Pioneer Magnet School for the Visual and Performing Arts

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Engage Educate Empower

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Val Verde Unified School District

Shelters Elementary School

Hokulani Elementary School

Kahului Elementary School

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Val Verde Unified School District

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

CDS Code

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan


Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Clark Lane Middle School

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

12-month Enrollment

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Long Beach Unified School District

World s Best Workforce Plan

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

University of Arizona

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

ÉCOLE MANACHABAN MIDDLE SCHOOL School Education Plan May, 2017 Year Three

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

AMERICA READS*COUNTS PROGRAM EVALUATION. School Year

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Cuero Independent School District

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

CURRENT POSITION: Angelo State University, San Angelo, Texas

Educational Attainment

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

STUDENT APPLICATION FORM 2016

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

International: Three-Year School Improvement Plan to September 2016 (Year 2)

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Transcription:

Pioneer Magnet School for the Visual and Performing Arts California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2016-17 School Year By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners). Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. Laurie Carson, Principal Principal, Pioneer Magnet School for the Visual and Performing Arts About Our School About Our School Contact Pioneer Magnet School for the Visual and Performing Arts 24625 Highway 88 Pioneer, CA 95666 Phone: 209-295-6500 E-mail: lcarson@amadorcoe.k12.ca.us

About This School Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) District Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) School Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) District Name Amador County Unified School Name Performing Arts Pioneer Magnet School for the Visual and Phone Number (209) 223-1750 Street 24625 Highway 88 Superintendent E-mail Address Amy Slavensky aslavensky@amadorcoe.k12.ca.us City, State, Zip Pioneer, Ca, 95666 Phone Number 209-295-6500 Web Site http://www.amadorcoe.org Principal Laurie Carson, Principal E-mail Address lcarson@amadorcoe.k12.ca.us County-District-School (CDS) Code 03739816002851 School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2017-18) School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2017-18) The mission of the Pioneer Visual and Performing Arts Magnet School is to provide students an environment that is emotionally and physically safe, an environment that provides healthy opportunities for intense emotional expression, such as theatre arts and music, an environment that encourages students to sharpen their intellectual skills, an environment that introduces students to their rich intellectual and artistic human heritage, and an environment in which they are respected in all ways. It is the mission of this school to provide such environments in the classroom through exploring core curriculum through visual and performance arts mediums. We will strive to provide an educational program that is intellectually stimulating, emotionally compelling, aesthetically enriching and personally relevant with a strong emphasis on community building and responsible citizenship. Extracurricular classes are taught by our staff and we provide clinics for students struggling in math and reading. Enrichment opportunities are also offered, such as yoga and drama. The community at large is very involved in our school and we have a direct partnership with the Bank of Amador and Payless/IGA Market. These two local businesses support and participate in a Night Out for Pioneer event which raises funds for our school. Our local Lions Club, Masonic Lodge and the Upcountry Rotary Club provide and support special events at our site, including the "Books for Bikes" event. Page 2 of 17

Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2016-17) Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2016-17) Grade Level Number of Students Kindergarten 19 Grade 1 32 Grade 2 25 Grade 3 27 Grade 4 20 Grade 5 29 Grade 6 30 Total Enrollment 182 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2016-17) Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2016-17) Last updated: 1/16/2018 Student Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American 1.1 % American Indian or Alaska Native 2.7 % Asian 0.5 % Filipino 1.6 % Hispanic or Latino 16.5 % Last updated: 1/16/2018 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.0 % White 69.2 % Two or More Races 7.7 % Other 0.7 % Student Group (Other) Percent of Total Enrollment Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 59.9 % English Learners 1.1 % Students with Disabilities 13.7 % Foster Youth 0.5 % Page 3 of 17

A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair Teacher Credentials Teacher Credentials Teachers School District 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2017-18 With Full Credential 9 10 9 171 Without Full Credential 0 0 0 6 Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0 0 0 6 12 10 8 6 Teachers with Full Credential Teachers without Full Credential Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 4 2 0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Last updated: 1/16/2018 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Indicator Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 0 0 0 1.0 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments Vacant Teacher Positions Total Teacher Misassignments* 0 0 0 0.5 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 0 0.0-0.5-1.0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Last updated: 1/13/2018 Page 4 of 17

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2017-18) Year and month in which the data were collected: January 2018 Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/year of Adoption From Most Recent Adoption? Percent Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy Reading/Language Arts Benchmark Advanced: Benchmark Education Yes 0.0 % Mathematics McGraw Hill: My Math Yes 0.0 % Science MacMillan/McGraw Hill: California Science Yes 0.0 % History-Social Science Harcourt: Reflections (Grades K-5) Yes 0.0 % Foreign Language 0.0 % Health 0.0 % Visual and Performing Arts 0.0 % Science Lab Eqpmt (Grades 9-12) Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. N/A N/A 0.0 % Page 5 of 17

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements Pioneer Elementary School's buildings and 14 classrooms are cleaned and maintained on a regular basis by the school's custodians and the district maintenance department. The custodians and Principal walk through the restrooms during the day to assure that they are sanitary and in proper working condition. The principal walks the site daily to look for hazards and, if found, they are addressed immediately. School Facility Good Repair Status Year and month of the most recent FIT report: November 2017 System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/Doors/Gates/Fences Rating Good Fair Good Good Good Good Good Good Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned Overall Facility Rate Year and month of the most recent FIT report: November 2017 Overall Rating Good Page 6 of 17

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for students in the general education population and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] and mathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. Only eligible students may participate in the administration of the CAAs. CAAs items are aligned with alternate achievement standards, which are linked with the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities); and The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. CAASPP Test Results in ELA and Mathematics for All Students CAASPP Test Results in ELA and Mathematics for All Students Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards School District State Subject 2015-16 2016-17 2015-16 2016-17 2015-16 2016-17 English Language Arts / Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) 53% 53% 42% 46% 48% 48% Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11) 37% 41% 28% 32% 36% 37% Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Page 7 of 17

CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 108 108 100.00% 52.78% Male 52 52 100.00% 53.85% Female 56 56 100.00% 51.79% Black or African American -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 24 24 100.00% 45.83% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White 65 65 100.00% 52.31% Two or More Races -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 60 60 100.00% 40.00% English Learners -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 18 18 100.00% -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 8 of 17

CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 108 108 100.00% 40.74% Male 52 52 100.00% 46.15% Female 56 56 100.00% 35.71% Black or African American -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 24 24 100.00% 37.50% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander White 65 65 100.00% 41.54% Two or More Races -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 60 60 100.00% 26.67% English Learners -- -- -- Students with Disabilities 18 18 100.00% -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Page 9 of 17

CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students Grades Five, Eight and Ten Grades Five, Eight and Ten Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced School District State Subject 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 48.0% 72.0% 61.0% 58.0% 56% 54% Note: Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) in grades five, eight, and ten. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note:The 2016-17 data are not available. The California Department of Education is developing a new science assessment based on the Next Generation Science Standards for California Public Schools (CA NGSS). The new California Science Test (CAST) was piloted in spring 2017. The CST and CMA for Science will no longer be administered. Page 10 of 17

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8): Pupil outcomes in the subject area of physical education California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2016-17) California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2016-17) Percentage of Students Meeting Fitness Standards Grade Level Four of Six Fitness Standards Five of Six Fitness Standards Six of Six Fitness Standards 5 23.3% 16.7% 33.3% Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Page 11 of 17

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2017-18) Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2017-18) Parent and community involvement at Pioneer Elementary School is highly valued by staff. Parents volunteer in their childrens' classrooms, in the library, the office and in many other ways. Two parent groups provide continuous and valuable support to the school; the School Site Council and the parent/teacher organization, "PPTO". This parent led group is very active and facilitates several fundraisers throughout the year, such as movie nights, Night Out For Pioneer, cookie dough sales and the Walk/JogaThon. The fundraisers help support our P.E.Program, art lessons with Marchand Heimann, Drama productions, teacher training, and whole school assemblies. Our School Site Council meets once a month and makes important decisions about how we spend the State and federal funds we receive. A third parent group was started in 2014-2015 to head up our annual trip to Science Camp. This group oversees fundraisers and activities that directly support the following year s Science Camp trip. State Priority: Pupil Engagement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Engagement (Priority 5): High school dropout rates; and High school graduation rates Page 12 of 17

State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety Suspensions and Expulsions Suspensions and Expulsions School District State Rate 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Suspensions 4.5% 5.9% 5.7% 6.1% 7.0% 6.5% 3.8% 3.7% 3.7% Expulsions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% Suspensions Expulsions 8 7 School Suspensions District Suspensions State Suspensions 0.12 0.10 School Expulsions District Expulsions State Expulsions 6 5 0.08 4 0.06 3 0.04 2 1 0.02 0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 0.00 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 School Safety Plan (School Year 2017-18) Pioneer Elementary School strives to maintain a safe, healthful and orderly school campus that encourages a positive attitude among our staff and students. A sixth grade leadership group has been formed that provides peer leadership and guidance for our younger students. Our School Safety Plan includes information and procedures for emergency situations and is reviewed annually. We conduct monthly fire drills, quarterly earthquake drills, and lock down drills twice a year. Any safety hazard is reported and reviewed immediately and steps are taken to correct the hazard. Time is scheduled at each staff meeting to discuss safety issues. Page 13 of 17

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2017-18) Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2017-18) Indicator School District Program Improvement Status In PI In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2013-2014 2011-2012 Year in Program Improvement Year 1 Year 3 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 4 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 66.7% Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Grade Level Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ K 26.0 0 1 0 20.0 1 1 0 19.0 1 0 0 1 25.0 0 1 0 21.0 0 1 0 16.0 2 0 0 2 27.0 0 1 0 24.0 0 1 0 18.0 1 0 0 3 22.0 0 1 0 27.0 0 1 0 17.0 2 0 0 4 21.0 1 1 0 21.0 0 1 0 20.0 1 0 0 5 26.0 0 1 0 20.0 1 1 0 18.0 1 0 0 6 16.0 2 0 0 24.0 0 1 0 21.0 1 1 0 Other 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 * Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class). Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2016-17) Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor Academic Counselor 0.0 0.0 Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) 0.3 N/A Library Media Teacher (Librarian) 0.0 N/A Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) 0.8 N/A Psychologist 0.2 N/A Social Worker 0.0 N/A Nurse 0.1 N/A Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 0.2 N/A Resource Specialist (non-teaching) 0.0 N/A Other 0.2 N/A Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Page 14 of 17

*One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Level Total Expenditures Per Pupil Expenditures Per Pupil (Restricted) Expenditures Per Pupil (Unrestricted) Average Teacher Salary School Site $6132.4 $830.2 $5302.2 $61021.0 District N/A N/A $0.0 $66716.0 Percent Difference School Site and District N/A N/A 200.0% -8.9% State N/A N/A $6574.0 $69649.0 Percent Difference School Site and State N/A N/A -21.4% -13.2% Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Last updated: 1/17/2018 Page 15 of 17

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2016-17) Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2016-17) We have recented converted to a Visual and Performing Arts Magnet school. We offer a rich range of classes and integrate arts throughout the curriculum. We have after school tutoring for our at risk students, participate in Nature Bowl and other programs for both our gifted and at risk students. We are working with the district, through the LCAP process, to continue increasing our program and enriching our school environment for our students. Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $43,569 $44,144 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $62,791 $69,119 Highest Teacher Salary $82,712 $86,005 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $87,252 $106,785 Average Principal Salary (Middle) $76,319 $111,569 Average Principal Salary (High) $98,603 $121,395 Superintendent Salary $144,077 $178,104 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 32.0% 34.0% Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 6.0% 6.0% For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Teacher Salary Chart Principal Salary Chart 90000 120000 80000 70000 60000 100000 80000 50000 60000 40000 30000 40000 20000 20000 10000 0 Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary 0 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) Average Principal Salary (Middle) Average Principal Salary (High) Professional Development 16/17: 4.5 days 15/16 4.5 days 14/15 4.5 days Page 16 of 17

In the 16/17 school year, we had a total of 4.5 days in the Amador County Schools calendar set aside for professional development and continuous professional growth. The areas of focus for these 4.5 days were selected using student achievement data, teacher surveys, needs determined by our Single Plans for Student Achievement, the new Common Core Standards, our instructional leadership team feedback, and implementation strategies thereof, as well as results from Response to Intervention classwork. Professional development is delivered via after school workshops, summer institutes, release days and conference attendance along with individual teacher mentoring. Teachers are supported through these processes with in-class coaching, teacher/principal coaching and discussions with focus on our project-based minimum days. Our district has a current focus on math, NGSS, literacy, and using high-leverage strategies. Page 17 of 17