STATE OF EDUCATION Greater Houston

Similar documents
Educational Attainment

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Latino Males in Texas Community Colleges: A Phenomenological Study of Masculinity Constructs and their Effect on College Experiences

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

A Lesson Study Project: Connecting Theory and Practice Through the Development of an Exemplar Video for Algebra I Teachers and Students

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Shelters Elementary School

African American Success Initiative

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Trends & Issues Report

Reaching the Hispanic Market The Arbonne Hispanic Initiative

Campus Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan

u Articulation and Transfer Best Practices

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Best Colleges Main Survey

Annual Diversity Report

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Two-thirds of APS Schools Increase on State CCRPI Scores

Conroe Independent School District

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

DELIVERING A DEMAND LED SYSTEM IN THE U.S. THE ALAMO COMMUNITY COLLEGES APPROACH

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Transportation Equity Analysis

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Data Diskette & CD ROM

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

Idaho Public Schools

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Cooper Upper Elementary School

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

Texas Libraries: Responding to the Needs of Job Seekers

12-month Enrollment

Denver Public Schools

FeIL'1 Enactment Date:,2- io - ( C By: ----;1 >( DATE: February 10,2009!/

Apps4VA at JMU. Student Projects Featuring VLDS Data. Dr. Chris Mayfield. Department of Computer Science James Madison University

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Cy-Fair College Teacher Preparation and Certification Program Application Form

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

African American Male Achievement Update

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

El Toro Elementary School

Review of Student Assessment Data

Educational Resources. National Council or Teachers of English NCTE and Conference of English Leadership CEL

Updated: December Educational Attainment

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

JAMALIN R. HARP. Adjunct, Texas Christian University, Department of History January 2016 May 2016 HIST 10603: United States Before 1877

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Cuero Independent School District

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

Charter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan


PEIMS Submission 1 list

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

Apply Texas. Tracking Student Progress

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Emergency Medical Technician Course Application

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

MEMORANDUM. Leo Zuniga, Associate Vice Chancellor Communications

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Lied Scottsbluff Public Library Strategic Plan

Rural Education in Oregon

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Fruitvale Station Shopping Center > Retail

Transcription:

2018 School Rankings STATE OF EDUCATION Greater Houston Spring 2018

Overview of Presentation 1 STATEWIDE ANALYSIS 2 REGIONAL ANALYSIS 3 STATEWIDE DISTRICT ANALYSIS 4 GREATER HOUSTON ANALYSIS 5 GOLD RIBBON ANALYSIS 6 HOUSTON ISD IR SCHOOLS 2 2

STATEWIDE ANALYSIS 3

C@R ranks all elementary and middle schools across three main areas and all high schools across four main areas I II III IV ELEMENTARY + MIDDLE SCHOOLS HIGH SCHOOLS STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT ACHIEVEMENT + POVERTY STUDENT GROWTH COLLEGE READINESS To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 4

Statewide Grade Distribution of Schools by Grade Level % of Schools Statewide Ranked A B C D F ELEMENTARY 4,503 schools 10% 27% 27% 25% 11% MIDDLE 2,044 schools 11% 29% 30% 22% 8% HIGH 1,407 schools 12% 27% 29% 22% 10% Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 5

Statewide Grade Distribution of Elementary Schools Over Time % of Elementary Schools Statewide Ranked A B C D F YEAR 2016 7% 21% 26% 27% 19% 2017 8% 24% 27% 27% 14% 2018 10% 27% 27% 25% 11% Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 6

Statewide Grade Distribution of Middle Schools Over Time % of Middle Schools Statewide Ranked A B C D F YEAR 2016 9% 25% 28% 27% 11% 2017 12% 29% 29% 21% 9% 2018 11% 29% 30% 22% 8% Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 7

Statewide Grade Distribution of High Schools Over Time % of High Schools Statewide Ranked A B C D F YEAR 2016 7% 24% 27% 25% 17% 2017 11% 29% 26% 21% 13% 2018 12% 27% 29% 22% 10% Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 8

Schools with mobility rates below 9% are more likely to have an A than those with higher mobility rates Relationship Between Grades and Campus Mobility 0-9% mobility 9-13% mobility 13-17% mobility 17% + mobility A B 32% 38% 6% 2% 2% 11% 24% 37% 27% 35% 33% 36% Mobility is defined by TEA as the % of students who are enrolled at a school for less than 83% of the school year C D 17% 10% 19% 31% 3% 5% 9% F 9 Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 24%

Mobility Rates in Texas School Districts Highest Mobility Rates Compared to the Statewide Average Enrollm ent % Eco Dis Mobility Rate % A/B TEXAS 5291937 59% 14% 38% TEXAS COLLEGE PREPARATORY ACADEMIES 30394 49% 38% 30% KILLEEN ISD 42034 55% 24% 27% EDGEWOOD ISD 10674 87% 23% 11% CORPUS CHRISTI ISD 36698 68% 23% 25% SPRING ISD 35041 69% 23% 8% ALIEF ISD 46045 83% 22% 20% JUDSON ISD 22288 64% 22% 23% PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD 30827 88% 21 % 37% Mobility is defined by TEA as the % of students who are enrolled at a school for less than 83% of the school year SAN ANTONIO ISD 60706 90% 20% 6% VICTORIA ISD 1 3979 66% 20% 1 3% = higher than the statewide average = lower than the statewide average *Includes districts with at least 10,000 students 10

REGIONAL ANALYSIS 11

Demographics Statewide and in Major Regions Tot al # of St u d en t s % Eco Dis % Asian % Black % Hispanic % White % Other % in Special Educat ion Texas 5,025,094 58% 4% 12% 53% 28% 3% 9% Great er Houst on Area 1,266,077 56% 7% 17% 49% 24% 3% 8% Great er Nort h Texas Area 1,257,461 53% 7% 18% 41 % 31 % 3% 9% Great er San An t onio Area 41 3,006 59% 2% 7% 68% 20% 3% 10% Fort W ort h 343,71 2 56% 5% 1 9% 41 % 30% 4% 8% Rio Grande Valley 342,006 86% 0% 0% 97% 2% 0% 8% Great er Au st in Area 336,958 44% 6% 7% 47% 37% 4% 10% Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 12

The Rio Grande Valley region has the highest number of schools with an A or B grade despite having the highest percentage of low-income students Rio Grande Valley # of students: 349,555 North Texas # of students: 1,283,623 Houston # of students: 1,304,060 Tarrant County # of students: 351,171 Austin # of students: 349,276 Texas # of students: 5,291,937 San Antonio # of students: 444,331 % A and B Grades + % Economically Disadvantaged Students in Major Regions 46% 44% 54% 42% 57% 41% 55% 40% 44% 38% 59% 33% 59% 86% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % A or B Grades % Eco Dis Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 13

Nearly one-third of high-poverty schools in the Rio Grande Valley are high performing (with an A or B grade) despite 86% of students low-income Share of High-Performing Schools Among High- Poverty Schools in Major Regions Rio Grande Valley Texas North Texas Houston Tarrant County Austin San Antonio 13% 11% 9% 5% 4% 3% 31% 44% 59% 54% 57% 55% 59% 86% Gold Ribbon Schools are schools that have a student body that is at least 75% economically disadvantaged, have an A or B grade, and are not magnet or charter schools 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % Gold Ribbon Schools % Eco Dis Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 14

Comparison of Gold Ribbon Schools in Major Regions Share of High-Performing Schools Among High- Poverty Schools in Major Regions # of High- Poverty School # of Gold Ribbon Schools % Gold Ribbon Schools % Economically Disadvantaged Rio Grande Valley 426 134 31% 86% Texas 2,854 374 13% 59% North Texas 602 65 11% 54% Greater Houston 591 55 9% 57% Tarrant County 157 8 5% 55% Greater Austin 119 5 4% 44% Gold Ribbon Schools are schools that have a student body that is at least 75% economically disadvantaged, have an A or B grade, and are not magnet or charter schools Greater San Antonio 242 8 3% 59% Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 15

STATEWIDE DISTRICT ANALYSIS 16

Dallas ISD increased the most number of schools with A or B grade catching up to Houston ISD (both with nearly 1/3 of schools with an A or B) % A and B Grades + % Economically Disadvantaged Students in the 10 Largest School Districts in Texas (by enrollment) Katy ISD # of students: 72,026 Cypress-Fairbanks ISD # of students: 114,075 Fort Bend ISD # of students: 73,615 North East ISD # of students: 66,702 Northside ISD # of students: 105,002 Austin ISD # of students: 81,579 Houston ISD # of students: 229,399 Dallas ISD # of students: 154,428 Fort Worth ISD # of students: 85,106 San Antonio ISD # of students: 60,706 6% 16% 30% 33% 31% 37% 38% 44% 46% 50% 43% 50% 53% 58% 62% 69% 74% 76% 88% 90% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % A or B Grades % Eco Dis + 2% since 2017 + 6% since 2017 + 3% since 2017-6% since 2017-4% since 2017-2% since 2017 + 1% since 2017 + 10% since 2017 + 4% since 2017-1% since 2017 17

Dallas ISD nearly doubled the number of high-poverty, high-performing schools (with an A or B grade) from 22 schools to 40 schools Share of High-Performing Schools Among High-Poverty Schools in the 10 Largest School Districts in Texas (by enrollment) Dallas ISD Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Houston ISD Northside ISD Austin ISD Fort Worth ISD San Antonio ISD Katy ISD Fort Bend ISD North East ISD 20% 15% 11% 9% 7% 4% 1% 0% 0% 0% 30% 37% 50% 50% 53% 46% 74% 76% 88% 90% + 9% since 2017 + 1% since 2017 + 2% since 2017-3% since 2017-3% since 2017 + 0% since 2017-3% since 2017 + 0% since 2017 + 0% since 2017 + 0% since 2017 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % A or B Grades % Eco Dis 18

Comparison of Gold Ribbon Schools in Major Regions Share of High-Performing Schools Among High- Poverty Schools in Major Regions % Economically Disadvantage d # of High- Poverty School # of Gold Ribbon Schools % Gold Ribbon Schools % Change Since 2017 Dallas ISD 88% 201 40 20% + 9% Cy-Fair ISD 50% 13 2 15% + 1% Houston ISD 74% 196 21 11% + 2% Northside ISD 50% 22 2 9% - 3% Austin ISD 53% 56 4 7% - 3% Fort Worth ISD 76% 85 3 4% 0% San Antonio ISD 90% 85 1 1% - 3% Katy ISD 30% 1 0 0% 0% Fort Bend ISD 37% 12 0 0% 0% North East ISD 46% 17 0 0% 0% Gold Ribbon Schools are schools that have a student body that is at least 75% economically disadvantaged, have an A or B grade, and are not magnet or charter schools Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 19

GREATER HOUSTON REGIONAL ANALYSIS 20

Greater Houston Area Harris County Brazoria County Chambers County Fort Bend County Galveston County Liberty County Montgomery County Waller County 1.2 Million HTX Students Home to 1 in 4 students in Texas 56% of students in HTX are low-income 21

Academic Benchmark Performance in Greater Houston 3-5 th Grade Reading + Math Algebra I EOC English I + II EOC Average SAT Score Graduation Rates GREATER HOUSTON 47% Meet Grade Level 41% Meet Grade Level 46% Meet Grade Level 1361 Avg. Total Score 83% (C@R rate) TEXAS STATEWIDE 45% Meet Grade Level 40% Meet Grade Level 45% Meet Grade Level 1220 Avg. Total Score 86% (C@R rate) Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 22

Greater Houston Grade Distribution of Schools by Grade Level % of Schools in Greater Houston Ranked A B C D F ELEMENTARY 892 schools 13% 28% 27% 21% 10% MIDDLE 328 schools 19% 26% 32% 15% 8% HIGH 190 schools 22% 24% 21% 21% 13% Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 23

Comparison of A and B Schools in Major Regions % Schools Ranked A/B # Students per 1,000 in A/B Rio Grande Valley 46% 429 Greater North Texas Area 44% 431 Greater Houston Area 42% 444 Tarrant County 41% 413 Greater Austin Area 40% 471 Texas Statewide 38% 394 Greater San Antonio Area 33% 343 Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 24

Comparison of Gold Ribbon Schools in Major Regions % High Poverty* Gold Ribbon Schools # Students per 1,000 in Gold Ribbon Schools Rio Grande Valley 31% 289 Texas Statewide 13% 123 Greater North Texas Area 11% 91 Greater Houston Area 9% 83 Tarrant County 5% 40 Greater Austin Area 4% 47 Greater San Antonio Area 3% 26 *High-poverty schools defined as schools with at least 75% of students classified as economically disadvantaged. Gold Ribbon schools are high-poverty schools receiving an A or B. 25

GREATER HOUSTON DISTRICT ANALYSIS 26

School Indicator Performance in 10 Largest Districts in Greater Houston Enrollment % Eco Dis 3-5 th Grade Reading + Math Algebra I % Meets English I+II % Meets Average SAT Score Graduation Rate TEXAS 5.3 mill 59% 45% 40% 45% 1220 86% HOUSTON ISD 229,399 74% 41% 28% 35% 1278 78% CY-FAIRBANKS ISD 114,075 50% 52% 55% 59% 1477 86% FORT BEND ISD 73,615 37% 56% 52% 58% 1465 86% KATY ISD 72,026 30% 63% 62% 67% 1561 88% ALDINE ISD 59,541 86% 32% 28% 25% 1187 81% CONROE ISD 59,313 36% 60% 54% 60% 1495 81% PASADENA ISD 55,990 78% 36% 34% 34% 1290 80% KLEIN ISD 51,076 40% 53% 38% 53% 1472 85% ALIEF ISD 46,045 83% 33% 31% 31% 1289 82% CLEAR CREEK ISD 41,607 28% 57% 60% 65% 1551 86% Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 27

Comparison of A and B Schools in Largest HTX Districts Over Time % A/B Schools by District in 2017 & 2018-5 pts. 79% 74% -1 +1 pts. pts. 69% 69% 68% 68% 2017 2018 +4 pts. +6 pts. 64% 62% 60% 56% 55% +3 pts. 58% Most large school districts in Greater Houston improved between 2017 and 2018, increasing the share of schools receiving an A or B. +1 pts. 32% 33% +6 pts. 26% No change 20% 20% 20% +3 pts. 2017 2018 2% 5% CLEAR CREEK ISD CONROE ISD KATY ISD KLEIN ISD CY-FAIR ISD FORT BEND ISD HOUSTON ISD PASADENA ISD ALIEF ISD ALDINE ISD Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 28

Comparison of Gold Ribbon Schools in Largest HTX Districts Over Time % Gold Ribbon Schools by District in 2017 & 2018 2017 2018-11 pts. 20% +1 pts. +5 pts. +13 pts. 20% Half of large school districts in Greater Houston saw increases in highperforming, high-poverty schools. 14% 15% 16% +3 pts. Most other districts with fewer highpoverty schools saw declines or no change in Gold Ribbon schools 11% 11% 9% 8% 7% +2 pts. 2017 2018 4% No change No change No change 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% CONROE ISD CY-FAIR ISD ALIEF ISD HOUSTON ISD PASADENA ISD ALDINE ISD FORT BEND ISD KATY ISD KLEIN ISD CLEAR CREEK n=11 n=13 n=38 n=196 n=46 n=56 n=12 n=1 n=6 ISD Number of schools with at least 75% low-income students in 2018 29 * n=1 *No high-poverty schools in 2017

School Indicator Performance in 6 Largest Charter Districts in Greater Houston Enrollment % Eco Dis 3-5 th Grade Reading + Math Algebra I % Meets English I+II % Meets Average SAT Score Graduation Rate TEXAS 5.3 mill 59% 45% 40% 45% 1220 86% YES PREP 16,952 86% -- 67% 62% 1341 92% KIPP CHARTER 12,481 91% 53% 25% 52% 1324 94% HARMONY SCH. OF EXCELLENCE 7,602 56% 49% 66% 63% 1506 90% HARMONY SCH. OF SCIENCE 6,021 43% 67% 84% 80% 1610 94% HOUSTON GATEWAY ACADEMY 5,271 92% 72% 90% 67% 1224 83% HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY 5,071 74% 40% 62% 51% 1333 95% Source: CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings. To access the full CHILDREN AT RISK 2018 school rankings methodology, please visit https://texasschoolguide.org/ 30

Comparison of A and B Schools in HTX Charter Districts Over Time % A/B Schools by Charter District in 2017 & 2018 2017 2018 +3 pts. 100% 86% 89% -13 pts. 80% 67% 59% -1 pts. 58% No change 56% 56% +5 pts. 45% 50% Houston Gateway Academy was not ranked in 2017; in 2018, all 7 schools received an A or B 2017 2018 HARMONY SCHOOL OF SCIENCE - HOUSTON HARMONY SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE YES PREP PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY KIPP INC CHARTER * HOUSTON GATEWAY ACADEMY INC n=9 n=12 n=19 n=9 n=22 n=7 Number of schools in 2018; Only charters with at least 5,000 students are shown. 31

HARRIS COUNTY GOLD RIBBON ANALYSIS 32

Harris County Neighborhoods Kinder Institute s Community Tabulation Areas (CTAs) 143 CTAs in Harris County Based on Census tracts Designed to represent real communities Boundaries drawn based on community feedback For more info: http://www.datahouston.org/cta_documentation.pdf 33 5

Indicators Shown in Upcoming Maps: % of children in poverty % without a high school diploma % with bachelor s degree or higher % Hispanic/Latino and African American 34 5

Gold Ribbon Elementary Schools Across Harris County By Levels of Poverty % Children in Poverty Neighborhood Type % Children in Poverty, 2015 Gold Ribbon 35% Harris County 27% Note: Neighborhoods represented by Kinder Institute s Community Tabulated Areas. For more info: http://www.datahouston.org/cta_documentation.pdf 35 6

Gold Ribbon Elementary Schools Across Harris County By Education % Without High School Diploma Neighborhood Type % without HS diploma, 2015 Gold Ribbon 32% Harris County 20% Note: Neighborhoods represented by Kinder Institute s Community Tabulated Areas. For more info: http://www.datahouston.org/cta_documentation.pdf 36 7

Gold Ribbon Elementary Schools Across Harris County By Education % with Bachelor s Degree (over 25) Neighborhood Type % Bachelor s Degree, 2015 Gold Ribbon 17% Harris County 29% Note: Neighborhoods represented by Kinder Institute s Community Tabulated Areas. For more info: http://www.datahouston.org/cta_documentation.pdf 37 8

Gold Ribbon Elementary Schools Across Harris County By Race-Ethnicity % Hispanic or Latino Neighborhood Type % Hispanic or Latino, 2015 Gold Ribbon 56% Harris County 42% Note: Neighborhoods represented by Kinder Institute s Community Tabulated Areas. For more info: http://www.datahouston.org/cta_documentation.pdf 38 9

Gold Ribbon Elementary Schools Across Harris County By Race-Ethnicity % African American Neighborhood Type % African American, 2015 Gold Ribbon 19% Harris County 18% Note: Neighborhoods represented by Kinder Institute s Community Tabulated Areas. For more info: http://www.datahouston.org/cta_documentation.pdf 39 10

ANALYSIS OF HOUSTON ISD IR SCHOOLS 40

Houston ISD Schools at Risk (IR for 4 Years) Demographic Characteristics Source: Texas Education Agency s STAAR aggregate data for 2014-15 through 2016-17 schools years 41

Houston ISD Schools at Risk (IR for 4 Years) Elementary Schools Source: Texas Education Agency s STAAR aggregate data for 2014-15 through 2016-17 schools years 42

Houston ISD Schools at Risk (IR for 4 Years) Middle Schools Source: Texas Education Agency s STAAR aggregate data for 2014-15 through 2016-17 schools years 43

Houston ISD Schools at Risk (IR for 4 Years) High Schools Source: Texas Education Agency s STAAR aggregate data for 2014-15 through 2016-17 schools years 44

Houston ISD Schools feeding into Kashmere HS (IR for 4 Years) Kashmere HS Feeder Pattern At 2 out of 4 of the elementary schools feeding into Kashmere HS in 2017, fewer than half of students answered 50% of questions correctly on the 3 rd grade reading STAAR exam. In 2015, all 4 schools fell into that category. Source: Texas Education Agency s STAAR aggregate data for 2014-15 through 2016-17 schools years 45

Houston ISD Schools feeding into Worthing HS (IR for 4 Years) Worthing HS Feeder Pattern At 5 out of 6 of the elementary schools feeding into Worthing HS in 2017, fewer than half of students answered 50% of questions correctly on the 3 rd grade reading STAAR exam Source: Texas Education Agency s STAAR aggregate data for 2014-15 through 2016-17 schools years 46

Houston ISD Schools feeding into Wheatley HS (IR for 4 Years) Wheatley HS Feeder Pattern At 2 out of 8 of the elementary schools feeding into Wheatley HS in 2017, fewer than half of students answered 50% of questions correctly on the 3 rd grade reading STAAR exam. In 2015, 6 out of 8 schools fell into that category. Source: Texas Education Agency s STAAR aggregate data for 2014-15 through 2016-17 schools years 47

Houston ISD Schools at Risk Infant Mortality by Feeder Pattern Infant deaths per thousand, 2015 * Kashmere North Forest Scarborough Yates Washington Northside Chavez Furr * Worthing Austin Westbury Waltrip Houston Milby Charter Sharpstown Madison Sterling Heights Bellaire * Wheatley Lamar Wisdom Westside 2.6 8.6 8.2 7.8 7.7 7.1 7.0 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.0 5.9 5.9 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.4 5.3 5.3 4.7 4.1 12.4 12.3 Differences in academic performance across schools also reflect environmental stressors stretching back to early childhood. For instance, infant mortality is particularly high in the neighborhoods in the Kashmere feeder pattern. Source: Lakey et al (2018) estimates of infant mortality by zip code. Rate represents average across zip codes for schools in feeder pattern. 48

APPENDIX 49

Change in A and B Schools in 10 Largest Districts Over Time # Campuses # A/B 2018 % A/B 2018 # A/B 2017 % A/B 2017 DALLAS ISD 225 69 31% 47 21% FORT WORTH ISD 124 20 16% 15 12% CY-FAIR ISD 82 51 62% 46 56% KATY ISD 59 41 69% 38 68% FORT BEND ISD 72 42 58% 39 55% HOUSTON ISD 273 89 33% 87 32% SAN ANTONIO ISD 94 6 6% 6 7% AUSTIN ISD 113 43 38% 45 40% NORTHSIDE ISD 111 48 43% 51 47% NORTH EAST ISD 68 30 44% 34 50% % Change in A/B* +47% +33% +11% +8% +8% +2% 0% -4% -6% -12% *% change was calculated by subtracting the number of A or B rated schools in 2018 minus the number of A or B rated schools in 2017 and dividing the difference over the original number of A or B rated schools in 2017 50

Change in Gold Ribbon Schools in 10 Largest Districts Over Time # Campuses # GR 2018 % GR 2018 # GR 2017 % GR 2017 DALLAS ISD 225 40 20% 22 11% HOUSTON ISD 273 21 11% 16 8% CY-FAIR ISD 82 2 15% 2 14% FORT WORTH ISD 124 3 4% 3 3% FORT BEND ISD 72 0 0% 0 0% KATY ISD 59 0 0% 0 0% NORTH EAST ISD 68 0 0% 0 0% NORTHSIDE ISD 111 2 9% 3 12% AUSTIN ISD 113 4 7% 6 10% SAN ANTONIO ISD 94 0 0% 3 4% -100% % Change in Gold Ribbon* -33% -33% + 31% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% + 82% *% change was calculated by subtracting the number of A or B rated schools in 2018 minus the number of A or B rated schools in 2017 and dividing the difference over the original number of A or B rated schools in 2017 51