Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity

Similar documents
GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Physics/Astronomy/Physical Science. Program Review

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

State Parental Involvement Plan

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Introduction: SOCIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

State Budget Update February 2016

Program Change Proposal:

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

School Leadership Rubrics

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

District Advisory Committee. October 27, 2015

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

Program Guidebook. Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

New Programs & Program Revisions Committee New Certificate Program Form

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Assurance Argument. September 25-26, 2017

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

Ohio Valley University New Major Program Proposal Template

Faculty of Social Sciences

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

California s Bold Reimagining of Adult Education. Meeting of the Minds September 6, 2017

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

and Beyond! Evergreen School District PAC February 1, 2012

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

1) AS /AA (Rev): Recognizing the Integration of Sustainability into California State University (CSU) Academic Endeavors

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

P A S A D E N A C I T Y C O L L E G E SHARED GOVERNANCE

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Proposing New CSU Degree Programs Bachelor s and Master s Levels. Offered through Self-Support and State-Support Modes

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

Progress or action taken

1GOOD LEADERSHIP IS IMPORTANT. Principal Effectiveness and Leadership in an Era of Accountability: What Research Says

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Identifying Users of Demand-Driven E-book Programs: Applications for Collection Development

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Division of Student Affairs Annual Report. Office of Multicultural Affairs

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Contra Costa College: HBCU Tour 2017 Due by Monday, January 9, Transfer Center SAB 227

Student Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment

Evaluation Report Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition

LEN HIGHTOWER, Ph.D.

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Wide Open Access: Information Literacy within Resource Sharing

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Growth of empowerment in career science teachers: Implications for professional development

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

Common Performance Task Data

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

21st Century Community Learning Center

The Role of Trustee. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education Seeking student trustee candidates at Slippery Rock University

Comprehensive Student Services Program Review

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

SCNS changed to MUM 2634

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

Transcription:

IA.1 The mission describes the institution s broad educational purposes, its intended student population, the types of degrees and other credentials it offers, and its commitment to student learning and student achievement. ER6: The institution's educational mission is clearly defined, adopted, and published by its governing board consistent with its legal authorization, and is appropriate to a degree- granting institution of higher education and the constituency it seeks to serve. The mission statement defines institutional commitment to student learning and achievement. Questions from Guide: o What does the institution's mission statement say about its educational purposes? Are the purposes appropriate to an institution of higher learning? o How does the mission statement inform institutional planning? o Who are the intended students for the courses offered in DE/CE format? Are they similar to or different from students studying in traditional learning mode? During SJCC s self-evaluation process, which took place [during XXX time period], it was realized that the proposed mission lacked clarity in addressing the standard. This, in turn, caused us to review, assess and modify the mission statement to clearly fulfill the standard. For this reason, the previous and proposed mission statements are presented below. SJCC s previous mission statement (adopted by the College Planning Council and in effect from May 8, 2009 to XXX) is presented below. This version of the mission statement directly addresses SJCC s broad educational purposes 1 and its commitment to student learning and student achievement 2. While it does not explicitly address the college s intended student population 3 nor the types of degrees and other credentials it offers 4, these are contained within the narrative typically associated with the mission statement. Previous Statement: The of San Jose City College is to effect social justice 1 by providing open and equitable access to quality education and programs that both challenge and prepare individuals for successful careers and active participation in a diverse, global society 2. Previous Statement Narrative: Our aligns with our Vision statement, Inspiring Success One Student at a Time as well as the Vision statement of the San Jose Evergreen Community College District, that By the year 2017, SJECCD becomes the premier institution for advancing opportunity, equity, and social justice for everyone through education excellence. To fulfill our commitment to student success and assist students of all ages and background 3 in achieving their education, employment, and life-long learning goals, SJCC offers the following: 4 Two year college degrees and certificates Lower-division transfer and general education courses Basic skills and English as a Second Language instruction Career and technology training (link)

SJCC s proposed mission statement (adopted by the College Planning Council and in effect from XXX to the present) is presented below. This version of the mission statement directly addresses SJCC s broad educational purposes 1, intended student population 2, the types of degrees and other credentials it offers 3, and its commitment to student learning and student achievement 4. Proposed Statement: The mission of San Jose City College is to serve our students and the community 2 by offering high quality, relevant, and innovative instruction for basic skills, career pathways, university transfer, and life-long learning 1 by awarding certificates and associate degrees 3 to eligible students taught in a multicultural environment where student achievement and successful learning are highly valued, supported, and continually assessed 4. Proposed Statement Narrative: The Vision of San Jose City College is to be a premiere educational institution of excellence through: The guiding principles of opportunity, equity, social justice, and open, equitable access for student success and achievement; An exceptional learning environment that challenges and empowers students through teaching excellence, robust student support programs, innovation, and state-of-the-art technologies that prepare students with the knowledge, relevant transferrable skills, creativity, ethics and values to succeed and thrive in a dynamic healthy global environment; A culture of inquiry and evidence that is characterized by the commitment of faculty staff and students to be accountable for learning excellence through the assessment of measureable and meaningful learning outcomes to increase learning, and to inform data-driven decisions that foster adaptability in programs and services. (link) Additional Evidence: The San Jose Evergreen Community College District s (SJECCD) Board of Trustees is committed to student learning and achievement through systematic assessment of its own policies and behaviors. The duties of the Board Self Evaluation committee are to assess the Board s effectiveness at meeting its responsibilities and obligations. As a part of this assessment, the board participates in an annual survey as well as a 360 o evaluation on a 3-year cycle. This 360 evaluation is included as a measure of holding the Board responsible for acting ethically and honestly while carrying out its duties. Additionally, the Board evaluates its performance at every board meeting as evidenced by the agendas and minutes. (link) The Board Ends Policies (link) are designed to align with the mission of the district and emphasize student learning and achievements as foundational to the work of the district and the colleges. They are evaluated based on metrics tracked and analyzed by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Student Success (link). Faculty, staff, administrators and board members are evaluated based upon these policies.

IA.2 The institution uses data to determine how effectively it is accomplishing its mission, and whether the mission directs institutional priorities in meeting the educational needs of students. Questions from Guide: What data does the institution use to determine whether or not it is accomplishing its mission? What institutional processes does the institution use to evaluate the effectiveness and success of its mission? (Federal Regulation) QFE: Has the institution identified groups of students whose educational needs are not proposedly being served or not being served adequately; how can the institution better serve these students? There were no data collection efforts explicitly devoted to determining how effectively the previous mission statement was being accomplished, and it was not utilized in a proactive way to direct institutional priorities in meeting the educational needs of students. The proposed mission, on the other hand, was developed with these priorities in mind. Moving forward, the following data will be collected with the specific intention of determining how effectively SJCC is accomplishing its mission: o Educational Purposes: Instructional quality will be determined via data derived from student course evaluations, program review, outcomes assessment results, and institutional set standards reporting. This data will be disaggregated for basic skills courses, career pathways, transfer students and life-long learners to help identify outcome gaps and drive related mitigation efforts. o Intended Student Population: Student demographic data in comparison with community demographic data associated with enrollment, retention and completion, will allow judgment of the degree to which our student population reflects the community we strive to serve. Data disaggregation will help identify outcome gaps and drive related mitigation efforts. o Degrees & Other Credentials Offered: Data related to certificate and degree program enrollment, retention and completion will be collected to determine the degree to which the college is meeting established benchmarks. Data disaggregation will help identify outcome gaps and drive related mitigation efforts. o Commitment to Student Learning & Student Achievement: Student, faculty and staff survey data will be one metric used to determine the degree to which the college is accomplishing its mission to provide a multicultural environment where student achievement and successful learning are highly valued, supported.... Qualitative data from the program review process, in addition to student outcome tracking data, will provide additional evidence. Evidence of continual assessment will be documented throughout the implementation of these efforts. SJCC uses data to determine how effectively it is accomplishing its mission through a number of tools, including the strategic planning metrics - which are tracked each year and the California State Community College Student Success Scorecard. Additionally, the recently approved Board Ends Policies (link) are accompanied by Ends Policy Metrics (link) that are measured and reported to the board and posted on the District website (link). The metrics for the district and colleges participation in the Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative can also be found on the District s website (link).

The mission directs institutional priorities in meeting the educational needs of students through an integrated equity agenda, and annual update to the District Office strategic planning metrics, and standards by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Student Success. ANALYSIS & EVALUATION What you have here is good for Evidence. For the A & E I would now discuss what you have outlined and include that the college will incorporate student achievement into Program review starting in 2016 cycle developed. This should also be one of those policies and procedures that need to be written.

IA.3 The institution s programs and services are aligned with its mission. The mission guides institutional decision-making, planning, and resource allocation and informs institutional goals for student learning and achievement. Questions from Guide: How does the mission statement guide planning and decision making? To what extent is the mission statement central to the choices the college makes? Has the institution considered in consultation with its key constituents if and how DE/CE is congruent with the mission? Does the mission include any statements related to its commitment to DE/CE? The previous mission was not used to align programs and services. Furthermore, the previous version of the mission was also not explicitly used to guide institutional decision-making, planning or resource allocation, nor did it inform goals for student learning and achievement. The proposed mission will drive these priorities as follows: Programs & Services Aligned to : o IPCC program modification? (Linda Meyer & Laura Garcia) Drives Institutional Decision-Making Drives Institutional Planning Institutional Resource Allocation Beginning the 2015/16 academic year, SJCC s Finance Committee developed a new budget request template implemented in coordination with the Program Review Committee (link). It requires budget managers to articulate each individual budget line item with 1) the college s General Education-Level Outcomes, 2) college goals, and 3) the president s priorities, all of which are articulated with the college s mission?. (links to each) In this way, the Finance Committee is working to tie, in a more meaningful way, resource allocation to alignment with college priorities. Informs Goals for Student Learning & Achievement ANALYSIS & EVALUATION

IA.4 The institution articulates its mission in a widely published statement approved by the governing board. The mission statement is periodically reviewed and updated as necessary. ER6: o The institution's educational mission is clearly defined, adopted, and published by its governing board consistent with its legal authorization, and is appropriate to a degree- granting institution of higher education and the constituency it seeks to serve. The mission statement defines institutional commitment to student learning and achievement. Questions from Guide: o When was the proposed mission statement approved by the governing board? o Has the mission been reviewed to reflect the commitment to DE/CE and what was the rationale for the changes to the statement? Widely Published The colleges mission is widely published through a statement approved by the governing board. Specifically, the mission is disseminated via the following mechanisms: o College s website (link) o District Website (link) o SJCC Institutional Planning & Resource Allocation Guide (link) o SJCC Education Master Plan (link) o SJCC Facilities Master Plan (link) o SJCC Catalog (link) o SJCC Strategic Plan (link) o Roar o CAC Charge o Board Policy 1200 District o Other? Periodically Reviewed & Updated The mission statement is periodically reviewed and updated by the College Advisory Council (CAC). The CAC charge explicitly states that the mission statement will be reviewed. The CAC reviewed the mission statement in fall 2013 (CAC Minutes), and its recommendations were sent to the college president, who decided to keep the mission statement as is. In fall of 2015 the CAC again reviewed the mission statement under the lens of meeting accreditation Standard 1 (see CAC agenda and minutes). An adhoc committee was formed to assess the mission statement and to propose changes so that the mission statement met the criteria of standard 1. Throughout the 2015 fall semester the proposed mission statement was vetted to the college via the Roar (See Roar editions) and direct emails from the CAC (see emails). Feedback was given to the CAC that was then shared with the Academic Senate and it is expected through continued discussion that a revised mission statement will be recommended to the college president and adopted by the Board of Trustees in early spring semester 2016. ANALYSIS & EVALUATION Throughout the self-evaluation process it became clear that although reviewing the mission statement is part of the charge of the CAC, the actual process of how the mission statement is

assessed and implemented is not well documented. There are no college policies or procedures addressing the mission statement, and unless you are a member of the CAC, college personnel would not know where to find information concerning the periodic review of the mission statement. What has been determined through the self-evaluation process is that the college needs policies and procedures that are specific and perhaps unique to SJCC that are not shared by Evergreen Valley College. E.g. Closing the loop examples ADS, art ladies