Role of Institutional Research to support Data-Driven Decision at CSU Fullerton

Similar documents
A Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and

Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results

Access Center Assessment Report

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Tableau Dashboards The Game Changer

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

Evaluation of Teach For America:

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

NTU Student Dashboard

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

EVALUATION PLAN

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

McNeese State University University of Louisiana System. GRAD Act Annual Report FY

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Purdue Data Summit Communication of Big Data Analytics. New SAT Predictive Validity Case Study

Financial Aid & Merit Scholarships Workshop

ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE. INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE (Excellence and Accountability)

Multiple regression as a practical tool for teacher preparation program evaluation

College Action Project Worksheet for CAP Projects March 18, 2016 Update

Creating a Culture of Transfer

B.S/M.A in Mathematics

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

Validation Requirements and Error Codes for Submitting Common Completion Metrics

District Consultation Council Meeting. April 24, :00 p.m. Anaheim Campus Room 105 AGENDA

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

The Role of Institutional Practices in College Student Persistence

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

ABILITY SORTING AND THE IMPORTANCE OF COLLEGE QUALITY TO STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM COMMUNITY COLLEGES

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

The Effects of Class Size on Student Achievement in Higher Education: Applying an Earnings Function. Michael Dillon** E. C.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND GOALS

Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School

Best Colleges Main Survey

UCLA Affordability. Ronald W. Johnson Director, Financial Aid Office. May 30, 2012

Mathematics. Mathematics

Chapters 1-5 Cumulative Assessment AP Statistics November 2008 Gillespie, Block 4

Predicting the Performance and Success of Construction Management Graduate Students using GRE Scores

Supplemental Focus Guide

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

4.0 CAPACITY AND UTILIZATION

UPDATES. Bronco Bookstore. Spring 2015

Knowledge powers Wisconsin s future:

Integrated Pell Grant Expansion and Bachelor s Completion Pay for Performance: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Harrison G. Holcomb William T.

Rachel Edmondson Adult Learner Analyst Jaci Leonard, UIC Analyst

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

State Budget Update February 2016

MIDTERM REPORT. Solano Community College 4000 Suisun Valley Road Fairfield, California

(ALMOST?) BREAKING THE GLASS CEILING: OPEN MERIT ADMISSIONS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION IN PAKISTAN

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

Doctoral Initiative on Minority Attrition and Completion

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Evaluation of Hybrid Online Instruction in Sport Management

The Diversity of STEM Majors and a Strategy for Improved STEM Retention

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WOULD THE ELIMINATION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AFFECT HIGHLY QUALIFIED MINORITY APPLICANTS? EVIDENCE FROM CALIFORNIA AND TEXAS

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

SUPPORTING COMMUNITY COLLEGE DELIVERY OF APPRENTICESHIPS

Diocesan Review April 14, Catholic Athletic Trails West Catholic High School Catholic Central High School

Financing Education In Minnesota

A Model to Predict 24-Hour Urinary Creatinine Level Using Repeated Measurements

COLLEGE ADMISSIONS Spring 2017

CI at a Glance. ttp://

A. General Information

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT EXTERNAL REVIEWER

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

The Impact of Honors Programs on Undergraduate Academic Performance, Retention, and Graduation

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

National Survey of Student Engagement at UND Highlights for Students. Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Office of Institutional Research April 19, 2012

Albany Technical College Overview Goals Student Success and Implementation Team Conclusion Next Steps...

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Instructor: Mario D. Garrett, Ph.D. Phone: Office: Hepner Hall (HH) 100

learning collegiate assessment]

LEN HIGHTOWER, Ph.D.

Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Doctoral Programs (Ed.D. and Ph.D.)

Student attrition at a new generation university

Transcription:

Graduation PRESENTATION Initiative TITLE 2025: Role of Institutional Research to support Data-Driven Decision at CSU Fullerton Nov 9, 2017 California Association of Institutional Research Conference Sunny Moon, Afshin Karimi, Alexis Furuichi, Yusuke Kuroki, Rohit Murarka, Susan Yang California State University, Fullerton 1

CSU Graduation Initiative 2025 Academic Preparation Enrollment Management Student Engagement and Well-Being Financial Aid Data-Driven Decision Making Administrative Barriers Increase Graduation Rates / Close Gaps 2

Cal State Fullerton Goals 90% 80% 70% 74.4% 85.0% 75.0% 60% 50% 40% 30% 62.3% 36.4% 44.0% 44.0% 20% 10% 22.0% 0% fall 2012 fall 2013 fall 2014 fall 2015 fall 2016 fall 2017 fall 2018 fall 2019 fall 2020 fall 2021 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 FTF 4-Year GR FTF 6-Year GR TR 2-Year GR TR 4-Year GR 3

70.0% 6-year Graduation Rates of First-Time Freshmen 65.0% 60.0% 55.0% 6-Year Graduation Rates First-Time Freshmen 50.0% 45.0% 40.0% 35.0% 80.0% 4-Year Graduation Rates of Transfers 30.0% fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 75.0% 70.0% 65.0% 4-Year Graduation Rates Transfers 60.0% 55.0% 50.0%

4-year Graduation Rates of First-Time Freshmen 24.0% 22.0% 20.0% 18.0% 4-Year Graduation Rates First-Time Freshmen 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall fall 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 40.0% 35.0% 2-Year Graduation Rates of Transfers 30.0% 25.0% 2-Year Graduation Rates Transfers 20.0% 15.0% 10.0%

2016-2017 : GI 2025 Advisory Group 6

GI 2025 Goals & Strategies : Cal State Fullerton Long-Term Goals Enrollment Management Data Capabilities Advising Fostering a Culture of Student Success Success in Low Completion-Rate Courses Targeted Support Services Pathways with K 12 and Community Colleges Strategies IT and IRAS support to develop/maintain interactive dashboard and train users for data-driven decision making Strategic Analysis Support 7

Data-Driven Decision Making 8

Data-Driven Decision Making 15 Units / Term 1 30 Units / Year 9

15 Units / Term 30 Units / Year 10

Data-Driven Decision Making 15 Units Campaign Concern for GPA? 1-Year Retention Rates? 4-Year Graduation Rates? Gap for Underrepresented Students? Gender Gap? 11

Strategic Analysis! 12

Data-Driven Decision Making: 15 Units Takers 15 Units Takers Graduate Better in 4-Years Logistic Regression on FTF 4-Year Graduation Rates Effects Coefficient (B) Wald 2 P Odds ratio 15 Units in 1 st Term.368 54.180.000 1.445 15 Units in 2 nd Term.996 380.029.000 2.708 Pell_Status -.350 41.764.000.705 First_Generation -.268 18.127.000.765 URM -.244 22.357.000.783 Sex.712 194.354.000 2.038 HSGPA 1.115 274.085.000 3.048 13

Data-Driven Decision Making: 15 Units Takers 15 Units Takers Graduate Faster Linear Regression on FTF Time-To-Degree Effects Coefficient (B) Beta F P 15 Units in 1 st Term -.147 -.093-8.249.000 15 Units in 2 nd Term -.288 -.205-17.984.000 Pell_Status.100.066 5.633.000 First_Generation.048.029 2.363.018 URM.064.044 3.752.000 Sex -.188 -.130-11.750.000 HSGPA -.248 -.140-12.709.000 14

Data-Driven Decision Making: 15 Units Takers 15 Units Takers Graduate Faster Semester Units Grouping Time-To-Degree 1 st Semester 2 nd Semester < 15 Units 4.92 Yrs >= 15 Units 4.66 Yrs < 15 Units 5.02 Yrs >= 15 Units 4.66 Yrs 15

Data-Driven Decision Making: 15 Units Takers 16

Data-Driven Decision Making: 15 Units Takers Units Taken of First-Time Frosh 2010 Cohort ~ 2013 Cohort Freshmen Group Fall 2013 Fall 2012 Fall 2011 N % N % N % Total # of FTF 4667 100% 4526 100% 4195 100% < 12 Units 155 3% 107 2% 104 2% = 12 units 1256 27% 1060 23% 1041 25% 12 < units < 15 2047 44% 1868 41% 1677 40% units > 15 1209 26% 1491 33% 1373 33% 17

30 Units Takers: UR vs. Non-UR First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort Planning #1 for Analysis DV: 4-Year Grad Rates IV: HS GPA, URM, Pell, 1 st Gen, Sex, 30-Units, URM x 30-Units 18

30 Units Takers: URM vs. Non-URM First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 4-Year Grad Rates 35% 17% 38% 31% 20% 15% < 30 >= 30 UR Non-UR Total 19

30 Units Takers: UR vs. Non-UR First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort Graduation Rates 1st Yr Units UR Non-UR Total < 30 15% 20% 17% >= 30 31% 38% 35% Total 18% 26% 22% UR: increase by 16 percentage point, increase by 107 percent Non-UR: increase by 18 percentage point, increase by 90 percent 20

30 Units Takers: UR vs. Non-UR First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort Graduation Rates Ratio (GRR) 1st Yr Units UR Non-UR < 30 1 (reference) GRR = 1.33 >= 30 1 (reference) GRR = 1.23 21

30 Units Takers: UR vs. Non-UR First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort Graduation Rates Ratio (GRR) 1st Yr Units UR Non-UR < 30 1 (reference) GRR = 1.33 >= 30 GRR = 2.07 GRR = 2.53 22

Logistic Regression with Interaction: 4-Year Graduation Rates Variables B Wald P. Exp(B) HS GPA 1.001 233.495.000 2.721 >= 30 Units.836 205.992.000 2.307 Sex.784 267.770.000 2.189 UR (Underrepresented) -.239 16.699.000.787 1 st Gen -.342 35.296.000.710 Pell -.354 53.010.000.702 30 Units x UR.056.325.569 1.057 Nagelkerke R Squared =.14 23

Logistic Regression with Interaction: 4-Year Graduation Rates Variables Effects HS GPA + + + >= 30 Units + + + Sex + + + UR (Underrepresented) - - 1 st Gen - - Pell - - 30 Units x UR No Interaction (Both UR & Non-UR gained similar benefits through taking 30 units / year) 24

30 Units Takers: UR vs. Non-UR First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort Planning #2 for Statistical Analysis DV: 1-Year Campus GPA, 4-Year Grad GPA IV: HS GPA, URM, Pell, 1 st Gen, Sex, 30-Units, URM x 30-Units 25

30 Units Takers: UR vs. Non-UR First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort 1-Year Campus GPA 1st Yr Units UR Non-UR Total < 30 2.74 2.90 2.82 >= 30 2.89 3.05 3.00 Total 2.77 2.95 2.87 26

30 Units Takers: URM vs. Non-URM First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort 1-Year Campus GPA 3.10 3.05 3.00 2.95 2.90 2.85 2.80 2.75 2.70 2.65 2.60 2.55 3.00 2.82 3.05 2.90 2.89 2.74 < 30 >= 30 UR Non-UR Total 27

2-Way Analysis of Covariance: 1-Year Campus GPA 28

2-Way Analysis of Covariance: 1-Year Campus GPA Variables F Sig. HS GPA 1861.25.000 >= 30 Units 125.25.000 UR (Underrepresented) 121.30.000 Sex 102.64.000 1 st Gen 53.84.000 Pell 10.25.001 30 Units x UR.17.676 R Squared =.19 29

2-Way Analysis of Covariance: 1-Year Campus GPA Variables Effects HS GPA + + + + >= 30 Units + + + Sex + + + UR (Underrepresented) - - - 1 st Gen - - Pell - - 30 Units x UR No Interaction (Both UR & Non-UR gained similar benefits through taking 30 units / year) 30

30 Units Takers: UR vs. Non-UR First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort 4-Year Graduation GPA 1st Yr Units UR Non-UR Total < 30 2.74 2.90 2.82 >= 30 2.89 3.05 3.00 Total 2.77 2.95 2.87 31

30 Units Takers: URM vs. Non-URM First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort 3.30 3.28 3.26 3.24 3.22 3.20 3.18 3.16 3.14 4-Year Graduation GPA 3.243 3.240 3.2766 3.2653 3.1867 3.1898 < 30 >= 30 UR Non-UR Total 32

2-Way Analysis of Covariance: 4-Year Graduation GPA 33

2-Way Analysis of Covariance: 4-Year Graduation GPA Variables F Sig. HS GPA 551.50.000 >= 30 Units.050.822 UR (Underrepresented) 20.62.000 Sex 17.49.000 1 st Gen 4.27.039 Pell 1.44.230 30 Units x UR.55.460 R Squared =.19 34

2-Way Analysis of Covariance: 4-Year Graduation GPA Variables Effects HS GPA + + + + + >= 30 Units No Significant Sex + + UR (Underrepresented) - - 1 st Gen - Pell 30 Units x UR No Significant No Interaction (Both UR & Non-UR gained similar benefits through taking 30 units / year) 35

Data-Driven Decision Making: 15 Units Takers Unit Cap 36

Data-Driven Decision Making: 15 Units Takers Units Taken of First-Time Frosh 2014 Cohort ~ 2017 Cohort Freshmen Group Fall 2017 Fall 2016 Fall 2015 Fall 2014 N % N % N % N % Total # of FTF 4437 100% 4426 100% 4401 100% 4357 100% < 12 Units 132 3% 152 3% 114 3% 114 3% = 12 units 1050 24% 1503 34% 1500 34% 1246 29% 12 < units < 15 1369 31% 1412 32% 1590 36% 1806 41% units > 15 1886 43% 1359 31% 1197 27% 1191 27% 37

Data-Driven Decision Making: 15 Units Takers More? How about after 2 nd year? 38

Data-Driven Decision Making: 15 Units Takers # Students in cohort 4-yr Grad Rates Sub-cohort (groups): 11,257 Sub-cohort: # Students retained for 2-yrs # Student Graduated Sub-cohort's 4-yr Grad Rate Fall 2011 Fall 2013 FTF Cohort 13,022 22.1% Students who completed first 2 Years AND attempted 30 units a year or more for the first two years Students who completed first 2 Years BUT did not attempt 30 units a year for the first two years 1,754 (16%) 850 48% 9,503 (84%) 2,024 21% 39

# Students in cohort 4-yr Grad Rates Sub-cohort (groups) Sub-cohort: # Students retained for 2-yrs # Student Graduated Sub-cohort's 4-yr Grad Rate Fall 13 4,512 22.6% Fall 12 4,419 22.0% Fall 11 4,091 21.9% Students who completed first 2 Years AND attempted 30 units a year or more for the first two years Students who completed first 2 Years BUT did not attempt 30 units a year for the first two years Students who completed first 2 Years AND attempted 30 units a year or more for the first two years Students who completed first 2 Years BUT did not attempt 30 units a year for the first two years Students who completed first 2 Years AND attempted 30 units a year or more for the first two years Students who completed first 2 Years BUT did not attempt 30 units a year for the first two years 473 (12%) 223 47.1% 3430 (88%) 793 23.1% 625 (16%) 314 50.2% 3,196 (84%) 653 20.4% 656 (19%) 313 47.7% 2,877 (81%) 578 20.1% 40

Data-Driven Decision Making Identifying Bottleneck Course Bottleneck Course for Graduation! 41

Data-Driven Decision Making for GI 2025 Graduation Bottleneck Courses 42

Data-Driven Decision Making Identifying Degree Candidate Completion Grant Incentives for Potential 4.5 / 2.5 Graduates 43

Identifying Degree Candidate Using Student Success Dashboard Potential 4.5 / 2.5 Graduates move the needle! 44

Completion Grant Incentives Incentives for Potential 4.5 / 2.5 Graduates Most grant receivers graduated by the end of summer 2017 Winter 2018 is open for potential 4.5 / 2.5 graduates, particularly those who entered as first-time freshmen in fall 2014 45

Data-Driven Decision Making SB 1440 ADT (Associate Degree for Transfer) Students 4 SB 1440 : How impactful? 46

SB1440 ADT Students Progression (ADT: Associate Degree Transfer) Cohort N All Transfers 2-Yr Grad Rate 4-Yr Grad Rate SB1440 New CC Transfers N 2-Yr Grad Rate 4-Yr Grad Rate fall 2012 4343 29.6% 74.4% 22 53.8% 92.3% fall 2013 4752 32.0% 158 49.4% fall 2014 3973 36.4% 453 44.7% fall 2015 3991 752 47

Data-Driven Decision Making Dashboard 5 48

Dashboards in CSU Fullerton 49

Data-Driven Decision Making Dashboard (Tableau Server Pilot) Student Success Dashboard Enrollment Management Dashboard College / Department Snapshot Dashboard Supplemental Instruction Dashboard Grade Distribution Dashboard 50

2017-2018 : Restructured GI 2025 Advisory Group 51

Q & A Sunny Moon, hmoon@fullerton.edu, 657-278-4749 http://www.fullerton.edu/analyticalstudies/ 52

Appendix (Thoughts) 53

30 Units Takers: Men vs. Women First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 4-Year Grad Rates 35% 42% 22% 17% 23% 26% 28% 11% 15% < 30 >= 30 Total Men Women Total 54

30 Units Takers: Men vs. Women First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort Graduation Rates 1st Yr Units Men Women Total < 30 11% 23% 17% >= 30 26% 42% 35% Total 15% 28% 22% Men: increase by 15 percentage point, increase by 118 percent Women: increase by 19 percentage point, increase by 83 percent 55

30 Units Takers: Men vs. Women First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort Graduation Rates Ratio (GRR) 1st Yr Units Men Women < 30 1 (reference) GRR = 2.09 >= 30 1 (reference) GRR = 1.62 56

30 Units Takers: Men vs. Women First-Time Freshmen 2011-2013 Cohort Graduation Rates Ratio (GRR) 1st Yr Units Men Women < 30 1 (reference) GRR = 2.09 >= 30 GRR = 2.36 GRR = 3.82 57