School Finance 101 School Finance Fundamentals

Similar documents
Financing Education In Minnesota

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Tale of Two Tollands

Michigan and Ohio K-12 Educational Financing Systems: Equality and Efficiency. Michael Conlin Michigan State University

Program budget Budget FY 2013

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

State Budget Update February 2016

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS

Fiscal Years [Millions of Dollars] Provision Effective

EDUCATION AND DECENTRALIZATION

ASCD Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind

Welcome. Paulo Goes Dean, Eller College of Management Welcome Our region

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

FTE General Instructions

NC Community College System: Overview

Modern Trends in Higher Education Funding. Tilea Doina Maria a, Vasile Bleotu b

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

Scholarship Reporting

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

TENNESSEE S ECONOMY: Implications for Economic Development

Presentation of the English Montreal School Board To Mme Michelle Courchesne, Ministre de l Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport on

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

Trends in College Pricing

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

MINNESOTA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Dr. Brent Benda and Ms. Nell Smith

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Financial Plan. Operating and Capital. May2010

School of Medicine Finances, Funds Flows, and Fun Facts. Presentation for Research Wednesday June 11, 2014

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Texas A&M University-Texarkana

Chapter Six The Non-Monetary Benefits of Higher Education

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Federal Update. Angela Smith, Training Officer U.S. Dept. of ED, Federal Student Aid WHITE HOUSE STUDENT LOAN INITIATIVES

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

FY 2018 Guidance Document for School Readiness Plus Program Design and Site Location and Multiple Calendars Worksheets

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

HARLOW COLLEGE FURTHER EDUCATION CORPORATION RESOURCES COMMITTEE. Minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 12 May 2016

Estimating the Cost of Meeting Student Performance Standards in the St. Louis Public Schools

Series IV - Financial Management and Marketing Fiscal Year

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Xenia Community Schools Board of Education Goals. Approved May 12, 2014

A New Compact for Higher Education in Virginia

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

Hampton Falls School Board Meeting September 1, W. Skoglund and S. Smylie.

Getting Lost While Trying to Follow the Money: Special Education Finance in Charter Schools

A Financial Model to Support the Future of The California State University

Trends & Issues Report

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

E35 RE-DISCOVER CAREERS AND EDUCATION THROUGH 2020

KSBA Staff Review of HB 520 Charter Schools Rep. Carney - (as introduced )

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

University of Central Florida Board of Trustees Finance and Facilities Committee

Buffalo School Board Governance

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

OREGON TECH ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Master of Science in Taxation (M.S.T.) Program

WASHINGTON COLLEGE SAVINGS

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

Draft Budget : Higher Education

Announcement of Vacancy Superintendent of Schools. Frontier Central School District. Apply by October 20, 2017 to:

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

Seminole State College Board Regents Regular Meeting

Rethinking the Federal Role in Elementary and Secondary Education

DRAFT VERSION 2, 02/24/12

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

that when ONE ISSUE NUMBER e Education Chair House Rep. Harry Brooks favor. evaluations, Jim Coley of on their own evaluated

Why Philadelphia s Public School Problems Are Bad For Business

Rural Education in Oregon

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

Parent Teacher Association Constitution

Shelters Elementary School

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) 1O1

In 2010, the Teach Plus-Indianapolis Teaching Policy Fellows, a cohort of early career educators teaching

New Program Process, Guidelines and Template

District Superintendent

Transcription:

School Finance 101 School Finance Fundamentals January 10, 2015 Zane K. Woolstenhulme Business Administrator Ogden School District zanew@ogdensd.org

Discussion Topics REVENUE SOURCES REVENUE DISTRIBUTION (WPU) MINIMUM SCHOOL PROGRAM GROWTH Q & A

REVENUE SOURCES 2013 Public Education General Fund --- Total Revenue $4,977,879,407 USOE Fingertip Facts 2013-14 Federal, 8.01% State, 65.26% Local, 26.73%

LOCAL REVENUE PROPERTY TAXES (Taxable Value X Tax Rate) Basic Levy (Set by State).001419 --- Same for all School Districts) Board Local Levy (Legal Max.001800 or.002500) Voted Local Levy (Voter Authorized, Max.002000) INTEREST INCOME SCHOOL & ACTIVITY FEES INTER-DISTRICT BILLINGS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RDA) PAYMENTS Source: USOE 2013-14 Fingertip FACTS Local Sources - General Fund 10% Property Taxes 90% Other Sources

FISCALYEAR BASIC LEVY 1986-87.004256 1994-95.004220 1995-96.002640 2000-01.001881 2005-6.001720 2008-09.001250 2012-13.001650 2014-15.001419 Source: Office of Legislative Fiscal Analyst BASIC LEVY HISTORY What If??? $200,000 0.0050000 0.0040000 0.0030000 0.0020000 0.0010000 0.0000000 $312/yr. or $26 per month $562,578,030 BASIC LEVY 1987-Present

FEDERAL REVENUE NCLB NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND --TITLE PROGRAMS Poverty Mobility & Homeless English Language Learners Quality Teaching / Professional Development 21 st Century Schools IDEA SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS Medicare & Medicaid Reimbursement Programs FEDERAL IMPACT AID DIRECT GRANTS

STATE REVENUE STATE INCOME TAX (Primary Source) SCHOOL LAND TRUST (INTEREST & DIVIDENDS) OTHER STATE EDUCATION FUND $ 3.2 Billion --- FY2013

Constitutional Amendment Utah voters passed a ballot measure that enabled legislators to use income tax dollars for higher education. This, combined with the use of sales tax earmarks for roads, started the complex practice of robbing Peter to pay Paul. Natalie Gochnour (Deseret News Op Ed: Oct 3, 2014) Associate Dean, David Eccles School of Business, U of U; Chief Economist, Salt Lake Chamber

WHAT CHANGED? Education Fund (Income Tax) General Fund (Sales Tax) Public Education Higher Education Transportation

EDUCATION FUND YEAR Public Education % Higher Education & Other Agencies 1995 $ 1,123,510,466 98% $ 18,046,000 2 % 2000 $ 1,564,339,000 88% $ 212,094,000 12% 2003 $ 1,676,555,994 98% $ 33,800,000 2 % 2005 $ 1,813,679,811 86% $ 288,871,600 14 % 2008 $ 2,599,935,408 72% $ 1,006,334,700 28% 2013 $ 2,663,650,000 83% $ 563,617,000 17 % Source: Appropriations Reports, Office of Legislative Fiscal Analyst %

The Rest of the Story In fiscal year 2015, the state spent $630 million from the education fund for higher education, $432 million in general fund for higher education, and $458 million in sales tax earmarks for transportation. The budget buckets have become completely co-mingled. Natalie Gochnour Continued (Deseret News Op Ed: Oct 3, 2014) Associate Dean, David Eccles School of Business, U of U; Chief Economist, Salt Lake Chamber

From the Horses Mouth Groups representing public education, transportation and water development will be coming to the 2015 Legislature asking for more money most likely even some kind of tax hike(s). Hughes rules out, from the outset, a general tax increase. I don t think you will see any tax hikes, said Hughes. However, you could see tax revenue shifts along several fronts with no increase in the amount of money state government takes from citizens. For example, some lawmakers want to remove the current sales tax earmark for transportation, or road building. Imposed several years ago over a gubernatorial veto, the earmark sends tens of millions of dollar each year to roadwork. If you gave that money back to the state s General Fund, then you could use that money for colleges and universities, and, in turn, allocate more personal and corporate income taxes to public education. That would not give public education a huge amount of new money, which is what some public school advocates want. But it s a change the Republican House could discuss, said Hughes. Today At Utah Policy Interview by Bob Bernick with newly elected House Speaker Greg Hughes Written November 17, 2014

OTHERWISE SAID: Education Fund (Income Tax) General Fund (Sales Tax) Public Education Higher Education Transportation

STATE FUNDING How Does The Money Flow? Funding Distribution?

MINIMUM SCHOOL PROGRAM (MSP) The Minimum School Program (MSP) is the primary funding source for school districts and charter schools in Utah. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 total budget is $3,349,784,700 including state and local dollars. The MSP represents approximately 48.68% of total expenditures, while the balance includes 34.85% of local revenue, 8.73% of federal revenue, and 7.74% comes from other sources of revenue. The funds are used to support over 1,000 traditional, alternative, special education and charter schools for approximately 600,000 Utah students. MSP funds are distributed according to formulas provided by State law, and State Board rules. http://www.schools.utah.gov/finance/minimum-school-program.aspx

Weighted Pupil Unit PRIMARY DISTRIBUTION UNIT WITHIN MINIMUM SCHOOL PROGRAM 180 DAYS OF MEMBERSHIP ONE WPU (Membership Driven not Attendance Driven) NOT ALL WPUS HAVE EQUAL VALUE & WEIGHT

WPU VALUE($) $ 2,972 Exceptions: Special Education & Career & Tech Ed (CTE) $ 2,726

WPU WEIGHTING SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENTS Kindergarten Students --- 55% Grades One thru 12 ---- 100% CHARTER SCHOOL STUDENTS Kindergarten Students --- 55% Grades One thru Six ---- 90% Grades Seven & Eight ----- 99% Grades Nine thru 12 ---- 120%

WPU HISTORY FISCAL YEAR WPU VALUE CPI Adjusted 1986-87 $1,204 $2,422 1994-95 $1,608 $2,582 2000-01 $2,006 $2,772 2006-07 $2,417 $2,854 2008-09 $2,577 $2,849 2011-12 $2,816 $2,979 2014-15 $2,972 $2,972 Change: $ 1,768 $ 550 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $- $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $- WPU Value CPI Adjusted WPU Value Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Minimum School Programs A.Basic School Programs Regular Restricted B.Related to Basic School Programs C.Board and Voted Local Levy Programs D.School Building Programs (Funded Separately from MSP)

MSP ---- The Equalizer DISTRICT ALPINE SALT LAKE PARK CITY SOUTH SANPETE BASIC SCHOOL PROGRAMS Allocation Actual Locally Funded (FY 14 Basic Rate.001535) Morgan $261,651,891 $ 89,430,154 $ 17,054,766 $ 13,516,830 $ 9,603,534 $ 25,446,597 $ 27,479,103 $ 17,054,766 $ 863,974 $ 1,430,914 MSP STATE FUNDED $236,205,294 $ 61,951,051 N/A $ 12,652,856 $ 8,172,620 Percent State Funded 90% 69% Zero 95% 85% Average All Districts 85% Source: USOE -- FY14 Final Summaries

The Infamous LINE

Minimum School Programs A.Basic School Programs (WPU Driven) T H E L I N E B.Related to Basic School Programs C.Board and Voted Local Levy Programs D.School Building Programs (Funded Separately from MSP)

Basic School Programs - Regular 1. Kindergarten (29,215 WPUs, $86.8 Million) 2. Grades 1-12 (555,130 WPUs, $1.65 Billion) 3. Necessarily Existent Small Schools (9,357 WPUs, $28.5 Million) 4. Professional Staff Cost (53,041 WPUs, $157.6 Million) 5. Administrative Costs (1,505 WPUs, $4.5 Million) Per MSP MIDYEAR UPDATE FY15 --- USOE

Basic School Programs - Restricted Special Education Programs (100,365 WPUs, $ 280.3 Million) Regular Add-on (72,991 WPUs, $ 199 Million) Regular Self-Contained (14,285 WPUs, $ 42.5 Million) Pre-School (53,041 WPUs, $ 29 Million) Extended Year Program (429 WPUs, $ 1.3 Million) State Programs (1,505 WPUs, $ 8.6 Million ) Career & Technology Education Add On (29, (29,705 WPU s, $ 81 Million) Class Size Reduction (38,958 WPUs, $115.8 Million) Note: Based on the average teacher s salary --- 1,500 + teachers state-wide.

WPU VALUE($) $ 2,972 Exceptions: Special Education & Career & Tech Ed (CTE) $ 2,726 102,000 WPUs @ $246 $25+ Million 1% Increase on WPU (Approximate cost to Bring Back into Parity)

Basic School Programs (WPU DRIVEN FUNDING) ABOVE The LINE BELOW Related to Basic School Programs (Non-WPU Formula Driven Funding)

Related to Basic Programs 1.To and From School Pupil Transportation $72 Million 68% -vs- 85% $18 Million 2.Guarantee Transportation Levy $500K 3.Flexible Allocation Distribution $23 Million

Related to Basic Programs (Continued) Special Populations Enhancement for At-Risk Students ($24.3 Million) Youth in Custody ($20 Million) Adult Education ($9.8 Million) Enhancement for Accelerated Students ($4.4 Million) Concurrent Enrollment ($9.3 Million) Title 1 Schools in Improvement --- Para-educators ($300K)

Related to Basic Programs (Continued) Other Programs 1. School Land Trust Program ($37.6 Million) Avg./$49/Student 2. Charter School Local Replacement ($98.3 Million) 3. Charter School Administrative Costs ($6.7 Million) 4. K-3 Reading Improvement Program ($15 Million) 5. Educator Salary Adjustment ($ 160 Million) 6. Teacher Salary Supplement Restrict Account ($ 5 Million) 7. Library Books & Electronic Resources ($ 550 K) 8. Matching Fund for School Nurses ($882 K) 9. Critical Languages & Dual Immersion ($2.3 Million) 10.Year-Round Math & Science (USTAR Centers) ($6.2 Million) 11.Early Intervention ($ 7.5 Million) 12.Beverly Taylor Sorenson Arts Learning Program ($2 Million)

Related to Basic Programs (Continued) One-Time Funding Items 1. Teacher Supplies & Materials ($5 Million) 2. Beverly Taylor Sorenson Arts Learning Program ($3 Million)

VOTED AND BOARD LOCAL LEVY PROGRAMS *** Guarantee Rate (per 0.0001 Tax Rate per WPU) $27.92 1. Voted Local Levy Program $319.6 Million *** 2. Board Local Levy Program $97.2 Million *** (Guarantee on.000400 Tax Rate) 3. Board Local Levy Reading Improvement Program $15 Million

Voted & Board Levy Guarantee DISTRICT CACHE NEBO PARK CITY PROVO SOUTH SANPETE Voted and Board Levy Program $ 12,263,331 $ 20,482,987 $ 21,696,863 $ 10,192,647 $ 2,774,136 LOCAL TAX RATE (EFFORT).002490.003267.002375.002818.003445 Local Tax Rate Funded $ 7,726,714 $ 10,374,109 $ 21,696,863 $ 7,906,937 $ 1,125,136 MSP STATE FUNDED $ 4,536,617 $ 10,108,878 N/A $ 2,285,710 $ 1,649,000 Percent State Funded 37% 49% N/A 22% 59% Return On Tax Effort.59.97 N/A.29 1.46 23 Districts Participating Source: USOE -- FY14 Final Summaries

School Building Programs Capital Outlay Programs (Reference: Utah Code 53A-21-101,201,301) 1. Foundation ($12.6 Million) Based on local property tax effort and tax yield per student based on a foundation guaranteed funding level. (12 Districts participating; majority, $10.5 Million, to two districts.) 2. Enrollment Growth ($1.9 Million) Provides funding to school districts experiencing net enrollment increases. ( 21 Districts participating; Funding Range -- $1,500 to $320,177)

GROWTH?? 10,000 Students FY15 8,000 Students FY16

Funding Enrollment Growth (Continued) Each Program is its own Pizza Above the Line Added WPU Funding for New Students Administrative Cost Class Size Reduction CTE Programs NESS Professional Staff Cost Special Education Below the Line Adult Education Board & Voted Local Levy Programs Concurrent Enrollment Dual Language Immersion Early Interventions Educator Salary Adjustments Enhancement for Accelerated Students Enhancement for At-Risk Students Flexible Allocation WPU Distribution Guarantee Transportation Levy K-3 Reading Improvement Program Library Resources Matching Funds for School Nurses Teachers Supplies Transportation (To & From) Youth in Custody

Funding Enrollment Growth (Continued) What Does it Take? 10,000 Students X WPU Value $30 Million For Starters

Funding Enrollment Growth (Continued) FY14 600,000 Students FY15 610,000 Students Enrollment Growth Funding FY15 $61.2 Million

Funding Enrollment Growth (Continued) USOE and LFA have announced Consensus Growth amount to be: $30,057,540 for FY16. This included only above the line programs. Total growth funding estimate -$65 million. 7,291 Students Related to Basic Programs Basic School Programs -------The Line-------

Why is this Important? STATE MINIMUM SCHOOL PROGRAM COMPARISON PROGRAM FY 2015 FY2009 CHANGE WPU VALUE $2,972 / $2726 $2,577 $395 / $149 BASIC SCHOOL PROGRAM $ 2,404,364,100 817,276 WPUs THE LINE $ 1,796,360,735 714,055 WPUs $ 608,003,365 103,221 WPUs ================= ================= ================= RELATED TO BASIC PROGRAMS $ 505,568,800 $ 848,834,146 ($ 343,265,346) SS & Retirement NLF $ 349,906,049 ($ 349,906,049) Flexible WPU Distribution $ 23,106,600 N/A $ 23,106,600 Pupil Transportation $ 71,978,000 $ 74,446,865 ($ 2,468,865) Other Related to Basic $ 410,484,200 $ 424,481,232 ($ 13,997,032) Source: USOE Finance & Statistics

Case Study Ogden School District PROGRAM FY 2015 FY2011 FY 2010 FY2009 CHANGE BASIC SCHOOL PROGRAM WPU VALUE $2,972 / $2726 $2,577 $2,577 $2,577 $395 / $149 $ 46,925,950 $ 41,559,489 $ 41,565,211 $ 40,948,800 $ 5,977,150 THE LINE ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== RELATED TO BASIC PROGRAMS $ 9,838,338 $ 13,525,497 $ 16,326,771 $ 20,521,283 ($10,682,945) SS & Retirement NLF NLF $6,214,535 $8,003,431 ($ 8,003,431) Flexible WPU Distribution $451,151 $3,619,892 N/A N/A $ 451,191 Pupil Transportation $ 838,636 $793,258 $828,917 $906,311 ($67,675) Other Related to Basic $8,548,511 $9,112,347 $9,283,319 $11,611,541 ($ 3,063,030)

Pulling Together, Great Things Can Happen!!!