ONTARIO FOOD COLLABORATIVE

Similar documents
Triple P Ontario Network Peaks and Valleys of Implementation HFCC Feb. 4, 2016

THE 2016 FORUM ON ACCREDITATION August 17-18, 2016, Toronto, ON

State Parental Involvement Plan

Student Experience Strategy

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

Developing Regional Work-Based Learning

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

CPTED Ontario Newsletter

A Framework for Articulating New Library Roles

ADDIE: A systematic methodology for instructional design that includes five phases: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation.

SSTATE SYSIP STEMIC IMPROVEMENT PL A N APRIL 2016

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Self-archived version. Citation:

University of Toronto

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

STRATEGIC GROWTH FROM THE BASE OF THE PYRAMID

November 17, 2017 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY. ADDENDUM 3 RFP Digital Integrated Enrollment Support for Students

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Strategic Plan Revised November 2012 Reviewed and Updated July 2014

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Loyalist College Applied Degree Proposal. Name of Institution: Loyalist College of Applied Arts and Technology

Implementing Pilot Early Grade Reading Program in Morocco

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

EOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster

CHESTER FRITZ AUDITORIUM REPORT

Online Master of Business Administration (MBA)

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

POLICE COMMISSIONER. New Rochelle, NY

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

Nine Steps to Building a New Toastmasters Club

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Services for Children and Young People

Improving the impact of development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa through increased UK/Brazil cooperation and partnerships Held in Brasilia

The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate.

STEPS TO EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

CHAPTER 2: COUNTERING FOUR RISKY ASSUMPTIONS

Annex 4 University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Tap vs. Bottled Water

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Practice Learning Handbook

STABILISATION AND PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN NAB

Education and Training Committee, 19 November Standards of conduct, performance and ethics communications plan

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

DICE - Final Report. Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Kentucky Last Updated: May 2013

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

Digital Media Literacy

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

Center for Higher Education

No educational system is better than its teachers

February 16. Save $30 on Registration: Designed for Managers and Staff of After School Programs. Early Bird Deadline: January 26, 2017

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Section 1: Program Design and Curriculum Planning

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Practice Learning Handbook

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

Educational Resources. National Council or Teachers of English NCTE and Conference of English Leadership CEL

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

University Assessment Council Minutes Erickson Board Room September 12, 2016 Louis Slimak

POST-16 LEVEL 1 DIPLOMA (Pilot) Specification for teaching from September 2013

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

University of Toronto

Educational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Evidence into Practice: An International Perspective. CMHO Conference, Toronto, November 2008

Section 3.4. Logframe Module. This module will help you understand and use the logical framework in project design and proposal writing.

Corporate learning: Blurring boundaries and breaking barriers

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Marketing Management

Guidelines for Completion of an Application for Temporary Licence under Section 24 of the Architects Act R.S.O. 1990

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Developing, Supporting, and Sustaining Future Ready Learning

Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech

CCC Online Education Initiative and Canvas. November 3, 2015

Managing Printing Services

Copyright Corwin 2015

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

5.7 Course Descriptions

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

CPKN EARNS SILVER AT GTEC

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Transcription:

ONTARIO FOOD COLLABORATIVE Strategic Plan 2016-2018

Table of Contents Introduction and Background... 3 Collaborative Members... 3 Vision and Mission... 3 Statement of Core Principles... 3 Collaborative Objectives and Core Strategies... 4 Intermediate Outcomes: Targets for 2016-2018... 5 Long Term Outcomes 2018 and Beyond... 6 Appendix A: Founding Members... 7 Appendix B: Strategic Planning and Collaborative Development... 8 Appendix C: Working Groups and Activity Plans 2016-17... 9

Introduction and Background The Ontario Food Collaborative was launched at a meeting convened by the Regional Municipality of York in November 2014. Thirty nine participating leaders from across the food system expressed a keen interest in the potential for taking joint action to decrease wasted food at the residential level through public education and shared messaging. The Collaborative has a unique focus; that is, on the link between post consumer food waste reduction and healthy eating attitudes and behaviours. This is the first strategic plan for the Ontario Food Collaborative for the period of 2016-2018. Vision and Mission VISION All Ontarians eat well and no food is wasted. Collaborative Members Core organizations that have been actively engaged throughout 2015 are: City of London City of Toronto County of Simcoe Durham Region Halton Region Middlesex-London Health Unit Regional Municipality of York Niagara Region Province of Ontario (OMAFRA) Provision Coalition Region of Peel Sustain Ontario University of Guelph York Region Food Network A list of these founding members and their representatives is found in Appendix A. MISSION The Ontario Food Collaborative will bring together stakeholders to take a holistic food systems approach in supporting individuals and families to eat well and reduce food waste. STATEMENT OF CORE PRINCIPLES 1. The Collaborative strives to be a multi-stakeholder group representing diverse food system stakeholders. 2. Collaborative members are committed to reducing food waste, promoting healthy eating, and improving the systems of support to positively affect these changes. 3. The Collaborative recognizes the important role of key food system stakeholders in encouraging and supporting decreased food waste and healthy and food choices by consumers and seeks to engage these stakeholders in the work of the Collaborative. 4. Shared leadership, collaboration and learning are core to achieving the mutually agreed upon objectives of the group. Collaborative members will share information, effective practices, resources, programs and work together on pilot projects where appropriate. Ontario Food Collaborative 5

Collaborative Objectives and Core Strategies The objectives and strategies that will shape activities for the Collaborative and its Working Groups from 2016 2018 are outlined below. Detail on actions planned for the first year of implementation is included in Appendix C. 1. To develop a multi-stakeholder collaborative committed to food waste reduction and healthy eating by: a. Building Relationships and Engaging Key Stakeholders b. Ensuring Effective Internal and External Communication c. Providing Planning and Operational Support d. Engaging with Policy Makers and Identifying Policy Change Opportunities e. Documenting Outcomes and Successes 2. To engage value chain stakeholders in partnerships and opportunities that are mutually beneficial and support the vision of the Collaborative by: a. Researching and Mapping Value Chain Stakeholders b. Identifying Strategic Partnerships and Pilots Across the Value Chain 3. To educate and empower citizens through collaborative cross-promotion of food waste reduction and healthy eating strategies by: a. Researching and Documenting Promising Practices b. Sharing Information on Promising Practices with Key Audiences c. Creating Collaborative Messaging Opportunities 4. To build consensus around categories, and act as a clearinghouse, for data and methodologies to measure food waste, healthy eating and contributing factors by: a. Sharing Information across Municipality on Food Waste and Healthy Eating Metrics b. Creating a Platform for Data Hosting c. Engaging in Municipal Pilot Projects for Data Collection and Sharing d. Identifying and Capitalizing on Research Partnerships 6 Strategic Plan 2016-2018

Intermediate Outcomes: Targets for 2016-2018 An Effective Collaborative Membership is diverse and reflects a balance of groups and individuals committed to food waste reduction and healthy eating Members are actively engaged and benefit from the added value of belonging to the collaborative A platform for communication with members and other stakeholders is in place Policy makers are engaged and understand how their portfolios link to food waste reduction and healthy eating issues Effective Partnerships Stakeholders across the value chain share effective practices on food waste and health eating Consumer-focused food waste pilot projects are implemented with diverse food system stakeholders Effective Messaging Promising practices in food waste reduction and healthy eating are documented and shared Collaborative partners are sharing and using common messaging and objectives Effective Metrics A culture of collaboration exists among municipalities and a common platform is available to input and share data in common Members are aggregating, using, sharing and comparing data Research partnerships are initiated Ontario Food Collaborative 7

Long Term Outcomes 2018 and Beyond 8 Strategic Plan 2016-2018 An Effective Collaborative The collaborative will be recognized as a collective and influential voice on issues of food waste reduction and healthy eating Key audiences will have a broader awareness of the issues related to food waste and healthy eating The collaborative is seen as an idea lab and source of innovative information and effective practice There is a clear case for policy change based on collective practice and common data Policy changes will result in reduced food waste and positively impact contributing factors related to healthy eating Effective Partnerships Key stakehollders across the value chain will be actively engaged in the Collaborative There will be alignment of food waste and healthy eating work across municipalities and stakeholders Value chain stakeholders will achieve triple bottom line benefits Members will meet food waste reduction and health related goals There will be stronger local food systems Effective Messaging Common messaging will be created using shared approaches to data collection Common messaging will influence promotion strategies and outcomes across food system stakeholders The value of food and food waste will be redefined Consumers will improve their health, save money on food and municipal infrastructure, and reduce food waste Effective Metrics There will be greater consistency in definitions and data collection approaches Stakeholders will have greater confidence in the data Municipalities will have the capacity to compare and adapt practice based on data There will be greater understanding of the links between healthy eating and food waste reduction New links will be made using data and research to make the case for food waste reduction and healthy eating

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Founding Members CITY OF LONDON Anne Boyd CITY OF TORONTO Charlotte Ueta COUNTY OF SIMCOE Willma Bureau DURHAM REGION Kristy Brooks HALTON REGION Nicole Watt Shirley McLean Jessica MacKay MIDDLESEX-LONDON HEALTH UNIT Ellen Lakusiak REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Tracey Carrigan Lindsay Milne Vicki Puterbough Julie Hordowick Becky Hester Candice Einstoss Rita Foscarini NIAGARA REGION Sherri Tait Kim Ouelette PROVINCE OF ONTARIO (OMAFRA) Don Mills PROVISION COALITION Meena Hassanali REGION OF PEEL Erwin Pascual Karyn Hogan Sahra Nalayeh SUSTAIN ONTARIO Phil Groff UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH Kate Parizeau YORK REGION FOOD NETWORK Joan Stonehocker Ontario Food Collaborative 11

Appendix B: Strategic Planning and Collaborative Development COLLABORATIVE FORMATION An initial meeting of key stakeholders was convened by the Regional Municipality of York in November 2014 resulting in a decision to proceed with the development of the Collaborative OUTCOMES MAPPING AND COLLABORATIVE STRUCTURING A meeting in April 2015 resulted in the following:» Vision and principles documented in 2014 were reviewed and revised» Common interests of founding members and the proposed benefits of the Collaborative were detailed» Working back from benefits and outcomes identified, objectives were articulated into a logic model» A Steering Committee was appointed» Three initial Working Groups were formed (Strategic Messaging, Food System Stakeholders, and Metrics and Indicators)» Templates were developed for Working Group and Steering Committee terms of references, action planning and reporting STEERING GROUP AND WORKING GROUP ACTION PLANNING From April through September 2015, the Steering Committee and Working Groups were convened in conference calls to develop their Terms of References and action plans An accountability structure for communication across Working Groups was created Leads for each Working Group and a liaison to each on the Steering Committee were assigned The Collaborative logic model was further refined STRATEGIC PLANNING A draft Strategic Plan and Member Agreement was drafted in Fall 2015 In January 2016 the Collaborative met to map food system stakeholders and potential partnerships and discuss definitions of food waste Strategic plan was presented and approved by the Collaborative A draft Member Agreement was reviewed OPERATIONALIZING THE PLAN In 2016 2017, the Steering Committee and Collaborative Working Groups will be self managed Administrative support will be provided by the Regional Municipality of York, with co-ordination through the Steering Committee, and in-kind leadership and resources contributed by other Collaborative members An information sharing platform will be developed to facilitate communication among members A meeting of the Collaborative is planned fall 2016 to assess progress on the plan 12 Strategic Plan 2016-2018

Appendix C: Working Groups and Activity Plans 2016-17 STEERING COMMITTEE Immediate Actions 6 Months 1. Establish protocol for Steering Committee meetings (technology platform, timing, etc.) 2. Confirm core foundational documents a. Vision, mission and principles done b. Complete strategic plan 3. Develop branding a. Research on names, brand, logo etc. b. Seek buy in from larger Collaborative for branding 4. Confirm structure for the Collaborative a. Confirm Working Groups and leads done b. Define Collaborative membership levels and benefits c. Identify roles, expectations, commitment, resources d. Create and seek buy in to Memorandum of Understanding e. Confirm Terms of Reference for Collaborative and Working Groups f. Identify where Research/Analysis fits within larger Collaborative 5. Establish approach to monitoring and communicating around work of Working Groups done 6. Represent Collaborative at key meetings and conferences 7. Invite and engage new stakeholders/members as needed 8. Manage and monitor resource inputs to Collaborative project management Actions 2016-2017 1. Identify resources and seek buy in to resource Collaborative from 2016 2018 2. Develop and implement Communication Plan a. Determine and seek agreement on core messages to represent Collaborative to external groups/constituencies b. Research and recommendations on approaches and platforms for internal information sharing/communication; seek buy in from Collaborative 3. Represent Collaborative at key meetings and conferences 4. Invite and engage new stakeholders/members as needed 5. Continue to monitor and communicate around work of Working Groups 6. Manage and monitor resource inputs to Collaborative Ontario Food Collaborative 13

FOOD SYSTEM STAKEHOLDERS WORKING GROUP Immediate Action 6 Months 1. Develop criteria for identifying stakeholders 2. Identify and scope stakeholders 3. Leverage Collaborative member relationships with value chain organizations 4. Work with Metrics and Indicators Working Groups and Steering Committee in establishing a definition for food waste to be used for the Collaborative Actions 2016-2017 1. Continue to map the Who s Who of value chain stakeholders involved in food waste reduction initiatives 2. Create list of organizations whose goals align with that of the Collaborative 3. Develop a sell sheet of why organizations should be involved in conjunction with the steering working group; What s in Healthy Food/Food Waste for all stakeholders 4. Identify and seek synergies with value chain stakeholders 5. Where synergies exist, identify strategic partnerships and potential pilots STRATEGIC MESSAGING Immediate Action 6 Months 1. Confirm Working Group membership 2. Define roles related to external communication, messaging and information sharing with Steering Committee 3. Research and document promising practices linking healthy eating with food waste reduction among other Collaborative members, other food system stakeholders (with Food System Stakeholder Working Group) in Ontario, and those in other jurisdictions Actions 2016-2017 1. Ensure communication of effective and up to date messaging linking healthy eating with strategies for food waste reduction to Collaborative members and key other stakeholders 2. Clarify target populations and stakeholders 3. Assess indicators of success for common messaging 4. Set up a spreadsheet for those doing work or wanting to do work in common messaging 5. Gather and assess all materials for broader replication 6. Continue to identify, document and share promising practices 7. Develop a plan and approaches for common messaging, using Strategic Framework Analysis and/or other tools 14 Strategic Plan 2016-2018

METRICS AND INDICATORS WORKING GROUP Immediate Actions 6 months 1. Identify and add or replace Working Group members to ensure representation from both food waste and health representatives 2. Convene meeting of public health representatives from Collaborative and other allies (e.g. PHO and Ontario Epidemiologists) to: a. Discuss current data and indicators related to healthy eating and food waste reduction b. Identify where information is documented (at federal, provincial or municipal level) and which municipalities currently have access to what data c. Identify gaps d. Identify other sources of data (e.g. municipal market research) in Ontario and other jurisdictions linking healthy eating to food waste reduction e. Develop recommendations on key healthy eating indicators that might be monitored and shared across municipalities 3. Convene meeting of municipal food waste and research representatives to discuss the definition of food waste (avoidable/unavoidable/possible) to be adopted for the Collaborative and pilot projects (with members of the Food System Stakeholders Group and SC) 4. Plan a scan of municipal food waste and health data collection methods and indicators Actions 2016-2017 1. Identify and agree on a common definition of food waste for further research and data collection 2. Implement and report on the scan of municipal food waste and contributing factors data collection approaches and timelines 3. Identify resources and seek buy in for approaches to sharing/hosting and/or aggregating data 4. Seek buy in and plan a municipal pilot project to collect and contribute baseline data using common measurement approaches and definitions of food waste 5. Identify possibilities for engaging researchers and resourcing a research project with University of Guelph (with Steering Committee) Ontario Food Collaborative 15