Refocusing Assessment. English

Similar documents
ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

EQuIP Review Feedback

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Pearson Longman Keystone Book D 2013

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

DRA Correlated to Connecticut English Language Arts Curriculum Standards Grade-Level Expectations Grade 4

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Pearson Longman Keystone Book F 2013

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

Epping Elementary School Plan for Writing Instruction Fourth Grade

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Night by Elie Wiesel. Standards Link:

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Fisk Street Primary School

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Language Acquisition Chart

Grade 7. Prentice Hall. Literature, The Penguin Edition, Grade Oregon English/Language Arts Grade-Level Standards. Grade 7

EMC Publishing s C est à toi! Level 3, 2 nd edition Correlated to the Oregon World Language Content Standards

KENTUCKY COGNIT IVE LIT ERACY MODEL UNIT PLANNING TEMPLATE

Grade 6: Module 3A: Unit 2: Lesson 11 Planning for Writing: Introduction and Conclusion of a Literary Analysis Essay

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Parent Academy. Common Core & PARCC

INTRODUCTION TO TEACHING GUIDE

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Teaching Task Rewrite. Teaching Task: Rewrite the Teaching Task: What is the theme of the poem Mother to Son?

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Assessment booklet Assessment without levels and new GCSE s

correlated to the Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards Grades 9-12

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

English 2, Grade 10 Regular, Honors Curriculum Map

This publication is also available for download at

WHO PASSED? Time Frame 30 minutes. Standard Read with Understanding NRS EFL 3-4

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

Essential Learnings Assessing Guide ESSENTIAL LEARNINGS

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

BILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

Reynolds School District Literacy Framework

Grade 5: Module 3A: Overview

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION LLD LANGUAGE ARTS

4 Almost always mention the topic and the overall idea of simple. 3 Oftentimes mention the topic and the overall idea of simple

The Curriculum in Primary Schools

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Pennsylvania Common Core Standards English Language Arts Grade 11

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

success. It will place emphasis on:

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

A. True B. False INVENTORY OF PROCESSES IN COLLEGE COMPOSITION

The Effect of Close Reading on Reading Comprehension. Scores of Fifth Grade Students with Specific Learning Disabilities.

Master s Programme in European Studies

Characteristics of the Text Genre Realistic fi ction Text Structure

Methods: Teaching Language Arts P-8 W EDU &.02. Dr. Jan LaBonty Ed. 309 Office hours: M 1:00-2:00 W 3:00-4:

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Louisiana Free Materials List

Literacy THE KEYS TO SUCCESS. Tips for Elementary School Parents (grades K-2)

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

Business. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification

Cambridge NATIONALS. Creative imedia Level 1/2. UNIT R081 - Pre-Production Skills DELIVERY GUIDE

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

CDE: 1st Grade Reading, Writing, and Communicating Page 2 of 27

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Primary English Curriculum Framework

Transcription:

Refocusing Assessment English 1

Refocusing Assessment English Introduction SSAT, ASCL and NFER have worked together to produce Refocusing Assessment, which is a resource to support schools in developing and reviewing their assessment practice. The resource identifies five key questions for all departments, which you will find below. In the following pages you will also find some responses to each question. These are drawn from the expert panels that SSAT, ASCL and NFER convened, which were comprised of heads of department and representatives from subject associations. These are not intended to offer definitive answers to the key questions, but may help to support, challenge or structure your discussions. For details about the references in this document, please refer to the Refocusing Assessment overview document. How to use this resource 1 Spend time with your department discussing each of the five questions. 2 Record a summary of your discussion. 3 Look at the responses produced by the expert panels. How far do they reflect the thoughts of your team? 4 See if you can summarise the assessment requirements for your subject on the template. 5 You may then be asked to share your responses with other departments to help identify the commonalities and differences between subjects in order to help establish a whole school approach. You may wish to consider the following questions: How do the needs of different subject areas vary? How can you apply best practice in different subject areas whilst also maintaining consistency across the whole school? 6 You may wish to produce an action plan to modify and shape your assessment policy and practice. 7 Set a time to review and evaluate the impact of the action plan on assessment. 2

Five key questions 1 2 3 4 5 What does it mean to be a successful student in What is the purpose of our subject? What does it mean to be a good writer, reader and orator? Is this what we are preparing students for? What are the core knowledge and skills required for success? What is the purpose of assessment in Why do we assess? Who is assessment for? What does progress look like in How do we know when a student is making progress? How might progress vary over time? How can progress be assessed most effectively in Which assessment techniques work best in How successfully do we use formative assessment approaches? How can formative and summative assessment work together to ensure effective assessment for learning? How do the assessment practices in our department contribute to/work with whole school policy? How do we benchmark/ quality assure our assessment practices? 3

Question 1: What does it mean to be a successful student in English is a very broad subject, encompassing the academic disciplines of literature and language; technical and contextual knowledge and understanding; and a number of transferable skills. Because of this, defining success in English is complex and, historically, students aptitude in the subject has been determined by a best-fit approach, which may ignore this complexity. Successful students in English will develop a love of reading, will read broadly and deeply for meaning, and will be familiar with a range of text types, genres and literary contexts. Success in English results in students becoming literate and also becoming increasingly sophisticated in their study of language and literature. Underpinning the study of language and the study of literature are three broad skills: reading, writing and oracy (speaking and listening). Success in these skills is iterative, involving both technical and higher-order skills. Becoming good at English means becoming a better communicator making increasingly sophisticated arguments being critically aware analysing and seeing texts through different schools of thought developing knowledge of the literary canon in its widest sense using language, punctuation and grammar with greater accuracy and creativity. Since literacy and oracy are central to achievement across the curriculum, success in English is often regarded as the key to success in other academic disciplines. The English department often have a lead role in promoting literacy across the school. Students need to combine technical accuracy with creative expression. They need to gain confidence in adapting their reading, writing and oracy skills to use them in a range of contexts and for a variety of purposes. Successful writers will use a range of punctuation, grammar, syntax and vocabulary to express meaning for a variety of audiences and purposes. 4

Question 2: What is the purpose of assessment in The key purpose of assessment should be to help students understand where they are in their learning - supporting them to know what they are secure with in terms of their knowledge, understanding and skills and helping them identify areas to develop. However, assessment can also: allow learners to reflect on learning over time be used to find out where students are before they start something new help teachers reflect on their pedagogy help teachers to develop a better understanding of the student as a learner help to identify learning issues to support the planning of strategic interventions provide a basis for a meaningful dialogue with students, parents/carers and other stakeholders, such as school leaders, governors and Ofsted, about students progress. Ultimately, because assessment must be linked to the curriculum, the core purpose of assessment in English must relate to what it means to be a successful student of English. English teaching should help students become more literate, more confident communicators, and better at the academic and disciplinary study of language and literature and assessments should help to monitor this development. Assessment can be used formatively to help students improve their writing, by correcting spelling, punctuation and grammar errors, challenging students choices in use of words and syntax, and extending students vocabulary. In English, we also assess for knowledge and understanding. This includes understanding narrative, plot and character, literary devices, contextual understanding, and the correct use of spelling, punctuation and grammar. As is the case with every subject, assessment in English is inextricably linked to teachers understanding of what their subject means, what they choose to teach and how. What we choose to assess, and when, shows us what we think is important about our subject. Formative assessment can provide helpful insights into learning and take a range of forms, for example: from informal discussions, to the use of hinge questions in lessons, to assessing extended tasks that can be used to tease out more complex and deeper levels of understanding. Effective formative assessment should address the totality of a student s performance, not just the easily measurable, and is integral to everyday teaching. In developing formative assessment, it is vital to consider what information the assessment is aiming to collect. Effective formative assessment helps to identify strengths and areas for development and can also help to demonstrate progress over time. Formative assessment of reading takes different forms over time; from helping students to decode letters, words and sentences, to making increasingly complex arguments about texts, and comprehending gradually more diverse and difficult texts in a range of contexts. At every stage of secondary education, these can be useful assessments and one piece of evidence can often be used to evidence multiple skills. Assessment information is needed for a variety of stakeholders and purposes but, fundamentally, assessment should be focused on the student and for the student. It should: allow students to know where they are in their learning help to inform future teaching and learning activities help to identify specific learning issues and to provide additional support/intervention where needed track and monitor students progress and to identify underachievement. 5

Question 3: What does progress look like in Because of the broad nature of English, progress is unlikely to follow a linear pattern. It is quite possible to make progress in one skill, but not in another. Even within one discrete skill, progress in English is not always accumulative. For example, it is quite possible for a student to use a semi-colon correctly, but not use a colon correctly. Likewise, students may progress more quickly in their critical appreciation of one type of text than another. It is important that subject teachers understand the progress students are making in the specific skills of English. An aggregated measure of progress may be useful for whole-school accountability but will do little to help an individual become better at English. It should not be assumed that a student is failing to make progress in a particular skill if their performance is uneven. In order to make meaningful judgements about progress, it is important to look at performance over an extended period of time and in a range of contexts. There are some broad indicators of progress that teachers look for, including more interesting and sophisticated arguments, attitude towards to the subject, making links and connections, being more critical, greater depth and an increasingly nuanced understanding of genre, audience and purpose. It can be helpful to consider: depth sophistication strategic intent across the skills of reading, writing and oracy. 6

Question 4: How can progress be assessed most effectively in Common to all assessments is the requirement that students produce evidence (which may be written, verbal, visual, etc.) from which a teacher is able to make inferences about what they can or cannot do, against the criteria of the curriculum. Assessments are likely to focus on both application of skills and understanding of literary knowledge, with both achieving different purposes. For example, assessment may evaluate the success with which a student constructs a sentence, or may test students knowledge of a novel s plot. Consideration should be given to the role of both formative and summative assessment judgements. Formative judgements may be made on a daily basis, several times during a lesson. When considering progress, summative assessment judgements should be made at appropriate intervals, with enough time between each to be meaningful. Effective assessment in English will evaluate whether a student can do something in one context and how confident a teacher is that they could achieve this in different contexts. To do this, assessments are likely to be a spiral, with the same skills being revisited at different points in the lesson, term, year or course. Good assessment should focus on the key construct that is being taught; although of course more than one construct may be taught and assessed at the same time. So, for example, one assessment may evaluate students understanding of a character, but also their use of an essay paragraph structure (e.g. PEA - point, evidence, analysis; or EPEE - evidence, point, explanation, evaluation). Examples of effective assessment practice include: modelling e.g. shared reading and writing as a class, exposing the thinking behind choice of vocabulary sharing work to assess e.g. giving students access to exemplar answers at different grades, giving feedback in groups of four with students having to workout whose feedback is whose peer assessment e.g. asking students to look for certain types of word, punctuation, etc in their peers work self-assessment e.g. asking students to evaluate their work against clearly explained success criteria dialogue e.g. monitoring understanding through class or pair discussions socratic questioning e.g. in pairs, one student is only allowed to ask questions, the other to provide answers multiple-choice questions e.g. which of these sentences is best described as a metaphor? essay questions e.g. adapted from sample GCSE papers visual cues e.g. evaluating figurative language from a pictorial representation of the same text. Copyright 2017 SSAT (The Schools Network), Association of School and College Leaders, National Foundation for Educational Research ISBN: 978-1-911039-46-4 7