Al 2. Partnership Maps x 2 y 2 = z 2. F = Gm 1 m 2. A = πr 2. Appendix A: 197.0

Similar documents
The California Lottery. Contributions to Public Education

District/COE Name District ID TPA

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Listed below are the local organizations franchisees will support for 2017 Buck for Kids.

Demographic Analysis for Alameda Unified School District

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

CABE 2017 Planning Committee

WASC Special Visit Research Proposal: Phase IA. WASC views the Administration at California State University, Stanislaus (CSUS) as primarily

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

Fruitvale Station Shopping Center > Retail

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Biology and Microbiology

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

California State Lottery Education Allocations

Unequal Opportunity in Environmental Education: Environmental Education Programs and Funding at Contra Costa Secondary Schools.

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

1) AS /AA (Rev): Recognizing the Integration of Sustainability into California State University (CSU) Academic Endeavors

Presentation Team. Dr. Tony Ross, Vice President for Student Affairs, CSU Los Angeles

Self-Study Report. Markus Geissler, PhD

Constant Contact Survey Results

Space Inventory Handbook

Raising All Boats: Identifying and Profiling High- Performing California School Districts

History. 344 History. Program Student Learning Outcomes. Faculty and Offices. Degrees Awarded. A.A. Degree: History. College Requirements

PIQE OFFICERS STATEWIDE EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE BOARD OF DIRECTORS NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL

FRESNO COUNTY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN UPDATE

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

Guide to the Program in Comparative Culture Records, University of California, Irvine AS.014

Adult Education ACCE Presentation. Neil Kelly February 2, 2017

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

EDELINA M. BURCIAGA 3151 Social Science Plaza Irvine, CA

Evaluation of Teach For America:

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

El Toro Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Contra Costa College: HBCU Tour 2017 Due by Monday, January 9, Transfer Center SAB 227

Opportunity and Challenge Profile. President Sonoma State University Rohnert Park, California

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Mark Keppel High School

Executive Summary. Gautier High School

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Richard C. Schubert Curriculum Vitae

SPEAK UP 200 SCHOOLS 2009 PARTICIPATION

Draft Project Implementation Plan Measure E Bond. Board Meeting Presentation Updated August 26, 2016

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

JOSHUA GERALD LEPREE

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS SURVEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEVEL RLA/ELD WORKSHEET

Educational Attainment

Los Angeles Unified School District

Shakespeare Festival

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Free Fall. By: John Rogers, Melanie Bertrand, Rhoda Freelon, Sophie Fanelli. March 2011

MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEACHER DIFFERENCES IN MATHEMATICS ALTERNATIVE CERTIFICATION

Laura Aguilar: Show and Tell September 16, 2017-February 10, 2018

Deer Valley High School WASC MID CYCLE REPORT

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Reaching the Hispanic Market The Arbonne Hispanic Initiative

Call to Conference. Native Roots: Past, Present, and Future

ENGLISH. English PROGRAM GUIDE. Program Guide. effective for the school year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Our installer John Stoddard was polite, courteous, and efficient. The order was exactly as we had placed it and we are very satisfied.

California Science Center CALIFORNIA STATE SCIENCE FAIR 2014 Special Awards

Humanitas A. San Fernando High School. Smaller Learning Community Plan. Azucena Hernandez, Redesign Team. Bob Stromoski, Redesign Team

AGENDA COMMITTEE ON EDUCATIONAL POLICY

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Institutional Report. Spring 2014 CLA+ Results. Barton College. cla+

FY Matching Scholarship Grant Allocations by County Based on Free and Reduced Lunch (FRL) Population 1

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Institutional Report. Fall 2013 CLA+ Cross-Sectional Results. Barton College. cla+

The Dropout Crisis is a National Issue

A Lesson Study Project: Connecting Theory and Practice Through the Development of an Exemplar Video for Algebra I Teachers and Students

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

LEN HIGHTOWER, Ph.D.

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

STEM Professionals to Professional Educators Dr. Jennifer Gresko (Faculty Chair of Teacher Education) Principle Investigator

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

Summer in Madrid, Spain

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

ESL Summer Camp: June 18 July 27, 2012 Homestay Application (Please answer all questions completely)

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Antioch Charter Academy II

What's My Value? Using "Manipulatives" and Writing to Explain Place Value. by Amanda Donovan, 2016 CTI Fellow David Cox Road Elementary School

Sample Of Welcome Back Letter From Vacation

EPA Approved Laboratories for UCMR 3

cover Private Public Schools America s Michael J. Petrilli and Janie Scull

Charter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed

FeIL'1 Enactment Date:,2- io - ( C By: ----;1 >( DATE: February 10,2009!/

National Research Project for El Sistem a -inspired O rchestras. Greetings in January 9, 2015

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Transcription:

Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 Appendix A: A = πr 2 Partnership Maps x 2 y 2 = z 2 79 Au 197.0 F = Gm 1 m 2 /r

Public Works, Inc. 4 8 Cohort 3 Partnerships & 1 San Benito County and Academy for Rural Teachers 2 Baldwin Park Math Partnership 13 Central Coast and Partnership 14 West Contra Costa Math and Partnership 4 Colusa County Learning Community 5 Exemplary Content Coaching Enhancing Learning 6 Redwood Area Algebra for All 7 Students Exceling in Systematic Math Through Instructional Change 9 Monterey Bay Math Collaborative 10 Opens Doors 11 Support Initiative 12 Teacher s Collaborative Algebra Accessibility Project 6 12 14 3 Collaboration for Success in Partnership 8 Success for All 11 9 1 13 2 Key 3 5 7 10 & Only Only CaMSP 2009 Report Page A-1

California Department of Education Cohort 4 Partnerships 1 South Bay Collaborative 3 Imperial County Partnership 5 Lincoln Achievement in Partnership 6 Achievement in Little Lake for 7 Pajaro Valley USD Partnership 8 Pasadena Math Pipeline 9 Ravenswood Learning Collaborative for Student Acheivement 10 Sacramento Algebra Collaborative 11 ELDI ARISE 12 Developing Communities of Mathematical Inquiry 4 10 2 Carpinteria & Santa Barbara School-Community Initiative 4 Learning Activities through Kelseyville s Exemplary (LAKE) Collaborative 9 5 11 7 1 2 8 Key 6 12 Only Only 3 Page A-2 Appendix A: Partnership Maps

Public Works, Inc. 3 9 Cohort 5 Partnerships 2 Professional Learning Community 3 Wild Rivers Academy 7 Rigorous Instruction in Study 8 Partners as Resources to Improve Education 9 Shasta County Partnership 10 Washington Union CaMSP 2 7 1 Collaborating for Excellence in Middle School 4 Excellence in Instruction 5 Collaborative for Success in 6 Inquiry-based Readiness Academy & Sustainability 8 4 10 Key Only Only 6 1 5 CaMSP 2009 Report Page A-3

California Department of Education 11 Cohort 6 Partnerships 1 A-TEAM 2 Expert Teachers x Explicit Math Instruction = Exemplary Student Achievement 3 Success in Understanding Math 4 Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District 5 Fresno Academy 6 North East Bay Collaborative 8 Preparing for Success in Algebra 10 Salinas City Partnership 12 Project IMPACT 13 Whittier City School District 7 Kings Canyon Unified School District Project 9 Partners for Outstanding Education 11 Shasta COE Model Academy for Reflective Teaching 6 4 1 10 2 5 7 8 13 12 Key Only Only 9 3 Page A-4 Appendix A: Partnership Maps

Public Works, Inc. 3 Cohort Research Partnerships 1 Project Algebra Preparedness 2 Strategic and Intensive Initiative 3 North State Math Partnership 4 Central Valley Math Project 5 Los Angeles Unified School District Program 6 Working Together to Improve Education 6 2 4 5 Key 1 Only Only CaMSP 2009 Report Page A-5

California Department of Education Page A-6 Appendix A: Partnership Maps

Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 Appendix B: A = πr 2 Tables x 2 y 2 = z 2 79 Au 197.0 F = Gm 1 m 2 /r

Public Works, Inc. Appendix Table 1: List of Cohort 1 Partnerships by Lead District and El Rancho USD Coachella Valley USD Del Norte COE Lennox ESD El Centro ESD Fresno USD N. Monterey County USD Los Angeles USD Montebello USD San Pasqual Valley USD San Francisco USD Rialto USD Stockton City USD Salinas ESD* Tulare COE Themalito Union ESD* West Covina USD * Discontinued in 2005 during the mid-course review Appendix Table 2: List of Cohort 2 Partnership by Lead District and Alameda COE Hacienda La Puente USD* Chula Vista ESD Alhambra USD San Joaquin COE Emery USD Bellevue ESD* Tulare City ESD Franklin - McKinley ESD* Central USD Yreka Union ESD* Garvey ESD Gonzales USD Lodi USD Jefferson ESD Palmdale ESD Live Oak ESD Redwood City ESD* Pajaro Valley USD* Yolo COE Red Bluff Union ESD San Diego COE Sanger USD Vallejo City Whittier City ESD * Discontinued in 2006 during the mid-course review CaMSP 2009 Report Page B-1

California Department of Education Appendix Table 3: List of Cohort 3 Partnerships by Lead District & Colusa COE Centralia ESD Aromas/San Juan USD Fullerton ESD Marysville Joint USD Baldwin Park USD Healdsburg USD Santa Maria - Bonita ESD Lake Elsinore USD Vista USD Lawndale ESD* West Contra Costa USD Monterey Peninsula USD Wiseburn ESD* Palm Springs USD San Leandro USD San Rafael City ESD* * Discontinued in 2007 during the mid-course review Appendix Table 4: List of Cohort 4 Partnerships by Lead District Alum Rock ESD Imperial COE Lincoln USD Little Lake CSD Pajaro Valley USD Pasadena USD Ravenswood CSD Sacramento USD Santa Clara USD Westminster USD Carpinteria USD Kelseyville USD Oakland USD* * Discontinued in 2008 during the mid-course review Appendix Table 5: List of Cohort 5 Partnerships by Lead District Chico USD Del Norte County USD Placer COE San Francisco USD Shasta COE Washington Union HSD Anaheim High USD Elk Grove USD Lake Elsinore USD Lynwood USD Page B-2 Appendix B: Tables

Public Works, Inc. Appendix Table 6: List of Cohort Research Partnerships by Lead District Alameda COE El Rancho ESD Red Bluff ESD Sanger USD Los Angeles USD San Francisco USD Appendix Table 7: List of Cohort 6 Partnerships by Lead District Antioch USD Central USD Coachella Valley USD Fairfield -Suisun USD Fresno USD John Swett USD Los Angeles USD Salinas City ESD Upland USD Whittier City ESD Kings Canyon USD Ontario Montclair SD Shasta COE CaMSP 2009 Report Page B-3

Regression Tables California Department of Education Table 8: Regression Analysis of 2008 Combined CSTs and Algebra I CST Scaled Scores with Treatment, Prior Achievement and Demographic Variables as Predictors (Pooled) Combined (Pooled) Algebra I Variables β t p β t p Partnership Treatment 0.00980 4.583 0.000 0.0270 5.610 0.000 Prior Achievement (2007 CST) 0.709 279.6 0.000 0.682 119.5 0.000 Hispanic 0.0329 8.138 0.000 0.0283 3.214 0.001 White 0.0486 14.65 0.000 0.0420 5.735 0.000 Filipino 0.0203 7.624 0.000 0.0407 6.744 0.000 Asian 0.0471 14.25 0.000 0.0644 8.407 0.000 English Only -0.0174-6.083 0.000-0.0383-6.070 0.000 English Language Learner -0.0341-13.29 0.000-0.0504-9.249 0.000 Poverty (NSLP) -0.0326-13.41 0.000-0.0393-7.301 0.000 Special Education -0.0190-8.758 0.000-0.0166-3.411 0.001 Gifted and Talented 0.0827 34.76 0.000 0.0980 18.32 0.000 Observations 86,190 18,162 R-squared 0.606 0.584 Page B-4 Appendix B: Tables

Public Works, Inc. Table 9: Regression Analysis of 2008 Combined CSTs and Algebra I CST Scaled Scores for Cohorts 1, 3 and 4 with Treatment, Prior Achievement and Demographic Variables as Predictors (Cohort 1) Algebra I (Cohort 3) Combined Variables β t p β t p Partnership Treatment 0.0639 6.942 0.000 0.0157 3.955 0.000 Prior Achievement (2007 CST) 0.625 56.11 0.000 0.704 146.8 0.000 White 0.0270 2.869 0.004 0.0163 3.062 0.002 Filipino 0.0576 5.992 0.000 0.0118 2.884 0.004 Asian -0.0364-3.831 0.000 0.0491 11.76 0.000 African American 0.00145 0.156 0.876-0.0340-7.769 0.000 English Language Learner -0.0228-2.135 0.033-0.0376-7.192 0.000 Redesignated Fluent Eng. Prof. 0.0170 1.683 0.092 0.0171 3.493 0.000 Poverty (NSLP) -0.0343-3.596 0.000-0.0221-4.621 0.000 Special Education -0.0160-1.723 0.085-0.0176-4.360 0.000 Gifted and Talented 0.143 13.32 0.000 0.0822 18.55 0.000 Observations 5,562 24,246 R-squared 0.535 0.617 (Cohort 3) Algebra I (Cohort 4) Combined Variables β t p β t p Partnership Treatment 0.0456 4.393 0.000 0.0314 5.483 0.000 Prior Achievement (2007 CST) 0.671 53.50 0.000 0.699 95.78 0.000 White 0.0315 2.216 0.027 0.0296 4.052 0.000 Filipino 0.0111 1.050 0.294 0.00903 1.550 0.121 Asian 0.0477 4.501 0.000 0.0533 8.745 0.000 African American -0.0308-2.614 0.009-0.0157-2.443 0.015 English Language Learner -0.0263-2.086 0.037-0.0181-2.432 0.015 Redesignated Fluent Eng. Prof. 0.0136 1.044 0.297 0.00845 1.224 0.221 Poverty (NSLP) -0.0152-1.277 0.202-0.0297-4.279 0.000 Special Education -0.00165-0.161 0.872-0.0183-3.145 0.002 Gifted and Talented 0.110 9.456 0.000 0.0979 14.93 0.000 Observations 3,952 11,338 R-squared 0.596 0.630 CaMSP 2009 Report Page B-5

California Department of Education Table 10: Regression Analysis of 2008 Combined CSTs and Fifth Grade CST Scaled Scores with Treatment, Prior Achievement and Demographic Variables as Predictors (Pooled) Combined (5th & 8th Gr.) CSTs (Pooled) 5th Grade CSTs Variables β t p β t p Partnership Treatment 0.0191 3.548 0.000 0.0277 3.578 0.000 White 0.119 18.84 0.000 0.124 13.58 0.000 Filipino 0.0542 9.887 0.000 0.0368 4.650 0.000 Asian 0.111 20.10 0.000 0.0684 8.548 0.000 African American -0.0735-12.43 0.000-0.0747-8.994 0.000 English Language Learner -0.228-34.29 0.000-0.247-26.14 0.000 Redesignated Fluent Eng. Prof. 0.0626 9.670 0.000 0.0563 6.411 0.000 Poverty (NSLP) -0.0706-12.02 0.000-0.118-13.92 0.000 Special Education -0.108-19.75 0.000-0.0914-11.78 0.000 Gifted and Talented 0.347 61.67 0.000 0.338 41.93 0.000 Observations 22,828 10,882 R-squared 0.339 0.355 Page B-6 Appendix B: Tables