PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administration

Similar documents
Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Review of Student Assessment Data

Shelters Elementary School

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

AB 167/216 Graduation. kids-alliance.org/programs/education. Alliance for Children s Rights

Pre-AP in Middle School!

African American Male Achievement Update

B.S/M.A in Mathematics

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

Engage Educate Empower

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Evaluation of Teach For America:

A Lesson Study Project: Connecting Theory and Practice Through the Development of an Exemplar Video for Algebra I Teachers and Students

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

International: Three-Year School Improvement Plan to September 2016 (Year 2)

Charity Cayton 3921A Granada Dr, Winterville, NC Phone: (336) ,

Junior Scheduling Assembly. February 22, 2017

2 Any information on the upcoming science test?

Parent Academy. Common Core & PARCC

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

California State University EAP Updates 2016

Bachelor of Science. Undergraduate Program. Department of Physics

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

SER CHANGES~ACCOMMODATIONS PAGES

New Jersey Department of Education

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Kahului Elementary School

Idaho Public Schools

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

FOUR STARS OUT OF FOUR

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Cuero Independent School District

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

School Performance Plan Middle/High Schools

Pathways to College Preparatory Advanced Academic Offerings in the Anchorage School District

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

EAP. updates KHENG WAICHE. early proficiency programs coordinator

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Robert Bennis Elementary School

Native American Education Board Update

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Data Diskette & CD ROM

QUESTIONS and Answers from Chad Rice?

Educational Attainment

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

State of New Jersey

Academic Advising and Career Exploration. PLTW State Conference 2015 Bayless School District

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

Norms For Boston Naming Test And Token Test Neuro Cog

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

World s Best Workforce Plan

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

4 Subgroup scores. 1 Index scores and Trend SPS indictors

FTE General Instructions

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

African American Success Initiative

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Program Elements Definitions and Structure

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

Georgia Department of Education Title I Schoolwide/School Improvement Plan

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

WINSTON CHURCHILL HIGH SCHOOL. 9 th Grade Registration Information

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Transcription:

PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administration East Windsor Regional School District 2018 Measuring College and Career Readiness

New Jersey s Statewide Assessment 2018: Fourth administration of the Partnership for Assessment and readiness for College and Career (PARCC) Students take PARCC Assessments in English Language Arts Literacy in grade 3 11. Students take PARCC Assessments in Mathematics in grades 3-8, Algebra 1, Geometry and Algebra 2.

Performance Levels in PARCC

Comparison of East Windsor Regional School District Spring 2018 PARCC to New Jersey English Language Arts - Percentages Not Yet Meeting Partially Meeting Approaching Meeting Exceeding (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4) (Level 5) > Level 4 Meet or Exceed District State District State District State District State District State District State Grade 3 11.5 13.5 13.8 13.5 20.3 21.4 47.6 43.5 6.8 8.1 54.4 51.7 Grade 4 5.9 7.6 12.4 12.3 18.3 22.1 51.4 39.1 11.9 18.9 63.3 58 Grade 5 6.1 6.9 11.2 12.6 25.5 22.4 51.8 47.2 5.4 10.8 57.2 58 Grade 6 6.1 6.2 12.7 13.6 26.2 24 40.5 41.3 14.6 14.9 55.1 56.2 Grade 7 5.6 8.6 12.2 10.2 19.5 18.5 37.8 34.1 24.9 28.6 62.7 62.7 Grade 8 4.6 8.7 10 11.1 20.3 19.8 42.2 39.9 22.9 20.4 65 60.4 Grade 9 8.8 12.3 11.8 12.5 23.1 21.1 38.2 38 18.1 16.1 56.3 54.1 Grade 10 10.7 18.3 8.5 12.8 20.5 19 42.6 31.8 17.8 18.1 60.4 49.9

COMPARISON OF EAST WINDSOR REGIONAL SPRING 2015 2018 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY - PERCENTAGES Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) Meeting (Level 4) Exceeding (Level 5) Grade 2015 2016 2017 2018 2015 2016 2017 2018 2015 2016 2017 2018 2015 2016 2017 2018 2015 2016 2017 2018 Change in Level 1 and Level 2 From 2015 to 2018 Change in Level 4 and Level 5 From 2015 to 2018** 3 12 15 11 11.5 18 17 15 13.8 27 25 32 20.3 41 40 38 47.6 2 3 4 6.8-4.7 11.4 4 8 5 6 5.9 14 12 17 12.4 25 28 28 18.3 42 47 41 51.4 10 8 7 11.9-3.7 11.3 5 3 4 4 6.1 15 14 10 11.2 27 27 22 25.5 52 51 55 51.8 4 4 9 5.4-0.7 1.2 6 6 5 3 6.1 14 8 11 12.7 26 26 26 26.2 44 48 50 40.5 11 14 10 14.6-1.2 0.1 7 5 6 7 5.6 13 12 9 12.2 25 19 20 19.5 39 39 42 37.8 18 24 22 24.9-0.2 5.7 8 6 3 7 4.6 9 6 9 10 24 21 22 20.3 45 55 42 42.2 16 16 20 22.9-0.4 4.1 9 13 6 9 8.8 22 10 7 11.8 24 27 29 23.1 29 40 42 38.2 12 17 13 18.1-14.4 15.3 10 15 14 10 10.7 11 16 11 8.5 19 25 24 20.5 36 33 38 42.6 19 12 17 17.8-6.8 5.4 **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready

East Windsor Regional School District Spring 2018 PARCC English Language Arts - Percentages by Level Partially Not Yet Meeting Meeting Approaching Meeting Exceeding (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4) (Level 5) > Level 4 Meet or Exceed Grade 9 8.8% 11.8% 23.1% 38.2% 18.1% 56.3% Honors 0% 0% 3% 40% 57% 97% Academic 1% 7% 30% 56% 6% 62% Standard 9% 33% 52% 6% 0% 6% Grade 10 10.7% 8.5% 20.5% 42.6% 17.8% 60.4% Honors 1% 2% 5% 44% 48% 92% Academic 2% 7% 28% 58% 6% 64% Standard 18% 23% 43% 18% 0% 18% Grade 11 16.1% 20.1% 29.5% 27.2% 7.1% 34.4% Honors 3% 8% 20% 45% 25% 70% * Academic 10% 16% 37% 36% 1% 37% Standard 155 39% 42% 3% 0% 3% * 11th graders have the opportunity to take AP and Dual enrollment courses

Students in district less than 3 years (as of June 2018) ELA Grade total total taking Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Did Not Take % scoring >4 11 73 53 12 22.6% 15 28.3% 11 20.8% 12 22.6% 3 5.7% 20 27.4% 28.3% 10 78 67 23 34.3% 6 9.0% 12 17.9% 19 28.4% 7 10.4% 11 14.1% 38.8% 9 85 79 23 29.1% 13 16.5% 22 27.8% 16 20.3% 5 6.3% 6 7.1% 26.6% 8 65 52 7 13.5% 7 13.5% 19 36.5% 15 28.8% 4 7.7% 13 20.0% 36.5% 7 69 58 10 17.2% 10 17.2% 8 13.8% 20 34.5% 10 17.2% 11 15.9% 51.7% 6 66 55 5 9.1% 8 14.5% 14 25.5% 26 47.3% 2 3.6% 11 16.7% 50.9% 5 60 55 4 7.3% 6 10.9% 15 27.3% 29 52.7% 1 1.8% 5 8.3% 54.5% 4 64 55 2 3.6% 9 16.4% 14 25.5% 27 49.1% 3 5.5% 9 14.1% 54.5%

Comparison of Students in District More/Less than 3 years

COMPARISON OF EAST WINDSOR REGIONAL 2015 TO 2018 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS TO NEW JERSEY ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY % Change in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5 2015 2018 4 year change 2015 2018 4 year change EWRSD State EWRSD State EWRSD State EWRSD State EWRSD State EWRSD State Grade 3 30% 33% 25% 27% -5 % -6 % 43% 44% 54% 52% 11 % 8 % Grade 4 22% 23% 18% 20% -4 % -3 % 52% 51% 63% 58% 11 % 7 % Grade 5 18% 22% 17% 20% -1 % -2 % 56% 51% 57% 58% 1 % 7 % Grade 6 20% 24% 19% 20% -1 % -4 % 55% 49% 55% 56% 0 % 7 % Grade 7 18% 25% 18% 19% 0 % -6 % 57% 52% 63% 63% 6 % 11 % Grade 8 15% 27% 15% 20% 0 % -7 % 61% 51% 65% 60% 4 % 9 % Grade 9 35% 37% 21% 25% -14 % -12 % 41% 39% 56% 54% 15 % 15 % Grade 10 26% 44% 20% 31% -6 % -13 % 55% 36% 60% 50% 5 % 14 %

PARCC ELA Spring 2018 Subgroup Comparisons (Achievement Gap) Not Yet Meeting Partially Meeting Approaching Meeting Exceeding % scoring Level 1 or 2 % scoring > 4 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Level 4 (Level 5) Total # students Hispanic 930 118 12.7% 172 18.5% 257 27.6% 350 37.6% 43 0.5% 31.2% 38.1% Asian 383 5 1.3% 24 6.3% 45 11.7% 195 50.9% 114 29.8% 7.6% 80.7% African American 229 13 5.7% 34 14.8% 48 21.0% 113 49.3% 21 9.2% 20.5% 58.5% White 701 15 2.1% 41 5.8% 136 19.4% 361 51.5% 148 21.1% 8.0% 72.6% 42.6% gap among Hispanic and Asian students NON ED 1450 45 3.1% 102 7.0% 270 18.6% 737 50.8% 296 20.4% 10.1% 71.2% ED 849 106 12.5% 404 47.6% 220 25.9% 304 35.8% 36 4.2% 60.1% 40.0% 31.2% gap between ED and Non ED SWD 256 71 27.7% 76 29.7% 70 27.3% 37 14.5% 12 4.7% 57.4% 19.1% LEP 162 53 32.7% 60 37.0% 30 18.5% 19 11.7% 0 0.0% 69.8% 11.7%

District-wide Foundational Literacy 2017-18 PARCC Achievement Level of Students with 1 or 2 on 2016-17 PARCC Measure Progress toward goals Apples to Apples comparison 510 students scored at Level 1 or 2 in 2016-17 2017-18 More than 41% of these students increased at least one level

Grades 5 & 8 Foundational Literacy 2017-18 PARCC Achievement Level of Students with 1 or 2 on 2016-17 PARCC Measure Progress toward goals Apples to Apples comparison 69/86 students increased at least one level 41/53 students increased at least one level 2017-18

Comparison of East Windsor Regional School District Spring 2018 PARCC to New Jersey Mathematics - Percentages Not Yet Meeting Partially Meeting Approaching Meeting Exceeding (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4) (Level 5) > Level 4 Meet or Exceed District State District State District State District State District State District State 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 Grade 3 6.1 8 10.8 15.3 23.3 23.7 41 37.8 18.8 15.2 59.8 53 Grade 4 4.6 7.5 14.6 16.8 28.4 26.3 45 41.8 7.4 7.6 52.4 49.4 Grade 5 4.8 7.5 14.8 17 26.6 26.7 43.8 38.5 9.9 10.4 53.8 48.8 Grade 6 7.8 8.5 21.9 20.1 30.5 27.9 30.5 35.6 9.2 8 39.7 43.5 Grade 7 7.6 7.7 25.8 20.3 37.1 28.6 28.8 36 0.7 7.4 29.5 43.4 Grade 8 20.7 22 26.4 22.7 32.7 27.1 20.2 27.2 0 1 20.2 28.2 Algebra 1 10 11.3 14.7 18.6 22 24.3 50.2 29.3 3.1 6.5 53.3 45.8 Algebra 7 0 0 2 84 14 98 Algebra 8 0 0 6 93 1 94 Algebra HS 17 26 36 21 0 21 Geometry 4.4 9.4 28.5 31.5 33.1 29.6 30 24.6 4.1 4.9 34.1 29.5 Geometry MS 0 0 6 76 18 94 Geometry HS 5 36 40 17 1 18 Algebra 2 23.4 31 14.9 22.4 20.8 18 35.4 24.6 5.5 4 40.9 28.6

COMPARISON OF EAST WINDSOR REGIONAL SPRING 2015 2018 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS Mathematics- PERCENTAGES Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching (Level 3) Meeting (Level 4) Exceeding (Level 5) Grade 2015 2016 2017 2018 2015 2016 2017 2018 2015 2016 2017 2018 2015 2016 2017 2018 2015 2016 2017 2018 Change Change in Level in Level 1 and 4 and Level 2 Level 5 From From 2015 to 2015 to 2018 2018** 3 6 6 5 6.1 17 16 19 10.8 27 28 29 23.3 41 39 37 41 9 11 10 18.8-6.1 9.8 4 6 5 8 4.6 20 17 19 14.6 26 26 27 28.4 42 46 38 45 6 6 7 7.4-6.8 4.4 5 2 2 6 4.8 17 18 11 14.8 25 28 28 26.6 43 40 44 43.8 13 12 11 9.9 0.6-2.3 6 7 6 7 7.8 20 16 15 21.9 23 30 35 30.5 41 36 35 30.5 9 13 9 9.2 2.7-10.3 7* 5 9 7 7.6 25 30 23 25.8 44 41 39 37.1 25 21 31 28.8 0 0 0 0.7 3.4 4.5 8* 14 16 23 20.7 21 27 27 26.4 37 36 34 32.7 28 21 16 20.2 0 0 0 0 12.1-7.8 ALG I 12 9 10 10 24 21 20 14.7 23 21 28 22 39 47 40 50.2 2 3 2 3.1-11.3 12.3 GEO 3 8 6 4.4 27 32 22 28.5 35 30 31 33.1 30 25 36 30 5 4 6 4.1 2.9-0.9 ALG II 22 25 27 23.4 23 25 24 14.9 20 21 18 20.8 34 28 29 35.4 1 1 2 5.5-6.7 5.9 **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready

East Windsor Regional School District Spring 2018 PARCC Mathematics Percentages by Level Not Yet Meeting Partially Meeting Approaching Meeting Exceeding (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) (Level 4) (Level 5) > Level 4 Meet or Exceed Algebra HS 17% 26% 36% 21% 0% 22% Honors 0% 0% 19% 81% 0% 81% Academic 1% 12% 58% 28% 0% 28% Standard 18% 48% 25% 0% 0% 0% Geometry HS 5% 36% 40% 17% 1% 19% Honors 0% 10% 48% 41% 1% 42% Academic 4% 40% 46% 8% 1% 9% Standard 13% 71% 17% 0% 0% 0% Algebra 2 23.4% 14.9% 20.8% 35.4% 5.5% 42% Honors 1% 5% 12% 70% 13% 83% Academic 17% 23% 43% 17% 0% 17% Standard 65% 35% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Students in district less than 3 years (as of June 2018) Math Grade total # take n Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Did Not Take % scoring >4 11 73 41 10 78 66 9 85 79 8 65 57 7 69 65 6 66 61 5 60 57 4 64 59 12 29.3% 19 46.3% 6 14.6% 4 9.8% 0 0.0% 32 43.8% 9.8%** 11 16.7% 28 42.4% 17 25.8% 9 13.6% 1 1.5% 12 15.4% 15.2% 14 17.7% 23 29.1% 22 27.8% 19 24.1% 1 1.3% 6 7.1% 25.3% 12 21.1% 15 26.3% 11 19.3% 19 33.3% 0 0.0% 8 12.3% 33.3% 10 15.4% 17 26.2% 20 30.8% 17 26.2% 1 1.5% 4 5.8% 27.7% 6 9.8% 21 34.4% 18 29.5% 14 23.0% 2 3.3% 5 7.6% 26.2% 4 7.0% 11 19.3% 17 29.8% 24 42.1% 1 1.8% 3 5.0% 43.9% 4 6.8% 13 22.0% 17 28.8% 23 39.0% 2 3.4% 5 7.8% 42.4%

Comparison of Students in District More/Less than 3 years Students in district more than 3 years, are 4.5 times as likely to be proficient on the PARCC assessment in Math than those with less than 3 years.

COMPARISON OF EAST WINDSOR REGIONAL 2015 TO 2018 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS TO NEW JERSEY Mathematics % Change in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5 2015 2018 4 year change 2015 2018 4 year change EWRSD State EWRSD State EWRSD State EWRSD State EWRSD State EWRSD State Grade 3 23% 26% 17% 23% -6% -3% 50% 45% 60% 53% 10% 8% Grade 4 26% 29% 20% 25% -6% -4% 48% 40% 52% 49% 4% 9% Grade 5 19% 27% 20% 25% 1% -2% 56% 41% 54% 49% -2% 8% Grade 6 27% 29% 30% 29% 3% 0% 50% 41% 40% 44% -10% 3% Grade 7 30% 30% 34% 28% 4% -2% 25% 37% 30% 43% 5% 6% Grade 8 35% 48% 47% 45% 12% -3% 28% 24% 20% 28% -8% 4% Algebra 1 36% 39% 25% 30% -11% -9% 41% 36% 53% 46% 12% 10% Algebra 2 45% 57% 28% 53% -17% -4% 35% 24% 41% 29% 6% 5% Geometry 30% 48% 33% 41% 3% -7% 35% 23% 34% 30% -1% 7%

USING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA AT EWRSD PARCC DATA IS USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH LOCAL ASSESSMENTS AND STUDENT WORK PRODUCT TO: Measure student progress Make sure students don t fall through the cracks Measure progress toward goals Measure program effectiveness Assess instructional effectiveness Guide curriculum development Allocate resources wisely Promote accountability Meet state and federal reporting requirements Maintain educational focus Show trends (but not necessarily solutions) 21

Measure student progress Make sure students don t fall through the cracks Every student s PARCC score is compared with norm based local assessments Count Current Grade State/Local by Subject PARCC - ELA Scale Score 2017-2018 STAR Assessments STAR Reading Grade Equivalent - May 2017-2018 89 3 45% 55% 0% 0% 0% 20% 28% 40% 11% 0% 0% 0% 69 4 30% 70% 0% 0% 0% 32% 35% 30% 3% 0% 0% 0% 71 5 35% 65% 0% 0% 0% 66% 25% 6% 3% 0% 0% 0% 229 Students tested at a Level 1 or Level 2 - (Significantly below literacy level) 15 of these students tested on grade level on local assessments 62 additional students tested within one year of grade level

SUMMARY STRENGTHS AREAS OF CONCERN 23

STRENGTHS LANGUAGE ARTS - Cohort Growth 43% of General Education students who tested at level 3 (the middle) in 2015-16 tested at 4 or 5 in 2017-18. 23% of Special Education students who tested at level 3 (the middle) in 2015-16 tested at 4 or 5 in 2017-18. 35% of General Education students who tested at level 1 & 2 in 2015-16 tested at 3 or 4 in 2017-18. 26% of Special Education students who tested at level 1 & 2 in 2015-16 tested at 3 or 4 in 2017-18. 24

STRENGTHS Mathematics (not advanced Math) - Cohort Growth 31% of General Education students who tested at level 3 (the middle) in 2015-16 tested at 4 or 5 in 2017-18. 16% of Special Education students who tested at level 3 (the middle) in 2015-16 tested at 4 or 5 in 2017-18. 38% of General Education students who tested at level 1 & 2 in 2015-16 tested at 3 or 4 in 2017-18. 14% of Special Education students who tested at level 1 & 2 in 2015-16 tested at 3 or 4 in 2017-18. Approximately 96% of students in our Accelerated Mathematics Program are meeting or exceeding expectations on PARCC Test as well as universal screening assessments. 25

Growth 2017-18 PARCC GRADES 3 / 4 Grade Level 2017 Met or Exceeded Mathematics (2017) EWRSD State (2017) Diff Grade 3 (47 %) 60% 53 % (-6) 7 Grade 4 (45 %) 52% 49 % (-3) 3 Grade Level 2017 Met or Exceeded Language Arts (2017) EWRSD State (2017) Diff Grade 3 (42 %) 54% 52% (-8) 2 Grade 4 (48 %) 63% 58% (-7) 5 *Last year, this was an area of concern. 26

AREAS OF CONCERN SUPPORTING TRANSIENT POPULATION: English Language Arts Only 45% of students transferring into the district in past 3 years tested proficient on PARCC ELA compared to 61% of students who have been in district more than 3 years. 31% of students transferring into the district in past 3 years scored at a 1 or 2 on PARCC ELA compared to 17% of students who have been in district more than 3 years. GRADE 6 PROFICIENCY: Grade 6 proficiency levels in both mathematics and language arts are testing below state levels. 27

AREAS OF CONCERN SUPPORTING TRANSIENT POPULATION: Mathematics Only 10% of students transferring into the district in past 3 years tested proficient on PARCC Math compared to 46% of students who have been in district more than 3 years. 76% of students transferring into the district in past 3 years scored at a 1 or 2 on PARCC Math compared to 31% of students who have been in district more than 3 years. 28

STOP HERE QUESTIONS???? 29