Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Similar documents
Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Shelters Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Educational Attainment

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Bellehaven Elementary

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

John F. Kennedy Middle School

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

12-month Enrollment

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Review of Student Assessment Data

Transportation Equity Analysis

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Best Colleges Main Survey

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

PEIMS Submission 1 list

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

46 Children s Defense Fund

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

El Toro Elementary School

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal


Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

State of New Jersey

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Kahului Elementary School

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Hokulani Elementary School

Common Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Raw Data Files Instructions

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Clark Lane Middle School

University of Arizona

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

Organization Profile

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

African American Male Achievement Update

The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound on Postsecondary Outcomes 7-9 Years After Scheduled High School Graduation

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE READINESS PROGRAMS IN K-12

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

Robert Bennis Elementary School

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON THE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE STUDENTS OPINION ABOUT THE PERSPECTIVE OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND CAREER PROSPECTS

Transcription:

212-213 Report Card for Glenville High School SCHOOL DISTRICT District results under review by the Ohio Department of Education based upon 211 findings by the Auditor of State. Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question How well did students do on the state test? COMPONENT Progress This is your district s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. Did the students get a year s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less? Performance Inde Value Added 54.5%... D Overall...... Indicators Met Gifted...... Students with Disabilities...... Lowest 2% in Achievement... COMPONENT Gap Closing This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, culture or disability? COMPONENT Graduation Rate This grade answers the question How many ninth graders graduate in four years or five years? COMPONENT Annual Measurable Objectives...... Graduation Rates 53.% of students graduated in 4 years... 58.2% of students graduated in 5 years... K-3 Literacy This grade answers the question Are more students learning to read in kindergarten through third grade? The 214 report card will report some results. The report card will display one grade for kindergarten through grade 3. COMPONENT Prepared for Success This grade answers the question Are students who graduate from our district ready for college or a career? There are si ways to show that graduates are prepared. In the 214 school year, the report card will show results for the si areas. The report card will display one grade combining the results of all si ways of showing graduates are prepared. COMPONENT Page 1 of 12

8.4 16.2 19. 31.2 1.5 2.9 6.6 33.7 8.1 1.4. 7.4 17.6 34.6 8.9 7.5 17.8 34.4 9.1 1.7 16.1 27.8 8.7 2. 212-213 Report Card for Glenville High School Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question How well did students do on the state test? COMPONENT D Performance Inde The Performance Inde measures the test results of every student, not just those who score proficient or higher. There are si levels on the inde and districts receive points for every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the more the points awarded in the district's inde. This rewards schools and districts for improving performance. 12 Performance Inde Trend Performance Inde 4 6 2 8 1 Achievement Level Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested Pct of Students. 1.7 7.9 27.8 26.8 35.7. Points for this Level 1.3 1.2 1.1 1..6.3. Points Received. 2. 8.7 27.8 16.1 1.7. 65.4 1 8 6 69.2 68.8.. 7.9 71.9 65.4 54.5% 65.4 of a possible 12. A 9. - 1.% B 8. - 89.9% C 7. - 79.9% D 5. - 69.9%. - 49.9% 1.7 7.9 26.8 Advanced Plus 27.8 Advanced Accelarated Proficient Limited Basic Untested 35.7 4 2 2.4 3.2 29 21 211 212 213 Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested Page 2 of 12

Indicators Met Indicators Met measures how many students have passed the state tests at a minimum level, called proficient, or higher. Test results are reported for each student in a grade and subject. At least 75 percent of students must pass to get credit for the indicator. Starting in the 213-14 school year, a district or school needs to have 8 percent of their students pass at a minimum level or higher in order to meet an indicator. Indicators Met %.%. out of 1. 4 6 A B C D 9. - 1.% 8. - 89.9% 7. - 79.9% 5. - 69.9%. - 49.9% 2 8 1 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Ohio Graduation Test Mathematics 3rd Grade Reading Mathematics 4th This Grade school Readingdoes not have Mathematics enough test results in 3rd, 5th Grade Reading Science 4th, or 5th grade to display this table. Mathematics 6th Grade Reading Mathematics 7th This Grade school Readingdoes not have Mathematics enough test results in 6th, 8th Grade Reading Science 7th, or 8th grade to display this table. OGT, 1th Graders Mathematics Reading Science Social Studies 32.3% 51.2% 23.8% 28.7% Writing 51.2% Mathematics 57.8% Reading 75.% OGT, 11th Graders Science 46.2% Social Studies 6.3% Writing 75.7% Page 3 of 12

Proficiency Percent Comparison by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade 1th Grade OGT 1th Grade OGT 1% 9% 87.6% 84.9% 83.9% 81.1% 8% 77.3% 7% 67.3% 63.1% 6% 56.2% 51.2% 51.2% 5% 48.2% 41.6% 4% 32.3% 3% 28.7% 23.8% 2% Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science School District State Average 1% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 29 21 211 212 213 Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science 11th Grade Cumulative OGT 11th Grade Cumulative OGT 1% 92.9% 92.1% 9% 89.2% 88.2% 79.9% 78.3% 85.1% 8% 75.% 75.7% 7% 69.1% 67.6% 6% 57.8% 6.3% 59.3% 5% 46.2% 4% Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science School District State Average 1% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 29 21 211 212 213 Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science Page 4 of 12

Progress This is your school s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. It answers the question Did the students get a year s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less? COMPONENT Overall This measures the progress for all students in math and reading, grades 4-8. Gifted Students This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading, math, and/or superior cognitive ability. Students in the Lowest 2% in Achievement This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 2% statewide in reading and math achievement. Progress Details This table shows the Progress scores by test grade and subject. No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter ecludes all data. Students with Disabilities This measures the progress for students with disabilities. Coming in 216 High School A High School measure of progress will be implemented in the -16 school year. Although Progress scores are not assigned letter grades at this level of detail, the grading scale applied at the Overall (All Students, All Tests) level is: A 2. and up B 1. to 1.9 C -1. to.9 D -2. to -1.1 below -2. Page 5 of 12

Progress vs. Performance Inde This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's performance inde results (horizontal ais) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical ais). The size of the bubble represents the size of the student subgroup. No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter ecludes all data. A B Grade C D Performance Inde Page 6 of 12

Gap Closing This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, culture or disability? COMPONENT Annual Measurable Objectives Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of all students to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achieves that goal in reading, math and graduation and emphasize any achievement gaps that eist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels. Reading Math Graduation Rate AMO Points 4 6 51.2 32.3 55.8 2 8 1 51.2 32.3 53.1.% A 9. - 1.% B 8. - 89.9% C 7. - 79.9% D 6. - 69.9%. - 59.9% 17.2 51.2 8.6 32.1 53. 53. 2 4 6 8 1 2 4 6 8 1 2 4 6 8 1 All Students African American Econ Disadvantage Students w/ Disab... All Students African American Econ Disadvantage Students w/ Disa... Students w/ Disa... All Students African American Econ Disadvantage The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 213 AMO for Reading is 83.4%, for Math is 78.5%, and for Graduation Rate is 75.9%. Subgroups with fewer than 3 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs. Page 7 of 12

Graduation Rate This grade represents the percentage of students whom entered the 9th grade and graduated 4 and 5 years later. COMPONENT 4-Year Graduation Rate The 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 212 who graduated within four years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 29 and graduated by 212. 4-Year Rate 5-Year Rate 53.% A 93. - 1.% B 89. - 92.9% C 84. - 88.9% D 79. - 83.9%. - 78.9% 2 4 6 8 1 1 8 6 53. 59.3 81.3 1 8 6 58.2 63.3 82.4 5-Year Graduation Rate The 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 211 who graduated within five years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 28 and graduated by 212. 58.2% A 95. - 1.% B 9. - 94.9% C 85. - 89.9% D 8. - 84.9%. - 79.9% 2 4 6 8 1 4 2 School State Average District 4 2 School State Average District Page 8 of 12

Graduation Rate Trend 6% 58% 58.2% 56% 54% 53.% 52% 5% 49.1% 48% 46% 44% 42% 44.1% 43.1% 21 211 212 4 - Year 5 - Year Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because the necessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year. Page 9 of 12

Principal: Address: 65 E 113th St Cleveland OH 4418-263 Phone: (216) 268-6 Directory information current as of the 212-213 Report Card publication date Your School's Students Average Daily Enrollment: 716 Number of Limited English Proficiency Students Ecluded from Accountability Calculations: Enrollment by Subgroup Enrollment # Enrollment % Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic 79 99.% Students with Disabilities 215 3.1% Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficiency Migrant 716 1.% 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group American Indian or Alaska... Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Migrant Economic Disadvantage Limited English Proficiency Page 1 of 12

Mobility Rates by Subgroup Student Mobility % All Students 5.2% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic 5.3% Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities 7.3% Economically Disadvantaged 5.2% Limited English Proficiency Migrant 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Economic Disadvantage Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Students with Disabilities Migrant White, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Multiracial This chart shows the percentage of students who, because they moved into or out of the district, did not spend a majority of the school year within the district. Page 11 of 12

Your School's Teachers Your School's Poverty Status: High Your School Your District Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor's Degree Percentage of teachers with at least a Master's Degree Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes taught by properly certified teachers Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught by teachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure 1. 91.5 6.2 91.7 High-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile or in neither quartile. Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group Wellness and Physical Education The etent to which students are successful in meeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's physical education standards Low Success Page 12 of 12