Request for Proposals Regional Opportunity Initiatives, Inc. Southwest Central Indiana Ready Schools Initiative Development Grant

Similar documents
ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

State Budget Update February 2016

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

CTE Teacher Preparation Class Schedule Career and Technical Education Business and Industry Route Teacher Preparation Program

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Race to the Top (RttT) Monthly Report for US Department of Education (USED) NC RttT February 2014

CURRICULUM PROCEDURES REFERENCE MANUAL. Section 3. Curriculum Program Application for Existing Program Titles (Procedures and Accountability Report)

The Teaching and Learning Center

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

District Advisory Committee. October 27, 2015

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

2. Sibling of a continuing student at the school requested. 3. Child of an employee of Anaheim Union High School District.

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS CALENDAR

University of Massachusetts Lowell Graduate School of Education Program Evaluation Spring Online

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Public School Choice DRAFT

Engaging Faculty in Reform:

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

UH STEM Pathways Project

Program Guidebook. Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

Academic Affairs Policy #1

AAC/BOT Page 1 of 9

ADULT VOCATIONAL TRAINING PROGRAM APPLICATION

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

The IDN Variant Issues Project: A Study of Issues Related to the Delegation of IDN Variant TLDs. 20 April 2011

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Welcome to the University of Hertfordshire and the MSc Environmental Management programme, which includes the following pathways:

University of Toronto

ACCA PROSPECTUS JAN-JUN 2018 SEMESTER 1 SANDTON CAMPUS BECOME YOUR VISION, A CHARTERED FINANCE PROFESSIONAL!

Distinguished Teacher Review

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

In 2010, the Teach Plus-Indianapolis Teaching Policy Fellows, a cohort of early career educators teaching

Rachel Edmondson Adult Learner Analyst Jaci Leonard, UIC Analyst

Programme Specification

The mission of the Grants Office is to secure external funding for college priorities via local, state, and federal funding sources.

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Hokulani Elementary School

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

university of wisconsin MILWAUKEE Master Plan Report

Sec123. Volleyball. 52 Resident Registration begins Aug. 5 Non-resident Registration begins Aug. 14

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

GRADUATE SCHOOL DOCTORAL DISSERTATION AWARD APPLICATION FORM

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Department of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *

IDS 240 Interdisciplinary Research Methods

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

COURSE LISTING. Courses Listed. Training for Cloud with SAP SuccessFactors in Integration. 23 November 2017 (08:13 GMT) Beginner.

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

NC Global-Ready Schools

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

PUBLIC SCHOOL OPEN ENROLLMENT POLICY FOR INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL DISTRICT

Comprehensive Student Services Program Review

OKURA SETS UP GLOBAL BUSINESS HEADQUARTERS IN SINGAPORE

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct

WE ARE EXCITED TO HAVE ALL OF OUR FFG KIDS BACK FOR OUR SCHOOL YEAR PROGRAM! WE APPRECIATE YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT AS WE HEAD INTO OUR 8 TH SEASON!

Transcription:

Request for Proposals Regional Opportunity Initiatives, Inc. Southwest Central Indiana Ready Schools Initiative Development Grant Dates: RFP released Wednesday, April 26, 2017. Informational webinar Monday, May 8, 2017. Proposals due Friday, May 26, 2017. Respond to: Todd Hurst, Director of Education and Workforce, Regional Opportunity Initiatives, 100 South College Avenue, Suite 240, Bloomington, IN 47404; 812.287.8116 ext. 106; thurst@swcindiana.org Purpose: For Southwest Central Indiana (SWCI) to fulfill its potential, community stakeholders across the region must strategically and purposefully pursue a shared vision of success. Our schools, our employers, and our communities must come together to ensure we are prepared to achieve, advance, and excel. Prosperity, quality of life, and the capacity to sustain both will require that the region be Ready and Aligned. The Ready Schools Initiative is a framework to support school districts in aligning their programs to community and regional workforce needs using the results of the ONA as a resource. Within our region, this workforce need is most pressing in our three key industry sectors: life sciences, defense, and advanced manufacturing. The goal of this work is to enable schools to engage stakeholders in meaningful dialogue about what success means within their community and to develop a plan to obtain that success. The result of this process will be a systemic approach designed to support students in achieving their academic and career goals aligned with the wealth of opportunities in SWCI. Regional Opportunity Initiatives, Inc. (ROI) developed the Ready Schools Initiative based largely upon the design thinking framework of the global design company IDEO and the coalition building processes from CivicLab. Districts within the 11-county region of Southwest Central Indiana served by ROI are welcome to apply to be a Ready Schools district. If selected, districts will receive funding and coaching through a one year development process and will be eligible to pursue implementation funding through ROI at the end of the development grant period. Background and Rationale: Beginning in 2014, leaders from across Southwest Central Indiana came together to elevate educational attainment, to better meet the needs of local employers, and increase quality of life in our region. The statistics for high school graduation rates and post-secondary attainment in Southwest Central Indiana are sobering. SWCI data (2015) for adults aged 25 years or older confirms that we have a long way to go if we are to achieve the goal of 60% post-secondary credentialing, the benchmark set by Indiana and Lumina Foundation for regional post-secondary attainment. In our 11 served counties: 4.72% have less than a 9 th grade education 8.33% have attended high school but do not have a diploma 36.22% possess a high school diploma or equivalency 18.25% have some post-secondary education but did not earn a degree 8.68% have been awarded an associate s degree 12.90% earned a bachelor s degree 10.89% have a graduate or professional degree 1

At present, 32.47% of our region s potential workforce holds some form of post-secondary credentialing. While this data does not reflect attainment of certificates or other proof of skill, Southwest Central Indiana is well below the desired target of 60% post-secondary credentialing. For this region to reach this 60% benchmark, 70,000 additional residents must attain some kind of post-secondary degree, certificate, or credential. Regional Opportunity Initiative s (ROI) Occupational Needs Assessment (ONA) emphasizes the importance of clear student skill pathways to meet the workforce needs within our region, to support growth in our key sectors, and to attract talent to Southwest Central Indiana (SWCI). Currently, SWCI is home to over 27,000 jobs in the life science, defense, and advanced manufacturing sectors. Employers within those sectors foresee growth in SWCI but report that the quality and availability of workforce is a limiting factor. A major finding from the ONA is the cross compatibility of competencies across all our key sectors- that is, many of the same science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) skills are required for a wide array of careers in our region. A demand-driven, systematic approach to attainment has the potential to prepare students for work in a variety of fields, but particularly in the life sciences, defense, and advanced manufacturing sectors. Developing such skills cannot be solely the responsibility of families and local school systems, but should include a wide range of community stakeholders engaged in supporting and developing the talent needed to meet the demands and opportunities of today and tomorrow. Ready Schools Design Process: The development grant will support participating districts through the first four phases of the Ready Schools design process. This process, developed by ROI and modeled on best practices for systems building and problem solving, includes: Discovery Phase (2 months): The Discovery phase engages design teams in a process of collaboration and data gathering. Through purposeful meetings with key constituencies, community members, and industry partners, the team begins to develop a solid foundation for ideas, discovers deeper community needs, and listens to what others hope for in their community schools. Synthesis Phase (3 months): The Synthesis phase builds on Discovery through learning and exploration. Here, the design team assembles the information gathered from stakeholders and begins to make sense of the needs and hopes of employers, educators, parents, and students. Context is developed by visiting model programs, researching strategies, and exploring relevant models to gain key insights and determine guiding questions. Ideation Phase (2 months): The Ideation phase involves generating solutions. During Ideation, the design team develops process norms, organizes what they have learned, and brainstorms possible solutions to the guiding questions. The goal of Ideation is to create a pool of promising solutions to meet the needs of the community, schools, and students. 2

Refinement Phase (3 months): The Refinement phase brings out the best solutions from Ideation. With feedback and guidance from the original stakeholders, the design team determines what will be done and develops a plan for how they will do it by building timelines, assessing needed resources, and determining roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. The goal of Refinement is to select a course of action and apply for funding to implement within the community and schools. Implementation: With funding from Regional Opportunity Initiatives (ROI) and potentially other sources, districts begin the process of implementing the strategies proposed in their application. Implementation will be supported through technical assistance and guidance by ROI staff and will be expected to commence fall 2018. At the conclusion of the development phase, awardees are eligible to apply for implementation funding from ROI. Building on the framework assembled during the development grant year, districts will begin the process of implementing the strategies proposed. Implementation will be supported through technical assistance and guidance by ROI staff and is expected to commence fall 2018. Cohorts: Up to three districts will receive funding in the first round of the Ready Schools Development Grant. The District Readiness Coordinators will frequently work collaboratively across districts as a cohort. ROI anticipates funding three rounds of cohorts (2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020). Districts that are interested in applying, but may not be ready for Cohort 1 are encouraged to contact ROI regardless to express interest. Eligible Applicants: Any school district within the 11 county region of Southwest Central Indiana served by ROI, including Brown, Crawford, Daviess, Dubois, Greene, Lawrence, Martin, Monroe, Orange, Owen, and Washington, may submit a response to this RFP. Timeframe: Request for Proposals for the development phase of this work will be available on April 26, 2017. District responses will be due Friday, May 26, 2017 by 5pm. Cohort 1 districts will have one school year to proceed through the first four phases of the Ready Schools Design Process to be ready to apply for Implementation funding at the start of the 2018-19 school year. Cohort 1: 2017-18 Discovery Synthesis Ideation Refinement Implementation 2 months (Aug- Sept) 3 months (Oct- Dec) 2 months (Jan- Feb) 3 months (Mar- May) Multi-Year (Aug.+) 2017-18 School Year 2018-2021 School Years 3

Funding: School districts will be granted up to $150,000 for the first year of planning. Up to $100,000 for the District Readiness Coordinator and other indirect staff costs, disbursed in quarterly installments. Up to 50,000 for expenses, exploration, materials, consultants, experts, as needed. Eligible expenses may include: District Readiness Coordinator (this is expected to be equivalent 1.0 FTE), required. Stipends & release time (school team planning sessions, model visits) Visits to model programs Professional development Anticipated Outcomes: Upon completion of this development grant, districts shall have: An implementation plan for alignment with local workforce needs and opportunities A sustainability plan for the outlined strategies A collaborative partnership between education and industry Support: ROI will provide scaffolded support to the District Readiness Coordinator. Support will include resources, coaching, tools, coordination of events, and networking with other District Readiness Coordinators. Responding to the RFP: The submission process for Ready Schools Design Process Development Grant RFP requires: Submission of a narrative responding to the questions in Appendix A. Scheduled interview with ROI. Interviews will take place during the week of June 12-16. Letters of support from relevant stakeholders. Completed Readiness Assessment. Districts are expected to have the superintendent, a building level principal, and a teacher complete the assessment to be submitted on or before May 26th, 2017. The Readiness Assessment may be accessed here: http://bit.ly/roiready. A proposed budget for the development period. Regional Opportunity Initiatives, Inc. (ROI) will notify successful applicants by June 30, 2017. ROI and the partner school district will complete a Memorandum of Understanding for participation. Expectations of District Partners: By submitting an RFP response, school districts: Commit to full engagement and ongoing collaborations with community, higher ed, and industry partners. Fully commits to the Ready Schools design process. Agree to collect and share data relevant to the design process. Agree to participate in research opportunities presented by ROI in association with the development grant process. Appointing a District Readiness Coordinator equivalency of 1.0 full time employee. The school district agrees to work with ROI to select the best candidate for the District Coordinator role. To establish an Education & Workforce Advisory Committee that will inform the district throughout the alignment process. This may be a newly formed group or an existing group within a community that meets the key criteria for an Education & Workforce Advisory Committee. More information about the Ready Schools Design Process can be found at https://swcindiana.org/readyschools 4

Appendix A Development Grant Application District Name: Primary District Contact: Position: District Contact E-Mail: Phone: Please list ALL schools served by your district. Elementary School(s): Middle School(s): High School(s): Other (e.g. Adult Ed, CTE, Alternative School): On a separate document, please respond to the following: 1. Please provide a district snapshot of relevant data and/or information that would help ROI understand your community and student population. Information and data can include, but is not limited to, the following: Enrollment, free & reduced lunch percentages, graduation rates, post-secondary attendance rates, district average ACT/SAT, district average ISTEP, current college and career readiness resources, pathway availability & enrollment, 21st Century Scholars, etc. An explanation of how this information might inform and guide your planning throughout the development grant period? 2. Describe current K-12 education and workforce success strategies in place within the district and make a case for how the Ready Schools Design Process will add value and relevancy. Please include any information on how local industry is currently engaged within the district to help align education plans with regional workforce goals or needs. 3. Describe the district s strengths and anticipated challenges with respect to addressing K-12 education and workforce alignment. (e.g. engaging stakeholders, teachers, industry) 4. How will your district support the District Readiness Coordinator in making necessary time to involve relevant educators and other stakeholders and fully engage them in the design process? 5. Has your team identified possible candidates for the position of District Readiness Coordinator? If so, please include their names and relevant qualifying experience. If not, what is the district s plan for finding the best candidate for this position? Appendix B 5

Evaluation Criteria Proposals will be evaluated by ROI. The rubric below will be used, in conjunction with interview and other data, to assist in scoring proposals. Final award decisions will be based on multiple criteria. Evaluation Criteria Doesn t Meet 0 Partially Meets 1 Meets 2 Exceeds 3 1. The proposal is complete with the appropriate district information, letters of support, and was received in a timely manner. 2. The applying district understands not only what information is known about their college and career readiness system but also what is not known and remains to be discovered. 3. The school district clearly identifies existing support systems and reflects on their student success pathways. (Principle 1) 4. The school district commits to sharing current data on student post-secondary readiness and to using that data throughout the process to guide decisions. (Principle 2) 5. The school district clearly outlines a commitment to providing the time and resources necessary to involve relevant stakeholders and fully engage them in the design process. (Principle 3) 6. Requested stakeholders have completed the online readiness assessment. (Principle 3) 7. The school district clearly identifies current K-12 education & workforce strategies in place within the district and makes a compelling case for how the Ready Schools Design Process will add value and relevancy. (Principle 4) 8. The school district commits to forming an Education & Workforce Advisory Committee that will help to inform the district throughout the alignment process and create a unified plan for regional prosperity. (Principle 5) 9. The school district has identified possible appropriate candidates for the position of District Readiness Coordinator and included their names and relevant qualifying experience. 10. Proposals clearly reflect an understanding of the information in ROI s Occupational Needs Assessments (ONAs). 6