STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Similar documents
12-month Enrollment

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Transportation Equity Analysis

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Shelters Elementary School

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Educational Attainment

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

University of Arizona

African American Male Achievement Update

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

2018 Great Ideas Conference SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Shyness and Technology Use in High School Students. Lynne Henderson, Ph. D., Visiting Scholar, Stanford


Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Profile of BC College Transfer Students admitted to the University of Victoria

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH VETERANS SUPPORT CENTER

Raw Data Files Instructions

Australia s tertiary education sector

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Absolute Zero Summative Evaluation

Principal vacancies and appointments

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Cypress College STEM² Program Application

John F. Kennedy Middle School

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

A Diverse Student Body

High School to College

Assessing the Impact of an Academic Recovery Program

Freshman Admission Application 2016

Doctoral Initiative on Minority Attrition and Completion

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

CI at a Glance. ttp://

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

Communities in Schools of Virginia

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Section 1 of 2. Demographics

Organization Profile

Van Andel Education Institute Science Academy Professional Development Allegan June 2015

Best Colleges Main Survey

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Albany Technical College Overview Goals Student Success and Implementation Team Conclusion Next Steps...

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Cooper Upper Elementary School

GradinG SyStem IE-SMU MBA

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Chromatography Syllabus and Course Information 2 Credits Fall 2016

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

History. 344 History. Program Student Learning Outcomes. Faculty and Offices. Degrees Awarded. A.A. Degree: History. College Requirements

SCHOOL. Wake Forest '93. Count

The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound on Postsecondary Outcomes 7-9 Years After Scheduled High School Graduation

46 Children s Defense Fund

User Manual. Understanding ASQ and ASQ PLUS /ASQ PLUS Express and Planning Your Study

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

Transcription:

OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH RESEARCH BRIEF #882 August 2015 STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation By Daniel Berumen, MPA Introduction The current report summarizes the results of the research activities to evaluate the STEM Academy Workshops that were offered during the spring 2015 term at Santa Monica College (SMC). These workshops were held over five consecutive Saturdays and included sessions focused on material related to the college s two specially designated CHEM 10 (Introductory to General Chemistry) sections. Specifically, the workshops included core sessions focusing on chemistry, and additional sessions covering math and counseling topics. SMC designates specific course sections for students who are part of their Adelante, Black Collegians and STEM programs. Of the 64 students enrolled in these sections, 40 participated in the workshops. An additional nine current and prospective SMC students participated. This group included two students who had an official enrollment in non-designated CHEM 10 sections. This brief includes a summary of the results of a survey that was administered to students at the end of the five week workshops and an analysis of the CHEM 10 course outcomes for students in the designated CHEM 10 sections. Survey Results Thirty-six participants completed a 17 item survey at the conclusion of the STEM Academy Workshops. The following tables focus on items that specifically relate to the content provided in the chemistry, math and counseling workshops. Questions related to students demographic background and the structure and delivery of the workshops are included in Appendix A. The first sets of questions require students to indicate the degree to which the workshops they attended increased their understanding of each of the three topics (chemistry, math and counseling). By design, only students who attended at least three sessions for a particular topic provided a response for said topic. Santa Monica College Page 1

Question 1. How much did the Math Workshops increase your understanding of what is required of you to be successful in math coursework? No Increase 1 3.8% Slight Increase 3 11.5% Moderate Increase 14 53.8% Substantial Increase 8 30.8% Total 26 100% Question 2. How much did the Counseling Workshops increase your understanding of what is required of you to be successful in college? No Increase 1 3.7% Slight Increase 4 14.8% Moderate Increase 9 33.3% Substantial Increase 13 48.1% Total 27 100% Question 3. How much did the Chemistry Workshops increase your understanding of what is required of you to be successful in chemistry coursework? No Increase 2 6.9% Slight Increase 2 6.9% Moderate Increase 5 17.2% Substantial Increase 20 69.0% Total 29 100% The majority of students who responded to each prompt noted that the workshops either moderately increased or substantially increased their understanding of each topic. Only 30.8% of students who responded noted that the math workshops substantially increased their understanding of math coursework. This was lower than the rate for counseling and chemistry (48.1% and 69.0%, respectively). The second set of questions asked students to identify how useful, or not useful, they found the different workshops. Students were allowed to provide comments that explained their answers. Tables are included that summarize the general topics students addressed in their comments. Not all students provided comments, and some students included multiple topics in their comments. Santa Monica College Page 2

Question 4. Overall, how useful or not useful did you find the Math Workshops? Please explain: Not at All Useful 1 3.6% Slightly Useful 3 10.7% Somewhat Useful 9 32.1% Very Useful 15 53.6% Grand Total 28 100.0% Summary of Topics Addressed Count Provided a better understanding of math concepts 7 Good refresher 6 Did not cover material at my math level 5 Learned new methods 1 Needed more tutor time 1 Instructor "not into it" 1 Total 21 The majority of students found the math workshops to be somewhat useful or very useful (85.7%). In their comments, students noted that the workshops provided them with a better understanding of different math concepts, with six instances of students noting that these sessions provided a good refresher. There were five instances of students noting that the workshops did not cover material at their math level, indicating that they would have liked to have more advanced math topics be covered. Question 5. Overall, how useful or not useful did you find the Counseling Workshops? Please explain: Not at All Useful 1 3.6% Slightly Useful 2 7.1% Somewhat Useful 8 28.6% Very Useful 17 60.7% Grand Total 28 100.0% Summary of Topics Addressed Provided "insight or "important information" on personal growth/development 10 Workshops provided information on specific resources available 7 Review/had previously received information 3 Need "more time management tools" 1 Total 21 Santa Monica College Page 3

Once again the majority of students found the workshops to be somewhat useful or very useful (89.3%). A higher percentage of students found the counseling workshops to be very useful compared to the responses for the math workshops (60.7% and 53.6%, respectively). Most of the comments noted that the workshops provided students with insightful or important information about what it takes to be a successful student. There were multiple responses noting that students learned about important services that are offered at the college. Question 6. Overall, how useful or not useful did you find the Chemistry Workshops? Please explain: Somewhat Useful 1 3.6% Very Useful 27 96.4% Grand Total 28 100.0% Summary of Topics Addressed Count Provided additional/supplemental information 13 Covered important class topics 6 Found assessments useful 2 Want less group work 1 Want more group work 1 Inspirational 1 Total 24 About 96% of respondents found the chemistry workshops to be very useful, and only one student responded that it was somewhat useful. The responses indicate that students found the chemistry workshops to be more useful than either the counseling or math workshops. In their comments, students noted that the workshops provided additional or supplemental information for their CHEM 10 class. Additionally, students noted that covering important topics from class was also useful. CHEM 10 Outcomes The following section contains the CHEM 10 outcomes for students who participated in the STEM Academy Workshops. Success and GPA by Cohort Success rates are calculated by taking the number of A, B, C and P grades and dividing that number by the total enrollment. Grade point average (GPA) is calculated by assigning a numerical value to A, B, C, D and F grades from four to zero, respectively. SMC designates specific courses for their Adelante, Black Collegians and STEM programs. In the following tables the Attended cohort will include students who were officially enrolled in these sections and attended at least one workshop. For comparison, the tables include students in the two Santa Monica College Page 4

designated CHEM 10 sections that did not participate in any sessions of the workshops and all other spring 2015 CHEM 10 students. Additionally, students enrolled in the same Adelante, Black Collegians and STEM designated CHEM 10 sections during the spring 2014 term are included. The two participating students who enrolled in a different CHEM 10 section are excluded entirely from the tables. Table 1. CHEM 10 Success Rates and GPA Cohort Count Success Rate GPA Attended 40 67.5% 2.50 Did not attend 24 41.7% 2.07 All other Spring 2015 CHEM 10 Students 795 55.5% 2.50 Spring 2014 designated sections 65 43.1% 1.76 Students who participated in the STEM Academy Workshops had a higher success rate in CHEM 10 than students in the designated sections that did not attend any sessions. An independent samples t-test found a statistically significant difference in the success rates of students who attended the workshops and those that did not 1. While the students who attended had a higher GPA than those that did not, there it was not a statistically significant difference. Students who attended the STEM Academy Workshops had a higher success rate and GPA than students in the spring 2014 CHEM 10 courses designated for Adelante, Black Collegians and STEM students. Independent samples t-tests found statistically significant differences between their success rates 2 and GPA 3. The Attended cohort had higher success rates than all other spring 2015 CHEM 10 students, and a similar GPA. An independent-samples t-test was conducted and did not indicate a significant difference between their success rates and GPA. Table 2. CHEM 10 Success Rates and GPA by Gender Did Not All CHEM Spring 2014 Attended Gender Attend 10 Sections Count of Females 25 8 410 35 Success Rate 64.0% 37.5% 49.8% 34.3% GPA 2.24 2.00 2.50 1.57 Count of Males 15 16 385 30 Success Rate 73.3% 43.8% 61.6% 53.3% GPA 2.92 2.10 2.50 1.92 Total 40 24 795 65 Success Rate 67.5% 41.7% 55.5% 43.1% GPA 2.50 2.07 2.50 1.76 1 t(64)=2.06, p=.043, d=.44 2 t(105)=2.51, p=.014, d=.44 3 t(80)=2.85,p=.006, d=.90 Santa Monica College Page 5

The gap between the female and male success rates were lower for students who attended the workshops (9.3%) compared to all other CHEM 10 students and students in the spring 2014 designated sections (11.8% and 19%, respectively) 4. Ethnicity Table 3. CHEM 10 Success Rates and GPA by Ethnicity Did Not Attended Attend All CHEM 10 Spring 2014 Sections Count of Asian/PI Students 3 3 153 7 Success Rate 100.0% 100.0% 69.3% 57.1% GPA 3.33 3.00 2.71 2.00 Count of African-American/Black 8 4 49 Students 11 Success Rate 62.5% 25.0% 40.8% 36.4% GPA 2.50 1.50 2.14 1.22 Count of Hispanic/Latino Students 20 9 325 38 Success Rate 60.0% 11.1% 38.5% 34.2% GPA 2.21 1.00 2.04 1.63 Count of White Students 7 5 206 8 Success Rate 85.7% 80.0% 70.9% 75.0% GPA 3.00 2.75 2.86 2.71 Total* 40 24 795 65 Success Rate 67.5% 41.7% 55.5% 43.1% GPA 2.50 2.07 2.50 1.76 *Includes students reported as Native American, Two or more and Unknown African-American/Black and Hispanic/Latino students who participated in the workshops had higher success rates and GPAs than students in the other three cohorts. It should be noted that the number of students in the Attended cohorts are small (all less than 25). The following table contains students success rates and GPA by the number of Chemistry sessions that they attended. Students had the opportunity to attend up to 5 sessions. Table 4. CHEM 10 Success Rates and GPA by Chemistry Sessions Number of Success Count Sessions Rate GPA 1 3 33.3% 3.00 2 6 66.7% 3.00 3 6 83.3% 2.60 4 9 66.7% 2.29 5 18 66.7% 2.35 Total 42 66.7% 2.49 4 Equity Ratios for gender and ethnicity by CHEM 10 outcomes are available in Appendix B. Santa Monica College Page 6

An increase in the number of sessions that students attended did not have a significant relationship with an increase in their CHEM 10 success rates and GPA. CHEM 10 In-Class Assessments The following tables contain scores students enrolled in the designated CHEM 10 sections received for their in-class assessments. These assessments included seven in-class quiz scores, and three in-class test scores. These assessments make up about 30% of the final course grade 5. Students who withdrew from the class, and therefore did not complete all assessments, are excluded from the tables 6. Table 5. Cumulative Quiz and Test Scores by Cohort Average Average Average Count Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cohort Quiz Score Tests Score Total Attended 35 44.3 217.2 261.5 Did Not Attend 15 41.3 214.5 255.8 Total 50 43.4 216.4 259.8 Students who attended the workshops had slightly higher cumulative quiz and test scores than students who did not attend any workshops. An independent samples t-test did not find any significant difference between the two groups. Table 6. Cumulative Quiz and Test Scores by Cohort and Gender Gender Attended Did Not Attend Count of Females 22 5 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 44.3 45.1 Average Cumulative Test Score 211.5 228.1 Average Cumulative Total 255.8 273.2 Count of Males 13 10 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 44.3 39.4 Average Cumulative Test Score 226.9 207.6 Average Cumulative Total 271.2 247.0 Total 35 15 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 44.3 41.3 Average Cumulative Test Score 217.2 214.5 Average Cumulative Total 261.5 255.8 Female students who attended the workshops had a lower cumulative total score than female students who did not attend. It should be noted that the count of students who did not attend the workshop is only five. 5 A course syllabus is available at http://homepage.smc.edu/walker_muriel/syllabus%20chem%2010%20win14.htm 6 Appendix C contains data for all students with available quiz and test data. Santa Monica College Page 7

Table 7. Cumulative Quiz and Test Scores by Cohort and Ethnicity Ethnicity Attended Did Not Attend Count of Asian/PI Students 3 3 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 51.3 47.9 Average Cumulative Test Score 218.9 250.6 Average Cumulative Total 270.2 298.5 Count of African-American/Black Students 6 2 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 44.8 40.9 Average Cumulative Test Score 210.2 193.5 Average Cumulative Total 255.0 234.4 Count of Hispanic/Latino Students 19 4 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 40.8 43.4 Average Cumulative Test Score 210.0 190.8 Average Cumulative Total 250.8 234.2 Count of White Students 6 4 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 51.2 45.6 Average Cumulative Test Score 242.8 235.2 Average Cumulative Total 294.0 280.8 Total* 35 15 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 44.3 41.3 Average Cumulative Test Score 217.2 214.5 Average Cumulative Total 261.5 255.8 *Includes two students reported as Unknown African-American/Black and Hispanic/Latino students who attended workshops had higher cumulative test and quiz scores than students who did not attend any workshops. The count of the Did Not Attend cohorts are small (<5). Santa Monica College Page 8

Summary In total, 49 current and prospective SMC students participated in at least one STEM Academy Workshop. Of those, 40 were enrolled in two specially designated CHEM 10 courses. 69% of survey respondents who attended at least 3 chemistry sessions felt that the workshops "substantially increased their understanding of what is required to be successful in chemistry coursework" 96.4% of survey respondents found the chemistry workshops to be "very useful". This percentage is higher than the responses to the math and counseling workshops (53.6% and 60.7%, respectively) Students who attended the workshops had significantly higher success rates than those students in the same sections that did not attend. Students who attended the workshops had significantly higher success rates and course GPA than students who enrolled in the same sections the previous spring term. A relationship was not found between an increase in the number of sessions attended and an increase in CHEM 10 success rates and GPA. Students who attended the workshops had slightly higher cumulative quiz and test scores than students who did not attend. Santa Monica College Page 9

Appendix A: Survey Results for Student Demographic and Workshop Structure Questions 1. Please indicate your gender: 2. Please indicate your ethnicity: Male 14 38.9% Female 22 61.1% Total 36 100.0% Caucasian/White 8 22.2% American Indian 3 8.3% Asian/Pacific Islander 9 25.0% African American/Black 14 38.9% Latino/Hispanic 2 5.6% Total 36 100.0% 3. Please indicate the highest level of education your parents received: At least one of my parents graduated from a four-year college. 11 30.6% One or both of my parents attended some college or trade school. 12 33.3% Neither of my parents attended any college or trade school. 13 36.1% Total 36 100.0% 4. When do you plan to transfer? Fall 2015/Spring 2016 8 22.9% Fall 2016/Spring 2017 9 25.7% Fall 2017/Spring 2018 18 51.4% Total 35 100.0% Santa Monica College Page 10

5. Please select the Workshop(s) which you participated in at least 3 times (You may check more than one box): Math 25 69.4% Counseling 25 69.4% Chemistry 30 83.3% Total (Unduplicated) 36 100% 6a. Should the duration of breakfast or lunch be lengthened, shortened or stay the same? Breakfast Lunch Lengthened 6 19.4% 14 42.4% Shortened 1 3.2% 0 0.0% Stay the Same 24 77.4% 19 57.6% Total 31 100.0% 33 100% 6b.Should the duration of each program be lengthened, shortened or stay the same? Math Workshops Counseling Chemistry Workshops Workshops Lengthened 7 23.3% 4 12.9% 14 46.7% Shortened 14 46.7% 7 22.6% 1 3.3% Stay the Same 9 30.0% 20 64.5% 15 50.0% Total 30 100.0% 31 100.0% 30 100.0% 7. Should the length of weeks of the STEM Academy be lengthened, shortened, or stay the same? Lengthened 21 65.6% Shortened 1 3.1% Stay the Same 10 31.3% Grand Total 32 100.0% Santa Monica College Page 11

8. Please provide the most valuable aspects of the STEM Academy Workshops. Summary of Topics Addressed Count Tutors and teachers 14 Chemistry help 9 Content 7 Counseling 4 Time and attentiveness 4 Group work/social aspect 4 Resources 1 Math 1 Total 44 9. Please describe aspects of the STEM Academy Workshops that could improve the experience for future students. Summary of Topics Addressed Count More advanced math topics 7 Shorter math sessions 3 More tutor time 3 More group work 3 More advanced chemistry topics 2 Longer sessions/extra days 2 Longer counseling 1 More structure to math 1 Total 22 10. If there is anything not covered by the Workshops that you would have liked to see or experience, please explain. Summary of Topics Addressed Count More advanced math topics 4 More chemistry 3 Longer sessions/extra Days 1 More group work 1 Keep same partners 1 More focused math 1 More activities 1 More counseling info 1 Total 13 Santa Monica College Page 12

11. Why did you decide to attend the STEM Academy? Summary of Topics Addressed Count Extra help 32 Meet others/social aspect 2 SMC experience 2 Friends 1 Professor s suggestion 1 Try new things 1 4-Year college experience 1 Total 40 Santa Monica College Page 13

Appendix B: Equity Ratios by CHEM 10 Completion An equity ratio is calculated by dividing the percentage of a subgroup (ex: female students, white students) that successfully completed an outcome by the percentage of the same subgroup in the initial cohort (outcome percentage/cohort percentage). A ratio of 1.0 indicates that a subgroup is equally represented in the outcome variable when compared with the subgroup s representation in the cohort In this instance, the outcome is CHEM 10 completion, and the cohort is the total number of students enrolled in CHEM 10. Equity ratios are calculated for gender and ethnicity only; the designated CHEM 10 sections did not include veteran students, foster youths, and less than four students with a primary disability. More details about calculating equity ratios can be found on the Institutional Research website 7. 1. CHEM 10 Equity Ratios by Gender Attended Did Not Attend All CHEM 10 Spring 2014 Sections Gender Female 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.80 Male 1.09 1.05 1.11 1.24 Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Count 40 24 795 65 2. CHEM 10 Equity Ratios by Ethnicity Did Not Attended All CHEM 10 Ethnicity Attend Asian/PI 1.48 2.40 1.25 1.33 African- American/Black Spring 2014 Sections 0.93 0.60 0.74 0.84 Hispanic/Latino 0.89 0.27 0.69 0.79 White 1.27 1.92 1.28 1.74 Total* 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Count 40 24 795 65 *Includes students reported as Native American, Two or more and Unknown 7 http://www.smc.edu/enrollmentdevelopment/institutionalresearch/documents/reports/student%20equity/smcstudentequitydata2014.pdf Santa Monica College Page 14

Appendix C: CHEM 10 Quiz and Test Scores (All available students) 1. Cumulative CHEM 10 Test and Quiz Scores by Cohort Count Total Quiz Score Total Tests Score Cohort* Average Average Total Points Average Attended 38 42.3 207.3 249.6 Did Not Attend 19 35.7 185.4 221.0 Total 57 40.1 200.0 240.1 *Includes students that received a W. 2. Cumulative CHEM 10 Test and Quiz Scores by Gender Gender* Attended Did Not Attend Count of Females 24 6 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 42.7 39.8 Average Cumulative Test Score 202.3 201.5 Average Cumulative Total 245.1 241.3 Count of Males 14 13 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 41.5 33.7 Average Cumulative Test Score 215.9 177.9 Average Cumulative Total 257.4 211.7 *Includes students that received a W. 3. Cumulative CHEM 10 Test and Quiz Scores by Ethnicity Ethnicity* Attended Did Not Attend Count of Asian/PI Students 3 3 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 51.3 47.9 Average Cumulative Test Score 218.9 250.6 Average Cumulative Total 270.2 298.5 Count of African-American/Black Students 7 3 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 39.5 33.1 Average Cumulative Test Score 185.5 150.5 Average Cumulative Total 225.1 183.6 Count of Hispanic/Latino Students 19 6 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 40.8 34.8 Average Cumulative Test Score 210.0 159.6 Average Cumulative Total 250.8 194.4 Count of White Students 7 4 Average Cumulative Quiz Score 44.6 45.6 Average Cumulative Test Score 218.5 235.2 Average Cumulative Total 263.1 280.8 *Includes students that received a W. Santa Monica College Page 15