School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Diablo Vista Middle 1

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Engage Educate Empower

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Val Verde Unified School District

Val Verde Unified School District

Shelters Elementary School

Hokulani Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Kahului Elementary School

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

3/6/2009. Residence Halls & Strategic t Planning Overview. Residence Halls Overview. Residence Halls: Marapai Supai Kachina

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Cuero Independent School District

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS SURVEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEVEL RLA/ELD WORKSHEET

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Clark Lane Middle School

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Geographic Area - Englewood

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Robert Bennis Elementary School

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

Antioch Charter Academy II

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Overview Transmission Dates What s New Contracts and Salaries CPI and PSC Codes Items to Remember Reports

Campus Improvement Plan Elementary/Intermediate Campus: Deretchin Elementary Rating: Met Standard

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Cypress College STEM² Program Application

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Antioch Charter Academy II

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

OHIO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION SALARY SCHEDULES Revised 7/3/12

University of Arizona

NC Community College System: Overview

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Instructional Materials Survey For Compliance With Education Code Sections 1240 (i) And Elementary School Level

School Physical Activity Policy Assessment (S-PAPA)

CDS Code

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Special Education December Count Webinar Training Colorado Department of Education

A Pilot Study on Pearson s Interactive Science 2011 Program

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Transcription:

Santa Rosa Technology Magnet 13282 Santa Rosa Road Camarillo, CA 93012-8200 (805) 491-3822 Grades K-8 Thomas Holtke, Principal tholtke@pvsd.k12.ca.us www.pvsd.k12.ca.us/domain/85 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card Published During the 2014-15 School Year ----{isarc_dlogo}---- Pleasant Valley Elementary School District 600 Temple Ave. Camarillo, CA 93010 (805) 482-2763 www.pvsd.k12.ca.us/pvsd/default.htm District Governing Board District Administration RaeAnne Michael Superintendent Principal s Message Welcome to Santa Rosa Technology Magnet School (SRTMS), Home of the Eagles. At SRTMS we use exceptional teaching practices, cutting-edge technology, and real world experiences to create profound learning opportunities for every student. SRTMS is a kindergarten through eighth grade academic program serving students from five to fourteen years of age. The SRTMS vision is to develop the whole child and foster a desire for lifelong learning. We utilize a multidisciplinary approach to provide instruction based upon the Common Core Standards while making education relevant and real. The SRTMS focus on technology further supports and enriches the educational process and accelerates a student s abilities and skill sets to meet the challenges of the future. Our site technology committee focuses our short and long term goals, creates opportunities for staff development and guides our professional learning communities to create lessons rich in technology. Students in kindergarten through eighth grades utilize the Microsoft Suites and open source software to create multimedia projects that extend and enrich the daily curriculum. All sixth, seventh, and eighth grade students are provided with a Chromebook and access to our wireless network to use within the classroom and at home. Our entire student population has access to six Chromebook (4) or ipad (2) carts, utilizes a state-of-the-art computer lab, STEM lab, and teleconference system. Santa Rosa Technology Magnet takes pride in the fact that our campus is a safe, secure and nurturing environment, that supports the entire school community. Middle school students participate in leadership programs and electives that further develops the whole child (Robotics, Web Design, Coding, Speech, Debate, Drama, Art, Economics, Yearbook, ASB / Leadership). Eagle Pride! Thomas Holtke, Principal School Profile Pleasant Valley School District consists of eleven schools serving grades kindergarten through eight. Santa Rosa Technology Magnet is one of two Kindergarten through eighth grade schools in the Pleasant Valley School District. SRTMS provides a high quality education program that integrates technology into a Standards Based Curriculum while developing the total child and fostering a love of learning. Our educational philosophy is based on mutual respect, ongoing communication and shared decision making. This philosophy ensures the needs of a diverse and evolving population is continually met. Santa Rosa Technology Magnet has been recognized as a California Distinguished School in 2006, 2010 and 2014 based upon the Academic Performance Index and school's Signature Practices. During the 2013-14 school year, 592 kindergarten through eighth grade students were enrolled at the school, with classes arranged on a traditional schedule calendar. Student body demographics are provided in the chart. 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Santa Rosa Technology Magnet Page 1 of 8

About the SARC Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. View this SARC online at the school and/or LEA Web sites. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school at (805) 491-3822. 2013-14 Student Enrollment by Grade Level Grade Level Number of Students Kinder. 65 Gr. 1-- 63 Gr. 2-- 68 Gr. 3-- 72 Gr. 4-- 66 Gr. 5-- 66 Gr. 6-- 67 Gr. 7-- 63 Gr. 8-- 62 Total-- 592 2013-14 Student Enrollment by Group Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American------- 1.0 American Indian or Alaska Native--- 0.7 ---- Asian------- 10.3 Filipino------- 3.0 Hispanic or Latino------- 15.9 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0 White 65.9 Two or More Races 3.2 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 6.8 English Learners 2.5 Students with Disabilities 7.8 A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair. Teacher Credentials Santa Rosa Technology Magnet 12-13 13-14 14-15 Fully Credentialed 26 25 Without Full Credential 0 0 Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 0 0 Pleasant Valley Elementary School District 12-13 13-14 14-15 Fully Credentialed Without Full Credential Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions at this School Santa Rosa Technology Magnet 12-13 13-14 14-15 Teachers of English Learners 0 0 Total Teacher Misassignments 0 0 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 * Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers 2013-14 Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Location of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 100.00 0.00 Districtwide All Schools 98.85 1.15 High-Poverty Schools 94.62 5.38 Low-Poverty Schools 100.00 0.00 * High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Santa Rosa Technology Magnet Page 2 of 8

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2014-15) The school district held a public hearing on October 17, 2013, and determined that each school within the district had sufficient and good quality textbooks, instructional materials, or science lab equipment pursuant to the settlement of Williams vs. the State of California. All students, including English learners, are given their own individual standards-aligned textbooks or instructional materials, or both, in core subjects for use in the classroom and to take home. Textbooks and supplementary materials are adopted according to a cycle developed by the California Department of Education, making the textbooks used in the school the most current available. Materials approved for use by the State are reviewed by all teachers and a recommendation is made to the School Board by a selection committee composed of teachers and administrators. All recommended materials are available for parent examination at the district office prior to adoption. Core Curriculum Area Reading/Language Arts The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Percent of students lacking their own assigned textbook: 0 Mathematics The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Percent of students lacking their own assigned textbook: 0 Textbooks and Instructional Materials Year and month in which data were collected: October 17, 2013 Yes Yes Textbooks and Instructional Materials/Year of Adoption K-5 Houghton Mifflin Adopted in 2003 6th-8th Prentice Hall Adopted in 2002 K-5 Houghton Mifflin/Harcourt Adopted in 2009 6th-7th Glencoe Adopted in 2008 7th-8th Prentice Hall Adopted in 2009 Science The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Percent of students lacking their own assigned textbook: 0 History-Social Science The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Percent of students lacking their own assigned textbook: 0 Yes Yes 8th Mind Institute Adopted in 2007 K-5 MacMillan Adopted in 2008 6th-7th McDougal Littell Adopted 2008 K-5 Scott Foresman Adopted in 2006 6th-8th McDougal Littell Adopted in 2006 School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year) Santa Rosa Technology Magnet was originally constructed in 1911 and is comprised of 16 permanent classrooms, eight portable classrooms, one multipurpose room, a library, a staff lounge, a computer lab, a science lab and a playground. Cleaning Process Two part-time custodians ensure that the cleaning of the school is maintained to provide for a clean and safe school. The district governing board has adopted cleaning standards for all schools in the district. A summary of these standards are available at the district office for review. Maintenance and Repair District maintenance staff ensures that the repairs necessary to keep the school in good repair and work orders are completed in a timely manner. A work order process is used to ensure efficient service and highest priority are given to emergency repairs. Deferred Maintenance Budget The district participates in the State School Deferred Maintenance Program, which provides matching funds on a dollar for dollar basis, to assist school districts with expenditures for major repair or replacement of existing school building components. Typically this includes roofing, plumbing, heating, electrical systems, interior or exterior painting, and floor systems. For the 2013-14 school year, the district allocated $249,269 for the deferred maintenance program. This represents 0.50% of the district s general fund budget. A list of deferred maintenance projects may be obtained from the district office. 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Santa Rosa Technology Magnet Page 3 of 8

System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: 07/25/2013 Repair Status Good Fair Poor Overall Rating Exemplary Good Fair Poor ---------- [ ] Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned MPR PTA Room- Wood door is deteriorating, needs to be replaced. 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Santa Rosa Technology Magnet Page 4 of 8

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress and its successor the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program); The Academic Performance Index; and The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. Subject CAASPP Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State 11-12 12-13 13-14 11-12 12-13 13-14 11-12 12-13 13-14 Science 93 89 93 77 75 74 60 59 60 * Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) assessments include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA). Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Subject STAR Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State 10-11 11-12 12-13 10-11 11-12 12-13 10-11 11-12 12-13 ELA 87 90 91 70 71 69 54 56 55 Math 84 85 86 65 65 63 49 50 50 HSS 76 76 88 66 67 68 48 49 49 * STAR Program was last administered in 2012-13. Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Academic Performance Index Ranks - Three-Year Comparison API Rank 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Statewide------- 10 10 10 Similar Schools------- 8 8 9 * For 2014 and subsequent years, the statewide and similar schools ranks will no longer be produced. Grade Level 2013-14 Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards 4 of 6 5 of 6 6 of 6 ---5--- 24.2 25.8 31.8 ---7--- 8.1 9.7 79.0 * Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. 2013-14 CAASPP Results by Student Group Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) All Students in the LEA 74 All Student at the School 93 Male------- 93 Female------- 93 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian------- 85 Filipino------- Hispanic or Latino 83 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander White------- 96 Two or More Races------- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners------- Students with Disabilities 82 Students Receiving Migrant Education Services * CAASPP includes science assessments (CSTs, CMA, and CAPA) in grades 5, 8, and 10. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. API Growth by Student Group Three-Year Comparison Group Actual API Change 10-11 11-12 12-13 All Students at the School 19 6 5 Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Asian------- Filipino------- Hispanic or Latino 32 29 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander White------- 20 4-6 Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities * "N/D means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. B means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or target information. C means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Santa Rosa Technology Magnet Page 5 of 8

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement The school provides numerous opportunities for parents to participate within the school community. The PTA raises funds to support our technology, physical education, and art programs, and provides a K-8 counselor and school site computer technician. Parents volunteer in the classrooms, provide clerical assistance in the office, supervise field trips, support extracurricular programs, coach athletics teams, and organize fundraising opportunities. Parents are encouraged to attend parent education nights, performances, award assemblies, athletic events, and other school functions. State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety. School Safety Plan The Safety of students and staff is a primary concern of Santa Rosa Technology Magnet School. The school is always in compliance with all laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to hazardous materials and state earthquake standards. The School Site Safety plan is reviewed and updated in the fall of each year by the School Safety Committee. All revisions are communicated to both the classified and certificated staff. The school s disaster preparedness plan includes steps for ensuring student and staff safety during a disaster. Fire, disaster, lock-down and evacuation drills are conducted on a regular basis (monthly) throughout the school year. Students are supervised before and after school, as well as during recess, lunch and passing periods by campus supervisors, teachers, custodians and administration. There is a designated area for student drop off and pick up. Visitors must sign in and out in the office and receive a visitor's badge. Unauthorized visitors are not permitted on campus. Suspensions and Expulsions School 11-12 12-13 13-14 Suspensions Rate 1.3 0.0 2.3 Expulsions Rate 0.0 0.0 0.0 District 11-12 12-13 13-14 Suspensions Rate 3.2 2.0 2.0 Expulsions Rate 0.0 0.0 0.0 State 11-12 12-13 13-14 Suspensions Rate 5.7 5.1 4.4 Expulsions Rate 0.1 0.1 0.1 * The rate of suspensions and expulsions is calculated by dividing the total number of incidents by the total enrollment x 100. 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Santa Rosa Technology Magnet Page 6 of 8

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. 2013-14 Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria Made AYP Overall AYP Criteria School District Met Participation Rate: English-Language Arts Met Participation Rate: Mathematics Met Percent Proficient: English-Language Arts Met Percent Proficient: Mathematics Met API Criteria Program Improvement Status 2014-15 Federal Intervention Program Indicator School District In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2011-2012 Year in Program Improvement Year 3 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 5 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 100.0 * DW (determination waiver) indicates that the PI status of the school was carried over from the prior year in accordance with the flexibility granted through the federal waiver process. Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution Average Class Size Number of Classrooms* 1-20 21-32 33+ Grade 12 13 14 12 13 14 12 13 14 12 13 14 Kinder. 23.7 20 22 0 3 3 3 0 Gr. 1-- 21 23 21 3 0 3 6 0 Gr. 2-- 24 24 23 0 2 3 6 0 Gr. 3-- 23 22 24 0 2 3 6 0 Gr. 4-- 33 33 33 0 0 1 2 1 4 Gr. 5-- 33.5 34 33 0 0 2 2 4 Gr. 6-- 21 23 9 7 6 3 4 7 English 30.5 29 28 0 1 1 2 2 3 2 2 1 Math--- 30.3 25 30 0 1 2 2 3 2 2 1 Science 30.5 33 31 0 3 2 2 1 2 2 SS----- 30.5 33 31 0 3 2 2 1 2 2 * Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level. Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff at this School Number of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Academic Counselor-------.5 Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) 0 Library Media Teacher (Librarian) 0 Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) 0 Psychologist-------.5 Social Worker------- 0 Nurse------- 1 Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist.5 Resource Specialist------- 1 Other-------.6 Average Number of Students per Staff Member Academic Counselor------- * One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. FY 2012-13 Teacher and Administrative Salaries Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $41,027 $41,507 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $64,911 $67,890 Highest Teacher Salary $81,259 $86,174 Average Principal Salary (ES) $95,815 $109,131 Average Principal Salary (MS) $101,385 $111,937 Average Principal Salary (HS) $0 $109,837 Superintendent Salary $154,197 $185,462 Percent of District Budget Teacher Salaries 44 42 Administrative Salaries 5 6 * For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Santa Rosa Technology Magnet Page 7 of 8

FY 2012-13 Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries Level Expenditures Per Pupil Total Restricted Unrestricted Average Teacher Salary School Site------- $3,890 $2 $3,888 $61,963 District------- $4,173 $61,721 State------- $4,690 $70,788 Percent Difference: School Site/District -6.8% -3.2% Percent Difference: School Site/ State -29.8% -11.7% Types of Services Funded at Santa Rosa Technology Magnet Professional Development provided for Teachers at Santa Rosa Technology Magnet Educators are always life-long learners. Opportunities for training and staff development are provided at both the district and individual school sites to administrators, teachers, and classified staff. The district offers professional growth opportunities in curriculum, teaching strategies, and methodologies. Teachers are also given time to assess student achievement and work collaboratively to design instruction that is aligned to Common Core State Standards. Grade level teams participate in self guided professional development. The district offered one or more staff development days a year for the past three years. 2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Santa Rosa Technology Magnet Page 8 of 8