SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Similar documents
Academic Affairs Policy #1

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

University of Toronto

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Conflicts of Interest and Commitment (Excluding Financial Conflict of Interest Related to Research)

College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

SORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS POLICY ON EXPANSION FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES

Assessment and Evaluation for Student Performance Improvement. I. Evaluation of Instructional Programs for Performance Improvement

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

Orientation Workshop on Outcome Based Accreditation. May 21st, 2016

University of New Hampshire Policies and Procedures for Student Evaluation of Teaching (2016) Academic Affairs Thompson Hall

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

PROGRAM HANDBOOK. for the ACCREDITATION OF INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION LABORATORIES. by the HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Programme Specification

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

IRB-FLINT Standard Operating Procedures May Institutional Review Board (IRB-FLINT) Standard Operating Procedures. May 2012

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

Residential Admissions Procedure Manual

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

K-12 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -

NSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

AFFILIATION AGREEMENT

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

CAUL Principles and Guidelines for Library Services to Onshore Students at Remote Campuses to Support Teaching and Learning

Report of External Evaluation and Review

Educational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT

SORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS FLORIDA GREEK STANDARDS ACCREDITATION PROGRAM FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

Academic Program Assessment Prior to Implementation (Policy and Procedures)

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

Communication Guide Office of Marketing & Communication Last Updated March 10, 2017

CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

The University of Tennessee at Martin. Coffey Outstanding Teacher Award and Cunningham Outstanding Teacher / Scholar Award

Faculty Voice Task Force 5: Fixed Term Faculty. November 1, 2006

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Article 15 TENURE. A. Definition

Background Checks and Pennsylvania Act 153 of 2014 Compliance. Frequently Asked Questions

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning

PUBLIC SPEAKING, DISTRIBUTION OF LITERATURE, COMMERCIAL SOLICITATION AND DEMONSTRATIONS IN PUBLIC AREAS

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

FY16 UW-Parkside Institutional IT Plan Report

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

NEW PROGRAM PROPOSAL [PROGRAM] [DATE]

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

GRADUATE COLLEGE Dual-Listed Courses

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

I. STATEMENTS OF POLICY

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

CARDIFF UNIVERSITY OF WALES UNITED KINGDOM. Christine Daniels 1. CONTEXT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALES AND OTHER SYSTEMS

Program Change Proposal:

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

Friday, October 3, 2014 by 10: a.m. EST

Legal Technicians: A Limited License to Practice Law Ellen Reed, King County Bar Association, Seattle, WA

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Bilingual Staffing Guidelines

ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY

Assessment of Generic Skills. Discussion Paper

Tun your everyday simulation activity into research

CHAPTER XXIV JAMES MADISON MEMORIAL FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Transcription:

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY Volume : APP/IP Chapter : R1 Responsible Executive: Provost and Executive Vice President Responsible Office: Institutional and Community Engagement, Institutional Effectiveness Date Issued: August 1, 2014 Date Last Revised: August 1, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY... 1 STATEMENT OF POLICY... 1 REASON FOR THIS POLICY... 1 INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES AFFECTED BY THIS POLICY... 2 WHO SHOULD KNOW THIS POLICY... 2 EXCLUSIONS... 2 WEBSITE ADDRESS FOR THIS POLICY... 3 CONTACTS... 3 DEFINITIONS... 3 RESPONSIBILITIES... 3 PROCEDURES... 4 RELATED DOCUMENTS, FORMS AND TOOLS... 5 HISTORY AND UPDATES... 5 APPENDIX... 5 STATEMENT OF POLICY The application of research and administrative surveys which involve a broad sampling or census of a population at Nova Southeastern University (including, but not limited to applicants, alumni, students, faculty, and staff) requires prior approval in writing by the appropriate Responsible Executive as identified by this policy. REASON FOR THIS POLICY Nova Southeastern University is committed to ensuring meaningful and reliable results from mission-critical administrative surveys. These surveys of faculty, staff, administration, students and alumni are essential for NSU to make informed decisions regarding its programs, policies, procedures and practices to ensure its ongoing accreditation. To secure maximum participation in these crucial information gathering efforts, the university endeavors not to over-saturate these important constituent groups with numerous requests for participation in surveys and other similar data gathering activities. Given the increasing profile and importance of survey results,

it is imperative that results be meaningful and reliable and that actions are coordinated in order to maximize response rates. With the increasing number of surveys administered, survey fatigue has become a serious concern; thus, survey coordination is critical. This policy also recognizes the importance of research surveys and includes considerations for research. As a result, the goal of this policy is to maximize the benefits of administrative and research surveys and to ensure that a coordinated approach is taken at NSU by: 2 Avoiding the collection of duplicate information; Reducing possible survey fatigue by limiting the number and timing of surveys to any one specific group; Maximizing the participation rates for critical university administrative surveys; Ensuring those who undertake survey research are aware of FERPA issues as well as other ethical issues; Ensuring that longitudinal trends in opinions can be tracked; Ensuring that institution-wide expertise concerning surveys are identified and drawn upon at all stages of the process; Encouraging the communication and sharing of survey results with the campus community; Support research surveys in a coordinated manner to assure quality and accuracy. INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES AFFECTED BY THIS POLICY This policy applies to all administrative and research surveys which involve a broad sampling or census of a population at Nova Southeastern University (including, but not limited to applicants, alumni, students, faculty, and staff). If there is any uncertainty as to whether or not a prospective survey falls under this policy, Institutional Effectiveness (IE) should be contacted for guidance. WHO SHOULD KNOW THIS POLICY Administration Academic Affairs Academic Centers Institutional Effectiveness Research and Technology Transfer Students Faculty EXCLUSIONS This policy does not apply to: a) Surveys that involve small, specific sampling, including academic-unit specific surveys*;

3 b) Evaluation of an event by participants or feedback from clients at the point of service; c) Surveys required by a specific academic unit for professional accreditation requirements*; d) Teaching evaluation forms. *These surveys fall under the purview of the unit-specific Responsible Executive (e.g. dean). For academic units, each dean shall design an appropriate review process and shall assume the role of Responsible Executive in the final approval or denial process and decision. WEBSITE ADDRESS FOR THIS POLICY [Executive Policy Review Group will complete.] CONTACTS Subject Contact Telephone E-mail/Web Address Policy Clarification Executive Director of Institutional and Community Engagement 954-262- 5398 http://www.nova.edu/ie/ice/community/index.html DEFINITIONS FERPA The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 U.S.C. 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99) is a Federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. The law applies to all schools that receive funds under an applicable program of the U.S. Department of Education. Survey A method for collecting quantitative information about items in a population Responsible Executive The Administrator, Dean, or Director in charge of a particular area. RESPONSIBILITIES NSU s Research Survey Policy includes provision for a review of proposals in which the investigator seeks systematically to gather data from NSU constituents, as indicated above. The oversight of the review process will be the responsibility of a Survey Research Committee which will include: Vice President of Institutional Effectiveness (IE) or IE designee,

One dean, One institutional researcher or statistician, Three faculty members representing diverse academic units, and One Institutional Review Board (IRB) representative. The committee s mandate is to: Receive and consider applications for permission to survey; Meet once monthly if there are proposals to review; Respond to petitioners within 30 days; Ensure good survey methodology and design; Maintain an account of the level of surveying imposed on the different constituencies on campus; Assess the effectiveness of approved surveys, once completed; Report annually to the Provost on survey activity. Exempted Surveys: The following University Surveys are considered to be exempted from the approval process: IE s Annual Student Survey (conducted in October, annually), IE s Annual Alumni Survey (conducted in March, annually), IE s Bi-annual Employee Survey (conducted in January, biannually), IE s Annual Community Affiliate Survey (conducted in July, annually), NSSE (conducted in winter semester, every third year), and Student Affairs Educational Benchmarking Inventory (conducted in February, annually). PROCEDURES Any person or persons (e.g. NSU employees, faculty, students, staff) wishing to conduct a survey, or having responsibility for managing part of an external survey using NSU employees, students, or alumni as participants, shall make an application to the NSU Research Survey Committee for permission to proceed. The application (less than three pages) will identify: 1. The desired population to be surveyed; 2. The intended method of survey design, administration and data analysis, 3. Rationale for sample size; 4. The proposed date(s) on which the survey will be administered and any pre- or postmailings encouraging survey participation; 5. A description of any planned incentive program for respondents; 6. The purpose of the survey and how the information will be used; 7. The strategic or research context of the survey; 8. How the data will be stored; 4

9. How the results will be communicated. The committee will consider, among other things, 1. Alignment with NSU s strategic plan and priorities including research and scholarship. 2. Design of the survey including timing, scope and mode of delivery. 3. Extent to which other surveys supply (or could supply) the required data. 4. Extent of survey burden on target groups with the University. 5. Government requirements. 6. Accreditation requirements. 7. Impact of survey and any previous surveys of this kind. The committee is to be advisory to the Provost. The Provost will have final approval authority and responsibility. The Committee will review all submissions, make recommendations and provide rationale for their recommendations. They may send requests back for further information or clarification or approvals. Permission for a survey should be sent first to the Survey Committee, prior to submission to the IRB. The Survey Committee may provide important insights and/or suggestions to strengthen the survey research design. The IRB has the final authority with regard to human subjects. RELATED DOCUMENTS, FORMS AND TOOLS Not Applicable HISTORY AND UPDATES Date Approved: August 1, 2014 Date of Promulgation: September 9, 2014 APPENDIX Not Applicable 5