A Diagnostic Tool for Taking your Program s Pulse

Similar documents
Testing Schedule. Explained

District English Language Learners (ELL) Plan

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

Educational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

State Parental Involvement Plan

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

West Haven School District English Language Learners Program

Curriculum and Assessment Guide (CAG) Elementary California Treasures First Grade

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

Northeast Credit Union Scholarship Application

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Master Plan for English Learners

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Welcome to the session on ACCUPLACER Policy Development. This session will touch upon common policy decisions an institution may encounter during the

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

WARREN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CUMULATIVE RECORD CHANGE CHANGE DATE: JULY 8, 2014 REVISED 11/10/2014

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

ESL Curriculum and Assessment

Strategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013

ARTICLE IV: STUDENT ACTIVITIES

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

NATIONAL LOUIS UNIVERSITY ESL and/or BILINGUAL ENDORSMENTS ESL and/or BILINGUAL SPECIAL EDUCATION APPROVALS

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Handbook for Graduate Students in TESL and Applied Linguistics Programs

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Time Task Calendar SECONDARY

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

3.7 General Education Homebound (GEH) Program

Information Packet. Home Education ELC West Amelia Street Orlando, FL (407) FAX: (407)

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

New Jersey Department of Education

Your School and You. Guide for Administrators

Implementing Response to Intervention (RTI) National Center on Response to Intervention

Executive Summary. Gautier High School

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Comprehensive Progress Report

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Cooper Upper Elementary School

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

State Budget Update February 2016

Meeting the Challenges of No Child Left Behind in U.S. Immersion Education

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

TOEIC Bridge Test Secure Program guidelines

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

GPI Partner Training Manual. Giving a student the opportunity to study in another country is the best investment you can make in their future

The Mission of Teacher Education in a Center of Pedagogy Geared to the Mission of Schooling in a Democratic Society.

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

ESL Summer Camp: June 18 July 27, 2012 Homestay Application (Please answer all questions completely)

Tamwood Language Centre Policies Revision 12 November 2015

REGULATION RESPECTING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT AND SPECIALIST'S CERTIFICATES BY THE COLLÈGE DES MÉDECINS DU QUÉBEC

K12 International Academy

University of Richmond Teacher Preparation Handbook

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Running head: FINAL CASE STUDY, EDCI Addressing a Training Gap. Final Case Study. Anna Siracusa. Purdue University

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate.

School Year Enrollment Policies

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

success. It will place emphasis on:

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

OPEN-ENROLLMENT CHARTER CONTRACT RENEWAL APPLICATION

SLOAN-HENDRIX SCHOOL DISTRICT 2016 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE PUBLIC ADVANC-ED ACCREDITATION

TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

International Undergraduate Application for Admission

Azusa Pacific University Azusa, CA

EDUCATION. Readmission. Residency Requirements and Time Limits. Transfer of Credits. Rules and Procedures. Program of Study

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

UTAH PARTICIPATION AND ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY

Shelters Elementary School

CIN-SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION

THE M.A. DEGREE Revised 1994 Includes All Further Revisions Through May 2012

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Transcription:

A Diagnostic Tool for Taking your Program s Pulse The questionnaire that follows is a print-friendly version of the Diagnostic Tool for self-evaluating English language programs in states, districts and schools. This document is meant to provide users with a simple form for recording information about their programs in response to the 12 primary questions and related sub-questions that are critical to a successful and compliant program for ELs. We encourage users to take substantive notes about their findings for each numbered sub-question, and make a holistic rating about how well their education agency is fulfilling the responsibilities associated with each. Based on sub-question ratings, users may estimate an overall rating for each primary question. Please note that this tool is meant to support administrators efforts to identify areas of strength and areas for improvement for their language programs and services; it cannot guarantee a program s compliance with federal requirements. This tool is best used as a first step in an education agency s work to identify and address practices that would benefit from tighter scrutiny, improved conceptualization, or further study to determine their quality. Useful next steps after completing this questionnaire might include: Gathering parents, teachers, students and/ or administrators for focus groups to get their input on effective programs and services; Organizing committees to address specific areas for improvement and highlight program strengths; Consulting personnel in one s governing agency (e.g., the state education agency if the questionnaire has been completed by a local education agency) for support to determine a course of action; Consulting outside experts to determine a plan for improvement; and, Making alterations to the language instruction program, EL screening or identification practices, or other programs within one s state, district, or school. If you or your districts have questions when using this tool, we encourage you to be in touch with edcount, LLC for further support: Sara Waring swaring@edcount.com edcount, LLC 1

Identification and Placement Summary of Diagnostic Questions 1. Is there a standardized process in place for identification and placement of ELs? 1.1 Does the process include: 1.1.1 A home language survey or other method for identifying students who may need language support services? 1.1.2 A standardized screener to determine language proficiency? 1.1.2.1 How is the screener administered and scored? 1.2 Are additional support services provided for ELs based on the results of the standardized placement screener? 1.2.1 In addition to screening for language needs, are ELs also screened for performance in other content areas? 1.2.2 If not, how is placement in other subjects determined? 2. How are the results of a student s placement into a language instruction program communicated to the parents, student and school? 2.1 Are parents notified within 30 days after the beginning of the school year, or within 2 weeks if their child enrolls after the beginning of the year? 2.1.1 Are notifications provided to parents in a language they can understand? 2.1.2 Does the parental notification of placement results include information about parents ability to opt out of the program? 2.1.3 Does the parental notification letter include all of the information required under Title I section 1112(g)(1)(A)/Title III Section 3302(a)? 2.2 Are content teachers notified if/when EL students are placed in their classes? 2.1.1 Do content instructors receive any information about the linguistic proficiency and/or academic ability of newly identified ELs who are placed in their classes? 2.1.2 Do content instructors receive any other information about newly identified ELs who are placed in their classes? edcount, LLC 2

Instruction 3. Is there a program in place to help ELs learn English so that they may eventually participate in mainstream content classes without linguistic support? 3.1 Is the program for language instruction based on sound research and theory? 3.2 Is the language instruction program implemented thoroughly and with fidelity? 3.3 Is the language instruction program designed to ensure that all ELs receive appropriate service, regardless of their age, native language, native language proficiency, or formal education background? 3.4 Does the language instruction program have a long-term vision for ELs academic achievement? Specifically, does the program: 3.4.1 Provide ELs with instruction in both English language development and the language of academic content? 3.4.2 Ensure that ELs who exit are prepared to access grade-level content instruction in English? 3.4.3 Have a clear, research-based vision for the timeframe in which students are expected to acquire English? 3.4.3.1 Does this vision appropriately differentiate for variables such as age, native language proficiency, formal education background, etc., that may affect the rate at which different students acquire English? 3.5 Is there a process for ensuring that students whose parents waive their right to services receive linguistic support in mainstream classes? 4. Is there a system in place to ensure that staff are adequately qualified to assist ELs with becoming proficient in English and experiencing success in academic content classes? 4.1 Do teachers within the language instruction program(s) have the appropriate qualifications? 4.1.1 Are teachers who deliver instruction in students native language fluent in the language of instruction? 4.1.2 Are teachers who deliver ESL instruction licensed with a state certification or other endorsement? 4.1.3 If teachers within the language instruction program are also teaching academic content courses (English, mathematics, science, history/social science), do they have a state endorsement or certification in the content course? 4.2 Do all teachers with ELs in their classes (content or language instruction) understand their responsibility to ensure these students can access their instruction? 4.3 Do all teachers receive professional development for learning and implementing best practices for instruction for ELs? edcount, LLC 3

Assessment 5. Is there a standardized English Language Proficiency Assessment (ELPA) in place to determine whether ELs are making progress in learning English and exiting the language program in a reasonable timeframe? 5.1 Do all ELs in all grade-levels (K-12) take the ELPA on an annual basis, as required by federal law? 5.2 Do all persons involved with the administration (and scoring, if applicable) of the ELPA receive adequate training? 5.3 What evidence is there that ELPA scores accurately reflect students proficiency in English? 5.4 Does the ELPA and information from ELPA scores adequately determine whether: 5.4.1 ELs are acquiring English language skills at a pace that is consistent with the program goals? 5.4.2 ELs are receiving instruction in both English language development and the language of academic content? 5.5 Is a system in place to share EL performance results across schools, districts, and states if students transfer? 6. Is there a system in place to ensure that parents or guardians of ELs are informed of their child s progress in learning English on the ELPA as well as their performance on the statewide academic content assessments? 6.1 Is the information provided to parents or guardians in a language they can understand? 6.2 Are allowances made for parent or guardians who may not be literate in English or their native language? Exit and Redesignation 7. Is there a process in place for transitioning ELs out of the language instructional program? 7.1 Are parents, teachers, and other appropriate staff involved in the process? 7.2 What criteria have been established for program exit? 7.3 What documentation and records are maintained for program exit? edcount, LLC 4

8. Is there a system in place to monitor the performance of former ELs to ensure that their English skills are sufficient for them to perform successfully in regular classes? 8.1 How are former ELs performing compared to other students? Is there a disparity or gap? 8.2 Are multiple measures used to assess the overall performance of former ELs such as review of grades, meeting promotion and graduation requirements, parent/teacher feedback as well as standardized test results? Equity and Access 9. Is there a system in place to ensure that ELs have access to, and are participating in, the same programs and services as all other students? 9.1 Are ELs enrolled in advanced courses? 9.2 Are ELs participating in gifted and talented programs? 9.3 If needed, are ELs participating in special education programs? 9.4 Are ELs participating in extracurricular programs such as sports, clubs, band, orchestra, chorus, school government, the newspaper, the yearbook, etc? 10. Is there a system in place to support ELs in graduating from high school and accessing postsecondary options? 10.1 Are ELs graduating at similar rates as all other students? 10.2 What is being done to ensure that ELs are not dropping out of school? 10.3 How are transcripts evaluated and credits awarded for secondary work completed in other countries? 10.4 Are supports in place to assist ELs with applying to college, technical training, or other postsecondary options? 11. Is there a system in place to ensure that parents or guardians of ELs are involved in the program planning process? 11.1 What type of outreach efforts are conducted to ensure that parents are involved in planning? 11.1.1 Are parents or guardians of ELs involved in state, district and school committees at the same rate as other stakeholders? 11.1.2 What method is in place to minimize language barriers, if applicable? edcount, LLC 5

Program Design and Evaluation 12. Is there a system in place to evaluate the effectiveness of the program? 12.1 Does the program have clearly defined goals by which to measure whether or not it is working? 12.2 How are program goals evaluated? 12.3 Can it be shown that the program is being implemented with sufficient resources to ensure it is functioning as intended? 12.4 What is considered a reasonable amount of time for ELs to learn English? Does it differ by age, grade, time in program? 12.4.1 Is this estimation based on scientifically based evidence? 12.5 What is the process for changing the program if it is found not to be effective? edcount, LLC 6

Dimension 1: Identification and Placement 1. Is there a standardized process in place for identification and placement of ELs? 1.1. Does the process include: 1.1.1. A home language survey or other method for identifying students who may need language support services? 1.1.2. A standardized screener to determine language proficiency? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 1 of30

Dimension 1: Identification and Placement 1. Is there a standardized process in place for identification and placement of ELs? 1.1.2.1. How is the screener administered and scored? 1.2. Are additional support services provided for ELs based on the results of the standardized placement screener? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 2 of30

Dimension 1: Identification and Placement 1. Is there a standardized process in place for identification and placement of ELs? 1.2.1. In addition to screening for language needs, are ELs also screened for performance in other content areas? 1.2.2. If not, how is placement in other subjects determined? Overall rating for Question 1: Fully Implemented Partially Implemented Not Implemented edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 3 of30

Dimension 1: Identification and Placement 2. How are the results of student s placement into a language instruction program communicated to the parents, student and school? 2.1. Are parents notified within 30 days after the beginning of the school year, or within 2 weeks if their child enrolls after the beginning of the year? 2.1.1 Are notifications provided to parents in a language they can understand? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 4 of30

Dimension 1: Identification and Placement 2. How are the results of student s placement into a language instruction program communicated to the parents, student and school? 2.1.2 Does the parental notification of placement results include information about parents ability to opt out of the program? 2.1.3 Does the parental notification letter include all of the information required under Title I section 1112(g)(1)(A)/Title III Section 3302(a)? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 5 of30

Dimension 1: Identification and Placement 2. How are the results of student s placement into a language instruction program communicated to the parents, student and school? 2.2. Are content teachers notified if/when EL students are placed in their classes? 2.2.1 Do content instructors receive any information about the linguistic proficiency and/or academic ability of newly identified ELs who are placed in their classes? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 6 of30

Dimension 1: Identification and Placement 2. How are the results of student s placement into a language instruction program communicated to the parents, student and school? 2.2.2 Do content instructors receive any other information about newly identified ELs who are placed in their classes? Overall rating for Question 2: Fully Implemented Partially Implemented Not Implemented edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 7 of30

Dimension 2: Instruction 3. Is there a program in place to help ELs learn English so that they may eventually participate in mainstream content classes without linguistic support? 3.1. Is the program for language instruction based on sound research and theory? 3.2. Is the language instruction program implemented thoroughly and with fidelity? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 8 of30

Dimension 2: Instruction 3. Is there a program in place to help ELs learn English so that they may eventually participate in mainstream content classes without linguistic support? 3.3 Is the language instruction program designed to ensure that all ELs receive appropriate service, regardless of their age, native language, native language proficiency, or formal education background? 3.4 Does the language instruction program have a long-term vision for ELs academic achievement? Specifically, does the program: 3.4.1 Provide ELs with instruction in both English language development and the language of academic content? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 9 of30

Dimension 2: Instruction 3. Is there a program in place to help ELs learn English so that they may eventually participate in mainstream content classes without linguistic support? 3.4 Does the language instruction program have a long-term vision for ELs academic achievement? Specifically, does the program: 3.4.2 Ensure that ELs who exit are prepared to access grade-level content instruction in English? 3.4 Does the language instruction program have a long-term vision for ELs academic achievement? Specifically, does the program: 3.4.3 Have a clear, research-based vision for the timeframe in which students are expected to acquire English? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 10 of30

Dimension 2: Instruction 3. Is there a program in place to help ELs learn English so that they may eventually participate in mainstream content classes without linguistic support? 3.4.3.1 Does this vision appropriately differentiate for variables such as age, native language proficiency, formal education background, etc., that may affect the rate at which different students acquire English? 3.5 Is there a process for ensuring that students whose parents waive their right to services receive linguistic support in mainstream classes? Overall rating for Question 3: Fully Implemented Partially Implemented Not Implemented edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 11 of30

Dimension 2: Instruction 4. Is there a system in place to ensure that staff are adequately qualified to assist ELs with becoming proficient in English and experiencing success in academic content classes? 4.1. Do teachers within the language instruction program(s) have the appropriate qualifications? 4.1.1 Are teachers who deliver instruction in students native language fluent in the language of instruction? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 12 of30

Dimension 2: Instruction 4. Is there a system in place to ensure that staff are adequately qualified to assist ELs with becoming proficient in English and experiencing success in academic content classes? 4.1.2 Are teachers who deliver ESL instruction licensed with a state certification or other endorsement? 4.1.3 If teachers within the language instruction program are also teaching academic content courses (English, mathematics, science, history/social science), do they have a state endorsement or certification in the content course? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 13 of30

Dimension 2: Instruction 4. Is there a system in place to ensure that staff are adequately qualified to assist ELs with becoming proficient in English and experiencing success in academic content classes? 4.2 Do all teachers with ELs in their classes (content or language instruction) understand their responsibility to ensure these students can access their instruction? 4.3 Do all teachers receive professional development for learning and implementing best practices for instruction for ELs? Overall rating for Question 4: Fully Implemented Partially Implemented Not Implemented edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 14 of30

Dimension 3: Assessment 5. Is there a standardized English Language Proficiency Assessment (ELPA) in place to determine whether ELs are making progress in learning English and exiting the language program in a reasonable timeframe? 5.1. Do all ELs in all grade-levels (K-12) take the ELPA on an annual basis, as required by federal law? 5.2 Do all persons involved with the administration (and scoring, if applicable) of the ELPA receive adequate training? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 15 of30

Dimension 3: Assessment 5. Is there a standardized English Language Proficiency Assessment (ELPA) in place to determine whether ELs are making progress in learning English and exiting the language program in a reasonable timeframe? 5.3 What evidence is there that ELPA scores accurately reflect students proficiency in English? 5.4 Does the ELPA and information from ELPA scores adequately determine whether: 5.4.1 ELs are acquiring English language skills at a pace that is consistent with the program goals? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 16 of30

Dimension 3: Assessment 5. Is there a standardized English Language Proficiency Assessment (ELPA) in place to determine whether ELs are making progress in learning English and exiting the language program in a reasonable timeframe? 5.4 Does the ELPA and information from ELPA scores adequately determine whether: 5.4.2 ELs are receiving instruction in both English language development and the language of academic content? 5.5 Is a system in place to share EL performance results across schools, districts, and states if students transfer? Overall rating for Question 5: Fully Implemented Partially Implemented Not Implemented edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 17 of30

Dimension 3: Assessment 6. Is there a system in place to ensure that parents or guardians of ELs are informed of their child s progress in learning English on the ELPA as well as their performance on the statewide academic content assessments? 6.1. Is the information provided to parents or guardians in a language they can understand? 6.2. Are allowances made for parent or guardians who may not be literate in English or their native language? Overall rating for Question 6: Fully Implemented Partially Implemented Not Implemented edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 18 of30

Dimension 4: Exit and Redesignation 7. Is there a process in place for transitioning ELs out of the language instructional program? 7.1. Are parents, teachers, and other appropriate staff involved in the process? 7.2 What criteria have been established for program exit? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 19 of30

Dimension 4: Exit and Redesignation 7. Is there a process in place for transitioning ELs out of the language instructional program? 7.3 What documentation and records are maintained for program exit? Overall rating for Question 7: Fully Implemented Partially Implemented Not Implemented edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 20 of30

Dimension 4: Exit and Redesignation 8. Is there a system in place to monitor the performance of former ELs to ensure that their English skills are sufficient for them to perform successfully in regular classes? 8.1. How are former ELs performing compared to other students? Is there a disparity or gap? 8.2 Are multiple measures used to assess the overall performance of former ELs such as review of grades, meeting promotion and graduation requirements, parent/teacher feedback as well as standardized test results? Overall rating for Question 8: Fully Implemented Partially Implemented Not Implemented edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 21 of30

Dimension 5: Equity and Access 9. Is there a system in place to ensure that ELs have access to, and are participating in, the same programs and services as all other students? 9.1. Are ELs enrolled in advanced courses? 9.2 Are ELs participating in gifted and talented programs? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 22 of30

Dimension 5: Equity and Access 9. Is there a system in place to ensure that ELs have access to, and are participating in, the same programs and services as all other students? 9.3 If needed, are ELs participating in special education programs? 9.4 Are ELs participating in extracurricular programs such as sports, clubs, band, orchestra, chorus, school government, the newspaper, the yearbook, etc.? Overall rating for Question 9: Fully Implemented Partially Implemented Not Implemented edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 23 of30

Dimension 5: Equity and Access 10. Is there a system in place to support ELs in graduating from high school and accessing post-secondary options? 10.1 Are ELs graduating at similar rates as all other students? 10.2 What is being done to ensure that ELs are not dropping out of school? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 24 of30

Dimension 5: Equity and Access 10. Is there a system in place to support ELs in graduating from high school and accessing post-secondary options? 10.3 How are transcripts evaluated and credits awarded for secondary work completed in other countries? 10.4 Are supports in place to assist ELs with applying to college, technical training, or other post-secondary options? Overall rating for Question 10: Fully Implemented Partially Implemented Not Implemented edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 25 of30

Dimension 5: Equity and Access 11. Is there a system in place to ensure that parents or guardians of ELs are involved in the program planning process? 11.1 What type of outreach efforts are conducted to ensure that parents are involved in planning? 11.1.1 Are parents or guardians of ELs involved in state, district and school committees at the same rate as other stakeholders? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 26 of30

Dimension 5: Equity and Access 11. Is there a system in place to ensure that parents or guardians of ELs are involved in the program planning process? 11.1.2 What method is in place to minimize language barriers, if applicable? Overall rating for Question 11: Fully Implemented Partially Implemented Not Implemented edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 27 of30

Dimension 6: Program Design and Evaluation 12. Is there a system in place to evaluate the effectiveness of the program? 12.1 Does the program have clearly defined goals by which to measure whether or not it is working? 12.2 How are program goals evaluated? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 28 of30

Dimension 6: Program Design and Evaluation 12. Is there a system in place to evaluate the effectiveness of the program? 12.3 Can it be shown that the program is being implemented with sufficient resources to ensure it is functioning as intended? 12.4 What is considered a reasonable amount of time for ELs to learn English? Does it differ by age, grade, time in program? edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 29 of30

Dimension 6: Program Design and Evaluation 12. Is there a system in place to evaluate the effectiveness of the program? 12.4.1 Is this estimation based on scientifically based evidence? 12.5 What is the process for changing the program if it is found not to be effective? Overall rating for Question 12: Fully Implemented Partially Implemented Not Implemented edcount, LLC Diagnostic Tool: EL Services Page 30 of30

Areas of Strength: Areas for Improvement: Next Steps: edcount, LLC