Drafting Program Review

1. Program/Department Description 1A. Description Training in Drafting will prepare one for challenging careers as drafters, designers, engineering assistants, 3-D modelers, estimators, and design/drafting checkers. Students may obtain an AS, Certificate of Achievement or preparation for transfer to a four year university in the fields of industrial design, manufacturing or industrial technology. Specialized application of various software programs are taught using current technology and methods found in the Architectural, manufacturing, and design industries. There is a broad range of career opportunities such as Drafters, Designers, Illustrators, and Model Makers. See also: Architecture and Construction Technology Degrees/Certificates Program s courses are designed to articulate to UC and CSU for transfer students. Associates in Science Degree Certificate of Achievement - Drafting Technology Electronic Drafting and Manufacturing Option Industrial Design and Manufacturing Option 1B. Estimated Costs (Certificate of Achievement ONLY) Required for Gainful Employment regulations. Cost Cost Cost Cost Enrollment Fees Enrollment Fees Books/ Supplies Books/ Supplies Total Total Total Total 1C. Criteria Used for Admission Page 1 11/10/2012

1D. College Vision Ventura College will be a model community college known for enhancing the lives and economic futures of its students and the community. 1E. College Mission Ventura College, one of the oldest comprehensive community colleges in California, provides a positive and accessible learning environment that is responsive to the needs of a highly diverse student body through a varied selection of disciplines, learning approaches and teaching methods including traditional classroom instruction, distance education, experiential learning, and co-curricular activities. It offers courses in basic skills; programs for students seeking an associate degree, certificate or license for job placement and advancement; curricula for students planning to transfer; and training programs to meet worker and employee needs. It is a leader in providing instruction and support for students with disabilities. With its commitment to workforce development in support of the State and region's economic viability, Ventura College takes pride in creating transfer, career technical and continuing education opportunities that promote success, develop students to their full potential, create lifelong learners, enhance personal growth and life enrichment and foster positive values for successful living and membership in a multicultural society. The College is committed to continual assessment of learning outcomes in order to maintain high quality courses and programs. Originally landscaped to be an arboretum, the College has a beautiful, park-like campus that serves as a vital community resource. 1F. College Core Commitments Ventura College is dedicated to following a set of enduring Core Commitments that shall guide it through changing times and give rise to its Vision, Mission and Goals. Student Success Innovation Respect Diversity Integrity Service Quality Collaboration Collegiality Sustainability Access Continuous Improvement Page 2 11/10/2012

1G. Program/Department Significant Events (Strengths and Successes) 1. The Drafting Program provides drafting students with skills necessary for higher education or Employment in a wide array and diverse area of employment. Students may choose a specific area of study or to gain broad knowledge to use in diverse fields. 2. The Drafting Program provides drafting students with the skills necessary to model or present a wide array of components according to the latest standards and advances in technology. The use of state of the art parametric modeling programs provide students with employment and advanced education skills 3. The Drafting Program uses some of the most modern software and modeling techniques in real world design problem applications providing students with the knowledge and skill of the advancing science of computer generated models, model 3D printing and model testing. 4. The Drafting Program faculty continue to represent Ventura College on committees such as the Basic Skills Subcommittee of the WIB- Ventura County Workforce Investment Board, the Hueneme High School Advisory Board for the Engineering and Design Careers Pathway Program, other program-focused high school advisory boards, and local professional groups. 5. This is the third year of faculty participation in the NSF National Science Foundation ATE grant STEM Education through the design and manufacture of solid body electric guitars. This project provides innovative professional development to high school and college faculty in collaborative design and rapid manufacturing. 6. Continued local high school relationships provide access for underserved populations in Ventura County. 7. The Drafting Program has just completed its move to the new MCE building. The move to the new facility allowed the program a state of the art facility and provides the program with 90% new equipment. 8. The Drafting Program supports students in various programs at Ventura College, such as: Engineering, Architecture, Manufacturing, Construction Technology, and Welding Page 3 11/10/2012

K. Organizational Structure President: Robin Calote Executive Vice President: Ramiro Sanchez Dean: Kathleen Schrader Department Chair: Casey Mansfield Instructors and Staff Name Ralph Fernandez Classification Professor Year Hired 1989 Years of Work-Related Experience 28 Degrees/Credentials B.A. Name Scot Rabe Classification Professor Year Hired 1984 Years of Work-Related Experience 30 Degrees/Credentials B.A. Name Casey Mansfield Classification Professor Year Hired 1991 Years of Work-Related Experience 30 Degrees/Credentials B.A., M.A. Name Chiiho Terada Classification Adjunct Professor Year Hired 1971 Years of Work-Related Experience 40 Degrees/Credentials B.A. Name Rick Leduc Classification Adjunct Professor Year Hired 2001 Years of Work-Related Experience 20 Degrees/Credentials B.A. Page 4 11/10/2012

2. Performance Expectations 2A. Student Learning Outcomes 2A1. - Institutional Student Learning Outcomes 1. Communication - written, oral and visual 2. Reasoning - scientific and quantitative 3. Critical thinking and problem solving 4. Information literacy 5. Personal/community awareness and academic/career responsibilities 2A2. - Program Level Student Learning Outcomes For programs/departments offering degrees and/or certificates 1. Demonstrate an understanding of drawing methods and graphic composition techniques 2. Prepare technical drawings using computer-aided drafting (CAD) and design software. 2A3. - Course Level Student Learning Outcomes Attached to program review (See appendices). 2B. Student SUCCESS Outcomes 1. The program will work to maintain or increase its retention rate from the average of the program s prior three-year retention rate. The retention rate is the number of students who finish a term with any grade 2. The program will work to maintain or increase its retention rate from the average of the college s prior three-year retention rate. The retention rate is the number of students who finish a term with any grade other than W or DR divided by the number of students at census. Page 5 11/10/2012

2C. Program OPERATING Outcomes 1. The program will work to maintain WSCH/FTEF above the 450 goal set by the district. 2. Inventory of all equipment over $200 will be maintained and a replacement schedule will be developed. Service contracts for equipment over $5,000 will be budgeted if funds are available. 2D. Mapping of Student Learning Outcomes - Refer to TracDat 3A. Productivity Terminology Table 3. Sections Census FTES FTEF Cross Listed FTEF XL FTE WSCH A credit or non-credit class. Does not include not-for-credit classes (community education). Number of students enrolled at census (typically the 4 th week of class for fall and spring). Full Time Equivalent Students A student in the classroom 15 hours/week for 35 weeks (or two semesters) = 525 student contact hours. 525 student contact hours = 1 FTES. Example: 400 student contact hours = 400/525 = 0.762 FTES. The State apportionment process and District allocation model both use FTES as the primary funding criterion. Full Time Equivalent Faculty A faculty member teaching 15 units for two semesters (30 units for the year) = 1 FTE. Example: a 6 unit assignment = 6/30 = 0.20 FTEF (annual). The college also computes semester FTEF by changing the denominator to 15 units. However, in the program review data, all FTE is annual. FTEF includes both Full-Time Faculty and Part-Time Faculty. FTEF in this program review includes faculty assigned to teach extra large sections (XL Faculty). This deviates from the prior practice of not including these assignments as part of FTEF. However, it is necessary to account for these assignments to properly represent faculty productivity and associated costs. FTEF is assigned to all faculty teaching cross-listed sections. The FTEF assignment is proportional to the number of students enrolled at census. This deviates from the practice of assigning load only to the primary section. It is necessary to account for these cross-listed assignments to properly represent faculty productivity and associated costs. Extra Large FTE: This is the calculated assignment for faculty assigned to extra large sections (greater than 60 census enrollments).the current practice is not to assign FTE. Example: if census>60, 50% of the section FTE assignment for each additional group of 25 (additional tiers). Weekly Student Contact Hours Page 6 11/10/2012

WSCH to FTES District Goal The term WSCH is used as a total for weekly student contact hours AND as the ratio of the total WSCH divided by assigned FTEF. Example: 20 sections of 40 students at census enrolled for 3 hours per week taught by 4.00 FTEF faculty. (20 x 40 x 3) = 2,400 WSCH / 4.00 FTEF = 600 WSCH/FTEF. Using the example above: 2,400 WSCH x 35 weeks = 84,000 student contact hours = 84,000 / 525 = 160 FTES (see FTES definition). Simplified Formulas: FTES = WSCH/15 or WSCH = FTES x 15 Program WSCH ratio goal. WSCH/FTEF The District goal was set in 2006 to recognize the differences in program productivity. 3B: Student Success Terminology Census Retain Success Number of students enrolled at Census (typically the 4 th week of class for fall and spring). Census enrollment is used to compute WSCH and FTES for funding purposes. Students completing the class with any grade other than W or DR divided by Census Example: 40 students enrolled, 5 students dropped prior to census,35 students were enrolled at census, 25 students completed the class with a grade other than W or DR: Retention Rate = 25/35 = 71% Students completing the class with grades A, B, C, CR or P divided by Census Excludes students with grades D, F, or NC. Program specific data was provided in Section 3 for all programs last year. This year, please refer to the data sources available athttp://www.venturacollege.edu/faculty_staff/academic_resources/program_review.shtml In addition, the 2011-2012 program review documents will provide examples of last year s data and interpretations. Program: DRAFTING Category Title FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 1 FT Faculty 123,587 124,608 126,796 133,173 137,022 2 PT Faculty 118,411 114,009 121,260 105,538 92,507 3 Classified 0 0 0 0 0 4 Student Hourly 0 0 0 0 0 5 Supervisors 0 0 0 0 0 6 Managers 0 0 0 0 0 7 Supplies 101 2,559 1,839 1,365 1,500 8 Services 2,910 703 1,639 219 750 9 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 Total 245,009 241,879 251,534 240,295 231,779 Page 7 11/10/2012

Category Title FY09 FY10 FY11 3 Year Average FY12 FY12 Program Change from Prior Three Year Average FY12 College Change from Prior Three Year Average 1 FT Faculty 123,587 124,608 126,796 124,997 133,173 7% 8% 2 PT Faculty 118,411 114,009 121,260 117,893 105,538-10% -8% 3 Classified - - - - - 0% -7% 4 Students - - - - - 0% 2% 5 Supervisors - - - - - 0% 6% 6 Managers - - - - - 0% 0% 7 Supplies 101 2,559 1,839 1,500 1,365-9% 1% 8 Services 2,910 703 1,639 1,751 219-87% 2% 9 Equipment - - - - - 0% 18% Total 245,009 241,879 251,534 246,141 240,295 0% Drafting 140,000 133,173 105,538 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 - - - - - 1,365 219 - FY09 FY10 FY11 3 Year Average FY12 Page 8 11/10/2012

FT Faculty PT Faculty Classified Students Supervisors Managers Supplies Services Equipment Total -10% -8% -7% -9% 0% 7% 8% 0% 0% 2% 0% 6% 0% 1% 2% 0% 0% 18% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% FY12 Program Change from Prior Three Year Average FY12 College Change from Prior Three Year Average 3C:2012-2013Please provide program interpretation for the following: 3C1: Interpretation of the Program Budget Information The Program budget information shows that the program operating expenses have been relatively stable over the years. Operational information may need to be further analyzed to accurately reflect the program s operating budget information. Further analysis of the program s budget information will need to be assessed. Page 9 11/10/2012

3C2: Interpretation of the Program Inventory Information The equipment list may not accurately reflect the program s holdings. An inventory survey will need to be completed to provide an accurate equipment list. A quick survey of existing equipment will show that the equipment has a value of over $350,000, of which approximately 90% is new, having been replaced with our current move to the new MCE building. Most of the additional equipment was purchased through VTEA fund in place to support technology students and programs. 3C3: Interpretation of the Program Productivity Information The program s offerings have decreased 30% over the past three years, while the college offerings have decreased 11% over the same period. This decrease in course offerings was primarily caused by the program being directed to eliminate offering courses that were historically co-listed courses. This has occurred over the past few years. Co listed courses had been the standard method of instruction for as long as the program has existed. Even with the decreased offerings the number of students in the program is up 13%. Although the program s numbers appear to be acceptable, cross list course with other programs appear to be detrimental to the WSCH/FTEF ratio, the program will be looking at ways to correct this issue. Due to space and equipment limitations typical Drafting Classes are limited to 24 seats. With our move to a new facility the program will be looking at ways to increase seating capacity where possible and re-establish students tracking through the program. Over the next few years with stabilized course offerings and a new facility the program expects to see a rise in enrollment and a rise in WSCH/FTEF. 3C4: Interpretation of the Program Course Productivity Information Tables D1-D4 show the program remains strong with the three year average overall WSCH at over 90% of the District goal. The individual courses show a decline as expected when course offerings were changed to eliminate the co-listing of classes, as due the FY11 numbers. Some individual courses show up to 131%WSCH goal while others show 0% of the WSCH goals as they were not offered on a regular basis due to mandated scheduling changes. The WSCH numbers need to be relooked at as they are not accurate for co-listed classes and do not reflect a true representation of the program. The program will be looking at the practice of cross-listing classes with other departments as this may not provide the college with accurate information on individual courses. As course offerings stabilize again the WSCH is expected to rise. The program has moved Page 10 11/10/2012

into its new facility with state of the art equipment, this is expected to have a positive effect on enrollment and WSCH. We will be looking at ways to make the WSCH rise in low performing classes. 3C5: Interpretation of Program Retention, Student Success, and Grade Distribution In a vocational program students understand that success is measured on the demonstration of skill, knowledge and ability. Successful students strive to consistently generate portfolio quality work. Gainful employment and/or successful articulation of classes to universities are dependent on the quality of work students generated in the program. Students work to achieve success in the program as is shown. The three year average retention and success rates mirror the college s three year average. Grade Summary shows the effort extended by students in the program. The graphs do not show the number of current and former students gainfully employed in local industry or the number of successful transfer students from the program. As a program we are always looking at ways to improve courses and course offerings based on student needs and we will continue this practice 3C6: Interpretation of the Program Completion Information Co listed courses had been the standard method of instruction for as long as the program has existed. The program has been directed to eliminate historically co-listed course offerings. The elimination of co-listed courses has made it difficult for students to achieve success. The program is in the process ofl re-evaluate its certificate and degree requirements and course offerings to make successful completion of the program more attainable to students. 3C7: Interpretation of the Program Demographic Information The ethnic and gender distribution in the Drafting Program has remained relatively constant over the past three years. The ethnic distribution roughly mirrors the college distribution, while the program s gender distribution shows a greater number of males than the college average. From the data it can be seen that the program serves many under-represented students. Page 11 11/10/2012

4. Performance Assessment 4A1:Institutional Level Student Learning Outcomes Institutional Level Student Learning Outcome 1 Communication Institutional Level Student Learning Outcome 2 Reasoning Scientific and Quantitative Institutional Level Student Learning Outcome 3 Critical Thinking and problem solving Page 12 11/10/2012

Institutional Level Student Learning Outcome 4 Information Literacy Institutional Level Student Learning Outcome 5 Personal/community awareness and academic / career responsibilities 4A2: Program Level Student Learning Outcomes - For programs/departments offering degrees and/or certificates Program-Level Student Learning Outcome 1 Demonstrate an understanding of drawing methods and graphic composition techniques. Students complete projects using industry standard drawing methods and techniques. Students will complete graphic compositions at a professional level. In courses with a graphic element, projects are reviewed for format, content and graphic composition. Students view methods and techniques used by other students and learn from examples and instructor reviews. Students are able to refine their presentation ability through increasing projects complexities. Project work is evaluated for graphic composition, drawing methods, completeness and professional Page 13 11/10/2012

industry standards. Program-Level Student Learning Outcome 2 Prepare technical drawings using computer-aided drafting (CAD) and design software. Students create concept and detailed drawings and/or models using professional methods and standards. Students create technical drawings using the latest computer-aided software. Students will develop technical drawings from 2D drawings and 3D models they complete from information provided. Student work is evaluated for technical ability, drafting skills and professional standards. Program-Level Student Learning Outcome 3 Analyze technical drawings and provide appropriate solution. Students evaluate and select appropriate method of solutions to technical problem. Students develop problem solutions to technical problems using appropriate software, graphic drawings and/or model creation. Instructor will guide student in appropriate solution selection. Student work is evaluated for appropriate solution to given problem, technical methods and professional standards. Program-Level Student Learning Outcome 4 Page 14 11/10/2012

Program-Level Student Learning Outcome 5 4A3: Course Level Student Learning Outcomes - Refer to TracDat 4B: Student Success Outcomes Student Success Outcome 1 The program will increase its retention rate from the average of the program s prior three-year retention rate. The retention rate is the number of students who finish a term with any grade other than W or DR divided by the number of students at census. The program will increase the retention rate by above the average of the program s retention rate for the prior three years. The Drafting Program s average three year retention rate is 86%. This 86% is a 2% increase as was the prior year s goal. The college s three year average retention rate is 85%. The program is a mirror of the college s three year average retention rate. An increase in retention rate will require the program to attain a retention rate of above 86%. The program will work to attain this goal. Page 15 11/10/2012

Student Success Outcome 2 The program will increase its retention rate from the average of the college s prior three-year retention rate. The retention rate is the number of students who finish a term with any grade other than W or DR divided by the number of students at census. The program will increase the retention rate by above the average of the college retention rate for the prior three years The Drafting Program s average three year retention rate is 86%. The college s three year average retention rate is 85%. The program is a mirror of the college s three year average retention rate. The program will work to increase its retention rate above the college average. 4C. Program Operating Outcomes Program Operating Outcome 1 The program will maintain WSCH/FTEF above the 450 goal set by the district. The program will work to the efficiency goal of 450 set by the district. The Drafting Program has a three year average WSCH/FTEF of 90% of the district goal. The Drafting Program will work to attain the goal set by the district. Page 16 11/10/2012

Program Operating Outcome 2 Inventory of instructional equipment is functional, current, and otherwise adequate to maintain a qualitylearning environment. Inventory of all equipment over $200 will be maintained and a replacement schedule will be developed. Service contracts for equipment over $5000 will be budgeted if funds are available. A current inventory of all equipment in the program will be maintained. Equipment having a value over $5000 will have a service contract. A schedule for service life and replacement of outdated equipment will reflect the total cost of ownership. The inventory list needs to be reviewed regularly for accuracy. An inventory survey will need to be done to provide an accurate equipment list. A quick survey of existing equipment will show that the equipment has a value of over $350,000, of which approximately 90% is new, having been replaced with our current move to the new MCE building. Much of the program s equipment has a long term life span (+ 15 years) and was just purchased with the program s current move to the MCE building. Additional equipment used in the program has been purchased through VTEA fund in place to support technology students and programs. 4D. Program Review Rubrics for Instructional Programs Academic Programs Point Value Element Score Up to 6 Enrollment demand Up to 6 Sufficient resources to support the program (ability to find qualified instructors; financial resources; equipment; space) Up to 4 Agreed-upon productivity rate Up to 4 Retention rate Up to 3 Success rate (passing with C or higher) Up to 3 Ongoing and active participation in SLO assessment process Total Points Interpretation 22 26 Program is current and vibrant with no further action recommendation 18 21 Recommendation to attempt to strengthen the program Below 18 Recommendation to consider discontinuation of the program Page 17 11/10/2012

TOTAL CTE Programs Point Value Element Score Up to 6 Enrollment demand 6 Up to 6 Sufficient resources to support the program (ability to find qualified instructors; financial resources; equipment; space) 6 Up to 6 Program success (degree / certificate / proficiency award completion over 4 year period) 3 Up to 4 Agreed-upon productivity rate 4 Up to 4 Retention rate 4 Up to 4 Employment outlook for graduates / job market relevance 4 Up to 3 Success rate (passing with C or higher) 3 Up to 3 Ongoing and active participation in SLO assessment process 3 Total Points Interpretation 31 36 Program is current and vibrant with no further action recommendation 25 30 Recommendation to attempt to strengthen the program Below 25 Recommendation to consider discontinuation of the program Total Score 33 5. Findings - FINDINGS Finding 1: The program mirrors the college success and retention rates even with the current restrictions on scheduling and reductions on the number of sections The schedule must be carefully setup to help students complete certificate or degree options. Finding 2: In a vocational program students understand that success in the drafting program is measured on the demonstration of ability. Successful students strive to consistently generate portfolio quality work. Gainful employment and/or successful articulation of classes to universities are dependent on the quality of work students generated in the program. Students work to achieve success in the program which is shown in both retention and success rate. A look at the grade summary shows the effort extended by students in the program. Data collected by the college does not show the number of successful university Page 18 11/10/2012

transfers or the number of students or former students gainfully employed in local industry. As a program we are always looking at ways to improve courses and course offerings based on student needs. Finding 3: The program is in the process of evaluating the degree and certificates offered to verify that degrees/certificates are current with industry needs and are more attainable to students. It must be recognized that many students may be only taking specific classes to gain employment or to upgrade their employment skills. The program will work to attain a certificate/degree rate of 20% or more of students enrolled in second year courses. As a practice evaluations will need to be done of the goals of the students in the program Finding 4: 90% of the equipment used in the program is new, having been replaced with the program s move to the new MCE building. Much of the program s equipment has a long term life span (+ 15 years). VTEA funds are used to support technology students and program. Finding 5: The program serves many under-represented students and offers them a method of attaining a higher education degree that may otherwise not be attainable to them. The program offers them a method of admittance to a university program and the ability to gain career and lifelong learning skills. Finding 6: The program is a valuable asset to the community and has both professional and community support. Professional and former students donate their time in support of the program. Page 19 11/10/2012

Line Number Program Category Program Priority (0, 1, 2, 3 ) Division Priority (R,H,M,L) Committee Priority (R, H, M, L) College Priority (R, H, M, L) Initiative ID Initiative Title Resource Description Estimated Cost Adjusted Cost Accumulated Costs Full Time or Part Time Drafting Program Review 6. Initiatives 6A: 2011-2012 - Initiatives Please refer to last year s program review document identifying the initiatives for last year. If there are any initiatives from last year that were not funded, and the program/department would like to request funding for them again this year, carry over the initiative maintaining the original identifier to this year s program review. 2011-2012 FINAL Program Initiative Priority Ratings 1 Drafting 2 Drafting 3 Drafting 4 Drafting 5 Drafting None None None Grants Grants 0 M DRFT1201 Curriculum Improvements 0 M DRFT1204 Evaluation of the degree and certificate requirements 0 M DRFT1205 Re-evaluate practice of cross-listing classes 1 H DRFT1202 Continuous technology updates 1 H DRFT1203 Instructional skills upgrades Curriculum changes based on changing industry and educational standards and requirements. Degrees/certificates are more attainable to all students - - - - Re-evaluate practice of cross-listing - - classes Hardware and software updates 10,000 - Continuous training on software updates 3,000 - Page 20 11/10/2012

6B:INITIATIVES Initiative ID should be consistent. For example: 2011-2012 identified initiatives - ART1201, ART1202, etc. identified initiatives - ART1301, ART1302, etc. Initiative 1301 Curriculum Improvement Initiative ID Drafting Program Links to Finding 1,2 and 6 Benefits - Improved curriculum will provide students with employment and transfer skills Request for Resources None at this time Funding Sources No new resources are required (use existing resources) x Requires additional general funds for personnel, supplies or services (includes maintenance contracts) Requires computer equipment funds (hardware and software) Requires college equipment funds (other than computer related) Requires college facilities funds Requires other resources (grants, etc.) Initiative 1302: Continuous technology updates Initiative ID Drafting Program Links to Finding 1,2 and 6 Benefits - Continuous hardware and software updates will provide the most current resources for students. Current technology will provide the method for students to achieve further success and retention in the program. Request for Resources Continuous technology updates Funding Sources No new resources are required (use existing resources) Requires additional general funds for personnel, supplies or services (includes maintenance contracts) Requires computer equipment funds (hardware and software) Requires college equipment funds (other than computer related) Requires college facilities funds Requires other resources (grants, etc.) X Page 21 11/10/2012

Initiative 1303: Instructional skills upgrades Initiative ID Drafting Program Links to Finding 1,2 and 6 Benefits - Students are trained on the most current software Request for Resources Annual software training classes ($4000) Funding Sources No new resources are required (use existing resources) Requires additional general funds for personnel, supplies or services (includes maintenance contracts) Requires computer equipment funds (hardware and software) Requires college equipment funds (other than computer related) Requires college facilities funds Requires other resources (grants, etc.) X Initiative 1304: Evaluation of the degree and certificate requirements Initiative ID Drafting Program Links to Finding 3 and 5 Benefits Degrees/certificates are more attainable to students. Request for Resources None Funding Sources No new resources are required (use existing resources) X Requires additional general funds for personnel, supplies or services (includes maintenance contracts) Requires computer equipment funds (hardware and software) Requires college equipment funds (other than computer related) Requires college facilities funds Requires other resources (grants, etc.) Initiative 1305: The program will need to re-evaluate its practice of cross-listing classes. Initiative ID Drafting Program Links to Finding 1 Benefits The program data will be more reflective of actual student data. Request for Resources None Funding Sources No new resources are required (use existing resources) Requires additional general funds for personnel, supplies or services (includes maintenance contracts) Requires computer equipment funds (hardware and software) Requires college equipment funds (other than computer related) Requires college facilities funds Requires other resources (grants, etc.) X Page 22 11/10/2012

Initiative 1306: Part time Lab Tech/assistant (30 hours per week) Initiative ID Drafting Program Links to Finding 2 and 5 Benefits Class room support will help student retention. Request for Resources $20,000, May come from Perkins Funds Funding Sources No new resources are required (use existing resources) Requires additional general funds for personnel, supplies or services (includes maintenance contracts) Requires computer equipment funds (hardware and software) Requires college equipment funds (other than computer related) Requires college facilities funds Requires other resources (grants, etc.) X X Initiative 1307: Mobile Rapid Prototype Machine Initiative ID Drafting Program Links to Finding 5 Benefits Support for student retention. Request for Resources $2,500 Funding Sources No new resources are required (use existing resources) Requires additional general funds for personnel, supplies or services (includes maintenance contracts) Requires computer equipment funds (hardware and software) Requires college equipment funds (other than computer related) Requires college facilities funds Requires other resources (grants, etc.) X Page 23 11/10/2012

Initiative 1308: Meet Perkins Core Indicators Initiative ID Drafting Program Links to Finding 5 Benefits Support for student recruitment, retention, completion and workforce employment, especially for special population and non-traditional students.. Meet Perkins Core Indicators in regards to student recruitment, retention, completion and workforce employment, especially for special population and non-traditional students. No cost Request for Resources None Funding Sources No new resources are required (use existing resources) Requires additional general funds for personnel, supplies or services (includes maintenance contracts) Requires computer equipment funds (hardware and software) Requires college equipment funds (other than computer related) Requires college facilities funds Requires other resources (grants, etc.) X Page 24 11/10/2012

Program Finding Number Category Program Priority (R, H, M, L) Division Priority (R,H,M,L) Committee Priority (R, H, M, L) College Priority (H, M, L) Initiative ID Initiative Title Resource Description Estimated Cost Drafting Program Review 6C: Program Initiative Priority Ratings Drafting None M M 1301 Curriculum Improvements Curriculum changes based on changing industry and educational standards and requirements - Drafting None M M 1304 Evaluate degree and certificates offered Degrees and certificates offered are current with industry requirements - Drafting None M M 1305 Continue to evaluate the benefit/detriment of cross listing classes Continue to evaluate the benefit/detriment of cross listing classes - Drafting Grants H H 1302 Continuous technology updates Hardware and software updates 10,000 Drafting Grants H H 1303 Instructional skills upgrades Continuous training on software updates 3,000 Drafting Grants/ Gen Funds Drafting Grants H H 1307 H H 1306 Lab Tech/Assistant Classroom support 20,000 Rapid prototype Machine Mobile Rapid Prototype Machine and computer for program recruitment 4,500 Drafting None H H 1308 Meet Perkins Core Indicators Support for student - Page 25 11/10/2012

6D: PRIORITIZATIONS OF INITIATIVES WILL TAKE PLACE AT THE PROGRAM, DIVISION, COMMITTEE, AND COLLEGE LEVELS: Program/Department Level Initiative Prioritization All initiatives will first be prioritized by the program/department staff. Prioritize the initiatives using the RHML priority levels defined below. Division Level Initiative Prioritization The program initiatives within a division will be consolidated into division spreadsheets. The dean may include additional division-wide initiatives. All initiatives will then be prioritized using the RHML priority levels defined below. Committee Level Initiative Prioritization The division s spreadsheets will be prioritized by the appropriate college-wide committees (staffing, technology, equipment, facilities) using the RHML priority levels defined below. College Level Initiative Prioritization Dean s will present the consolidated prioritized initiatives to the College Planning Council. The College Planning Council will then prioritize the initiatives using the RHML priority levels defined below. R: Required mandated or unavoidable needs (litigation, contracts, unsafe to operate conditions, etc.). H: High approximately 1/3 of the total program/department/division s initiatives by resource category (personnel, equipment, etc.) M: Medium approximately 1/3 of the total program/department/division s initiatives by resource category (personnel, equipment, etc.) L: Low approximately 1/3 of the total program/department/division s initiatives by resource category (personnel, equipment, etc.) Page 26 11/10/2012

7A. Purpose of Process Assessment 7. Process Assessment and Appeal The purpose of program review assessment is to evaluate the process for continual improvement. The process is required for accreditation and your input is very important to us as we strive to improve. 7B. 2012-2013 ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS 1. Did you complete the program review process last year, and if so, did you identify program initiatives? Yes program review was completed last year and we indentified program initiatives. 2a.Were the identified initiatives implemented? Yes the program implemented and is still in the process of implementing the proposed initiatives. 2b.Did the initiatives make a difference? Yes the program enrollment is up. 3. If you appealed or presented a minority opinion for the program review process last year, what was the result? N/A 4. How have the changes in the program review process worked for your area? The program review process made us more aware of college and state wide issues and goals. Based on this knowledge we can make appropriate changes and upgrades to the program. 5. How would you improve the program review process based on this experience? Many changes take time to implement and see the fruition of your changes. I would suggest that more abbreviated review take place annually with the appropriate Dean and advisory group, and that a full review take place every 3-5 years. 7C. Appeals After the program review process is complete, your program has the right to appeal the ranking of initiatives. If you choose to appeal, please complete the appropriate form that explains and supports your position. Forms are located at the Program Review VC website. The appeal will be handled at the next higher level of the program review process. Page 27 11/10/2012