Roosevelt Elementary School California Department of Education School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2016-17 School Year By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners). Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents.
About This School Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) District Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) School Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) District Name Santa Barbara Unified School Name Roosevelt Elementary School Phone Number (805) 963-4338 Street 1990 Laguna St. Superintendent Cary Matsuoka City, State, Zip Santa Barbara, Ca, 93101-1098 E-mail Address cmatsuoka@sbunified.org Phone Number 805-563-2062 Web Site http://www.sbunified.org Principal Christy Bazemore, Principal E-mail Address cbazemore@sbunified.org Web Site http://www.sbunified.org County-District-School (CDS) Code 42767866045926 Last updated: 1/29/2018 School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2017-18) School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2017-18) Roosevelt Elementary School is named after President Theodore Roosevelt and is the proud home of the Rough Riders. It is a diverse and integrated school community of approximately six hundred students. Seventy-eight percent of the students have a primary language of English; 22 percent are identified as English Language Learners. Located in the upper east side of Santa Barbara, the school site is slightly under four acres and is the smallest campus in the Santa Barbara Unified School District. The classrooms are housed in a two-story building, which was completed in the 1999-2000 school year. We promote and support academic excellence, together with the social, emotional, and physical well being of each child. Last updated: 1/16/2018 Page 2 of 17
Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2016-17) Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2016-17) Grade Level Number of Students Kindergarten 90 100 Grade 1 80 Grade 2 75 80 Grade 3 74 Grade 4 93 Grade 5 82 Grade 6 83 Total Enrollment 577 60 40 20 0 Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Last updated: 12/4/2017 Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2016-17) Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American 0.7 % American Indian or Alaska Native 0.9 % Asian 2.4 % Filipino 0.3 % Hispanic or Latino 47.3 % Last updated: 12/4/2017 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.2 % White 47.3 % Two or More Races 0.7 % Other 0.2 % Student Group (Other) Percent of Total Enrollment Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 37.1 % English Learners 23.1 % Students with Disabilities 9.0 % Foster Youth 0.7 % Page 3 of 17
A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair Teacher Credentials Teacher Credentials Teachers School District 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2017-18 With Full Credential 28 27 28 667 Without Full Credential 1 0 1 14 Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0 0 0 36 30 25 20 15 Teachers with Full Credential Teachers without Full Credential Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 10 5 0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Last updated: 1/3/2018 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Indicator Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 0 0 0 1.0 Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments Vacant Teacher Positions Total Teacher Misassignments* 0 0 0 0.5 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 0 0.0-0.5-1.0 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Last updated: 1/3/2018 Page 4 of 17
Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2017-18) Year and month in which the data were collected: November 2017 Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/year of Adoption From Most Recent Adoption? Percent Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy Reading/Language Arts SRA/McGraw-Hill, SRA Open Court, 2002 Yes 0.0 % Mathematics Pearson Scott Foresman, Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley envision Math California, 2009 Yes 0.0 % Science Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, California Science, 2007 Yes 0.0 % History-Social Science Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Reflections: California Series, 2007 Yes 0.0 % Foreign Language 0.0 % Health 0.0 % Visual and Performing Arts Science Lab Eqpmt (Grades 9-12) Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. 0.0 % N/A N/A 0.0 % Last updated: 12/6/2017 Page 5 of 17
School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements Roosevelt School is a closed campus. During school hours, any visitors must enter and check in at the office before being on campus. Before school, supervision begins at 8:00 a.m. and after school students go home by bus and family. Roosevelt School is a newer school; the building was completed in April 2000, and is in excellent condition. The school is located in the upper east side of Santa Barbara, close to the famous Santa Barbara Mission. The school site is slightly under four acres in size. The classrooms are housed in a two-story building and are well maintained by two custodial staff members. School Facility Good Repair Status Year and month of the most recent FIT report: December 2017 Last updated: 1/16/2018 System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Rating Good Good Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned Multipurpose room blinds need replacing, scheduled for upcoming renovation. Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/Doors/Gates/Fences Good Good Good Good Good Good Library window has termite damage. A leaderhead by Laguna Street is missing. Some stucco cracking at rooms 1,2, 16 and 17. Fall surface under the play equipment needs to be replaced. Overall Facility Rate Year and month of the most recent FIT report: December 2017 Overall Rating Exemplary Last updated: 1/24/2018 Page 6 of 17
B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for students in the general education population and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] and mathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. Only eligible students may participate in the administration of the CAAs. CAAs items are aligned with alternate achievement standards, which are linked with the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities); and The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. CAASPP Test Results in ELA and Mathematics for All Students CAASPP Test Results in ELA and Mathematics for All Students Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards School District State Subject 2015-16 2016-17 2015-16 2016-17 2015-16 2016-17 English Language Arts / Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) 54% 51% 51% 52% 48% 48% Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11) 44% 41% 41% 43% 36% 37% Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Last updated: 12/4/2017 Page 7 of 17
CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 341 334 97.95% 51.20% Male 176 172 97.73% 40.70% Female 165 162 98.18% 62.35% Black or African American -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 169 165 97.63% 27.88% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- White 155 153 98.71% 74.51% Two or More Races -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 144 141 97.92% 26.24% English Learners 106 104 98.11% 21.15% Students with Disabilities 31 31 100.00% -- Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Last updated: 12/4/2017 Page 8 of 17
CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 341 335 98.24% 41.19% Male 176 172 97.73% 40.12% Female 165 163 98.79% 42.33% Black or African American -- -- -- American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- Asian -- -- -- Filipino -- -- -- Hispanic or Latino 169 165 97.63% 17.58% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- White 155 153 98.71% 64.71% Two or More Races -- -- -- Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 144 142 98.61% 16.90% English Learners 106 105 99.06% 16.19% Students with Disabilities 31 30 96.77% 16.67% Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Foster Youth Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. Last updated: 12/4/2017 Page 9 of 17
CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students Grades Five, Eight and Ten Grades Five, Eight and Ten Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced School District State Subject 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 68.0% 57.0% 58.0% 55.0% 56% 54% Note: Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) in grades five, eight, and ten. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note:The 2016-17 data are not available. The California Department of Education is developing a new science assessment based on the Next Generation Science Standards for California Public Schools (CA NGSS). The new California Science Test (CAST) was piloted in spring 2017. The CST and CMA for Science will no longer be administered. Last updated: 12/4/2017 Page 10 of 17
State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8): Pupil outcomes in the subject area of physical education California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2016-17) California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2016-17) Percentage of Students Meeting Fitness Standards Grade Level Four of Six Fitness Standards Five of Six Fitness Standards Six of Six Fitness Standards 5 11.1% 29.6% 40.7% Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Last updated: 1/3/2018 Page 11 of 17
C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2017-18) Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2017-18) Contact Person Name: Ms. Christy Bazemore, principal Contact Person Phone Number: (805) 563-2062 Roosevelt parents volunteer hundreds of hours in classrooms which helps to enable teachers to carry out enrichment projects and provide small group instruction. Parents can either volunteer in their child s classroom, or in a variety of Roosevelt Elementary Education Foundation/PTO events/projects. Through the generous support of our REEF/PTO, students have the opportunity to participate in a number of enrichment programs, including after school enrichment classes, cultural assemblies, art education program, theatrical performances and educational field trips. REEF also sponsors activities to promote a strong school community, including the annual Fall Ball, Family Nights, Spring Carnival, and Rose Run. State Priority: Pupil Engagement Last updated: 1/16/2018 The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Engagement (Priority 5): High school dropout rates; and High school graduation rates Page 12 of 17
State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety Suspensions and Expulsions Suspensions and Expulsions School District State Rate 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Suspensions -- 0.3% 0.7% 2.4% 2.8% 3.4% 3.8% 3.7% 3.7% Expulsions -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% Suspensions Expulsions 4.0 3.5 School Suspensions District Suspensions State Suspensions 0.25 School Expulsions District Expulsions State Expulsions 0.20 3.0 2.5 0.15 2.0 1.5 0.10 1.0 0.05 0.5 0.0 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 0.00 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 School Safety Plan (School Year 2017-18) Last updated: 1/23/2018 Date of Last Review/Update: March 2017 Date Last Discussed with Staff: September 2017 The Comprehensive School Site Safety Plan was developed in collaboration with local agencies and the district office to fulfill Senate Bill 187 requirements. Components of this plan include child abuse reporting procedures, teacher notification of dangerous pupil procedures, disaster response procedures, procedures for safe arrival and departure from school, sexual harassment policy, and dress code policy. Safety plans are available at www.sbunified.org/safety Last updated: 1/16/2018 Page 13 of 17
D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2017-18) Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2017-18) Indicator School District Program Improvement Status Not in PI In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2013-2014 Year in Program Improvement Year 1 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 15 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement N/A 93.8% Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Last updated: 12/5/2017 Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Number of Classes * Grade Level Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ Average Class Size 1-20 21-32 33+ K 25.0 1 3 0 24.0 1 3 0 23.0 1 3 0 1 24.0 0 3 0 26.0 0 3 0 27.0 0 3 0 2 23.0 0 4 0 25.0 0 3 0 25.0 0 3 0 3 28.0 0 3 0 24.0 0 4 0 25.0 0 3 0 4 28.0 0 3 0 30.0 0 3 0 31.0 0 3 0 5 30.0 0 3 0 29.0 0 3 0 27.0 0 3 0 6 31.0 0 3 0 27.0 0 3 0 28.0 0 3 0 Other 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 * Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class). Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2016-17) Last updated: 12/5/2017 Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor Academic Counselor Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) 1.0 N/A Library Media Teacher (Librarian) 0.0 N/A Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) 1.0 N/A Psychologist 0.5 N/A Social Worker 0.0 N/A Nurse 1.0 N/A Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 1.0 N/A Resource Specialist (non-teaching) 0.0 N/A Other 2.0 N/A Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Page 14 of 17
*One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Last updated: 1/16/2018 Level Total Expenditures Per Pupil Expenditures Per Pupil (Restricted) Expenditures Per Pupil (Unrestricted) Average Teacher Salary School Site $8897.0 $1844.0 $7054.0 $78235.0 District N/A N/A $7979.0 $72860.0 Percent Difference School Site and District N/A N/A -12.3% 7.1% State N/A N/A $6574.0 $77824.0 Percent Difference School Site and State N/A N/A 7.0% 0.5% Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. Last updated: 1/3/2018 Page 15 of 17
Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2016-17) Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2016-17) Roosevelt School receives federal Title I, targeted monies along with funds allocated through LCAP (the Local Control Funding Formula) as well as generous donations and fundraising through the Roosevelt Elementary Education Foundation (REEF). Services provided by LCAP to enable underperforming students to meet standards include as well as funds provided by REEF to support all students include: Extended day targeted instruction for English Language Learners Newcomer instructional support provides additional language intervention for identified students who are learning English Family Service Agency counselor provides direct service to students and families and/or secure community resources when appropriate; Art, Music and PE teachers who works with classroom teachers to integrate the instruction into the curriculum and provide time for PLCs Curriculum specialists at each grade level who support the instructional work of classroom teachers by providing individual and small group instructional support Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Last updated: 1/18/2018 Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $48,532 $48,522 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $76,779 $75,065 Highest Teacher Salary $88,105 $94,688 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $114,332 $119,876 Average Principal Salary (Middle) $132,291 $126,749 Average Principal Salary (High) $133,436 $135,830 Superintendent Salary $260,164 $232,390 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 37.0% 37.0% Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 6.0% 5.0% For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Teacher Salary Chart Principal Salary Chart 100000 150000 80000 125000 100000 60000 75000 40000 50000 20000 25000 0 Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary 0 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) Average Principal Salary (Middle) Average Principal Salary (High) Last updated: 1/3/2018 Professional Development The primary areas of professional development include developing literacy across the curriculum, using technology in the classroom, and continuing to support the Page 16 of 17
implementation of the Common Core State Standards. Professional development is selected using student achievement data and input from teachers. Professional development is offered as an integral part of site based Professional Learning Communities (PLC), in workshops with leading experts in the area of literacy across the curriculum, conferences, as well as through individual mentoring. Last updated: 1/16/2018 Page 17 of 17