California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Engage Educate Empower

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Val Verde Unified School District

Hokulani Elementary School

Shelters Elementary School

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Kahului Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Val Verde Unified School District

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

World s Best Workforce Plan

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Clark Lane Middle School

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

State Parental Involvement Plan

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

Geographic Area - Englewood

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

School Action Plan: Template Overview

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

12-month Enrollment

State Budget Update February 2016

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Educational Attainment

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

CDS Code

2016 Annual Report to the School Community

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

The Single Plan for Student Achievement

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Cuero Independent School District

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Transcription:

KIPP Raices Academy California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2016-17 School Year By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners). Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. Yesenia Castro, Principal Principal, KIPP Raices Academy About Our School About Our School The mission of KIPP Raíces Academy is to teach the knowledge and skills, nurture the confidence and character, and inspire the passion needed for students to achieve their goals, excel in the competitive world, and positively impact the community through excellence in thought and action. KIPP Raíces Academy is a free, open enrollment, collegepreparatory public school in East Los Angeles, which opened in August 2008 with 100 Kindergarten students. Our school has grown one grade level per year and now serves 553 transitional kindergarten through 4th grade students. 85.6% of our student population qualifies for free or reduced lunch, 99% are Latino, and 0.2% is African-American. KIPP Raíces Academy is a part of KIPP, the Knowledge Is Power Program, a national network of college-preparatory public schools in under-resourced communities throughout the United States with a proven track record of success. Our school is driven by the core operating principles of the five pillars that all KIPP schools share as follows: high expectations, choice and commitment, power to lead, more time, and focus on results. Further, our school culture is driven by our four values of love, honor, integrity, and excellence, and our school rules of be safe, work hard, and be nice. KIPP Raíces Academy offers a rigorous instructional program that builds the needed foundation to ensure our students success in the future. The program nurtures well-rounded critical thinkers who love learning, while preparing them to master the California and Common Core standards through engaging in authentic work. KIPP Raíces Academy fosters the positive development of the whole child. Art, creative play, balanced literacy, physical education, character development, and good nutrition are all critical components of a KIPP Raíces education. Beyond the focus of our students performing at or above grade level in reading and mathematics, our students are artists, scientists, musicians, authors, athletes, and agents of change who develop projects to impact the community. Our students are independent learners who are invested in driving their own learning to meet their goals. In 2014, KIPP Raíces Academy was recognized as a California Distinguished School and in 2015 was recognized as a National Blue Ribbon School. Contact KIPP Raices Academy 668 Atlantic Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90022-1118 Phone: 323-780-3900 E-mail: ycastro@kippla.org

Page 2 of 19

About This School Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) District Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) School Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) District Name Los Angeles Unified School Name KIPP Raices Academy Phone Number (213) 241-1000 Street 668 Atlantic Blvd. Superintendent Michelle King City, State, Zip Los Angeles, Ca, 90022-1118 E-mail Address michelle.king@lausd.net Phone Number 323-780-3900 Web Site www.lausd.net Principal Yesenia Castro, Principal E-mail Address ycastro@kippla.org Web Site http://kippla.org/raices/about.cfm County-District-School (CDS) Code 19647330117903 School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2017-18) School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2017-18) The mission of KIPP Raíces Academy is to teach the knowledge and skills, nurture the confidence and character, and inspire the passion needed for students to achieve their goals, excel in the competitive world, and positively impact the community through excellence in thought and action. Page 3 of 19

Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2016-17) Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2016-17) Grade Level Number of Students Kindergarten 114 Grade 1 116 Grade 2 113 Grade 3 106 Grade 4 105 Total Enrollment 554 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2016-17) Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American 0.0 % American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0 % Asian 0.2 % Filipino 0.2 % Hispanic or Latino 98.9 % Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.0 % White 0.5 % Two or More Races 0.0 % Other 0.2 % Student Group (Other) Percent of Total Enrollment Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 88.3 % English Learners 37.5 % Students with Disabilities 9.2 % Foster Youth 0.2 % Page 4 of 19

A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair Teacher Credentials Teacher Credentials Teachers School District 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2017-18 With Full Credential 36 35 34 21842 Without Full Credential 2 3 3 866 40 35 30 Teachers with Full Credential Teachers without Full Credential Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0 0 0 2830 25 20 15 10 5 0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Last updated: 2/8/2018 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Indicator Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 0 0 0 1.0 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments Vacant Teacher Positions Total Teacher Misassignments* 0 0 0 0.5 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 0 0.0-0.5-1.0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Page 5 of 19

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2017-18) Year and month in which the data were collected: January 2018 Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/year of Adoption From Most Recent Adoption? Percent Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy Reading/Language Arts Words Their Way, Wordly Wise, Open Court, Accelerated Reader, Lexia Learning, Learning A-Z, Bridges 0.0 % Mathematics Envision, ST Math 0.0 % Science Amplify, Houghton Mifflin Science Fusion 0.0 % History-Social Science Pearson California History/Social Studies 0.0 % Foreign Language National Geographic/Cenage Learning - Canciones y Cuentos 0.0 % Health 0.0 % Visual and Performing Arts Science Lab Eqpmt (Grades 9-12) Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. 0.0 % N/A N/A 0.0 % Page 6 of 19

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements The KIPP Raíces Academy campus is inspected monthly for safety and cleanliness. At this time we are not planning any facility improvements as we recently completed a few winter break (December 2017) maintenance repairs that included facilities/furniture deep clean, floor stripping and waxing, carpet cleaning, as well as playground pressure washing. The last major facilities project was in August of 2013 when the office was moved into an adjacent building allowing for more space in the main building for classes and creating a quiet and welcoming office environment. School Facility Good Repair Status Year and month of the most recent FIT report: System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/Doors/Gates/Fences Rating Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned Overall Facility Rate Year and month of the most recent FIT report: Overall Rating Good Page 7 of 19

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for students in the general education population and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] and mathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. Only eligible students may participate in the administration of the CAAs. CAAs items are aligned with alternate achievement standards, which are linked with the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities); and The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. CAASPP Test Results in ELA and Mathematics for All Students CAASPP Test Results in ELA and Mathematics for All Students Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards School District State Subject 2015-16 2016-17 2015-16 2016-17 2015-16 2016-17 English Language Arts / Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) 86% 81% 39% 40% 48% 48% Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11) 85% 83% 29% 30% 36% 37% Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Page 8 of 19

CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 210 210 100.00% 80.95% Male 107 107 100.00% 77.57% Female 103 103 100.00% 84.47% Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino 208 208 100.00% 80.77% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White -- -- -- Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 187 187 100.00% 80.75% English Learners 121 121 100.00% 80.17% Students with Disabilities 23 23 100.00% 34.78% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 9 of 19

CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 210 210 100.00% 83.33% Male 107 107 100.00% 84.11% Female 103 103 100.00% 82.52% Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino 208 208 100.00% 83.17% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White -- -- -- Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 187 187 100.00% 82.89% English Learners 121 121 100.00% 85.95% Students with Disabilities 23 23 100.00% 47.83% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 10 of 19

CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students Grades Five, Eight and Ten Grades Five, Eight and Ten Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced School District State Subject 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 56% 54% Note: Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) in grades five, eight, and ten. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note:The 2016-17 data are not available. The California Department of Education is developing a new science assessment based on the Next Generation Science Standards for California Public Schools (CA NGSS). The new California Science Test (CAST) was piloted in spring 2017. The CST and CMA for Science will no longer be administered. Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2016-17) Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2016-17) Measure CTE Program Participation Number of Pupils Participating in CTE Percent of Pupils Completing a CTE Program and Earning a High School Diploma -- Percent of CTE Courses Sequenced or Articulated Between the School and Institutions of Postsecondary Education -- Courses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) Admission Courses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) Admission UC/CSU Course Measure Percent 2016-17 Pupils Enrolled in Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 0.0% 2015-16 Graduates Who Completed All Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 0.0% Page 11 of 19

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8): Pupil outcomes in the subject area of physical education California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2016-17) California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2016-17) Percentage of Students Meeting Fitness Standards Grade Level Four of Six Fitness Standards Five of Six Fitness Standards Six of Six Fitness Standards Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Page 12 of 19

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2017-18) Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2017-18) KIPP Raíces Academy highly values parental involvement in school activities. Many times throughout the year we offer opportunities for parents to join in the planning and execution of school activities such as the Winter Concert, fundraising events, October Extravaganza, La Feria, and more. They often have the opportunity to take the lead with these projects and help plan the events from the ground up. Parents can also volunteer in their child's classroom, office, during morning drop-off, and many other times throughout the day. Parent volunteer opportunities are announced through our weekly family newsletter and through notices sent home to families. Lastly, parents get to engage with Administrators during quarterly "Coffee with Admin" events. Page 13 of 19

State Priority: Pupil Engagement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Engagement (Priority 5): High school dropout rates; and High school graduation rates Page 14 of 19

State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety Suspensions and Expulsions Suspensions and Expulsions School District State Rate 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Suspensions -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.8% 3.7% 3.7% Expulsions -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% Suspensions Expulsions 4.0 3.5 School Suspensions District Suspensions State Suspensions 0.12 0.10 School Expulsions District Expulsions State Expulsions 3.0 2.5 0.08 2.0 0.06 1.5 0.04 1.0 0.5 0.02 0.0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 0.00 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 School Safety Plan (School Year 2017-18) KIPP Raíces Academy is committed to the safety of our children and staff. Each year the safety plan is reviewed and updated with any new policies or procedures needed to keep our school safe. Fire, earthquake, and lockdown drills are practiced monthly on a rotating basis. The key elements of our plan are our incident command chart, fire, earthquake, and lockdown procedures. Page 15 of 19

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2017-18) Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2017-18) Indicator School District Program Improvement Status Not in PI In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2004-2005 Year in Program Improvement Year 3 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 642 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 69.0% Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Grade Level Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ K 20.0 2 14 0 23.0 0 20 0 23.0 0 25 0 1 22.0 0 15 0 19.0 5 25 0 23.0 0 30 0 2 21.0 3 12 0 22.0 0 25 0 22.0 2 34 0 3 25.0 0 12 0 27.0 0 20 0 27.0 0 24 0 4 26.0 0 12 0 25.0 0 20 0 26.0 0 24 0 5 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 6 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 Other 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 * Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class). Page 16 of 19

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Subject English Mathematics Science Social Science Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ * Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level. Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2016-17) Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor Academic Counselor Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) Library Media Teacher (Librarian) Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) N/A N/A N/A Psychologist 0.4 N/A Social Worker 0.6 N/A Nurse 0.2 N/A Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 1.3 N/A Resource Specialist (non-teaching) 3.0 N/A Other 0.7 N/A Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. *One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Level Total Expenditures Per Pupil Expenditures Per Pupil (Restricted) Expenditures Per Pupil (Unrestricted) Average Teacher Salary School Site $11850.0 $2633.0 $9216.0 $58919.0 District N/A N/A $7038.0 $73658.0 Percent Difference School Site and District N/A N/A -33.4% -22.2% State N/A N/A $6574.0 $79228.0 Percent Difference School Site and State N/A N/A 33.5% -29.4% Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Last updated: 2/8/2018 Page 17 of 19

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2016-17) Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2016-17) As a student at KIPP: Raíces Academy, Achievers will explore Spanish, Physical Education, Art, and Music. Through the inclusion of these subjects in a regular school day, students build the foundational knowledge of each content area and identify specific areas that spark their individual passions. Special subjects allow creativity and curiosity to develop in a variety of ways, innately embracing the learning styles of each student. Through these subjects, students experience teamwork, problem-solving, and risk-taking in new and unique environments. At KRA, we believe educating the whole child will teach our achievers the knowledge and skills needed to excel in a competitive world. Through collaboration, cross-curricular connections, and passion for our content areas, we provide a holistic avenue to inspire new passions in our students. Each member brings their own knowledge and expertise to our team, which combine to create a perfect whole. Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $43,913 $47,808 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $70,141 $73,555 Highest Teacher Salary $87,085 $95,850 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $116,684 $120,448 Average Principal Salary (Middle) $131,969 $125,592 Average Principal Salary (High) $133,725 $138,175 Superintendent Salary $350,000 $264,457 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 32.0% 35.0% Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5.0% 5.0% For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Teacher Salary Chart Principal Salary Chart 100000 150000 80000 125000 100000 60000 75000 40000 50000 20000 25000 0 Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary 0 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) Average Principal Salary (Middle) Average Principal Salary (High) Professional Development Each week 2-3 hours are scheduled for teacher professional development. The professional development schedule is set over the summer for the first half of the Page 18 of 19

school year and a tentative schedule is set for the second half of the year. The areas of focus are determined based on a combination of logistical/administrative concerns and curricular needs. Priorities for professional development are based on teacher reflections from the end of the previous year. Professional development focuses are spread out throughout the year and are revisited multiple times. Most of the professional development trainings are delivered during after-school workshops. Some are also provided through conference attendance and individual mentoring. Teachers are supported through inclass observations, teacher-administrator meetings, and student performance data reporting. Page 19 of 19