Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Similar documents
Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Shelters Elementary School

African American Male Achievement Update

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Cooper Upper Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

46 Children s Defense Fund

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Educational Attainment

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Best Colleges Main Survey

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Transportation Equity Analysis

University of Arizona

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

12-month Enrollment

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Financing Education In Minnesota

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Executive Summary. Hamilton High School

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

El Toro Elementary School

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Review of Student Assessment Data

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Executive Summary. Gautier High School

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School

Charter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

FTE General Instructions

World s Best Workforce Plan

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Kannapolis Charter Academy

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Bellevue University Admission Application

Cuero Independent School District

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

PEIMS Submission 1 list

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

A Diverse Student Body

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

Mooresville Charter Academy

Bellehaven Elementary

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

LIM College New York, NY

Organization Profile

State of New Jersey

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

Transcription:

2014-2015 Report Card for Woodridge Local School District DISTRICT GRADE Coming in 2018 Graduation data has been appealed by district and is subject to change. Contact district for more information. Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question How well did students do on the state test? Performance Index 77.8%...... Indicators Met 87.9%...... 2015 Modified Achievement Measure C B COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 Progress This is your district s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. Did the students get a year s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less? Value-Added Overall... Gifted... Students with Disabilities... Lowest 20% in Achievement... F F D C COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 Gap Closing This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, ethnicity, or disability? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 Graduation Rate This grade answers the question How many ninth graders graduate in four years or five years? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 Annual Measurable Objectives 37.0%...... 2015 AMO Download File F Graduation Rates 89.7% of students graduated in 4 years... 97.4% of students graduated in 5 years... B A K-3 Literacy This grade answers the question Are more students learning to read in kindergarten through third grade? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 Prepared for Success This grade answers the question Are students who graduate from your district ready for college or a career? There are many ways to show that graduates are prepared. COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 K-3 Literacy Improvement NC... NR... Page 1 of 27

Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question How well did students do on the state test? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 GRADE C Performance Index The Performance Index measures the test results of every student, not just those who score proficient or higher. There are six levels on the index and districts receive points for every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the more the points awarded in the district's index. This rewards schools and districts for improving performance. 120 Performance Index Trend Performance Index 20 0 40 60 80 100 77.8% 93.4 of a possible 120.0 A = 90.0-100.0% B = 80.0-89.9% C = 70.0-79.9% D = 50.0-69.9% F = 0.0-49.9% Achievement Level Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested 7.7 17.7 Pct of Students 0.3 11.5 34.4 x x x 1.3 1.2 1.1 = = = 28.4 x 1.0 = 17.7 x 0.6 = 7.7 x 0.3 = 0.0 x 0.0 = 28.4 0.3 11.5 Points for this Level 34.4 Points Received 0.4 13.8 37.8 28.4 10.6 2.3 0.0 93.4 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Limited Basic Untested 100 80 60 40 20 0 100.8 101.5 101.0 102.0 93.4 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Limited Basic Proficient Accelerated Advanced Advanced Plus Page 2 of 27

GRADE B Indicators Met Indicators Met measures the percent of students who have passed state tests. Test results are reported for each student in a grade and subject. At least 80 percent of students must pass to get credit for the indicator. Indicators Met % 87.9% 29 out of 33 40 60 A = B = C = D = F = 90.0-100.0% 80.0-89.9% 70.0-79.9% 50.0-69.9% 0.0-49.9% 20 0 80 100 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Ohio Graduation Test Mathematics 49.7% Mathematics 78.5% Mathematics 84.9% 3rd Grade 80.7% 6th Grade 71.5% 89.8% Mathematics 64.3% Social Studies 57.9% OGT, 10th Graders Science 83.1% 4th Grade 70.7% Mathematics 82.5% Social Studies 90.4% 7th Grade Social Studies 71.7% 73.4% Writing 91.6% Mathematics 80.3% Mathematics 80.3% Mathematics 94.1% 5th Grade 70.5% 8th Grade 80.2% 94.9% Science 73.3% Science 76.5% OGT, 11th Graders Science 91.2% Social Studies 92.6% Writing 94.1% Page 3 of 27

Achievement Levels by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade 3rd Grade 3rd Grade 90% 85% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 45% 80.7% 86.2% 78.5% 73.6% 66.3% 49.7% Mathematics 100% 90% 70% 60% 50% 40% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 District Similar Districts State Average Mathematics 4th Grade 4th Grade 84% 76% 72% 68% 64% 82.6% 81.4% 75.5% 71.9% 71.7% 72.0% 70.7% 64.3% 65.1% Mathematics Social Studies 100% 95% 90% 85% 75% 70% 65% 60% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 District Similar Districts State Average Mathematics Social Studies 5th Grade 5th Grade 84% 76% 72% 68% 64% 60% 80.3% 78.4% 76.3% 73.3% 70.5% 69.5% 70.9% 65.7% 60.3% Mathematics Science 100% 95% 90% 85% 75% 70% 65% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 District Similar Districts State Average Mathematics Science Page 4 of 27

6th Grade 6th Grade 76% 72% 68% 64% 60% 56% 78.1% 78.5% 74.9% 71.5% 70.3% 68.8% 65.4% 57.9% 57.5% Mathematics Social Studies 100% 95% 90% 85% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 District Similar Districts State Average Mathematics Social Studies 7th Grade 7th Grade 84% 76% 72% 68% 64% 73.4% 77.2% 68.6% 82.5% 73.0% 65.3% Mathematics 100% 96% 92% 88% 84% 76% 72% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 District Similar Districts State Average Mathematics 8th Grade 8th Grade 84% 80.2% 79.5% 80.3% 76.5% 76% 75.7% 72% 68.3% 68% 67.1% 64% 62.3% 60% 56% 53.7% 52% Mathematics Science District Similar Districts State Average 100% 96% 92% 88% 84% 76% 72% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Mathematics Science Page 5 of 27

10th Grade OGT 96% 91.6% 92.1% 89.5% 92% 91.6% 89.8% 90.4% 89.2% 88% 86.4% 84.9% 84.9% 84.9% 84% 82.2% 83.1% 81.5% 76% 74.8% 72% Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science District Similar Districts State Average 100% 96% 92% 88% 84% 76% 10th Grade OGT 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science 11th Grade Cumulative OGT 98% 96.6% 96.7% 96% 94.9% 94.9% 94.9% 94.1% 94.1% 94% 92.6% 93.0% 92.2% 92% 91.7% 91.2% 90% 88.7% 88.4% 88% 86% 84.7% 84% Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science District Similar Districts State Average 100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 11th Grade Cumulative OGT 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science Page 6 of 27

Gifted Students The Gifted Students data and Indicator highlight the opportunities for and performance of gifted students. The dashboard answers several questions: How many students are identified as gifted and in what categories? How many of those students are receiving gifted services? How well are those gifted students performing? The Gifted Indicator measures whether opportunity and performance expectations are being met for gifted students. INDICATOR Not Met The Gifted Indicator is derived from three components: Gifted Value Added grade, the Performance Index for gifted students, and a Gifted Inputs score. Value Added Grade: Enrollment: Value Added Met? Performance Index: Performance Index Met?: Not Met Total Points: Gifted Inputs Met?: INDICATOR Not Met F 1,958 Not Met Gifted Value Added Districts must earn a Gifted Value Added grade of C or better to meet the Gifted Value Added component. A grade of "NR" results in Not Met if the district has an ADM of 600 or more. Gifted Performance Index 109.8 36.0 Not Met Overview Districts with at least 10 unique students in the Gifted Performance Index calculation must score 115.0 or better to meet the Gifted Performance Index component. Gifted Inputs Points are earned based on identification and services provided to gifted students. Districts must earn at least 40 points out of a possible 100 to meet the Gifted Inputs component. Gifted Indicator Final Result The Gifted Indicator is Met if none of the three components are Not Met. Gifted Inputs alone cannot determine the Gifted Indicator, however; if both the Value Added and Performance Index components are NC, then the Gifted Indicator is also NC. 20 0 40 60 80 100 91.5% 109.8 of a possible 120.0 A = 90.0-100.0% B = 80.0-89.9% C = 70.0-79.9% D =50.0-69.9% F = 0.0-49.9% Performance Index The Performance Index calculation for gifted students. Only tests taken by students identified as gifted in that subject (e.g. gifted in Math and taking the Math test), or taken by students identified with Super Cognitive abilities regardless of test subject are included. Achievement Level Pct of Students Points for this Level Points Received Advanced Plus 1.4 x 1.3 = 1.8 Advanced 27.6 x 1.2 = 33.1 Accelerated 57.1 x 1.1 = 62.8 Proficient 10.4 x 1.0 = 10.4 Basic 2.1 x 0.6 = 1.3 Limited 1.4 x 0.3 = 0.4 Untested 0.0 x 0.0 = 0.0 109.8 2.1 1.4 1.4 10.4 57.1 27.6 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Limited Basic Untested Page 7 of 27

Gifted Indicator The Gifted Inputs calculation assigns points based on the percentage of students identified and served in eight categories (factors). The points earned for each category are totaled to determine the final Met/Not Met determination for the Gifted Input component., Math, Science, Social Studies, and Superior Cognitive Abilities K-3 4-8 9-12 10.9% 4.5% 28.8% 15.5% 95.7% 4.3% 73.5% 66.7% Visual/Performing Arts and Creative Thinking K-3 4-8 9-12 100.0% 99.0% 1.0% 94.9% 5.1% Disadvantaged Students Minority Students 92.8% 5.9% 1.3% 93.1% 5.9% 1.0% Receiving Gifted Services Identified as Gifted, but not receiving services Not Identified as Gifted Page 8 of 27

Identification and Services These charts show the percentage of enrolled students that are identified as gifted and that are receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 1.8% 0.0% Creative Thinking 13.3% Math 12.7% 9.0% Science 10.0% 9.9% 5.7% 0.3% Social Studies Visual and Performing Arts Superior Cognitive 2.4% 2.0% 1.6% 1.2% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 2.3% 1.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.5% Math Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Identified Receiving Services Identified Grades 4-8 Grades 9-12 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.8% Creative Thinking 16.8% Math 15.1% 10.1% Science 10.7% Social Studies 12.2% 10.9% Visual 0.1% and Performing Arts Superior Cognitive 24.0% 20.0% 16.0% 12.0% 8.0% 4.0% 4.5% 0.0% Creative Thinking 19.7% Math 20.6% 15.1% Science 17.5% Social Studies 13.9% 4.5% 0.8% Visual and Performing Arts Superior Cognitive Identified Receiving Services Identified Receiving Services Page 9 of 27

Identified and Receiving Services These charts show, of the students identified as gifted, the percentage of students receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 60.0% 50.0% 58.0% 600.0% 400.0% 40.0% 30.0% 200.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% -200.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -400.0% Creative Thinking Math Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Visual and Performing Arts -600.0% Math Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Grades 4-8 Grades 9-12 100.0% 35.0% 80.0% 89.4% 30.0% 25.0% 32.4% 60.0% 20.0% 40.0% 15.0% 20.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Creative Thinking Math Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Visual and Performing Arts 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Creative Thinking Math Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Visual and Performing Arts 0.0% Page 10 of 27

Screening Acceleration This chart shows the percentage of students screened for gifted abilities this school year. 16% 14% 12% 14.2% 14.2% 14.2% 14.2% 14.2% Number of Subject Accelerated Students: < 10 10% 8% 6% 4% Number of Whole-Grade Accelerated Students: < 10 2% 0% Math Social Studies Science Superior Cognitive Page 11 of 27

Progress This is your district s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. It answers the question Did the students get a year s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 GRADE F GRADE F GRADE C GRADE D GRADE Coming in 2018 GRADE NR Overall This measures the progress for all students in math and reading, grades 4-8. Gifted Students This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading, math, and/or superior cognitive ability. Students in the Lowest 20% in Achievement This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 20% statewide in reading and math achievement. Students with Disabilities This measures the progress for students with disabilities. High School A High School measure of progress will be reported in the 2014-15 school year. High Mobility For districts and schools with a mobility rate of 25% or higher, this measures the progress of a subset of students that have been in the district for at least two years. This measure will not be included in the Progress component grade. Test Grade All Grades 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade High School Progress Details This table shows the Progress scores by test grade and subject, and includes up to three years of data as available. Progress Score English Language Arts Mathematics All Tests Although Progress scores are not assigned letter grades at this level of detail, the grading scale applied at the Overall (All Students, All Tests) level is: -9.05 2.12-5.12-6.35-1.53-5.24-3.08-0.06-2.19-5.84-1.59-5.02-1.02 4.46 2.02-3.85 4.12-0.66-10.09 0.78-7.10 A = 2.00 and up B = 1.00 to 1.99 C = -1.00 to 0.99 D = -2.00 to -1.01 F = below -2.00 Page 12 of 27

Progress vs. Performance Index This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's Performance Index results (horizontal axis) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical axis). The size of the bubble represents the size of the student subgroup. A B Grade C Overall Students w/ Disabilities Lowest 20% Gifted D F 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Performance Index Page 13 of 27

Gap Closing This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, ethnicity, or disability? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 GRADE F Annual Measurable Objectives Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of student groups to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achieves that goal in reading, math and graduation and emphasize any achievement gaps that exist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels. Math Graduation Rate AMO Points 85.9 83.8 20 0 40 60 80 100 76.9 70.6 74.3 63.9 97.0 62.7 59.6 37 37.0% A = 90.0-100.0% B = 80.0-89.9% C = 70.0-79.9% D = 60.0-69.9% F = 0.0-59.9% 62.2 57.3 52.7 45.9 33.3 57.6 56.8 51.4 50.8 29.0 89.7 71.1 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 White Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander African American Students w/ Disabilities All Students Multiracial Econ Disadvantage Limited English White Asian/Pacific Islander Hispanic Limited English Students w/ Disabilities All Students Multiracial Econ Disadvantage African American 0 20 40 60 80 100 White All Students Econ Disadvantage The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 2015 AMO for is 71.3%, for Math is 65.0%, and for Graduation Rate is 80.5%. Subgroups with fewer than 30 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs. Page 14 of 27

Graduation Rate This grade represents the percentage of students whom entered the 9th grade and graduated 4 and 5 years later. COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 4-Year Graduation Rate The 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2014 who graduated within four years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 2011 and graduated by 2014. 4-Year Rate 5-Year Rate GRADE B 89.7% A = 93.0-100.0% B = 89.0-92.9% C = 84.0-88.9% D = 79.0-83.9% F = 0.0-78.9% 20 0 40 60 80 100 100 80 60 89.7 92.8 82.2 100 80 60 97.4 95.0 84.5 5-Year Graduation Rate The 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2013 who graduated within five years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 2010 and graduated by 2014. GRADE A 97.4% A = 95.0-100.0% B = 90.0-94.9% C = 85.0-89.9% D = 80.0-84.9% F = 0.0-79.9% 20 0 40 60 80 100 40 20 0 District State Average Similar Districts 40 20 0 District State Average Similar Districts Page 15 of 27

Graduation Rate Trend 98% 97.4% 97.4% 96% 95.8% 96.1% 95.5% 94% 93.8% 92% 91.1% 90% 89.7% 88.4% 88% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 4-Year 5-Year Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because the necessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year. Page 16 of 27

K-3 Literacy This grade answers the question - Are more students learning to read in kindergarten through third grade? COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 GRADE NR K-3 Literacy Improvement This district has not been graded because less than 5% of kindergarten 40 60 students 20 are not 80 on track this year. 0 100 62.9% 95 out of 151 A = 82.6-100.0% B = 64.9-82.5% C = 47.2-64.8% D = 29.5-47.1% F = 0.0-29.4% 42 83.3% 51 52.9% 30 In Your District... kindergarten students were not on-track last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 1st grade. This 28 district first grade has students not been were not graded on-track last year. because less than 5% of kindergarten of those students improved to ontrack in not 2nd on-track grade. this students 60.7% are year. second grade students were not ontrack last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 3rd grade. third grade students were not on-track this year. of those students reached proficiency 53.3% on the 3rd grade OAA. Not On-Track at Point A Kindergarten Diagnostic, School Year 2013-2014 1st Grade Diagnostic, School Year 2013-2014 2nd Grade Diagnostic, School Year 2013-2014 3rd Grade Diagnostic, School Year 2014-2015 Details of Measure 42 to 28 to 51 to 30 to Improving to On-Track at Point B 1st Grade Diagnostic, School Year 2014-2015 2nd Grade Diagnostic, School Year 2014-2015 3rd Grade Diagnostic, School Year 2014-2015 3rd Grade OAA, School Year 2014-2015 Deduction for 3rd graders who did not pass OAA and were not on a Improvement and Monitoring Plan 35 17 27 16 No Deduction Totals NC NC Page 17 of 27

Percentage On-Track in Diagnostic Third Grade Guarantee Kindergarten Diagnostic First Grade Diagnostic Second Grade Diagnostic 96.2% 90.8% 78.0% 3.8% 9.2% 22.0% On- Track Not On-Track Ohio's Third Grade Guarantee ensures that students are successful in reading before moving on to fourth grade. Schools must provide supports for struggling readers in early grades. If a child appears to be falling behind in reading, the school will immediately start a Improvement and Monitoring Plan. The program ensures that every struggling reader gets the support he or she needs to learn and achieve. Students have multiple opportunities to meet promotion requirements including meeting a minimum promotion score on the third grade state reading tests given in the fall and spring. Students have an additional opportunity to take the state assessment in the summer, as well as a district-determined alternative assessment. Third Grade Diagnostic 77.4% 22.6% The Parent Roadmap is available to help parents understand how the Third Grade How many third Guarantee graders applies met the to Third your Grade child. 99.2% Coming Guarantee requirements for promotion to 4th grade? Soon 0% 20% 40% 60% 100% This chart shows the overall percentage of students that were on-track/not-on-track for each grade level reading diagnostic in 2014-2015. How many third graders scored proficient on the state test? 80.7% Coming Soon Page 18 of 27

Prepared for Success This grade answers the question Are students who graduate from your district ready for college or a career? There are many ways to show that graduates are prepared. COMPONENT GRADE Coming in 2016 How Prepared was Your 2014 Graduating Class? Outcomes after High School Graduation ACT: Participation ACT: Remediation Free SAT: Participation 6.6% 33.8% 76.5% Districts and schools have long-term impacts on student outcomes. The Prepared for Success component provides information on how schools prepare students for different pathways of college and career success. It also provides insights on how those students do once they leave high school. What happens beyond the diploma is an important indicator of how well schools are preparing students. SAT: Remediation Free Honors Diploma Industry-Recognized Credential 3.7% 0.0% 22.1% The University System of Ohio provides district reports on enrollment and remediation of high school graduates attending in-state, public colleges and universities. Additional data on outcomes after high school are coming soon. These will include college graduation, demographics of college enrollees, workforce and military enlistment. Advanced Placement: Participation 19.1% AP: Exam Score of 3 or Better 21.3% Dual Enrollment Credit 1.5% International Baccalaureate IB: Exam Score of 4 or Better 0.0% 0.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 100% Note: These data represent students in the 4-year graduation rate, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2011. Page 19 of 27

Superintendent: Walter C. Davis Address: 4411 Quick Rd Peninsula OH 44264-9706 Directory information current as of the 2014-2015 Report Card publication date Phone: (330) 928-9074 County: Career Tech Planning District: Summit Six District Voc Ed Compact CTPD Your District's Students Average Daily Enrollment: 2,001 Number of Limited English Proficiency Students Excluded from Accountability Calculations: -- Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficiency Migrant Enrollment by Subgroup Enrollment # Enrollment % NC 96 414 66 139 1,284 244 773 89 1 4.8% 20.7% 3.3% 6.9% 64.2% 12.2% 38.6% 4.5% NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group State and federal law require an annual assessment of Limited English Proficient (LEP) students to measure their English language proficiency. The Ohio Test of English Language Acquisition (OTELA) is the assessment used in Ohio to gauge LEP students' growth in learning English. For information about your district's OTELA results, see the Department of Education's web site at http://education.ohio.gov. 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 4.8% American Indian or Alaska... 20.7% 6.9% 3.3% 64.2% 12.2% Asian or Pacific Islander 38.6% 4.5% Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Migrant Economic Disadvantage Limited English Proficiency Enrollments of less than 10 students are not shown. Page 20 of 27

Attendance Chronic Absenteeism Rate: 8.9% Attendance Rate All Students 95.3% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native NC Asian or Pacific Islander 94.3% Black, Non-Hispanic 94.5% Hispanic 94.0% Multiracial 94.0% White, Non-Hispanic 95.9% Students with Disabilities 93.7% Economic Disadvantage 93.8% Limited English Proficiency 93.6% Migrant NC Male 95.5% Female 95.2% NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group 100% 60% 40% 20% 0% 95.3% 94.3%94.5%94.0%94.0% 95.9% 93.7%93.8%93.6% All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Students with Disabilities Asian or Pacific Islander Economic Disadvantage Attendance Rate is not shown if enrollment is less than 10. Page 21 of 27

Mobility Rates by Subgroup District Mobility % All Students 11.0% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native NC Asian or Pacific Islander 17.4% Black, Non-Hispanic 17.7% Hispanic 7.4% Multiracial 16.7% White, Non-Hispanic 8.0% Students with Disabilities 17.7% Economically Disadvantaged 14.0% Limited English Proficiency 18.6% Migrant NC 20% 16% 12% 8% 4% 0% 11.0% 17.7% 17.4% 7.4% 16.7% 8.0% 17.7% 14.0% 18.6% NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Students with Disabilities Migrant Asian or Pacific Islander Economic Disadvantage This chart shows the percentage of students who, because they moved into or out of the district, did not spend a majority of the school year within the district. Page 22 of 27

Wellness and Physical Education The extent to which students are successful in meeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's physical education standards Compliance with the federal requirement for implementing a local wellness policy Elected to administer BMI screening Participation in Physical Activity Pilot Program Moderate Success School Choice Options: Place of Enrollment for Students Residing in the District The School Choice Options data is a set of nine counts describing the place of enrollment for students residing in the school district, captured as a snapshot of a single day in the school year. Web links provide further information about certain options. Districts and STEM Schools Community Schools Non-Public Schools* choice options coming soon 0 students enrolled in the district 0 students enrolled in an online where they lived community school 0 students enrolled in another public district through Open Enrollment 0 students enrolled in another public district by means other than Open Enrollment 0 students enrolled in a sitebased community school 0 students enrolled in a Dropout Prevention and Recovery Program (online or site-based) 0 students participated in the EdChoice Scholarship or Cleveland Scholarship Program 0 students participated in the EdChoice Expansion Program 0 students participated in the Ohio Autism Scholarship or Jon Peterson Special Needs Scholarship Program Fine Arts Courses Offered No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. No Fine Arts Courses are offered by this district. *ODE does not collect and cannot report information on district residents who are nonvoucher students attending a non-public school. Page 23 of 27

Financial Data These measures answer several questions about spending and performance. How much is spent on Classroom instruction? How much, on average, is spent on each student? What is the source of the revenue? How do these measures compare to other districts and schools? Comparison Group: Enrollment between 1000 and 2499 Classroom Spending Data Spending per Pupil Data District State What percent of funds are spent on classroom instruction? 68.8% How does this district rank in comparison to other districts of similar size? 70 out of 276 A rank of 1 indicates the highest percent spent on classroom instruction. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Operating Spending per Pupil $10,114 $9,228 Classroom Instruction $6,960 $6,211 Non-Classroom Spending $3,154 $3,016 District District Comparison Group State 31.2% 33.3% 32.7% State 68.8% 66.7% 67.3% $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 Classroom Instruction Non-Classroom Instruction Woodridge Local IS NOT among the 20% of public districts with the lowest operating expenditures per pupil Woodridge Local IS NOT among the 20% of public districts with the highest academic performance index scores. Note: District financial data do not include data associated with community schools that are sponsored by the school district. Page 24 of 27

Spending and Performance This measure answers the question what is the relationship of average spending per student to performance, and how does that compare to similar districts and schools? Similar Districts Comparison Group All Districts 120.0 120.0 120.0 110.0 110.0 110.0 Performance Index 100.0 90.0 Performance Index 100.0 90.0 Performance Index 100.0 90.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 60.0 $0 $4,000 $8,000 $12,000 $16,000 $20,000 $24,000 $28,000 $32,000 60.0 $0 $4,000 $8,000 $12,000 $16,000 $20,000 $24,000 $28,000 $32,000 60.0 $0 $4,000 $8,000 $12,000 $16,000 $20,000 $24,000 $28,000 $32,000 Spending per Pupil Spending per Pupil Spending per Pupil Page 25 of 27

Source of Revenue Source of Funds District State Total Local State Federal Other Non-Tax Total $17,232,737 64.8% $5,423,144 20.4% $1,540,127 5.8% $2,412,392 9.1% $26,608,400 100.0% $8,465,909,321 39.4% $9,920,347,064 46.1% $1,617,676,379 7.5% $1,492,334,587 6.9% $21,496,267,351 100.0% District State 46% 20% 6% 9% 7% 65% 8% 39% Local Federal State Other Non-Tax Local State Federal Other Non-Tax Page 26 of 27

Superintendent: Address: Walter C. Davis 4411 Quick Rd Peninsula OH 44264-9706 Phone: County: (330) 928-9074 Summit School Achievement Performance Index Indicators Met Your District's Schools Overall Gifted Progress Lowest 20% Achieve Students with Disabilitie s Gap Closing Annual Measurable Objectives Graduation Rate 4-Year Graduation Rate 5-Year Graduation Rate K-3 Literacy Woodridge High School B C NR NR NR NR D B A NR Woodridge Intermediate Elementary School C C F F D F F NR NR C Woodridge Middle School C A F F C C F NR NR NR Woodridge Primary Elementary School NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR K-3 Literacy Page 27 of 27