How Living Costs Undermine Net Price As An Affordability Metric

Similar documents
About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

Trends in College Pricing

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

Financing Education In Minnesota

How Do Colleges Respond to Accountability Pressures? Examining the Relationship between Cohort Default Rates and College Pricing

San Francisco County Weekly Wages

How to Prepare for the Growing Price Tag

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

The Implementation of a Consecutive Giving Recognition Program at the University of Florida

TENNESSEE S ECONOMY: Implications for Economic Development

Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says

CONTRACTS AND GRANTS DIVISION CONTRACTS AND GRANTS DEPARTMENT

Rural Education in Oregon

Understanding University Funding

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

State Budget Update February 2016

COLLEGE ADMISSIONS Spring 2017

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

College Pricing. Ben Johnson. April 30, Abstract. Colleges in the United States price discriminate based on student characteristics

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

An Analysis of the El Reno Area Labor Force

Alex Robinson Financial Aid

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

Measures of the Location of the Data

Options for Updating Wyoming s Regional Cost Adjustment

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

Proficiency Illusion

College Pricing and Income Inequality

Texas A&M University-Texarkana

COLLEGE ACCESS LESSON PLAN AND HANDOUTS

2008 TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS REPORT

Strategic Plan Update, Physics Department May 2010

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

A Comparison of the ERP Offerings of AACSB Accredited Universities Belonging to SAPUA

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

Welcome. Paulo Goes Dean, Eller College of Management Welcome Our region

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Draft Preliminary Master Plan April 18, 2012

Tale of Two Tollands

How to Revitalize Your Financial Aid Compliance

Financial Plan. Operating and Capital. May2010

College Pricing and Income Inequality

Modern Trends in Higher Education Funding. Tilea Doina Maria a, Vasile Bleotu b

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

Estimating the Cost of Meeting Student Performance Standards in the St. Louis Public Schools

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

PENNSYLVANIA. A review of the. for the school year. Department of Education

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

IN-STATE TUITION PETITION INSTRUCTIONS AND DEADLINES Western State Colorado University

Session 2B From understanding perspectives to informing public policy the potential and challenges for Q findings to inform survey design

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS

The Good Judgment Project: A large scale test of different methods of combining expert predictions

Paying for College. Marla Lewis Office of Student Financial Aid

Arkansas Private Option Medicaid expansion is putting state taxpayers on the hook for millions in cost overruns

Youth & Family Services Counseling Center

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Co-op Internship Placements

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement. Oklahoma State University

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS

Student Transportation

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

2015 Educator Workshops

OREGON TECH ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services

SHARIF F. KHAN. June 16, 2015

FINANCING YOUR COLLEGE EDUCATION

Administrators. in Higher Education Salary Report. Key Findings, Trends, and Comprehensive Tables for the Academic Year

Faculty Schedule Preference Survey Results

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

Network Technology/Cisco and Linux Networking Education Report. 5, % $27.63/hr

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

AGS THE GREAT REVIEW GAME FOR PRE-ALGEBRA (CD) CORRELATED TO CALIFORNIA CONTENT STANDARDS

DRAFT VERSION 2, 02/24/12

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

Transcription:

How Living Costs Undermine Net Price As An Affordability Metric Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Asst. Vice President for Institutional Research, Planning & Effectiveness Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum Denver, CO May 29, 2015

OVERVIEW Except for institutions with very few commuters, net price is not a valid measure of affordability because cost of living budgets are determined without sufficient standards and consistency Research partners through Wisconsin HOPE Lab: Robert Kelchen, Seton Hall University Sara Goldrick-Rab, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison

NET PRICE AND COST OF ATTENDANCE CALCULATIONS Tuition Required Fees Books Room & Board* + Other Costs Cost of Attendance * based on living arrangements Cost of Attendance - Grant Aid Net Price

HOW LIVING COSTS ARE DETERMINED Set in a manner determined by the institution (SEC. 472. 20 U.S.C. 1087) Sparse guidance in FSA Handbook: periodic surveys of student population, assessing local housing costs or other pertinent data otherwise reasonable methods NASFAA Monograph

LIVING COSTS AS SHARE OF COA 100 Reported Living Costs as Share of Cost of Attendance Percent 80 60 40 59.1 35.6 70.5 58.8 49.3 50.2 43.5 45.4 47.3 20 0 4-year or above 2-year Less-than 2-year Institutional Level Public Private not-for-profit Private for-profit

APPLICATION OF GRANT AID TO COSTS Grant aid is generally applied First to offset direct costs (tuition and req. fees) Then to offset books, supplies, living expenses Residual net price after application of aid weights cost of living components even more as share of total COA Cost of Attendance Tuition & Required Fees Books Living Expenses Grant Aid Net Price

SELECTED RANKINGS USING NET PRICE Federal Uses: HEOA Watch Lists College Navigator White House Score Card Rating System (?) Selected Ranking Publications: Washington Monthly U.S. News Best Value Colleges Kiplinger s Best Value Colleges

METHODOLOGY Generate county-level estimates of cost-of-living Compare campus-reported costs for living expenses off-campus, not with family to countylevel estimates Results analyzed by sector and geospatially

REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT APPROACH (1) Model approach on the MIT Living Wage Calculator (Glasmeier & Arete, 2014), using data available when 2013-14 COA numbers were developed Adjusted for regional differences using 2013 County Cost of Living Index when needed Room and board: Housing: HUD median rents by county for efficiency apartment without roommates (FY 2012) Food: USDA low-cost food plan (June 2012)

REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT APPROACH (2) Other expenses : Transportation: BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey for individuals under 25 years old (2012) Health care: Average premium by state from the Kaiser Family Foundation national average used if missing data (2010) Miscellaneous: BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey for individuals under 25 years old (2012)

INSTITUTIONAL DATA Primary source: IPEDS IC 2013-14 Selection criteria: Values reported both for Room & board, off-campus not with family Other expenses, off-campus not with family Reporting status differences Academic year reporter values treated a 9 months Program reporters normalized to 9 months Excluded institutions from U.S. Territories

LIMITATIONS Costs are not uniform within counties Urban areas: Gasoline/rent costs vary within small areas Rural areas: Transportation costs vary by distance to college Does not reflect variation in needs within students that can be captured by professional judgments

OVERARCHING FINDINGS Higher cost estimates in urban/rural counties Half of institutions in most expensive quartile of counties Huge institutional variation at county level: 56.4% of institutions within $3,000 of estimate 10.8% of institutions $3,000+ above estimate 32.8% of institutions $3,000+ below estimate

COUNTY-LEVEL ESTIMATES, 9 MONTHS Room & Board Costs Other Costs Housing Food Total Transp. Health Care Misc. Total Total Min 2,862 1,665 4,572 2,061 1,224 621 4,077 9,126 25th pctile 3,969 1,872 5,877 2,331 1,809 702 4,860 10,863 50th pctile 4,662 1,944 6,606 2,421 1,890 729 5,040 11,678 75th pctile 5,623 2,068 7,711 2,565 2,025 774 5,371 12,940 Max 12,051 3,690 15,489 4,590 3,933 1,386 9,189 24,426 Mean 5,040 2,003 7,039 2,490 1,990 753 5,233 12,272 SD 1,572 214 1,719 266 457 80 682 2,213 Source: Kelchen, Hosch & Goldrick-Rab (2014). Table 3.

COUNTY-LEVEL ESTIMATES, 9 MONTHS Avg. Estimated Living.. 9,126 24,856 Source: Kelchen, Hosch & Goldrick-Rab (2014). Table 3.

ESTIMATED LIVING COSTS BY REGION $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 Living Cost Allowances (over 9 months) for Off-Campus Students Not Living with Family, by Region, 2013-14 $0 West Midwest South Northeast Source: Kelchen, Hosch & Goldrick-Rab (2014). Table 2.

Percent REPORTED VS. ESTIMATED LIVING COSTS 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 9.5 7.8 8.1 7.7 71.6 18.9 Public 55.4 60.6 63.2 15.9 11.9 14.0 53.1 58.5 36.8 31.3 29.1 31.0 29.6 Private non-profit Private for-profit Public Private non-profit Private for-profit 40.8 4.5 48.5 45.2 47.0 Public Private non-profit 4-year or above 2-year Less-than 2-year Below Estimate By $3,000+ Above Estimate By $3,000+ Within $3,000 of Estimate 15.8 45.8 38.4 Private for-profit Source: Kelchen, Hosch & Goldrick-Rab (2014). Table 4.

Milwaukee County $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 Comparison of Living Cost Allowances to Estimated 9 Months Living Costs, Denver County, Colorado Estimated Living Cost Room & Board Other

Milwaukee County $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 Comparison of Living Cost Allowances to Estimated 9 Months Living Costs, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania La Salle University Natl Massage T Inst Drexel University Curtis Inst of Music Temple University Jna Inst of Culinary Univ of Sciences Star Career Acad Hussian Sch of Art Penn Acad Fine Arts Prism Career Inst Orleans Tech Inst Moore Coll of Art Saint Joseph's Univ University of Penn Lincoln Tech Inst Philadelphia Univ Restaurant Sch WHC Aviation Inst Maint Empire Beauty Sch Chestnut Hill Coll Univ of the Arts Estimated Living Cost Room & Board Other ITT Technical Inst Kaplan Career Inst Art Inst of Phila. Metro Career Ctr Jean M Aveda Inst Holy Family Univ Comm Coll of Phila Peirce College LT Int Beauty Sch

LIVING COSTS, 9 MONTHS PHILADELPHIA (DETAIL)

Milwaukee County 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 Comparison of Living Cost Allowances to Estimated Living Costs, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin Estimated Living Cost Room & Board Other

Washington, DC 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 Comparison of Living Cost Allowances to Estimated Living Costs, Washington, DC Estimated Living Cost Room & Board Other * No reported data

LIVING COSTS WASHINGTON, DC

RURAL EXAMPLE: SUMTER, SC Cost variation is not limited to urban areas (but easier to observe) 20000 16000 12000 8000 4000 0 Comparison of Living Cost Allowances to Estimated Living Costs, Sumter SC Sumter Beauty Coll U of South Carolina Sumter Central Carolina Tech Coll Morris College Estimated Living Cost Room & Board Other

LIVING COSTS, SUMTER CO., SC Sumter Beauty College 15,705 University of South Carolina-Sumter 13,755 Morris College 8,725 Central Carolina Technical College 11,231 Scale: 2 miles Avg. DiffReportFromEst -3,164 3,816 Sumter County, SC Estimate: $11,889

IMPLICATIONS Net price statistics for institutions with sizeable commuter populations are not necessarily valid across groups Net price should not be used for accountability within broad groups of institutions without correction for living costs Benchmarking activities should examine variation in COA budgets prior to examination of net price

UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES Manipulation of net price to game accountability Subverts transparency agenda Artificial lowering of living costs Incentives to lower living cost budgets may stress students who qualify for less aid

ON-CAMPUS LIVING COSTS BY YEAR 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 Public 4-year Public 2-year Private nonprofit 4,000 2,000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

OFF-CAMPUS LIVING COSTS BY YEAR 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 Public 4-year Public 2-year Private nonprofit For-profit (academic year) For-profit (program) 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

RECOMMENDATIONS (1) 1. Determine living costs at federal level with regional (county) adjustments 2. Failing federal determination, authorize ED to establish rigorous methodology for cost of living budgets 3. Do not include net price in ratings system or 3 rd party rankings, unless statistically adjusted

RECOMMENDATIONS (2) 4. Failing adoption of #1-3, for the purposes of net price calculations, consider using (nearest) campus living costs for off-campus costs 5. Conduct more research on living expenses at different geographic scales, esp. health care 6. Research community should take more active role in examining reliability and validity of prominent educational statistics

RESOURCES & CONTACT INFO Kelchen, R., Hosch, B., Goldrick-Rab, S. The Costs of College Attendance: Trends, Variation, and Accuracy in Institutional Living Cost Allowances. Association of Public Policy and Management (2014). http://wihopelab.com/publications/. http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/irpe/reports/ Braden.Hosch@stonybrook.edu