Germain Academy For Academic Achievement

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Engage Educate Empower

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Shelters Elementary School

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Val Verde Unified School District

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Hokulani Elementary School

Val Verde Unified School District

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Kahului Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

State Parental Involvement Plan

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

African American Male Achievement Update

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Data Diskette & CD ROM

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Cuero Independent School District

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

12-month Enrollment

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

University of Arizona

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

CDS Code

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Financing Education In Minnesota

World s Best Workforce Plan

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

State of New Jersey

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

State Budget Update February 2016

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Transportation Equity Analysis

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

3/6/2009. Residence Halls & Strategic t Planning Overview. Residence Halls Overview. Residence Halls: Marapai Supai Kachina

NC Community College System: Overview

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Clark Lane Middle School

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Organization Profile

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Transcription:

California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2015 16 School Year Published During 2016 17 Germain Academy For Academic Achievement By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners.) Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first come, first served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. About This School D I S T R I C T C O N T A C T I N F O R M A T I O N ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 6 1 7 ) District Name Los Angeles Unified School District Phone Number 213 241 1000 Superintendent E mail Address Web Site Michelle King michelle.king@lausd.net achieve.lausd.net http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 1/21

S C H O O L C O N T A C T I N F O R M A T I O N ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 6 1 7 ) School Name Street Germain Academy For Academic Achievement Germain Academy for Academic Achievement (Germain Acad AA) 20730 GERMAIN ST City, State, Zip CHATSWORTH, CA 91311 Phone Number 818 341 5821 Principal E mail Address Web Site LOPEZ, LUIS O llopez10@lausd.net germaincharter.org County District School (CDS) Code 19 64733 6017263 School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2016 17) All youth achieving is the overall mission of Los Angeles Unified School District. The District's vision is that every LAUSD student will complete high school college prepared and careerready. To achieve our mission and vision, all schools in the District are committed to meeting the five goals listed below: 1. 100% Graduation 2. Academic Proficiency for All Students 3. 100% Attendance 4. Student, Parent, and Community Engagement 5. School Safety This School Accountability Report Card shows how well our school and students are meeting the District's goals. S T U D E N T E N R O L L M E N T B Y G R A D E L E V E L ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 5 1 6 ) Grade Level Number of Students Kindergarten 97 Grade 1 87 Grade 2 91 Grade 3 83 Grade 4 75 Grade 5 73 Grade 6 0 Grade 7 0 Grade 8 0 Ungraded Elementary 0 Grade 9 0 Grade 10 0 Grade 11 0 Grade 12 0 Ungraded Secondary 0 Total Enrollment 506 http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 2/21

S T U D E N T E N R O L L M E N T B Y S T U D E N T G R O U P ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 5 1 6 ) Group of Total Enrollment Black or African American 6.1 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.8 Asian 13.4 Filipino 5.1 Hispanic or Latino 47.4 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.2 White 23.5 Two or More Races 3.4 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 60.5 English Learners 12.3 Students with Disabilities 9.1 Foster Youth 0.4 http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 3/21

A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair. T E A C H E R C R E D E N T I A L S Teachers School 2014 15 School 2015 16 School 2016 17 District 2016 17 Teachers With Full Credential 23 24!!tcred2016(5)!!!!tcred2016(8)!! Teachers Without Full Credential 0 0!!tcred2016(6)!!!!tcred2016(9)!! Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 2 3!!tcred2016(7)!!!!tcred2016(10)!! T E A C H E R M I S A S S I G N M E N T S A N D V A C A N T T E A C H E R P O S I T I O N S Indicator 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 0 0!!tp2016(5)!! Total Teacher Misassignments* 2 3!!tp2016(7)!! Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0!!tp2016(8)!! Note: "Misassignments" refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. C O R E A C A D E M I C C L A S S E S T A U G H T B Y H I G H L Y Q U A L I F I E D T E A C H E R S ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 5 1 6 ) of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Location of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 100 0 All Schools in District 91.86 8.14 High Poverty Schools in District 91.53 8.47 Low Poverty Schools in District 97.98 2.02 Note: High poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 4/21

Q U A L I T Y, C U R R E N C Y, A V A I L A B I L I T Y O F T E X T B O O K S A N D I N S T R U C T I O N A L M A T E R I A L S ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 6 1 7 ) ( M O N T H A N D Y E A R I N W H I C H D A T A W E R E C O L L E C T E D : O C T O B E R 2 0 1 5 ) Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials / Year of Adoption From Most Recent Adoption? Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy Reading / Language Arts 2011 Yes 0% Mathematics 2015 Yes 0% Science 2007 Yes 0% History Social Science 2006 Yes 0% Foreign Language N/A N/A N/A Health 2005 Yes 0% Visual and Performing Arts 2008 Yes 0% Science Laboratory Equipment (Grades 9 12) N/A N/A N/A Note: Assembly Bill X4 2 (Chapter 2, Statutes of 2009 10 Fourth Extraordinary Session) signed on July 28, 2009, suspended the process and procedures for adopting instructional materials, including framework revisions, until the 2013 14 school year. Senate Bill (Chapter 7 of the Statutes of 2011) extended that suspension until the 2015 16 school year. Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. * Science Lab equipment sufficiency is per school, not per pupil. School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements The District takes great efforts to ensure that all schools are clean, safe, and functional within the available resources. The District has established cleaning standards for all school facilities in assigning and inspecting custodial work. Food service and restroom facilities are given highest priority on a daily basis to ensure the health and safety of students and staff. Other cleaning functions may be scheduled on a less than daily frequency due to the limitation of available custodial resources. Determination of repair status is based on the most recent SARC Inspection. Additional information about the condition of the school facilities may be obtained from the school. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 5/21

S C H O O L F A C I L I T Y G O O D R E P A I R S T A T U S ( M O N T H A N D Y E A R O F M O S T R E C E N T F I T R E P O R T : A P R I L 2 0 1 5 ) System Inspected Repair Status Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned Gas Leaks Mechanical / HVAC Sewer Interior Surfaces Overall Cleanliness Pest / Vermin Infestation Electrical (Interior and Exterior) Restrooms Sinks / Drinking Fountains (Inside and Outside) Fire Safety Hazardous Materials (Interior and Exterior) Structural Damage Roofs Playground / School Grounds Windows / Doors / Gates / Fences Overall Rating EXEMPLARY Note: Not all of the cited maintenance deficiencies in this category have been repaired or mitigated to date, but have been reported via a Service Call and will be completed based on the priority, age and our resource availabilities. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 6/21

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for students in the general education population and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] and mathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. The CAAs have replaced the California Alternate Performance Assessment [CAPA] for ELA and mathematics, which were eliminated in 2015. Only eligible students may participate in the administration of the CAAs. CAA items are aligned with alternate achievement standards, which are linked with the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students with significant cognitive disabilities); and The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. C A A S P P T E S T R E S U L T S I N E N G L I S H L A N G U A G E A R T S / L I T E R A C Y ( E L A ) A N D M A T H E M A T I C S F O R A L L S T U D E N T S age of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards School District State Subject 2014 15 2015 16 2014 15 2015 16 2014 15 2015 16 English Language Arts / Literacy (Grades 3 8 and 11) 49 50 34 39 44 48 Mathematics (Grades 3 8 and 11) 42 43 25 29 34 36 Note: ages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 7/21

C A A S P P T E S T R E S U L T S I N E N G L I S H L A N G U A G E A R T S ( E L A ) B Y S T U D E N T G R O U P, G R A D E S T H R E E T H R O U G H E I G H T A N D G R A D E E L E V E N ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 5 1 6 ) E L A G R A D E 3 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Met or Exceeded All Students 82 81 98.78 53.09 Male 47 47 100.00 53.19 Female 35 34 97.14 52.94 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian 16 16 100.00 87.50 Filipino Hispanic or Latino 40 40 100.00 37.50 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White 13 13 100.00 69.23 Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 52 51 98.08 39.22 English Learners Students with Disabilities Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The " Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The " Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes ( ) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 8/21

C A A S P P T E S T R E S U L T S I N E N G L I S H L A N G U A G E A R T S ( E L A ) B Y S T U D E N T G R O U P, G R A D E S T H R E E T H R O U G H E I G H T A N D G R A D E E L E V E N ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 5 1 6 ) E L A G R A D E 4 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Met or Exceeded All Students 72 71 98.61 45.07 Male 46 45 97.83 33.33 Female 26 26 100.00 65.38 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino 31 30 96.77 43.33 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White 25 25 100.00 52.00 Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 46 45 97.83 37.78 English Learners 11 11 100.00 Students with Disabilities Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The " Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The " Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes ( ) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 9/21

C A A S P P T E S T R E S U L T S I N E N G L I S H L A N G U A G E A R T S ( E L A ) B Y S T U D E N T G R O U P, G R A D E S T H R E E T H R O U G H E I G H T A N D G R A D E E L E V E N ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 5 1 6 ) E L A G R A D E 5 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Met or Exceeded All Students 73 72 98.63 50.00 Male 26 26 100.00 30.77 Female 47 46 97.87 60.87 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian 11 11 100.00 72.73 Filipino Hispanic or Latino 33 33 100.00 33.33 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White 20 20 100.00 70.00 Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 45 45 100.00 42.22 English Learners Students with Disabilities Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The " Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The " Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes ( ) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 10/21

C A A S P P T E S T R E S U L T S I N M A T H E M A T I C S B Y S T U D E N T G R O U P, G R A D E S T H R E E T H R O U G H E I G H T A N D G R A D E E L E V E N ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 5 1 6 ) M A T H E M A T I C S G R A D E 3 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Met or Exceeded All Students 82 82 100.00 50.00 Male 47 47 100.00 53.19 Female 35 35 100.00 45.71 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian 16 16 100.00 93.75 Filipino Hispanic or Latino 40 40 100.00 32.50 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White 13 13 100.00 69.23 Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 52 52 100.00 34.62 English Learners Students with Disabilities Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The " Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The " Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes ( ) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 11/21

C A A S P P T E S T R E S U L T S I N M A T H E M A T I C S B Y S T U D E N T G R O U P, G R A D E S T H R E E T H R O U G H E I G H T A N D G R A D E E L E V E N ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 5 1 6 ) M A T H E M A T I C S G R A D E 4 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Met or Exceeded All Students 72 71 98.61 40.85 Male 46 45 97.83 35.56 Female 26 26 100.00 50.00 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino 31 30 96.77 30.00 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White 25 25 100.00 44.00 Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 46 45 97.83 33.33 English Learners 11 11 100.00 18.18 Students with Disabilities Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The " Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The " Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes ( ) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 12/21

C A A S P P T E S T R E S U L T S I N M A T H E M A T I C S B Y S T U D E N T G R O U P, G R A D E S T H R E E T H R O U G H E I G H T A N D G R A D E E L E V E N ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 5 1 6 ) M A T H E M A T I C S G R A D E 5 Student Group Total Enrollment Number Met or Exceeded All Students 73 73 100.00 36.99 Male 26 26 100.00 34.62 Female 47 47 100.00 38.30 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian 11 11 100.00 36.36 Filipino Hispanic or Latino 33 33 100.00 24.24 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White 20 20 100.00 55.00 Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 45 45 100.00 37.78 English Learners Students with Disabilities Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The " Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The " Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes ( ) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 13/21

C A A S P P T E S T R E S U L T S I N S C I E N C E F O R A L L S T U D E N T S age of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced School District State Subject 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 Science (Grades 5, 8, and 10) 71 78 60 50 46 46 60 56 54 Note: Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) in grades five, eight, and ten. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. C A A S P P T E S T R E S U L T S I N S C I E N C E B Y S T U D E N T G R O U P G R A D E S F I V E, E I G H T, A N D T E N ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 5 1 6 ) Student Group Total Enrollment Number of Students with Valid Scores age of Students with Valid Scores age at Proficient or Advanced All Students 73 73 100.00 60.27 Male 26 26 100.00 50.00 Female 47 47 100.00 65.96 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian 11 11 100.00 81.82 Filipino Hispanic or Latino 33 33 100.00 48.48 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White 20 20 100.00 70.00 Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 45 45 100.00 48.89 English Learners Students with Disabilities Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth Note: Science test results include CSTs, CMA, and CAPA in grades five, eight, and ten. The "Proficient or Advanced" is calculated by taking the total number of students who scored at Proficient or Advanced on the science assessment divided by the total number of students with valid scores. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Other Pupil Outcomes State Priority (Priority 8): http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 Pupil outcomes in the subject area of physical education. 14/21

Pupil outcomes in the subject area of physical education. C A L I F O R N I A P H Y S I C A L F I T N E S S T E S T R E S U L T S ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 5 1 6 ) Level Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9 age of Students Meeting Four of Six Fitness Standards 17.6 20.3 33.8 age of Students Meeting Five of Six Fitness Standards age of Students Meeting Six of Six Fitness Standards Note: ages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 15/21

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2016 17) To participate with any of the following opportunities, contact the school principal. School Year Advisory Council Governance Council PTA / PTO Classroom Volunteer Office Volunteer Supervision Volunteer Fund Raising School Beautification Other 2016 17 X X X X X X State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety. S U S P E N S I O N S A N D E X P U L S I O N S School District State Rate 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 Suspensions 0.71 0.53 0.74 1.30 0.91 0.93 4.36 3.80 3.65 Expulsions 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.10 0.09 0.09 School Safety Plan (School Year 2016 17) Our school makes every effort to provide a safe, clean environment for learning. Classroom space is used to support our instructional program. Emergency drills are routinely held for earthquake and fire preparedness for our students and staff. As required by California Education Code (CEC), Section 35294, the school's Safe School Plan was revised and reviewed with staff on the following dates: Safe School Plan Date Revised Date Reviewed with Staff Volume 1 Prevention Programs 2015 09 22 2015 09 22 Volume 2 Emergency Procedures 2015 09 29 2015 09 29 http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 16/21

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. On August 6, 2013, the United States Secretary of Education awarded the NCLB Waiver to eight California school districts, including Los Angeles Unified School District, that are part of the California Office to Reform Education (CORE) Consortium. The waiver allows the CORE districts to immediately implement an alternative accountability system, instead of the AYP. This new accountability system, School Quality Improvement System, will give the participating districts more flexibility and accountability in how they measure student performance and raise academic performance at the district level. While the California Department of Education (CDE) continues to publish AYP status for LAUSD schools, beginning in 2013 14 school year, the district will implement the School Quality Improvement System. The NCLB Waiver awarded to LAUSD allows for several flexibilities from the previous accountability system. While CDE continues to identify LAUSD and certain district schools to be in PI status, the corrective actions and other interventions previously required of PI district and schools are no longer mandatory as the district implements the School Quality Improvement System in 2014 15. Using the School Quality Improvement Index, the district will identify several categories of schools for improvement, including 'Priority', 'Focus', and 'Support'. The School Quality Improvement Index will also identify 'Reward' and 'Collaborative Partner' schools that have made progress, who may be required to partner with a Priority or Focus school to support improvement efforts. F E D E R A L I N T E R V E N T I O N P R O G R A M ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 6 1 7 ) Indicator School District Program Improvement Status Not in PI In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2004 2005 Year in Program Improvement* Year 3 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 652 of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 71.3 Note: Cells with NA values do not require data. A V E R A G E C L A S S S I Z E A N D C L A S S S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N ( E L E M E N T A R Y ) Grade Level Avg. Class Size 2013 14 Number of Classes* Avg. Class 2014 15 Number of Classes* Avg. Class 2015 16 Number of Classes* 1 20 21 32 33+ Size 1 20 21 32 33+ Size 1 20 21 32 33+ K 22 4 23 5 20 2 4 1 21 3 23 3 24 3 2 23 3 23 3 23 3 3 23 5 18 2 3 23 4 4 32 2 34 3 37 2 5 33 1 2 40 2 32 2 1 6 Other * Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class) http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 17/21

A V E R A G E C L A S S S I Z E A N D C L A S S S I Z E D I S T R I B U T I O N ( S E C O N D A R Y ) Material English Mathematics Science Social Science Avg. Class Size 2013 14 Number of Classes* Avg. Class 2014 15 Number of Classes* Avg. Class 2015 16 Number of Classes* 1 22 23 32 33+ Size 1 22 23 32 33+ Size 1 22 23 32 33+ * Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level. A C A D E M I C C O U N S E L O R S A N D O T H E R S U P P O R T S T A F F ( S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 1 4 1 5 ) Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor Academic Counselor 0.00 Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) 0.00 N/A Library Media Teacher (librarian) 0.00 N/A Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) n/a N/A Psychologist 0.28 N/A Social Worker 0.00 N/A Nurse 0.40 N/A Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 0.00 N/A Resource Specialist (non teaching) 0.00 N/A Other 0.00 N/A Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. * One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 18/21

E X P E N D I T U R E S P E R P U P I L A N D S C H O O L S I T E T E A C H E R S A L A R I E S ( F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 4 1 5 ) Expenditures Per Pupil Level Total Expenditures Supplemental / Restricted Basic / Unrestricted Average Teacher Salary School Site $7,327 $1,511 $5,817 $71,832 District N/A N/A $5,729 $68,881 Difference School Site and District N/A N/A 2% 4% State N/A N/A $5,348 $72,971 Difference School Site and State N/A N/A 9% 2% Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2014 15) This section provides information about the programs and supplemental services that are available at the school and funded through categorical sources. Title I funds are used to support effective, research based educational strategies for students not meeting the state's challenging academic achievement standards. Title I funds are distributed to schools with a minimum of 50% poverty on a per pupil basis. Based on an analysis of student achievement data, Title I resources may be used for professional development, TIER II supplemental instruction and intervention, parental involvement, personalization and support for students with at risk behaviors. Title III funds assist English Learners (EL) in acquiring English fluency, gaining access to the curriculum, and achieving grade level and graduation standards. Funds are distributed to school sites based on the number of EL students enrolled. Economic Impact Aid Limited English Proficient (EIA LEP) is a state categorical program that provides supplemental funds to support programs for English Learners. Use of supplemental EIA funds for English Learners at the school level is administered through the Single School Plan as approved by the School Site Council and the local governing board. Typical examples include funds set aside for professional development, the purchase of supplemental materials and expenses that support paraprofessionals, supplemental resource teachers, and the operation of EL advisory committees. School Year Title I Title III EIA LEP 2015 16 X X http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 19/21

T E A C H E R A N D A D M I N I S T R A T I V E S A L A R I E S ( F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 4 1 5 ) Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $39,788 $43,165 Mid Range Teacher Salary $63,553 $68,574 Highest Teacher Salary $78,906 $89,146 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $105,723 $111,129 Average Principal Salary (Middle) $115,222 $116,569 Average Principal Salary (High) $116,595 $127,448 Superintendent Salary $350,000 $234,382 of Budget for Teacher Salaries 35 38 of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5 5 Note: For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 20/21

Professional Development Most Recent 3 Years The professional development provided in the 2016 17 school year was designed to deepen the knowledge of teachers and schools leaders of the California content standards in English language arts, English language development, mathematics, science, and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects, visual performing arts, health, physical education, and other content subjects. The professional development has built upon the phases of implementation of the standards, the Professional Learning and Leadership Development initiatives incorporating the Teaching and Learning and School Leadership frameworks, and targeted instruction for our subgroups. The primary focus of professional development within the District continues to be focused on effective first instruction using the California Content Standards as the foundation for equity, access, culturally and linguistically responsive teaching, Universal Design for Learning, integration of social emotional learning, and multi tiered systems of support for both tier I instruction and tier II/III interventions for behavior and academics. The District encourages schools to use a Plan Deliver Reflect Revise model where teachers work collaboratively to construct instructional lessons, analyze student work, and reflect on instructional practices. The specific focus areas have been on the delivery of literacy and language instruction that ensures that all students read, write, speak and listen effectively, accurately, and fluently by the end of 2nd grade; the implementation of the California English Language Development Standards (CA ELD); the transition to the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS); and the development of the instructional leadership team to collectively build capacity that increases the ability of all educators to make the instructional changes needed for all students to be college and career ready. Time Contractually Allotted for Professional Development for Teachers* E L E M E N T A R Y S C H O O L S Academic Year Banked Time (Hours) Pupil Free (Hours) 2016 17 26 Hours 6 Hours 2015 16 26 Hours 6 Hours 2014 15 26 Hours 6 Hours S E C O N D A R Y S C H O O L S Academic Year Banked Time (Hours) Pupil Free (Hours) 2016 17 21 Hours 6 Hours 2015 16 21 Hours 6 Hours 2014 15 21 Hours 6 Hours Note: * Schools often provided additional professional development time based on specific school site scheduling and budgetary decisions. http://search.lausd.net/cgi bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc20152016&which=4117 21/21