Sacramento Valley Charter

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

John F. Kennedy Middle School

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Engage Educate Empower

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Shelters Elementary School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Val Verde Unified School District

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Hokulani Elementary School

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Kahului Elementary School

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

3/6/2009. Residence Halls & Strategic t Planning Overview. Residence Halls Overview. Residence Halls: Marapai Supai Kachina

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Val Verde Unified School District

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Wright Middle School. School Supplement to the District Policy Guide

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Educational Attainment

12-month Enrollment

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

University of Arizona

Transportation Equity Analysis

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Organization Profile

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Best Colleges Main Survey

Geographic Area - Englewood

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Carnegie Mellon University Student Government Graffiti and Poster Policy

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

State of New Jersey

Data Diskette & CD ROM

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

DLM NYSED Enrollment File Layout for NYSAA

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Raw Data Files Instructions

Long Beach Unified School District

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

STANISLAUS COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY CASE #08-04 LA GRANGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Cuero Independent School District

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:


School Performance Plan Middle Schools

African American Male Achievement Update

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Lied Scottsbluff Public Library Strategic Plan

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Transcription:

Sacramento Valley Charter California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2014-15 School Year Published During 2015-16 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians, and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners. Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. Sheila Gibson, Principal Principal, Sacramento Valley Charter About Our School About Our School Sacramento Valley Charter School (SVCS) is a charter school approved by Washington Unified School District. We opened our doors in 2011 with fifty students in grades K-3. Our student population has grown to serve two hundred and thirty five student serving grades K-8. We serves students from West Sacramento, Elk Grove, Natomas and Antelope communities. Our school offers transportation to students from surrounding districts that wish to attend SVCS. Our school environment fosters high expectations of each student and supports excellence for all students. All students have access to a common core standards curriculum and the world language of Punjabi. On behalf of the Board of Directors we invite parents and guardians to help us by encouraging their child to do their very best to learn, excel and compete. We invite you to visit our school to attend parent meetings and to be involved in your student s education. Open communication between home and school are essential partnerships to ensure positive and successful educational experiences for your child. We encourage our families to become involved in school activities to promote responsible students prepared to meet the challenges of the 21st century. Contact Sacramento Valley Charter 2399 Sellers Way West Sacramento, CA 95691-3046 Phone: 916-596-6422 E-mail: sgibson.svcs@gmail.com

About This School Contact Information - Most Recent Year Contact Information - Most Recent Year District Contact Information - Most Recent Year School Contact Information - Most Recent Year District Name Washington Unified School District School Name Sacramento Valley Charter Phone Number (916) 375-7600 Street 2399 Sellers Way Superintendent Linda C. Luna City, State, Zip West Sacramento, Ca, 95691-3046 E-mail Address lluna@wusd.k12.ca.us Phone Number 916-596-6422 Web Site http://www.wusd.k12.ca.us Principal Sheila Gibson, Principal E-mail Address sgibson.svcs@gmail.com Web Site www.sacvalleycharter.org County-District- 57726940124875 School (CDS) Code School Description and Mission Statement - Most Recent Year School Description and Mission Statement - Most Recent Year SACRAMENTO VALLEY CHARTER SCHOOL Home of the Lions! Our mission is to create an inspiring and challenging learning environment for our children and to promote a culture of strong social and family values. Our Vision: A charter school with strong community support and participation that provides a rigorous, standards based curriculum and individualized support for all children. A safe and compassionate learning environment that promotes love of learning among children while meeting their academic, social, and emotional needs. A highly professional, fully certified staff that builds an uncompromising commitment to learn, compete and excel. The Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) is a comprehensive planning tool to describe and guide school action and expenditure to meet students' goals for students' achievement. The LCAP was approved by the Board of Directors in 2014 and is reviewed annually for updates. Special Program: All students at SVCS learn California World Language Program in the subject of Punjabi which is one of the Indo-European Languages. Students study the language for 40 minutes every day. The World Language Program is intended to support the core curriculum in ELA and Mathematics and is fully aligned with the common core content standards. According to the latest research, learning another language develops students intellectually, emotionally and personally. School Leadership School leadership is a shared responsibility of the administration, staff, students and parents. The Board of Directors is the major governing body that meets monthly to develop school policies and discuss components of the school program for effective implementation of school mission, goals and vision. Staff members, parents and teachers participate in various ways to discuss the board decisions regarding the priority and directions of the school to maintain students' enrollment and a balanced school experience. Page 2 of 26

Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2014-15) Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2014-15) Grade Level Number of Students Kindergarten 26 50 Grade 1 24 Grade 2 47 40 Grade 3 36 Grade 4 27 Grade 5 19 Grade 6 20 Grade 7 18 30 20 Grade 8 23 Total Enrollment 240 10 0 KindergartenGrade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Student Enrollment by (School Year 2014-15) Student Enrollment by (School Year 2014-15) of Total Enrollment Black or African American 0.4 % American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0 % Asian 96.3 % Filipino 0.0 % Hispanic or Latino 1.7 % Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.4 % White 0.4 % Two or More Races 0.4 % Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 12.5 % English Learners 28.8 % Students with Disabilities 0.0 % Foster Youth 0.0 % Page 3 of 26

A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair Teacher Credentials Teacher Credentials Teachers School District 2013-14 2014-15 With Full Credential 11 10 2015-16 2015-16 12 10 Teachers with Full Credential Teachers without Full Credential Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence Without Full Credential 1 2 Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0 0 8 6 4 2 0 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Indicator Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 2013-14 2014-15 0 1 2015-16 1.2 1.0 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments Vacant Teacher Positions Total Teacher Misassignments* 0 1 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English learners. Page 4 of 26

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2014-15) Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2014-15) Location of Classes of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 100.0% 0.0% All Schools in District 100.0% 0.0% High-Poverty Schools in District Low-Poverty Schools in District 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Lowpoverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent Year Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials - Most Recent Year Year and month in which data were collected: January 2010 Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/year of Adoption From Most Recent Adoption? Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy Reading/Language Arts Prentice Hall (K-8) Yes 0.0 % Mathematics Holt, Rhinert & Winston (K-2, 4,5), Go Math (3rd-5th grade), Prentice Hall (6,7,8) Yes 0.0 % Science Harcourt and Brace Yes 0.0 % History-Social Science Glencoe (K-8) Yes 0.0 % Foreign Language 0.0 % Health 0.0 % Visual and Performing Arts 0.0 % Science Lab Eqpmt (Grades 9-12) 0.0 % Page 5 of 26

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements - Most Recent Year School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements - Most Recent Year A new building was constructed in August, 2014. This building houses the office, six classrooms, three restrooms, lounge, storage room, and multi-purpose room. The other building houses seven classrooms, lounge, and computer lab. The following is a list of items inspected by building manager, and school administration. -Systems: Gas system and pipes, Mechanical System(heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) Sewer Interior: floors, ceilings walls, and window casings, screens Cleanliness: Pest control, school grounds, common areas, classrooms Electrical: System interior and exterior Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, sinks, drinking fountain, (interior/exterior) Safety: Fire safety equipment, emergency systems (interior/exterior) Structural: Structural conditions, stairs, parking lot, elevator (interior/exterior) School Facility Good Repair Status - Most Recent Year Year and month in which data were collected: June 2014 System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Rating Good Good Good Fair Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned Completed infrastructure wiring, February 2015 Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/Doors/Gates/Fences Good Good Good Good Screens replaced on some windows Overall Facility Rate - Most Recent Year Year and month in which data were collected: June 2014 Overall Rating Good Page 6 of 26

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP], Science California Standards Tests); and The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results for All Students (School Year 2014-15) California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results for All Students (School Year 2014-15) of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards Subject School District State English Language Arts / Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) 32.0% 36.0% 44.0% Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11) 38.0% 26.0% 33.0% Note: ages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students tested is ten or less. Page 7 of 26

CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA) CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA) Disaggregated by s, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven (School Year 2014-15) Disaggregated by s, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven (School Year 2014-15) ELA - Grade 3 ELA - Grade 3 Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 38 35 92.1% 37.0% 34.0% 17.0% 9.0% Male 38 21 55.3% 43.0% 29.0% 19.0% 10.0% Female 38 14 36.8% 29.0% 43.0% 14.0% 7.0% Black or African American 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 38 29 76.3% 38.0% 28.0% 21.0% 10.0% Filipino 38 1 2.6% -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 38 3 7.9% -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 38 1 2.6% -- -- -- -- White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 38 10 26.3% -- -- -- -- English Learners 38 8 21.1% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 8 of 26

ELA - Grade 4 ELA - Grade 4 Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 26 25 96.2% 52.0% 20.0% 12.0% 16.0% Male 26 13 50.0% 62.0% 15.0% 8.0% 15.0% Female 26 12 46.2% 42.0% 25.0% 17.0% 17.0% Black or African American 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 26 25 96.2% 52.0% 20.0% 12.0% 16.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 26 0 0.0% -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 26 5 19.2% -- -- -- -- English Learners 26 9 34.6% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 9 of 26

ELA - Grade 5 ELA - Grade 5 Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 18 16 88.9% 88.0% 6.0% 6.0% 0.0% Male 18 12 66.7% 83.0% 8.0% 8.0% 0.0% Female 18 4 22.2% -- -- -- -- Black or African American 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 18 16 88.9% 88.0% 6.0% 6.0% 0.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 18 1 5.6% -- -- -- -- English Learners 18 6 33.3% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 10 of 26

ELA- Grade 6 Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 22 20 90.9% 5.0% 40.0% 40.0% 15.0% Male 22 8 36.4% -- -- -- -- Female 22 12 54.5% 0.0% 33.0% 42.0% 25.0% Black or African American 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 22 19 86.4% 5.0% 37.0% 42.0% 16.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 22 1 4.5% -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 22 2 9.1% -- -- -- -- English Learners 22 2 9.1% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 11 of 26

ELA - Grade 7 ELA - Grade 7 Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 18 16 88.9% 25.0% 44.0% 25.0% 6.0% Male 18 9 50.0% -- -- -- -- Female 18 7 38.9% -- -- -- -- Black or African American 18 1 5.6% -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 18 15 83.3% 27.0% 40.0% 27.0% 7.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 18 3 16.7% -- -- -- -- English Learners 18 5 27.8% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 12 of 26

ELA - Grade 8 ELA - Grade 8 Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 24 24 100.0% 8.0% 46.0% 46.0% 0.0% Male 24 12 50.0% 17.0% 67.0% 17.0% 0.0% Female 24 12 50.0% 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0% Black or African American 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 24 24 100.0% 8.0% 46.0% 46.0% 0.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 24 2 8.3% -- -- -- -- English Learners 24 1 4.2% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 13 of 26

CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics Disaggregated by s, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven (School Year 2014-15) Disaggregated by s, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven (School Year 2014-15) Mathematics - Grade 3 Mathematics - Grade 3 Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 38 35 92.1% 11.0% 40.0% 40.0% 9.0% Male 38 21 55.3% 10.0% 29.0% 52.0% 10.0% Female 38 14 36.8% 14.0% 57.0% 21.0% 7.0% Black or African American 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 38 29 76.3% 7.0% 41.0% 45.0% 7.0% Filipino 38 1 2.6% -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 38 3 7.9% -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 38 1 2.6% -- -- -- -- White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 38 10 26.3% -- -- -- -- English Learners 38 8 21.1% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 14 of 26

Mathematics - Grade 4 Mathematics - Grade 4 Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 26 25 96.2% 28.0% 40.0% 20.0% 12.0% Male 26 13 50.0% 23.0% 38.0% 23.0% 15.0% Female 26 12 46.2% 33.0% 42.0% 17.0% 8.0% Black or African American 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 26 25 96.2% 28.0% 40.0% 20.0% 12.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 26 0 0.0% -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 26 5 19.2% -- -- -- -- English Learners 26 9 34.6% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 15 of 26

Mathematics - Grade 5 Mathematics - Grade 5 Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 18 16 88.9% 56.0% 38.0% 6.0% 0.0% Male 18 12 66.7% 58.0% 33.0% 8.0% 0.0% Female 18 4 22.2% -- -- -- -- Black or African American 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 18 16 88.9% 56.0% 38.0% 6.0% 0.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 18 1 5.6% -- -- -- -- English Learners 18 6 33.3% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 16 of 26

Mathematics - Grade 6 Mathematics - Grade 6 Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 22 20 90.9% 10.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% Male 22 8 36.4% -- -- -- -- Female 22 12 54.5% 8.0% 25.0% 42.0% 25.0% Black or African American 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 22 19 86.4% 5.0% 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 22 1 4.5% -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 22 2 9.1% -- -- -- -- English Learners 22 2 9.1% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 17 of 26

Mathematics - Grade 7 Mathematics - Grade 7 Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 18 16 88.9% 19.0% 50.0% 19.0% 13.0% Male 18 9 50.0% -- -- -- -- Female 18 7 38.9% -- -- -- -- Black or African American 18 1 5.6% -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 18 15 83.3% 20.0% 47.0% 20.0% 13.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 18 3 16.7% -- -- -- -- English Learners 18 5 27.8% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 18 of 26

Mathematics - Grade 8 Mathematics - Grade 8 Total Enrollment Number Level 1* Level 2* Level 3* Level 4* All Students 24 24 100.0% 38.0% 25.0% 25.0% 13.0% Male 24 12 50.0% 50.0% 25.0% 17.0% 8.0% Female 24 12 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 33.0% 17.0% Black or African American 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 24 24 100.0% 38.0% 25.0% 25.0% 13.0% Filipino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic or Latino 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 24 2 8.3% -- -- -- -- English Learners 24 1 4.2% -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Foster Youth -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores. * Level 1 = Standard not met Level 2 = Standard nearly met Level 3 = Standard met Level 4 = Standard exceeded Page 19 of 26

California Standards Tests for All Students in Science Three-Year Comparison California Standards Tests for All Students in Science Three-Year Comparison of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State Subject 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 45.0% 58.0% 57.0% 53.0% 54.0% 53.0% 59.0% 60.0% 56.0% Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students tested is ten or less. California Standards Tests Results by in Science (School Year 2014-15) of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced All Students in the LEA 53.0% All Students at the School 57.0% Male 56.0% Female 75.0% Black or African American -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- Asian 57.0% Filipino -- Hispanic or Latino -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- White -- Two or More Races -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- English Learners -- Students with Disabilities -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- Foster Youth -- Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students tested is ten or less. Page 20 of 26

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8): Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of English, mathematics, and physical education California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2014-15) California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2014-15) of Students Meeting Fitness Standards Grade Level Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards 5 25.0% 31.2% 25.0% 7 11.8% 41.2% 35.3% Note: ages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Page 21 of 26

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite Opportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent Year Opportunities for Parental Involvement - Most Recent Year Parents and the community are very supportive of the educational program at Sacramento Valley Charter School. Parents can participate in PTO (Parent Teacher Organization) and activities at the school that support student council and field trips. Parent volunteers are encouraged to work with staff and administration on a variety of tasks. Parents who wish to become involved in school activities are encouraged to call the office at 916 596-6422 and leave a message for teachers and/or PTO President. All parents are invited to attend Scholar s Award Assemblies every first Thursday of the month. School Leadership School leadership is a shared responsibility of the administration, staff, students and parents. The Board of Directors is the major governing body that meets monthly to develop school policies and discuss components of the school program for effective implementation of school mission, goals and vision. Staff members, parents and teachers participate in various ways to discuss the board decisions regarding the priority and directions of the school to maintain students' enrollment and a balanced school experience. State Priority: Pupil Engagement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Engagement (Priority 5): High school dropout rates; and High school graduation rates Page 22 of 26

State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety Suspensions and Expulsions Suspensions and Expulsions School District State Rate 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Suspensions 0.4 0.4 2.0 6.3 6.0 4.7 5.1 4.4 3.8 Expulsions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Suspensions Expulsions 7 6 School Suspensions District Suspensions State Suspensions 0.12 0.10 School Expulsions District Expulsions State Expulsions 5 0.08 4 0.06 3 0.04 2 1 0.02 0 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 0.00 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 School Safety Plan - Most Recent Year A safe campus is crucial to effective learning. The Board of Directors approved a Comprehensive School Safety Plan in 2011. Annual reviews occur in February of each year. Access to the school by members of the public is controlled by fencing, video cameras and all visitors must be approved by administration. Visitors must also sign-in and wear a visible visitor pass at all times while on the school site. The office has eight screen monitor on the premises, inside of hallway, multi-purpose room and exterior of building. The parking lot is well lit and allows for safe activities after dark. The School safety plan has procedures for fire drill, earthquake, tornado, lockdown and health emergencies. The plan is shared with the students, staff, parents and reviewed with Board of Directors. A copy of the plan is kept in our administrative office. We are proud of our zero-tolerance bullying policy. Our students are respectful and considerate of others and live up to our school motto, Learn, Compete, Excel. We accept students all year and invite you to tell others about us and join our school community. Page 23 of 26

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2014-15) Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2014-15) AYP Criteria School District State Made AYP Overall Yes No Met Participation Rate - English Language Arts Yes Yes Met Participation Rate - Mathematics Yes Yes Met Proficient - English Language Arts N/A N/A Met Proficient - Mathematics N/A N/A Met Attendance Rate Met Graduation Rate N/A No Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Level Total Expenditures Per Pupil Expenditures Per Pupil (Supplemental/Restricted) Expenditures Per Pupil (Basic/Unrestricted) Average Teacher Salary School Site -- -- -- -- District N/A N/A $0.0 $59003.0 Difference School Site and District N/A N/A -- -- State N/A N/A $5348.0 $69257.0 Difference School Site and State N/A N/A -- -- Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Page 24 of 26

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2014-15) Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2014-15) Services and Programs to support Common Core instruction include: Instructional Support Personnel in core subjects English Language Learner Support Instructional Material Field Trips Home to School Transportation Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $35,000 $42,315 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $59,136 $66,451 Highest Teacher Salary $79,653 $85,603 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $91,135 $105,079 Average Principal Salary (Middle) $96,005 $111,005 Average Principal Salary (High) $105,658 $121,310 Superintendent Salary $173,309 $189,899 of Budget for Teacher Salaries 40.0% 39.0% of Budget for Administrative Salaries 6.0% 6.0% For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Teacher Salary Chart Principal Salary Chart 90000 120000 80000 70000 60000 100000 80000 50000 60000 40000 30000 40000 20000 20000 10000 0 Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary 0 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) Average Principal Salary (Middle) Average Principal Salary (High) Professional Development Most Recent Three Years SVCS provides high quality, research based staff development in the areas of Common Core Standards (CCS) implementation strategies, writing across the curriculum and other subject area content. Seven teachers are provided BTSA (Beginning Teacher S Assistance) in the area of California Professional Standards for Teaching (CPSTS), student assessment, classroom management, and classroom strategies that include working with English language learners. For the 2014-15 school year, SVCS dedicates one day each month to staff development training. In 2012-13 and 2013-14 no days were dedicated to professional development. Page 25 of 26

Page 26 of 26