Herbert Hoover Middle

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Engage Educate Empower

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Shelters Elementary School

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Kahului Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Val Verde Unified School District

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Val Verde Unified School District

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

Hokulani Elementary School

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

State Parental Involvement Plan

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

World s Best Workforce Plan

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Executive Summary. Hamilton High School

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Approval Authority: Approval Date: September Support for Children and Young People

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

CDS Code

Geographic Area - Englewood

ASMC PROGRAM REVIEW

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Evaluation of pupil premium grant expenditure 2015/16 Review Date: 16th July 2016

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Long Beach Unified School District

Executive Summary. Osan High School

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

THIS KIT CONTAINS ALL THE INFORMATION YOU NEED

About our academy. Joining our community

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Transcription:

Herbert Hoover Middle California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2015-16 School Year By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians, and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners). Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. Mr. Don McCloskey, Principal Principal, Herbert Hoover Middle About Our School About Our School Hoover Middle School is an exciting place to learn 21st century skills and to get ready for high school. We believe that every student deserves a rich curriculum, the ability to explore electives and grow as a human beings. Additionally, we believe that the work we do is important, that all students can do the work and do it well, and that we won't give up on anyone even if they give up on themselves. We are a Performing and Techniquel Arts schools offering Orchestra, Band, Dance, Art, Mariachi, Ballet Folkloric, Choir, Digital Arts, Video Production, Multimedia, and Drama. We also offer a Two- Way Bilingual Immersion Program so that students can be biliterate and bilingual in Spanish and high school credits can be earned in Algebra and Geometry. R2S3, Respect and Responsibility for Self, School and Society are our behavioral expectations that are explicitly taught to students to ensure a positive school culture. Additionally, we believe that extracurricular activities (clubs, sports, afterschool reward events) are important to our student's school experience and we plan accordingly. Parents/guardians and families are welcome and supported here at Hoover because we recognize the need for creating productive partnerships with our families. The path to college continues here at Hoover and that is why I am proud to be the Principal of Hoover Middle School and would love for you to visit us so we can show you how dedicated we are to providing a wonderful experience for your student. Contact Herbert Hoover Middle 1635 Park Ave. San Jose, CA 95126-2123 Phone: 408-535-6274 E-mail: dmccloskey@sjusd.org

Page 2 of 40

About This School Contact Information (School Year 2016-17) Contact Information (School Year 2016-17) District Contact Information (School Year 2016-17) School Contact Information (School Year 2016-17) District Name San Jose Unified School Name Herbert Hoover Middle Phone Number (408) 535-6090 Street 1635 Park Ave. Superintendent Nancy Albarrán City, State, Zip San Jose, Ca, 95126-2123 E-mail Address nalbarran@sjusd.org Phone Number 408-535-6274 Web Site http://www.sjusd.org Principal Mr. Don McCloskey, Principal E-mail Address dmccloskey@sjusd.org Web Site http://www.sjusd.org/hoover/ County-District- 43696666062111 School (CDS) Code School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2016-17) School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2016-17) Principal s Comments I am proud to be the Principal of Hoover Middle School where a diverse and well trained staff offers a well-rounded curriculum and choice of electives, which includes a full Drama, Band, Orchestra, Dance and Choir programs. We have high school classes (Algebra and Geometry and a Two Way Bilingual Program which is designed to have students become biliterate and bilingual in Spanish and English. At Hoover we believe the work we do is important, that every student can do the work and do it well, and that we will not give up on anyone even when they give up on themselves. I welcome parent participation at Hoover and encourage you to join us in building the best middle school in the State. Mission Statement All Hoover Middle School students are inspired and prepared to succeed in a global society. Vision Hoover Middle School's mission is to eliminate the opportunity gap and provide every student with the finest 21st century education while maximizing each student's individual potential. Principal s Experience Don McCloskey is the Principal at Hoover for the 2015/16 school year. This is his third year at Hoover after spending 6 years as the Director of Student Services for San Jose Unified School District. Before attaining District level experience, Don was the Principal of Bret Harte Middle School, which is also located in the San Jose Unified School District. Serving his entire career in San Jose Unified he has also been a teacher, coach, and an Assistant Principal. Major Achievements Hoover Middle School is committed to improving the academic achievement of their students by having the best teaching staff. We sent teachers to Math conferences, classroom management training, the National Social Studies conference, the National Science conference, participated in numerous collaboration days and Common Core, Explicit Direct Instruction, Achieve3000, DreamBox, MindsetWorks and Responsibility Centered Discipline training. Page 3 of 40

Hoover Middle School s implementation of Positive Behavior Intervention Support was given a high mark for success and will move to the next phase of implementation by creating Tier II and Tier III behavioral interventions. The data shows a marked decrease in problem behaviors, an increase in positive school climate, and a steady rise in student achievement. Increased student participation in before and after school activities with open gym and open computer lab in the mornings and at lunch, all which contributes to an increase in student involvement. Hoover provides additional academic and social/emotional support through the Breakthrough Program, a grade boost program (After School Fitness Center) and an after school homework center. Opportunities for Parent Involvement Hoover's PTSA sponsors a variety of activities involving parents and students throughout the school year, including: emergency supplies, field trips, and classroom materials. They also provide additional funding for instrumental music, vocal music, and drama programs. PTSA brings in additional funds per year to the school. Monthly open meetings for parents are held in our Media Center with translation available in Spanish. Hoover also has a Performing Arts Booster club which directly supports our Drama, Orchestra, Band, Choir and Dance programs. They meet monthly to plan fund raising opportunities, organize and support performances. Hoover has a Site English Language Advisory Council (SELAC) that holds open, monthly meetings, to discuss school programs, as well as parent and student opportunities. Hoover parents represent the school at the District level meetings (DELAC) on a monthly basis. Hoover s School Site Council has monthly meetings to discuss student data and need, approve spending, and make decisions about improving the school. For further information on our parent volunteer program, please contact our Parent/Community Liaison at 408-535-6274 Ext. 53619 School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements Hoover is a large campus with two main buildings. The original building, referred to as Historic Hoover, opened in 1931 and served students until 1971. This building was retrofitted for earthquake safety and was reopened for classroom use in 1999. The other main building is 30+ years old. A crew of four custodians cleans the buildings daily. A grounds man working two days per week maintains the landscaping. Hoover Middle School prides itself on the cleanliness of its campus. Maintenance of the grounds and campus buildings is a high priority. Beginning in January 1997, Hoover Middle School started a major modernization program with the final improvements complete in the summer of 2006. This project, funded by a bond initiative (Measure C), included new air-conditioning, heaters, roofing, flooring, paint, new staff room, and upgraded electrical systems. Replacement of the roof on Historic Hoover took place in the summer of 2009. Hoover will be undergoing a number of facility changes this year. Our continuing efforts to have beautiful campus continued with a number of murals being painted. We added classrooms in the old community center to expand our programs. This will allow for more interaction and activities in the media center while maintaining classroom integrity. Also, we are going to explore adding additional science lab equipment to our current science classrooms. School Safety Plan Most Recent Year Safety Date safety plan updated: August 2015 Date safety plan Last reviewed with staff: April 2015 Hoover s Safe School Plan is reviewed and updated annually by a school safety committee and approved by the entire staff. The key elements of the plan are: actions of school personnel during various emergency situations such as earthquakes or fire and is built on the personal characteristics of students and staff, the school s physical environment, leadership and school culture. At Hoover Middle School, our mission is to help all students discover, develop, and enjoy their unique talents; to encourage them to reach their goals; to create an intellectual curiosity and a love for learning; and most of all, to teach them to be kind, considerate human beings. Through a proactive administration and staff that provides a quick response to all students needs, Hoover Middle School offers a safe and caring environment that enriches students education through the consistent application of rules, consequences, and positive recognition. Page 4 of 40

Hoover implements Positive Behavior Intervention and Support (PBIS) to teach common language around expectations for student behavior. These behavior expectations are referred to as R2S3 (Respect and Responsibility for Self, School and Society). Students receive recognition for respectful and responsible behavior in classrooms, the hallways, the quad, at performances, etc. Four administrators, three full time campus supervisors provide physical supervision of the campus, before, during and after the school day. School uniforms allow supervising adults to identify non-student body visitors at a glance. All visitors to the campus are required to sign-in at the office and wear a visitor s sticker as evidence of having a legitimate purpose to be on campus. In accordance with District guidelines, the Hoover staff has developed a Disaster/Emergency Preparedness plan. Students and staff participate in monthly emergency evacuation drills. Students receive safety instruction as needed. Two-way communication in all classrooms and hand-held walkie-talkies for our administrators, campus assistants, and office support help keep our school safe. Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2014-15) GATE Per San Jose Unified School District guidelines for middle schools, all students are assigned to heterogeneous classes. GATE students' academic achievement is part of the responsibility of all classroom teachers in the core subjects. Rigor and high expectations for reaching academic standards at high levels are the basis for all teaching endeavors. Projects and project-based learning offer vehicles that promote differentiated instruction for all students. Hoover prefers to approach the gifted learner in a whole-school manner, by offering a Variety of elective classes. Ongoing teacher training on research-based practices and differentiated instruction help prepare our teachers to meet a wide range of student needs. SPECIAL ED Needs of Special Education students are met, based on IEP goals, by credentialed special education teachers, instructional associates and regular education teachers as appropriate. AT RISK STUDENTS At-risk students are identified through grade level meetings, the COST process, and SSTs. Academic supports are available through the Homework Center, 7th period grade boost classes, intervention classes in Math and ELA, teacher tutorials, and specific programs for categorically funded students. Grade level advisers, administrators, academic counselors and teachers monitor these students. ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Hoover Middle School provides ELD classes for grade level and core subject areas. All students who have a home language other than English are assessed and those identified as Limited English Proficient are placed in the appropriate educational setting with highly qualified teachers. STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Students with disabilities are served through the special education program. Special Education students are served in regular education classes or in specific small group settings. Each student has a case manager that oversees the student s progress and communicates with parents and other staff members about the student. AFTER-SCHOOL PROGRAMS After-school programs are numerous at Hoover. For 2014-15, Hoover and Think Together offers a 3 hour/day, 5 days a week comprehensive after school academic and enrichment program. This program offers over an hour of academic tutoring, which ties into a two-hour enrichment program. We also provide Academic Enrichment classes to include cooking, dancing, art, RC car building, music, fitness training, and athletics. The Homework Center and teacher tutorials take place almost daily. Sports programs, Folkloric Dance, and VPA classes regularly schedule practices and performances. TUTORING The Breakthrough Program offers tutoring to students enrolled in its program. Classroom teachers are available before and after school as needed. INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Page 5 of 40

Hoover Middle School staff members participate in ongoing staff development both on and off campus. Teachers receive staff development in diversity, differentiated instruction, site-specific data analysis, strategies for reading in the content areas, Explicit Direct Instruction, Common Core, Positive Behavior Intervention and Support and Responsibility Centered Discipline. All staff development incorporates school wide issues and specific classroom strategies, which can be implemented to support student achievement. The staff is recognized for embracing curricular innovations and research-based strategies and programs that address students' diverse learning styles and special talents. New teachers have regular meetings with mentor teachers, BTSA and PAR coaches, and administrators who provide information and training as needed. Hoover has part time Math and Language Arts resource teachers who also assist beginning teachers. New teachers are provided with release time to pursue ongoing professional development support and to observe the classrooms of more experienced teachers. All teachers are provided with release time as needed/requested. Professional development is provided through a variety of means. Three professional development days are built into the school calendar. In addition, regular after school sessions are scheduled, release days for curricular areas teams are provided, and on-site coaching is available. Teachers can also attend off site conferences and workshops. Opportunities for professional development are also offered by the SJUSD, during the day, after school and on weekends. Teachers are supported through on site resource teachers in LA, Math, science, and ELD/SDAIE coaches using an in-class coaching model. Administrators support teachers through the evaluation process. Support for student performance data analysis and reporting is conducted in curricular area meetings, during school wide staff development days and at staff meetings. Note for Section: IV. Accountability, Table: Federal Intervention Program Information in this table applies only to schools receiving Title I funding. This school does not receive Title I funding, and therefore this table does not apply. Last updated: 1/11/2017 Page 6 of 40

Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2015-16) Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2015-16) Grade Level Number of Students Grade 6 360 Grade 7 355 Grade 8 354 Total Enrollment 1069 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2015-16) Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2015-16) Student Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American 2.6 % American Indian or Alaska Native 0.7 % Asian 4.2 % Filipino 1.1 % Hispanic or Latino 79.0 % Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.6 % White 10.1 % Two or More Races 0.6 % Other 1.1 % Student Group (Other) Percent of Total Enrollment Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 72.0 % English Learners 27.5 % Students with Disabilities 10.3 % Foster Youth 0.5 % Page 7 of 40

A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair Teacher Credentials Teacher Credentials Teachers School District 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2016-17 With Full Credential 46 46 52 1460 Without Full Credential 2 4 4 35 Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 2 3 3 23 60 50 40 30 Teachers with Full Credential Teachers without Full Credential Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 20 10 0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Last updated: 1/10/2017 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Indicator Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 0 0 0 4.5 4.0 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments Vacant Teacher Positions Total Teacher Misassignments* 0 0 0 Vacant Teacher Positions 4 2 0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English learners. Last updated: 1/10/2017 Page 8 of 40

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2015-16) Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2015-16) Location of Classes Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 65.0% 35.0% All Schools in District 87.0% 13.0% High-Poverty Schools in District Low-Poverty Schools in District 84.0% 16.0% 89.0% 11.0% Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Lowpoverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2016-17) Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2016-17) Year and month in which data were collected: September 2016 Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/year of Adoption From Most Recent Adoption? Percent Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy Reading/Language Arts Materials List: https://sjusd.box.com/v/curriculum2016-2017 Yes 0.0 % Mathematics - Yes 0.0 % Science - Yes 0.0 % History-Social Science - Yes 0.0 % Foreign Language - Yes 0.0 % Health - Yes 0.0 % Visual and Performing Arts - Yes 0.0 % Science Lab Eqpmt (Grades 9-12) Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. N/A N/A 0.0 % Last updated: 12/5/2016 Page 9 of 40

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements Hoover is a large campus with two main buildings. The original building, referred to as Historic Hoover, opened in 1931 and served students until 1971. This building was retrofitted for earthquake safety and was reopened for classroom use in 1999. The other main building is 30+ years old. A crew of four custodians cleans the buildings daily. A grounds man working two days per week maintains the landscaping. Hoover Middle School prides itself on the cleanliness of its campus. Maintenance of the grounds and campus buildings is a high priority. Beginning in January 1997, Hoover Middle School started a major modernization program with the final improvements complete in the summer of 2006. This project, funded by a bond initiative (Measure C), included new airconditioning, heaters, roofing, flooring, paint, new staff room, and upgraded electrical systems. Replacement of the roof on Historic Hoover took place in the summer of 2009. Hoover will be undergoing a number of facility changes this year. We continue to try and add benches to the quad area for student use during brunch and lunch. Additionally, murals will be painted on various outside walls for campus beautification. The goal of the school is to enclose the interior classrooms that border the media center. This will allow for more interaction and activities in the media center while maintaining classroom integrity. Also, we are going to explore adding additional science lab equipment to our current science classrooms. School Facility Good Repair Status Year and month of the most recent FIT report: July 2016 Last updated: 1/11/2017 System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Rating Good Poor Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned Several areas need paint. Several ceiling tiles need to be replaced due to water damage. Holes in wall in several rooms need to be patched/repaired. Wall paper peeling in several classrooms and need to be reglued or repaired. Carpet areas need to be repaired from seam. Baseboard needs to be reglued in several rooms. Work order #252372, 252376, 252374, 252375, 252373, 252376 placed with Maintenance Dept for painting and carpentry work. Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/Fountains Good Good Fair Broken faucet handle in staff restroom. Several drinking fountains have too much water pressure and need to be adjusted. Loose toilet seats found in several restrooms. Custodian was made aware of toilet seats that need to be tightened. work order # 252371 placed with Maintenance for plumbers to fix issues. Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs Good Good External: Playground/School Good Page 10 of 40

Grounds, Windows/Doors/Gates/Fences Overall Facility Rate Year and month of the most recent FIT report: July 2016 Overall Rating Good Last updated: 12/9/2016 Page 11 of 40

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for students in the general education population and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] and mathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. The CAAs have replaced the California Alternate Performance Assessment [CAPA] for ELA and mathematics, which were eliminated in 2015. Only eligible students may participate in the administration of the CAAs. CAA items are aligned with alternate achievement standards, which are linked with the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students with significant cognitive disabilities); and The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. CAASPP Test Results in English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA) and Mathematics for All Students CAASPP Test Results in English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA) and Mathematics for All Students Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards School District State Subject 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 English Language Arts / Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) 29.0% 33.0% 51.0% 54.0% 44.0% 48.0% Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11) 21.0% 23.0% 39.0% 42.0% 34.0% 36.0% Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Page 12 of 40

CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2015-16) Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2015-16) ELA - Grade 3 ELA - Grade 3 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 13 of 40

ELA - Grade 4 ELA - Grade 4 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 14 of 40

ELA - Grade 5 ELA - Grade 5 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 15 of 40

ELA- Grade 6 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 358 346 96.7% 36.7% Male 161 156 96.9% 29.5% Female 197 190 96.5% 42.6% Black or African American 12 12 100.0% 58.3% American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian 15 15 100.0% 80.0% Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 274 266 97.1% 27.8% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White 42 40 95.2% 67.5% Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 267 257 96.3% 26.5% English Learners 95 94 99.0% 2.1% Students with Disabilities 31 29 93.6% -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 16 of 40

ELA - Grade 7 ELA - Grade 7 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 356 346 97.2% 31.3% Male 181 179 98.9% 22.9% Female 175 167 95.4% 40.4% Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian 12 11 91.7% 81.8% Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 284 276 97.2% 24.4% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White 38 37 97.4% 62.2% Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 274 266 97.1% 23.0% English Learners 99 95 96.0% 6.4% Students with Disabilities 43 42 97.7% -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 17 of 40

ELA - Grade 8 ELA - Grade 8 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 356 348 97.8% 30.8% Male 159 157 98.7% 23.6% Female 197 191 97.0% 36.7% Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian 18 18 100.0% 66.7% Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 287 281 97.9% 23.5% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White 25 23 92.0% 69.6% Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 278 274 98.6% 24.8% English Learners 91 90 98.9% 5.6% Students with Disabilities 29 29 100.0% -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 18 of 40

ELA - Grade 11 ELA - Grade 11 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 19 of 40

CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2015-16) Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2015-16) Mathematics - Grade 3 Mathematics - Grade 3 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 20 of 40

Mathematics - Grade 4 Mathematics - Grade 4 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 21 of 40

Mathematics - Grade 5 Mathematics - Grade 5 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 22 of 40

Mathematics - Grade 6 Mathematics - Grade 6 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 358 350 97.8% 24.6% Male 161 158 98.1% 26.6% Female 197 192 97.5% 22.9% Black or African American 12 12 100.0% 41.7% American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian 15 15 100.0% 66.7% Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 274 268 97.8% 16.8% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White 42 40 95.2% 50.0% Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 267 261 97.8% 15.3% English Learners 95 95 100.0% 6.3% Students with Disabilities 31 29 93.6% 3.5% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 23 of 40

Mathematics - Grade 7 Mathematics - Grade 7 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 356 349 98.0% 23.8% Male 181 181 100.0% 22.1% Female 175 168 96.0% 25.6% Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian 12 12 100.0% 75.0% Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 284 278 97.9% 17.3% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White 38 37 97.4% 54.1% Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 274 268 97.8% 14.2% English Learners 99 97 98.0% 4.1% Students with Disabilities 43 41 95.4% -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 24 of 40

Mathematics - Grade 8 Mathematics - Grade 8 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 356 350 98.3% 20.6% Male 159 157 98.7% 16.6% Female 197 193 98.0% 23.8% Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian 18 18 100.0% 50.0% Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 287 283 98.6% 15.2% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White 25 23 92.0% 43.5% Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 278 275 98.9% 16.7% English Learners 91 91 100.0% 4.4% Students with Disabilities 29 29 100.0% -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 25 of 40

Mathematics - Grade 11 Mathematics - Grade 11 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 26 of 40

CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced School District State Subject 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 52.0% 46.0% 49.0% 61.0% 57.0% 55.0% 60.0% 56.0% 54.0% Note: Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) in grades five, eight, and ten. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. CAASPP Tests Results in Science by Student Group Grades Five, Eight and Grade Ten (School Year 2015-16) Student Group Total Enrollment Number of Students with Valid Scores Percent of Students with Valid Scores Percent Proficient or Advanced All Students 356 341 95.8% 48.7% Male 159 153 96.2% 49.0% Female 197 188 95.4% 48.4% Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian 18 18 100.0% 77.8% Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 287 275 95.8% 41.5% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White 25 22 88.0% 86.4% Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 278 267 96.0% 43.8% English Learners 91 86 94.5% 19.8% Students with Disabilities 29 23 79.3% 13.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Science test results include CSTs, CMA, and CAPA in grades five, eight, and ten. The Proficient or Advanced is calculated by taking the total number of students who scored at Proficient or Advanced on the science assessment divided by the total number of students with valid scores. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Page 27 of 40

Career Technical Education Programs (School Year 2015-16) Career Technical Education Programs (School Year 2015-16) N/A Last updated: 12/5/2016 Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2015-16) Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2015-16) Measure CTE Program Participation Number of Pupils Participating in CTE 0 Percent of Pupils Completing a CTE Program and Earning a High School Diploma 0.0% Percent of CTE Courses Sequenced or Articulated Between the School and Institutions of Postsecondary Education 0.0% Courses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) Admission Courses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) Admission Last updated: 12/5/2016 UC/CSU Course Measure Percent 2015-16 Pupils Enrolled in Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission -- 2014-15 Graduates Who Completed All Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 0.0% Page 28 of 40

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8): Pupil outcomes in the subject area of physical education California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2015-16) California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2015-16) Percentage of Students Meeting Fitness Standards Grade Level Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards 7 22.6% 20.0% 23.5% Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Last updated: 8/18/2017 Page 29 of 40

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2016-17) Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2016-17) Hoover's PTSA sponsors a variety of activities involving parents and students throughout the school year, including: emergency supplies, field trips, and classroom materials. They also provide additional funding for instrumental music, vocal music, and drama programs. PTSA brings in additional funds per year to the school. Monthly open meetings for parents are held in our Parent Media Center with translation available in Spanish. Hoover has a Visual and Performing Arts booster club which supports our Drama, Band, Orchestra, Dance and Choir program. Parents are involved in providing ticket sales, programs, promotion and various other activities. Hoover has a Site English Language Advisory Council (SELAC) that holds open, monthly meetings, to discuss school programs, as well as parent and student opportunities. Hoover parents represent the school at the District level meetings (DELAC) on a monthly basis. For further information on our parent volunteer program, please contact our Parent/Community Liaison at 408-535-6274 Ext. 53619 State Priority: Pupil Engagement Last updated: 1/11/2017 The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Engagement (Priority 5): High school dropout rates; and High school graduation rates Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) School District State Indicator 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Dropout Rate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.4% 11.5% 10.7% Graduation Rate 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.44 80.95 82.27 Dropout/Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Chart 1.0 Dropout Rate Graduation Rate 0.5 0.0-0.5-1.0 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Page 30 of 40

Page 31 of 40

Completion of High School Graduation Requirements - Graduating Class of 2015 Completion of High School Graduation Requirements - Graduating Class of 2015 (One-Year Rate) (One-Year Rate) Student Group School District State All Students -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- White -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- Page 32 of 40

State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety Suspensions and Expulsions Suspensions and Expulsions School District State Rate 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Suspensions 9.1 8.7 7.2 4.4 3.5 3.7 4.4 3.8 3.7 Expulsions 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Suspensions Expulsions 10 School Suspensions District Suspensions State Suspensions 0.45 0.40 School Expulsions District Expulsions State Expulsions 8 0.35 0.30 6 0.25 4 0.20 0.15 2 0.10 0.05 0 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 0.00 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 School Safety Plan (School Year 2016-17) Date safety plan updated: August 2015 Date safety plan last reviewed with staff: October 2015 and January 2016 Hoover s Safe School Plan is reviewed and updated annually by a staff team. The key elements of the plan are: personal characteristics of students and staff, the school s physical environment, leadership and organizational process and the school s culture. At Hoover Middle School, our mission is to help all students discover, develop, and enjoy their unique talents; to encourage them to reach their goals; to create an intellectual curiosity and a love for learning; and most of all, to teach them to be kind, considerate human beings. Through a proactive administration and staff that provides a quick response to all students needs, Hoover Middle School offers a safe and caring environment that enriches students education through the consistent application of rules, consequences, and positive recognition. Hoover began implementation of Positive Behavior Intervention and Support (PBIS) to teach common language around and expectations for student behavior. These behavior expectations are referred to as R2S3 (Respect and Responsibility for Self, School and Society). Students receive recognition for respectful and responsible behavior in classrooms, the hallways, the quad, at performances, etc. Four administrators, three full time campus supervisors and before and after school bus monitors provide physical supervision of the campus, before, during and after the school day. School uniforms allow supervising adults to identify non-student body visitors at a glance. All visitors to the campus are required to sign-in at the office and wear a visitor s sticker as evidence of having a legitimate purpose to be on campus. Page 33 of 40

In accordance with District guidelines, the Hoover staff has developed a Disaster/Emergency Preparedness plan. Students and staff participate in monthly emergency evacuation drills. Students receive safety instruction as needed. Two-way communication in all classrooms and hand-held walkie-talkies for our administrators, campus assistants, and officers help keep our school safe. Last updated: 1/11/2017 Page 34 of 40

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2016-17) Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2016-17) Indicator School District Program Improvement Status In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2009-2010 Year in Program Improvement Year 3 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 17 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 94.4% Note: Cells with NA values do not require data. Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Grade Level Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ K 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 1 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 2 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 3 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 4 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 5 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 6 22.7 36 43 18 22.5 37 46 14 22.3 36 49 15 Other 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 * Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class). Last updated: 1/25/2017 Page 35 of 40

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Subject Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ English 30.0 7 19 16 27.0 6 22 12 28.0 10 27 8 Mathematics 29.0 7 19 15 27.0 12 21 11 27.0 12 30 4 Science 32.0 0 17 13 30.0 1 19 9 29.0 1 26 1 Social Science 31.0 2 20 14 28.0 4 28 6 28.0 3 29 5 * Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level. Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2015-16) Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor Academic Counselor 1.8 594.0 Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) 2.1 N/A Library Media Teacher (librarian) 0.0 N/A Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) 0.8 N/A Psychologist 0.5 N/A Social Worker 0.0 N/A Nurse 0.5 N/A Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 1.2 N/A Resource Specialist (non-teaching) 0.7 N/A Other 0.2 N/A Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. *One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15) Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15) Last updated: 1/11/2017 Level Total Expenditures Per Pupil Expenditures Per Pupil (Supplemental/Restricted) Expenditures Per Pupil (Basic/Unrestricted) Average Teacher Salary School Site $10397.0 $2567.0 $7831.0 $67932.0 District N/A N/A $11261.0 $70979.0 Percent Difference School Site and District -- -- -8.4% -1.3% State N/A N/A $5677.0 $75837.0 Percent Difference School Site and State -- -- 37.9% -12.0% Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Last updated: 1/6/2017 Page 36 of 40

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2015-16) GATE Per San Jose Unified School District guidelines for middle schools, all students are assigned to heterogeneous classes. GATE students' academic achievement is part of the responsibility of all classroom teachers in the core subjects. Rigor and high expectations for reaching academic standards at high levels are the basis for all teaching endeavors. Projects and project-based learning offer vehicles that promote differentiated instruction for all students. Hoover prefers to approach the gifted learner in a whole-school manner, by offering a variety of elective classes. Ongoing teacher training on research-based practices and differentiated instruction help prepare our teachers to meet a wide range of student needs. Special Ed Needs of Special Education students are met, based on IEP goals, by credentialed special education teachers, instructional associates and regular education teachers as appropriate. At-Risk Students At-risk students are identified through grade level meetings, the COST process and Tier II meetings. Academic supports are available through the Academic Fitness Program, intervention classes in Math and ELA, teacher tutorials, and specific programs for categorically funded students. Grade level administrators and teachers monitor these students. English Language Learners Hoover Middle School provides ELD classes at every grade level and core subject areas. All students who have a home language other than English are assessed and those identified as Limited English Proficient are placed in the appropriate educational setting with highly qualified teachers. Students with Disabilities Students with disabilities are served through the special education program. Students are served in either a RSP or SDC setting. Each student has a case manager that oversees the student s progress and communicates with parents and other staff members about the student. After-School Programs After-school programs are numerous at Hoover. For 2015-16, Hoover and Think Together offered a 3 hour/day, 5 days a week comprehensive after school academic and enrichment program. This program offers over an hour of academic tutoring, which ties into a two-hour enrichment program. Hoover's After Class Enrichment program offers classes to include cooking, dancing, art, RC car building, music, fitness training, and athletics. The Academic Fitness program and teacher tutorials take place almost daily and offer instruction in Language Arts and Mathematics. Sports programs, and Visual Peforming Arts classes regularly schedule practices and performances. Tutoring The Breakthrough Program offers tutoring to students enrolled in its program. Classroom teachers are available before and after school as needed. Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15) Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15) Last updated: 1/12/2017 Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $51,804 $45,092 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $75,277 $71,627 Highest Teacher Salary $90,927 $93,288 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $107,108 $115,631 Average Principal Salary (Middle) $113,822 $120,915 Page 37 of 40

Average Principal Salary (High) $124,980 $132,029 Superintendent Salary $243,000 $249,537 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 35.0% 37.0% Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5.0% 5.0% For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Teacher Salary Chart Principal Salary Chart 100000 140000 80000 120000 100000 60000 80000 40000 60000 40000 20000 20000 0 Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary 0 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) Average Principal Salary (Middle) Average Principal Salary (High) Page 38 of 40