ERCO Charter Application and Interview Questionnaire Evaluation Rubric Startup Schools

Similar documents
State Parental Involvement Plan

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

La Grange Park Public Library District Strategic Plan of Service FY 2014/ /16. Our Vision: Enriching Lives

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

MANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Writing an Effective Proposal for Teaching Grant: Focusing on Student Success & Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

The IDN Variant Issues Project: A Study of Issues Related to the Delegation of IDN Variant TLDs. 20 April 2011

Academic Affairs Policy #1

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

PCG Special Education Brief

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Wright Middle School Charter For Board and District review Final Draft, May 2001

The Teaching and Learning Center

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Academic Affairs Policy #1

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

STANISLAUS COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY CASE #08-04 LA GRANGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Wide Open Access: Information Literacy within Resource Sharing

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE

Program Change Proposal:

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

2. Sibling of a continuing student at the school requested. 3. Child of an employee of Anaheim Union High School District.

Financing Education In Minnesota

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Associate Professor of Electrical Power Systems Engineering (CAE17/06RA) School of Creative Arts and Engineering / Engineering

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

Current Position Information (if applicable) Current Status: SPA (Salary Grade ) EPA New Position

School Leadership Rubrics

2015 Annual Report to the School Community

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

University of Toronto

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

John F. Kennedy Middle School

LaGrange College. Faculty Handbook

DELAWARE CHARTER SCHOOL ANNUAL REPORT

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

School Data Profile/Analysis

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position)

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Office of Charter Schools 1025 Second Avenue Rm. 206 Oakland, CA P: F:

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

SORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS FLORIDA GREEK STANDARDS ACCREDITATION PROGRAM FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

4.0 CAPACITY AND UTILIZATION

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

SPORT CLUB POLICY MANUAL. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINoIS at CHICAGO

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

Transcription:

ERCO Charter Application and Interview Questionnaire Evaluation Rubric Startup Schools 1. MISSION, VISION & ALIGNMENT Evaluation Criteria (question #9, #28) The mission statement defines the purpose of the proposed charter school The mission is clear, concise, compelling and measurable The mission is reflected throughout all sections of the application The vision provides a coherent description of what the school will look like when it is achieving its mission The key design elements are aligned to the mission and critical to the school s success The key design elements are supported by research or evidence of success in schools or programs serving a similar target population 2. COMMUNITY MARKETING AND RECRUITMENT PLAN Evaluation Criteria (question #6, #8, #11, #13 15, #24, #28 (i), #29) The marketing and recruitment plan is reasonable and supported by a clear rationale The anticipated needs for staffing and resources align with the marketing and recruitment plan The application includes a clear description of the community in which the school intends to locate The application presents a compelling need for the community school within that community Includes outreach and recruitment strategies that demonstrate an understanding of the community likely to be served and are likely to allow the school to enroll sufficient numbers of students Provides an admissions plan that ensures the school is open to all eligible students Explains any admissions preferences and provides a reasonable rationale for such preferences, where applicable Provides an adequate transportation plan (*) (*May be in developmental stage) Page 1 of 7 ERCO, Revised 2/14/2018

3. EDUCATION PROGRAM AND GOALS Evaluation Criteria (question #23, #28) The education program is clear and coherent and supported by research and practice The education program is consistent with the school s mission and program design The education program presents a clear and coherent framework for teaching and learning, and demonstrates alignment with current state standards: Goals and objectives are specific, measurable, ambitious, attainable, and relevant Goals and objectives align with the school s mission and educational program Goals set high standards for student learning and school operations Page 2 of 7 ERCO, Revised 2/14/2018

4. EDUCATION PROGRAM: CURRICULUM, PEDAGOGY, ASSESSMENT, PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Evaluation Criteria (question #20 23, #28 (a)(c)(d)(f)(g)(j), #30 (d)(e) ) Curriculum is consistent with the school s mission and education program design; Curriculum presents a clear and coherent framework for teaching and learning, particularly in core academic areas, that incorporates or exceeds state standards Education program demonstrates understanding of relevant instructional strategies to meet the needs of all students Demonstrates understanding of the school s obligation to participate in the statewide system of assessment and accountability Demonstrates the validity and reliability of non standardized assessments, as well as how these assessments are aligned with the school design and high expectations Presents a credible sound plan for measuring and reporting the educational performance and progress of students Explains how the school will use assessment data to drive key decisions aimed at improving academic outcomes Defines clear promotion and retention policies and criteria(*) Includes a process for providing parents/guardians frequent information on their children s performance and progress, and for notification if a child may be retained(*) Explains how the needs of teachers will be assessed(*) Describes a comprehensive professional development program that will meet the needs of individual teachers.(*) (*May be in developmental stage) Page 3 of 7 ERCO, Revised 2/14/2018

5. EDUCATION PROGRAM: AT RISK STUDENTS Evaluation Criteria (question #2, #8, #28 (d)(g)(k)(m) ) Presents a clear process for identifying at risk students, including students with disabilities, English language learners, and other students at risk of failing Demonstrates that adequate resources and staff are devoted to meeting the needs of all students Describes the specific services that will be provided for at risk students within and outside the classroom Demonstrates an understanding of the laws and regulations governing services for at risk students Explains how parents will be involved in ensuring the needs of at risk students are met 6. EDUCATION PROGRAM: SCHOOL CULTURE AND DISCIPLINE Evaluation Criteria (question #28 (h)(l)(m) ) Describes appropriate and effective strategies to support a school climate that will allow for fulfillment of educational goals Includes evidence that the school will establish and maintain a safe environment conducive to learning Presents sound policies for student discipline, suspension, and expulsion, including procedures for due process (*) (* May be in developmental stage) Page 4 of 7 ERCO, Revised 2/14/2018

7. OPERATIONS: GOVERNANCE Evaluation Criteria (question #10, #16, #28 (k), #31 (a)(b)(e) ) Demonstrates that the applicant has a strong understanding of the roles and responsibilities of a governing board of trustees that is aligned to the school s mission and ensures meaningful oversight of school performance, operations, and financials Demonstrates board structures and procedures that will allow it to effectively govern the school Demonstrates that the board membership has capacity to contribute the wide range of relevant knowledge, skills, and commitment needed to oversee a successful charter school, including educational, financial, legal, and community experience and expertise Describes the role of parents in the governance of the school, if applicable Provides plans for meaningful training for board members 8. OPERATIONS: ORGANIZATION Evaluation Criteria (question #26, #30) Provides a sensible organizational chart that properly indicates all positions, delineating board and management roles and lines of authority Describes the structure and responsibilities of staff members that include effective assignment of management roles and responsibilities for instructional leadership, curriculum, personnel, budgeting, financial management, legal compliance, and any special staffing needs Identifies qualifications and competencies of the lead person that align with the school s mission and program and demonstrate lead person s capacity to successfully manage the school Demonstrates a sound understanding of staffing needs that are aligned with the budget and with the school s anticipated/actual enrollment Page 5 of 7 ERCO, Revised 2/14/2018

9. OPERATIONS: FACILITY Evaluation Criteria (question #3, #12, #30 (L)(m) ) Demonstrates that the founders have identified a viable educational facility that can meet the needs of the students and accommodate the programmatic and operational needs of the school over the charter term as described throughout the application Demonstrates knowledge of facilities costs including, as applicable, cost of purchasing, leasing, building, or renovating an educational facility that conforms to applicable health, safety, and occupancy requirements Demonstrate that any proposed plans for acquisition and renovation of facilities are reasonable in their scope, timeline, and costs, and that the school has the capacity and plans to allocate project management resources to manage risks of on time completion 10. OPERATIONS: BUDGET AND FINANCES Evaluation Criteria (question #27, #30 (f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)(n)(o)(p) ) Any revenue and expenditure assumptions demonstrated are balanced, realistic and evidence based Demonstrates adequate contingency planning 11. DEVELOPER CAPACITY Evaluation Criteria (question #1 8, #24, #25, #27, #30 (b)(o)(p) ) Developer(s) demonstrate(s) adequate planning, leadership and business experience to successfully open and operate a community school The experience and public record of developer(s) indicates a history and/or likelihood of success on academic, financial, and operational bases Page 6 of 7 ERCO, Revised 2/14/2018

SCORING (1 4 ON EACH COMPONENT) 1. Mission, Vision and Alignment 2. Community Marketing and Recruitment Plan 3. Education Program and Goals 4. Education Program: Curriculum, Pedagogy, Assessment & PD 5. Education Program: At Risk Students 6. Education Program: School Culture and Discipline 7. Operations: Governance 8. Operations: Organization 9. Operations: Facility 10. Operations: Budget and Finances 11. Developer Capacity TOTAL (NUMBER OF SECTIONS) 11 MEAN SCALE 4 3 2 1 Meets Approaches Expectations Expectations Exceeds Expectations Below Expectations Page 7 of 7 ERCO, Revised 2/14/2018