Willmar, MN Public School District

Similar documents
Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Fruitvale Station Shopping Center > Retail

Transportation Equity Analysis

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Educational Attainment

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Shelters Elementary School

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Review of Student Assessment Data

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

John F. Kennedy Middle School

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Kahului Elementary School

BARUCH RANKINGS: *Named Standout Institution by the

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Effectiveness of McGraw-Hill s Treasures Reading Program in Grades 3 5. October 21, Research Conducted by Empirical Education Inc.

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

YOUR FUTURE IN IB. Why is the International Baccalaureate a great choice for you? Mrs. Debbie Woolard IB Director Marietta High School

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Idaho Public Schools

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Executive Summary. Hialeah Gardens High School

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

Network Technology/Cisco and Linux Networking Education Report. 5, % $27.63/hr

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Organization Profile

Unequal Opportunity in Environmental Education: Environmental Education Programs and Funding at Contra Costa Secondary Schools.

Executive Summary. Gautier High School

Mission, Vision and Values Providing a Context

World s Best Workforce Plan

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Trends & Issues Report

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Best Colleges Main Survey

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Clark Lane Middle School

HIGH SCHOOL PREP PROGRAM APPLICATION For students currently in 7th grade

Denver Public Schools

El Toro Elementary School

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Lied Scottsbluff Public Library Strategic Plan

State of New Jersey

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

VISUALIZING SUCCESS PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE PUBLIC FORUM DECEMBER 17, 2013

Raw Data Files Instructions

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Spanish Users and Their Participation in College: The Case of Indiana

Access Center Assessment Report

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY


UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

2/3 9.8% 38% $0.78. The Status of Women in Missouri: 2016 ARE WOMEN 51% 22% A Comprehensive Report of Leading Indicators and Findings.

The Racial Wealth Gap

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

Rural Education in Oregon

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

DIRECT CERTIFICATION AND THE COMMUNITY ELIGIBILITY PROVISION (CEP) HOW DO THEY WORK?

46 Children s Defense Fund

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

AMERICA READS*COUNTS PROGRAM EVALUATION. School Year

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Transcription:

Willmar, MN Public School District Elementary Boundary Change Model 2A-1: October 2016 Report created by TeamWorks International, Inc 7037 20th Avenue S. Centerville, MN 55038 (651) 429-7340 www.teamworksintl.net

1 INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY The following analysis presents one possible scenario that adds an additional elementary attendance area within the Willmar Public School District. The goals of this model were to add a new elementary attendance boundary into the current 2- boundary system. to create relative balance and stability in regards to total enrollment and facility capacity for the perceivable future. Appendix 3 presents 3 tables that represent a breakdown of income, free or reduced lunch, special education, and MCA testing results by race for each school in the model 1 design. Here again, those students are assigned to each school based on the elementary attendance area in which they reside. Further, Asian and American Indian students were excluded due to the fact that they represent such a small demographic. Map 1 shows the current elementary attendance area configuration. Map 2 shows the modeled elementary attendance area configuration. Appendix 1 gives historical and projected enrollment figures if the elementary attendance boundary changes in this model were in place. This model assumes that these changes will take place beginning in school-year 2016-2017. Appendix 2 presents four tables. The first shows the socioeconomic breakdown of those students enrolled at the two elementary schools (current design). The second table shows the results of the MCA II math and reading scores for the current design. Tables three and four show the same information, but for model 1 design. Here, those students are assigned to each school based on the elementary attendance area in which they reside.

2 Map 1: Willmar, MN Public School District Current Design

3 Map 2: Willmar, MN Public School District Current Design

4 APPENDIX 1

5 ` KENNEDY ELEMENTARY: HISTORICAL & PROJECTED STUDENT ENROLLMENT Historical Enrollment Projected Enrollment Grade 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 K 165 139 167 166 112 147 130 106 82 95 95 104 1 168 154 155 167 165 126 144 108 109 84 98 97 2 159 158 156 153 160 165 119 113 104 105 82 95 3 159 147 165 159 151 148 158 93 110 102 103 79 4 150 150 144 163 152 148 148 114 94 111 103 104 5 128 142 158 147 160 165 151 113 115 95 112 104 929 890 945 955 900 899 850 646 614 592 592 584 ` ROOSEVELT ELEMENTARY: HISTORICAL & PROJECTED STUDENT ENROLLMENT Historical Enrollment Projected Enrollment Grade 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 K 143 162 149 145 166 170 161 93 72 83 83 91 1 156 150 163 161 161 157 178 94 95 73 86 85 2 130 155 156 176 159 154 147 99 91 92 72 84 3 151 130 157 155 172 150 157 82 96 89 90 69 4 145 158 136 159 143 171 164 100 83 97 90 91 5 151 143 153 138 149 139 175 99 101 83 98 91 876 898 914 934 950 941 982 567 538 519 519 512 ` ` NEW ELEMENTARY: PROJECTED STUDENT ENROLLMENT Projected Enrollment Grade 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 K 96 74 86 85 94 1 97 98 76 88 88 2 102 94 95 74 86 3 84 99 92 93 71 4 103 85 100 93 94 5 102 104 86 101 94 584 555 535 535 527

6 APPENDIX 2

7 SOCIOECONOMIC SUMMARY: CURRENT DESIGN School Students White Black Asian Hispanic Am. Indian Free or Reduced Lunch Special Education Avg. Median H.H. Income Kennedy Elementary 872 39.2% 18.2% 2.3% 39.0% 1.3% 68.8% 10.2% $44,804 Roosevelt Elementary 996 43.1% 17.4% 1.0% 37.4% 1.1% 64.5% 7.1% $41,576 s 1,868 41.3% 17.8% 1.6% 38.2% 1.2% 66.5% 8.6% $43,083 LEARNING SUMMARY: CURRENT DESIGN School MCA MCA Kennedy Elementary 435 66.0% 34.0% 440 53.2% 46.8% Roosevelt Elementary 457 61.7% 38.3% 457 48.8% 51.2% s 892 63.8% 36.2% 897 50.9% 49.1% *Students that partially meets standards in MCA and are included in the category SOCIOECONOMIC SUMMARY: MODEL 2A-1 School Students White Black Asian Hispanic Am. Indian Free or Reduced Lunch Special Education Avg. Median H.H. Income New Elementary 607 38.7% 18.5% 0.7% 40.5% 1.6% 69.5% 8.4% $38,106 Kennedy Elementary 672 39.7% 15.5% 1.6% 42.6% 0.6% 66.5% 8.8% $43,322 Roosevelt Elementary 589 45.7% 19.7% 2.5% 30.7% 1.4% 63.3% 8.5% $47,938 s 1,868 41.3% 17.8% 1.6% 38.2% 1.2% 66.5% 8.6% $43,083 LEARNING SUMMARY:MODEL 2A-1 School MCA MCA New Elementary 263 59.7% 40.3% 265 46.8% 53.2% Kennedy Elementary 335 61.8% 38.2% 335 51.3% 48.7% Roosevelt Elementary 294 69.7% 30.3% 297 54.2% 45.8% s 892 63.8% 36.2% 897 50.9% 49.1% *Students that partially meets standards in MCA and are included in the category

8 APPENDIX 3

9 Racial Breakdown for Kennedy Elementary: Model 2A-1 Race Percent of Avg. Household Income Free or Reduced Lunch Special Education MCA MCA White 41.1% $51,052 33.5% 9.6% 145 81.4% 18.6% 149 67.1% 32.9% Black 15.9% $36,192 94.3% 4.8% 47 25.5% 74.5% 42 28.6% 71.4% Hispanic 43.0% $38,454 85.6% 10.6% 136 54.4% 45.6% 138 42.0% 58.0% s 100.0% $43,278.6 65.5% 9.2% 328 62.0% 37.8% 329 51.7% 48.3% *Asian and American Indians are not included due to low enrollment numbers **Students that partially meets standards in MCA and are included in the category Racial Breakdown for New Elementary: Model 2A-1 Race Percent of Avg. Household Income Free or Reduced Lunch Special Education MCA MCA White 40.5% $45,458 35.8% 11.0% 107 80.4% 19.6% 110 65.5% 34.5% Black 18.2% $32,382 98.0% 6.1% 38 23.7% 76.3% 36 11.1% 88.9% Hispanic 41.3% $35,635 87.8% 11.7% 109 52.3% 47.7% 110 38.2% 61.8% s 100.0% $39,022.5 68.6% 10.4% 254 59.4% 40.2% 256 46.1% 53.9% *Asian and American Indians are not included due to low enrollment numbers **Students that partially meets standards in MCA and are included in the category Racial Breakdown for Roosevelt Elementary: Model 2B-1 Race Percent of Avg. Household Income Free or Reduced Lunch Special Education MCA MCA White 47.3% $54,131 26.2% 5.9% 145 87.6% 12.4% 146 76.0% 24.0% Black 20.5% $38,148 99.1% 4.5% 51 49.0% 51.0% 52 19.2% 80.8% Hispanic 32.2% $48,252 87.9% 14.4% 90 53.3% 46.7% 91 38.5% 61.5% s 100.0% $48,960.9 61.0% 8.3% 286 69.2% 30.1% 289 54.0% 46.0% *Asian and American Indians are not included due to low enrollment numbers **Students that partially meets standards in MCA and are included in the category