Office of the Vice President for Management and Budget. Process Simplification Annual Report

Similar documents
Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

University of Toronto

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

School Leadership Rubrics

Program Change Proposal:

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO. Audit Report June 11, 2014

The IDN Variant Issues Project: A Study of Issues Related to the Delegation of IDN Variant TLDs. 20 April 2011

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

Mission Statement To achieve excellence in our Pharm.D. and graduate programs through innovative education and leading edge research.

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

DVANCING BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH TRAINING ADVANCING BIOMEDICAL Lead RESEARCH TRAINING

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Examples of Individual Development Plans (IDPs)

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

University of Delaware Library STRATEGIC PLAN

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

LaGrange College. Faculty Handbook

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

State Budget Update February 2016

Entry Plan for the First 100 Days for Tari N. Thomas. Interim Superintendent of Schools Orange, Petersham and RC Mahar Regional

Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position)

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

REPORT OF THE PROVOST S REVIEW PANEL. Clinical Practices and Research in the Department of Neurological Surgery June 27, 2013

A Framework for Articulating New Library Roles

Developing Regional Work-Based Learning

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA ADMINISTRATIVE / PROFESSIONAL PAY PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2015 BENEFITS-ELIGIBLE EXEMPT (MONTHLY) EMPLOYEES

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Ministry of Education, Republic of Palau Executive Summary

SECTION 1: SOLES General Information FACULTY & PERSONNEL HANDBOOK

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year

Progress or action taken

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

LEN HIGHTOWER, Ph.D.

Promoting the Wholesome Professor: Building, Sustaining & Assessing Faculty. Pearson, M.M. & Thomas, K. G-SUN-0215h 1

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

Early Career Awards (ECA) - Overview

Upward Bound Program

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

PROGRAM PRESENTATION

SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

DRAFT VERSION 2, 02/24/12

Self-Study Report. Markus Geissler, PhD

This Access Agreement covers all relevant University provision delivered on-campus or in our UK partner institutions.

Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Student Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment

TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Duke University FACULTY HANDBOOK THE

Friday, October 3, 2014 by 10: a.m. EST

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

Beyond the Blend: Optimizing the Use of your Learning Technologies. Bryan Chapman, Chapman Alliance

FRESNO COUNTY INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN UPDATE

Strategic Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Measures

WMO Global Campus: Frequently Asked Questions and Answers, July 2015 V1. WMO Global Campus: Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

State Parental Involvement Plan

FY16 UW-Parkside Institutional IT Plan Report

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

Nearing Completion of Prototype 1: Discovery

Executive Council Manual

Xenia Community Schools Board of Education Goals. Approved May 12, 2014

CCC Online Education Initiative and Canvas. November 3, 2015

College Action Project Worksheet for CAP Projects March 18, 2016 Update

SSTATE SYSIP STEMIC IMPROVEMENT PL A N APRIL 2016

Statewide Academic Council Summary July 30, 2015; 10am-12pm , guest PIN

Comprehensive Student Services Program Review

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

Strategic Plan Revised November 2012 Reviewed and Updated July 2014

CIT Annual Update for

Transcription:

Office of the Vice President for Management and Budget Process Simplification 2010 2011 Annual Report August 29, 2011

Overview Process Simplification (PS), the University s formal improvement effort, seeks to enhance the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of processes that affect faculty, staff, and students and to build institutional capacity for continuous improvement efforts. In 2010-11, Process Simplification pursued this mission through the work of cross-functional projects, education and outreach opportunities for employees, and active solicitation of improvement ideas. Process Simplification projects addressed improvements in varied areas of the University including the production of maps of Grounds, conference organization and planning, training administration and the delivery of the training program, and a new internal financial model. PS coordinated and delivered several educational sessions for faculty and staff to learn about improvement tools and approaches, including a Rapid Fire Approach to Process Simplification, a fast-paced, group interactive-learning experience. This training was given to approximately 60 members of the Financial Outreach Group, leaders in the finance organization reporting to the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. PS began planning to establish a community of continuous improvement with the intent to provide a forum to showcase improvement successes and to provide a formal means for sharing ideas across the institution. The PS Advisory Committee (PSAC) met on a monthly basis throughout the year and in February 2011 began working with the new Director of Process Simplification to strategize the direction for the Process Simplification program. The PSAC reconfirmed the mission and vision as well as roles and membership of both the Advisory and Steering Committees. They provided assistance with the identification and prioritization of projects for PS participation and based their decisions on the alignment with the University s strategy and goals and the potential magnitude of impact. The PS Steering Committee (PSSC) met in May 2011 and confirmed the PS vision, mission, roles, strategy and roadmap. As a result, Process Simplification is now positioned to work on those projects that will bring the most value to the University. PS is grateful for the commitment and support of both the Steering and Advisory Committees. For a list of committee members and PS staff, see Appendix A: Process Simplification Committees and Staff Members. The following report provides a brief summary of each initiative in 2010-11. For more information, full project reports are available on the PS web site: http://www.virginia.edu/processsimplification/ The Director of Process Simplification, the Assistant Vice President for Management and Budget, and the Vice President are committed to leveraging the formal improvement effort for the overall betterment of the institution. At this time, the work will be executed with current PS staff and will rely upon the vast expertise within the University community to serve on teams and provide subject matter perspective. PS will continue to execute team-based project improvement work in partnership with key stakeholders, participate in strategic improvements where feasible, and foster an improvement-conscious culture. Process Simplification 2010 2011 Annual Report 2

PROCESS SIMPLIFICATION - SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS Three new projects were initiated in 2010-2011: o School of Medicine Clinical Budgeting Process o New Internal Financial Model o Fine Arts Collectibles Inventory Three projects were completed in 2010-2011: o Postdoctoral Onboarding (completed Oct. 2010) o UMapIT (completed June 2011) o School of Medicine Clinical Budget Process (completed June 2011) Four projects will continue into 2011-2012: o Training Alignment Team o Conference Organization and Planning o Fine Arts Collectibles Inventory o New Internal Financial Model PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS AND STATUS Appointment of Postdoctoral Researchers Postdoctoral researchers represent a major component of the research enterprise at U.Va. and are essential to maintaining and expanding research productivity and funding. The postdoctoral appointment is temporary and conferred upon an individual who has recently been awarded a Ph.D. or equivalent doctorate in the appropriate field and who will be involved in full-time research or scholarship. The process of initiating a postdoctoral appointment is highly decentralized and requires considerable coordination among many offices. There currently exists no standardized, formal process for hiring postdoctoral researchers, and the University does not have a dedicated, central office for postdoctoral scholars. As a result, research administrators among the various schools have identified challenges that delay the appointment of postdoctoral researchers. In addition, postdocs face a distinctive set of problems and uncertainties most frequently dealing with the policies, procedures, and benefits that are applicable to their unique position at the University. Process Simplification was asked to research and make recommendations for improvement to the postdoctoral program. Outcome: In October 2010, PS analyzed the current postdoctoral program and identified opportunities for improvement. Recommendations included increasing efficiency and effectiveness of the program by establishing standard policies and procedures, clearly defining and clarifying the role of postdoctoral researcher; expanding the current postdoctoral program office as well as expanding and clarifying the role of the director. The final report was distributed to representatives from the Office of the Vice President for Research and the Office for Research in the School of Medicine, who will further assess the recommendations and designate personnel in their respective areas to lead the implementation of selected improvements. Process Simplification 2010 2011 Annual Report 3

University Mapping Implementation Team (UMapIT) The University Mapping Implementation Team (UMapIT) was created to develop and implement the University Mapping Initiative (UMI) team recommendations. The UMI team found that the development of University maps was the responsibility of numerous offices across Grounds, resulting in the duplication of effort and a variety of mapping styles. Even though these entities shared information and collaborated across departmental lines, outdated maps were still produced. Outcome: The UMapIT team implemented many of the UMI recommendations and improved University maps and reduced the costs associated with their production and distribution. They centralized mapping information and services, using equipment and materials more efficiently, standardizing processes to improve the appearance and accuracy of University maps, and promoted the availability of University maps and mapping tools. UMapIT established a coordinated but distributed virtual mapping office, consolidated existing base mapping resources, designed an online self-service mapping portal for the University community, and promoted the availability of mapping and GIS resources across Grounds. UMapIT initiative was successfully realized and completed in June 2011. School of Medicine / University Physicians Group (Health Service Foundation) Clinical Budget Process Process Simplification was asked to map the School of Medicine / Health Services Foundation clinical budget process. This very complex clinical budgeting process had not been mapped in detail, and the lack of understanding the key relationships and steps of the process was a barrier to progress on a related software system deployment to automate this budget process. Outcome: In June, Process Simplification facilitated process mapping sessions in a rapid turnaround project (4 weeks) that was critical to moving the stalled software implementation forward. The mapping resulted in a streamlined budget process, which reduced the budget data gathering by 1 month, affording more time for critical analysis and executive decision-making. The project was completed in June 2011 and met the team s immediate needs. Training Alignment Team Bringing together leaders from key provider areas and user groups at the University, the Training Alignment Team (TAT) exists for the purpose of: 1) devising a formal structure for coordinating training efforts across Grounds; 2) increasing institutional efficiency by improving communication and eliminating redundancy; and 3) ensuring training quality through common assessment standards. 2010-2011 Progress: Process Simplification continued to partner with UHR throughout the year to redesign an improved training program. Through PS facilitated sessions, the TAT has completed the initial redesign by process mapping the cradle to grave training process and identified opportunities for improvement throughout the process. These areas for improvement will be developed by the TAT team over the next few months to provide a quality, effective and Process Simplification 2010 2011 Annual Report 4

efficient training process that will be implemented in coordination with the new Oracle Learning Management System in 2012. Conference Organization and Planning (COP) The goal of the COP project is to streamline conference planning services for University employees, including conference hosts, planners, and participants; coordinate services among the various conference planning providers for increased efficiency and optimal use of resources; leverage technology for enhanced conference organization and planning; and promote the available conference planning resources to the University community. 2010-2011 Progress: Conference services has increased efficiency and effectiveness by consolidating resources, developing and documenting standard policy and practices and is currently in the process of branding, advertising and communicating their services throughout Grounds. The project will be completed in the fall after hosting open houses and meetings with departments to explain their expanded scope and promote their services. Performance measures will be developed to monitor this redesigned, one-stop shop service. COP is in the realization phase of the project. Fine Arts Inventory of Collectibles Process Simplification was requested to lead this project as a result of an internal audit report. The goal for this project is to establish the ownership, process, and a system for tracking the "inventory of collectibles" that are owned by the University but not housed within the UVa museums. These non-museum fine and decorative art items include art, furnishings, books, antiques, and museum-owned collectibles that are displayed around the University buildings and grounds. Many of these items are gifts or donations to the University. Currently, PS is collecting background information and defining the project scope. The project will continue into 2011-12 and is expected to be completed within the fiscal year. New Internal Financial Model The new internal financial model is a key strategic initiative for the University and is sponsored by the Provost and Chief Operating Officer. One of the president s primary goals for this year, is the development of an internal financial model that emphasizes transparent decision-making, incentive-based allocations, and prudent stewardship of the University s resources. A steering committee comprised of vice presidents and deans is providing oversight and making policy decisions as the University replaces its current resource allocation model and implements the new model with improved financial reporting. The current project, which formally started with a launch by President Sullivan in May 2011, is expected to implement for the 2013-2014 fiscal year. 2010-2011 Progress: In May, Process Simplification partnered with the new financial model project team and took on the responsibilities of the interim Project Director until the permanent director can be hired. This role has been responsible for developing the project scope, timeline and budget and has managed the project through the conceptual study phase of the project. PS has worked closely with the Co-sponsors, Steering Committee and Core Work Group to initiate and organize this project to meet all milestones. Once the new project director is hired, PS will continue to work with the team and focus on development of the new budget and strategic Process Simplification 2010 2011 Annual Report 5

planning process, the development of performance measures for ongoing monitoring, and creating the mechanism for continuous improvement of the process following realization. OUTREACH AND EDUCATION Training: Rapid Fire Approach to Process Simplification PS delivered a group interactive-learning experience about improvement approaches and tools. This two hour training was given to approximately 60 members of the Financial Outreach Group, leaders in the finance organization, who report to the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Summer Education Series: Introduction to Process Improvement An Introduction to Process Improvement class was conducted in the summer of 2010, cosponsored by Leadership Development and Process Simplification. The class of approximately 20 attendees from across the University represented departments such as Housing, the Darden Graduate School of Business, the Office of the President, and the Department of Athletics. The class was comprised of four 3-hour sessions and focused on the basic principles of process improvement: methodology and tools, facilitation, and working with teams, and provided active learning exercises to gain experience with process improvement tools. Community of Continuous Improvement Process Simplification seeks to establish a sustainable framework to have individuals from all across the University with an interest in improvement work regularly engage with one another for the benefit of the institution. The community concept appears to be a good mechanism to achieve this connectivity. PS met with others who have successfully established communities and inquired how best to get started. Due to other project demands this creation of a Community of Continuous Improvement was temporarily suspended. Establishing this community is a high priority for 2011-12. SERVICE TO THE PROFESSION Showcasing Successful University of Virginia Improvements PS has assisted units across Grounds to draft submissions for various awards that recognize improvement efforts, both PS and department-led initiatives. This year a proposal, highlighting the University s Records Management Program, was prepared for the National Consortium for Continuous Improvement (NCCI) - Leveraging Excellence Award. While Records Management was not selected to receive an award, it was beneficial to document its success and simultaneously increase the visibility of the University s commitment to continuous improvement among higher education institutions. Mentoring Others throughout the University The Director of Process Simplification has served as a mentor to project leads, project managers, group/department heads, and other interested persons and shared her expertise and knowledge about methodologies, tools, and project management best practices. She has been a resource for the project management staff on several high-visibility projects for the School of Medicine, University Physicians Group (Health Services Foundation), and Human Resources. She also Process Simplification 2010 2011 Annual Report 6

participated in continuous improvement opportunities with the IT project management community and the Procurement continuous improvement group. PS is committed to mentoring and coaching to build expertise and skills in process improvement throughout the University. Sharing Expertise and Learning from Others From time to time PS is called upon to share its expertise with other institutions. For example in the past year, the University of Washington sought PS guidance on developing an initiative for Organizational Effectiveness. More recently, PS reached out to the University of Michigan to gain insights into its effective customer survey program that provides feedback about the quality of internal services provided by one University department to another. This research will assist the Office of the VP for Management and Budget realize one of its 2011-12 organizational goals, and other departments interested in systematic feedback from its customers. The University is an active institutional member of the National Consortium for Continuous Improvement in Higher Education (NCCI). The Assistant VP for Management and Budget just concluded two terms totaling six years on the Board of Directors. The AVP also presented at the annual conference in July 2011. This consortium advances administrative and academic effectiveness in higher education by identifying, promoting, supporting and sharing organizational practices among member institutions. NCCI addresses a range of topics related to continuous improvement in higher education, including organizational leadership, assessment, process improvement, strategic planning, organizational development, academic and administrative integration, and change management. Process Simplification 2010 2011 Annual Report 7

Appendix A: Process Simplification Committees and Staff Members Steering Committee Colette Sheehy, Chair, Vice President for Management and Budget Milton Adams, Interim Executive Vice President and Provost Pat Lampkin, Vice President and Chief Student Affairs Officer Thomas Skalak, Vice President for Research James Hilton, Vice President and Chief Information Officer Yoke San Reynolds, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Leonard Sandridge / Michael Strine, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Susan Carkeek, Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer Nancy Rivers, Chief of Staff to the President Advisory Committee Barbara Deily, Chief Audit Executive Michael McPherson, Deputy Chief Information Officer Rich Kovatch, Associate Vice President for Business Operations Carol Stash Stanley, University Registrar Christina Morell, Assistant Vice President for Student Affairs David Smith, Professor of Environmental Sciences Process Simplification Staff Sarah Collie, Assistant Vice President for Management and Budget Lee Baszczewski, Director of Process Simplification Todd Parks, Doctoral Intern (part time) Process Simplification 2010 2011 Annual Report 8