Importance of Shared Governance. President s Cabinet Presentation October 27, 2009 Rita Cepeda, Ed.D, President Mesa College

Similar documents
P A S A D E N A C I T Y C O L L E G E SHARED GOVERNANCE

Adult Education ACCE Presentation. Neil Kelly February 2, 2017

The Role of Trustee. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education Seeking student trustee candidates at Slippery Rock University

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

POLITECNICO DI MILANO

Pennsylvania Association of Councils of Trustees THE ROLE OF TRUSTEE IN PENNSYLVANIA S STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION

1) AS /AA (Rev): Recognizing the Integration of Sustainability into California State University (CSU) Academic Endeavors

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

State Budget Update February 2016

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

Public Comments (2 minute limit per person) AS Executive Board Reports (15 minutes)

CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY M. J. NEELEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION & TENURE AND FACULTY EVALUATION GUIDELINES 9/16/85*

St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Faculty Voice Task Force 5: Fixed Term Faculty. November 1, 2006

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Faculty governance especially the

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG WORKING PARTY ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE REVIEW PANEL ON UNIVERSITY GOVERNANCE. Report of the Working Party

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

Pattern of Administration. For the Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering The Ohio State University Revised: 6/15/2012

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

EUA Annual Conference Bergen. University Autonomy in Europe NOVA University within the context of Portugal

b) Allegation means information in any form forwarded to a Dean relating to possible Misconduct in Scholarly Activity.

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

ARTICLE IV: STUDENT ACTIVITIES

Program Change Proposal:

SEARCH PROSPECTUS: Dean of the College of Law

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR PRINCIPAL SAINTS CATHOLIC COLLEGE JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY

TITLE IX COMPLIANCE SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY. Audit Report June 14, Henry Mendoza, Chair Steven M. Glazer William Hauck Glen O.

Hamline University. College of Liberal Arts POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Approved Academic Titles

11 CONTINUING EDUCATION

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Instructions and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure Review of IUB Librarians

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO. Audit Report June 11, 2014

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

REFERENCE FRAMEWORK FOR THE TRAINING OF COOPERATING TEACHERS AND UNIVERSITY SUPERVISORS. (Abridged version)

College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer Science

PATTERN OF ADMINISTRATION

2. Related Documents (refer to policies.rutgers.edu for additional information)

Power Systems Engineering

Accommodation for Students with Disabilities

MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REGULATIONS PURPOSE

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Arizona County Community College Districts and Colleges of Qualifying Indian Tribes Year Ended June 30, 2013

Office of Graduate Studies 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA NEW GRADUATE STUDENT ORIENTATION CIVIL ENGINEERING

Anglia Ruskin University Assessment Offences

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

University of Toronto

GENERAL INFORMATION STUDIES DEGREE PROGRAMME PERIOD OF EXECUTION SCOPE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE OF STUDY CODE DEGREE

Comprehensive Student Services Program Review

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

Amin U. Sarkar. Cornell University/NY State United University Professions (UUP) Leadership Institute, 2001, New Paltz, New York

Academic Program Assessment Prior to Implementation (Policy and Procedures)

Article 15 TENURE. A. Definition

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Chief Academic Officer s Guidelines For Preparing and Reviewing Promotion and Tenure Dossiers

Intellectual Property

California State University EAP Updates 2016

MANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM

Curriculum for the Academy Profession Degree Programme in Energy Technology

BRAG PACKET RECOMMENDATION GUIDELINES

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

University of Michigan - Flint POLICY ON FACULTY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT

District Superintendent

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

STANISLAUS COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY CASE #08-04 LA GRANGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Transcription:

Importance of Shared Governance President s Cabinet Presentation October 27, 2009 Rita Cepeda, Ed.D, President Mesa College

AB1725: A Little History 1989 Legislative Act after 5 years of study Objectives of Legislation Established the California Community Colleges as segment of California Higher Education Defined the Mission of Community Colleges and the Priorities within that Mission. Defined the role/governance relationship between the Board of Governors (system) and the Board of Trustees (local). Offered funding to enable colleges to improve program quality and meet standards (Program based funding) such as 75/25 full time credit faculty

Governance Structure: State System Local From Legislation (AB 1725) amendable only by subsequent legislation to System wide Regulation(Title 5) amendable by Board of Governors action to local district implementation through district policy, regulation that must at minimum meet the letter and spirit of Title 5

CCC Reform: Characteristics of a Segment of Postsecondary Education K 12 like credentials repealed New minimum qualifications (MQs and FSAs are Born) to ensure students and transfer partners of faculty expertise. Tenure period set at four years Required faculty evaluation and peer review Validated the need for Staff Development Set diversity objectives

Another Interesting Legal Provision Evaluation of Faculty and Administrators Ed Code 87663 It is the intent of the Legislature that faculty evaluation include, to the extent practicable, student evaluation. It is the intent of the Legislature that evaluation of administrators include, to the extent practicable, faculty evaluation.

Intent of Reform In short... AB 1725 aimed to Enhance the community college image Increase/change funding structure Clearly move from K 12 to higher education Develop a more unified system Establish processes for institutional renewal

Participants in Governance and Their Role The System (Board of Governors) The District (Board of Trustees) Administrators (Designees of Board) Faculty Students Staff

The Law and Participatory Governance (Education Code Sections 70901 and 70902) Board of Governors shall establish "minimum standards and local governing boards shall "establish procedures not inconsistent" with those standards to ensure: faculty, staff and students the right to participate effectively in district and college governance and the right of academic senates to assume primary responsibility for making recommendations in the areas of curriculum and academic standards.

What does Participating Effectively Mean? Participating effectively in district and college governance requires inclusive involvement in the decision making process. It does not imply total agreement; It does not require the same level of involvement by all; Final decisions rest with the local board of trustees or designee.

Regulations Regarding Academic Senates (see Title 5 53203) The governing board shall adopt policies for appropriate delegation of authority and responsibility to its academic senate. providing at a minimum the governing board or its designees consult collegially with the academic senate when adopting policies and procedures on academic and professional matters.

Effective Faculty Participation in Governance: Outcomes grants faculty a louder voice through its academic senate requires faculty to seek and consider the informed views of students and staff requires policy makers to rely primarily on the recommendations of faculty senates or to reach mutual agreement with them requires faculty senates and faculty unions to consult with one another on certain matters

Rely Primarily or Mutually Agree The local board must adopt procedures identifying how it will consult collegially in these eleven areas; either to rely primarily upon the advice and judgment of the academic senate or to reach mutual agreement. It is recommended, although not required, that the specific procedure selected be identified in policy for each of the academic and professional matters.

Rely Primarily/Mutual Agreement: Definition rely primarily procedure is normally supposed to accept recommendations of the senate in any areas so designated, unless there are exceptional circumstances and compelling reasons. mutual agreement procedure implies that the Board is supposed to reach written agreement with the senate in any areas so designated.

Regulations: Areas of Participation for Faculty:10 + 1 (Title 5 53200) "Academic and professional matters" means the following policy development and implementation matters: 1. Degree and certificate requirements 2. Curriculum, including establishing prerequisites and placing courses within disciplines 3. Grading policies 4. Educational program development 5. Standards or policies regarding student preparation and success

10 + 1 (cont d) 6. District and college governance structures, as related to faculty roles 7. Faculty roles and involvement in accreditation processes, including self study and annual reports 8. Policies for faculty professional development activities 9. Processes for program review 10. Processes for institutional planning and budget development, and 11. Other academic and professional matters as mutually agreed upon between the governing board and the academic senate.

Regulations Regarding Student Participation (Title 5 51023.7) Governing board adopts policies and procedures that provide students opportunity to participate effectively in district and college governance. formulation and development of selected policies and procedures and processes for jointly developing recommendations that have or will have a significant effect on students. Board shall not take action on a matter having a significant effect on students until: recommendations and positions by students are given every reasonable consideration.

Regulations Specific to Student Participation (Title 5 51023.7) (1) grading polices; (2) codes of student conduct; (3) academic disciplinary policies; (4) curriculum development (5) courses or programs which should be initiated or discontinued; (6) processes for institutional planning and budget development; (7) standards and polices regarding student preparation and success; (8) student services planning and development; (9) student fees within the authority of the district to adopt; (10) any other district and college policy, procedure or related matter that the district governing board determines will have a significant effect on students a (11)policies and procedures pertaining to the hiring and evaluation of faculty, administration, and staff.

Overlapping Student/Faculty Concerns (1) grading polices; (2) codes of student conduct; (3) academic disciplinary policies; (4) curriculum development (5) courses or programs which should be initiated or discontinued; (6) processes for institutional planning and budget development; (7) standards and polices regarding student preparation and success; (8) student services planning and development; (9) student fees within the authority of the district to adopt; (10) Other district/college policy that the board determines will have a significant impact on students Grading policies Curriculum, including prerequisites Educational program development Processes for institutional planning and budget development Standards or policies regarding student preparation and success; Other academic and professional matters as mutually agreed upon between the governing board and the academic senate.

Regulations Regarding Staff Participation (Title 5 51023.5) Governing board must adopt policies and procedures that provide staff opportunity to participate effectively in district and college governance. formulation and development of policies and procedures, and processes for jointly developing recommendations that have or will have a significant effect on staff. Board shall not take action on matters significantly affecting staff until the recommendations and opinions of staff are given every reasonable consideration.

Regulations Specific to Staff Participation ( 51023.5. Staff). (1) Participation in development of structures, procedures and definitions or categories of positions or groups other than faculty that compose the staff of the college(s) and district. (2) Participation in the formulation and development of district and college policies and procedures that have or will have a significant effect on staff (3) Selection/nomination of staff representatives to serve on college and district task forces, committees, or other governance groups. (4) Staff roles and involvement in the accreditation process including selfstudy and annual reports (5) Policies for staff professional development activities (6) Institutional planning and budget development processes

SDCCD Participatory Governance Policy (BP 2510 Participation in Local Decision Making) Rely Primarily Upon ACADEMIC SENATES 1. Curriculum, including establishing prerequisites and placing courses within disciplines 2. Degree and certificate requirements 3. Grading policies 4. Educational program development 5. Standards or policies regarding student preparation and success 6. District and college governance structures, as related to faculty roles* 7. Faculty roles and involvement in accreditation processes, including self study and annual reports 8. Processes for institutional planning and budget development *Refers to number, make up and nature of committees in the governance structure and the Role faculty plays in these.

BP 2510 Participation in Local Decision Making (cont d) Mutual agreement with the Academic Senates The Board shall attempt to reach mutual agreement with the Academic Senates for the following policy development. 9. Policies for faculty professional development activities 10. Processes for program review; and 11. Other academic and professional matters as mutually agreed upon between the Governing Board and the Academic Senates.

BP 2510 Participation in Local Decision Making (cont d) STUDENTS The Board will usually not take action on a matter having a "significant effect on students. District policies that have a significant effect on students include: 1) grading policies; 2) codes of student conduct; 3) academic disciplinary policies; 4) curriculum development; 5) courses or programs which should be initiated or discontinued; 6) process for institutional planning and budget development; 7) standards and policies regarding student preparation and success, 8) student services planning and development; 9) student fees within the authority of the district to adopt; and 10) any other district and college policy, procedure or related matter that the district governing board determines will have a significant effect on students.

BP 2510 Participation in Local Decision Making (cont d) STAFF DEFINITIONS Staff: shall include all non supervisory Classified staff, supervisory staff and management staff. Except in unforeseeable, emergency situations, the Governing board shall not take action on matter significantly affecting staff until it has provided staff an opportunity to participate in the formulation and development of those matters. Staff will be included in appropriate committees, councils, advisory groups and other structures at all sites in order to participate in the formulation and development of matters which impact staff. Procedures shall be distributed by the Chancellor to implement districtwide participating of staff in shared governance.

The Ultimate Aim: Collegiality and Educational Excellence In short, participatory governance is not a simple process to implement goodwill, thoughtful people, a willingness to take risks and the ability to admit problems exist can go far toward establishing a positive environment. The central objective should be creation of a climate where energy is devoted to solving crucial educational tasks... Source: CCCT/CEOCCC Policy Paper, December 1989

References Walton, Ian and Morris, Wanda, Participating Effectively in District and College Governance: Student Responsibilities; Student Leadership Institute, San Jose, CA 2004 Briones, Benita; Plyley, Cari; California Community Colleges Classified Senate (4CS); Diablo Valley College, April 7, 2009 Lovas John C and Kanter, Marta Shared, Governance the Next Generation, Annual International Education of the League for Innovation in Community Colleges; July 1994 The Academic Senate for California Community Colleges and The Community College League of California, Participating Effectively in District and College Governance; Adopted Fall 1998 Smith, Cindra, Director of Education Services, Advisory Committee on Education Services Perspectives on the Role of Student Trustees, October 1998; Updated May 2006.