Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Similar documents
Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Shelters Elementary School

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Educational Attainment

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

John F. Kennedy Middle School

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

African American Male Achievement Update

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Best Colleges Main Survey

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Transportation Equity Analysis

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Bellehaven Elementary

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

46 Children s Defense Fund

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

PEIMS Submission 1 list

State of New Jersey

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Review of Student Assessment Data

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

University of Arizona

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

Kahului Elementary School

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS

12-month Enrollment

Bellevue University Admission Application

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School


College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Raw Data Files Instructions

World s Best Workforce Plan

Cuero Independent School District

El Toro Elementary School

Hokulani Elementary School

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

St. John Fisher College Rochester, NY

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Information Packet. Home Education ELC West Amelia Street Orlando, FL (407) FAX: (407)

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Organization Profile

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

LIM College New York, NY

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Transcription:

213-214 Report Card for Grandview Heights City School District DISTRICT Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question How well did students do on the state test? Progress This is your district s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. Did the students get a year s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less? Performance Index Value-Added 91.1%... A Overall...... Indicators Met Gifted... 1.%... A Students with Disabilities...... Lowest 2% in Achievement... A B C NR Gap Closing This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, ethnicity, or disability? Graduation Rate This grade answers the question How many ninth graders graduate in four years or five years? Annual Measurable Objectives 84.9%... B... Graduation Rates 98.8% of students graduated in 4 years... 96.8% of students graduated in 5 years... A A K-3 Literacy This grade answers the question Are more students learning to read in kindergarten through third grade? Prepared for Success This grade answers the question Are students who graduate from your district ready for college or a career? There are many ways to show that graduates are prepared. K-3 Literacy 46.7% - Provisional Data A number of districts have identified reporting errors with their submitted data which will affect the grades for all districts. This grade will be released as soon as it is determined to be accurate. Page 1 of 23

Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question How well did students do on the state test? A Performance Index 2 4 6 8 1 Performance Index The Performance Index measures the test results of every student, not just those who score proficient or higher. There are six levels on the index and districts receive points for every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the more the points awarded in the district's index. This rewards schools and districts for improving performance. Achievement Level Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested Pct of Students Points for this Level 1.6 41.6 3.5 x x x 1.3 1.2 1.1 = = = 21.2 x 1. = 3.6 x.6 = 1.5 x.3 =. x. = Points Received 2.1 49.9 33.5 21.2 2.2.4. 19.4 12 1 8 6 Performance Index Trend 14.7 16.2 17.3 18.2 19.4 91.1% 19.4 of a possible 12. A = 9. - 1.% B = 8. - 89.9% C = 7. - 79.9% D = 5. - 69.9% F =. - 49.9% 21.2 3.6 1.5 1.6 41.6 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Limited Basic Untested 4 2 21 211 212 213 214 3.5 Untested Limited Basic Proficient Accelerated Advanced Advanced Plus Page 2 of 23

A Indicators Met Indicators Met measures the percent of students who have passed state tests. Test results are reported for each student in a grade and subject. At least 8 percent of students must pass to get credit for the indicator. Indicators Met % 1.% 24 out of 24 4 6 A = B = C = D = F = 9. - 1.% 8. - 89.9% 7. - 79.9% 5. - 69.9%. - 49.9% 2 8 1 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Ohio Graduation Test 93.8% 93.6% 93.1% 3rd Grade 6th Grade 97.5% 96.8% 97.2% 92.% 91.9% OGT, 1th Graders Science 93.1% 4th Grade 7th Grade 97.3% 97.4% Social Studies 98.6% 91.7% 94.5% Writing 98.6% 5th Grade 92.9% 8th Grade 97.7% 1.% Science 91.8% Science 94.2% 98.8% OGT, 11th Graders Science 98.8% Social Studies 98.8% Writing 98.8% Page 3 of 23

Achievement Levels by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade 3rd Grade 3rd Grade 1% 84% 8% 76% 97.5% 95.% 93.8% 94.4% 81.% 79.7% 1% 98% 94% 9% 86% 84% 21 211 212 213 214 District Similar Districts State Average 4th Grade 4th Grade 1% 84% 8% 76% 97.3% 96.6% 85.7% 93.2% 92.% 78.3% 1% 98% 94% 9% 86% 84% 82% 21 211 212 213 214 District Similar Districts State Average 5th Grade 5th Grade 92.9% 91.7% 91.8% 9.1% 88.4% 87.8% 84% 8% 76% 71.9% 72% 69.1% 68% 67.5% 64% Science District Similar Districts State Average 1% 84% 8% 76% 21 211 212 213 214 Science Page 4 of 23

6th Grade 6th Grade 1% 84% 8% 76% 96.8% 95.% 84.1% 93.6% 93.4% 76.4% 1% 98% 94% 9% 86% 21 211 212 213 214 District Similar Districts State Average 7th Grade 7th Grade 1% 97.4% 84% 8% 76% 72% 95.9% 83.5% 91.9% 91.2% 72.9% 1% 98% 94% 9% 86% 84% 21 211 212 213 214 District Similar Districts State Average 8th Grade 8th Grade 1% 97.7% 96.6% 95% 94.5% 94.6% 94.2% 9% 86.7% 89.2% 85% 8% 79.8% 75% 7% 67.6% 65% Science District Similar Districts State Average 1% 98% 94% 9% 86% 21 211 212 213 214 Science Page 5 of 23

1th Grade OGT 97.1% 1% 98.6% 98.6% 97.2% 97.% 95.3% 95.3% 93.9% 93.1% 93.1% 88.5% 87.2% 84% 81.6% 82.2% 8% 76.7% 76% Writing Social Studies Science District Similar Districts State Average 1% 98% 94% 9% 1th Grade OGT 21 211 212 213 214 Writing Social Studies Science 11th Grade Cumulative OGT 12% 98.9% 98.8% 97.9% 1.% 1% 98.8% 98.8% 98.8% 98.8% 98.3% 98% 97.3% 94% 93.% 91.9% 9% 89.6% 88.8% 86% 85.8% 84% Writing Social Studies Science District Similar Districts State Average 1% 99% 98% 97% 95% 94% 11th Grade Cumulative OGT 21 211 212 213 214 Writing Social Studies Science Page 6 of 23

Gifted Students The Gifted Students data and Indicator highlight the opportunities for and performance of gifted students. The dashboard answers several questions: How many students are identified as gifted and in what categories? How many of those students are receiving gifted services? How well are those gifted students performing? The Gifted Indicator measures whether opportunity and performance expectations are being met for gifted students. INDICATOR Gifted Summary Achievement This chart illustrates the test achievement levels by students identified as gifted in that test's subject. For example, how well do students identified as gifted in do on the state tests? Students Identified as Gifted 38.2% of enrollment 61.8% 1% 9% 1.6% Students Receiving Gifted Services 9.1% of enrollment 8% 7% 6% 56.9% 81.6% 75.9% 5% 78.3% 9.1% 29.1% 4% Identified as Gifted, Not Receiving Services Receiving Gifted Services 3% 2% 1% % 35.2% 18.1% 16.3% 9.% 7.9% 2.1% 2.% 6.% Math Science Social Studies Not Identified as Gifted Proficient Accelerated Advanced Advanced Plus Value-Added Value-Added measures the progress for all students identified as gifted in reading, math, and/or superior cognitive ability. B Performance Index This chart compares the Performance Index of students identified as gifted to those not identified as gifted. Gifted Non-Gifted 115.6 15.3 Page 7 of 23

Enrollment by Gifted Category These charts show the percentage of enrolled students that are identified as gifted and that are receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 24.% 2.% 16.% 12.% 8.% 4.%.% 21.2% 2.% 19.4% 19.9% 15.7% 4.8% 5.4% 4.2% 3.1%.5% Creative Thinking Math Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive 18.% 16.% 14.% 12.% 1.% 8.% 6.% 4.% 2.%.% 12.3% 17.3% 9.3% 4.9% 2.5% 1.9% Math Superior Cognitive Identified Receiving Services Identified Receiving Services Grades 4-8 Grades 9-12 24.% 2.% 16.% 12.% 8.% 4.% 2.5% 7.2% 22.2% 8.2% 22.7% 22.% 15.% 6.% 28.% 24.% 2.% 16.% 12.% 8.% 4.% 12.9% 23.1% 21.9% 24.7% 27.% 23.%.% 1.2% Creative.% Thinking Math Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive.% Creative Thinking Math Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Identified Receiving Services Identified Page 8 of 23

Identified and Receiving Services These charts show, of the students identified as gifted, the percentage of students receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 28.% 8.% 24.% 25.3% 7.% 75.% 2.% 16.% 12.% 2.7% 19.4% 6.% 5.% 4.% 3.% 4.% 53.6% 8.% 2.% 4.% 2.8%.%.%.% Creative Thinking Math Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive 1.%.% Math Superior Cognitive Grades 4-8 Grades 9-12 45.% 6.% 4.% 35.% 3.% 35.2% 36.9% 4.2% 4.% 2.% 25.% 2.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.% 15.% 1.% 5.% 5.3%.%.%.% Creative Thinking Math Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive -2.% -4.% -6.% Creative Thinking Math Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Page 9 of 23

Screening Acceleration This chart shows the percentage of students screened for gifted abilities this school year. 18% 16% 14% 12% 16.% Number of Subject Accelerated Students: 13 1% 8% 6% 4% 8.% 8.% Number of Whole-Grade Accelerated Students: 2% %.%.% Math Social Studies Science Superior Cognitive Page 1 of 23

Progress This is your district s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. It answers the question Did the students get a year s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less? A B NR C Coming in 215 Overall This measures the progress for all students in math and reading, grades 4-8. Gifted Students This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading, math, and/or superior cognitive ability. Students in the Lowest 2% in Achievement This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 2% statewide in reading and math achievement. Students with Disabilities This measures the progress for students with disabilities. High School A High School measure of progress will be reported in the 214-15 school year. Test Grade All Grades 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Progress Details This table shows the Progress scores by test grade and subject, and includes up to three years of data as available. Although Progress scores are not assigned letter grades at this level of detail, the grading scale applied at the Overall (All Students, All Tests) level is: Progress Score All Tests 3.94 7.7 6.99-2.12.2-1.32 5.38 5.9 6.78-1.27 2.6.71 2.56-2.66.6 2.1 6.93 5.83 A = 2. and up B = 1. to 1.99 C = -1. to.99 D = -2. to -1.1 F = below -2. NR High Mobility For districts and schools with a mobility rate of 25% or higher, this measures the progress of a subset of students that have been in the district for at least two years. This measure will not be included in the Progress component grade. Page 11 of 23

Progress vs. Performance Index This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's Performance Index results (horizontal axis) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical axis). The size of the bubble represents the size of the student subgroup. A B Grade C Overall Students w/ Disabilities Lowest 2% Gifted D F 2 4 6 8 1 12 Performance Index Page 12 of 23

Gap Closing This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, ethnicity, or disability? B Annual Measurable Objectives Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of student groups to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achieves that goal in reading, math and graduation and emphasize any achievement gaps that exist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels. Math Graduation Rate AMO Points 4 6 96.7 93.5 2 8 1 98.8 96.7 92.9 85 84.9% A = 9. - 1.% B = 8. - 89.9% C = 7. - 79.9% D = 6. - 69.9% F =. - 59.9% 78.4 91.7 56.9 83.3 98.8 2 4 6 8 1 All Students White Econ Disadvantage Students w/ Disabilities 2 4 6 8 1 White All Students Econ Disadvantage Students w/ Disabilities 2 4 6 8 1 All Students White The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 214 AMO for is 84.9%, for Math is 8.5%, and for Graduation Rate is 78.2%. Subgroups with fewer than 3 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs. Page 13 of 23

Graduation Rate This grade represents the percentage of students whom entered the 9th grade and graduated 4 and 5 years later. 4-Year Graduation Rate The 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 213 who graduated within four years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 21 and graduated by 213. 4-Year Rate 5-Year Rate A 98.8% A = 93. - 1.% B = 89. - 92.9% C = 84. - 88.9% D = 79. - 83.9% F =. - 78.9% 2 4 6 8 1 1 8 6 98.8 96.1 82.2 1 8 6 96.8 97.4 83.8 5-Year Graduation Rate The 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 212 who graduated within five years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 29 and graduated by 213. A 96.8% A = 95. - 1.% B = 9. - 94.9% C = 85. - 89.9% D = 8. - 84.9% F =. - 79.9% 2 4 6 8 1 4 2 District State Average Similar Districts 4 2 District State Average Similar Districts Page 14 of 23

Graduation Rate Trend 1% 99% 98.8% 98.8% 98% 97% 96.8% 96.% 95% 94% 93% 92.6% 21 211 212 213 4-Year 5-Year Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because the necessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year. Page 15 of 23

K-3 Literacy This grade answers the question - Are more students learning to read in kindergarten through third grade? Coming Soon K-3 Literacy 46.7% 7 out of 15 The K-3 Literacy measure is a new way to assess reading progress in kindergarten through third grade students. This measure is an important component of Ohio s commitment to early literacy. This is not to be confused with the Third Grade Guarantee, which measures whether third grade students are able to read at a third grade level and will be reported later. A number of districts have identified reporting errors with their submitted data which will affect the grades for all districts. This grade will be released as soon as it is determined to be accurate. < 1 NC < 1 NC < 1 NC < 1 In Your District... kindergarten students were not on-track last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 1st grade. first grade students were not on-track last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 2nd grade. second grade students were not ontrack last year. of those students improved to ontrack in 3rd grade. third grade students were not on-track this year. of those students reached proficiency NC on the 3rd grade OAA. Not On-Track at Point A Kindergarten Diagnostic, School Year 212-213 1st Grade Diagnostic, School Year 212-213 2nd Grade Diagnostic, School Year 212-213 3rd Grade Diagnostic, School Year 212-213 Details of Measure < 1 to < 1 to < 1 to < 1 to Improving to On-Track at Point B 1st Grade Diagnostic, School Year 213-214 2nd Grade Diagnostic, School Year 213-214 3rd Grade Diagnostic, School Year 213-214 3rd Grade OAA, School Year 213-214 Deduction for 3rd graders who did not pass OAA and were not on a Improvement and Monitoring Plan < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 NC Totals 15 < 1 Page 16 of 23

Percentage On-Track in Diagnostic Third Grade Guarantee Kindergarten Diagnostic First Grade Diagnostic Second Grade Diagnostic 1.% 94.4% 94.8%.% 5.6% 5.2% On- Track Not On-Track Ohio's Third Grade Guarantee is a program to identify students from Kindergarten through Grade 3 that are behind in reading. Schools will provide help and support to make sure students are on-track for reading success by the end of third grade. The program ensures that every struggling reader gets the support he or she needs to be able to learn and achieve. In kindergarten through grade three, schools will evaluate all children to determine if they are reading as well as they should be. If a child appears to be falling behind in reading, the school will immediately start a Improvement Plan. The Parent Roadmap is available to help parents understand how the Third Grade Guarantee applies to your child. Third Grade Diagnostic 87.5% 12.5% How many third graders met the Third Grade Guarantee requirements for promotion to 4th grade? Coming Soon % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% This chart shows the overall percentage of students that were on-track/not-on-track for each grade level reading diagnostic in 213-214. How many third graders scored proficient on the state test? 97.5% Page 17 of 23

Prepared for Success This grade answers the question Are students who graduate from your district ready for college or a career? There are many ways to show that graduates are prepared. How Prepared was Your 213 Graduating Class? Outcomes after High School Graduation ACT: Participation ACT: Remediation Free SAT: Participation 54.2% 47.% 74.7% Districts and schools have long-term impacts on student outcomes. The Prepared for Success component provides information on how schools prepare students for different pathways of college and career success. It also provides insights on how those students do once they leave high school. What happens beyond the diploma is an important indicator of how well schools are preparing students. SAT: Remediation Free 33.7% The University System of Ohio provides district reports on enrollment and remediation of high school graduates attending in-state, public colleges and universities. Honors Diploma Industry-Recognized Credential.% 26.5% Additional data on outcomes after high school are coming soon. These will include college graduation, demographics of college enrollees, workforce and military enlistment. Advanced Placement: Participation 3.1% AP: Exam Score of 3 or Better 65.1% Dual Enrollment Credit 7.2% % 25% 5% 75% 1% Note: These data represent students in the 4-year graduation rate, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 21. Page 18 of 23

Superintendent: Andrew K. Culp Phone: (614) 481-36 Address: 1587 W 3rd Ave County: Franklin Columbus OH 43212-2825 Directory information current as of the 213-214 Report Card publication date Your District's Students Average Daily Enrollment: 1,34 Number of Limited English Proficiency Students Excluded from Accountability Calculations: Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficiency Migrant Enrollment by Subgroup Enrollment # Enrollment % NC 12 1.2% 19 1.8% 15 1.4% 44 4.3% 943 91.2% 98 9.5% 117 11.3% NC NC 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % American Indian or Alaska... 1.2% 1.8% 1.4% 4.3% 91.2% Asian or Pacific Islander 9.5% 11.3% Black, Non-Hispanic -- NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economic Disadvantage Limited English Proficiency Migrant Enrollments of less than 1 students are not shown. Page 19 of 23

Attendance Attendance Rate All Students 96.1% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native NC Asian or Pacific Islander 96.4% Black, Non-Hispanic 95.3% Hispanic 96.6% Multiracial 97.4% White, Non-Hispanic 96.% Students with Disabilities 96.% Economic Disadvantage 94.7% Limited English Proficiency NC Migrant NC Male 96.% Female 96.1% NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % 96.1% 96.4%95.3%96.6%97.4%96.%96.%94.7% All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Students with Disabilities Asian or Pacific Islander Economic Disadvantage Attendance Rate is not shown if enrollment is less than 1. Page 2 of 23

Mobility Rates by Subgroup District Mobility % All Students 3.8% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native.% Asian or Pacific Islander 7.1% Black, Non-Hispanic.% Hispanic 26.3% Multiracial 6.5% White, Non-Hispanic 3.3% Students with Disabilities 12.4% Economically Disadvantaged 1.9% Limited English Proficiency 25.% Migrant 28% 24% 2% 16% 12% 8% 4% % 3.8% 7.1%.% 26.3% 6.5% 3.3% 12.4% 1.9% 25.% NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Students with Disabilities Migrant Asian or Pacific Islander Economic Disadvantage This chart shows the percentage of students who, because they moved into or out of the district, did not spend a majority of the school year within the district. Page 21 of 23

Your District's Teachers Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor's Degree Percentage of teachers with at least a Master's Degree Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes taught by properly certified teachers Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught by teachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure All Schools in the District 98.8 77. 94.6 High Poverty Schools Low Poverty Schools. 98.7. 76.8 -- -- 94.6 -- A district's high poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of the district's economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile, or in neither quartile. NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group Attendance Rate 95.7% Average Salary $72,994 Average Years of Experience 14 Wellness and Physical Education The extent to which students are successful in meeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's physical education standards Compliance with the federal requirement for implementing a local wellness policy Elected to administer BMI screening Participation in Physical Activity Pilot Program Moderate Success Page 22 of 23

Superintendent: Address: Andrew K. Culp 1587 W 3rd Ave Columbus OH 43212-2825 Phone: County: (614) 481-36 Franklin Your District's Schools School Achievement Performance Index Indicators Met Overall Gifted Progress Lowest 2% Achieve Students with Disabilitie s Gap Closing Annual Measurable Objectives Graduation Rate 4-Year Graduation Rate Grandview Heights High School A A NR NR NR NR A A A Larry Larson Middle School A A A C NR B A NR NR Robert Louis Stevenson Elementary School A A NR NR NR NR A NR NR 5-Year Graduation Rate Thomas A Edison Intermediate School A A A A NR C A NR NR K-3 Literacy K-3 Literacy Page 23 of 23