KIPP Academy of Opportunity

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Engage Educate Empower

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Diablo Vista Middle 1

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Shelters Elementary School

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Hokulani Elementary School

Val Verde Unified School District

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Kahului Elementary School

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

African American Male Achievement Update

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Val Verde Unified School District

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Cuero Independent School District

University of Arizona

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

12-month Enrollment

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Organization Profile

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

Educational Attainment

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

State Parental Involvement Plan

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

CDS Code

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

World s Best Workforce Plan

Raw Data Files Instructions

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review


Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Data Diskette & CD ROM

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Transcription:

KIPP Academy of Opportunity California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2014-15 School Year Published During 2015-16 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians, and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners. Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. Tanya Gray, School Leader Principal, KIPP Academy of Opportunity About Our School About Our School KIPP Academy of Opportunity is a community school committed to serving students and families in South Los Angeles. We teach the the academic skills, intellectual habits and character traits necessary for success in high school, college and life. Our school is driven a deep belief that all children deserve an excellent, college-preparatory education. Our students are hard working, eager to learn and demonstrate leadership and citizenship daily. As a team and family, we are dedicated to constant growth, pursuit of excellence and building a better future for our students and our society. Contact KIPP Academy of Opportunity 7019 South Van Ness Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90047-1659 Phone: 323-778-0125 E-mail: tgray@kippla.org

About This School Contact Information - Most Recent Year Contact Information - Most Recent Year District Contact Information - Most Recent Year School Contact Information - Most Recent Year District Name Los Angeles Unified School Name KIPP Academy of Opportunity Phone Number (213) 241-1000 Street 7019 South Van Ness Ave. Superintendent Michelle King City, State, Zip Los Angeles, Ca, 90047-1659 E-mail Address michelle.king@lausd.net Phone Number 323-778-0125 Web Site results.asp?district-schools=los%20angeles%20unifi Principal Tanya Gray, School Leader E-mail Address tgray@kippla.org Web Site www.kippla.org/kao/ County-District- 19647330101444 School (CDS) Code School Description and Mission Statement - Most Recent Year School Description and Mission Statement - Most Recent Year KAO s mission is to ensure that students develop the academic skills, character, and intellectual habits necessary to succeed in competitive high schools, colleges, and the world beyond. Our six guiding principles are: respect, hard work, results, constant learning, determination, and teamwork. Page 2 of 24

Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2014-15) Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2014-15) Grade Level Number of Students Grade 5 88 120 Grade 6 111 Grade 7 106 Grade 8 101 Total Enrollment 406 100 80 60 40 20 0 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2014-15) Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2014-15) Student Group of Total Enrollment Black or African American 84.5 % American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0 % Asian 0.0 % 2% 11% 1% Filipino 0.0 % Hispanic or Latino 13.8 % Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.0 % 83% 84% White 0.0 % 13% Two or More Races 0.5 % Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 83.3 % English Learners 2.3 % Students with Disabilities 11.5 % Foster Youth 1.5 % Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities Foster Youth Last updated: 12/16/2015 Page 3 of 24

A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair Teacher Credentials Teacher Credentials Teachers School District 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 With Full Credential 23 16 14 2015-16 25 20 Teachers with Full Credential Teachers without Full Credential Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence Without Full Credential 0 1 7 Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0 0 0 15 10 5 0 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Indicator Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 0 0 0 Total Teacher Misassignments* 0 0 0 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 1 0 1.2 1.0 0.8 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments Vacant Teacher Positions 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English learners. Page 4 of 24

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2014-15) Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2014-15) Location of Classes of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 100.0% 0.0% All Schools in District 88.0% 12.0% High-Poverty Schools in District Low-Poverty Schools in District 93.0% 7.0% 45.0% 55.0% Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Lowpoverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent Year Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent Year Year and month in which data were collected: January 2016 Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/year of Adoption From Most Recent Adoption? Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy Reading/Language Arts 0.0 % Adapted readers and writers workshop model, Accelerated Reader, Achieve3000, Scholastic Guided Reading to support literacy growth Mathematics State standards to create scope and sequence. Compass Learning digital curriculum. Supplemental materials include CPM and Eureka Math. 0.0 % Science Driven by the state standards, supplemented by Next Generation Science Standards. 0.0 % History-Social Science History Alive curriculum across all grade levels. 0.0 % Foreign Language 0.0 % Health 0.0 % Visual and Performing Arts Science Lab Eqpmt (Grades 9-12) 0.0 % 0.0 % Last updated: 1/27/2016 Page 5 of 24

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements - Most Recent Year School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements - Most Recent Year We strive to keep our school in the best quality for our students. We do not have any major planned improvements at this time. School Facility Good Repair Status - Most Recent Year Year and month in which data were collected: January 2016 Last updated: 1/27/2016 System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Rating Fair Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned One classroom heater in process of being repaired Interior: Interior Surfaces Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/Doors/Gates/Fences Good Good Good Good Fair Good Good Overall Facility Rate - Most Recent Year Year and month in which data were collected: January 2016 Overall Rating Good Last updated: 1/27/2016 Page 6 of 24

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP], Science California Standards Tests); and The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results for All Students (School Year 2014-15) California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results for All Students (School Year 2014-15) of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards Subject School District State English Language Arts / Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) 29.0% 33.0% 44.0% Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11) 18.0% 25.0% 33.0% Note: ages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students tested is ten or less. Page 7 of 24

ELA - Grade 5 ELA - Grade 5 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 79 78 98.7% 47.0% 27.0% 18.0% 8.0% Male 79 37 46.8% 59.0% 24.0% 14.0% 3.0% Female 79 41 51.9% 37.0% 29.0% 22.0% 12.0% Black or African American 79 63 79.7% 51.0% 27.0% 17.0% 5.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 79 14 17.7% 29.0% 29.0% 21.0% 21.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 79 68 86.1% 46.0% 29.0% 19.0% 6.0% English Learners 79 3 3.8% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 79 7 8.9% -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 8 of 24

ELA- Grade 6 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 100 99 99.0% 26.0% 34.0% 29.0% 10.0% Male 100 46 46.0% 30.0% 39.0% 24.0% 7.0% Female 100 53 53.0% 23.0% 30.0% 34.0% 13.0% Black or African American 100 87 87.0% 24.0% 36.0% 30.0% 10.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 100 12 12.0% 42.0% 25.0% 25.0% 8.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 100 78 78.0% 29.0% 32.0% 27.0% 12.0% English Learners 100 1 1.0% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 100 12 12.0% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 9 of 24

ELA - Grade 7 ELA - Grade 7 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 97 93 95.9% 39.0% 37.0% 24.0% 1.0% Male 97 41 42.3% 49.0% 34.0% 15.0% 2.0% Female 97 52 53.6% 31.0% 38.0% 31.0% 0.0% Black or African American 97 80 82.5% 40.0% 35.0% 25.0% 0.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 97 13 13.4% 31.0% 46.0% 15.0% 8.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 97 85 87.6% 40.0% 34.0% 25.0% 1.0% English Learners 97 2 2.1% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 97 13 13.4% 69.0% 31.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 10 of 24

ELA - Grade 8 ELA - Grade 8 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 97 95 97.9% 41.0% 35.0% 22.0% 2.0% Male 97 40 41.2% 45.0% 38.0% 18.0% 0.0% Female 97 55 56.7% 38.0% 33.0% 25.0% 4.0% Black or African American 97 81 83.5% 42.0% 33.0% 22.0% 2.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 97 12 12.4% 33.0% 42.0% 25.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 97 2 2.1% -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 97 70 72.2% 44.0% 31.0% 23.0% 1.0% English Learners 97 3 3.1% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 97 7 7.2% -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 11 of 24

Mathematics - Grade 5 Mathematics - Grade 5 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 79 78 98.7% 42.0% 38.0% 14.0% 5.0% Male 79 37 46.8% 51.0% 27.0% 19.0% 3.0% Female 79 41 51.9% 34.0% 49.0% 10.0% 7.0% Black or African American 79 63 79.7% 46.0% 40.0% 10.0% 5.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 79 14 17.7% 21.0% 36.0% 36.0% 7.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 79 68 86.1% 46.0% 35.0% 16.0% 3.0% English Learners 79 3 3.8% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 79 7 8.9% -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 12 of 24

Mathematics - Grade 6 Mathematics - Grade 6 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 100 99 99.0% 33.0% 36.0% 22.0% 8.0% Male 100 46 46.0% 37.0% 35.0% 22.0% 7.0% Female 100 53 53.0% 30.0% 38.0% 23.0% 9.0% Black or African American 100 87 87.0% 32.0% 36.0% 23.0% 9.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 100 12 12.0% 42.0% 42.0% 17.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 100 78 78.0% 33.0% 36.0% 24.0% 6.0% English Learners 100 1 1.0% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 100 12 12.0% 83.0% 17.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 13 of 24

Mathematics - Grade 7 Mathematics - Grade 7 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 97 93 95.9% 45.0% 41.0% 12.0% 2.0% Male 97 41 42.3% 41.0% 41.0% 15.0% 2.0% Female 97 52 53.6% 48.0% 40.0% 10.0% 2.0% Black or African American 97 80 82.5% 46.0% 43.0% 9.0% 3.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 97 13 13.4% 38.0% 31.0% 31.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 97 85 87.6% 48.0% 36.0% 13.0% 2.0% English Learners 97 2 2.1% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 97 13 13.4% 77.0% 23.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 14 of 24

Mathematics - Grade 8 Mathematics - Grade 8 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 97 95 97.9% 68.0% 23.0% 7.0% 1.0% Male 97 40 41.2% 70.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Female 97 55 56.7% 67.0% 25.0% 5.0% 2.0% Black or African American 97 81 83.5% 69.0% 22.0% 7.0% 1.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 97 12 12.4% 58.0% 33.0% 8.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 97 2 2.1% -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 97 70 72.2% 70.0% 24.0% 4.0% 1.0% English Learners 97 3 3.1% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 97 7 7.2% -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 15 of 24

California Standards Tests for All Students in Science Three-Year Comparison California Standards Tests for All Students in Science Three-Year Comparison of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State Subject 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 83.0% 74.0% 26.0% 50.0% 50.0% 46.0% 59.0% 60.0% 56.0% Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students tested is ten or less. California Standards Tests Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2014-15) Student Group of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced All Students in the LEA 46.0% All Students at the School 26.0% Male 26.0% Female 27.0% Black or African American 24.0% American Indian or Alaska Native -- Asian -- Filipino -- Hispanic or Latino 30.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- White -- Two or More Races -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 24.0% English Learners -- Students with Disabilities -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- Foster Youth -- Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students tested is ten or less. Page 16 of 24

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8): Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of English, mathematics, and physical education Page 17 of 24

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite Opportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent Year Opportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent Year KIPP Academy of Opportunity provides various volunteer opportunities for parents inside and outside the classroom environment. Parents are welcome to help teachers during instructional time to help support the continual growth of students. We also encourage families to volunteer during our school wide events that we host throughout the year. Parents have participated in our monthly Coffee with the Principal, our It-Takes-A-Village Parent meetings, amongst other things. Our goal is to continue to work closely with our families to help our students get to and through college. Annually we engage our parents in the review and development of our schools' LCAP. State Priority: Pupil Engagement Last updated: 2/1/2016 The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Engagement (Priority 5): High school dropout rates; and High school graduation rates Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) School District State Indicator 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Dropout Rate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 13.1% 11.4% 11.5% Graduation Rate 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.60 68.10 70.20 78.87 80.44 80.95 Dropout/Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Chart 1.0 Dropout Rate Graduation Rate 0.5 0.0-0.5-1.0 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Page 18 of 24

Completion of High School Graduation Requirements Completion of High School Graduation Requirements Graduating Class of 2014 Student Group School District State All Students -- 88 84 Black or African American -- 86 76 American Indian or Alaska Native -- 87 78 Asian -- 94 92 Filipino -- 92 96 Hispanic or Latino -- 88 81 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- 92 83 White -- 91 89 Two or More Races -- 92 82 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- 89 81 English Learners -- 32 50 Students with Disabilities -- 74 61 Foster Youth -- -- -- Page 19 of 24

State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety Suspensions and Expulsions Suspensions and Expulsions School District State Rate 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Suspensions 0.0 11.0 5.4 1.7 1.3 0.9 5.1 4.4 3.8 Expulsions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Suspensions Expulsions 12 10 School Suspensions District Suspensions State Suspensions 0.12 0.10 School Expulsions District Expulsions State Expulsions 8 0.08 6 0.06 4 0.04 2 0.02 0 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 0.00 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 School Safety Plan - Most Recent Year The School Safety Plan has various components to help ensure we are most compliant in maintaning the safety of our students and staff. It includes safety drills, monthly facility walkthroughs, and a thorough Incident Command System. Page 20 of 24

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2014-15) Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2014-15) AYP Criteria School District State Made AYP Overall Yes Yes Met Participation Rate - English Language Arts Yes Yes Met Participation Rate - Mathematics Yes Yes Met Proficient - English Language Arts N/A No Met Proficient - Mathematics N/A No Met Attendance Rate Yes Met Graduation Rate N/A N/A Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2015-16) Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2015-16) Indicator School District Program Improvement Status Not in PI In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2004-2005 Year in Program Improvement Year 5 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 654 of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 82.6% Note: Cells with NA values do not require data. Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Grade Level K 1 2 3 4 Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ 5 31.0 18 26.0 24 6 32.0 12 6 25.0 32 Other * Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class). Page 21 of 24

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Subject Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ English 35.0 6 24.0 8 Mathematics 35.0 1 5 24.0 8 Science 35.0 6 24.0 8 Social Science 35.0 6 24.0 8 * Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level. Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2014-15) Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor Academic Counselor Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) Library Media Teacher (librarian) Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) N/A N/A N/A Psychologist 0.4 N/A Social Worker 1.0 N/A Nurse 0.2 N/A Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 0.5 N/A Resource Specialist (non-teaching) N/A Other 0.6 N/A Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. *One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Level Total Expenditures Per Pupil Expenditures Per Pupil (Supplemental/Restricted) Expenditures Per Pupil (Basic/Unrestricted) Average Teacher Salary School Site -- -- -- -- District N/A N/A $0.0 $68881.0 Difference School Site and District N/A N/A -- -9.0% State N/A N/A $5348.0 $72971.0 Difference School Site and State N/A N/A 19.9% -14.1% Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Last updated: 2/1/2016 Page 22 of 24

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2014-15) Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2014-15) KAO offers a variety of programs to meet the needs of our students and families. Our ASES funded afterschool program assists and supports our students after hours. Our program provides literacy and enrichment activities for 200 students, grades 5th through 8th. Our educational enrichment programs align with the school s academic program and include, but are not limited to, recreation and prevention activities such as football and basketball, youth development strategies like performing arts, music, and dance. Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $39,788 $43,165 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $63,553 $68,574 Highest Teacher Salary $78,906 $89,146 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $105,723 $111,129 Average Principal Salary (Middle) $115,222 $116,569 Average Principal Salary (High) $116,595 $127,448 Superintendent Salary $350,000 $234,382 of Budget for Teacher Salaries 35.0% 38.0% of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5.0% 5.0% For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Teacher Salary Chart Principal Salary Chart 90000 120000 80000 70000 60000 100000 80000 50000 60000 40000 30000 40000 20000 20000 10000 0 Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary 0 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) Average Principal Salary (Middle) Average Principal Salary (High) Page 23 of 24

Advanced Placement Courses (School Year 2014-15) Advanced Placement Courses (School Year 2014-15) Subject Number of AP Courses Offered* of Students In AP Courses Computer Science English Fine and Performing Arts Foreign Language Mathematics Science Social Science N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Courses -- Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. *Where there are student course enrollments. Note : AP means Advanced Placement. Professional Development Most Recent Three Years Our professional development is highly individualized and driven by core competencies of the KIPP Framework for Excellent Teaching and a focus on data-driven instruction. Each teacher has a set of personal goals that include performance metrics as well as development goals. These align with whole-school priorities and combine to drive professional development planning. Weekly staff PD occurs in modules consisting of 4-6 week focus areas and include whole school topics, individualized strands and professional learning communities by department. Teachers are provided with a coach who observes and meets with them weekly to drive individual development. Page 24 of 24