FY2016 School Grade Rule

Similar documents
College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

FTE General Instructions

FLORIDA. -Mindingall. Portilla Dr. Wilbert. endent of School. Superinte. Associate Curriculum. Assistant

District English Language Learners (ELL) Plan

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Charter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

Sancta Familia. Home Academy Handbook

Math Placement at Paci c Lutheran University

Pathways to College Preparatory Advanced Academic Offerings in the Anchorage School District

INTRODUCTION ( MCPS HS Course Bulletin)

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Middle School Parent/Student Handbook

AB 167/216 Graduation. kids-alliance.org/programs/education. Alliance for Children s Rights

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

CLEARWATER HIGH SCHOOL

WINSTON CHURCHILL HIGH SCHOOL. 9 th Grade Registration Information

The Sarasota County Pre International Baccalaureate International Baccalaureate Programs at Riverview High School

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS A $10.00 fee will be assessed for all computer education classes.

African American Male Achievement Update

Bachelor of Science. Undergraduate Program. Department of Physics

Educational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Essays on the Economics of High School-to-College Transition Programs and Teacher Effectiveness. Cecilia Speroni

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

ASCD Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind

Dual Enrollment Informational Session

TA Certification Course Additional Information Sheet

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Mathematics Levels 12 14

Dublin City Schools Career and College Ready Academies FAQ. General

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

World s Best Workforce Plan

COLLEGE ACCESS LESSON PLAN AND HANDOUTS

Bellehaven Elementary

Bethune-Cookman University

Race to the Top (RttT) Monthly Report for US Department of Education (USED) NC RttT February 2014

Math 4 Units Algebra I, Applied Algebra I or Algebra I Pt 1 and Algebra I Pt 2

AGENDA ITEM VI-E October 2005 Page 1 CHAPTER 13. FINANCIAL PLANNING

Financing Education In Minnesota

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Student Handbook. Supporting Today s Students with the Technology of Tomorrow

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Using Proportions to Solve Percentage Problems I

Heritage High School Home of the Coyotes. Class of 2017 Registration for Senior Classes

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Steve Miller UNC Wilmington w/assistance from Outlines by Eileen Goldgeier and Jen Palencia Shipp April 20, 2010

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

Educational Attainment

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

Admission ADMISSIONS POLICIES APPLYING TO BISHOP S UNIVERSITY. Application Procedure. Application Deadlines. CEGEP Applicants

A Comparison of State of Florida Charter Technical Career Centers to District Non-Charter Career Centers,

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Common Course Numbering: Foundations Courses

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

A Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

ADVANCED AND HONORS DIPLOMAS (BEGINNING WITH THE GRADUATING CLASS OF 2013)

Senior Parent Meeting What s next?

FOUR STARS OUT OF FOUR

CST Readiness: Targeting Bubble Students

Bayless High School Career & Educational Planning Guide

Testing for the Homeschooled High Schooler: SAT, ACT, AP, CLEP, PSAT, SAT II

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Miami Central Senior High School Academy of Finance

Reforms for selection procedures fundamental programmes and SB grant. June 2017

Brandon Alternative School

McNeese State University University of Louisiana System. GRAD Act Annual Report FY

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

English English 1,2,3,4 Textbooks used as a resource Using new curriculum - building novel library editions. rbooks - consumables

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Oakland Terrace School For The Visual And Performing Arts

Transcription:

FY2016 School Grade Rule Principals Leadership Academy Mark Howard May 17, 2016 Slides adapted from FDOE presentation http://l.sdpbc.net/klovi Top-performing urban school district in Florida

New School Grades Model Reminder of Key Differences No Bonus Points or Weighting No weighted learning gains or accelerated exams No safety net preventing dropping 2 letter grades No bonus points for students passing retakes No Letter Grade Penalties No drop in letter grade if less than 50% of students in the bottom quartile make learning gains No drop in letter grade if less than 25% of their students were reading on grade level

FY2016 Accountability Rules Provides a focus on achievement, growth, students needing the most support and student acceleration (middle & high) Schools only graded on components with data, must have 10 or more students Each component worth 100 points

FY2016 Accountability Rules Must test 95% of FTE Survey 3 students (calculate for each test, then aggregate) ELL students included in Achievement after 2 years (based on DEUSS date) NEW Learning Gains Model Grades reported as percentage of points

FY16 School Grade Scale All Models (Elementary, Middle, High, Combination) A = 62% B = 54% - 61% C = 41% - 53% D = 32% - 40% F = 31% or less

School Grade Models Elementary, Middle, High, Combination

Elementary School Grades Model (A maximum of 7 components) English/ Language Arts Achievement Mathematics Achievement Science Achievement Learning Gains Learning Gains Learning Gains of Low 25% Learning Gains of Low 25%

Middle School Grades Model (A maximum of 9 components). English/ Language Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies (Civics EOC) Acceleration Success Achievement Achievement Achievement (0%to 100%) Achievement Learning Gains Learning Gains of Low 25% Learning Gains Learning Gains of Low 25% Percentage of students who pass H.S. EOCs and industry certifications

High School Grades Model (A maximum of 10 components English/ Language Arts Mathematics (EOCs) Science (Biology EOC) Social Studies (US History EOC) Graduation Rate Acceleration Success Achievement Learning Gains Learning Gains of Low 25% Achievement Learning Gains Learning Gains of Low 25% Achievement Achievement Federal 4-year Graduation Rate Percent of graduates who are eligible to earn college credit through passing AP, IB, or AICE exams; passing dual enrollment courses; or earning an industry certification

Combination School Model (A maximum of 11 components) English/ Language Arts Achievement Learning Gains Learning Gains of Low 25% Mathematics (EOCs) Achievement Learning Gains Science (Biology 1 EOC) Achievement Social Studies (EOCs) Achievement Graduation Rate Federal 4-year Grad Rate Acceleration Success High School (AP, IB, AICE, dual enrollment or industry certification) Learning Gains of Low 25% Middle School (EOCs or industry certifications)

Subject Areas Included for Achievement Percentage of Full-Year-Enrolled Students who scored Level 3+ SUBJECT GRADES ASSESSMENT English Language Arts Grades 3-10 FSA, FSAA Mathematics Grades 3-8 Algebra 1, Geometry Algebra 2* Science Grades 5 and 8 Biology 1 Social Studies Civics* US History* FSA, FSAA FSA,FSAA EOC FSA EOC FCAT, FSAA FSA EOC, FSAA EOC FSA EOC FSA EOC Note: For EOCs a student must be enrolled in the course to be counted in achievement. *FSAA Algebra 2, Civics and US History to be introduced in FY17.

Learning Gains Model Beginning in FY2016

New Learning Gains Model F.S. 1008.34 New model requires growth toward achievement levels 3, 4, and 5 is demonstrated by students who scored below each of those levels in the prior year. Reflect What does this mean for students scoring at levels 1 and 2? What does this mean for students scoring at levels 3 and 4? What does this mean for retained students? What does this mean for students testing above grade level?

Learning Gains Model The line below represents a student growth pattern consistent with the statute and the approved rule. 260 Student scoring mid Level 1 in Grade 3 and earning a learning gain each year. 240 Level 3 Level 3 Level 3 220 Level 3 Level 3 Level 3 Level 2 Level 3 Level 2 Level 2 Level 2 Level 2 200 Level 3 Level 2 Level 2 180 Level 2 160 140 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10

Comparison of Learning Gains Old Method Improve one or more levels from one year to the next (e.g., move from Level 1 to Level 2; Level 2 to Level 4, etc.) LEVEL 1 & 2 For students who remain in Level 1 or 2, demonstrate a specified scale gain LEVEL 3 & 4 Maintain a Level 3, Level 4, or Level 5 from one year to the next New Method No change Split Levels 1 & 2 into sub-sections Level 1 into thirds Level 2 in half Then, require student to improve from section to section within Level (e.g., move from the bottom third of Level 1 to the middle third of Level 1) Level 3 & Level 4, in addition to maintaining the level, student scale score must improve

FSA Reading, Math/EOC Learning Gains All Levels: Increase 1+ Level Level 5: Remain Level 5 Level 4: Maintain level and improve 1 or more points Level 3: Maintain level and improve 1 or more points Level 2: Move from sub-level to higher sub-level Level 1: Move from sub-level to higher sub-level Remain Level 5 Maintain +1 Pt Maintain +1 Pt FSA Achievement Levels L5 L4 L3 L2 L1

English Language Arts Learning Gains Scale Grade Level 1 Level 2 Level 1 Low Middle High Level 2 Low High Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Grade 3 240-284 240-254 255-269 270-284 285-299 285-292 293-299 300-314 315-329 330-360 Grade 4 251-296 251-266 267-281 282-296 297-310 297-303 304-310 311-324 325-339 340-372 Grade 5 257-303 257-272 273-288 289-303 304-320 304-312 313-320 321-335 336-351 352-385 Grade 6 259-308 259-275 276-292 293-308 309-325 309-317 318-325 326-338 339-355 356-391 Grade 7 267-317 267-283 284-300 301-317 318-332 318-325 326-332 333-345 346-359 360-397 Grade 8 274-321 274-289 290-305 306-321 322-336 322-329 330-336 337-351 352-365 366-403 Grade 9 276-327 276-293 294-310 311-327 328-342 328-335 336-342 343-354 355-369 370-407 Grade 10 284-333 284-300 301-317 318-333 334-349 334-341 342-349 350-361 362-377 378-412

Mathematics Learning Gains Scale Grade Level 1 Level 2 Level 1 Low Middle High Level 2 Low High Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Grade 3 240-284 240-254 255-269 270-284 285-296 285-290 291-296 297-310 311-326 327-360 Grade 4 251-298 251-266 267-282 283-298 299-309 299-304 305-309 310-324 325-339 340-376 Grade 5 256-305 256-272 273-289 290-305 306-319 306-312 313-319 320-333 334-349 350-388 Grade 6 260-309 260-276 277-293 294-309 310-324 310-317 318-324 325-338 339-355 356-390 Grade 7 269-315 269-284 285-300 301-315 316-329 316-322 323-329 330-345 346-359 360-391 Grade 8 273-321 273-289 290-305 306-321 322-336 322-329 330-336 337-352 353-364 365-393 End-of-Course Assessments Grade Level 1 Level 2 Level 1 Low Middle High Level 2 Low High Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Algebra 1 425-486 425-445 446-466 467-486 487-496 487-491 492-496 497-517 518-531 532-575 Geometry 425-485 425-445 446-465 466-485 486-498 486-492 493-498 499-520 521-532 533-575 Algebra 2 425-496 425-448 449-472 473-496 497-510 497-503 504-510 511-528 529-536 537-575

Lowest 25% Learning Gains Applies same Learning Gains methodology to the Lowest 25% To determine the Lowest 25% Use the scale score performance of students in the prior year at each grade level to identify the lowest 25% of students (EOCs not by grade level) Lowest 25% is no longer limited to students in Achievement Levels 1 and 2 Calculated for both ELA and Mathematics

Activity

Learning Gains Examples FY2015 Test FY2015 Score FY2016 Test FY2016 Score to be a Gain 1. Grade 3 FSA ELA 250 Grade 3 FSA ELA 2.. Grade 3 FSA ELA 250 Grade 4 FSA ELA 3. Grade 5 FSA ELA 338 Grade 6 FSA ELA 4. Grade 5 FSA Math 325 Grade 7 FSA Math 5. Grade 7 FSA Math 340 Algebra 1 EOC 6. Grade 8 FSA Math 324 Algebra 1 EOC 7. Algebra 1 EOC 500 Geometry EOC 8. Geometry EOC 470 Algebra 2 EOC 9. Algebra 1 EOC 445 Grade 8 FSA Math

FSA Learning Gains (LG) Examples What minimum FSA score does: 1. a retained grade 3 student who scored 250 on Grade 3 ELA in 2015 need to earn a LG on the 2016 Grade 3 ELA? 2. a grade 4 student who scored 250 on Grade 3 ELA in 2015 need to earn a LG on the 2016 Grade 4 ELA? 3. a grade 6 student who scored 338 on the Grade 5 ELA in 2015 need to earn a LG on the 2016 Grade 6 ELA? 4. a grade 6 student who scored 325 on the Grade 5 Math in 2015 need to earn a LG on the 2016 Grade 7 Math?

EOC Learning Gains (LG) Examples What minimum FSA score does: 5. an Algebra 1 student who scored 340 on the Grade 7 Math in 2015 need to earn a LG on the 2016 Algebra 1 EOC? 6. an Algebra 1 student who scored 324 on the Grade 8 Math in 2015 need to earn a LG on the 2016 Algebra 1 EOC? 7. a Geometry student who scored 500 on the Algebra 1 EOC in 2015 need to earn a LG on the 2016 Geometry EOC? 8. an Algebra 2 student who scored 470 on the Geometry EOC in 2015 need to earn a LG on the 2016 Algebra 2 EOC? 9. a grade 8 student who scored 445 on the Algebra 1 EOC in 2015 need to earn a LG on the 2016 Grade 8 Math?

Learning Gains Examples FY2015 Test FY2015 Score FY2016 Test FY2016 Score to be a Gain 1. Grade 3 FSA ELA 250 Grade 3 FSA ELA 255 2.. Grade 3 FSA ELA 250 Grade 4 FSA ELA 267 3. Grade 5 FSA ELA 338 Grade 6 FSA ELA 339 4. Grade 5 FSA Math 325 Grade 7 FSA Math 330 5. Grade 7 FSA Math 340 Algebra 1 EOC 497 6. Grade 8 FSA Math 324 Algebra 1 EOC 492 7. Algebra 1 EOC 500 Geometry EOC 501 8. Geometry EOC 470 Algebra 2 EOC 497 9. Algebra 1 EOC 445 Grade 8 FSA Math 290

Acceleration

Middle School Acceleration Component Numerator: Denominator: Students who passed High School EOC Students who (prior year) passed High School Industry Certification Grade 8, with Prior Year Level 3+ Math Grade 6-8 taking HS EOC or (prior year) Industry Certification Note: Rule not limited to HS Math EOCs A student is included in the calculation no more than once Students must be enrolled in EOC course to be included

Middle School Acceleration Component Numerator: Denominator: Students who passed High School EOC Students who (prior year) passed High School Industry Certification Grade 8, with Prior Year Level 3+ Math Grade 6-8 taking HS EOC or (prior year) Industry Certification Note: Rule not limited to HS Math EOCs A student is included in the calculation no more than once Students must be enrolled in EOC course to be included

High School College and Career Acceleration Component Numerator: Denominator: Passed AP, IB, AICE, Dual Enrollment* Industry Certification (CAPE) Graduates from Federal Graduation Rate Cohort *Final Grade of C or Higher Note: Lagging indicator using prior year student data Students must be enrolled in EOC course to be included

High School College and Career Acceleration Component Numerator: Denominator: Passed AP, IB, AICE, Dual Enrollment* Industry Certification (CAPE) Graduates from Federal Graduation Rate Cohort *Final Grade of C or Higher Note: Lagging indicator using prior year student data Students must be enrolled in EOC course to be included

Next Steps

How do you utilize people, time and money to get results? Accountability Data Corrections Review Master Boards, Enrollment and Ind. Certs. for Current Year Practices Plan for Master Boards and Course Registration for Success Next Year

Accountability Data Corrections 1. Student Data Updates (EOC Course Withdraw) 2. Prior Year Data Corrections 3. College and Career Acceleration District makes corrections first Schools notified to review, verify and update as needed Short turn-around

District Grade District Report Card

District Grade Model (A maximum of 11 components) English/ Language Arts Mathematics (EOCs) Science (Biology 1 EOC) Social Studies (EOCs) Grad Rate Acceleration Success Achievement Learning Gains Achievement Learning Gains Achievement Achievement Federal 4-year Cohort Grad Rate High School (AP, IB, AICE, dual enroll or industry certification) Learning Gains of the Low 25% Learning Gains of the Low 25% Middle School (EOCs or industry certifications)

2015 District Grade Urban Seven Districts DISTRICT ELA MA SCI SOC STUD MS ACCEL GRAD RATE 13-14 HS ACCEL 13-14 TOT % PTS 2015 GRADE (RANK) (1) (1) (1) (2) PALM BEACH 55 56 61 69 62 78 60 441 63 A BROWARD 55 55 55 67 60 74 57 423 60 B DADE 55 51 54 62 64 77 63 426 61 B DUVAL 48 46 54 61 62 74 60 405 58 B HILLSBOROUGH 52 53 56 72 79 73 48 433 62 A ORANGE 54 52 59 67 71 75 44 422 60 B PINELLAS 52 52 58 67 68 76 49 422 60 B (5) (1) (2) (1) (1)

District Report Card Information required by s.1008.345(5) F.S 1. Percentage of students with growth in ELA and Math - by school and grade level 2. Percentage of students in highest and lowest quartile making growth in ELA and Math - by school and grade level 3. Progress in demonstrating learning gains of its highest performing students 4. Success improving student attendance 5. Grade-level promotion of students scoring levels 1 and 2 on the ELA and Math

District Report Card (continued) Information required by s.1008.345(5) F.S 6. Progress in closing the achievement gap in both ELA and Math 7. Performance preparing students for transition from Elem to MS, MS to HS and HS to postsecondary institutions and careers 8. Intervention and support strategies used by districts whose students in the highest and lowest quartiles exceed state average 9. Intervention and support strategies used by school boards whose DJJ programs with growth in ELA and Math exceed state average

QUESTIONS? http://l.sdpbc.net/klovi