California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Engage Educate Empower

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Val Verde Unified School District

Shelters Elementary School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Kahului Elementary School

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Hokulani Elementary School

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Cooper Upper Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Val Verde Unified School District

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout

World s Best Workforce Plan

African American Male Achievement Update

University of Arizona

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

12-month Enrollment

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY


Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Educational Attainment

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Cuero Independent School District

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

State Budget Update February 2016

California State University EAP Updates 2016

46 Children s Defense Fund

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Clark Lane Middle School

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Academic Advising and Career Exploration. PLTW State Conference 2015 Bayless School District

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Long Beach Unified School District

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Campus Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Transcription:

KIPP Promesa Prep California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2015-16 School Year By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians, and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners). Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. Adriana Rodriguez, Principal Principal, KIPP Promesa Prep About Our School About Our School At KIPP Promesa Prep, we believe that when schools provide an excellent education, they provide the path for students and families to transform communities. At KIPP Promesa Prep, every student thrives in a rigorous academic program focused on literacy, nurtures a strong sense of self through character development, and celebrates the enduring legacy of our community. Students will leave KIPP Promesa as proud and driven leaders that take risks, persevere, and positively impact their community and society through their thoughts and actions. Promesa means promise in Spanish. As a school, we are promising students, families, and the community that a quality education from elementary on will provide a better future. We are making the promise of nurturing students academically, socially, and behaviorally so that they become the leaders of tomorrow. We are promising to send our students to and through college, and to be an enduring part of their lives. KIPP Promesa Prep is a tuition-free public charter elementary school that opened in August of 2015 in Boyle Heights. KIPP Promesa Prep currently serves 225 kindergarten and first grade students and will add one grade each year until we reach capacity in 2019 with 555 students in kindergarten through fourth grade. KIPP Promesa Prep is part of the renowned national KIPP (Knowledge is Power Program) network of schools. The school is operated by KIPP LA Schools, a charter school management organization. Contact KIPP Promesa Prep 207 South Dacotah St. Los Angeles, CA 90063-3023 Phone: 323-486-6400 E-mail: arodriguez@kippla.org

About This School Contact Information (School Year 2016-17) Contact Information (School Year 2016-17) District Contact Information (School Year 2016-17) School Contact Information (School Year 2016-17) District Name Los Angeles Unified School Name KIPP Promesa Prep Phone Number (213) 241-1000 Street 207 South Dacotah St. Superintendent Michelle King City, State, Zip Los Angeles, Ca, 90063-3023 E-mail Address michelle.king@lausd.net Phone Number 323-486-6400 Web Site www.lausd.net Principal Adriana Rodriguez, Principal E-mail Address arodriguez@kippla.org Web Site www.kippla.org/promesa County-District- 19647330131797 School (CDS) Code Last updated: 1/17/2017 School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2016-17) School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2016-17) KIPP Promesa Vision Statement We believe that when schools provide an excellent education, they provide the path for students and families to transform communities. At KIPP Promesa Prep, every student thrives in a rigorous academic program focused on literacy, nurtures a strong sense of self through character development, and celebrates the enduring legacy of our community. Students will leave KIPP Promesa as proud and driven leaders that take risks, persevere, and positively impact their community and society through their thoughts and actions. Last updated: 1/6/2017 Page 2 of 33

Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2015-16) Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2015-16) Grade Level Number of Students Kindergarten 120 Total Enrollment 120 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Kindergarten Last updated: 1/17/2017 Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2015-16) Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2015-16) Student Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American 0.4 % American Indian or Alaska Native 0.0 % Asian 0.4 % Filipino 0.0 % Hispanic or Latino 99.4 % Last updated: 2/1/2017 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.0 % White 0.0 % Two or More Races 2.7 % Other -2.9 % Student Group (Other) Percent of Total Enrollment Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 89.8 % English Learners 43.1 % Students with Disabilities 7.6 % Foster Youth 0.0 % Page 3 of 33

A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair Teacher Credentials Teacher Credentials Teachers School District 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 With Full Credential 3 11 2016-17 12 10 Teachers with Full Credential Teachers without Full Credential Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence Without Full Credential 4 2 Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0 0 8 6 4 2 0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Last updated: 2/1/2017 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Indicator Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 0 0 1.0 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments Vacant Teacher Positions Total Teacher Misassignments* 0 0 0.5 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 0.0-0.5-1.0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English learners. Last updated: 2/1/2017 Page 4 of 33

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2015-16) Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2015-16) Location of Classes Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 100.0% 0.0% All Schools in District 92.0% 8.0% High-Poverty Schools in District Low-Poverty Schools in District 92.0% 9.0% 98.0% 2.0% Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Lowpoverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2016-17) Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2016-17) Year and month in which data were collected: January 2016 Last updated: 2/1/2017 Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/year of Adoption From Most Recent Adoption? Percent Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy Reading/Language Arts At KIPP Promesa Prep we use the Wonders Curriculum for Language Arts and STEP as an assesment tool. Yes 0.0 % Mathematics KIPP Promesa is currently using Eureka Math and Calendar Math for their mathematics curriculum. This curriculum is California State Standards aligned. Yes 0.0 % Science KIPP Promesa Prep is currently using The FOSS Next Generations Science Kits for Science instruction. This curriculum is California States Standards aligned. Yes 0.0 % History-Social Science KIPP Promesa currently uses Pearson's History of Social Science-California for their social studies. This curriculum is California States Standards aligned. Yes 0.0 % Foreign Language KIPP Promesa Prep currently uses the Maravillas Spanish Curriculum for all students. This curriculum is California Standards aligned. Yes 0.0 % Health 0.0 % Visual and Performing Arts Science Lab Eqpmt (Grades 9-12) Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. 0.0 % N/A N/A 0.0 % Page 5 of 33

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements The campus at KIPP Promesa Prep is inspected monthly for safety and cleanliness. At this time we are not planning any facility improvements. In July, all new first grade classrooms, were painted and new carpeting was installed. New furniture and rugs were purchased for every first grade classroom. All other rooms received an intense cleaning and a carpet deep cleaning. In November of 2015 new asphalt was poured over the entire blacktop. School Facility Good Repair Status Year and month of the most recent FIT report: December 2016 Last updated: 1/20/2017 System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Rating Good Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned No repairs needed at this time. Interior: Interior Surfaces Good No repairs needed at this time. Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Good Good No repairs needed at this time. Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/Fountains Good All restrooms and drinking fountains are in good working conditions. Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Good KIPP Promesa Prep inspects their fire equipment and extinguishers on a yearly basis. No repairs needed at this time. Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs Good No repairs needed at this time. External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/Doors/Gates/Fences Good Overall Facility Rate Year and month of the most recent FIT report: December 2016 Overall Rating Good Last updated: 1/20/2017 Page 6 of 33

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for students in the general education population and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] and mathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. The CAAs have replaced the California Alternate Performance Assessment [CAPA] for ELA and mathematics, which were eliminated in 2015. Only eligible students may participate in the administration of the CAAs. CAA items are aligned with alternate achievement standards, which are linked with the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students with significant cognitive disabilities); and The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. CAASPP Test Results in English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA) and Mathematics for All Students CAASPP Test Results in English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA) and Mathematics for All Students Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards School District State Subject 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 English Language Arts / Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) -- -- -- -- -- -- Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11) -- -- -- -- -- -- Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Page 7 of 33

CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2015-16) Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2015-16) ELA - Grade 3 ELA - Grade 3 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 8 of 33

ELA - Grade 4 ELA - Grade 4 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 9 of 33

ELA - Grade 5 ELA - Grade 5 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 10 of 33

ELA- Grade 6 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 11 of 33

ELA - Grade 7 ELA - Grade 7 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 12 of 33

ELA - Grade 8 ELA - Grade 8 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 13 of 33

ELA - Grade 11 ELA - Grade 11 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 14 of 33

CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2015-16) Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2015-16) Mathematics - Grade 3 Mathematics - Grade 3 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 15 of 33

Mathematics - Grade 4 Mathematics - Grade 4 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 16 of 33

Mathematics - Grade 5 Mathematics - Grade 5 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 17 of 33

Mathematics - Grade 6 Mathematics - Grade 6 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 18 of 33

Mathematics - Grade 7 Mathematics - Grade 7 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 19 of 33

Mathematics - Grade 8 Mathematics - Grade 8 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 20 of 33

Mathematics - Grade 11 Mathematics - Grade 11 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 21 of 33

CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced School District State Subject 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) -- -- -- -- -- -- 60.0% 56.0% 54.0% Note: Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) in grades five, eight, and ten. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. CAASPP Tests Results in Science by Student Group Grades Five, Eight and Grade Ten (School Year 2015-16) Student Group Total Enrollment Number of Students with Valid Scores Percent of Students with Valid Scores Percent Proficient or Advanced All Students -- -- -- -- Male -- -- -- -- Female -- -- -- -- Black or African American -- -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino -- -- -- -- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White -- -- -- -- Two or More Races -- -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- -- -- -- English Learners -- -- -- -- Students with Disabilities -- -- -- -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services -- -- -- -- Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Science test results include CSTs, CMA, and CAPA in grades five, eight, and ten. The Proficient or Advanced is calculated by taking the total number of students who scored at Proficient or Advanced on the science assessment divided by the total number of students with valid scores. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2015-16) Career Technical Education Participation (School Year 2015-16) Measure CTE Program Participation Number of Pupils Participating in CTE Percent of Pupils Completing a CTE Program and Earning a High School Diploma -- Percent of CTE Courses Sequenced or Articulated Between the School and Institutions of Postsecondary Education -- Page 22 of 33

Courses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) Admission Courses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) Admission UC/CSU Course Measure Percent 2015-16 Pupils Enrolled in Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission -- 2014-15 Graduates Who Completed All Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 0.0% Page 23 of 33

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8): Pupil outcomes in the subject area of physical education California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2015-16) California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2015-16) Percentage of Students Meeting Fitness Standards Grade Level Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Page 24 of 33

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2016-17) Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2016-17) KIPP Promesa has a Parent Advisory Council (PAC) where parents can support school operations and participate in the realization of the school vision. PAC meeets monthly during the school year. All members of our school community are invited to attend. Twice each quarter we host a family night that is centered in the learning of our students. Parent workshops have a K-1 cope and sequence to ensure that families are able to build on their prior knowledge and continue to receive information and resources to plan for their child s future. We know that the climb to college is going to require a lot of hard work and that our students will need the support from their family to get to and through. Our family nights are centered in informing our families and empowering them to be active participants in our school community and celebrate their children s growth over the year(s). Annually we engage our parents in the review and development of our schools' LCAP. State Priority: Pupil Engagement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Engagement (Priority 5): High school dropout rates; and High school graduation rates Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) School District State Indicator 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Dropout Rate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.4% 11.5% 10.7% Graduation Rate 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.80 82.60 83.30 80.44 80.95 82.27 Dropout/Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Chart 1.0 Dropout Rate Graduation Rate 0.5 0.0-0.5-1.0 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Page 25 of 33

Page 26 of 33

Completion of High School Graduation Requirements - Graduating Class of 2015 Completion of High School Graduation Requirements - Graduating Class of 2015 (One-Year Rate) (One-Year Rate) Student Group School District State All Students -- 86 85 Black or African American -- 82 77 American Indian or Alaska Native -- 80 75 Asian -- 90 99 Filipino -- 91 97 Hispanic or Latino -- 86 84 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- 86 85 White -- 88 87 Two or More Races -- 93 91 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -- 86 77 English Learners -- 39 51 Students with Disabilities -- 57 68 Foster Youth -- -- -- Page 27 of 33

State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety Suspensions and Expulsions Suspensions and Expulsions School District State Rate 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Suspensions 0.0 4.4 3.8 3.7 Expulsions 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Suspensions Expulsions 5.0 4.0 School Suspensions District Suspensions State Suspensions 0.12 0.10 School Expulsions District Expulsions State Expulsions 0.08 3.0 0.06 2.0 0.04 1.0 0.02 0.0 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 0.00 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 School Safety Plan (School Year 2016-17) Last updated: 2/1/2017 KIPP Promesa Prep's school Safety Plan has various components to help ensure the safety of our students and staff. It includes safety drills, monthly facility walkthroughs, and a thorough Incident Command System plan which was updated October 2016. Last updated: 2/1/2017 Page 28 of 33

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2016-17) Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2016-17) Indicator School District Program Improvement Status In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2004-2005 Year in Program Improvement Year 3 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 645 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 71.2% Note: Cells with NA values do not require data. Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Grade Level Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ K 29.0 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 Other * Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class). Last updated: 1/20/2017 Page 29 of 33

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Subject English Mathematics Science Social Science Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-22 23-32 33+ * Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level. Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2015-16) Last updated: 1/20/2017 Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor Academic Counselor Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) Library Media Teacher (librarian) Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) N/A N/A N/A Psychologist 0.3 N/A Social Worker 0.2 N/A Nurse 0.1 N/A Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 0.1 N/A Resource Specialist (non-teaching) 0.5 N/A Other 0.1 N/A Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. *One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15) Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15) Last updated: 2/1/2017 Level Total Expenditures Per Pupil Expenditures Per Pupil (Supplemental/Restricted) Expenditures Per Pupil (Basic/Unrestricted) Average Teacher Salary School Site $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 District N/A N/A $0.0 $72495.0 Percent Difference School Site and District -- -- 0.0% 0.0% State N/A N/A $5677.0 $75837.0 Percent Difference School Site and State -- -- 0.0% 0.0% Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Last updated: 2/1/2017 Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15) Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15) Page 30 of 33

Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $42,207 $45,092 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $67,417 $71,627 Highest Teacher Salary $83,703 $93,288 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $107,190 $115,631 Average Principal Salary (Middle) $121,149 $120,915 Average Principal Salary (High) $124,798 $132,029 Superintendent Salary $350,000 $249,537 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 34.0% 37.0% Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5.0% 5.0% For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Teacher Salary Chart Principal Salary Chart 90000 140000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 120000 100000 80000 60000 30000 20000 40000 20000 10000 0 Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary 0 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) Average Principal Salary (Middle) Average Principal Salary (High) Last updated: 1/13/2017 Page 31 of 33

Advanced Placement (AP) Courses (School Year 2015-16) Advanced Placement (AP) Courses (School Year 2015-16) Subject Number of AP Courses Offered* Percent of Students In AP Courses Computer Science English Fine and Performing Arts Foreign Language Mathematics Science Social Science N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Courses -- Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. *Where there are student course enrollments of at least one student. Last updated: 1/13/2017 Page 32 of 33

Professional Development Professional Development Each week 2 hours are scheduled for teacher professional development. The professional development schedule is set over the summer for the first half of the school year and a tentative schedule is set for the second half of the year. The areas of focus are determined based on a combination of logistical/administrative concerns and curricular needs. Professional development focuses are spread out throughout the year. Most of the professional development trainings are delivered during after school workshops. KIPP Promesa also has a STEP curriculum trainer that comes trains our teacher three times a year. Teachers are also supported through in-class observations, teacher-administrator meetings, and student performance data reporting. Teachers also attend conferences throughout the school year. Last updated: 1/13/2017 Page 33 of 33