Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Similar documents
National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

2018 Great Ideas Conference SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

2 2.9% % 1 1.4% % 5 7.1% % % % % % 1 1.4% %

Harrassment: offensive, hostile, or intimidating conduct that interfered unreasonably with their ability to work or learn on campus.

Bellevue University Admission Application

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Cooper Upper Elementary School

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

ESL Summer Camp: June 18 July 27, 2012 Homestay Application (Please answer all questions completely)

Arden Middle Secondary Main Report

Shelters Elementary School

Campus Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Cooper Upper Elementary School

2017 TEAM LEADER (TL) NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY UPWARD BOUND and UPWARD BOUND MATH-SCIENCE

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Raw Data Files Instructions

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Communities in Schools of Virginia

University of Arizona

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Diversity Registered Student Organizations

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Division of Student Affairs Annual Report. Office of Multicultural Affairs

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

Transportation Equity Analysis

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes


HIGH SCHOOL PREP PROGRAM APPLICATION For students currently in 7th grade

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

12-month Enrollment

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Multicultural Education: Perspectives and Theory. Multicultural Education by Dr. Chiu, Mei-Wen

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

çääéöé `çñ eìã~åáíáéë

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Please return completed surveys to: Sara Runkel Douglas County OSU Extension Service 1134 SE Douglas Ave. Roseburg, OR 97470

Please complete these two forms, sign them, and return them to us in the enclosed pre paid envelope.

New Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

Revision activity booklet for Paper 1. Topic 1 Studying society

Educational Attainment

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Legislative Counsel Bureau and Nevada Legislature 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV Equal Opportunity Employer

Administrators. in Higher Education Salary Report. Key Findings, Trends, and Comprehensive Tables for the Academic Year

ISSUES IN DIVERSITY AT CHRISTIAN EVANGELICAL HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTES:

Bachelor of Arts in Gender, Sexuality, and Women's Studies

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

Fruitvale Station Shopping Center > Retail

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Level 1 Mathematics and Statistics, 2015

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

The Unequal Distribution of Economic Education: A Report on the Race, Ethnicity, and Gender of Economics Majors at US Colleges and Universities

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Van Andel Education Institute Science Academy Professional Development Allegan June 2015

Course Goals/Learning Objectives Students who successfully complete this course will be able to:

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

The Sarasota County Pre International Baccalaureate International Baccalaureate Programs at Riverview High School

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Emergency Medical Technician Course Application

Principal vacancies and appointments

SCHOLARSHIP/BURSARY APPLICATION FORM

Adver sing 2012 Graduate Survey

Denver Public Schools

Best Colleges Main Survey

Application for Full-Time Freshman Admission

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

User Manual. Understanding ASQ and ASQ PLUS /ASQ PLUS Express and Planning Your Study

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Transcription:

Appendix F Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups Demographic Survey--Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Discussion Group Demographic Survey Faculty with Disabilities Discussion Group

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups What is your sex? male female ****DO NOT WRITE YOUR NAME ON THIS FORM**** [Response to any of these questions is optional] Demographic Information What is your present academic rank? Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Lecturer Instructor Other What is your administrative title? Not Applicable Director, coordinator or administrator of an institute, center, lab, specially-funded program Department Chair Other Racial/Ethnic Group: (Mark all that apply) Caucasian, non-hispanic African American/Black Native American Asian American/Pacific Islander Hispanic Other Are you currently: married unmarried, living with partner single Do you have children? yes no If yes, number of children? What is the department of your current appointment? How long have you been employed at The University of Arizona? How long have you been in your current academic rank? OVER

****DO NOT WRITE YOUR NAME ON THIS FORM**** Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at The University of Arizona: (mark one for each activity) To hire more minority faculty and administrators To develop a sense of community among students and faculty To hire more women faculty and administrators To create a diverse multi-cultural campus environment Below are some statements about The University of Arizona. Indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of the following: (mark one for each item) Faculty of color are treated fairly here. Women faculty are treated fairly here. Men faculty are treated fairly here. Please indicate the extent to which each of the following has been a source of stress for you during the last two years. (mark one for each item) Review/promotion process extensive somewhat not at all Subtle Discrimination (e.g., prejudice, racism, sexism) extensive somewhat not at all Research or publishing demands extensive somewhat not at all OVER

Demographic Survey--Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Discussion Group What is your sex? male female ****DO NOT WRITE YOUR NAME ON THIS FORM**** [Response to any of these questions is optional] Demographic Information What is your present academic rank? Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Lecturer Instructor Other What is your administrative title? Not Applicable Director, coordinator or administrator of an institute, center, lab, specially-funded program Department Chair Other Racial/Ethnic Group: (Mark all that apply) Caucasian, non-hispanic African American/Black Native American Asian American/Pacific Islander Hispanic Other Are you currently: married unmarried, living with partner single Do you have children? yes no If yes, number of children? What is the department of your current appointment? How long have you been employed at The University of Arizona? How long have you been in your current academic rank? OVER

****DO NOT WRITE YOUR NAME ON THIS FORM**** Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at The University of Arizona: (mark one for each activity) To hire more minority faculty and administrators To develop a sense of community among students and faculty To hire more women faculty and administrators To create a diverse multi-cultural campus environment Below are some statements about The University of Arizona. Indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of the following: (mark one for each item) Faculty of color are treated fairly here. Lesbian and gay faculty are treated fairly here. Women faculty are treated fairly here. Men faculty are treated fairly here. Please indicate the extent to which each of the following has been a source of stress for you during the last two years. (mark one for each item) Review/promotion process extensive somewhat not at all Subtle Discrimination (e.g., prejudice, racism, sexism) extensive somewhat not at all Research or publishing demands extensive somewhat not at all OVER

Demographic Survey Faculty with Disabilities Discussion Group What is your sex? male female ****DO NOT WRITE YOUR NAME ON THIS FORM**** [Response to any of these questions is optional] Demographic Information What is your present academic rank? Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Lecturer Instructor Other What is your administrative title? Not Applicable Director, coordinator or administrator of an institute, center, lab, specially-funded program Department Chair Other Racial/Ethnic Group: (Mark all that apply) Caucasian, non-hispanic African American/Black Native American Asian American/Pacific Islander Hispanic Other Are you currently: married unmarried, living with partner single Do you have children? yes no If yes, number of children? What is the department of your current appointment? How long have you been employed at The University of Arizona? How long have you been in your current academic rank? OVER

****DO NOT WRITE YOUR NAME ON THIS FORM**** Indicate how important you believe each priority listed below is at The University of Arizona: (mark one for each activity) To hire more minority faculty and administrators To develop a sense of community among students and faculty To hire more women faculty and administrators To create a diverse multi-cultural campus environment Below are some statements about The University of Arizona. Indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of the following: (mark one for each item) Faculty of color are treated fairly here. Faculty with disabilities are treated fairly here. Women faculty are treated fairly here. Men faculty are treated fairly here. Please indicate the extent to which each of the following has been a source of stress for you during the last two years. (mark one for each item) Review/promotion process extensive somewhat not at all Subtle Discrimination (e.g., prejudice, racism, sexism) extensive somewhat not at all Research or publishing demands extensive somewhat not at all OVER

Appendix G Demographic Responses among Focus Group Participants Institutional Priority Importance among Focus Group Participants Importance of Additional Institutional Priorities among Focus Group Participants Sources of Stress among Focus Group Participants Opinions about Fair Treatment among Focus Group Participants Demographic Responses among Discussion Group Participants Institutional Priority Importance among Discussion Group Participants Importance of Additional Institutional Priorities among Discussion Group Participants Sources of Stress among Discussion Group Participants Opinions about Fair Treatment among Discussion Group Participants

Demographic Responses among Focus Group Participants Demographics GENDER RACE/ETHNICITY RANK ALL WOMEN MEN WHITE FAC OF COLOR NR WOMEN MEN FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER # 138 112 26 101 36 1 30 35 23 24 8 6 6 6 % 100 81.2 18.8 73.2 26.1 0.7 26.8 31.3 20.5 21.4 30.8 23.1 23.1 23.1 # of Years at UA median 10 10 11.5 10 9.5 14.5 11 5 6.5 24.5 21.5 1.8 3.5 mean 11.3 10.7 14.1 11.5 11.3 16.2 11 5.3 8.6 25.8 20.3 2.2 4.1 Marital Status % married 68.4 64.6 84.6 69.6 66.7 63.3 65.7 65.2 62.5 87.5 100 83.3 66.7 % unmarried, living with partner 7.2 6.2 11.5 7.8 5.6 0 11.4 0 12.5 12.5 0 16.7 16.7 % single 23 27.4 3.9 22.6 22.2 33.3 22.9 30.4 25 0 0 0 16.7 % no response 0.7 1.8 0 0 5.6 3.3 0 4.4 0 0 0 0 0 Children % have 64 60.2 80.8 63.7 66.7 63.3 68.6 65.2 41.7 100 100 66.7 50

Institutional Priority Importance among Focus Group Participants How important is each priority at UA? (%) To hire more women faculty and administrators GENDER RACE/ETHNICITY RANK ALL WOMEN MEN WHITE FAC OF COLOR WOMEN MEN FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER highest 16.6 18.6 7.7 13.7 25 23.3 2.9 21.7 25 0 0 0 33.3 high 36.7 35.4 42.3 32.4 47.2 43.3 37.1 30.4 29.2 37.5 33.3 50 50 medium 24.5 24.8 23.1 31.4 5.6 13.3 25.7 26.1 37.5 25 33.3 33.3 0 low 15.8 15.9 15.4 14.7 19.4 10 25.7 17.4 8.3 25 16.7 16.7 0 no response 6.4 5.3 11.5 7.8 2.8 10 5.7 4.4 0 12.5 16.7 0 16.7 median 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2.5 3 mean 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.2 2.6 2.7 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.4 To create a diverse multicultural campus environment highest 20.9 20.4 23.1 13.7 41.7 23.3 11.4 26.1 20.8 25 16.7 0 50 high 35.3 34.5 38.5 37.3 27.8 40 31.4 34.8 33.3 25 33.3 66.7 33.3 medium 29.5 31 23.1 34.3 16.7 23.3 37.1 26.1 37.5 25 16.7 33.3 16.7 low 9.4 9.7 7.7 8.8 11.1 6.7 14.3 8.7 8.3 12.5 16.7 0 0 no response 5 4.4 7.7 5.9 2.8 6.7 5.7 4.4 0 12.5 16.7 0 0 median 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3.5 mean 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 3 2.9 2.4 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.7 3.3

Importance of Additional Institutional Priorities among Focus Group Participants How important is each priority at UA? (%) To hire more minority faculty and administrators GENDER RACE/ETHNICITY RANK ALL WOMEN MEN WHITE FAC OF COLOR WOMEN MEN FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER highest 10.1 9.7 11.5 4.9 25 16.7 2.9 13 8.3 12.5 0 0 33.3 high 36 37.2 30.8 35.3 36.1 43.3 28.6 30.4 45.8 37.5 33.3 33.3 16.7 medium 32.4 32.7 30.8 37.3 19.4 23.3 42.9 30.4 33.3 12.5 33.3 50 33.3 low 15.1 15 15.4 14.7 16.7 6.7 20 21.7 12.5 25 16.7 16.7 0 no response 6.5 5.3 11.5 7.8 2.8 10 5.7 4.4 0 12.5 16.7 0 16.7 median 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 mean 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.7 2.8 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.2 3 To develop a sense of community among students and faculty highest 26..6 27.4 23.1 21.6 41.7 40 20 30.4 20.8 37.5 33.3 0 16.7 high 35.3 32.7 46.2 35.3 33.3 16.7 31.4 30.4 54.2 25 33.3 66.7 66.7 medium 25.2 25.7 23.1 28.4 16.7 30 34.3 26.1 8.3 25 16.7 33.3 16.7 low 7.9 9.7 0 9.8 2.8 33.3 11.4 8.7 16.7 0 0 0 0 no response 5 4.4 7.7 4.9 5.6 10 2.9 4.4 0 12.5 16.7 0 0 median 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 mean 2.8 2.8 3 2.7 3.2 3 2.6 2.9 2.8 3.1 3.2 2.7 3

Sources of Stress among Focus Group Participants To what extent is each of the following a source of stress to you during the last 2 years? (%) Review/promotion process GENDER RACE/ETHNICITY RANK ALL WOMEN MEN WHITE FAC OF COLOR WOMEN MEN FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER extensive 30.2 31.9 23.1 31.4 27.8 16.7 48.6 26.1 29.2 0 33.3 50 16.7 somewhat 38.9 36.3 50 37.3 41.7 23.3 28.6 65.2 37.5 75 33.3 33.3 50 not at all 25.9 26.6 23.1 26.5 25 53.3 17.1 4.4 29.2 12.5 33.3 16.7 33.3 no response 5 5.3 3.9 4.9 5.6 6.7 5.7 4.4 4.2 12.5 0 0 0 median 2 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 2.5 2 mean 2 2.1 2 2 2 1.6 2.3 2.2 2 1.9 2 2.3 1.8 Subtle Discrimination (e.g., prejudice, racism, sexism) extensive 22.3 23.9 15.4 17.7 36.1 30 28.6 13 16.7 37.5 0 0 16.7 somewhat 36 41.6 7.7 35.3 36.1 33.3 40 52.2 45.8 0 16.7 0 33.3 not at all 37.4 30.1 69.2 42.2 25 30 25.7 30.4 37.5 50 83.3 100 50 no response 4.3 4.4 3.9 4.9 2.8 6.7 5.7 4.4 0 12.5 0 0 0 median 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1.5 mean 1.8 1.9 1.4 1.7 2.1 2 2 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.2 1 1.7 Research or publishing demands extensive 31.7 34.5 19.2 32.4 30.6 20 51.4 39.1 20.8 25 16.7 33.3 0 somewhat 48.2 45.1 61.5 47.1 50 46.7 40 43.5 54.2 62.5 33.3 66.7 83.3 not at all 16.6 16.8 15.4 16.7 16.7 26.7 5.7 13 25 0 50 0 16.7 no response 3.6 3.5 3.9 3.9 2.8 6.7 2.9 4.4 0 12.5 0 0 0 median 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 mean 2.2 2.2 2 2.2 2.1 1.9 2.5 2.3 2 2.3 1.7 2.3 1.8

Opinions about Fair Treatment among Focus Group Participants To what extent to you agree or disagree with each statement about UA? (%) Faculty of color are treated fairly here GENDER RACE/ETHNICITY RANK ALL WOMEN MEN WHITE FAC OF COLOR WOMEN MEN FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER agree strongly 10.1 8 19.2 11.8 5.6 10 8.6 4.4 8.3 25 33.3 16.7 0 agree somewhat 41.7 40.7 46.2 42.2 38.9 36.7 28.6 47.8 54.2 37.5 50 50 50 disagree somewhat 27.3 30.1 15.4 23.5 38.9 33.3 34.3 34.8 16.7 25 0 16.7 16.7 disagree strongly 4.3 5.3 0 2 11.1 3.3 5.7 4.4 8.3 0 0 0 0 no response 16.6 15.9 19.2 20.6 5.6 16.7 22.9 8.7 12.5 12.5 16.7 16.7 33.3 median 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 mean 2.7 2.6 3 2.8 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.7 3 3.4 3 2.8 Women faculty are treated fairly here agree strongly 9.4 5.3 26.9 10.8 2.8 10 5.7 4.4 0 25 50 33.3 0 agree somewhat 38.9 35.4 53.9 37.3 44.4 33.3 28.6 30.4 50 62.5 50 66.7 33.3 disagree somewhat 31.7 37.2 7.7 34.3 25 23.3 45.7 47.8 33.3 0 0 0 33.3 disagree strongly 13 15.9 0 9.8 22.2 26.7 11.4 13 12.5 0 0 0 0 no response 7.2 6.2 11.5 7.8 5.6 6.7 8.6 4.4 4.2 12.5 0 0 33.3 median 3 2 3 3 2.5 2 2 2 3 3 3.5 3 2.5 mean 2.5 2.3 3.2 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 3.3 3.5 3.3 2.5 Men faculty are treated fairly here agree strongly 33.8 34.5 30.8 32.4 36.1 36.7 37.1 21.7 37.5 12.5 50 33.3 33.3 agree somewhat 48.2 46.9 53.9 49 47.2 36.7 42.9 65.2 50 62.5 50 66.7 33.3 disagree somewhat 5.8 6.2 3.9 6.9 2.8 10 5.7 4.4 4.2 12.5 0 0 0 disagree strongly 2.9 3.5 0 2 5.6 6.7 2.9 0 4.2 0 0 0 0 no response 9.4 8.9 11.5 9.8 8.3 10 11.4 8.7 4.2 12.5 0 0 33.3 median 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.5 3 3.5 mean 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.3 3 3.5 3.3 3.5

Demographic Responses among Discussion Group Participants GENDER RACE/ETHNICITY RANK ALL WOMEN MEN NR WHITE FAC OF COLOR NR WOMEN MEN FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER Demographics # 95 82 12 1 74 19 2 19 12 20 31 1 0 1 10 % 100 86.3 12.6 1.1 77.9 20 2.1 23.2 14.6 24.4 37.8 8.3 0 8.3 83.3 # of Years at UA median 9 9 15 10 8.3 12 9.5 3.2 9.3 15 0 2 17 mean 11.3 10.7 16.3 11.4 12 15.7 8.6 6.3 11.2 15 0 2 17.8 Marital Status % married 63.2 64.6 58.3 67.6 52.6 84.2 58.3 45 67.7 100 0 0 60 % unmarried, living with partner 11.6 11 16.7 9.5 21.1 10.5 8.3 25 3.2 0 0 0 20 % single 24.2 24.4 25 23 26.3 5.3 33.3 30 29 0 0 100 20 % no response 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Children % have 66.3 68.3 58.3 66.2 73.7 73.7 58.3 55 77.4 100 0 0 60

Institutional Priority Importance among Discussion Group Participants How important is each priority at UA? (%) To hire more women faculty and administrators GENDER RACE/ETHNICITY RANK* ALL WOMEN MEN WHITE FAC OF COLOR WOMEN FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER highest 22.1 24.4 8.3 24.3 15.8 31.6 8.33 35 19.4 high 30.5 30.5 33.3 35.1 15.8 36.8 41.7 15 32.3 medium 33.7 31.7 41.7 28.4 47.4 26.3 33.3 30 35.5 low 9.5 8.5 16.7 9.5 10.5 5.3 8.3 15 6.5 no response 4.2 4.9 0 2.7 10.5 0 8.3 5 6.5 median 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 mean 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.8 2.4 3 2.6 2.7 2.7 To create a diverse multicultural campus environment highest 24.2 25.6 16.7 21.6 36.8 31.6 16.7 30 22.6 high 44.2 45.1 41.7 48.6 26.3 57.9 58.3 25 45.2 medium 17.9 15.9 33.3 20.3 10.5 0 25 25 16.1 low 10.5 9.8 8.3 8.1 15.8 10.5 0 15 9.7 no response 3.2 3.7 0 1.4 10.5 0 0 5 6.5 median 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 mean 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.9 * Due to cell size, the male responses are not distributed by academic rank (except for the demographic table) in an effort to maintain anonymity.

Importance of Additional Institutional Priorities among Discussion Group Participants GENDER RACE/ETHNICITY RANK* ALL WOMEN MEN WHITE FAC OF COLOR WOMEN FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER How important is each priority at UA? (%) To hire more minority faculty and administrators highest 16.8 18.3 8.3 13.5 31.6 26.3 0 25 16.1 high 37.9 39 33.3 41.9 26.3 52.6 50 30 32.3 medium 27.4 29.3 16.7 31.1 10.5 15.8 25 30 38.7 low 14.7 9.8 41.7 12.2 21.1 5.3 25 10 6.5 no response 3.2 3.7 0 1.4 10.5 0 0 5 6.5 median 3 3 2 3 3 3 2.5 3 3 mean 2.5 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.8 3 2.3 2.7 2.6 To develop a sense of community among students and faculty highest 34.7 37.8 16.7 35.1 31.6 36.8 33.3 30 45.2 high 34.7 34.1 41.7 39.2 21.1 47.4 50 25 25.8 medium 17.9 213.4 41.7 14.9 26.3 10.5 8.3 25 9.7 low 8.4 9.8 0 8.1 10.5 0 8.3 15 12.9 no response 4.2 4.9 0 2.7 10.5 5.3 0 5 6.5 median 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 mean 2.9 3.1 2.8 3 2.8 3.3 3.1 2.7 3.1 * Due to cell size, the male responses are not distributed by academic rank (except for the demographic table) in an effort to maintain anonymity.

Sources of Stress among Discussion Group Participants To what extent is each of the following a source of stress to you during the last 2 years? (%) Review/promotion process GENDER RACE/ETHNICITY RANK* ALL WOMEN MEN WHITE FAC OF COLOR WOMEN FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER extensive 27.4 28 25 24.3 42.1 31.6 33.3 20 29 somewhat 36.8 34.1 50 35.1 42.1 26.3 41.7 45 29 not at all 28.4 29.3 25 35.1 0 36.8 25 25 29 no response 7.4 8.5 0 5.4 15.8 5.3 0 10 12.9 median 2 2 2 2 2.5 2 2 2 2 mean 1.8 2 2 1.9 2.5 1.9 2.1 1.9 2 Subtle Discrimination (e.g., prejudice, racism, sexism) extensive 22.1 24.4 8.3 20.3 31.6 31.6 16.7 40 12.9 somewhat 51.6 54.9 25 51.4 47.4 63.2 66.7 50 48.4 not at all 21.1 14.6 66.7 24.3 10.5 5.3 16.7 0 29 no response 5.3 6.1 0 4.1 10.5 0 0 10 9.7 median 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 mean 1.9 2.1 1.4 2 2.2 2 2 2.4 1.8 Research or publishing demands extensive 35.8 36.6 25 35.1 31.6 47.4 41.7 40 25.8 somewhat 32.6 34.1 25 33.8 31.6 31.6 41.7 50 22.6 not at all 23.2 19.5 50 23 26.3 15.8 16.7 0 35.5 no response 8.4 9.8 0 8.1 10.5 5.3 0 10 16.1 median 2 2 1.5 2 2 2.5 2 2 2 mean 1.9 2.2 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.4 1.9 * Due to cell size, the male responses are not distributed by academic rank (except for the demographic table) in an effort to maintain anonymity.

Opinions about Fair Treatment among Discussion Group Participants GENDER RACE/ETHNICITY RANK* ALL WOMEN MEN WHITE FAC OF COLOR WOMEN FULL ASSOC ASST OTHER To what extent to you agree or disagree with each statement about UA? (%) Faculty of color are treated fairly here agree strongly 7.4 6.1 16.7 8.1 5.3 0 8.3 5 9.7 agree somewhat 36.8 34.1 50 39.2 21.1 47.4 41.7 15 35.5 disagree somewhat 36.8 40.2 16.7 36.5 42.1 36.8 41.7 65 25.8 disagree strongly 6.3 6.1 8.3 5.4 10.5 10.5 0 5 6.5 no response 12.6 13.4 8.3 10.8 21.1 5.3 1 10 22.6 median 2 2 3 3 2 2.5 3 2 3 mean 2.2 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.2 2.6 Women faculty are treated fairly here agree strongly 8.4 4.9 33.3 8.1 10.5 0 8.3 5 6.5 agree somewhat 29.5 26.8 41.7 28.4 26.3 42.1 16.7 20 25.8 disagree somewhat 35.8 37.8 25 36.5 36.8 36.8 50 50 25.8 disagree strongly 21.1 24.4 0 24.3 10.5 21.1 25 20 29 no response 5.3 6.1 0 2.7 15.8 0 0 5 12.9 median 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 mean 2.2 2.1 3.1 2.2 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 Men faculty are treated fairly here agree strongly 47.4 47.6 41.7 51.4 31.6 47.4 58.3 45 45.2 agree somewhat 35.8 34.1 50 36.5 31.6 42.1 33.3 30 32.3 disagree somewhat 7.4 7.3 8.3 5.4 15.8 5.3 8.3 10 6.5 disagree strongly 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 no response 9.5 11 0 6.8 21.1 5.3 0 15 16.1 median 3 4 3 4 3 3.5 4 4 4 mean 3.1 3.5 3.3 3.5 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.5 * Due to cell size, the male responses are not distributed by academic rank (except for the demographic table) in an effort to maintain anonymity.

Opinions about Fair Treatment among Faculty with Disabilities and Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Faculty Discussion Group Participants GENDER RACE/ETHNICITY ALL WOMEN MEN WHITE FAC OF COLOR To what extent to you agree or disagree with each statement about UA? (%) Faculty with disabilities are treated fairly here* agree strongly 20 0 50 0 100 agree somewhat 40 50 50 66.7 0 disagree somewhat 0 0 0 0 0 disagree strongly 20 50 0 33.3 0 median 3 2 3.5 3 4 mean 2.8 2 3.5 2.3 4 Lesbian and gay faculty are treated fairly here** agree strongly 0 0 0 0 0 agree somewhat 3.3 50 0 40 0 disagree somewhat 3.3 25 50 40 0 disagree strongly 3.3 25 50 20 100 median 2 2.5 1.5 2 1 mean 2 2.3 1.5 2.2 1 *only faculty who participated in the Faculty with Disabilities Discussion Group responded to this question **only faculty who participated in the Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Faculty Discussion Group responded to this question