Student Achievement WTPS Mrs. Cheryl Dyer, Superintendent Dr. Lisa Gleason, Director of Curriculum and Instruction 1

Similar documents
Idaho Public Schools

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

Junior Scheduling Assembly. February 22, 2017

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Shelters Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

World s Best Workforce Plan

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Cooper Upper Elementary School

EDINA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Registration Class of 2020

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

Timeline. Recommendations

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

AB 167/216 Graduation. kids-alliance.org/programs/education. Alliance for Children s Rights

College Entrance Testing:

ADVANCED PLACEMENT STUDENTS IN COLLEGE: AN INVESTIGATION OF COURSE GRADES AT 21 COLLEGES. Rick Morgan Len Ramist

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Engage Educate Empower

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

Clarkstown Central School District. Response to Intervention & Academic Intervention Services District Plan

Kahului Elementary School

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Fashion Design Program Articulation

African American Male Achievement Update

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Have earned IB, AP, A-Level, French Baccalaureate or Equivalent

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Accuplacer Implementation Report Submitted by: Randy Brown, Ph.D. Director Office of Institutional Research Gavilan College May 2012

ONLINE COURSES. Flexibility to Meet Middle and High School Students at Their Point of Need

Geographic Area - Englewood

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

John F. Kennedy Middle School

AIS/RTI Mathematics. Plainview-Old Bethpage

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS A $10.00 fee will be assessed for all computer education classes.

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Testing Schedule. Explained

Hokulani Elementary School

Testing for the Homeschooled High Schooler: SAT, ACT, AP, CLEP, PSAT, SAT II

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Port Jervis City School District Academic Intervention Services (AIS) Plan

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners


K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

INTRODUCTION ( MCPS HS Course Bulletin)

YOUR FUTURE IN IB. Why is the International Baccalaureate a great choice for you? Mrs. Debbie Woolard IB Director Marietta High School

Executive Summary. Hamilton High School

Executive Summary. Osan High School

EGRHS Course Fair. Science & Math AP & IB Courses

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Bachelor of Science. Undergraduate Program. Department of Physics

TREATMENT OF SMC COURSEWORK FOR STUDENTS WITHOUT AN ASSOCIATE OF ARTS

B.S/M.A in Mathematics

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

SER CHANGES~ACCOMMODATIONS PAGES

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

International: Three-Year School Improvement Plan to September 2016 (Year 2)

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

Parent Academy. Common Core & PARCC

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Columbia High School

Course Offerings SUBJECT AND COURSE REQUIREMENTS

Robert Bennis Elementary School

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Georgia Department of Education

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

What We Are Learning about Successful Programs In College Calculus

EAP. updates KHENG WAICHE. early proficiency programs coordinator

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Cuero Independent School District

WELCOME JUNIORS SENIOR YEAR SCHEDULING

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

Executive Summary. Gautier High School

Grade 5 + DIGITAL. EL Strategies. DOK 1-4 RTI Tiers 1-3. Flexible Supplemental K-8 ELA & Math Online & Print

Harmony School of Advancement Harmony Public Schools Course Selection Guide

Strategic Plan Dashboard

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

Geographic Area - Englewood

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO Transfer Credit Agreement Catalog

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

Transcription:

Student Achievement WTPS 2017-2018 Mrs. Cheryl Dyer, Superintendent Dr. Lisa Gleason, Director of Curriculum and Instruction 1

Topics Covered Proposed Changes for Statewide Assessments PARCC Results SAT and ACT Results Advanced Placement (AP) Results No reportable Science data due to NJSLA - Science Field Test 2

Proposed Changes to Statewide Assessments and High School Graduation Requirements (N.J.A.C. 6A:8) Current Regulations Proposed Amendments Take all associated PARCC assessments for: ELA 9, 10, 11 Alg. I, Geometry, Algebra II Take and pass: ELA 10 Algebra I Class of 2021 (current sophomores) Only alternative graduation option is Portfolio Appeals Process Class of 2020 (current juniors) Students must take all applicable assessments before availing themselves of the menu of alternate options Take associated PARCC assessments for: ELA 9 and 10 End of course math in 9th and 10th (Alg 1 and Geometry OR Geometry and Algebra II) Take and pass: ELA 10 Algebra I Maintain the menu of graduation assessment options afforded to the class of 2020, including: ACT, SAT, ASFAB, PSAT, and ACCUPLACER Portfolio Appeals Process 3

Immediate Changes for Spring 2019 Reduced Testing Times 4

5

PARCC Results English Language Arts Mathematics Grades 3-11 6

PARCC Performance Descriptors 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations for NJSLS 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations for NJSLS 3: Approaching grade-level expectations for NJSLS 4: Meeting grade-level expectations for NJSLS 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations for NJSLS 7

English Language Arts 8

3rd Grade English Language Arts # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 98,314 750 14% 14% 21% 44% 8% 52% District 2018 239 766 5% 12% 15% 57% 11% 68% District 2017 239 766 3% 10% 18% 57% 13% 70% AW 56 775 5% 13% 14% 48% 20% 68% CS 78 771 3% 5% 21% 60% 12% 72% OM 76 756 8% 17% 11% 59% 5% 64% WB 29 764 3% 17% 14% 55% 10% 65% 16% increase over state average. All schools exceeded state average more than 10%. 2% decrease in overall passing from 2017 to 2018 in this grade level. 9

3rd Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 98,314 750 13.5% 13.5% 21.4% 43.5% 4.8% 51.7% District 239 766 5.0% 12.1% 15.1% 56.5% 11.3% 67.8% Female 123 774 3.3% 10.6% 8.9% 61.0% 16.3% 77.2% Male 116 758 6.9% 13.8% 21.6% 51.7% 6.0% 57.8% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 211 769 4.3% 10.9% 14.7% 57.3% 12.8% 70.1% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 30 736 10.0% 33.3% 26.7% 26.7% 3.3% 30.0% SE-Yes 34 727 23.5% 32.4% 17.6% 26.5% 0.0% 26.5% 504-Yes < 20 10

4th Grade English Language Arts # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 99,447 756 8% 12% 22% 39% 19% 58% District 2018 District 2017 249 764 4% 8% 23% 44% 22% 66% 226 765 1% 9% 20% 50% 19% 69% AW 54 772 4% 4% 19% 37% 37% 74% CS 95 755 3% 8% 34% 45% 9% 54% OM 68 770 4% 9% 15% 41% 31% 72% WB 32 762 3% 9% 19% 56% 13% 68% 8% increase over state average. Three schools exceeded state average more than 10%. 3% decrease in overall passing from 2017 to 2018 in this grade level. 11

4th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 99,447 756 7.6% 12.3% 22.1% 39.1% 18.9% 58.0% District 249 764 3.6% 7.6% 23.3% 43.8% 21.7% 65.5% Female 111 772 0.9% 6.3% 23.4% 43.2% 26.1% 69.4% Male 138 757 5.8% 8.7% 23.2% 44.2% 18.1% 62.3% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 214 765 3.3% 6.5% 22.9% 43.9% 23.4% 67.3% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 36 736 11.1% 22.2% 38.9% 27.8% 0.0% 27.8% SE-Yes 46 738 15.2% 26.1% 26.1% 21.7% 10.9% 32.6% 504-Yes <20 12

5th Grade English Language Arts # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 101,065 755 7% 13% 22% 47% 11% 58% District 2018 District 2017 237 762 3% 8% 22% 54% 13% 67% 222 766 0% 4% 18% 66% 12% 78% AW 62 755 3% 10% 26% 53% 8% 61% CS 73 763 1% 5% 27% 55% 11% 66% OM 64 767 3% 11% 14% 55% 17% 72% WB 28 767 7% 7% 18% 50% 18% 68% 9% increase over state average. Two schools exceeded state average more than 10%. 11% decrease in overall passing from 2017 to 2018 in this grade level. 13

5th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 101,065 755 6.9% 12.6% 22.4% 47.2% 10.8% 58.0% District 227 762 3.1% 8.4% 22.0% 53.7% 12.8% 66.5% Female 103 772 2.9% 3.9% 15.5% 57.3% 20.4% 77.7% Male 124 754 3.2% 12.1% 27.4% 50.8% 6.5% 57.3% Hispanic 27 757 7.4% 18.5% 7.4% 55.6% 11.1% 66.7% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 187 763 2.7% 6.4% 25.1% 52.9% 12.8% 65.8% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 30 747 13.3% 23.3% 10.0% 46.7% 6.7% 53.3% SE-Yes 52 744 5.8% 23.1% 30.8% 36.5% 3.8% 40.4% 504-Yes < 20 14

Targeted Interventions 3rd - 5th Grade English Language Arts 15

Incorporate new digital formative assessment, Measuring Up, in grades 2-5 for diagnostic assessment, and progress monitoring Workshop model - teacher conferring in small groups to customize instruction and target deficits. Increases student choice. 1:1 Chromebooks to increase students ability to improve keyboarding, writing, and research Increase informational text and work with Literary Analysis and Research Simulation Tasks 16

Teachers participating in PLCs and district-wide grade level articulation to analyze data and adjust instruction. New word study program in grades 3-5 Words Their Way, to improve written expression and written knowledge New RTI model provides teachers with more specific interventions for struggling learners, including new digital intervention resource Branching Minds Title I programs for extended day intervention programs. 17

6th-8th Grade English Language Arts # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. 6 th grade 22% increase over state average. 10% increase in overall passing from 2017 State 99,421 754 6% 14% 24% 41% 15% 56% District 18 237 768 1% 5% 17% 57% 21% 78% District 17 263 760 2% 8% 22% 57% 11% 68% 7 th grade 12% increase over state average. 9% increase in overall passing from 2017 State 99,295 760 9% 10% 19% 34% 29% 63% District 18 270 773 3% 6% 16% 38% 37% 75% District 17 267 765 4% 9% 21% 36% 30% 66% 8 th grade 5% increase over state average. 2% increase in overall passing from 2017 State 100,150 759 9% 11% 20% 40% 20% 60% District 18 277 763 5% 12% 18% 42% 23% 65% District 17 305 759 8% 7% 22% 45% 18% 63% 18

6th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 99,421 754 6.2% 13.6% 24.0% 41.3% 14.9% 56.2% District 237 768 1.3% 4.6% 16.5% 56.5% 21.1% 77.6% Female 106 773 0.9% 1.9% 17.0% 50.9% 29.2% 80.2% Male 131 764 1.5% 6.9% 16.0% 61.1% 14.5% 75.6% Hispanic > 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 205 769 1.5% 4.4% 15.1% 57.1% 22.0% 79.0% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 28 747 3.6% 7.1% 39.3% 46.4% 3.6% 50.0% SE-Yes 37 741 8.1% 21.6% 29.7% 32.4% 8.1% 40.5% 504-Yes < 20 19

7th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 98,292 760 8.6% 10.2% 18.5% 34.1% 28.6% 62.7% District 270 773 3.0% 5.8% 16.3% 37.8% 37.4% 75.2% Female 137 782 1.5% 3.6% 10.9% 38.0% 46.0% 83.9% Male 133 764 4.5% 7.5% 21.8% 37.6% 28.6% 66.2% Hispanic 30 753 3.3% 6.7% 43.3% 33.3% 13.3% 46.7% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 224 776 3.1% 4.5% 12.5% 38.4% 41.5% 79.9% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 32 749 3.1% 18.8% 31.3% 37.5% 9.4% 46.9% SE-Yes 46 739 13.0% 6.5% 41.3% 34.8% 4.3% 39.1% 504-Yes < 20 20

8th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 100,150 759 8.7% 11.1% 19.8% 39.9% 20.4% 60.4% District 277 763 5.4% 11.9% 18.4% 41.5% 22.7% 64.3% Female 123 776 3.3% 1.6% 13.0% 54.5% 27.6% 82.1% Male 154 752 7.1% 20.1% 22.7% 31.2% 18.8% 50.0% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 244 764 5.7% 11.5% 17.6% 41.8% 23.4% 65.2% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 24 746 8.3% 16.7% 25.0% 37.5% 12.5% 50.0% SE-Yes 51 733 19.6% 25.5% 29.4% 11.8% 13.7% 25.5% 504-Yes 21 734 14.3% 33.3% 19.0% 28.6% 4.8% 33.3% 21

Targeted Interventions 6th-8th Grade English Language Arts 22

Digital formative assessments, Measuring Up, for diagnostic assessment and progress monitoring. Increase in informational text through Measuring Up and Newsela. New intervention course for ELA, small group instruction, data based instruction Additional teaching support in 7th grade ELA for identified at risk students to provide Tier II supports. Teachers using CD time to analyze PARCC Evidence Statements to identify grade level weaknesses and target areas for at risk students. Title I programs for extended day and summer programs. 23

Workshop model - teacher conferring in small groups to customize instruction and target deficits. Increases student choice. 1:1 Chromebooks to increase students ability to provide increased opportunities for keyboarding, writing, research Continue to identify ED students at risk for literacy and analyze interventions and Title I extended day and extended year opportunities. New RTI model provides teachers with more specific interventions for struggling learners, including new digital intervention resource Branching Minds 24

9th-11th Grade English Language Arts # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. 9 th grade 8% increase over state average. 2% increase in overall passing from 2017. State 99,370 751 12% 13% 21% 38% 16% 54% District 18 291 759 5% 9% 24% 46% 16% 62% District 17 232 757 13% 17% 28% 47% 13% 60% 10 th grade 3% decrease compared to state average. 8% decrease in overall passing from 2017. State 95,296 748 18% 13% 19% 32% 18% 50% District 18 232 745 13% 17% 23% 37% 10% 47% District 17 269 753 7% 13% 25% 43% 12% 55% 11 th grade 2% decrease compared to state average. 5% decrease in overall passing from 2017. State 69,346 735 23% 17% 22% 29% 9% 38% District 18 247 736 15% 18% 31% 33% 3% 36% District 17 258 738 13% 18% 28% 38% 3% 41% 25

9th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 99,370 751 12.3% 12.5% 21.1% 38.0% 16.1% 54.1% District 291 750 5.2% 8.6% 24.4% 46.0% 15.8% 61.9% Female 149 769 2.0% 2.7% 19.5% 56.4% 19.5% 75.8% Male 142 748 8.5% 14.8% 29.6% 35.2% 12.0% 47.2% Hispanic 20 735 20.0% 10.0% 40.0% 25.0% 5.0% 30.0% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 257 760 4.3% 8.6% 23.0% 47.9% 16.3% 64.2% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 31 730 22.6% 19.4% 32.3% 16.1% 9.7% 25.8% SE-Yes 58 724 19.0% 22.4% 41.4% 17.2% 0.0% 17.2% 504-Yes 22 762 9.1% 4.5% 9.1% 68.2% 9.1% 77.3% 26

10th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 95,296 748 18.3% 12.8% 19.0% 31.8% 18.1% 49.9% District 232 745 13.4% 16.8% 22.8% 36.6% 10.3% 47.0% Female 102 757 9.8% 10.8% 14.7% 46.1% 18.6% 64.7% Male 130 735 16.2% 21.5% 29.2% 29.2% 3.8% 33.1% Hispanic 21 728 23.8% 23.8% 28.6% 19.0% 4.8% 23.8% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 201 747 11.9% 15.9% 22.9% 37.8% 11.4% 49.3% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 29 721 27.6% 20.7% 31.0% 20.7% 0.0% 20.7% SE-Yes 40 705 40.0% 37.5% 12.5% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 504-Yes < 20 27

11th Grade English Language Arts - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 69,346 735 23.1% 16.6% 22.2% 29.1% 9.0% 38.1% District 247 736 15.4% 18.2% 30.8% 32.8% 2.8% 35.6% Female 120 748 6.7% 14.2% 27.5% 45.8% 5.8% 51.7% Male 127 724 23.6% 22.0% 33.9% 20.5% 0.0% 20.5% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 223 736 14.8% 18.4% 29.6% 34.1% 3.1% 37.2% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 23 729 17.4% 17.4% 43.5% 21.7% 0.0% 21.7% SE-Yes 37 726 24.3% 24.3% 24.3% 24.3% 2.7% 27.0% 504-Yes < 20 28

Targeted Interventions 9th-11th Grade English Language Arts 29

Title I funding for extended day programs and shared school social worker Increase in informational text and progress monitoring through new digital resource, Newsela Supervisor working with teachers to analyze lesson plans for standards alignment Additional English push-in teaching support for Tier I interventions with struggling learners. Targeting English 10 classes due to HS graduation requirement. Unit Lunch English Support now available Teachers using CD time to analyze PARCC Evidence Statements to identify grade level weaknesses and target areas for at risk students 30

Workshop pilot - teacher conferring in small groups to customize instruction and target deficits. Increases student choice. 1:1 Chromebooks to increase students ability to provide increased opportunities for keyboarding, writing, research Continue to identify ED students at risk for literacy and analyze interventions and Title I extended day and extended year opportunities. New RTI model provides teachers with more specific interventions for struggling learners, including new digital intervention resource Branching Minds Analyze curriculum modifications for students with IEPS to ensure appropriate exposure to grade level standards. 31

Mathematics 32

3rd Grade Mathematics # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 99,262 752 8% 15% 24% 38% 15% 53% District 2018 District 2017 240 767 3% 5% 20% 45% 27% 72% 240 766 2% 7% 18% 49% 24% 73% Allenwood 56 776 2% 4% 11% 48% 36% 84% Central 78 765 1% 3% 24% 49% 23% 72% Old Mill 77 762 5% 9% 22% 40% 23% 73% West Belmar 29 769 7% 3% 21% 41% 28% 69% 19% increase over state average. All schools exceeded state average more than 10%. 1% decrease in overall passing from 2017 to 2018 in this grade level. 33

3rd Grade Mathematics - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 99,262 752 8.0% 15.3% 23.7% 37.8% 15.2% 53.0% District 240 767 3.3% 5.0% 20.0% 45.0% 26.7% 71.7% Female 124 766 4.0% 6.5% 22.6% 39.5% 27.4% 66.9% Male 116 769 2.6% 3.4% 17.2% 50.9 25.9% 76.7% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 212 770 1.9% 5.2% 18.9% 44.3% 29.7% 74.1% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 31 742 12.9% 12.9% 29.0.% 41.9% 3.2% 45.2% SE-Yes 35 738 14.3% 17.1% 40.0% 17.1% 11.4% 28.6% 504-Yes < 20 34

4th Grade Mathematics # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 100,378 748 8% 17% 26% 42% 8% 50% District 2018 District 2017 249 756 2% 14% 27% 46% 11% 57% 226 752 3% 14% 26% 52% 5% 57% Allenwood 54 770 4% 6% 19% 48% 24% 72% Central 95 747 2% 24% 26% 42% 5% 47% Old Mill 68 757 1% 9% 31% 49% 10% 59% West Belmar 32 760 0% 6% 34% 50% 9% 59% 7% increase over state average. Three schools exceeded state average, AW by 22% Consistent performance in overall passing from 2017 to 2018 in this grade level. 35

4th Grade Mathematics - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 100,378 748 7.5% 16.8% 26.3% 41.8% 7.6% 49.4% District 249 756 2.0% 13.7% 26.9% 46.2% 11.2% 57.4% Female 111 759 1.8% 7.2% 30.6% 48.6% 11.7% 60.4% Male 138 754 2.2% 18.8% 23.9% 44.2% 10.9% 55.1% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 214 757 1.9% 12.1% 27.6% 46.7% 11.7% 58.4% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 36 735 5.6% 30.6% 36.1% 27.8% 0,0% 27.8% SE-Yes 46 736 8.7% 26.1% 34.8% 30.4% 0.0% 30.4% 504-Yes < 20 36

5th Grade Mathematics # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 101,703 748 7% 17% 27% 38% 10% 48% District 2018 District 2017 226 755 2% 12% 29% 47% 10% 57% 223 756 1% 10% 30% 49% 10% 59% Allenwood 61 755 2% 11% 28% 51% 8% 59% Central 73 753 0% 14% 30% 49% 7% 56% Old Mill 64 758 3% 9% 28% 45% 14% 59% West Belmar 28 751 7% 11% 29% 39% 14% 53% 9% increase over state average. Two schools exceeded state average. 2% decrease in overall passing from 2017 to 2018 in this grade level. 37

5th Grade Mathematics - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 1001,703 748 7.5% 17.0% 26.7% 38.5% 10.4% 48.8% District 226 755 2.2% 11.5% 28.8% 47.3% 10.2% 57.5% Female 103 758 1.9% 8.7% 30.1% 44.7% 14.6% 59.2% Male 123 752 2.4% 13.8% 27.6% 49.6% 6.5% 56.1% Hispanic 27 743 7.4% 18.5% 25.9% 44.4% 3.7% 48.1% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 186 756 1.6% 10.8% 28.5% 48.9% 10.2% 59.1% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 30 737 10.0% 23.3% 33.3% 26.7% 6.7% 33.3% SE-Yes 52 739 5.8% 26.9% 36.5% 26.9% 3.8% 30.8% 504-Yes < 20 38

Targeted Interventions 3rd - 5th Grade Mathematics 39

Incorporate new digital formative assessment, Measuring Up, in grades 2-5 for diagnostic assessment, and progress monitoring Teachers participating in PLCs and district-wide grade level articulation to analyze data and adjust instruction Targeted centers specific to student s areas for growth New RTI model provides teachers with more specific interventions for struggling learners, including new digital intervention resource Branching Minds 40

New district RTI Math team leading professional development Math interventionists Title I extended day programs for Tier II interventions 41

6th-8th Grade Mathematics # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. 6 th grade 16% increase over state average. 5% increase in overall passing from 2017 State 100,174 744 8% 20% 28% 36% 8% 44% District 18 235 756 2% 10% 28% 51% 9% 60% District 17 263 752 5% 9% 31% 49% 6% 55% 7 th grade 6% increase over state average. 12% increase in overall passing from 2017 State 94,938 743 8% 20% 29% 36% 7% 44% District 18 206 748 2% 14% 34% 50% 0% 50% District 17 208 743 1% 14% 47% 37% 1% 38% 8 th grade 11% increase over state average. 20% increase in overall passing from 2017 State 64,462 728 22% 23% 27% 27% 1% 29% District 18 123 742 8% 18% 33% 41% 0% 41% District 17 93 726 23% 20% 35% 20% 1% 21% 42

6th Grade Mathematics - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 100,174 744 8.5% 20.1% 27.9% 35.6% 8.0% 43.5% District 235 756 1.7% 10.2% 27.7% 51.1% 9.4% 60.4% Female 106 756 1.9% 10.4% 27.4% 47.2% 13.2% 60.4% Male 129 756 1.6% 10.1% 27.9% 54.3% 6.2% 60.5% Hispanic <20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 203 757 1.5% 9.4% 26.6% 53.2% 9.4% 62.6% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 28 737 3.6% 28.6% 35.7% 28.6% 3.6% 32.1% SE-Yes 37 733 8.1% 35.1% 29.7% 21.6% 5.4% 27.0% 504-Yes < 20 43

7th Grade Mathematics - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 94,938 743 7.7% 20.3% 28.6% 36.0% 7.4% 43.4% District 207 748 2.4% 13.5% 33.8% 49.8% 0.5% 50.2% Female 110 751 0.9% 12.7% 30.0% 55.5% 0.9% 56.4% Male 97 744 4.1% 14.4% 38.1% 43.3% 0.0% 43.3% Hispanic 29 734 0.0% 31.0% 44.8% 24.1% 0.0% 24.1% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 164 750 3.0% 9.1% 32.3% 54.9% 0.6% 55.5% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 30 732 0.0% 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% SE-Yes 46 733 10.9% 26.1% 37.7% 26.1% 0.0% 26.1% 504-Yes < 20 44

8th Grade Mathematics - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 64,462 728 22.0% 22.7% 27.1% 27.2% 1.0% 28.2% District 123 742 8.1% 17.9% 32.5% 41.5% 0.0% 41.5% Female 41 748 7.3% 14.6% 22.0% 56.1% 0.0% 56.1% Male 82 739 8.5% 19.5% 37.8% 34.1% 0.0% 34.1% Hispanic < 20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 105 742 8.6% 16.2% 33.3% 41.9% 0.0% 41.9% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes < 20 SE-Yes 42 729 19.0% 23.8% 31.0% 26.2% 0.0% 26.2% 504-Yes < 20 45

Targeted Interventions 6th-8th Grade Mathematics 46

New envision Math resource grades 7 & 8 Incorporate new digital formative assessment, Measuring Up, in grades 6-8 for diagnostic assessment, and progress monitoring Teachers participating in PLCs and district-wide grade level articulation to analyze data and adjust instruction New RTI model provides teachers with more specific interventions for struggling learners, including new digital intervention resource Branching Minds 47

New district RTI Math team leading professional development Additional math teacher available during Math 7 to provide Tier II interventions. Currently undergoing Math program evaluation 48

Algebra I # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 110,972 746 11% 19% 24% 39% 6% 45% District 2018 293 764 3% 7% 17% 67% 5% 72% District 2017 347 756 2% 10% 29% 58% 1% 59% WIS 159 781 0% 1% 3% 87% 9% 96% WHS 134 743 7% 14% 35% 43% 0% 43% 27% increase over state average. 13% increase in overall passing from 2017. WIS - 22% increase in overall passing from 2017. 49

Algebra I - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 110,972 746 11.3% 18.6% 24.3% 39.3% 6.5% 45.8% District 293 764 3.4% 6.8% 17.4% 67.2% 5.1% 72.4% Female 146 767 1.4% 4.1% 18.5% 71.2% 4.8% 76.0% Male 147 760 5.4% 9.5% 16.3% 63.3% 5.4% 68.7% Hispanic 24 750 8.3% 12.5% 25.0% 50.0% 4.2% 54.2% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 252 765 2.8% 6.7% 16.7% 68.7% 5.2% 73.8% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 34 744 11.8% 14.7% 32.4% 38.2% 2.9% 41.2% SE-Yes 59 737 11.9% 25.4% 28.8% 33.9 0.0% 33.9% 504-Yes 20 761 0.0% 10.0% 25.0% 60.0% 5.0% 65.0% 50

Geometry # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 90,159 734 9% 31% 30% 25% 5% 30% District 2018 District 2017 311 745 1% 18% 37% 41% 3% 44% 248 744 4% 18% 37% 36% 5% 41% WIS 63 768 0% 0% 17% 67% 16% 83% WHS 248 739 2% 22% 42% 34% 0% 34% 14% increase over state average. 3% increase in overall passing from 2017. 51

Geometry- Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 90,159 734 9.4% 31.5% 29.6% 24.6% 4.9% 29.5% District 311 745 1.3% 17.7% 37.0% 40.8% 3.2% 44.1% Female 153 748 0.7% 12.4% 39.9% 43.8% 3.3% 47.1% Male 158 743 1.9% 22.8% 34.2% 38.0% 3.2% 41.1% Hispanic 23 733 8.7% 17.4% 56.5% 17.4% 0.0% 17.4% Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 275 746 0.7% 17.5% 35.6% 42.5% 3.6% 46.2% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes 30 733 6.7% 26.7% 43.3% 23.3% 0.0% 23.3% SE-Yes 41 722 2.4% 65.9% 22.0% 9.8% 0.0% 9.8% 504-Yes <20 52

Algebra II # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 78,508 725 31% 22% 18% 25% 4% 29% District 2018 District 2017 200 735 15% 25% 26% 34% 1% 36% 221 734 18% 17% 30% 34% 0% 34% 7% increase over state average. 2% increase in overall passing from 2017. 53

Algebra II - Disaggregated Data # of valid scores Average Scale Score One Two Three Four Five Four and Five comb. State 78,508 725 31.0% 22.4% 18.0% 24.6% 4.0% 28.6% District 200 735 14.5% 25.0% 25.5% 34.0% 1.0% 35.0% Female 96 736 15.6% 16.7% 34.4% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3% Male 104 734 13.5% 32.7% 17.3% 34.6% 1.9% 36.5% Hispanic <20 Asian < 10 Black < 10 White 178 738 12.9% 23.0% 27.0% 36.0% 1.1% 37.1% 2 or more races <10 ED-Yes <20 SE-Yes 23 709 30.4% 47.8% 17.4% 4.3% 0.0% 4.3% 504-Yes <20 54

Targeted Interventions Algebra I Geometry Algebra II 55

Algebra and Geometry teachers at WIS and WHS will pilot new digital resource, Math IXL, a standards-based progress monitoring tool Algebra I 7.5 course meets A/B for full year Algebra II 7.5 course meets A/B for full year Math Unit Lunch support teacher available daily Supervisors working with teachers to analyze PARCC Evidence Statements to identify areas for growth and adjust planning and instruction 56

New RTI model provides teachers with more specific interventions for struggling learners, including new digital intervention resource Branching Minds New district RTI Math team leading professional development Currently undergoing Math program evaluation 57

SAT/ACT Results Wall High School 58

SAT Results: 5 Year Data Critical Reading 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 5 Year Change Wall HS 527 524 506 566 566 +39 New Jersey 501 500 495 439 N/A N/A Total Group 497 495 494 N/A N/A N/A Mathematics 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 5 Year Change Wall HS 547 536 528 559 574 +27 New Jersey 523 521 514 537 N/A N/A Total Group 513 511 508 N/A N/A N/A 59

ACT Results: 5 Year Data English 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 5 Year Change Wall HS 22.6 22.5 22.0 24.5 23.0 +.4 New Jersey 22.8 22.9 22.7 23.8 23.8 +1.0 Benchmark Score: Mathematics 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 5 Year Change Wall HS 24.5 22.8 22.8 24.0 23.5-1.0 New Jersey 23.7 23.7 23.3 23.8 23.6 -.1 Benchmark Score: 60

ACT Results: 5 Year Data Reading 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 5 Year Change Wall HS 23.2 22.8 23.1 25.2 24.0 +.8 New Jersey 23.1 23.3 23.5 24.1 24.0 +.9 Benchmark Score: Science 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 5 Year Change Wall HS 22.5 22.2 22.2 23.3 23.1 +.6 New Jersey 22.4 22.6 22.5 23.2 23.0 +.6 Benchmark Score: 61

Advanced Placement (AP) Wall High School 62

Course/Test 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Art History 25% N/A N/A N/A 100% Biology 76% 96% 100% 97% 96% Calculus AB 100% 70% 91% 88% 50% Calculus BC 84% 79% 90% 89% 91% Chemistry 100% 100% 100% 86% 94% Computer Science N/A N/A 100% 100% N/A English Language and Composition 81% 92% 93% 100% 90% English Literature and Composition 84% 100% 91% 81% 75% Environmental Science 63% 56% 71% 69% 71% European History N/A N/A 16% 42% N/A Values in chart are % passing Passing scores are scores of 3, 4, or 5 63

Course/Test 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 French Language and Culture N/A N/A 9% 40% 33% Human Geography N/A N/A 88% 100% 100% Latin 100% N/A 33% 10% 50% Macroeconomics 61% 46% 42% 87% 91% Microeconomics 65% 40% 44% 36% 43% Music Theory N/A 100% 75% 80% 100% Physics 1 N/A 82% 43% 56% 64% Psychology 74% 80% 76% 83% 69% Spanish Language and Culture 79% 92% 85% 89% 90% Statistics 60% 29% 58% 100% 77% 64

Course/Test 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Studio Art: 2-D Design Portfolio N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% Studio Art: Drawing Portfolio N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% US Government and Politics N/A 46% 41% 94% 100% United States History 70% 65% 73% 89% 100% Overall Passing 78% 78% 70% 87% 86% 65

Breakdown of 2018 Scores* Test Total Exams 3 4 5 Total Passing Test Total Exams 3 4 5 Total Passing Biology 28 13 12 2 96% Environmental Science Calculus AB 28 8 3 3 50% Human Geography 41 10 17 2 71% 15 1 5 9 100% Calculus BC 45 15 14 12 91% Macro 22 4 11 5 91% Chemistry 16 4 8 3 94% Physics 14 4 5 0 64% English Lang 10 3 2 4 90% Psychology 13 4 4 1 69% English Lit 12 4 3 2 75% Spanish 10 5 3 1 90% Statistics 31 8 9 7 77% *The breakdown is not reported for courses/tests where fewer than 10 students took the test. 66

Highlights of AP 2016 Total Passing Scores 304 Total scores of 3: 129 (42%) Total scores of 4: 119 (39%) Total scores of 5: 57 (19%) 2017 Total Passing Scores: 313 Total Scores of 3: 120 (38%) Total Scores of 4: 137 (44%) Total Scores of 5: 56 (18%) 2018 Total Passing Scores: 264 Total Scores of 3: 94 (29% Total Scores of 4: 105 (32%) Total Scores of 5: 65 (20%) 41 AP Scholars 17 AP Scholars with Honor 10 AP Scholars with Distinction 1 National Scholar 31 AP Scholars 15 AP Scholars with Honor 21 AP Scholars with Distinction 2 National Scholars 26 AP Scholars 11 AP Scholars with Honor 12 AP Scholars with Distinction 1 National Scholar 67

ACCESS for ELLs K-12 68

Purpose of ACCESS The content of the assessments aligns with the five WIDA ELD Standards: Social & Instructional Language Language of Language Arts Language of Mathematics Language of Science Language of Social Studies 69

ACCESS - 2017-18 One: Entering Two: Emerging Three: Developing Four: Expanding Five: Bridging Six: Reaching Listening 3 5 7 5 7 36 Speaking 8 19 29 5 6 0 Reading 11 11 8 3 12 18 Writing 9 13 31 10 0 0 Oral Language 4 12 16 20 6 5 Literacy 10 11 24 18 8 1 Comprehension 7 9 13 4 6 24 Overall Score 8 11 20 17 4 0 70

Exit from ESL Program Students exit the ESL program based on triangulation of the following criteria: ACCESS score at or above 4.5 PARCC scores Report card grades Classroom teacher recommendation ESL teacher recommendation Students exit the ESL program based on triangulation of the following criteria: 7 ESL program students 71

72