 50% 12/16 = 75% 9/16 = 56.3% PTLAMS EL Total 17/25 = 68% 14/25 = 56% 20/25 = 80% 16/25 = 64% SpEd ELA Growth (Omer) ELA Prof Levels (Omer) Math Growth (Downey) Math Prof Levels (Downey) 6A 3/3 = 100% 2/3 = 67% 1/3 = 33.3% 0/3 = 0% 6B 0/1 = 0% 0/1 = 0% 1/1 = 100% 0/1 = 0% Grade 6 SpEd Total 3/4 = 75% 2/4 = 50% 2/4 = 50% 0/4 = 0% SpEd ELA Growth (Marquez) ELA Prof Levels (Marquez) Math Growth (Chen) Math Prof Levels (Chen) 7A 1/2 = 50% 1/2 = 50% 2/2 = 100% 0/2 = 0% 7B No SpEd Students No SpEd Students No SpEd Students No SpEd Students Grade 7 SpEd Total 1/2 = 50% 1/2 = 50% 2/2 = 100% 0/2 = 0% PTLAMS SpEd Total 2/4 = 50% 2/4 = 50% 4/4 = 100% 0/4 = 0% 18

Grade Student Is Currently Enrolled STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY California English Language Development Test (CELDT) (2013 2014) Table 3A: Academic Performance by Grade Level CELDT Grade 6 CELDT Overall Oct. 2013 Grade 6 CELDT 2013-2014 Reclassify (Date) Last Name First Name Listening Oct. 2013 Speaking Oct. 2013 Reading Oct. 2013 Writing Oct. 2013 CST ELA May 2012 6 January 2012 6 6 6 February 2011 6 394 February 2010 6 3 3 3 4 4 349 / 3 6 January 2011 6 6 4 4 3 4 4 February 2014 6 January 2012 6 5 5 5 5 5 February 2014 6 6 January 2012 6 6 394 6 January 2012 6 6 4 5 5 1 3 237 / 2 6 6 304 6 4 5 4 4 3 314 / 3 February 2014 6 595 533 526 589 551 Sept. 2012 6 5 5 3 5 5 February 2014 6 6 6 January 2012 6 263 6 221 194 222 256 246 October 2011 6 292 6 6 433 February 2009 6 311 February 2013 6 329 6 349 English Only 6 6 6 394 6 3 5 2 3 3 292 / 2 6 6 4 5 3 4 4 308 / 3 February 2014 6 349 6 January 2012 6 January 2012 6 342 6 342 English Only 6 January 2012 6 389 February 2010 6 January 2012 6 4 4 3 5 3 273 February 2014 6 Orange = Reclassified Green = Needs To Be Re-Tested 2014-2015 2014 Prepa Tec Los Angeles EL Reclassification Rate Percentage: 15 out of 25 = 60% 19

Grade Student Is Currently Enrolled STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY California English Language Development Test (CELDT) (2013 2014) Table 3B: Academic Performance by Grade Level CELDT Grade 7 CELDT Overall Oct. 2013 Grade 7 CELDT 2013-2014 Reclassify (Date) Last Name First Name Listening Oct. 2013 Speaking Oct. 2013 Reading Oct. 2013 Writing Oct. 2013 CST ELA May 2012 7 292 7 7 2 2 2 1 2 257 Sept. 2012 7 7 407 July 2008 7 3 3 4 3 3 7 320 7 7 7 7 English Only 333 English Only 7 5 5 5 4 4 272 February 2014 7 339 January 2009 7 January 2009 7 292 7 7 367 7 441 Nov. 2006 7 307 7 265 7 7 4 5 3 3 3 241 February 2014 7 339 7 461 August 2009 7 3 3 3 4 4 7 323 7 379 7 7 311 March 2012 7 4 4 3 4 4 329 February 2014 7 311 7 3 4 3 2 3 261 7 275 7 329 7 7 314 7 375 7 3 4 3 3 2 217 7 4 3 4 5 4 February 2014 7 5 5 4 5 5 February 2014 7 301 7 336 7 2 3 3 1 2 261 7 4 3 4 3 5 314 February 2014 7 392 7 4 4 3 3 4 292 February 2014 7 Orange = Reclassified Green = Needs To Be Re-Tested 2014-2015 2014 Prepa Tec Los Angeles EL Reclassification Rate Percentage: 15 out of 25 = 60% 20

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2014 2015) California Standards Testing (CST) Simulation (ELA Part 1 of 2) Table 1A: Academic Performance by Grade Level CST Simulation ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ELA Benchmark (Previous Year) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C ELA Benchmark (1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 2 55 (2 SpEd) 25 (2 SpEd) 2 (2 SpEd) N/A 6A 0 10 9 0 N/A 6B 0 15 (2 SpEd) 2 (1 SpEd) 0 N/A 6C 1 9 7 1 (1 SpEd) N/A 6D 1 11 3 (1 SpEd) 1 N/A 6E 0 10 4 1 (1 SpEd) N/A 7th Grade Total 6 46 (1 SpEd) 18 (4 SpEd) 5 (1 SpEd) N/A 7A 4 12 7 (2 SpEd) 2 N/A 7B 2 14 7 (2 SpEd) 1 (1 SpEd) N/A 7C 0 20 (1 SpEd) 4 2 N/A 8th Grade Total 3 22 (1 SpEd) 21 (1 SpEd) 13 (2 SpEd) N/A 8A 2 5 (1 SpEd) 6 6 (1 SpEd) N/A 8B 1 8 8 (1 SpEd) 3 (1 SpEd) N/A 8C 0 9 7 4 N/A ELA Benchmark (2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 10 58 (1 SpEd) 15 (6 SpEd) 4 (1 SpEd) N/A 6A 4 12 4 0 N/A 6B 1 14 2 (3 SpEd) 0 N/A 6C 1 14 2 (1 SpEd) 1 N/A 6D 2 9 3 (1 SpEd) 1 (1 SpEd) N/A 6E 2 9 (1 SpEd) 4 (1 SpEd) 2 N/A 7th Grade Total 4 44 (1 SpEd) 23 (4 SpEd) 5 (2 SpEd) N/A 7A 2 16 (1 SpEd) 5 2 (2 SpEd) N/A 7B 2 11 11 (3 SpEd) 1 N/A 7C 0 17 7 (1 SpEd) 2 N/A 8th Grade Total 1 35 19 (3 SpEd) 4 (1 SpEd) N/A 8A 0 16 5 0 N/A 8B 1 11 6 (3 SpEd) (1 SpEd) N/A 8C 0 8 8 4 N/A 21

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2014 2015) California Standards Testing (CST) Simulation (ELA Part 2 of 2) Table 1A: Academic Performance by Grade Level CST Simulation ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ELA Benchmark (3 / 1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 11 53 (3 SpEd) 22 (4 SpEd) 4 (2 SpEd) N/A 6A 1 15 4 0 N/A 6B 5 11 (1 SpEd) 1 (2 SpEd) 0 N/A 6C 3 10 6 (1 SpEd) 0 N/A 6D 1 7 6 (1 SpEd) 2 (2 SpEd) N/A 6E 1 10 (2 SpEd) 5 2 N/A 7th Grade Total 6 46 (3 SpEd) 20 (3 SpEd) 5 (1 SpEd) N/A 7A 2 20 (2 SpEd) 3 (1 SpEd) 0 N/A 7B 1 12 7 (2 SpEd) 5 (1 SpEd) N/A 7C 3 14 (1 SpEd) 10 0 N/A 8th Grade Total 2 20 (2 SpEd) 31 8 (3 SpEd) N/A 8A 2 13 5 1 N/A 8B 0 5 (2 SpEd) 13 1 (2 SpEd) N/A 8C 0 2 13 6 (1 SpEd) N/A ELA Benchmark (4 / 2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 8 48 (1 SpEd) 30 (6 SpEd) 4 (2 SpEd) N/A 6A 1 13 5 1 N/A 6B 1 13 3 (2 SpEd) (1 SpEd) N/A 6C 1 8 9 (1 SpEd) 0 N/A 6D 4 9 2 (2 SpEd) 1 (1 SpEd) N/A 6E 1 5 (1 SpEd) 11 (1 SpEd) 0 N/A 7th Grade Total 9 47 (2 SpEd) 17 (5 SpEd) 2 N/A 7A 4 16 (1 SpEd) 4 (2 SpEd) 0 N/A 7B 2 17 5 (3 SpEd) 1 N/A 7C 3 14 (1 SpEd) 8 1 N/A 8th Grade Total 5 29 (1 SpEd) 19 (2 SpEd) 7 (2 SpEd) N/A 8A 4 13 4 0 N/A 8B 1 9 (1 SpEd) 8 (2 SpEd) 1 N/A 8C 0 7 7 6 (2 SpEd) N/A 22

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2014 2015) California Standards Testing (CST) Simulation (Math Part 1 of 2) Table 1B: Academic Performance by Grade Level CST Simulation MATHEMATICS Math Benchmark (Previous Year) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C Math Benchmark (1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 0 11 34 (5 SpEd) 40 (1 SpEd) N/A 6A 0 2 8 9 N/A 6B 0 4 8 (2 SpEd) 5 (1 SpEd) N/A 6C 0 0 3 14 (1 SpEd) N/A 6D 0 3 8 (1 SpEd) 6 N/A 6E 0 2 7 (2 SpEd) 6 N/A 7th Grade Total 0 13 29 (2 SpEd) 31 (4 SpEd) N/A 7A 0 4 14 7 (2 SpEd) N/A 7B 0 9 4 (1 SpEd) 11 (2 SpEd) N/A 7C 0 0 11 (1 SpEd) 14 N/A 8th Grade Total 1 4 17 (1 SpEd) 37 (3 SpEd) N/A 8A 1 3 5 10 (2 SpEd) N/A 8B 0 0 6 (1 SpEd) 15 (1 SpEd) N/A 8C 0 1 6 12 N/A Math Benchmark (2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 3 5 37 (1 SpEd) 42 (7 SpEd) N/A 6A 0 1 7 12 N/A 6B 0 1 8 8 (3 SpEd) N/A 6C 3 0 8 7 (1 SpEd) N/A 6D 0 1 5 9 (2 SpEd) N/A 6E 0 2 9 (1 SpEd) 6 (1 SpEd) N/A 7th Grade Total 3 18 (1 SpEd) 19 36 (6 SpEd) N/A 7A 0 8 7 10 (3 SpEd) N/A 7B 1 3 6 15 (3 SpEd) N/A 7C 2 7 (1 SpEd) 6 11 N/A 8th Grade Total 4 22 (1 SpEd) 15 (1 SpEd) 18 (3 SpEd) N/A 8A 4 10 4 3 N/A 8B 0 7 (1 SpEd) 7 (1 SpEd) 4 (2 SpEd) N/A 8C 0 5 4 11 (1 SpEd) N/A 23

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2014 2015) California Standards Testing (CST) Simulation (Math Part 2 of 2) Table 1B: Academic Performance by Grade Level CST Simulation MATHEMATICS Math Benchmark (3 / 1) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 4 23 44 (3 SpEd) 18 (6 SpEd) N/A 6A 1 2 8 9 N/A 6B 0 7 8 (2 SpEd) 2 (1 SpEd) N/A 6C 0 1 13 5 (1 SpEd) N/A 6D 2 5 7 1 (3 SpEd) N/A 6E 1 8 8 (1 SpEd) 1 (1 SpEd) N/A 7th Grade Total 7 29 (1 SpEd) 20 (1 SpEd) 21 (4 SpEd) N/A 7A 3 8 5 8 (3 SpEd) N/A 7B 1 8 (1 SpEd) 9 8 (1 SpEd) N/A 7C 3 13 6 (1 SpEd) 5 N/A 8th Grade Total 5 15 16 (1 SpEd) 24 (5 SpEd) N/A 8A 5 8 3 5 N/A 8B 0 3 8 (1 SpEd) 8 (3 SpEd) N/A 8C 0 4 5 11 (2 SpEd) N/A Math Benchmark (4 / 2) Grade/Teacher Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic + / - 6th Grade Total 17 23 (1 SpEd) 39 (6 SpEd) 10 (2 SpEd) N/A 6A 4 3 10 3 N/A 6B 3 7 (1 SpEd) 7 (2 SpEd) 0 N/A 6C 4 5 8 2 (1 SpEd) N/A 6D 3 4 7 (2 SpEd) 2 (1 SpEd) N/A 6E 3 4 7 (2 SpEd) 3 N/A 7th Grade Total 7 24 25 (3 SpEd) 18 (3 SpEd) N/A 7A 2 8 7 6 (3 SpEd) N/A 7B 3 6 10 (3 SpEd) 6 N/A 7C 2 10 (1 SpEd) 8 6 N/A 8th Grade Total 7 14 13 (1 SpEd) 26 (5 SpEd) N/A 8A 7 6 4 4 N/A 8B 0 6 5 (1 SpEd) 8 (2 SpEd) N/A 8C 0 2 4 14 (3 SpEd) N/A 24

API Benchmark Previous Year 6th Grade 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 7th Grade 7A 7B 7C 8th Grade 8A 8B 8C STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2014 2015) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Previous Year) Table 2A: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total ELA Math Total / Bridge 2014 2015 API BENCHMARK PREVIOUS YEAR ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED??? API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED??? API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT PROFICIENT BASIC BASIC BELOW BASIC BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED Grade 6 API??? ADVANCED Grade 6 API??? PROFICIENT Grade 7 API??? PROFICIENT Grade 7 API??? BASIC Grade 8 API??? BASIC Grade 8 API??? BELOW BASIC BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API??? FAR BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED??? API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED??? API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT PROFICIENT BASIC BASIC BELOW BASIC BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED Grade 6 API??? ADVANCED Grade 6 API??? PROFICIENT Grade 7 API??? PROFICIENT Grade 7 API??? BASIC Grade 8 API??? BASIC Grade 8 API??? BELOW BASIC BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API??? FAR BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg ADVANCED??? API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED??? API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT PROFICIENT BASIC BASIC BELOW BASIC BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED Grade 6 API??? ADVANCED Grade 6 API??? PROFICIENT Grade 7 API??? PROFICIENT Grade 7 API??? BASIC Grade 8 API??? BASIC Grade 8 API??? BELOW BASIC BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API??? FAR BELOW BASIC FAR BELOW BASIC Total Sp Ed API?????? Regular Ed??? Regular Ed??? Special Ed??? Special Ed??? Total Students??? Total Students??? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued??.?? % growth = API by CST / SBAC 25

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2014 2015) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 1) Table 2B: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Benchmark 1 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade 845 657 759 6A 820 652 753 6B 883 711 797 6C 839 564 713 6D 855 689 778 6E 832 672 751 7th Grade 857 685 777 7A 855 711 782 7B 858 721 779 7C 858 627 768 8th Grade 776 631 709 8A 754 677 710 8B 794 603 701 8C 778 622 717 2014 2015 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 1 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED 2 845 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 657 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 55 PROFICIENT 11 BASIC 25 BASIC 34 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 40 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 647 Grade 6 API ADVANCED 0 598 Grade 6 API PROFICIENT 2 670 Grade 7 API PROFICIENT 0 541 Grade 7 API BASIC 2 618 Grade 8 API BASIC 5 524 Grade 8 API BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 2 648 Total Sp Ed API FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 685 Total Sp Ed API ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED 6 857 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 685 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 46 PROFICIENT 13 BASIC 18 BASIC 29 BELOW BASIC 5 BELOW BASIC 31 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 647 Grade 6 API ADVANCED 0 598 Grade 6 API PROFICIENT 1 670 Grade 7 API PROFICIENT 0 541 Grade 7 API BASIC 4 618 Grade 8 API BASIC 2 524 Grade 8 API BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 4 648 Total Sp Ed API FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 561 Total Sp Ed API ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg ADVANCED 3 776 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 1 631 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 22 PROFICIENT 4 BASIC 21 BASIC 17 BELOW BASIC 13 BELOW BASIC 37 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 647 Grade 6 API ADVANCED 0 598 Grade 6 API PROFICIENT 1 670 Grade 7 API PROFICIENT 0 541 Grade 7 API BASIC 1 618 Grade 8 API BASIC 1 524 Grade 8 API BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 3 648 Total Sp Ed API FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 561 Total Sp Ed API 218 Regular Ed 217 Regular Ed 16 Special Ed 17 Special Ed 234 Total Students 234 Total Students 752 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued??.?? % growth = API by CST / SBAC 26

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2014 2015) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 2) Table 2C: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Benchmark 2 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade 870 652 766 6A 893 617 783 6B 890 645 759 6C 870 701 790 6D 860 620 735 6E 833 678 760 7th Grade 843 698 769 7A 859 715 774 7B 832 652 742 7C 838 725 791 8th Grade 834 764 792 8A 872 851 864 8B 863 763 786 8C 769 726 726 2014 2015 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 2 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED 10 870 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 3 652 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 58 PROFICIENT 5 BASIC 15 BASIC 37 BELOW BASIC 4 BELOW BASIC 42 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 652 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 480 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 642 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 528 BASIC 6 Grade 8 API 624 BASIC 1 Grade 8 API 589 BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 7 Total Sp Ed API 636 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 524 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED 4 843 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 3 698 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 44 PROFICIENT 18 BASIC 23 BASIC 19 BELOW BASIC 5 BELOW BASIC 36 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 652 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 480 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 642 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 528 BASIC 4 Grade 8 API 624 BASIC 0 Grade 8 API 589 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 6 Total Sp Ed API 636 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 524 ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg ADVANCED 1 834 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 4 764 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 35 PROFICIENT 22 BASIC 19 BASIC 15 BELOW BASIC 4 BELOW BASIC 18 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 652 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 480 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 642 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 528 BASIC 3 Grade 8 API 624 BASIC 1 Grade 8 API 589 BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 3 Total Sp Ed API 636 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 524 222 Regular Ed 222 Regular Ed 19 Special Ed 20 Special Ed 241 Total Students 242 Total Students 774 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued 2.1 % growth = 806 API by CST / SBAC 27

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2014 2015) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 3 / 1) Table 2D: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Benchmark 3 / 1 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade 859 744 795 6A 875 671 793 6B 930 777 838 6C 868 685 784 6D 799 796 750 6E 820 812 807 7th Grade 856 782 813 7A 903 779 833 7B 795 743 759 7C 868 820 846 8th Grade 780 725 743 8A 866 830 852 8B 775 683 715 8C 699 658 669 2014 2015 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 3 / 1 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED 11 859 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 4 744 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 53 PROFICIENT 23 BASIC 22 BASIC 44 BELOW BASIC 4 BELOW BASIC 19 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 669 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 522 PROFICIENT 3 Grade 7 API 721 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 585 BASIC 4 Grade 8 API 624 BASIC 3 Grade 8 API 508 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 6 Total Sp Ed API 676 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 538 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED 7 856 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 8 782 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 45 PROFICIENT 29 BASIC 20 BASIC 19 BELOW BASIC 5 BELOW BASIC 8 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 669 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 522 PROFICIENT 3 Grade 7 API 721 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 585 BASIC 3 Grade 8 API 624 BASIC 2 Grade 8 API 508 BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 4 Total Sp Ed API 676 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 538 ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg ADVANCED 2 780 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 5 725 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 20 PROFICIENT 15 BASIC 31 BASIC 16 BELOW BASIC 8 BELOW BASIC 25 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 669 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 522 PROFICIENT 2 Grade 7 API 721 PROFICIENT 0 Grade 7 API 585 BASIC 0 Grade 8 API 624 BASIC 1 Grade 8 API 508 BELOW BASIC 3 BELOW BASIC 4 Total Sp Ed API 676 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 538 228 Regular Ed 228 Regular Ed 21 Special Ed 22 Special Ed 249 Total Students 250 Total Students 787 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued 1.7% growth = 801 API by CST / SBAC 28

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2014 2015) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 4 / 2) Table 2E: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark Benchmark 4 / 2 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade 840 808 809 6A 847 785 822 6B 880 853 835 6C 823 817 808 6D 889 803 813 6E 798 787 784 7th Grade 879 780 825 7A 906 774 829 7B 874 769 815 7C 860 783 830 8th Grade 825 728 771 8A 905 851 883 8B 827 710 763 8C 740 617 671 2014 2015 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 4 / 2 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg ADVANCED 10 840 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 18 808 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 50 PROFICIENT 26 BASIC 30 BASIC 39 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 9 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 630 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 630 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 724 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 614 BASIC 7 Grade 8 API 629 BASIC 7 Grade 8 API 514 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 2 Total Sp Ed API 661 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 597 ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg ADVANCED 10 879 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 9 780 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 47 PROFICIENT 26 BASIC 17 BASIC 21 BELOW BASIC 2 BELOW BASIC 18 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 630 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 630 PROFICIENT 2 Grade 7 API 724 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 614 BASIC 5 Grade 8 API 629 BASIC 3 Grade 8 API 514 BELOW BASIC 0 BELOW BASIC 3 Total Sp Ed API 661 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 597 ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg ADVANCED 5 825 API Total Non Sp Ed ADVANCED 9 728 API Total Non-Sp Ed PROFICIENT 29 PROFICIENT 20 BASIC 19 BASIC 11 BELOW BASIC 8 BELOW BASIC 23 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 630 ADVANCED 0 Grade 6 API 630 PROFICIENT 2 Grade 7 API 724 PROFICIENT 1 Grade 7 API 614 BASIC 2 Grade 8 API 629 BASIC 2 Grade 8 API 514 BELOW BASIC 1 BELOW BASIC 2 Total Sp Ed API 661 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 FAR BELOW BASIC 0 Total Sp Ed API 597 229 Regular Ed 229 Regular Ed 22 Special Ed 22 Special Ed 251 Total Students 251 Total Students 811 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued 3.3 % growth = 839 API by CST / SBAC 29

811 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with 3.3% growth = 839 API by SBAC SWD = 657 EL = 744 LSE = 821 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA All Students PTLAMS ELA All 251 Total PTLAMS ELA All % ADVANCED 25 9.92% PROFICIENT 131 52.00% BASIC 81 32.14% BELOW BASIC 15 5.95% FAR BELOW BASIC 0 0.00% PTLAMS ELA All API Total 837 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA SWD Only Students PTLAMS ELA SWD Only 22 Total PTLAMS ELA SWD Only % ADVANCED 0 0.00% PROFICIENT 5 22.80% BASIC 14 64.00% BELOW BASIC 3 13.70% FAR BELOW BASIC 0 0.00% PTLAMS ELA SWD Only API Total 678 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA EL Only Students PTLAMS ELA EL Only 46 Total PTLAMS ELA EL Only % ADVANCED 1 2.20% PROFICIENT 20 43.50% BASIC 17 37.00% BELOW BASIC 8 17.40% FAR BELOW BASIC 0 0.00% PTLAMS ELA EL Only API Total 770 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA Title 1 (Low SocioEconomic) Students PTLAMS ELA Title 1 Only 199 Total PTLAMS ELA Title 1 Only % ADVANCED 20 10.10% PROFICIENT 112 56.30% BASIC 56 28.20% BELOW BASIC 11 5.50% FAR BELOW BASIC 0 0.00% PTLAMS ELA Title 1 Only API Total 846 30

811 Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with 3.3% growth = 839 API by SBAC SWD = 657 EL = 744 LSE = 821 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math All Students PTLAMS Math All 251 Total PTLAMS Math All % ADVANCED 36 14.30% PROFICIENT 75 29.80% BASIC 83 33.00% BELOW BASIC 58 23.00% FAR BELOW BASIC 0 0.00% PTLAMS Math All API Total 777 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math SWD Only Students PTLAMS Math SWD Only 22 Total PTLAMS Math SWD Only % ADVANCED 0 0.00% PROFICIENT 3 13.70% BASIC 12 54.60% BELOW BASIC 7 31.80% FAR BELOW BASIC 0 0.00% PTLAMS Math SWD Only API Total 626 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math EL Only Students PTLAMS Math EL Only 46 Total PTLAMS Math EL Only % ADVANCED 3 6.50% PROFICIENT 9 19.60% BASIC 18 39.10% BELOW BASIC 16 34.80% FAR BELOW BASIC 0 0.00% PTLAMS ELA Math Only API Total 706 PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math Title 1 (Low SocioEconomic) Students PTLAMS Math Title 1 Only 199 Total PTLAMS Math Title 1 Only % ADVANCED 29 14.60% PROFICIENT 62 31.20% BASIC 65 32.70% BELOW BASIC 43 21.60% FAR BELOW BASIC 0 0.00% PTLAMS Math Title 1 Only API Total 784 31

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA OVERALL GROWTH Success For All 4Sight Benchmark Assessments (2014 2015) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation All Class ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 6A 18 / 20 = 90% 15 / 20 = 75% 17 / 20 = 85% 15 / 20 = 75% 6B 14 / 20 = 70% 13 / 20 = 65% 16 / 20 = 80% 15 / 20 = 75% 6C 12 / 20 = 60% 11 / 20 = 55% 19 / 20 = 95% 18 / 20 = 90% 6D 17 / 20 = 85% 16 / 20 = 80% 16 / 20 = 80% 16 / 20 = 80% 6E 15 / 19 = 79% 13 / 19 = 69% 14 / 19 = 74% 13 / 19 = 69% Grade 6 All Total 76 / 99 = 77% 68 / 99 = 69% 82 / 99 = 83% 77 / 99 = 78% All Class ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 7A 23 / 28 = 82% 20 / 28 = 72% 21 / 28 = 75% 19 / 28 = 68% 7B 20 / 28 = 72% 18 / 28 = 65% 20 / 28 = 72% 17 / 28 = 61% 7C 18 / 27 = 67% 17 / 27 = 63% 22 / 27 = 82% 20 / 27 = 74% Grade 7 All Total 61 / 83 = 74% 55 / 83 = 66% 63 / 83 = 76% 56 / 83 = 68% All Class ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 8A 16 / 21 = 76% 15 / 21 = 72% 18 / 21 = 86% 16 / 21 = 76% 8B 16 / 23 = 70% 14 / 23 = 61% 17 / 23 = 74% 16 / 23 = 70% 8C 16 / 23 = 70% 13 / 23 = 57% 15 / 23 = 65% 14 / 23 = 61% Grade 8 All Total 48 / 67 = 72% 42 / 67 = 63% 50 / 67 = 75% 46 / 67 = 69% PTLAMS All Total 185 / 249 = 75% 165 / 249 = 67% 195 / 249 = 79% 179 / 249 = 72% EL ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 6A 3 / 3 = 100% 2 / 3 = 67% 3 / 3 = 100% 2 / 3 = 67% 6B 4 / 5 = 80% 4 / 5 = 80% 4 / 5 = 80% 4 / 5 = 80% 6C 2 / 2 = 100% 1 / 2 = 50% 2 / 2 = 100% 1 / 2 = 50% 6D 2 / 4 = 50% 1 / 4 = 25% 2 / 4 = 50% 1 / 4 = 25% 6E 4 / 4 = 100% 3 / 4 = 75% 1 / 4 = 25% 1 / 4 = 25% Grade 6 EL Total 15 / 18 = 83% 11 / 18 = 61% 12 / 18 = 67% 9 / 18 = 50% EL ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 7A 7 / 9 = 78% 5 / 9 = 56% 8 / 9 = 89% 5 / 9 = 56% 7B 3 / 4 = 75% 1 / 4 = 25% 3 / 4 = 75% 2 / 4 = 50% 7C 0 / 1 = 0% 0 / 1 = 0% 0 / 1 = 0% 0 / 1 = 0% Grade 7 EL Total 10 / 14 = 72% 6 / 14 = 43% 11 / 14 = 79% 7 / 14 = 50% EL ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 8A 0 / 1 = 0% 0 / 1 = 0% 1 / 1 = 100% 1 / 1 = 100% 8B 2 / 4 = 50% 2 / 4 = 50% 2 / 4 = 50% 2 / 4 = 50% 8C 6 / 9 = 67% 4 / 9 = 45% 5 / 9 = 56% 4 / 9 = 45% Grade 8 EL Total 8 / 14 = 57% 6 / 14 = 43% 8 / 14 = 57% 7 / 14 = 50% PTLAMS All Total 33 / 46 = 72% 23 / 46 = 50% 31 / 46 = 68% 23 / 46 = 50% SpEd ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 6A 0 / 0 = N/A 0 / 0 = N/A 0 / 0 = N/A 0 / 0 = N/A 6B 0 / 3 = 0% 0 / 3 = 0% 2 / 3 = 67% 2 / 3 = 67% 6C 1 / 1 = 100% 1 / 1 = 100% 1 / 1 = 100% 0 / 1 = 0% 6D 2 / 3 = 67% 1 / 3 = 33% 2 / 3 = 67% 0 / 3 = 0% 6E 2 / 2 = 100% 1 / 2 = 50% 0 / 2 = 0% 0 / 2 = 0% Grade 6 SpEd Total 5 / 9 = 56% 3 / 9 = 33% 5 / 9 = 56% 2 / 9 = 22% SpEd ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 7A 3 / 3 = 100% 2 / 3 = 67% 2 / 3 = 67% 1 / 3 = 33% 7B 3 / 3 = 100% 1 / 3 = 33% 3 / 3 = 100% 2 / 3 = 67% 7C 1 / 1 = 100% 1 / 1 = 100% 0 / 1 = 0% 0 / 1 = 0% Grade 7 SpEd Total 7 / 7 = 100% 4 / 7 = 57% 5 / 7 = 72% 3 / 7 = 43% SpEd ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 8A 0 / 0 = N/A 0 / 0 = N/A 0 / 0 = N/A 0 / 0 = N/A 8B 3 / 4 = 75% 3 / 4 = 75% 3 / 4 = 75% 2 / 4 = 50% 8C 2 / 3 = 67% 1 / 3 = 33% 1 / 3 = 33% 0 / 3 = 0% Grade 8 SpEd Total 5 / 7 = 72% 4 / 7 = 57% 4 / 7 = 57% 2 / 7 = 29% PTLAMS All Total 17 / 22 = 77% 11 / 22 = 50% 14 / 22 = 64% 7 / 46 = 16% 32

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY California English Language Development Test (CELDT) (2014 2015) Table 3A: PTLAMS Overall Academic Performance CELDT Grades 6 8 PTLAMS CELDT Data (2014-2015) Annual Reclassification Data 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11 total out of 21 5 total out of 11 4 total out of 13 52.38% Reclassified 45.45% Reclassified 30.76% Reclassified 45 Total Annuals Took CELDT (2014 2015) 20 Students Will Be Reclassified Out Of 45 Annual Students Tested 44.44% Total Students Reclassified Initials Data 1 Initial Student in 8th Grade out of 46 Total Students Tested Including Annuals 46 Total CELDT Students (2014 2015) Both Initial and Annual 247 Current School Enrollment 18.62% of Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School Students Participated in CELDT (2014 2015) *This data does not include new students who were tested at other schools. This data reflects students who were tested during the CELDT Initial and Annual Deadlines. 33

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments (2015 2016) Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) Simulation (ELA Part 1 of 2) Table 1A: Academic Performance by Grade Level SBAC Simulation ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ELA Benchmark (1) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D ELA Benchmark (2) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D 34

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments (2015 2016) Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) Simulation (ELA Part 2 of 2) Table 1A: Academic Performance by Grade Level SBAC Simulation ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ELA Benchmark (3) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D ELA Benchmark (4) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D 35

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments (2015 2016) Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) Simulation (Math Part 1 of 2) Table 1B: Academic Performance by Grade Level SBAC Simulation MATHEMATICS Math Benchmark (1) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D Math Benchmark (2) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D 36

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments (2015 2016) Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) Simulation (Math Part 2 of 2) Table 1B: Academic Performance by Grade Level SBAC Simulation MATHEMATICS Math Benchmark (3) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D Math Benchmark (4) Grade / Class / Teacher Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards 6th Grade Total 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade Total 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade Total 8A 8B 8C 8D 37

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments (2015 2016) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 1) Table 2A: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark 1 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade 8A 8B 8C 8D 2015 2016 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 1 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API?????? Regular Ed??? Regular Ed??? Special Ed??? Special Ed??? Total Students??? Total Students??? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued??.?? % growth = API by SBAC 38

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments (2015 2016) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 2) Table 2B: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark 2 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade 8A 8B 8C 8D 2015 2016 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 2 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API?????? Regular Ed??? Regular Ed??? Special Ed??? Special Ed??? Total Students??? Total Students??? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued??.?? % growth = API by SBAC 39

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments (2015 2016) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 3) Table 2C: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark 3 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade 8A 8B 8C 8D 2015 2016 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 3 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API?????? Regular Ed??? Regular Ed??? Special Ed??? Special Ed??? Total Students??? Total Students??? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued??.?? % growth = API by SBAC 40

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments (2015 2016) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (Benchmark 4) Table 2D: Academic Performance by Grade Level API Simulation ELA, Math, & Total API Benchmark 4 ELA Math Total / Bridge 6th Grade 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 7th Grade 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 8th Grade 8A 8B 8C 8D 2015 2016 API BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 4 ELA 6 Reg Math 6 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 6 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 7 Reg Math 7 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 7 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? ELA 8 Reg Math 8 Reg Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non Sp Ed Exceeds Standards??? API Total Non-Sp Ed Meets Standards Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Nearly Meets Standards Has Not Met Standards Has Not Met Standards ELA 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Math 8 Special Ed API Total Sp Ed Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Exceeds Standards Grade 6 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Meets Standards Grade 7 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Nearly Meets Standards Grade 8 API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API??? Has Not Met Standards Total Sp Ed API?????? Regular Ed??? Regular Ed??? Special Ed??? Special Ed??? Total Students??? Total Students??? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with Continued??.?? % growth = API by SBAC 41

??? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with?.??% growth =??? API by SBAC SWD =??? EL =??? LSE =??? (2015 2016) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA All Students PTLAMS ELA All??? Total PTLAMS ELA All % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS ELA All API Total??? (2015 2016) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA SWD Only Students PTLAMS ELA SWD Only??? Total PTLAMS ELA SWD Only % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS ELA SWD Only API Total??? (2015 2016) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA EL Only Students PTLAMS ELA EL Only??? Total PTLAMS ELA EL Only % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS ELA EL Only API Total??? (2015 2016) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard ELA Title 1 (Low SocioEconomic) Students PTLAMS ELA Title 1 Only??? Total PTLAMS ELA Title 1 Only % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS ELA Title 1 Only API Total??? 42

?? Total Current API without CMA Bump Forecast with?.??% growth =??? API by SBAC SWD =??? EL =??? LSE =??? (2015 2016) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math All Students PTLAMS Math All??? Total PTLAMS Math All % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS Math All API Total??? (2015 2016) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math SWD Only Students PTLAMS Math SWD Only??? Total PTLAMS Math SWD Only % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS Math SWD Only API Total??? (2015 2016) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math EL Only Students PTLAMS Math EL Only??? Total PTLAMS Math EL Only % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS ELA Math Only API Total??? (2015 2016) PTLAMS Benchmark 4 Data Dashboard Math Title 1 (Low SocioEconomic) Students PTLAMS Math Title 1 Only??? Total PTLAMS Math Title 1 Only % Exceeds Standards?????.??% Meets Standards?????.??% Nearly Meets Standards?????.??% Has Not Met Standards?????.??% PTLAMS Math Title 1 Only API Total??? 43

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA OVERALL GROWTH Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments (2015 2016) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (All Students) All Class ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F Grade 6 All Total All Class ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E Grade 7 All Total All Class ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 8A 8B 8C 8D Grade 8 All Total PTLAMS All Total 44

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA OVERALL GROWTH Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments (2015 2016) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (EL Students) EL ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F Grade 6 EL Total EL ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E Grade 7 EL Total EL ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 8A 8B 8C 8D Grade 8 EL Total PTLAMS All Total 45

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA OVERALL GROWTH Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Assessments (2015 2016) Academic Performance Index (API) Simulation (SpEd Students) SpEd ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F Grade 6 SpEd Total SpEd ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E Grade 7 SpEd Total SpEd ELA Growth ELA Prof Levels Math Growth Math Prof Levels 8A 8B 8C 8D Grade 8 SpEd Total PTLAMS All Total 46

STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY California English Language Development Test (CELDT) (2015 2016) Table 3A: PTLAMS Overall Academic Performance CELDT Grades 6 8 PTLAMS CELDT Data (2015-2016) Annual Reclassification Data 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade?? total out of???? total out of???? total out of????.??% Reclassified??.??% Reclassified??.??% Reclassified?? Total Annuals Took CELDT (2015 2016)?? Students Will Be Reclassified Out Of?? Annual Students Tested??.??% Total Students Reclassified Initials Data?? Initial Student in 8th Grade out of?? Total Students Tested Including Annuals?? Total CELDT Students (2015 2016) Both Initial and Annual??? Current School Enrollment??.??% of Prepa Tec Los Angeles Middle School Students Participated in CELDT (2015 2016) *This data does not include new students who were tested at other schools. This data reflects students who were tested during the CELDT Initial and Annual Deadlines. 47

SECTION II ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES Analysis of the school s current educational practices and their effectiveness as reflected by the data is included in the Goals and Objectives Section III. All schools are required to develop action plan(s) to address the following Goals in the LEA Plan until they are fully implemented. Documentation of Full Implementation is included in the Single Plan or available at the school site. A. Alignment of English/Language Arts and Mathematics curriculum, instruction, materials, and staff development to content and performance standards; this includes all students having access to the core curriculum and all teachers utilizing the adopted materials, including universal access components, to fidelity. B. All students, including English Language Learners, At- Risk Students (including Socioeconomically Disadvantaged and other student subgroups), Students with Disabilities, and GATE Students achieving Proficiency on content and performance standards. C. Use of pacing guides and benchmark assessments. D. Use of assessment and data to monitor student achievement and the effectiveness of the academic program. E. Effective parental involvement. * All above goals to include professional development in the action plans 48

ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE REQUIRED TITLE I AND PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT SCHOOL ELEMENTS I. All Middle Title I Schools: Strategies for assisting Elementary School Students in the transition to the Middle School Program. In collaboration with the Local Student Development Department administration staff, the following activities are coordinated to assist Elementary Students in a smooth transition to Middle School: Transition day for Elementary School Parents to learn about and tour the school Elementary Students spend time in Middle School classes in late spring Visit local State Elementary Schools and present information about Middle School registration Early Middle School registration (begins during the schools of choice application period) Middle School Parent Information Night Middle School Teachers attend Transition Conference and Collaborate with Elementary Teachers All incoming Middle School Students will be provided with an informational packet when they register for school to boost basic skills. All students and parents are invited to a welcome before school begins to meet with teachers and review Middle School Expectations and Standards. II. All Program Improvement Schools A. Description of implemented corrective action (consultants, DataWorks, etc.) to improve the educational achievement for low- achieving students and to enable the school to make adequate yearly progress (AYP) is addressed in the Goals and Objectives Section III. B. 10 percent of the school s Title I, Part A, allocation is allocated and used to provide high- quality professional development. This requirement is reflected in the School Categorical Funding And Proposed Expenditures Section IV. C. Other Program Improvement School Requirements: an X on the line certifies completion. _X_ The school provides annual written information to parents about the school s Program Improvement status. _X_ The school and LEA provide annual written information to parents about School Choice options. _X_ The school and LEA provide annual information to parents about Supplemental Educational Services. 49

SECTION III Local Control Funding Formula 8 STATE PRIORITIES PRIORITY 1: Basic PRIORITY 2: Implementation of State Standards PRIORITY 7: Course Access PRIORITY 4: Pupil Achievement PRIORITY 8: Other Pupil Outcomes PRIORITY 3: Parental Involvement PRIORITY 5: Pupil Engagement PRIORITY 6: School Climate Category A: Conditions of Learning Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject areas and for the pupils they are teaching; pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials and school facilities are maintained in good repair. Appropriate teacher assignment (e.g. HQT report, SARC)** Sufficient instructional materials (e.g. Board IM Resolution, SARC) Facilities in good repair (e.g. SARC) Implementation of academic content and performance standards adopted by the state board for all pupils. How the programs and services will enable students to access the common core academic content standards How the programs and services will enable English learners to access the common core academic content standards How the programs and services will enable English learners to access the English language development standards Pupil enrollment in a broad course of study that includes all of the subject areas. (e.g. English, Mathematics, Social Science, Science, Visual & Performing Arts, Health, Physical Education, Career & Technical Education, and other.) Category B: Pupil Outcomes Performance on standardized tests, score on Academic Performance Index, share of pupils that are college and career ready, share of English learners that become English proficient, English learner reclassification rate, share of pupils that pass Advanced Placement exams with a 3 or higher, and share of pupils determined prepared for college by the Early Assessment Program. Statewide assessment data (CST Science?, SBAC 2014-15) API (2016-17) College Readiness % of pupils completing A-G or CTE Sequences or ROP or Partnership Academies Language proficiency(celdt, ELPAC 2016-17) English learner reclassification rate % of pupils passing AP exam with score of 3 or higher % of pupils who participate in EAP % of pupils demonstrate college preparedness (EAP) Other (Dibels and/or Lexiles) Other (District Benchmarks) Other (Enrollment in Gate/Honors?) Pupil outcomes in the subject areas. (e.g. English, Mathematics, Social Science, Science, Visual & Performing Arts, Health, Physical Education, Career & Technical Education, and other.) Category C: Engagement Efforts to seek parent input in decision making, promotion of parent participation in programs for unduplicated pupils and special need subgroups. Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for each individual school site How the school district will promote parental participation in programs for: o Economically disadvantaged pupils o English learners o Foster youth o Individuals with exceptional needs School attendance rates, chronic absenteeism rates, middle school dropout rates, high school dropout rates, and high school graduation rates. Pupil suspension rates, pupil expulsion rates, other local measures including surveys of pupils, and parents and teachers on the sense of safety and school connectedness. (e.g. CHKS, PBIS, Locally developed student surveys, Parent Surveys, Teacher Culture Survey) 50

SECTION IV SCHOOL GOALS THIS SECTION CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING: STANDARDS BASED GOALS FOR IMPROVEMENT IN STUDENT PERFORMANCE SCHOOL GOALS FOR ADDRESSING THE DISTRICT LEA PLAN AND STRATEGIC PLAN DIRECTIONS FOR 2016-2017 1. The school site council has analyzed the academic performance of all student groups and has considered the effectiveness of the instructional program for students failing to meet API (Simulation) and CST Benchmark (Simulation) growth targets. As a result, it has adopted the following school goals and action plans, relative to the LEA Plan, and the expenditures to implement the action plans in order to raise the academic performance of all student groups to Proficiency. 2. Professional development actions are addressed in the goals for improvement in student performance rather than addressed as a separate goal. Note: School goals are aligned to the LEA Plan. Action plans are developed to reach Full Implementation of the goals as defined by the CDE s Nine Essential Program Components (EPCs), the Academic Program Surveys, the District Assessment Survey, the English Learner Subgroup Self- Assessment, and the Inventory of Services and Supports for Students with Disabilities. The Action plans should be reachable and reasonable. Ongoing programs, practices, and strategies requiring Categorical funding should be included in the Proposed Expenditures Of Categorical Allocations (Section IV). (Goals and Action Plans Begin Here) School To Parent Communication 1) All School To Parent Communication will be duplicated with RoboCalls. 2) All Robo Calls will be promptly posted on the PTLAMS website (www.prepatec.org). 3) All Communication Avenues will be clearly made aware to All Parents and All Students within the Registration Packet and at the Beginning of the Year All School Meeting with Parents. 4) Purchase Electronic Marquee to be Displayed above the Front Door of the Main Entrance of the School. 5) Implement a RoboText School To Parent type communication. Reading, Writing, and Math Performance Support and Improvement 1) Purchase, Train, and Implement Accelerated Reader & Accelerated Math Online Program connected with ELA & Math Homework Accountability. (http://www.renaissance.com) (Cost / Quote = $14,081.00) 2) Purchase, Train, and Implement Step Up To Writing in ALL Content Areas, ALL Subject Matter Classes. (http://www.soprislearning.com) (Cost / Quote = $11,560.41) Fully Purchased, Trained and Implemented (April 6, 2015) 3) Continue to cultivate / develop Journalism as a Period 8 Academic Elective Course along with Student Council, Yearbook, Coding, Robotics, Reading, Etc. (Students must be Academically Eligible to participate). 4) Establish an ELA Based Social / Political / Charitable / IB Learner Profile Character / Community Building Club. See Mr. King 5) Purchase, Train, and Implement Grammar & English Learner Program / Curriculum. Technology Inclusion Improvement Throughout ALL Content Areas / Subject Matters 1) Inquire from other relative / similar schools about Technology Inclusion and Technology Funding Strategies. 2) Seek Technology Partnerships (Business Partnerships) generated by Parent Involvement. (http://www.apple.com) (http://www.northropgrumman.com) See Ms. Downey 3) Purchase, Train, and Implement 1 to 1 ipads as a Technology Academic Tool. 4) Purchase and Implement 1 Class Set of 30 Computers on a Cart to be shared by only 2 Teachers / Classes as a Technology Academic Tool. 5) 51

THIS SECTION CONTAINS THE BUDGET PAGES: SECTION V SCHOOL CATEGORICAL FUNDING AND PROPOSED EXPENDITURES ESTIMATED CATEGORICAL ALLOCATIONS FOR 2016-2017 YEAR PROPOSED EXPENDITURES OF CATEGORICAL ALLOCATIONS FOR 2016-2017 TO MEET SCHOOL GOALS CATEGORICAL FUNDING ALLOCATED TO THIS SCHOOL The following state and federal categorical funds were allocated to this school through the Consolidated Application, Part II, to enable all students to meet state and local academic performance standards and growth targets. Additional funds (listed under Other ) may be allocated to the school in accordance with district policy and state allocations. Title I and EIA / SCE funds are to be used to to close the achievement gap between high- and low- performing students, especially between minority and non- minority students. (20 USC 6301) Fund and Purpose Federal Funds Title I: School- Wide Program: To improve student achievement and address achievement gap for at- risk students Amount $12,000.00 (SUTW) Title 1: Parent Involvement $6,000.00 Other Federal Funds (list and describe): $3,000.00 Fund and Purpose State Funds Economic Impact Aid/English Language Learner Program (EIA / LEP): To develop fluency in English and academic proficiency of English learners for at- risk students Economic Impact Aid/Student Compensatory Education (EIA / SCE): To improve student achievement and address achievement gap for at- risk students Amount of Allocation $15,000.00 (AR & AM) $15,000.00 Other State Funds (list and describe): $3,000.00 52

PROPOSED SCHOOL CATEGORICAL EXPENDITURES On the Excel sheet provided, list the amounts to be spent on supplemental staff, materials, and equipment to achieve the improvement targets for this school. (Expenditures of categorical funds allocated to the school must be approved by the School Site Council.) (SEE INSERTED EXCEL SHEETS NEXT PAGES) CENTRALIZED SERVICES EXPENDITURES The following Excel sheet, provided by Academic Services / Special Programs, lists the services provided by district staff using categorical funds allocated through the Consolidated Application and by other means. At least 85% of all Consolidated Programs expenditures must be for direct services to students at school sites. (SEE INSERTED EXCEL SHEETS NEXT PAGES) 53

Quote for 6th & 7th Grade (243 students) AR & STAR Only 54

Quote for Grades 6 8 All Students All Programs 55

Step Up To Writing (SUTW) 56

57

Step Up To Writing (SUTW) 58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71