Cooper Upper Elementary School

Similar documents
Cooper Upper Elementary School

Shelters Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Educational Attainment

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

University of Arizona


Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Hokulani Elementary School

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

State of New Jersey

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

New Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)

Kahului Elementary School

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Bellevue University Admission Application

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

12-month Enrollment

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

Raw Data Files Instructions

Essentials of Ability Testing. Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Best Colleges Main Survey

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Updated: December Educational Attainment

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Pathways to College Preparatory Advanced Academic Offerings in the Anchorage School District

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Bellehaven Elementary

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

El Toro Elementary School

African American Male Achievement Update

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Financing Education In Minnesota

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Meeting the Challenges of No Child Left Behind in U.S. Immersion Education

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

46 Children s Defense Fund

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

Evaluation of Teach For America:

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

Executive Summary. Hamilton High School

Rural Education in Oregon

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Denver Public Schools

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

Georgia Department of Education

Transcription:

LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS http://cooper.livoniapublicschools.org 215-216 Annual Education Report BOARD OF EDUCATION 215-16 Colleen Burton, President Dianne Laura, Vice President Tammy Bonifield, Secretary Dan Centers, Trustee Liz Jarvis, Trustee Mark Johnson, Trustee Eileen McDonnell, Trustee Andrea L. Oquist, Superintendent 2855 Ann Arbor Trail Westland, MI 48185 734-744-271 Theresa O Brien, Principal 216-217 Sarah Aherne, Principal 215-216 Marjorie Moore, Kristi Principal Collyer, Assistant Principal

15125 Farmington Road Livonia MI 48154 Phone (734) 744-25 March 1, 217 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the Annual Education Report (AER) which provides key information on the 215-16 educational progress for. The AER addresses the complex reporting information required by federal and state laws. The school s report contains information about student assessment, accountability and teacher quality. If you have any questions about the AER, please contact the Principal of, for assistance. The AER is available for you to review electronically by visiting the following web site http://cooper.livoniapublicschools.org or you may review a copy in the main office of our school. For the 216-17 year, no new Priority or Focus schools were named by the Michigan Department of Education; some Priority or Focus schools did exit their status because they met the exit criteria. New Reward schools were identified using school rankings and Beating the Odds information. A Focus school is one that has a large achievement gap between the highest and lowest achieving 3% of schools. A Priority school is one whose achievement and growth is in the lowest 5% of all schools in the state. A Reward school is one that has achieved one or more of the following distinctions: top 5% of schools on the Top-to-Bottom School Rankings, top 5% of schools making the greatest gains in achievement (improvement metric), or Beating the Odds by outperforming the school s predicted ranking and/or similar schools. Some schools are not identified with any of these labels. In these cases no label is given. Our school has not been given one of these labels. The AER has two major sections to it that are required by state law. The information contained in the first section was compiled by district staff. It presents relevant information about our district, our academic programs, school improvement efforts, two years of results on district developed assessments and nationally norm referenced assessments. It also includes the district s parent involvement policy and specialized programs. The second section of the report contains information provided by the Michigan Department of Education. Based on this data, our school has identified underperforming subgroups of students, including economically disadvantaged students for whom additional intervention and support is needed in order to increase their proficiency and to close the achievement gap in the targeted areas. In order to accelerate student achievement, Cooper Upper Elementary has put in place is a multi-tiered system of support that provides supplemental instruction to our most at risk students through our Title I literacy and math support groups during the summer and throughout the school year. In addition, we will be addressing the achievement gap for our economically disadvantaged students by providing ongoing professional development on teaching students of poverty. Finally, continuous analysis of formative assessments to determine the needs of all students, followed by the provision of targeted learning intervention to students in need is being undertaken to close persistent gaps in achievement. These initiatives are intended to accelerate the student achievement of subgroups, including the state s Bottom 3%, that are not meeting our school s proficiency targets. 2

Our collaborative efforts positively impact our school s success and student achievement. Sincerely, Theresa O Brien Principal Livonia Public Schools prohibits unlawful discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, height, weight, marital status, handicap or disability in any of its educational programs or activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquires and grievances regarding discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, height, weight, and marital status-director of Human Resources, 15125 Farmington Road, Livonia, MI 48154 at (734) 744-2566. The following person has been designated to handle inquires and grievances regarding discrimination based on handicap or disability-director of Student Services, 15125 Farmington Road, Livonia, MI 48154 at (734) 744-2524. MISSION STATEMENT Everyone Learning, Everyone Leading, Together. VISION Cooper will become an innovative and collaborative environment where students, staff, parents, and community work together to create an authentic learning environment that differentiates and sets high expectations for future leaders to find their voice while providing structure and safety that respects the needs of all. SCHOOL PROFILE serves 686 students in grades 5 and 6. The principal at during 215-16 was Ms. Sarah Aherne. The principal beginning 216-17 is Mrs. Theresa O Brien and the assistant principal is Ms. Kristi Collyer. There are 33 professional teaching staff members and one media specialist. In addition, there are the following professional support staff members: a school psychologist, a school social worker, one learning specialist, one Elementary Student Assistance Provider (E.S.A.P.), a speech and language therapist, as well as homebound or hospitalized services. 3

State law requires that we report the following additional information. ASSIGNING PUPILS TO THE SCHOOL All students are assigned to based upon residence within the geographic boundaries of the school, as well as students who transfer to Cooper based on space availability. SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT School improvement is a process in which stakeholders in a school work cooperatively to improve student achievement. The process relies on parents, staff, and students participating in collaborative decision making. The goals are determined through analysis of student achievement data and survey information. Action plans using proven interventions are developed for each improvement goal and progress toward achievement of the goals is documented annually. Our goals for the 214-215 and 215-216 school year are: 1. All Cooper students will be proficient in basic math computation with precision and fluency. 2. All Cooper students will be proficient in informational reading. 3. All Cooper students will be proficient in writing. The Livonia Public Schools School District has had its District Level accreditation through AdvanceEd. Through the district accreditation process, also received AdvancED accreditation. The AdvancED accreditation process supports and validates district and school level improvement efforts. SPECIALIZED SCHOOLS OR PROGRAMS At the elementary level, students may be enrolled in Alternative Classrooms for the Academically Talented (ACAT) at Webster Elementary School and special education centers at Buchanan, Cass, Coolidge, Kennedy, Johnson and Webster. Preschool special education programs are located at various locations in the district. Other special education programs are available in western Wayne County for our students with disabilities, based upon their individual needs. Niji-Iro Japanese Immersion Elementary School is also available. A preschool is operated at the Jackson Center. Specific information about these programs is available on the district Web site at www.livoniapublicschools.org. CORE CURRICULUM The core curriculum at Cooper Upper Elementary provides learning experiences in reading, writing, speaking, listening, spelling, handwriting, mathematics, social studies, science, technology, health, physical education, art, instrumental music, vocal music, library/research skills and enrichment activities. The core curriculum is based on the grade level content expectations (GLCEs) from the 4

Michigan Department of Education and the Common Core State Standards for and English Language Arts. The goal of education is to provide all learners with a solid foundation of skills, knowledge, and understandings that are necessary for their continual growth and success as students within the school setting and as adults in society. As a result of sound K-12 education based on well-defined educational outcomes, a Livonia Public School graduate will: Respect self, others, and the environment. Communicate effectively. Know how to learn and work productively. Acquire and process information. Use critical and creative thinking to make decisions and solve problems. Work and participate independently and cooperatively. Acquire a core of understanding and competencies within the content areas. A copy of the core curriculum may be obtained from the district s Academic Services Department. STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT ON DISTRICT DEVELOPED AND NATIONAL ASSESSMENTS DISTRICT LITERACY ASSESSMENTS Students in grades 5-6 are assessed using the Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System. Teachers administer running records with comprehension to students one-on-one a minimum of two times each year. The following table shows the percent of students at each grade level that performed at or above grade level on this assessment. FOUNTAS AND PINNELL BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS GRADES 5-6 Percent of Students that Performed At or Above Grade Level Spring 216 Grade 5 Grade 6 Cooper 87% 83% District 88% 85% Spring 215 Grade 5 Grade 6 Cooper 86% 87% District 87% 88% DISTRICT MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS Students in grades 1-6 were assessed on their attainment of grade level mathematics standards three times during the school year using the i-ready Math Diagnostic Assessment. The following chart show the percentage of students who were on or above grade level on the spring i-ready Diagnostic Assessment. 5

i-ready MATHEMATICS Percent of Students On or Above Grade Level 215-216 Grade 5 Grade 6 Cooper 32.% 21.% District 46.% 31.% Students were assessed in mathematics knowledge twice during the 214-215 school year. Students in grades 1-5 were assessed using a Pre/Post online assessment. The following data show the percentage of students who were proficient at each grade level on the Pre/Post mathematics benchmark assessment. MATHEMATICS BENCHMARK: ELEMENTARY ASSESSMENTS GRADE 5 Percent of Students Proficient Numbers & Numeration Operations & Computations Measurement Reference Frames Patterns, Functions, Algebra Data & Chance 214-15 Geometry Total* Pre-Test Cooper 46% 49% 47% 5% 51% 65% 5% District 49% 53% 5% 54% 53% 67% 54% Post-Test Cooper 6% 64% 58% 65% 59% 76% 63% District 69% 71% 64% 71% 64% 78% 7% *Total score indicates proficiency in all 6 strands. NORM REFERENCED ASSESSMENT The Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS) and the Cognitive Ability Test (CogAT) from Riverside Publishing are administered to sixth grade students. ITBS GRADE 6 Median Grade Equivalent Score Reading 215-216 All Students Male Female All Students Male Female Cooper 5.6 5.4 5.8 5.6 5.7 5.6 District 6.1 6. 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.4 214-215 Cooper 6. 6. 5.9 6. 6.2 5.8 District 6.4 6.3 6.4 6.6 6.8 6.4 6

CogAT GRADE 6 Age Percentiles 215-216 Verbal Quantitative Nonverbal Composite Cooper 5 5 57 52 District 57 6 62 61 214-215 Cooper 58 54 61 58 District 61 63 65 65 PARENT TEACHER CONFERENCES One of the most important factors in success in school for a child is the involvement of the parent or guardian in the educational process. Parent-teacher conferences were attended by 93% (682 conferences held) of our parents during 214-215 and 89% during 215-216. Cooper Upper Elementary parental involvement also includes attendance at our Curriculum Nights, Art Fair, Vocal and Instrumental Music Concerts, Title I, and The Leader In Me events. Open House attendance was 85% during 214-215 and 83% during 215-216. PARENT INVOLVEMENT The district s Parent Involvement Plan is available on the district s website, which is linked to each school s website. BOARD POLICY IDD(1) PARENT INVOLVEMENT JUNE 2, 211 The Board strongly encourages and welcomes the involvement of parent(s)/guardian(s) in all of the District s educational programs. It is recognized and appreciated that parents/guardians are the first teachers of their children, and that their interest and involvement in the education of their children should not diminish once their child enters the schools of the District. Accordingly, the Board directs, by the adoption of this policy, that the administration shall design a program/plan that will encourage parent(s)/guardian(s) participation that may include, but not be limited to: The development and review of instructional materials; input on the ways that the District may better provide parent(s)/guardian(s) with information concerning current laws, regulations, and instructional programs; and District offerings of training programs to instruct parent(s)/guardian(s) how to become more involved in their child s educational programs. Pursuant to state law, the Superintendent shall provide a copy of the District s Parental Involvement plan to all parents. Reference: 2 USCA 6316, 2 USCA 6318 (No Child Left Behind Act) 7

DATA FROM MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION These reports contain the following information: Student Assessment Data Includes the following three assessments: M-STEP (Michigan Student Test of Educational Progress), MI-Access (Alternate Assessment), and College Board SAT. Presents assessment information for English language arts and mathematics for grades 3 to 8 and 11, and science for grades 4, 7, and 11, compared to state averages for all students as well as subgroups of students. The report helps users to understand achievement performance within grades and schools, and to make comparisons to district, state, and national achievement benchmarks. Accountability Scorecard Detail Data and Status The accountability portion of the AER includes assessment proficiency and participation rates, graduation or attendance rates, as well as accountability scorecard status. Teacher Qualification Data Identifies teacher qualifications at district and school levels Reports percentage of core academic classes taught by teachers not considered highly qualified to teach such classes NAEP Data (National Assessment of Educational Progress) Provides state results of the national assessment in mathematics and reading every other year in grades 4 and 8 The following pages are provided by the Michigan Department of Education and cannot be amended, modified or adjusted. They must be included as provided by the state. 8

2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State Percent Students Proficient District Percent Students Proficient School Percent Students Proficient Percent Advanced Percent Proficient Percent Partially Proficient Percent Not Proficient All Students 214-15 48.7% 5.2% 35.9% 7.1% 28.8% 29.1% 35.% All Students 215-16 5.6% 51.2% 4.3% 1.5% 29.8% 28.3% 31.4% Indian or Alaska Native 215-16 43.% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 214-15 71.9% 72.7% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 215-16 74.7% 69.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African 214-15 22.5% 23.7% 25.8% 3.2% 22.6% 22.6% 51.6% Black or African 215-16 23.7% 18.8% 22.2% 3.7% 18.5% 4.7% 37.% Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 35.4% 45.5% 33.3% 9.5% 23.8% 38.1% 28.6% Hispanic of Any Race 215-16 38.4% 4.4% 28.% 12.% 16.% 4.% 32.% Two or More Races 214-15 47.6% 48.5% 21.4%.% 21.4% 35.7% 42.9% Two or More Races 215-16 49.% 45.2% 36.8% 5.3% 31.6% 36.8% 26.3% White 214-15 55.7% 52.3% 38.2% 7.7% 3.5% 28.4% 33.3% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 1 of 31

2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 White 215-16 58.1% 55.7% 44.% 11.2% 32.8% 24.8% 31.2% Female 214-15 54.3% 56.1% 4.6% 8.% 32.6% 33.1% 26.3% Female 215-16 55.8% 6.3% 49.3% 13.% 36.3% 3.1% 2.5% Male 214-15 43.3% 44.6% 31.3% 6.1% 25.1% 25.1% 43.6% Male 215-16 45.5% 42.5% 33.% 8.4% 24.6% 26.8% 4.2% 214-15 32.6% 3.2% 24.8% 5.3% 19.5% 3.8% 44.4% 215-16 34.4% 37.9% 37.4% 7.3% 3.1% 28.5% 34.1% English Language Learners 214-15 22.7% 17.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners 215-16 23.1% 29.6% 2.%.% 2.% 2.% 6.% Students With Disabilities 214-15 14.6% 13.6% 8.5% 6.4% 2.1% 23.4% 68.1% Students With Disabilities 215-16 16.1% 16.7% 17.1% 2.9% 14.3% 17.1% 65.7% All Students 214-15 44.7% 52.2% 42.8% 9.7% 33.1% 33.1% 24.2% All Students 215-16 45.% 47.7% 34.% 8.2% 25.8% 3.6% 35.4% Asian 214-15 7.9% 74.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 2 of 31

2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 Asian 215-16 7.4% 75.% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African 214-15 2.% 39.% 33.3% 8.3% 25.% 25.% 41.7% Black or African 215-16 19.2% 21.9% 29.6% 3.7% 25.9% 25.9% 44.4% Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 32.% 4.% 44.% 8.% 36.% 24.% 32.% Hispanic of Any Race 215-16 31.7% 44.6% 3.4% 8.7% 21.7% 34.8% 34.8% Two or More Races 214-15 42.4% 44.4% 5.% 14.3% 35.7% 14.3% 35.7% Two or More Races 215-16 42.1% 56.7% 38.5%.% 38.5% 23.1% 38.5% White 214-15 51.2% 53.3% 42.7% 9.7% 33.% 35.4% 21.9% White 215-16 51.9% 49.1% 34.1% 9.1% 25.1% 31.4% 34.5% Female 214-15 51.1% 54.1% 44.4% 1.6% 33.9% 34.4% 21.2% Female 215-16 49.8% 55.4% 39.7% 11.5% 28.2% 32.2% 28.2% Male 214-15 38.6% 5.4% 4.9% 8.8% 32.2% 31.6% 27.5% Male 215-16 4.4% 4.3% 28.5% 5.% 23.5% 29.1% 42.5% 214-15 29.1% 38.6% 35.1% 6.7% 28.4% 29.1% 35.8% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 3 of 31

2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 215-16 28.3% 3.6% 28.6% 4.5% 24.1% 25.6% 45.9% English Language Learners 214-15 16.2% 25.% 1.% 1.%.% 6.% 3.% English Language Learners 215-16 15.% 9.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Students With Disabilities 214-15 1.3% 8.2% 4.9%.% 4.9% 29.3% 65.9% Students With Disabilities 215-16 1.8% 14.7% 11.8% 5.9% 5.9% 14.7% 73.5% All Students 214-15 33.4% 45.2% 29.7% 13.% 16.7% 34.8% 35.4% All Students 215-16 33.8% 44.9% 3.1% 1.1% 19.9% 38.3% 31.6% Indian or Alaska Native 215-16 26.% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 214-15 64.2% 75.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 215-16 63.9% 69.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African 214-15 9.1% 14.5% 22.6% 6.5% 16.1% 16.1% 61.3% Black or African 215-16 8.2% 8.8% 11.1% 3.7% 7.4% 44.4% 44.4% Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 19.5% 49.1% 4.% 15.% 25.% 4.% 2.% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 4 of 31

2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 Hispanic of Any Race 215-16 19.2% 37.7% 3.8% 19.2% 11.5% 23.1% 46.2% Two or More Races 214-15 3.5% 45.5% 21.4%.% 21.4% 28.6% 5.% Two or More Races 215-16 3.% 33.3% 31.6% 15.8% 15.8% 36.8% 31.6% White 214-15 39.7% 46.7% 3.5% 14.4% 16.1% 36.5% 33.% White 215-16 41.% 49.6% 31.6% 9.2% 22.4% 4.% 28.4% Female 214-15 32.6% 45.1% 28.2% 11.5% 16.7% 33.9% 37.9% Female 215-16 31.7% 45.9% 29.9% 7.5% 22.4% 42.2% 27.9% Male 214-15 34.1% 45.3% 31.3% 14.5% 16.8% 35.8% 33.% Male 215-16 35.8% 43.9% 3.2% 12.3% 17.9% 35.2% 34.6% 214-15 18.2% 24.2% 21.1% 9.% 12.% 33.8% 45.1% 215-16 17.7% 25.9% 2.3% 6.5% 13.8% 43.1% 36.6% English Language Learners 214-15 13.6% 26.7% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners 215-16 12.8% 31.% 9.1%.% 9.1% 36.4% 54.5% Students With Disabilities 214-15 9.4% 16.2% 12.8% 6.4% 6.4% 25.5% 61.7% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 5 of 31

2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 Students With Disabilities 215-16 1.2% 13.9% 11.8%.% 11.8% 14.7% 73.5% All Students 214-15 33.3% 44.7% 32.% 15.2% 16.9% 38.2% 29.8% All Students 215-16 32.8% 43.8% 28.2% 7.3% 2.9% 39.8% 31.9% Asian 214-15 65.2% 7.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 215-16 64.5% 71.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African 214-15 9.4% 14.6% 8.3% 4.2% 4.2% 25.% 66.7% Black or African 215-16 8.2% 12.5% 18.5%.% 18.5% 25.9% 55.6% Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 19.5% 25.5% 28.% 12.% 16.% 48.% 24.% Hispanic of Any Race 215-16 18.8% 4.% 3.4% 17.4% 13.% 47.8% 21.7% Two or More Races 214-15 29.3% 36.1% 35.7% 28.6% 7.1% 28.6% 35.7% Two or More Races 215-16 29.1% 43.3% 15.4%.% 15.4% 46.2% 38.5% White 214-15 39.3% 47.8% 34.2% 15.5% 18.7% 38.7% 27.1% White 215-16 39.2% 46.% 29.9% 7.6% 22.2% 39.9% 3.2% Female 214-15 34.1% 43.3% 3.1% 11.8% 18.3% 39.8% 3.1% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 6 of 31

2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 Female 215-16 31.4% 43.1% 23.6% 5.2% 18.4% 4.8% 35.6% Male 214-15 32.5% 46.% 34.1% 18.8% 15.3% 36.5% 29.4% Male 215-16 34.1% 44.6% 32.8% 9.4% 23.3% 38.9% 28.3% 214-15 17.6% 24.8% 2.6% 9.9% 1.7% 35.9% 43.5% 215-16 16.8% 19.6% 13.5% 1.5% 12.% 42.1% 44.4% English Language Learners 214-15 11.5% 18.2% 1.%.% 1.% 3.% 6.% English Language Learners 215-16 1.7% 13.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Students With Disabilities 214-15 7.8% 4.1%.%.%.% 26.8% 73.2% Students With Disabilities 215-16 7.2% 14.2% 8.8% 2.9% 5.9% 14.7% 76.5% All Students 214-15 22.2% 2.1% 9.4% 1.4% 8.% 64.2% 26.4% All Students 215-16 18.9% 19.3% 11.3%.3% 11.% 67.3% 21.4% Indian or Alaska Native 215-16 16.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 214-15 38.1% 36.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 215-16 35.8% 17.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 7 of 31

2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 Black or African 214-15 5.4% 4.% 6.5%.% 6.5% 51.6% 41.9% Black or African 215-16 4.3% 7.5% 7.1%.% 7.1% 57.1% 35.7% Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 12.3% 13.% 15.% 5.% 1.% 75.% 1.% Hispanic of Any Race 215-16 1.3% 13.2% 11.5%.% 11.5% 5.% 38.5% Two or More Races 214-15 2.5% 21.2%.%.%.% 42.9% 57.1% Two or More Races 215-16 17.6% 16.7% 15.8%.% 15.8% 63.2% 21.1% White 214-15 26.9% 21.3% 9.9% 1.4% 8.5% 65.8% 24.3% White 215-16 23.% 21.4% 11.6%.4% 11.2% 7.% 18.4% Female 214-15 2.6% 18.4% 8.%.6% 7.5% 69.% 23.% Female 215-16 16.7% 16.9% 7.4%.% 7.4% 73.% 19.6% Male 214-15 23.8% 21.6% 1.7% 2.2% 8.4% 59.6% 29.8% Male 215-16 21.% 21.6% 14.5%.6% 14.% 62.6% 22.9% 214-15 1.9% 8.6% 3.%.% 3.% 64.4% 32.6% 215-16 8.5% 9.2% 11.1%.% 11.1% 61.9% 27.% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 8 of 31

2/8/217 M-STEP Grades 3-11 English Language Learners 214-15 6.1%.% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners 215-16 3.7%.%.%.%.% 7.% 3.% Students With Disabilities 214-15 6.9% 1.1% 4.3% 2.1% 2.1% 42.6% 53.2% Students With Disabilities 215-16 5.6% 6.4% 2.7%.% 2.7% 48.6% 48.6% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 9 of 31

2/8/217 SAT Location Name School Year Subject Student Group Mean SAT Score Benchmark Met or Exceeded % Met or Exceeded Did Not Meet % Did Not Meet Number Assessed No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 1 of 31

2/8/217 MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State Percent Students Proficient District Percent Students Proficient School Percent Students Proficient Percent Surpassed Percent Attained Percent Emerging All Students 214-15 66.4% 5.% 4.%.% 4.% 6.% All Students 215-16 8.4% 77.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 All Students 214-15 65.5% 36.4% 3.%.% 3.% 7.% All Students 215-16 59.5% 58.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 All Students 214-15 39.7% 2.% 2.%.% 2.% 8.% Asian 214-15 62.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 214-15 74.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 214-15 2.% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African 214-15 56.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African 214-15 57.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African 214-15 3.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 61.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 67.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 11 of 31

2/8/217 MI-Access Functional Independence Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 4.% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 White 214-15 71.5% 45.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 White 215-16 83.1% 78.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 White 214-15 68.6% 25.% <1 <1 <1 <1 White 215-16 63.7% 69.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 White 214-15 45.4% 18.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 Female 214-15 68.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Female 215-16 81.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Female 214-15 61.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Female 215-16 53.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Female 214-15 38.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Male 214-15 65.3% 53.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 Male 215-16 8.1% 81.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 Male 214-15 67.8% 41.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 Male 215-16 62.9% 7.% <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 12 of 31

2/8/217 MI-Access Functional Independence Male 214-15 4.4% 18.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 214-15 66.% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 215-16 82.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 214-15 66.3% 3.% <1 <1 <1 <1 215-16 6.3% 6.% <1 <1 <1 <1 214-15 4.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners 214-15 6.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners 214-15 72.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners 214-15 35.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 All Students 214-15 68.1% 53.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 All Students 214-15 67.8% 5.% <1 <1 <1 <1 White 214-15 7.5% 63.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 White 214-15 69.4% 6.% <1 <1 <1 <1 Female 214-15 72.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 13 of 31

2/8/217 MI-Access Functional Independence Female 214-15 64.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Male 214-15 66.% 54.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 Male 214-15 69.7% 5.% <1 <1 <1 <1 214-15 69.3% 4.% <1 <1 <1 <1 214-15 69.9% 4.% <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners 214-15 59.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners 214-15 58.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 14 of 31

2/8/217 MI-Access Supported Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State Percent Students Proficient District Percent Students Proficient School Percent Students Proficient Percent Surpassed Percent Attained Percent Emerging No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 15 of 31

2/8/217 MI-Access Participation Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State Percent Students Proficient District Percent Students Proficient School Percent Students Proficient Percent Surpassed Percent Attained Percent Emerging All Students 214-15 53.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 All Students 214-15 63.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African 214-15 54.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Black or African 214-15 66.% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Male 214-15 52.7% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Male 214-15 63.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 16 of 31

2/8/217 Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Subject State Tested Total State Percent Proficient District Tested Total District Percent Proficient* School Tested Total School Percent Proficient** All Students 98.7% 69.6% 99.4% 75.2% 99.% 58.4% All Students 98.6% 62.1% 99.3% 71.6% 98.8% 58.8% All Students Science 98.1% 5.% 99.1% 6.% N/A N/A All Students 98.1% 59.3% 99.% 68.1% 98.2% 31.7% Bottom 3% N/A 25.1% N/A 22.1% N/A 7.1% Bottom 3% N/A 19.% N/A 17.% N/A 15.6% Bottom 3% Science N/A 9.8% N/A 13.4% N/A N/A Bottom 3% N/A 13.3% N/A 16.2% N/A.% Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native 98.4% 63.4% <3 <3 <3 <3 98.4% 55.9% <3 <3 <3 <3 Science 98.% 46.3% <3 <3 N/A N/A 97.3% 54.5% <3 <3 <3 <3 Asian 99.3% 84.3% 99.3% 84.4% <3 <3 Asian 99.4% 83.7% 99.7% 86.% <3 <3 Asian Science 99.3% 65.5% 1.% 78.1% N/A N/A Asian 99.3% 76.% 1.% 76.8% <3 <3 Black or African Black or African Black or African Black or African Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race 97.7% 46.9% 99.2% 56.4% 98.2% 5.9% 97.4% 37.3% 98.9% 47.4% 96.4% 55.8% Science 96.5% 23.9% 99.7% 34.1% N/A N/A 96.6% 33.6% 98.6% 46.% <3 <3 98.8% 6.8% 99.7% 72.9% 1.% 71.4% 98.8% 51.1% 99.7% 63.9% 1.% 51.2% Science 98.1% 36.7% 99.3% 54.4% N/A N/A A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 17 of 31

2/8/217 Accountability Details Subject Data Hispanic of Any Race Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races Two or More Races Two or More Races Two or More Races 98.% 47.7% 98.7% 62.4% <3 <3 99.5% 72.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A 99.7% 65.9% N/A N/A N/A N/A Science 99.7% 59.6% N/A N/A N/A N/A 99.6% 65.7% N/A N/A N/A N/A 98.9% 67.8% 1.% 69.9% 1.% 56.7% 98.7% 59.2% 99.6% 69.1% 97.% 66.7% Science 98.5% 45.2% 1.% 6.5% N/A N/A 98.5% 57.3% 1.% 65.% <3 <3 White 99.% 75.6% 99.3% 77.1% 98.9% 58.2% White 98.9% 68.4% 99.3% 74.1% 99.1% 59.3% White Science 98.6% 57.1% 98.9% 62.2% N/A N/A White 98.5% 65.8% 99.% 7.6% 98.% 33.7% English Language Learners English Language Learners 98.3% 56.8% 99.2% 62.7% 98.5% 54.1% 98.2% 48.5% 99.1% 57.2% 97.7% 51.% Science 97.5% 35.% 99.% 46.4% N/A N/A 97.5% 43.9% 98.6% 53.8% 98.4% 23.9% 98.8% 49.5% 99.3% 59.3% <3 <3 99.% 48.4% 99.3% 66.9% <3 <3 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 18 of 31

2/8/217 Accountability Details Subject Data English Language Learners English Language Learners Students With Disabilities Students With Disabilities Students With Disabilities Students With Disabilities Science 98.5% 22.% 99.1% 35.% N/A N/A 98.2% 3.9% 97.4% 42.3% <3 <3 97.2% 4.1% 99.% 47.3% 98.6% 42.1% 97.1% 36.5% 98.8% 42.1% 97.2% 46.2% Science 97.% 26.5% 98.3% 35.% N/A N/A 96.6% 3.8% 98.6% 39.3% 1.% 18.9% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 19 of 31

2/8/217 Accountability Details Graduation Data Student Group Statewide District School All Students 79.79% 91.33% N/A Indian or Alaska Native 7.88% N/A N/A Asian 9.77% 1.% N/A Black or African 67.31% 78.85% N/A Hispanic of Any Race 72.7% 81.58% N/A Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 76.67% N/A N/A Two or More Races 74.74% 92.86% N/A White 83.48% 92.53% N/A Female 83.76% N/A N/A Male 76.% N/A N/A 67.48% 83.% N/A English Language Learners 72.14% N/A N/A Students With Disabilities 57.12% 61.81% N/A Bottom 3% N/A N/A N/A * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 2 of 31

2/8/217 Accountability Details Attendance Data Student Group Statewide District School All Students 94.32% 96.% 95.63% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 21 of 31

2/8/217 Accountability Status District Data District Name Status Score Math Status Math Score Science Status Science Score Social Studies Status Social Studies Score Overall Status Overall Score No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 22 of 31

2/8/217 Accountability Status School Data School Name Status Score Math Status Math Score Science Status Science Score Social Studies Status Social Studies Score Overall Status Overall Score Cooper Upper Elementary School Green 2 Green 2 Green 2 Lime 42 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 23 of 31

2/8/217 Teacher Quality - Qualification Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School Other B.A. M.A. P.H.D. 8 31 Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (e.g., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers Teacher Quality - Class School Aggregate High-Poverty Schools Low-Poverty Schools Percentage of Core Academic Subject Elementary and Secondary School Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers.% N/A N/A Teacher Quality - Provisional Certification Percent Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School with Emergency Certification.% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 24 of 31

2/8/217 NAEP Grade 4 Math Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students 1 23 77 34 5 Male Female 51 49 22 23 78 77 36 32 6 4 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 47 53 # 36 1 64 9 17 49 1 9 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 72 15 6 4 1 # 3 15 53 38 11 85 47 62 89 39 1 21 58 5 &#35 3 19 &#8225 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 12 88 47 19 53 81 14 37 1 5 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 5 95 42 22 Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 215 Achievement. 58 78 16 35 1 5 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 25 of 31

2/8/217 NAEP Grade 8 Math Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students 1 32 39 22 7 Male Female 51 49 31 34 39 39 23 21 7 6 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 45 55 # 48 19 39 4 12 3 2 11 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 69 2 4 3 1 # 2 23 66 38 11 43 29 44 18 26 5 15 39 7 # 4 32 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 11 89 77 27 19 41 3 24 # 7 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 3 97 54 32 Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 215 Achievement. 33 39 11 22 2 7 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 26 of 31

2/8/217 NAEP Grade 12 Math Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students 1 34 41 23 2 Male Female 51 49 32 35 41 42 26 22 1 1 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 35 64 54 22 37 44 9 32 2 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 76 14 5 3 1 1 26 68 58 26 42 27 33 32 3 5 9 35 2 7 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 9 91 78 3 19 43 3 25 2 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 2 98 33 Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 215 Achievement. 41 24 2 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 27 of 31

2/8/217 NAEP Grade 4 Reading Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students 1 37 63 29 5 Male Female 5 5 39 34 61 66 26 31 5 6 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 48 52 # 5 24 5 76 16 4 1 8 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 72 14 6 4 1 # 3 32 66 49 16 3 68 34 51 84 7 32 9 17 49 37 6 1 1 15 8 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 12 88 76 32 24 68 7 31 # 6 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 4 96 52 36 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 215 Reading Assessment. 48 64 16 29 2 5 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 28 of 31

2/8/217 NAEP Grade 8 Reading Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students 1 24 44 29 3 Male Female 51 49 29 2 45 42 25 34 2 4 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 45 55 # 37 14 45 43 17 39 1 4 Race/Ethnicity White Black or Afican Hispanic Asian/Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Indian or Alaska Native Two or More Races 69 2 4 3 1 2 18 47 27 13 44 44 41 35 34 9 29 41 3 &#35 3 1 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 1 9 64 2 3 45 5 32 # 3 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 3 97 57 23 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 215 Reading Assessment. 37 44 6 3 # 3 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 29 of 31

2/8/217 NAEP Grade 12 Reading Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students 1 26 5 27 5 Male Female 5 5 31 2 37 37 28 37 4 6 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 35 64 1 37 19 39 36 22 38 2 7 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 76 14 5 3 1 2 52 34 21 38 36 44 26 36 12 21 41 6 1 12 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 7 93 66 23 25 38 8 34 1 5 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 2 98 25 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 215 Reading Assessment. 37 33 5 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 3 of 31

2/8/217 NAEP Participation Data Grade Subject Participation Rate for Students with Disabilities Standard Error Participation Rate for Limited English Proficient Students Standard Error 4 Math Reading 87 73 1.9 3.7 95 9 2. 2.5 8 Math Reading 84 76 3.6 3.3 84 83 5.2 4. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 31 of 31