DISTRICT STUDENT PERFORMANCE REPORT

Similar documents
State of New Jersey

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

African American Male Achievement Update

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

FOUR STARS OUT OF FOUR

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Bellehaven Elementary

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Educational Attainment

3.7 General Education Homebound (GEH) Program

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

Cooper Upper Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

FTE General Instructions

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Charter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Wave III Education Data

Writing a Basic Assessment Report. CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Status of Latino Education in Massachusetts: A Report

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

Cuero Independent School District

Effectiveness of McGraw-Hill s Treasures Reading Program in Grades 3 5. October 21, Research Conducted by Empirical Education Inc.

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

NCEO Technical Report 27

Shelters Elementary School

World s Best Workforce Plan

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Bethune-Cookman University

EAP. updates KHENG WAICHE. early proficiency programs coordinator

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Proficiency Illusion

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

learning collegiate assessment]

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

State Parental Involvement Plan

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

New Hanover County Schools Announce the Results for the READY Assessments and Report the Highest Graduation Rate to Date

Biological Sciences, BS and BA

SLOAN-HENDRIX SCHOOL DISTRICT 2016 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE PUBLIC ADVANC-ED ACCREDITATION

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Two-thirds of APS Schools Increase on State CCRPI Scores

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

The Talent Development High School Model Context, Components, and Initial Impacts on Ninth-Grade Students Engagement and Performance

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound on Postsecondary Outcomes 7-9 Years After Scheduled High School Graduation

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

DAS-REMI District Accountability System Reporting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Instrument for the P2E2020SBP

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

ABILITY SORTING AND THE IMPORTANCE OF COLLEGE QUALITY TO STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM COMMUNITY COLLEGES

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Chapters 1-5 Cumulative Assessment AP Statistics November 2008 Gillespie, Block 4

Rules and Discretion in the Evaluation of Students and Schools: The Case of the New York Regents Examinations *

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School

What Does ESSA Mean for English Learners and #ESSAforELs

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Dr. Brent Benda and Ms. Nell Smith

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

International: Three-Year School Improvement Plan to September 2016 (Year 2)

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Transcription:

WOODBURY CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS A Leader in Personalizing Education DISTRICT STUDENT PERFORMANCE REPORT Addendum I: 2013-14 School Performance Reports To be Presented to the Woodbury City Board of Education February 25, 2015 Joseph Jones, III Superintendent of Schools Lindsay E. Wilhelmi Evaluation & Research Coordinator

Introduction This is the first of two addendums to the fall District Student Performance Report: 2013-14 Student Data, which provide and update on information that relates to the 2013-14 school year and was just recently released by the New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE). This report will focus on School Performance Reports and the second addendum provides an overview of student growth data. NJDOE released its annual School Performance Reports in February 2015. The data presented in these school-by-school documents is summarized in this addendum. School performance reports attempt to bring together multiple metrics to determine in what areas students and schools are successful in a given year and note areas for improvement. These reports also rank schools with regard to certain performance areas - academic achievement, college and career readiness, and student growth, along with several sub-categories in each area. Peer schools (Elementary and Junior-Senior High Schools) are chosen by the NJDOE by attempting to match schools based on factors such as: o % economically disadvantaged o % limited English proficiency o % special education o Grade span (elementary, middle, high) Academic achievement data reported includes: o NJASK (Elementary) o HSPA proficiency rates Junior-Senior High School) o Individualized NCLB progress targets College and Career Readiness (Elementary) data reported includes: o Chronic absenteeism (not present for more than 10% of the total days possible for that student for any reason) College and Career Readiness (Junior-Senior High School) data reported includes: o % of students participating in SAT o % of students participating in PSAT and/or ACT-Plan o % of students scoring above 1550 on SAT o % of students taking at least one AP test or IB test in English, mathematics, social studies, or science (NOTE: IB tests were not included in the 2011-12 performance reports) o % of AP tests in English, mathematics, social studies, or science with score of 3 or greater or IB test with a score of 4 or better (NOTE: IB tests were not included in the 2011-12 performance reports) o % of students participating in approved Career and Technical Programs Student Growth (Elementary) data reported includes: o Student growth percentiles, using a student s academic peers (other grade-level peers statewide who scored similarly the previous testing year) and the following year s achievement data for that academic peer group to determine each student s growth score (a percentile rank). Graduation and Postsecondary data reported includes:

o o Overall Graduation Rate Dropout Rate School wide median growth percentiles (for Elementary Schools), arrived at via ranking a school s student growth percentiles from highest to lowest, and finding the median. An example of an interpretation is as follows, from page 15 of the NJ School Performance Reports Interpretive Guide: A schoolwide growth score of 35 in language arts means that the median student s growth in language arts in the school was 35. The median is the point where half of the students in the school fall above and half fell below. A school is deemed to be making low growth if the growth score is below 35, typical growth if a score is between 35 and 65 and high growth if the score is greater than 65.(http://education.state.nj.us/pr/NJSchoolPerformance InterpretiveGuide.pdf). Concerns about Reporting Historical Data as Year-to-Year Comparison State test achievement trend data is presented for the past four years for each tested grade level. Caution should be exercised when making year-to-year comparisons based on what the state presents, since (in most cases) each year represents a different group of students with a possible different demographic makeup and other different contextual factors that impact performance. Locally, Woodbury makes year-to-year comparisons by examining cohort trends, which can be found in our publically available 2013-2014 District Student Performance Report: http://www.woodburysch.com/about/documents/districtstudentperformancereport2013-14performancedata.pdf. Concerns about Peer Schools and Categories as Indicators for Woodbury Jr-Sr High School Woodbury Junior-Senior High School serves students in grades 6 through 12. Of the 31 peer schools selected by the NJDOE for Woodbury, only one other school was a 6-12 building, and only 5 served grades 7 through 12. One was a charter school that served K through grade 12. Another concern is that even though this is titled a Woodbury Jr-Sr High report, with a 6 through 12 grade span, the indicators reported by the NJDOE within the report often only represent performance among the 9 through 12 population of students. For example, growth data is not captured in this report for students in grades 6 through 8 the same way it would be captured if a separate middle school or junior high report was produced. Conversely, NCLB progress target achievement presented in a fall NJDOE report was based on the achievement of the entire 6-12 population on NJASK; however, Academic Achievement Indicators for the school only list HSPA for Schoolwide Performance, making the percentage of targets met indicator misleading. This results in a very complicated, confusing performance report for the Junior-Senior High School. Please see complete report for more information about the growth of the grades 6 through 8 group of students. Summary of Data- EVERGREEN The chart below summarizes the percentage of Targets met by Evergreen in 2013-14 compared with the previous two school years.

For Academic Achievement, the percentage of targets met represents the percentage of progress targets met as defined by the NJDOE s NCLB waiver; that is, that the school will reduce by half the percentage of students schoolwide and in specified subgroups who were partially proficient in 2010-11 (baseline year) over the course of six years, using equal increments as annual targets. Note that this means the proficiency target is higher for each school year. For College and Career Readiness, the percentage of targets met represents whether the school was successful in meeting the statewide target of 6 percent of students (or fewer) missing 10 percent of the total days possible for that individual student during the school year. For Student Growth, the percentage of targets met represents whether the school s median growth score in language arts and mathematics for all students in the school met the statewide target of 35. EVERGREEN OVERALL PERFORMANCE Indicator % of Targets Met 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Academic Achievement 100% 50% 17% Language Arts 100% 0% 33% Mathematics 100% 100% 0% College and Career Readiness 0% 0% 0% Chronic Absenteeism 0% 0% 0% Student Growth 100% 100% 100% Language Arts 100% 100% 100% Mathematics 100% 100% 100% The charts that follow summarize peer group percentile ranking as well as performance of Evergreen on the various performance indicators in 2013-14 compared with the previous two years. Caution should be exercised, as peer schools change from year to year:

Summary of Data - WALNUT The chart below summarizes the percentage of Targets met by West End in 2013-14 compared with the previous two school years. For Academic Achievement, the percentage of targets met represents the percentage of progress targets met as defined by the NJDOE s NCLB waiver; that is, that the school will reduce by half the percentage of students schoolwide and in specified subgroups who were partially proficient in 2010-11 (baseline year) over the course of six years, using equal increments as annual targets. Note that this means the proficiency target is higher for each school year. For College and Career Readiness, the percentage of targets met represents whether the school was successful in meeting the statewide target of 6 percent of students (or fewer) missing 10 percent of the total days possible for that individual student during the school year. For Student Growth, the percentage of targets met represents whether the school s median growth score in language arts and mathematics for all students in the school met the statewide target of 35. WALNUT OVERALL PERFORMANCE Indicator % of Targets Met 2011-12 2012-13 2012-14 Academic Achievement 100% 100% 100% Language Arts 100% 100% 100% Mathematics 100% 100% 100% College and Career Readiness 0% 0% 0% Chronic Absenteeism 0% 0% 0% Student Growth 100% 100% 100% Language Arts 100% 100% 100% Mathematics 100% 100% 100% The charts that follow summarize peer group percentile ranking as well as performance of Walnut on the various performance indicators in 2013-14 compared with the previous two years. Caution should be exercised, as peer schools change from year to year:

Summary of Data WEST END The chart below summarizes the percentage of Targets met by West End in 2013-14 compared with the previous two school years. For Academic Achievement, the percentage of targets met represents the percentage of progress targets met as defined by the NJDOE s NCLB waiver; that is, that the school will reduce by half the percentage of students schoolwide and in specified subgroups who were partially proficient in 2010-11 (baseline year) over the course of six years, using equal increments as annual targets. Note that this means the proficiency target is higher for each school year. For College and Career Readiness, the percentage of targets met represents whether the school was successful in meeting the statewide target of 6 percent of students (or fewer) missing 10 percent of the total days possible for that individual student during the school year. For Student Growth, the percentage of targets met represents whether the school s median growth score in language arts and mathematics for all students in the school met the statewide target of 35. WEST END OVERALL PERFORMANCE Indicator % of Targets Met 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Academic Achievement 88% 60% 25% Language Arts 50% 20% 25% Mathematics 80% 100% 25% College and Career Readiness 0% 0% 0% Chronic Absenteeism 0% 0% 0% Student Growth 50% 0% 0% Language Arts 0% 0% 0% Mathematics 100% 0% 0% The charts that follow summarize peer group percentile ranking as well as performance of West End on the various performance indicators in 2013-14 compared with the previous two years. Caution should be exercised, as peer schools change from year to year:

Summary of Data JUNIOR-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL The chart below summarizes the percentage of Targets met by the Junior-Senior High School in 2013-14 compared with the previous two school years. For Academic Achievement, the percentage of targets met represents the percentage of progress targets met as defined by the NJDOE s NCLB waiver; that is, that the school will reduce by half the percentage of students schoolwide and in specified subgroups who were partially proficient in 2010-11 (baseline year) over the course of six years, using equal increments as annual targets. Note that this means the proficiency target is higher for each school year. For College and Career Readiness, the percentage of targets met represents whether the school was successful in meeting statewide targets for each indicator: 80% of students participating in SAT or ACT, 60% of students participating in PSAT or PLAN, 40% of students scoring above 1550 on SAT, 35% of students taking at least one AP or IB test in English, mathematics, social studies, or science, and 75% of tests greater than or equal to 3 (for AP tests) or 4 (for IB tests). For Graduation and Post Secondary, the percentage of targets met represents whether the succeeded in exceeding the statewide target of 75 percent for graduation rate, and stayed under the statewide target of no more than 2 percent for dropout rate. % of Targets Met JR-SR HIGH Indicator 2011-12 2012-13 2012-14 Academic Achievement 75% 83% 33% Language Arts 50% 67% 17% Mathematics 100% 100% 50% College and Career Readiness 40% 40% 20% % of Students Participating in SAT or ACT 0% 0% 0% % of students Participating in PSAT or PLAN 100% 100% 0% OVERALL % of Students Scoring about 1550 on SAT 0% 0% 0% PERFORMANCE % of Students Taking at least one AP Test of IB Test in English, Math, Social Studies, or 100% 100% 100% Science % of AP Tests >=3 or IB Test >= 4 in English, Math, Social Studies or Science 0% 0% 0% Graduation and Post-Secondary 50% 100% 50% Overall Graduation Rate 100% 100% 100% Dropout Rate* 0% 100% 0% *note: in 2013-14, the school missed the statewide target of 2.0% by 0.2 percentage point. The charts that follow summarize peer group percentile ranking as well as performance of the Junior- Senior High School on the various performance indicators in 2013-14 compared with the previous two years. Caution should be exercised, as peer schools change from year to year:

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Junior-Senior High Performance Report Graduation & Postsecondary Indicators (Statewide Rank) 2011-12 through 2013-14 39 24 25 24 19 Overall Graduation Rate 9 Dropout Rate Statewide Percentile 2011-12 Statewide Percentile 2012-13 Statewide Percentile 2013-14

APPENDIX NJDOE SCHOOL PERFORMANCE REPORTS Evergreen 2013-14 School Performance Report: http://www.state.nj.us/education/pr/1314/15/155860090.pdf Walnut 2013-14 School Performance Report: http://www.state.nj.us/education/pr/1314/15/155860100.pdf West End 2013-14 School Performance Report: http://www.state.nj.us/education/pr/1314/15/155860110.pdf Junior-Senior High School 2013-14 School Performance Report: http://www.state.nj.us/education/pr/1314/15/155860050.pdf