School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Engage Educate Empower

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Shelters Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Val Verde Unified School District

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Kahului Elementary School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Hokulani Elementary School

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Val Verde Unified School District

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

African American Male Achievement Update

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

University of Arizona

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

CDS Code

12-month Enrollment

Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Cuero Independent School District

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

World s Best Workforce Plan

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Educational Attainment

Raw Data Files Instructions

Best Colleges Main Survey

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

Clark Lane Middle School

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

and Beyond! Evergreen School District PAC February 1, 2012

Conroe Independent School District


Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

46 Children s Defense Fund

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Transcription:

---- Bonita Elementary School 425 Fink Road Crowslanding 2098374401 Grades K-5 Brandi Petersen, Principal bpetersen@nclusd.k12.ca.us http://bonita.nclusd.org/ 2017-18 School Accountability Report Card Published During the 2018-19 School Year ---- ---- - --- Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District 1223 Main St. Newman, CA 95360 (209) 862-2933 www.nclusd.k12.ca.us District Governing Board Janice Conforti President RoseLee Hurst Paul Wallace, Clerk Tim Bazar Vernon Snodderly District Administration Randy Fillpot Superintendent Ryan Smith Director of Human Resources 2017-18 School Kim Accountability Bettencourt Report Card for Bonita Elementary School Page 1 of 9 Director of Curriculum and

School Description Located in Crows Landing, California, we are one of six traditional schools in the Newman- Crows Landing Unified School District. We are also the smallest of the four elementary schools in the district. We have 144 students. 17% are English Learners, 50% are low socioeconomic and less than 8% are special education students. The small student body provides parents with a greater opportunity for personal involvement in their child s education. The staff of Bonita Elementary School is committed to creating and maintaining an orderly, trusting, and caring environment where teaching and learning are exciting and students are assisted as they develop responsibility. All aspects of the school's organization, curricular, and co-curricular activities are child centered and designed to accommodate individual learning styles so that all may experience success. The Bonita Learning Community believes that all learners must become: About the SARC By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. 2017-18 Student Enrollment by Grade Level Grade Level *Effective Communicators who will use verbal, written, artistic and technological forms of communication to give, send, and receive information. *Inspired Learners who are accountable for demonstrating, assessing, and directing their present and life-long intellectual growth. *Productive Workers who perform collaboratively and independently to create quality products and services that reflect personal pride and responsibility. *Responsible Citizens who have a global and multi-cultural perspective, and who take the initiative for improving the quality of life for self and others. *Resourceful Thinkers who independently and creatively strive to solve complex problems through reflection, risk taking, and critical evaluation. As we move forward this year will will focus on the following areas: Literacy accross all content areas, Technology Integration, Math Improvement, Facilities that are safe and welcoming, Positive Relationships with/between parents, students, teachers and administration. Number of Students Kindergarten 18 Grade 1 21 Grade 2 30 Grade 3 17 Grade 4 33 Grade 5 26 Total Enrollment 145 2017-18 Student Enrollment by Group Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American 4.8 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0 Asian 0.7 Filipino 2.1 Hispanic or Latino 50.3 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.0 White 35.2 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 52.4 English Learners 15.9 Students with Disabilities 9.7 Foster Youth 0.0 A. Conditions of Learning 2017-18 School Accountability Report Card for Bonita Elementary School Page 2 of 9

State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair Teacher Credentials Bonita Elementary School 16-17 17-18 18-19 With Full Credential 6 6 6 Without Full Credential 1 1 1 Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 0 0 0 Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District 16-17 17-18 18-19 With Full Credential 138 Without Full Credential 19 Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 0 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions at this School Bonita Elementary School 16-17 17-18 18-19 Teachers of English Learners 0 0 0 Total Teacher Misassignments 0 0 0 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 0 * Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. *Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. 2017-18 School Accountability Report Card for Bonita Elementary School Page 3 of 9

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2018-19) Bonita Elementary School has district-adopted texts in English Language Arts, Math, Social Studies and Science. Core Curriculum Area Textbooks and Instructional Materials Year and month in which data were collected: August 2018 Textbooks and Instructional Materials/Year of Adoption Reading/Language Arts Benchmark Advance/Adelante 2017 The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Yes Percent of students lacking their own assigned textbook: 0 Mathematics Engage NY Math/August 2014 The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Yes Percent of students lacking their own assigned textbook: 0 Science K-2: Foss Science/2007 3-5: Houghton Mifflin California Science/2007 History-Social Science The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Yes Percent of students lacking their own assigned textbook: 0 Reflection/Harcourt: California Series/2006 The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Yes Percent of students lacking their own assigned textbook: 0 Science Laboratory Equipment N/A The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year) Our overall rating was 96.49% with a school rating of GOOD N/A System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: 8/29/18 Repair Status XFair Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned #6 Dead flies on window sill Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains XFair #9 Classroom drinking fountain not working Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials XFair #10 Fire Extinguisher not inspected Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences Overall Rating ---------- XFair 2017-18 School Accountability Report Card for Bonita Elementary School Page 4 of 9

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for students in the general education population and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] and mathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. Only eligible students may participate in the administration of the CAAs. CAAs items are aligned with alternate achievement standards, which are linked with the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities); and The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study Subject 2017-18 CAASPP Results for All Students Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards (grades 3-8 and 11) School District State 16-17 17-18 16-17 17-18 16-17 17-18 ELA 66.0 68.0 41.0 41.0 48.0 50.0 Math 34.0 51.0 24.0 25.0 37.0 38.0 Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Subject CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State 16-17 17-18 16-17 17-18 16-17 17-18 Science N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Note: The 2016 17 and 2017 18 data are not available. The CDE is developing a new science assessment based on the Next Generation Science Standards for California Public Schools (CA NGSS). The CAST was pilot-tested in spring 2017 and field-tested in spring 2018. The CAST will be administered operationally during the 2018 19 school year. The CAA for Science was pilot-tested for two years (i.e., 2016 17 and 2017 18) and the CAA for Science will be field-tested in 2018 19. Note: Science test results include the CAST and the CAA for Science. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the CAST plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAA for Science divided by the total number of students who participated on both assessments. State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8): Pupil outcomes in the subject area of physical education Grade 2017-18 Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards Level 4 of 6 5 of 6 6 of 6 ---5--- 19.2 26.9 26.9 * Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: ELA and mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. 2017-18 School Accountability Report Card for Bonita Elementary School Page 5 of 9

Student Group School Year 2017-18 CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA) Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 78 78 100.00 67.95 Male 41 41 100.00 65.85 Female 37 37 100.00 70.27 Black or African American -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 35 35 100.00 60.00 White 29 29 100.00 75.86 Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 34 34 100.00 55.88 English Learners 16 16 100.00 81.25 Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. 2017-18 School Accountability Report Card for Bonita Elementary School Page 6 of 9

Student Group School Year 2017-18 CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 78 78 100 51.28 Male 41 41 100 48.78 Female 37 37 100 54.05 Black or African American -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 35 35 100 40 White 29 29 100 68.97 Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 34 34 100 41.18 English Learners 16 16 100 43.75 Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each school site Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2018-19) Parents have opportunities to participate as part of the Bonita Parents Club, Bonita School Site Council and as part of the District English Language Advisory Council. We encourage parents to attend school parent nights, back to school nights, parent teacher conferences and other activities and assemblies. We also keep our website updated so that parents can use as a resource and stay informed about academic and social events. All teachers at Bonita Elementary communicate with parents on a regular basis using Class Dojo. State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety. School Safety Plan Bonita Elementary has a Safe School Plan which was developed by a special committee comprised of administration, certificated staff, classified staff, and parents. The committee meets as necessary to review the appropriateness of the plan. The Safe School Plan is approved by the School Site Council and the School Board annually. 2017-18 School Accountability Report Card for Bonita Elementary School Page 7 of 9

Suspensions and Expulsions School 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Suspensions Rate 2.5 3.2 5.9 Expulsions Rate 0.0 0.0 0.0 District 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Suspensions Rate 3.8 6.1 5.4 Expulsions Rate 0.0 0.2 0.1 State 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Suspensions Rate 3.7 3.7 3.5 Expulsions Rate 0.1 0.1 0.1 D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff at this School Number of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Academic Counselor------- 0 Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development).25 Library Media Teacher (Librarian) 0 Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional).75 Psychologist-------.33 Social Worker------- 0 Nurse-------.15 Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist.25 Resource Specialist (non-teaching)-------.25 Other------- 0 Average Number of Students per Staff Member Academic Counselor------- 0 * One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) Number of Classrooms* Average Class Size Grade 1-20 21-32 33+ 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 K 28 19 18 1 1 1 1 23 24 21 1 1 1 2 26 14 30 1 1 1 3 24 29 17 1 1 1 4 24 23 33 1 1 1 5 22 21 26 1 1 1 * Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class). Professional Development provided for Teachers In the past 3 year period teachers have been provided an average of 25 days of professional development. The focus has been on preparing teachers for continued implementation of California's Math and English Language Arts Standards and also preparing staff for the transition to the Next Generation Science Standards. We have also focused on integration of technology as a resource in the classroom to teachers and students. Teachers were also given release time throughout the school year to align curriculum and instruction to the new standards, prepare lessons and collaborate with peers on best practices. We have also began a professional development plan for all teachers TK-12 on the transition to the Next Generation Science Standards. We will continue to provide professional development in coming years as we begin to implement the new science standards. 2017-18 School Accountability Report Card for Bonita Elementary School Page 8 of 9

FY 2016-17 Teacher and Administrative Salaries Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $49,119 $45,681 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $74,448 $70,601 Highest Teacher Salary $93,111 $89,337 Average Principal Salary (ES) $102,353 $110,053 Average Principal Salary (MS) $105,299 $115,224 Average Principal Salary (HS) $122,929 $124,876 Superintendent Salary $176,916 $182,466 Percent of District Budget Teacher Salaries 34.0 33.0 Administrative Salaries 5.0 6.0 * For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. FY 2016-17 Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries Level Expenditures Per Pupil Total Restricted Unrestricted Average Teacher Salary School Site- $8,316.70 $865.38 $7,451.32 $86,245.83 District------ $8,082.08 $74,927.31 State------- $7,125 $71,392 Percent Difference: School Site/District -8.1 14.0 Percent Difference: School Site/ State 4.5 18.8 * Cells with do not require data. The California Department of Education issued guidance to LEAs on August 1, 2018, regarding how to calculate school-level per-pupil expenditures that will be reported on 2018-19 report cards. Types of Services Funded Bonita provides students with general and special education services. We provide resource support to students with disabilities and also provide GATE Opportunities for students that excel. We provide an Afterschool Program and music program. DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest web page at https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners). Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. 2017-18 School Accountability Report Card for Bonita Elementary School Page 9 of 9