2015-2016 Report Card for Grandview Heights Schools City School District DISTRICT GRADE Coming in 2018 Achievement The Achievement component represents the number of students who passed the state tests and how well they performed on them. COMPONENT GRADE B Progress The Progress component looks closely at the growth that all students are making based on their past performances. COMPONENT GRADE C Performance Index 84.7%...... Indicators Met 92.9%...... B A Value-Added Overall... Gifted... Students with Disabilities... Lowest 20% in Achievement... C C D C Gap Closing The Gap Closing component shows how well schools are meeting the performance expectations for our most vulnerable populations of students in English language arts, math and graduation. COMPONENT GRADE D Graduation Rate The Graduation Rate component looks at the percent of students who are successfully finishing high school with a diploma in four or five years. COMPONENT GRADE A Annual Measurable Objectives 66.7%... D... Graduation Rates 95.3% of students graduated in 4 years... 98.8% of students graduated in 5 years... A A K-3 Literacy The K-3 Literacy component looks at how successful the school is at getting struggling readers on track to proficiency in third grade and beyond. COMPONENT GRADE A Prepared for Success Whether training in a technical field or preparing for work or college, the Prepared for Success component looks at how well prepared Ohio s students are for all future opportunities. COMPONENT GRADE C K-3 Literacy Improvement 96.0%... A... Page 1 of 31
Achievement The Achievement component represents the number of students who passed the state tests and how well they performed on them. COMPONENT GRADE B GRADE 20 0 B Performance Index 40 60 80 100 84.7% 101.7 of a possible 120.0 Performance Index The Performance Index measures the test results of every student, not just those who score proficient or higher. There are six levels on the index and districts receive points for every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the more the points awarded in the district's index. This rewards schools and districts for improving the performance of all students, regardless of achievement level. Achievement Level Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested Pct of Students Points for this Level 1.6 32.8 29.7 x x x 1.3 1.2 1.1 = = = 19.5 x 1.0 = 10.4 x 0.6 = 5.9 x 0.3 = 0.0 x 0.0 = Points Received 2.1 39.4 32.7 19.5 6.2 1.8 0.0 101.7 120 100 80 60 Performance Index Trend 107.3 108.2 109.4 103.5 101.7 A = 90.0-10 B = 80.0-89.9% C = 70.0-79.9% D = 50.0-69.9% F = 0.0-49.9% 1.6 10.4 5.9 19.5 29.7 32.8 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Limited Basic Untested 40 20 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Untested Limited Basic Proficient Accelerated Advanced Advanced Plus Page 2 of 31
GRADE A Indicators Met Indicators Met measures the percent of students who have passed state tests. It also includes the gifted indicator. Test results are reported for each student in a grade and subject. Indicators Met % 92.9% 26 out of 28 40 60 A = B = C = D = F = 90.0-10 80.0-89.9% 70.0-79.9% 50.0-69.9% 0.0-49.9% 20 0 80 100 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 High School English Language Arts 92.2% English Language Arts 79.5% Mathematics 95.7% 3rd Grade Mathematics 92.2% 6th Grade Mathematics 80.2% Reading 98.9% English Language Arts 75.3% Social Studies 87.7% OGT, 11th Graders Science 96.7% 4th Grade Mathematics 82.4% English Language Arts 82.1% Social Studies 95.7% 7th Grade Social Studies 91.7% Mathematics 85.0% Writing 98.9% English Language Arts 84.3% English Language Arts 74.5% Algebra I 91.2% 5th Grade Mathematics 78.1% 8th Grade Mathematics 75.0% Biology English I NC 82.4% Science 84.3% Science 93.5% HS English II 79.8% Geometry 65.6% GIFTED INDICATOR Government 93.3% History 92.2% Page 3 of 31
Achievement Levels by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade 3rd Grade 3rd Grade 95% 92.2% 92.2% 90% 88.6% 85% 82.1% 80% 75% 70% 65.8% 65% 60% 54.9% 55% 50% Reading Mathematics District Similar Districts State Average 100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Reading Mathematics 4th Grade 4th Grade 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 91.6% 95.0% 91.7% 83.2% 82.4% 75.3% 75.8% 69.2% 57.5% Reading Mathematics Social Studies 100% 96% 92% 88% 84% 80% 76% 72% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 District Similar Districts State Average Reading Mathematics Social Studies 5th Grade 5th Grade 92% 88% 84% 80% 76% 72% 68% 64% 60% 88.5% 84.3% 83.2% 84.6% 84.3% 78.1% 67.5% 60.2% 62.4% Reading Mathematics Science 100% 96% 92% 88% 84% 80% 76% 72% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 District Similar Districts State Average Reading Mathematics Science Page 4 of 31
6th Grade 6th Grade 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 87.7% 86.2% 83.0% 79.5% 79.7% 80.2% 61.2% 54.0% 56.7% Reading Mathematics Social Studies 100% 96% 92% 88% 84% 80% 76% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 District Similar Districts State Average Reading Mathematics Social Studies 7th Grade 7th Grade 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 82.1% 80.4% Reading 53.6% 85.0% 82.5% 55.3% Mathematics 100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% 82% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 District Similar Districts State Average Reading Mathematics 8th Grade 8th Grade 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 93.5% 88.7% 82.2% 74.5% 74.2% 75.0% 64.9% 52.7% 47.5% Reading Mathematics Science 100% 96% 92% 88% 84% 80% 76% 72% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 District Similar Districts State Average Reading Mathematics Science 11th Grade Cumulative OGT 11th Grade Cumulative OGT Page 5 of 31
98.7% 98.4% 100% 98.9% 98.9% 96.7% 97.9% 98% 97.7% 96.7% 96% 95.7% 95.7% 94% 92.1% 92% 90% 89.6% 88.0% 88% 87.5% 86% 84% 83.3% 82% Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science District Similar Districts State Average 100% 99% 98% 97% 96% 95% 94% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science Page 6 of 31
Gifted Students The Gifted Students data and Indicator highlight the opportunities for and performance of gifted students. The dashboard answers several questions: How many students are identified as gifted and in what categories? How many of those students are receiving gifted services? How well are those gifted students performing? The Gifted Indicator measures whether opportunity and performance expectations are being met for gifted students. INDICATOR Not Met The Gifted Indicator is derived from three components: Gifted Value Added grade, the Performance Index for gifted students, and a Gifted Inputs score. Value Added Grade: Enrollment: Value Added Met? Performance Index: Performance Index Met?: Not Met C 1,043 Met Gifted Value Added Districts must earn a Gifted Value Added grade of C or better to meet the Gifted Value Added component. A grade of "NR" results in Not Met if the district has an ADM of 600 or more. Gifted Performance Index 115.551 Overview Districts with at least 10 unique students in the Gifted Performance Index calculation must score 116.0 or better to meet the Gifted Performance Index component. Gifted Inputs 20 0 40 60 80 100 96.3% 115.551 of a possible 120.0 A = 90.0-10 B = 80.0-89.9% C = 70.0-79.9% D =50.0-69.9% F = 0.0-49.9% Performance Index The Performance Index calculation for gifted students. Only tests taken by students identified as gifted in that subject (e.g. gifted in Math and taking the Math test), or taken by students identified with Super Cognitive abilities regardless of test subject are included. Achievement Level Pct of Students Points for this Level Points Received Advanced Plus 5.5 x 1.3 = 7.2 Advanced 64.1 x 1.2 = 76.9 Accelerated 19.6 x 1.1 = 21.6 Proficient 8.6 x 1.0 = 8.6 Basic 2.2 x 0.6 = 1.3 Limited 0.0 x 0.3 = 0.0 Untested 0.0 x 0.0 = 0.0 115.551 Total Points: Gifted Inputs Met?: 90.0 Met Points are earned based on identification and services provided to gifted students. Districts must earn at least 60 points out of a possible 100 to meet the Gifted Inputs component. 8.6 2.2 5.5 INDICATOR Not Met Gifted Indicator Final Result The Gifted Indicator is Met if none of the three components are Not Met. Gifted Inputs alone cannot determine the Gifted Indicator, however; if both the Value Added and Performance Index components are NC, then the Gifted Indicator is also NC. 19.6 64.1 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Limited Basic Untested Page 7 of 31
Gifted Indicator The Gifted Inputs calculation assigns points based on the percentage of students identified and served in eight categories (factors). The points earned for each category are totaled to determine the final Met/Not Met determination for the Gifted Input component. Reading, Math, Science, Social Studies, and Superior Cognitive Abilities K-3 4-8 9-12 39.2% 47.0% 47.2% 0.5% 0.8% 60.8% 52.5% 51.9% Visual/Performing Arts and Creative Thinking K-3 4-8 9-12 10 10 97.9% 2.1% Disadvantaged Students Minority Students 81.2% 67.4% 18.8% 32.6% Receiving Gifted Services Identified as Gifted, but not receiving services Not Identified as Gifted Page 8 of 31
Identification and Services These charts show the percentage of enrolled students that are identified as gifted and that are receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 32.0% 28.0% 24.0% 2 16.0% 12.0% 8.0% 4.0% 28.6% 28.6% 24.5% 24.2% 20.4% 19.2% 12.8% 12.7% 11.9% 10.9% 0.6% Creative Thinking Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive 35.0% 3 25.0% 2 15.0% 1 5.0% 27.3% 27.3% 33.4% 33.4% 2.9% 1.3% Math Reading Superior Cognitive Identified Receiving Services Identified Receiving Services Grades 4-8 Grades 9-12 35.0% 3 25.0% 2 15.0% 1 5.0% 33.0% 33.0% 30.1% 30.1% 27.3% 27.1% 12.4% 10.6% 10.6% 11.2% Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive 32.0% 28.0% 24.0% 2 16.0% 12.0% 8.0% 4.0% 28.7% 28.3% 27.4% 23.5% 20.1% 20.1% 17.9% 17.2% 17.9% 17.5% 2.1% Creative Thinking Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Identified Receiving Services Identified Receiving Services Page 9 of 31
Identified and Receiving Services These charts show, of the students identified as gifted, the percentage of students receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 10 98.8% 99.7% 94.3% 98.9% 91.9% 10 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 4 44.4% 2 2 Creative Thinking Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Math Reading Superior Cognitive Grades 4-8 Grades 9-12 10 8 99.1% 10 10 10 90.5% 10 8 96.4% 98.2% 85.8% 98.3% 10 6 6 4 4 2 2 Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Creative Thinking Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Page 10 of 31
Screening Acceleration This chart shows the percentage of students screened for gifted abilities this school year. 80% 70% 60% 72.2% 72.2% Number of Subject Accelerated Students: 38 50% 40% 30% 20% 41.4% 16.5% Number of Whole-Grade Accelerated Students: 0 10% 0% Reading Math Social Studies Science Superior Cognitive Page 11 of 31
Progress The Progress component looks closely at the growth that all students are making based on their past performances. COMPONENT GRADE C GRADE C GRADE C GRADE C GRADE D Overall This measures the progress for all students in math, ELA, science and social studies using tests in grades 4-8 and some end-of-course exams. Gifted Students This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading, math, science, social studies and/or superior cognitive ability. Students in the Lowest 20% in Achievement This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 20% statewide in reading, math, science or social studies achievement. Students with Disabilities This measures the progress for students with disabilities. Test Grade Metrics Progress Score High School Test Grade All Grades 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade English I English II Progress Details These tables show the Progress scores by test grade and subject for students in grades 4-8 and some end-of-course tests, and includes up to three years of data as available. English Language Arts 3.97 1.86 Test Grade Metrics Progress Score High School Progress Score Mathematics Social Studies Science 1.54-5.08 2.24-2.16-1.36-5.86-0.56-4.45-5.59 2.92-0.01 2.24 1.32-3.94-1.41-1.52 2.26 Algebra I Geometry 4.88 4.24 GRADE NR High Mobility For districts and schools with a mobility rate of 25% or higher, this measures the progress of a subset of students that have been in the district for at least two years. This measure will not be included in the Progress component grade. Although Progress scores are not assigned letter grades at this level of detail, the grading scale applied at the Overall (All Students, All Tests) level is: A = 2.00 and up B = 1.00 to 1.99 C = -1.00 to 0.99 D = -2.00 to -1.01 F = below -2.00 Page 12 of 31
Progress vs. Performance Index This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's Performance Index results (horizontal axis) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical axis). The size of the bubble represents the size of the student subgroup. A B G r C Overall Students w/ Disabilities Lowest 20% Gifted High School Highly Mobile D F 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Performance Index Page 13 of 31
Gap Closing The Gap Closing component shows how well schools are meeting the performance expectations for our most vulnerable populations of students in English language arts, math and graduation. COMPONENT GRADE D GRADE D Annual Measurable Objectives Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of student groups to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achieves that goal in reading, math and graduation and emphasize any achievement gaps that exist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels. English Language Arts Math Graduation Rate AMO Points 40 60 82.2 83.1 20 0 80 100 95.3 80.9 81.6 67 66.7% A = 90.0-10 B = 80.0-89.9% C = 70.0-79.9% D = 60.0-69.9% F = 0.0-59.9% 63.2 37.7 63.3 39.3 94.8 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 White Econ Disadvantage All Students Students w/ Disabilities White All Students Econ Disadvantage Students w/ Disabilities 0 20 40 60 80 100 All Students White The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 2016 AMO for ELA is 74.2%, for Math is 68.5%, and for Graduation Rate is 82.8%. Subgroups with fewer than 30 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs. Page 14 of 31
Graduation Rate The Graduation Rate component looks at the percent of students who are successfully finishing high school with a diploma in four or five years. COMPONENT GRADE A 4-Year Graduation Rate The 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2015 who graduated within four years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 2012 and graduated by 2015. 4-Year Rate 5-Year Rate GRADE A 95.3% A = 93.0-10 B = 89.0-92.9% C = 84.0-88.9% D = 79.0-83.9% F = 0.0-78.9% 20 0 40 60 80 100 100 80 60 95.3 96.3 83.0 100 80 60 98.8 97.6 84.9 5-Year Graduation Rate The 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2014 who graduated within five years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 2011 and graduated by 2015. GRADE A 98.8% A = 95.0-10 B = 90.0-94.9% C = 85.0-89.9% D = 80.0-84.9% F = 0.0-79.9% 20 0 40 60 80 100 40 20 0 District State Average Similar Districts 40 20 0 District State Average Similar Districts Page 15 of 31
Graduation Rate Trend 100% 99% 98.8% 98.8% 98.8% 98% 97% 96.8% 96% 95% 95.3% 94% 93% 92.6% 92% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 4-Year 5-Year Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because the necessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year. Page 16 of 31
K-3 Literacy The K-3 Literacy component looks at how successful the school is at getting struggling readers on track to proficiency in third grade and beyond. COMPONENT GRADE A GRADE In Your District... Details of Measure A K-3 Literacy Improvement < 10 NC kindergarten students were not on-track last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 1st grade. Not On-Track at Point A Kindergarten Reading Diagnostic, School Year 2014-2015 < 10 to Improving to On-Track at Point B 1st Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year 2015-2016 < 10 20 0 40 60 80 100 < 10 NC first grade students were not on-track last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 2nd grade. 1st Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year 2014-2015 2nd Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year 2014-2015 < 10 to < 10 to 2nd Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year 2015-2016 3rd Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year 2015-2016 < 10 < 10 96.0% 24 out of 25 A = 81.4-10 B = 62.6-81.3% C = 43.8-62.5% D = 25.0-43.7% F = 0.0-24.9% < 10 NC < 10 second grade students were not ontrack last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 3rd grade. third grade students were not on-track this year. 3rd Grade Reading Diagnostic, School Year 2015-2016 < 10 to 3rd Grade Reading OST, School Year 2015-2016 Deduction for 3rd graders who did not pass OST and were not on a Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan < 10 NC Totals 25 24 of those students reached proficiency NC on the 3rd grade OAA. Page 17 of 31
Percentage On-Track in Reading Diagnostic Third Grade Reading Guarantee Kindergarten Diagnostic First Grade Diagnostic Second Grade Diagnostic 92.9% 98.7% 97.5% 7.1% 1.3% 2.5% On- Track Not On-Track Ohio's Third Grade Reading Guarantee ensures that students are successful in reading before moving on to fourth grade. Schools must provide supports for struggling readers in early grades. If a child appears to be falling behind in reading, the school will immediately start a Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan. The program ensures that every struggling reader gets the support he or she needs to learn and achieve. Students have multiple opportunities to meet promotion requirements including meeting a minimum promotion score on the reading portion of the state's third grade English language arts test given twice during the school year. Students have an additional opportunity to take the state assessment in the summer, as well as a district-determined alternative assessment. Third Grade Diagnostic 10 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% This chart shows the overall percentage of students that were on-track/not-on-track for each grade level reading diagnostic in 2015-2016. The Parent Roadmap is available to help parents understand how the Third Grade How Reading many third Guarantee graders applies met the to Third your Grade child. Reading Guarantee requirements for promotion to 4th grade? How many third graders scored proficient on the state Reading test? 100.0 % 92.2% Page 18 of 31
Prepared for Success Whether training in a technical field or preparing for work or college, the Prepared for Success component looks at how well prepared Ohio s students are for all future opportunities. COMPONENT GRADE C COMPONENT GRADE C 40% 60% 20% 80% 0% 100% Number of students that earned a remediation free score on all parts of the ACT or SAT, earned an honors diploma, and/or earned an industryrecognized credential Number of Students Point Value Points Earne d 101 1 101.0 How Prepared were Your 2014 and 2015 Graduating Classes? ACT: Participation ACT: Remediation Free SAT: Participation SAT: Remediation Free 29.5% 41.0% 55.4% 76.5% 61.2% A = B = C = D = F = 85.0% - 10 65.0% - 84.9% 34.0% - 64.9% 15.0% - 33.9% - 14.9% The number of "bonus" students that count an additional 0.3 bonus points each, because they did the above and also earned a 3 or higher on at least one AP exam; earned a 4 or higher on at least one IB exam; and/or earned at least three college credits before leaving high school 2 0.3 0.6 Total Points: 101.6 Honors Diploma Industry-Recognized Credential Advanced Placement: Participation 37.3% 62.0% Graduation Cohort: 166 Percentage: 61.2% AP: Exam Score of 3 or Better 0.6% Dual Enrollment Credit 0.6% International Baccalaureate IB: Exam Score of 4 or Better 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Note: These data represent students in the 4-year and 5-year graduation rates, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2011 and 2012. Page 19 of 31
How Prepared were Your 2014 and 2015 Graduating Classes? Districts and schools have long-term impacts on student outcomes. The Prepared for Success component provides information on how schools prepare students for different pathways of college and career success. It also provides insights on how those students do once they leave high school. What happens beyond the diploma is an important indicator of how well schools are preparing students. The University System of Ohio provides district reports on enrollment and remediation of high school graduates attending in-state, public colleges and universities. What Percentage of the 2013 Graduating Class Entered College within Two Years? 65.1 % 65.1% 34.9% What Percentage of the 2009 Graduating Class Graduated from College within Six Years of Leaving High School? 48.5 % 51.5% 48.5% Note: These data represent students in the 4-year and 5-year graduation rates, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2011 and 2012. Page 20 of 31
Superintendent: Andrew K. Culp Address: 1587 W 3rd Ave Columbus OH 43212-2825 Directory information current as of the 2015-2016 Report Card publication date Phone: (614) 481-3600 County: Career Tech Planning District: Franklin Columbus City CTPD Your District's Students Average Daily Enrollment: 1,047 Number of Limited English Proficiency Students Excluded from Accountability Calculations: -- Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficiency Migrant Enrollment by Subgroup Enrollment # Enrollment % NC NC 12 22 41 961 108 97 NC NC 1.2% 2.1% 3.9% 91.8% 10.3% 9.2% NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group State and federal law require an annual assessment of Limited English Proficient (LEP) students to measure their English language proficiency. The Ohio English Language Proficiency Assessment (OELPA) is the assessment used in Ohio to gauge LEP students' growth in learning English. For information about your district's OELPA results, see the Department of Education's web site at http://education.ohio.gov. 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% American Indian or Alaska... 1.2% 2.1% 3.9% 91.8% Asian or Pacific Islander 10.3% 9.2% Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Migrant Economic Disadvantage Limited English Proficiency Enrollments of less than 10 students are not shown. Page 21 of 31
Attendance Chronic Absenteeism Rate: 6.1% Attendance Rate All Students 95.7% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native NC Asian or Pacific Islander NC Black, Non-Hispanic 96.4% Hispanic 96.5% Multiracial 95.2% White, Non-Hispanic 95.7% Students with Disabilities 95.9% Economic Disadvantage 94.1% Limited English Proficiency NC Migrant NC Male 95.8% Female 95.6% NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 95.7% 96.4%96.5%95.2%95.7%95.9% 94.1% All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Students with Disabilities Asian or Pacific Islander Economic Disadvantage Attendance Rate is not shown if enrollment is less than 10. Page 22 of 31
Mobility Rates by Subgroup District Mobility % All Students 4.4% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native NC Asian or Pacific Islander 9.1% Black, Non-Hispanic 29.4% Hispanic 4.3% Multiracial 2.3% White, Non-Hispanic 4.0% Students with Disabilities 10.8% Economically Disadvantaged 14.7% Limited English Proficiency 1 Migrant NC 32% 28% 24% 20% 16% 12% 8% 4% 0% 4.4% 29.4% 14.7% 10.8% 1 9.1% 4.3% 4.0% 2.3% NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Students with Disabilities Migrant Asian or Pacific Islander Economic Disadvantage This chart shows the percentage of students who, because they moved into or out of the district, did not spend a majority of the school year within the district. Page 23 of 31
Your District's Teachers Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor's Degree Percentage of teachers with at least a Master's Degree Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes taught by properly certified teachers Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught by teachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure All Schools in the District 100.0 82.5 1.7 98.3 0 High Poverty Schools Low Poverty Schools 0.0 100.0 0.0 82.3 -- 1.7 -- 98.3 -- 0 A district's high poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of the district's economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile, or in neither quartile. School Counselors School Nurses School Psychologists Interpreters Educators in your District Library or Media Specialists Audiologist Physical/Occupational Therapist Social Worker General Education Teachers Career-Technical Teachers Special Education Teachers Teacher Aides Gifted Intervention Specialists Fine Arts Teachers Music Teachers Physical Education Teachers ELL Specialists Adaptive Physical Education Teachers Speech Language Pathologists NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group Per 1000 # Students 5.0 4.8 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 59.0 0.0 12.5 2.0 4.0 4.5 2.0 0.0 56.3 0.0 11.9 1.8 1.7 1.9 3.8 4.3 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.4 State Avg per 1000 Students 2.3 1.1 1.2 0.2 1.4 0.0 0.8 0.2 46.4 2.3 10.6 7.0 0.6 3.0 2.5 2.9 0.3 0.0 1.4 Your District's Principals Percentage of principals with at least a Bachelor's Degree 10 Percentage of principals with at least a Master's Degree 10 Attendance Rate 95.0% Average Salary $73,128 Average Years of Experience 13 Lead or Senior Teachers 6.0 Page 24 of 31
Teacher Evaluations Principal Evaluations 19.3% 33.3% 9.6% 71.1% 66.7% Accomplished Skilled Developing Ineffective Not Complete Accomplished Skilled Developing Ineffective Not Complete Page 25 of 31
Wellness and Physical Education The extent to which students are successful in meeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's physical education standards Compliance with the federal requirement for implementing a local wellness policy Elected to administer BMI screening Participation in Physical Activity Pilot Program Moderate Success School Choice Options: Place of Enrollment for Students Residing in the District The School Choice Options data is a set of nine counts describing the place of enrollment for students residing in the school district, captured as a snapshot of a single day in the school year. Web links provide further information about certain options. Districts and STEM Schools 1,042 students enrolled in the district where they lived 12 students enrolled in another public district through Open Enrollment 5 students enrolled in another public district by means other than Open Enrollment Community Schools 5 students enrolled in an online community school 12 students enrolled in a sitebased community school 1 students enrolled in a Dropout Prevention and Recovery Program (online or site-based)* Non-Public Schools* 0 students participated in the EdChoice Scholarship or Cleveland Scholarship Program 0 students participated in the EdChoice Expansion Program 3 students participated in the Ohio Autism Scholarship or Jon Peterson Special Needs Scholarship Program Fine Arts Courses Offered No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. No Fine Arts Courses are offered by this district. *Students included in Dropout Prevention and Recovery Program counts are also included in either the online or site-based community school counts. *ODE does not collect and cannot report information on district residents who are nonvoucher students attending a non-public school. Page 26 of 31
Financial Data These measures answer several questions about spending and performance. How much is spent on Classroom instruction? How much, on average, is spent on each student? What is the source of the revenue? How do these measures compare to other districts and schools? Comparison Group: Enrollment between 1000 and 2499 Classroom Spending Data Spending per Pupil Data District State What percent of funds are spent on classroom instruction? 74.2% How does this district rank in comparison to other districts of similar size? 3 out of 276 A rank of 1 indicates the highest percent spent on classroom instruction. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Operating Spending per Pupil $13,963 $8,711 Classroom Instruction $10,360 $5,845 Non-Classroom Spending $3,603 $2,866 District District Comparison Group State 25.8% 33.2% 32.9% State 74.2% 66.8% 67.1% $4,000 $8,000 $12,000 $16,000 Classroom Instruction Non-Classroom Instruction Grandview Heights Schools City IS NOT among the 20% of public districts with the lowest operating expenditures per pupil Grandview Heights Schools City IS among the 20% of public districts with the highest academic performance index scores. Note: District financial data do not include data associated with community schools that are sponsored by the school district. Page 27 of 31
Spending and Performance This measure answers the question what is the relationship of average spending per student to performance, and how does that compare to similar districts and schools? Similar Districts Comparison Group All Districts 120.0 120.0 120.0 110.0 110.0 110.0 P e P e P e 100.0 100.0 100.0 90.0 90.0 90.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 60.0 $0 $4,000 $8,000 $12,000 $16,000 $20,000 $24,000 $28,000 $32,000 60.0 $0 $4,000 $8,000 $12,000 $16,000 $20,000 $24,000 $28,000 $32,000 60.0 $0 $4,000 $8,000 $12,000 $16,000 $20,000 $24,000 $28,000 $32,000 Spending per Pupil Spending per Pupil Spending per Pupil Page 28 of 31
Source of Revenue Source of Funds District State Total Local State Federal Other Non-Tax Total $13,312,994 69.9% $3,653,203 19.2% $431,477 2.3% $1,639,418 8.6% $19,037,092 10 $8,636,050,030 39.6% $9,988,118,791 45.8% $1,656,488,620 7.6% $1,546,639,712 7.1% $21,827,297,153 10 District State 46% 19% 2% 9% 7% 70% 8% 40% Local Federal State Other Non-Tax Local State Federal Other Non-Tax Page 29 of 31
Superintendent: Address: Andrew K. Culp 1587 W 3rd Ave Columbus OH 43212-2825 Phone: County: (614) 481-3600 Franklin Your District's Schools School Achievement Progress Gap Closing Graduation Rate K-3 Literacy Prepared for Success Edison Intermediate B C D A A C Grandview Heights High School B C D A A C Larson Middle School B C D A A C Stevenson Elementary B C D A A C Page 30 of 31
No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. Page 31 of 31